Main Contents

Netanyahu Warns Biden With ‘Broken Glass’

America In Decline Articles


By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

For The Best Alternative News CLICK: Here

“I HAVE NOTHING TO OFFER YOU BUT BROKEN GLASS,” Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed US Vice President Biden during an after-dinner ceremony in Jerusalem on March 9, 2010.

Netanyahu had prepared a symbolic gift for visiting Vice President Joe Biden: a framed document announcing that several trees were planted in Jerusalem in memory of Biden’s mother, a loyal supporter of Israel.

But with Biden’s mission to persuade the Israeli government to begin shrinking Greater Israel back to its pre-1967 borders, Netanyahu leaned on the present (NOT “accidentally” as reported by the Jew-owned press) and shattered the glass frame.

Then came Netanyahu’s cyptic warning and by way of indirection, a threat to Obama: “I have one thing to offer you right now, and it’s broken glass.” View Full Photo Here.

It got worse. At a later tour of Israel’s Holocaust memorial museum, Yad Vashem, the lights in the Hall of Remembrance “unexpectedly” went out as a prayer for the dead was chanted.

Catching Biden’s security detail by surprise as they anxiously stood for over 60 seconds in utter darkness, only the “eternal fire” that honored the Jewish dead spread its ominous light upon the Biden contingent.

By the time the lights flickered back on, Biden’s Middle East fortunes were sealed with an Israeli announcement that it would build 1,600 new homes for Jewish settlers, ignoring US and Palestinian objections. On Biden’s departure for Jordan, Ha’aretz reported that Israel plans to build 50,000 new homes in East Jerusalem over the next three years.

The “broken glass” and the “moments of darkness” that Biden experienced were not chance events. Nothing happens at official Israeli gatherings that is not carefully planned and orchestrated in advance. And in spite of Biden’s groveling before Netanyahu and Peres, with vows of Israel being the “centerpiece of US policy,” the Vice President’s cowering was met with glassy eyes by the leaders of the “master race.”

Symbolic acts, such as the breaking of a glass by a Jewish groom before making vows of faithfulness to his bride at every Jewish wedding, are part of Jewish tradition. When the Jewish groom crushes the glass beneath his right foot, he silently pledges to avenge the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem and wage war on all those who would perpetuate that destruction.

David Wilder, spokesman for Jewish settlers in the West Bank city of Hebron, said he did not necessarily believe “all of this happened during Biden’s visit to Israel because of divine intervention” but he saw the mishaps as “very symbolic.”

“When the United States doesn’t play its cards right, Wilder said, “it gets a gift of broken glass,” noting also that “one of the plagues in Egypt was darkness.”

Surely none of this was lost on Biden who is well aware of the Mossad’s assassination teams who rove throughout the world targeting for the dung heap those it deems to be Israel’s enemies. Netanyahu has made it known through Jewish-styled symbolism that both Biden and Obama could be next on the Mossad’s hit list.

Shards of glass that cut and bleed, and a darkness shrouding the memory of the dead are ominous signs of what awaits those who oppose the masters of the goyim. Surely, the look of the “master race” was written all over Netanyahu’s face as he handed Biden the document with sharp pieces of the glass frame scattered upon it.

Netanyahu and his Jewish agents in America were deeply aggrieved when Obama went to Cairo on June 4, 2009, for an address to the Muslim world without stopping in Israel.

That such a visit would sabotage Netanyahu’s quest for a Greater Israel through continual expansion and elimination of competitive states in the region was carefully filed in the annals of Israel’s foreign policy posture towards America. Symbolic messages portending revenge were not long in coming…


For More See: The Mossad’s Infiltration Of America Click Here

And: Mossad Spy To Run The White House Click Here

And: ‘Religious’ Zionism As A New Political Force Click Here

And: The Israeli Global Military Beast Click Here

CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

Brother Nathanael @ March 16, 2010


  1. Brother Nathanael March 16, 2010 @ 12:49 am

    Hi Everybody –

    The SCOOP starts here on Real Zionist News.

    It is now 2AM and THIS is my service to all of you.

    Please consider donating to keep this site online and multiple expenses for the ministry I wish to sustain.

    A DONATION FEATURE BUTTON is at the Top & Bottom of this article. Or simply Click:

    Donations May Also Be Safely Sent To:

    Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    Much Love In Christ To You All!

    +Brother Nathanael

  2. CFR PUPPETS RUN OBAMAGRAD March 16, 2010 @ 1:05 am

    Wow, I thought Barky and Bilderberg Joe were on the same team with the Globalist elites.

    It could all be theatrics for some public opinion shaping agenda, but when we look at historical figures who went against the Globalists like JFK – who knows?…

    The World is getting more evil all the time. I hope we all make it out of this mess to a better place.

    Man is always missing the big picture. I can’t judge anyone as i’m a sinner deserving of hell.

    We humans have a tendency to focus on the irrelevant during the storms of life and be blinded to the bigger, greater, and more important things in life (i.e., the big picture). We need Christ more than ever.

    I hope many will be saved. Pray that they will. As many as God wills.

  3. miranda March 16, 2010 @ 2:56 am

    And every time you go to a Catholic service, you are subjected to a reading of some passage in the Old Testament praising Israel’s story.

    What institutions in the USA are left, that will stand up to our Jewish oppressors. Dang!

    Thanks for this report, dear Brother.

  4. Brother Nathanael March 16, 2010 @ 3:22 am

    @ miranda –

    Please understand that “Israel” in the Old AND New Testament refers to the “Israel of God,” that is the “Church.”

    The majority of Jews both in the Old Testament and the New Testament DESPISED God’s promise of forgiveness and salvation.

    Only the “remnant” of Jews, the CHURCH, the “Israel of God,” both in the Old and New Testaments (here made up of Jews and Gentiles who became one new man in Christ, “Christians,” were devoted to their Creator and Redeemer.

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Russian Orthodox Church

  5. Jimmy "T" March 16, 2010 @ 5:08 am

    WOW! Very interesting article, Brother Nathanael.

    Keep them coming!

    My donation is on it’s way!

  6. Karen March 16, 2010 @ 7:31 am

    What a bully.

    All they do is offer up death and destruction.

    That’s what they have to offer the world. What a bunch of self-involved maniacal losers.

    Biden and Obama need to grow a spine and stand up to big, bad Israel.

  7. N6J March 16, 2010 @ 7:56 am

    By diplomatic standards, “Binny” Netanyahu has done something quite disturbing by handing over that frame with its broken glass.

    No clear-thinking diplomat or head of state would ever give something damaged let alone dangerous to another diplomat or representative of any government.

    This action violates protocol standards immensely. VP Biden should not have taken hold of the damaged “gift.” Instead, a Secret Service agent should have received it and placed it out of reach into some container.

    Had breaking the glass been an accident, Binny would have sent it away promising to replace it as soon as possible. Owing to the likelihood that this is no accident does not bode well for US diplomatic efforts.

    Israel reminds me of an infected, ingrown tonail on a big toe. It may be small, but it can cause bigger problems if not treated effectively.

    Obviously, our President does not “get it” as far as Jewish hegemony is concerned. We can expect further “hints” in the near future much like this event but happening closer to home.

  8. Fr. Joseph March 16, 2010 @ 8:36 am


    Your vehement anti-Catholicism has been publicly noted by people the World over.

    Without a doubt, you have NOT been given PROPER Christian catechesis – and much of the rest of the peoples of the World nowadays.

    The READINGS from the Canon of the Church’s Sacred Scriptures at ALL of the Catholic Church’s Masses in that part of the Eucharistic Liturgy known as ‘The Liturgy of the Word’.

    This PRECEDES ‘The Liturgy of the Eucharist’, and EXPLAINS and TIES-TOGETHER the prefigurements as well as prophecies found in the Old Testament-Old Covenant formed between GOD and His then ‘Chosen People’ with the New Testament-New Covenant formed between GOD INCARNATE and His NEW ‘Chosen People’ who are the members of HIS CHURCH, HIS ‘Ecclesia’, His ‘Duly Assembled’.

    Now lookie here, anti-Catholicism is the global, world-wide ‘SAFE FORM’ of venting out own’s own personal hatreds, prejudices and judgements against a ‘Something’ or ‘Someone’.

    When was the last time the Catholic Church sent out her ‘Assasination Squads’ to put down and SHUT UP her worldly critics?

    When was the last time the Catholic Church THREATENED the capitols of Europe with thermonuclear weapons?

    When was the last time the Catholic Church’s Bishops, Priests or Religious bless, authorized, commanded or ordered SOLDIERS to put bullets into the skulls of mere children, calling them mere ‘animals’?

    If you really and truly DO ‘Want To Vent Your Spleen’ vs. ‘Organized Religion’, then here is my ‘dare’ to you and everyone else.

    GO DO THAT IN FRONT OF EVERY LAST ISRAELI EMBASSY in the capitols of the Nations of our contemporary World.

    Go to ISRAEL, drag Pat Robertson, John Hagee and Jimmy Swaggart all ALL of their followers-tithe givers along with you, go to TEL AVIV as well as to JERUSALEM – and all of you can then VENT ‘properly’.

    Thank you.

    – Fr. Joseph

    “The World Struggle is NOT political or economic. Rather, it is religious and theological. It is either GOD or atheism.”
    – U.S. 5 Star General Douglas MacArthur to visiting Catholic Bishop Fulton Sheen in Allied Occupied Japan.

    Those who call themselves contemporary ‘Jews’ outright REJECT God Incarnate.

    Without His Divine Spiritual Graces working in their individual and collective minds, hearts, souls and spirits – you might start begin understanding HOW and WHY ‘they’ act and plot and plan and behave and conduct themselves amongst us all in this contemporary ‘World’ of ours, the year now being 2010 Anno Domini.

  9. Joe Cortina March 16, 2010 @ 10:07 am

    The insult and not-so veiled threat was not aimed at the beady eyes reptilian Biden. That was a DIRECT threat to every man woman and child in America.

    The message was loud and clear even to the ‘dimmest of bulbs’ = “WE are the master race and if you stupid cattle get out of line – we will make your pathetic servile cowardly lives even more miserable.”

    Its a Jew thing – and if you have ever had the disgusting gut-wrenching experience to be among their inner circle of depraved filth in IsraHELL – as I did – you will understand EXACTLY what I mean.

    I dealt with Jews for years in the ‘needle trades’ business and was insulted in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. I finally got tired of it and one day at a Chicago business meeting with several of the ‘tribe’, as they bullied and intimidated me, even though I was the President of my small manufacturing business.

    Bad idea heebs! I had enough and let them know WHO was the ‘alpha male’ of that board room meeting. I called for a cab to the airport and informed them that they would no longer be representing (read: PROFITING from) my companies product.

    INSTANTLY-their entire attitude changed. When they realized that their rancid insulting bully mentality would NOT be tolerated – they became very accomodating and even appolgetic. Again – its a Jew thing – and ONLY the Jew conducts himself in that disgusting way.

    IF we EVER have the will to be a FREE people again this is EXACTLY what we – collectively as a nation of once proud brave people – need to do at the EARLIEST opportunity as an answer that that putrid threat and insult from the “SONS OF THE DEVIL” as Christ so ACCURATELY exposed them.

    WE need to simply do this: TELL that greasy Jew Yahoo that if he ever threatens the American people again – we WILL turn his sorry -ass demonic stolen little sh*t-hole ‘country’ of spineless baby killing Godless Christian hating theives liars and perverts – into a radioactive glob of green molten glass visable from the moon!

    When are you people going to get tired of having your collective noses rubbed in filthy Jew sh*t for the amusement of the ‘master race’?

    Are you REAL MEN – REAL AMERICANS – or simply cattle like the Jews mockingly call us? The time for ‘cutting bait’ is long past, people. You can – for a START – begin to act like men and patriots and support this site.

    Nathanael gets HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of hits but hardly and of you cheap bastards will so much as sacrafice the price of a lousy sixpak or box of cigarettes to sustain his unwavering devotion and courage to this nation.

    ANYBODY can afford a few dollars to secure the future of our freedoms = ANYBODY! Stop being such shallow cheap selfish hypoocrites! DISGUSTING!

    JUST DO IT – NOW – TODAY – THIS MINUTE – for your family – for your country – please!

    Joe Cortina

  10. Enya March 16, 2010 @ 11:22 am

    The King James Bible does not say anything about Masses, or Popes or Cardinals, or Nuns!!!

    The R.C. church is NOT Christian, period.

  11. Eamon March 16, 2010 @ 11:53 am

    @Fr Joseph,

    Miranda’s comment, which was hardly “vehement anti-Catholicism”, is all-too-accurate in this post-V2 world.

    Your comments about the ‘liturgy of the word’ and the ‘liturgy of the eucharist’ make it clear you ‘preside’ at the Novus Ordo Missae, the worship of the Judaized Vatican.

    Now lookie here, you go ‘preside’ of the ‘assembly’, handing out cookies (BTW, the NOM is invalid) telling them about Benedict’s non-existent virtue and conservatism, etc.


  12. Voice in the Wilderness March 16, 2010 @ 12:43 pm

    Examine the following, and witness the fulfillment of the scripture at the bottom.

    You TRULY have reason to stand up and lift up your heads, if you be of Christ Yeshua! It’s is HIS battle and He will fight it in a way that you cannot fathom!

    If one has read the above links, then the following Promises may hold more important meaning now:

    25) There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea.

    26) Men will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly
    bodies will be shaken.

    27) At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

    28) When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.” Luke 21:25-28

    Lift up your heads, and be of Good Cheer, the Cavalry’s a Comin!

    Concentrate your witness FOR Christ, the hour is late indeed and there is yet time for a precious few to have the blinders removed from their eyes.

    Blessings in Christ Yeshua

  13. Robert Bozeman March 16, 2010 @ 1:59 pm

    The big problem is the ignorance of ministers of the Gospel in the USA.

    Many of them preach the significance of National Israel which was formed in the 1940 era by an act of well meaning men (governments).

    Gal 3:29 along with all of Romans and other Scriptures make it clear that Jesus was talking to this Planet, not the Middle East, when he referred to Israel or His second coming.

  14. The Prodigal Son March 16, 2010 @ 2:05 pm

    Excellent podcast from Mark Glenn & Phil Tourney of The Ugly Truth/The Liberty Hour:

    Their guest is Dr. Alan Sabrosky… An Ex Marine who says that Israel did 9/11 and that top military men are finally figuring it out.

    When asked about the reactions of the military men he spoke to – his answer was, “First disbelief… then RAGE.”

  15. jonah March 16, 2010 @ 2:08 pm

    Yeah, some Master Race…. Ha!

    These Jewish SCUM have made so many mistakes in trying to set up their Jew World Order, that’s its only a matter of time before their whole house of cards comes crashing to the ground!

    They might as well just slit their own throats! Because in Hell-Fire they will curse the God of Heaven for the TORMENT that they will have to endure for the rest of eternity for their CRIMES.

    A Fate WORSE THAN DEATH awaits them all. Its Judgment time from an angry and righteous God, folks. Look up, your redemption draweth nigh….


    Jonah the Prophet
    California USA

  16. Al March 16, 2010 @ 2:10 pm

    Surely you can all see it’s blackmail.

    It’s the way they work. Israel spies in the U.S. = everywhere. They have the goods on America’s evil doings, past and present. Enough to bring down the country.

    So be it! The truth will set you free, as will using those weapons stockpiled for Iran on the real problem, Israhell!

  17. William March 16, 2010 @ 2:23 pm

    It’s all an act.

    Israel controls the media / judicial / political (art of blackmail)/ you name it, in the U.S. of A’s.

    Biden made public his Zionist beliefs when he went into the White House. And like any mafia blood oath, you know the consequences if you stab the brothers in the back.

    Problem for the Zionists is the elite in Washington have alot on Israeli people who played a major role in September 11, 2001, and won’t roll over as quickly as before.

    My guess is the US government and Israel’s government will cancel each other out. The majority of the public is sick of the arrogant elite and the media babbling Babylonian’s endless lies.

  18. Lynda March 16, 2010 @ 2:49 pm

    Eamon, the flock is scattered.

    As Pope St Pius X stated: Our enemies have from the beginning had the clear purpose of first dividing you (the flock) from us (the Holy Father and the bishops) and then to sow discord.

    This is accomplished. However, we should not accept the discord. We should be reaching out to those who profess the Catholic faith and those who would be Catholic in the novus ordo and who are attempting to persevere in the faith by resorting to sede vacantes chapels which adhere to traditional rites.

    The latter, however, could not care less about the restoration of the papacy. And we know that Peter will always have successors. We know that even though the Chair in Rome is usurped – the Rock endures.

    There is nothing sede vacantism is less interested in than this Catholic truth.

    Fr Joseph is in orders. You do not know what rite his bishop instructs him to use or if it contains the rubric that comes under the anathema of Trent – as does the English canon for the consecration of the wine.

    Roman Catholics are camped out in and around all the structures of the Church currently occupied by the anti-papacy.

    True Catholics (most) are without the sacraments of chrismation / confirmation, eucharist, orders and viaticum. Just as true Catholics did not resort to the sacraments of the ‘juring’ priests at the time of the French Revolution and its aftermath or at the time of the Arian Crisis.

    There are many priests, however, who can hear confession and absolve. Together with the catechism of Trent, this is the greatest need as I see it.

    Talk of ‘cookies’ etc only scandalizes the ignorant among the novus ordo – many of whom would become or could become Catholics.

    This is the time to seek out the refuge of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to which the promises of salvation and sanctification attatch at this time of the Great Apostasy, at the time antiChrist has power over the sacrifice, the strength and the altars.

  19. babette March 16, 2010 @ 2:58 pm

    Thank you for your excellent work Brother Nat and, William, very well said.

    Best Regards,



  20. R. C. Christian March 16, 2010 @ 3:13 pm

    I suspect this is just part of the dog and pony show for the benefit of cattle/goyim.

    Let us not forget that Jew Hugger Joe is a declared Zionist.

    Irrefutable proof:

  21. R. C. Christian March 16, 2010 @ 3:35 pm

    2 Timothy 3:13 (King James Version)

    13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

  22. R. C. Christian March 16, 2010 @ 4:09 pm

    Charles Giuliani explores the pure evil written in the Talmud on this morning’s show.

    He has a way of getting to meat of the issue in a humorous way. I was laughing my butt off at how absurd that evil book is. It reads like it was written by a bunch of demented and perverted teenagers.

    Go here and click “On Demand” for today’s show:

  23. Zionist Jews are cowardly bullies March 16, 2010 @ 4:44 pm

    Joe Cortina is right.

    I also dealt with Zionist Jews for years. They thrill in giving “secret messages” like this, and they do it often if they can.

    You BETTER BELIEVE these Israeli leaders mean what they say.

    BUT if one stands up to the Jews and shows no fear, they will back down, because they are cowards.

  24. Zionist Jews are mentally ill March 16, 2010 @ 4:50 pm

    Let me point out that the Israeli leaders are mentally ill to perform this stunt.

    It shows what many commentators are saying — that the Zionist Jews cannot tell that they are losing, and will continue their same old tactics, like rats in an exercise wheel endlessly rotating.

  25. Fr. Joseph March 16, 2010 @ 6:27 pm


    You have my FORGIVENESS.

    It was THE LORD Who called me into my Priesthood. It was to my Metropolitan Archbishop Athanasius I was sent.

    It was to my Metropolitan Archbishop that THE LORD had already informed I was ‘on my way’ to him.

    It was my very first Mass – and it WAS a ‘Novus Ordo’ Mass where upon approaching the Altar to being my very first Mass that…

    …the Holy Spirit moved me to the very pit, the very core of my spiritual being to being WAILING and CRYING OUT LOUD and PLEADING TO GOD in great human anguish and sorrow for HIS CHURCH here on earth and all across this World.

    My Metropolitan Archbishop was moved to deep sorrow and the shedding of TEARS.

    And I cried, and I cried, and I cried as I looked down INTO the Chalice of His Divine Blood I had just CONSECRATED for the very first time as a PRIEST of His Church here on earth.

    And the ONLY THING that ‘mattered’ about anything ANYWHERE all across this World of ours and within this ‘Seen All’ of DIVINE Creation was…HIS BLOOD at the very bottom of the Chalice.

    The ONE REAL THING any ordained Priest of His Church here on earth needs to do in order TO EFFECT the Consecration of the Bread and Wine into THE LORD’S OWN Body and Blood is for that Priest to DECLARE the words

    ‘This is My Body’ over the Bread and

    ‘This is My Blood’ over the Wine.

    ANY ordained Priest has the power to confect the Eucharist when he speaks those DIVINE DECLARATIONS over the Bread and the Wine – the WORDS spoken by THE LOGOS Who brought for ALL that we see and can’t see by a DIVINE DECLARATION of His Own Divine Intention!

    Catholic Priests in CONCENTRATION CAMPS during World War II did NOT have the ‘pre-Vatican II’ Missal with them, nor did they have golden chalices arrayed atop fine and mighty marble Altars housed within the regal confines of Gothic or Old Slavonic Cathedrals and Churchs adorned wall-to-wall with blessed and chrismated statues or icons.

    Those PRIESTS only hand their very own TWO HANDS consecrated and annointed by a BISHOP of the Lord’s Church here on earth.

    And those PRIESTS only had scraps of bread and a few RAISINS by which TO DO that which THE LOGOS, GOD INCARNATE charged them to do.

    The RAISINS went into a wee bit of water and was allowed to ‘ferment’ for A WEEK.

    THAT was the ‘Wine’ available to the PRIESTS. And the scraps of bread from their daily rations was the ‘Bread’ available to those PRIESTS.

    And there was NO ‘Missal’ available to them. There was NO marble ‘Altar’ imbedded with a Saint’s FIRST CLASS RELIC.

    And these PRIESTS took that ‘Raisin Wine’ and those SCRAPS of parched bread – and they GAVE THANKS TO GOD…and these PRIESTS simply and reverently took this bread and this raisin-soup into THEIR HANDS, raised their eyes to the Heavens, gave THANKS and PRAISE to our Almighty God and Father in Heaven – and then those PRIESTS DECLARED

    ‘This is My Body’ over the scraps of bread.

    ‘This is My Blood’ over the small portion of raisin-soup-wine.

    And these PRIESTS then went amongst the LAITY who were also prisoners with them – and these PRIESTS gave the OTHER members of Christ’s Mystical Body here on earth CHRIST’S BODY and CHRIST’S BLOOD.

    It is GOD in CHRIST JESUS Who effects His Own Church’s SACRAMENTS of His Church via the physical being and physical actions of HIS CHURCH’S PRIESTS consecrated and ordained TO MINISTER His Divine Sacraments to the peoples of this World He Himself desires TO FORGIVE and to whom He desires to grant ETERNAL LIFE.

    It is CHRIST JESUS Who ministers and acts through His Priests here on earth!

    No two-bit avante garde theologian or anybody from ANY ‘peanut galley’ has the authority or standing to declare, pronounce or declare that CHRIST JESUS cuts or severes His ties with HIS Priests here on earth because ‘they speak the WRONG langauge’ or ‘misspeak during a Mass’ or ‘mispronouce a word of the Liturgy’.

    My Priesthood’s validity is NOT contingent upon YOUR personal judgements or declarations. My Priesthood’s validity is solely contigent upon MY BISHOP and MY BISHOP keeping under his omiphorin.

    If MY BISHOP lifts his omiphorion from ME as one of HIS PRIESTS, then I will have EVERY enemy of Christ Jesus and His Church here one earth comin’ after we with a spiritual VENGENENCE vs. me personally.

    I trust that GOD INCARANTE Who is Jesus, THE CHRIST, will use His Own Divine Powers TO PREVENT my Bishop from ever doing that.

    Yet, if my Bishop WERE to do something like that, I would have but ONE RECOURSE of action – to appeal TO HEAVEN and all of Those in Heaven to NOT LEAVE ME or ABANDON ME in this midst of this evil and fallen ‘World’.

    Now THAT is my ‘Priestly Faith’ in CHRIST JESUS, the Logos, His Eternal and Divine FATHER in Heaven, in God the Holy Spirit, in the MOTHER OF GOD, in St. Michael and the legions of his Warrior Angels.

    I trust that we now clearly ‘understand’ each other.

    And yes – I FORGIVE YOU since it was CHRIST JESUS Himself Who said while dying on His Cross;


    – Fr. Joseph

  26. Paul March 16, 2010 @ 7:59 pm

    Thank you Br. Nathanael for this article.

    To Joe Biden all I can say is “Peti Yaamin Lekhol Davar.”

    It means The fool who will believe anything.

    As I read your article:

    I came across the part where they “Chant” Babble if I may say that. Now I hope most of you know in Matt: 6:7 “Chanting” vain repetition of words is a form of magical pagan incantation in Hinduism and Tibetan Buddhism, as it is in Judaism.

    For example, the rabbis decree “one who recites Parshas Harmon everyday is assured that his food will not be lacking.” Now compare that to Matt: 23:14 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense you make long prayers; therefore you will receive greater condemnation.”

    Before I leave I just want to say after reading this great article and seeing all those Leaders in Darkness, I was compelled to read Ezekiel Chapter 8 — all of it.

    Here is some more info. Read Yevamos 109b:

    By the way the 70 Elders are the Sanhedrin and they are alive and well again in our age
    Also (10) “Shomrei Ha’saf” means closest to the King and (3) “Ro’ei Penei Hamelech” means the Kings advisors.

    Again some great comments here.


    The name for the people of Israel was:

    “Ho Hagios Laos”

  27. Deadmantalking March 16, 2010 @ 8:25 pm

    Fr. Joseph,

    Forgive me — but Jesus himself said call no man “father” (why don’t you call yourself Brother Joseph?)

    [Mt:23:9: And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.]

    Forgive me — but why wasn’t the Fatima prophecy foretold in the Revelation of St. John the Divine, or anywhere else in the synoptic Gospels?

    Forgive me — but why did Benedict XVI appear in a synagogue recently, and give a televised speech wherein he mentioned both “anti-Semitism” AND “anti-Judaism”?

    Forgive me — but how did Communists infiltrate the Church and allow the Second Vatican Council to backslide on the position regarding these self-styled “Jews”?

    Forgive me — but where in the New Testament does it command that the church establish all of these so-called “orders”? (Dominicans, Franciscans, Jesuits, etc. etc.)

    Forgive me — but what did the author of Acts mean when he said:

    Acts:7:48: Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,

    Acts:17:24: God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

    Forgive me — but is it true that in 1548, Pope Paul III authorized the purchase and possession of Muslim slaves in the Papal states?

    Forgive me — but why did the Msgr. of a church in Rome abuse my earthly father when he was an “altar boy?”

    Forgive me — but was it my earthly father that wept crocodile tears, or was it you?

  28. Deadmantalking March 16, 2010 @ 8:52 pm


    Scholastic Canada Ltd. has distributed to certain public schools a book titled “Who Runs This Country, Anyway?”, by Joanne Stanbridge (ISBN 0-439-95730-3 PBK)

    Something quite revealing is printed on page 17, which can be seen here:

    Here is what it says:

    “If you really want to shine, remind your teacher that Canada is a constitutional monarchy. Even the Monarch’s powers are limited by the Constitution. The Constitution is a set of rules that tells how our country’s government will be run.

    “It’s made up of more than twenty-five written documents that were collected over time, plus some VERY IMPORTANT TRADITIONS that AREN’T WRITTEN DOWN ANYWHERE. For example, it doesn’t say anywhere in our Constitution that the prime minister is the head of our government. (Yes, Nathan, that’s really true.) But don’t worry! These UNWRITTEN TRADITIONS are JUST AS STRONG as written laws.”


    Now, what does “unwritten traditions” trumping “written laws” remind us of? Isn’t the Talmud a codification of “unwritten traditions”?

    And, how would we know when a “new” unwritten tradition is being “enacted”? And, if the PM doesn’t run the country, and the Monarch’s powers are limited, then the question remains: “Who runs this country, anyway?”

    Why do we bother with spending so much time and money on electing a PM if he doesn’t run the country?

  29. katman March 16, 2010 @ 9:08 pm

    It looks like Brother Biden is looking at the handshake and Brother Netanyahu is not giving him the correct handshake. Hmmm, not good.

    According to former Mossad Katsa, Victor Ostrovsky there was a Mossad plan to assassinate George H.W. Bush at the Madrid Peace Talks in 1991. But I guess they had a change of plans.

    Frankly I think this whole spiel, is just for public consumption. It is theatre. Jesus said, “How can Satan go against Satan? A house divided cannot stand.” They all work for the good of their father. Biden is a useful idiot and does what he is told just like his boss. Is it possible the entire United States government does not have one person willing to stand up against this evil?

    On another note, I wonder if the reality of the situation is hitting home with the Congressional Black Caucus? While they were useful, they were used as a battering ram against the white western European man here in the States. But now, as their usefulness comes to a end, they are discarded and removed from power by any means necessary.

    To these Zionist Jews, these blacks are “shvartz”. Maybe the realization of what is happening will start to hit home with them. They were used, and now they are no longer any use, and their mere presence around these Zionist Jews is a insult to them, which it always was.

    But, it would appear, that they no longer care what the blacks think about anything. Since they control the media, most of these events will never be heard about, by the sheeple.

    As these useful American Jews step up and allow themselves to be used, I predict that one day, they too, will become expendible and their use will come to a end. Fools they are to think that somehow they are part of something. As Izaak Greenbaum — head of Jewish Agency Rescue Committee located in Germany during World War 2, said on February 18, 1943:

    “One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland”

    Jewish useful idiots become expendible for the good of World Jewry.

    Such is life here.

  30. Akira March 17, 2010 @ 5:17 am

    About the linked news story:

    Judeo-Masonic “Foreign Policy” magazine (FP) was founded in 1970 by Samuel P. Huntington and Warren Demian Manshel (Elder of Zion Henry Kissinger’s old friend from Germany; U.S. Ambassador to Denmark 1978–1981; also co-founded “The Public Interest” with Elder of Zion Irving Kristol; CFR member).

    FP’s editor-in-chief is Moisés Naím (Jew; Venezuela’s former Minister of Trade and Industry; has written for El País, L’Espresso, Jewish NYT, Jewish WP, Judeo-Masonic Newsweek, Judeo-Masonic TIME, Le Monde, Berliner Zeitung, etc.; former director of economic reforms and director for Latin America at the Masonic Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [sic].

    He is former Executive Director of the Judeo-Masonic World Bank; a member of the World Economic Forum’s International Media Council; Chairman of the Group of Fifty; sits on the advisory board of Global Financial Integrity; Director of the National Endowment for Democracy, The International Crisis Group, and Population Action International).

    FP is published by The Jewish Washington Post Company (WPC).

    In 2008, WPC bought FP from the Masonic Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [sic].

  31. Akira March 17, 2010 @ 5:25 am

    Very good article.

    I’d call it “The Jewist State only has Broken Glass to offer.”

    [Yes, The Jewist State.]

    And re:

    “Netanyahu and his Jewish agents in America were deeply aggrieved when Obama went to Cairo on June 4, 2009, for an address to the Muslim world without stopping in Israel.”

    I doubt that’s the case. I’m sure Obama doesn’t do anything without President Emanuel pulling his strings.

  32. Bill in Ohio March 17, 2010 @ 7:32 am


    Im not sure what Mass youve attended, but in the (Tridentine) Latin Traditional Mass I attend, there is No reading from the Old Testament, Ever.

    An Epistle reading and one from the Gospel.

    We also say Friday prayers for the ‘blind and Perfidious Jews’ as a prayer to convert them. This was Standard and done until the Vatican 2 hijacking.

  33. Bruno Mueller March 17, 2010 @ 8:07 am

    Kristallnacht all over again only now it’s them.

    Better watch it America! Like the Nazis who pretended Russia was their friend for as long as it was expedient, then they attacked them. Same here today. Like the crooked cross adorers who threatened all of Europe, so do the new fascists of the Davidic Star.

    I wonder, is their operations manual Mein Kampf? They surely use identical moves lately.

  34. edgarocs March 17, 2010 @ 8:59 am

    Looks like Netanyahu black magic witchcraft for Biden and his group and Obama’s Voodoo CIA KGB Illuminati.

    Zionazi, Iranazi, Chinazi, Palestinianazi, Russcianazi ptb-ptbs are all insane dragging the world to world war three in connection to the 100 dollar bill Clocktower code of Hellfire Club with Benjamin Franklin and Le Merchand, the 4 10 to 2 21 clock in connection to the Clocktower game, and Jennifer Connelly”s movie Phenomena from April 2010 to Feb 2012.



  35. chabib March 17, 2010 @ 9:28 am

    The Jews are responsible for the break up of Hall & Oates, ELO, and the death of Buddy Holly.

  36. mark glenn March 17, 2010 @ 10:36 am

    The Ugly Truth Podcast March 17, 2010

    The one and only Brother Nathanael Kapner of returns for a special program discussing the recent threats made by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu towards the Obama administration.

  37. MIRANDA March 17, 2010 @ 11:08 am

    I most certainly am not vehemently anti-Catholic and how dare he who calls himself Fr. Joseph make such an asinine denuciatory statement about me.

  38. MIRANDA March 17, 2010 @ 11:14 am

    And Bill in Ohio,

    I am so pleased to read your comment. I will try to find that same type of Mass.

    Bless you.

  39. Miranda March 17, 2010 @ 11:41 am

    And thank you Eamon and dear Deadmantalking.

    I agree: The Vatican is Judaized.

  40. Hoff March 17, 2010 @ 11:49 am

    Jewish Conspiracy Proven – by Hoff

    All we Jew-wise people have one thing in common, we have all been ridiculed many times.

    “HO HO HO … a Jewish conspiracy … HO HO HO! Tin hat on.” You know the drill, the smear-slander and ridiculing. Jews do this all the time in the jew operated “media.” First the Jew shows off their power and the next sec they ridicule anyone saying the same thing.

    The whole point is to make people laugh at the very thought that there is a Jewish conspiracy, hence they don’t investigate. They just take the Jew’s own word “that there is no Jewish conspiracy.” This is just like taking a used car salesman’s word that “only an old lady has driven the car to church on Sundays.”

    You just don’t trust a word he says. lf you do your pretty dumb, wouldn’t you say? You trust a used care salesman?

    Communism is a Jewish conspiracy. Communism was written by Jews. Communism world wide was led by Jews. Some 99 percent of all Jews are communists. Except for the Jews’ Talmud nothing could be more Jewish then Communism.

    Communism is an updated version of the Jews’ Talmud. Communist Manifesto is a quick-version of the Jews’ Talmud. lt can be proven with Jew Only sources that Communism is Judaism.

    “Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.”

    (The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935).

    Stephen Wise was a Jewish top dog. One in the elite of the elite Jews in America. This is not some small town rabbi, it’s the heavy guys. l could give you a ton of quotes, but what does it matter if you don’t get it?

    Communism is one hundred procent kosher. Communism is all about making the stupid and ignorant non-Jew to help the Jew in taking control of their country, their state. ln order to trick the stupid and ignorant, the Jews promise the (m)asses, the people whatever they want to hear.

    Communism is all about one thing and one thing only, Jews taking control of the state. Can the Jews do that, than they are king and that is what the Jews want. Total control. Nothing else matters to the Jews, total control of the state, the country.

    The jews tried to take over Russia in 1881, then again in 1905. Then in 1917 the Jews made it and took over Russia and renamed her Sovjet.

    The ONLY thing you need to control in a communist dictatorship is the Secret Police. Take control of the Secret Police and YOU ARE THE STATE! Do that and you can do anything you want. You can kill anyone you want. Anyone that doesn’t obey, just shoot him. Make an example of him and scare the crap out of the (m)asses, that’ll teach them who the Master is.

    The Secret Police in Sovjet from 1917 to 1990 was run lock, stock and barell by Jews. And they just shoot anyone that diden’t obey and the Jews did it by the tens of millions people. Now, if Sovjet was not run by Jews, l don’t know what would make you get it. Communism is all about Jews taking control of the state. And that the Jews did in Russia in 1917.

    Communism is a Jewish conspiracy for world conquest and here is the Jews plan in short. Take over Russia, the worlds biggest country, and turn her into a Jewish proxy war machine, and then try to take over the whole world from Moscow.

    This is what the Jews did. The Jews did take over Russia and used all she got on armament. Sovjet imperialism was in fact Jewish imperialism. All of this is self-evident. The Jews did take over Russia and then the Jews in Moscow said that they were going to take over the world. Sovjet was in Asia, in Africa and in South-America trying to take control of the countries they were in.

    Now, the Jews were in control of Sovjet and tried to conquer the whole world from Moscow. lf that is not a Jewish conspiracy for world conquest l don’t know what will be.

    Communism is evidence that there is a Jewish conspiracy for world domination. Now, the question is not if the Jews can gang up and conspire, the question is: What more conspiracy has the Jews got up their sleeves?

    The Protocols of Zion? l don’t know, but have you read them and can prove they are fake? The Protocol’s are sure as hell a blueprint for a small group to take control of the whole world. The Jews have themself proved that they can conspire on a world wide basis, so why not the Protocol’s?

    l myself do NOT take the Protocol’s as evidence that there is a Jewish conspiracy, but Communism is proof that there is at least one Jewish conspiracy for word conquest.

    Did the Jews tell you that Communism is a Jewish conspiracy? Hell no! Why would the Jews tell you that? That could perhaps make you start thinking, and the Jews don’t want you to do that. The Jews want you to ridicule anyone who says there is a Jewish conspiracy.

    Zionism and Communism are twins and they are both Jewish swindles for world conquest. The Zionist Jews want to conquer the world from Jerusalem, and to do that they must have a proxy war machine and that would be America. What is US imperialism all about? World conquest from White House, Washington DC, USA.

    Some Jews controls the White House, Senate and Congress lock, stock and barrel. You didn’t know that did you? You didn’t know the Jews was in total control of Sovjet either did you? So what do you know? That there is no Jewish conspiracy because the Jews told you that on TV? You trust a used car salesman, too?

    Guess what? The Jews are LYING about everything. The Jews didn’t tell you Communism is a Jewish conspiracy did they? Proven liars so the next question is: What more do the Jews lie about? That Jews don’t have any political power in America?

    The Jews are just like used car salesmen, you can’t trust a word they say.

    “Stalin’s Jews” by Sever Plocker in Ynet, both Jewish.

    “We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish ”,7340,L-3342999,00.html

    The Jews didn’t tell you that on “History Channel” or in school did they? That is LYING. What more do the Jews lie to yoú about?

  41. The Prodigal Son March 17, 2010 @ 1:38 pm


    Are the ‘Protocols of Zion’ a forgery? What is a forgery?

    A forgery is an unauthorized reproduction of an original… so in that sense they may be a forgery since the originals were written in Hebrew.

    But are they completely faked?

    The preponderance of the evidence says NO.

    The ‘Jews’ SAY they are not genuine because they contain certain verses which are very similar to verses in a book called ‘Dialogues in Hell’ by a man named ‘Maurice Joly’…

    But were the ‘Protocols’ copied from the book ‘Dialogues’?

    Or did ‘Joly’ (himself a lying ‘Jew’ plagarist) simply copy portions from the Protocols (which only certain other ‘Jews’ would know) into his book?

    Since it can be shown that ‘Joly’ was a plagarist… I don’t think he would have hesitated to “borrow” from the ‘Protocols’ for his book (which he was certain no ‘Gentiles’ had ever laid eyes on… and was surely convinced that non-‘Jews’ would NEVER see it.)

    — — —

    ‘Now let us continue our investigation. The path we are following is getting warmer – we step on dangerous soil!

    Let us find out who is the gentleman identified as Maurice Joly; the mysterious correspondent (from Constantinople) “incidentally” paid no attention to his identity. Who was this “Frenchman,” the author of the “Dialogues in Hell?”

    This problem is solved by Gottfried zur Beck in his preface to the German edition of the “Protocols.” In which we find that Maurice Joly, according to the record, in his infancy was circumcised as Moses Joel! How strange!’

    (…) ‘4). The Satanical development of ideas of this book is extracted from a still older work, thus proving ‘Joly’ to be a plagiarist himself.

    “The Dialogues Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu” is the title of this older book, published by Franz Duncker at Berlin in 1850. The author of this book was the *Jew* Jacob Venedey.

    He was born in 1805 in Cologne, Germany; expelled from Germany he settled in Paris in 1835…

    Prosecuted by the police for his subversive activities, he was protected and defended (as was the case with ‘Joly’) by Cremieux. Venedey was an intimate friend of Karl Marx (alias Mordechai).’


  42. Stav March 17, 2010 @ 2:34 pm

    Dear Enya,

    You say:

    “The King James Bible does not say anything about Masses, or Popes or Cardinals, or Nuns!!!”

    First off, the King James version of the Bible is not the first or original written Bible, nor, is it the most authoritative source of Christian practice.

    Secondly, what you mention above is only partially true. The truth is, that all practice of the One, True and Original Church, some of which is still shared with the RC is COMPLETELY and TOTALLY in line with Scripture. The truth is like this:

    1) The people who canonized the Holy Bible and thus the King James version, DID practice “Mass” or the Holy Liturgy as they called it.

    2) The people who canonized the Holy Bible, not only supported Monks and Nuns and monasticism/asceticism, but many of them who canonized the Bible WERE ACTUALLY such.

    3) The people who canonized the Holy Bible, did not have a Pope as the RC has it today, but they certainly did have Bishops and Priests and Deacons, with cassocks/robes/beards and all, and again many of them who canonized the Bible WERE ACTUALLY such.

    Realize dear Enya, that where the Bible actually came from, is the One Original Catholic Church, of which the continuation is the Orthodox Churches of today and NOT the RC.

    Also realize, that it is in the least ignorant to KNOW NOTHING about the people who wrote and put together the Bible, and still claim absurd claims about Christianity.

    And realize, that what stands over and above Holy Scripture, is the Holy Tradition passed from the time of Christ Lord and Savior, because it is exactly there where the Holy Scripture and the various practices came from. Thus, if you accept the Bible as Truth, then you should also accept the surrounding circumstances of it’s emergence as Holy. The west, dear Enya, has forgotten this, in part willingly and in our days because of sheer ignorance.

    You also say:

    “The R.C. church is NOT Christian, period.”

    I would say, that in the general sense, of course RCs are Christian but I will also say, that they have a distorted view of the faith. Now, that makes them heretics for sure, but not non-Christian, at least in the larger picture.

    As for the people like you, who illogically believe only in Scripture, I can assure you that you are deluded, to the extent that you ignore it’s source and the method by which it was put together.

    As an example for this, take for example St. John’s Gospel. Just WHO do you think this man was? How do you imagine him practicing Christianity? Do you think he had a Gospel to go by?

    The answer is of course NO, he had no such thing, because it was not even compiled yet. Nor had any of the Christians who lived before the compilation of the Bible as one collected book.

    In fact, the last “chapter” the Apocalypse, was written by St. John, during his last days. And as far as his practice of Christianity goes, listen to this: He lived alone, like a monk, and he practiced “Mass” and for sure, would have supported an organized form of asceticism.

    Dear Enya, your fellow Protestant-like people, are ignoring the fact, that there CAN be Christianity and a Life in Christ without the Bible Scriptures and that what holds true Christianity together (other than Christ Himself of course) is primarily our Holy Traditions.

    You are also making a fatal mistake, to assume that the King James version of the Bible is the beginning and end of all confirmation regarding our faith.

    That is an arrogant mistake, because you are ignoring and disregarding the original form and expression of Scripture. Furthermore, you are not only being arrogant, but you are missing the full GLORY of the Greek Old AND New Testament expressions. As an example, let me ask you this:

    “In the beginning was the Word”

    What does that say to you? How do you understand this? Did you know that the Greek original includes FAR MORE depth in this short sentence that you even can imagine at this point? Realize, that your King James only faith is SERIOUSLY limiting your Life in Christ and personal understanding of Him.

    So, dear Enya as you can see, you are missing something. Something very important. And unless you look for that, you will never experience the fullness of His Church.

    In Christ our Lord,


  43. jgalindes March 17, 2010 @ 4:19 pm

    From Peter Myers website.

    The arguments for and against the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

    Aiming to present the best arguments that the Protocols is a forgery, and the best counter-arguments that the forgery hypothesis has not been proven.

    Please note that Peter’s Website (
    is unavailable today…




  44. kmarie March 17, 2010 @ 5:06 pm

    “Our enemy the devil goes about like a roaring lion seeking whom he may destroy.”


    “If God is for us, who can be against us?”


    “Eye has not seen, ear has not heard, neither has it entered into the heart of man what God has prepared for those who love Him.”

  45. George March 17, 2010 @ 5:33 pm

    This is a comment from Mike Rivero regarding the current “spat” between the DOJ and AIPAC, but it might be relevant to this article as well …

    “Of course, what may really be going on here is that the US is getting ready to attack Iran, and is trying to create the illusion of a diplomatic split with Israel in order to give Israel “deniability” that Israel is behind the push to invade and destroy Iran.”

  46. Stav March 17, 2010 @ 5:40 pm

    Dear Lynda, Roman “Catholics” and all fellow RZN readers/posters

    Firstly, forgive the length of this, believe me, I tried to keep it as short as I could. I am not going to apologize, I have many times now given you the reasons why this seemingly irrelevant matter has actually PRIME relevance to the Zionist problem.

    To be short, I’ll just repeat Br. Nathanael, who said if I remember correctly, that the Zionist threat can ONLY really be fought ultimately by the Church, Which is the Body of Christ our Lord, directed by Him.

    You have many times characterized the Orthodox as being schismatic. As I have explained to you before, the the word schismatic is used to define the part that separated from the whole during a schism. Schism, simply translated from the Greek, means a rip. When a rip occurs, we get for lack of a better word, “riplets” or pieces, that separate. Schismatic is the word used in Greek to define these pieces.

    You have also many times implied or expressed the opinion, that for some unexplained reason, it is the Orthodox who somehow have derailed from the original faith and that it is the Romans who have stuck to the original and correct faith. This is a deeply erring position to take, and I shall prove it below.

    I will now prove to you, without a shadow of a doubt, that the schismatic “Church” is the religious community that calls it self “The Roman Catholic Church.” I will also prove to you, that it is the Roman “Church” that has right from the beginning deviated from the one, original practice and true faith and that as such, it is high time that any conscious “Catholic” realizes this and finds a way to a more complete truth.

    As always, the reason for presenting this, is not only to provide you with a definitive answer personally, but more importantly, to present the rest of the readers here with an answer that provides a good starting point to understanding the whole matter. Here goes:

    PART ONE: Practices that the Romans have changed since the Schism:

    The practices below are presented in almost complete absence of theological commentary. It is done this way because my purpose is to present some easy to see, practices, from which the Roman “church” has departed, and by doing so, making it self schismatic by definition.

    In addition, by looking at the facts below, it is also by definition, that one can see that at least from the practical point of view, the Roman “church” is and has been for about 1000 years NOT ORIGINAL.

    1) Baptism.

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Baptism is performed by the triple immersion n water of the person to be baptized. There are innumerable ancient sites of Baptism where one can clearly verify that baptism was from the beginning performed in this manner.

    Note: the word “baptism” as used even today in modern Greek, always had the same meaning: It means full immersion. Thus, if one talks in Greek about baptizing an item or object, it is clearly and immediately understood to be immersion. There are also clear etymological sources that explain this meaning of the word.

    As performed by the Romans:

    Baptism is now done by Romans by the sprinkling of water on the person to be baptized.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    2) Priests

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Priests keep their hair and beard, as proof of the covenant they have with God. The same goes for Monks.

    This was the practice from the beginning and was inherited in part by the order of jewish priests, who of course no longer exist today.

    Priests wear a rasso, or robe as done from the beginning.

    Priests always were not required to be celibate. Bishops were later and collectively by the whole Church required to be celibate after some time, but early enough in the history of the Church.

    As performed by the Romans:

    Roman priests shave and cut their hair.

    Roman priests, wear shirts and trousers, making them almost indistinguishable from ordinary lay men.

    Roman priests are required to be celibate.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    3) Statues and icons

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Orthodox do not use statues, because they present an all too worldly experience, which is not compatible with the practice of the faith.

    Orthodox, do not use realistic “Western Style” icons of the Saints and our Lord, for the same reasons as presented above.

    This was the practice from the beginning.

    As performed by the Romans:

    Romans do use statues and their main iconography is of western, realistic style. This introduces a worldly sense of what they depict.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    4) Asceticism and Monasticism

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Orthodox do practice Asceticism primarily as an attempt by man to become closer to God by leaving the world behind – completely.

    Monks and Nuns follow strict vows to Never think of the world and Never return to it in spirit and mind. For the more strict vows, this also means in a physical sense.

    As performed by the Romans:

    Romans practice asceticism in a very worldly manner, as their Monks and Nuns, are very active in society and spend nowhere nearly as much time on the primary, what is to be a burning desire, goal of Asceticism.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    5) General conduct of the Church

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Orthodoxy sees the Church s the Body of Christ. It does not engage in social power struggles, banking, worldly affairs etc. etc. It sees it self as a mainly Spiritual body. It was so from the beginning.

    As performed by the Romans:

    The Roman “Church” has Banks, an army, engages in frequent and politically correct statements that have nothing to do with the faith. It engaged in Holy Wars, justifying complete military campaigns as the ‘work of God’. It employs people to form “Intelligence Offices”, spokesmen in the most worldly sense of the word etc. etc.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    6) View of other religions:

    Original practice (still practiced today by the Orthodox):

    Orthodoxy sees other religions as an amalgamation of false beliefs and practices that cannot bring salvation. It views Jews as the people who denied their own Messiah and as such, are in a state where no salvation can be found.

    As performed by the Romans:

    The Roman “Church” repeatedly engages in one to one and equal appreciation of other religions. It has gone as far as to say that Jews do not need Jesus Christ in order to be saved.


    It is the Romans who changed the practice and thus, by definition they are the schismatics and they are the ones who altered a practice passed on by Holy Tradition.

    Other practice differences: Confession, Holy Unction, The non-giving of the Most Holy Blood of Christ to lay people, all are unknown to the Ancient and Original Church which is Orthodoxy today.

    Conclusions from part one:

    We have here at least 6 categories of things which the Romans now do differently to the Original faith. Thus, simply by account of these differences that the Romans have introduced and the steadfast refusal to introduce such differences, it can be plainly and easily be seen that it is the Romans that are now different to the Original Church in terms of mostly external practices.

    But as we shall see, it is clear that these external differences introduced by the Romans, actually reflect and reveal that there are deep, internal differences in doctrine and faith. It can also be plainly seen now, that according to the definition given above, it is the Romans who are schismatics, because of the way they have changed from the original.


    This issue is the most important and core problem and reason for the Schism. It is so important, because, not only is it the reason for the schism itself but the surrounding circumstances of how it came about, proves that it was the Roman “Church” that was and is at fault here, and caused their own separation fromt he Mother Church. And the repercussions are not only practical but also theological.

    The Second Ecumenical Council, affirmed the Holy Spirit to be God “even as the Father and Son are God: who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and together glorified.” That was also an expansion on the Creed first expressed in the First Council.

    In John 15:26 (King James Version) we read:

    26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, He shall testify of me

    It is a little know fact, that this idea of introducing “and from the Son” in the Creed, was heretical by definition, because, the Third Ecumenical Council explicitly stated that not a single word be changed in the Creed. Yet, this did not deter certain people from adding words to it.

    The Orthodox view and the view of the Church from the beginning is that one CANNOT understand the nature of God. One can understand the doctrine e.g. “Light of Light” but NOT the divine mystery of God. Thus, one must stick strictly to our Holy Tradition about God when it comes to defining the nature of God.

    In this case, we are strictly sticking with the words of Christ Himself, who described the Holy Spirit as proceeding from the Father. He did not say otherwise and we may never understand why, and thus we stay fast with what we have been given, to the word, without changing it.

    The view of the Romans, however, is that somehow, the Christian faith is refined and made “more perfect” as more scholastic analysis is applied to it. This is of course a fallacy, and is derived by the atheist (which is essentially satanist) idea that logic can be applied to everything, even God Himself. But we Orthodox believe that God is Over and Beyond Logic, or in other words, His Logic is beyond our understanding.

    So, when the idea came to be introduced as doctrine in Roman Church of the time, in circa year 1009 or 1014, it was the Roman Orthodox who most strongly opposed Pope Benedict imposing this new doctrine on them.

    This is a quite unknown fact, and it shows that the schism initially happened within the confines of Rome itself, between Roman Orthodox Christians and Papists who were looking to inject their own new doctrines into the Church.

    It is also a little known fact, that for 100 years or more before the Great Schism actually officially took place, there was already a doctrinally based schism happening between the Christians of Rome. Thus the great schism can be viewed at least in its initial state, a schism taking place inside the Roman Church, and for very good reason.

    Thus, the Romans once converted to Papists, forgot the original doctrine, which is that the Son is Born of the Father, and the Spirit proceeds from the Father according and very strictly so to scripture. In fact, they started spreading the word, that it was the East, that had removed the words “fillioque” from the Creed, even though historical fact clearly shows the truth to be quite the opposite.

    The theological repercussions of this new doctrine and its surrounding new ideology, that one can analyze and re-analyze the nature of God Himself and derive information previously unknown to us, gave rise to further heresy and further deterioration of doctrine.

    As an example of this, Created Grace was newly introduced as a useful “tool” to explain the new theology emerging in the west. But this gave rise to further and deeper schism and separation. Where there was only one issue to resolve, namely the filioque, now there were new and exotic doctrines appearing year after year.

    Very quickly the Roman Church changed so dramatically that a Christian of the 1100s in the West would have found much more in common with the Orthodox of say the 1400s than his fellow Romans of the same time. This new “church” had now a different view of the Mother of God, Jesus Christ, the Pope the role of the Church, practices etc. etc.

    It is important to see that the issue of the heretical introduction of the “filioque” into the Creed, was not only a naive addition or minor theological difference, but it implied and in fact required a completely different view and belief of God. Instead of believing God to be Mysterious and His nature unknown to us, the new attitude was one of supreme pride and the conviction, that one can put God under an intellectual “microscope” and analyze Him.

    Once this was accepted, everything else fell. It is interesting to note here the clear parallel, between Satan’s own pride and fall, and the intellectual pride of the Roman Church and it’s doctrinal fall from Orthodoxy to Papism.


    The “filioque” is the root of the differences between the Orthodox Church and the Roman Papists. It was clearly a new introduction to the doctrine, which had it’s roots in intellectual pride and a sense that if one analyzes God and Scripture enough, an enhanced, new version can be produced.

    In fact, this attitude, came to clearly say that EVEN JESUS CHRIST’S OWN WORDS CAN BE IMPROVED UPON… Which is what they did by adding words to the Creed about eh Holy Spirit. Once this was done, everything else deteriorated.

    Final conclusions:

    It will be clear to anyone with a clear conscience and pure heart,

    – By reading the small subset of differences;

    – By understanding the difference of spiritual attitude between the OC and RC;

    – By understanding that doctrine is granted by God and not created by mere men, no matter how much stochastic analysis went into it;

    – And and the basis of what are essentially interlinked doctrinal errors on the part of the RC, derived from this prideful attitude;


    There is something clearly very wrong, if so many differences from the Original faith are maintained, yet no remorse and no apparent intention for a true returning to the Original Faith is displayed.

    That there is something clearly wrong, if the Romans Papists are not unrecognizable from what they used to be in the past.

    That there is something deeply wrong, if they actually believe that they can improve upon what was given to us by God, word for word, and graceful act by graceful act.

    This should be a starting point for anyone who wants to know why they are unhappy with so many things in the RC but cannot put their finger on it, or feel it but are afraid to express it.

    Anyone who is truly interested in this matter can verify my claims and also to save space I have not included references. But if it is impossible for you to find it, ask me.


  47. Brother Nathanael March 17, 2010 @ 5:52 pm

    Dear Real Zionist News Family –

    I must be brief as I am a bit still shaken.

    All was going well at Times Sq for 2 hours when I was told by 3 NYPD cops that if I did not move from the median where I always have been standing all the times I go to NYC they would arrest me.

    One cop started mocking the Cross calling it a wooden toy. I asked what law I was breaking and that I had a Constitutional right on the strip and the lead cop said that he was charging me with “disorderly conduct.”

    Cops lie and the lead cop a sergeant started verbally abusing me and I knew that HE WOULD LIE on the police report.

    Many started taking photos of the incident and the lead cop a Seargent ordered them to put the cameras away.

    People got frightened as the cops strong armed me across the street and pushed me into a corner.

    EVERYONE stopped taking pictures by order of the wicked ANTI CHRIST sergeant.

    They demanded my ID saying that they needed it for the arrest report and told me that I was now under arrest.

    One of the cops started mocking me saying “You will now learn your lesson not to answer back to us with your toy cross.”


    I am going back home tomorrow morning and I think I will simply contain my Street Evangelism to Summit County CO where I will still be able to reach many as many tourists always come through.

    The police know me there, I have been through them trying to kick me off and they backed down and I will simply stay there in Summit Cnty.

    I sense that my travel days are over. AND this way I can devote MORE TIME to OUR site, Real Zionist News, as I seem to get the “scoops” on many situations.

    Do keep me in your prayers and I just need to re-evaluate “traveling” with the Holy Cross.

    I do not want to deal with WICKED, BLASPHEMING cops any longer.

    +Brother Nathanael

  48. R. C. Christian March 17, 2010 @ 5:56 pm

    Santa Fe Police Confront Man for Open Carrying Legally:

  49. Wilson March 17, 2010 @ 6:17 pm

    I didn’t hear about the broken mirror and the lights going out from any other news source.

    Biden looked fearful and insulted if I may say so. No reason to be fearful, the whole world hates Israel. No reason to feel insulted, either. Israel insults everybody.

    It is evil and can do no good. There is no camaraderie with a beast. Stop trying to talk/reason/relate to it! It kills, destroys, immolates. That is all it knows how to do. There is no self defense of “Jewish persecution.”

    We know that is a lie. The Jews are the persecutors who, historically, have gotten thrown over a couple of times.

    The donation feature. Does it go through with just a click of that yellow button on the bottom. It didn’t go to a screen acknowledging receipt or anything….

    Thanks much for the research and writing.

  50. Brother Nathanael March 17, 2010 @ 6:21 pm

    @ Wilson –


    Simply Click on the Green Credit Card at the Top of this article or CLICK HERE:


  51. The Prodigal Son March 17, 2010 @ 7:00 pm

    Dear Br. Nathanael,

    I wish I lived near you!

    You need help with your holy vision to hold the Cross high! What you need is someone to ‘document’ these encounters w/ these crooked loser cops.

    If I lived near you – I would volunteer to go with you on your ‘Street Evangelism’ outings… but instead of openly standing with you – I would keep some distance away from you…

    Then record on video as soon as any cops or anyone came anywhere near you! That’s why they’re scared of the cameras – they can lie… but video documentation doesn’t lie!

    You might have to allow yourself to be arrested for a couple of hours… but afterwards those cops would have to answer for their UN-CONSTITUTIONAL actions.

    Remember Rodney King?

    I don’t know if this site is of any use to you – but you should check it out.

    “About Cop Block

    Cop Block is a decentralized organization that highlights cops breaking the law and the action taken to seek accountability.

    We hope to be a the website/organization for people who are looking to rid police departments of their double standard.

    You don’t have anymore rights because you carry a badge.”

    — — —

    God be with you Br. Nathanael… Don’t let these God-less (probably Masonic) cops stop you in your mission!

    Down with anti-Christ cops!

    UP with Br. Nathanael and the Holy Cross of Jesus Christ!!

  52. Wilson March 17, 2010 @ 7:11 pm

    Rejoice, and be EXCEEDING glad: for GREAT is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

  53. The Prodigal Son March 17, 2010 @ 7:16 pm

    Here we go…

    Netanyahu’s Brother-in-Law: “Obama’s an Anti-Semite”


    ‘( Dr. Hagi Ben-Artzi, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s brother-in-law, labeled U.S. President Barack Obama an anti-Semite in two radio interviews Wednesday.

    The time has come to tell the truth.” Dr. Ben-Artzi told Arutz-7 radio (Hebrew). “I understand the Prime Minister’s reaction to me, but the truth must be told.

    Obama is an anti-Semite.” He said that Israel is dealing with “a president who was educated by anti-Semitic preacher Jeremiah Wright.”

    He also told IDF Army Radio that Wright (pictured) is “anti-Israeli, anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic.” Obama was a devotee of Wright for two decades but distanced himself from the preacher during the presidential campaign two years ago.

    Dr. Ben-Artzi told Arutz-7 that the United States is important to Israel from both the economic and security standpoints, but when “the United States makes demands on Jerusalem, the time has come to tell the truth — we are talking about an anti-Semite.”

    He said that Prime Minister Netanyahu must follow the course of his predecessors since all of Jerusalem was restored to Israel in 1967. “Once the Americans tried to intervene in anything related to Jerusalem we told them one simple word: No.’

  54. Brother Nathanael March 17, 2010 @ 7:20 pm

    Dear Prodigal Son –

    I have been through this before. I have BEEN ARRESTED BEFORE.

    I was forbidden to call a Bailbondsmen for 24 hours after being stripped naked and humiliated and my liscence taken from me.

    I dont want to be in a NY jail for another 24 hours with wicked cops BLASPHEMING the Holy Cross.

    My mission will continue in Summit Cnty with thousands of tourists coming in throughout the year.

    We are now dealing no longer with just your garden variety wickedness from our depraved society BUT with AUTHORITATIVE wickedness.

    I do not have the money or the wherewithal to deal with this any longer. WE ARE NOW IN A GUARANTEED POLICE STATE and a MILITARY/ZIONIST DICTATORSHIP.

    I forgot to mention that only one half hour prior to the police showing up a Military Helicopter flew over Times Sq.


  55. The Prodigal Son March 17, 2010 @ 8:04 pm

    I’m sorry Br. Nathanael…

    I really wish there was something I could do!

    Dear God – help us.

  56. The Brainy zek March 17, 2010 @ 8:51 pm

    I cannot adequately put into words the deep commisery I feel for your circumstances suffered in scum Zionist New York City!!

    On the flip side, BROTHER NATE, your shining countenance of LIGHT for JESUS CHRIST GLOWS BEYOND setbacks and your determination for TRUTH will rise to the top!!

    The 886,000 hits on the RZN site did not mature like a weed out of the ground but by the MAGNIFICANCE IN TRUTH EXPOUNDED UPON BY BROTHER NATHANAEL KAPNER!!


  57. Michael K. March 17, 2010 @ 9:00 pm

    This is Mike’s wife.

    Mike tells me there are two things we can do about sin. One is to forgive, the other is to shun it.

    These are tough times, and Christ deserves our attention more than anyone or anything in our lives. Our energy is precious, and our hearts, ourselves given to Christ in prayer every morning, prayer that God will fill us each with the burning desire to do His will, well, kinda like going on auto pilot.

    I like your response, Br N. and staying home, praying, writing poetry, telling everyone I know how much I love and depend on Christ, knowing I am full of what God ordains, Love for my fellow man, but intelligence to give my energy to God, and not away to pigs to trample like pearls. ~ Karen Kelley

  58. brother M March 17, 2010 @ 9:25 pm

    A night of broken glass…TOO much!

  59. Hoff March 17, 2010 @ 11:38 pm

    “It is the proclaimed aim of world Communism and its traitors within the ranks of Christendom, to demoralize the Christian world, and thus destroy all opposition to communism.

    “The conspiracy against the Christian World comes direct from the Communist camp, but was initiated in the “Synagogue of Satan” (Rev. 2:9), we know as International Zionism.”

  60. Lynda March 18, 2010 @ 1:41 am

    Yes, Br Nathanael – it is as you say.

    The nations that once were Christian have passed under the shadow of AntiChrist.

    “God is going to punish the world for its sins by means of the famine, war and the persecution of the Church and of the Holy Father.”

    The worldlings who have chosen to be as the Jews say – ‘the goyim cattle’ won’t care as long as they have cable and beer and NFL.

    But the Christians know.

    The Roman Catholic Church in Eclipse salutes you.

    The holy angels envy the sacrifices and humiliations you have chosen freely to suffer for the exaltation of the Holy Cross in the face of AntiChrist.

    Now, those who can come to you personally to assist must be found.

    The Holy Rosary of the Bl Virgin will be prayed around the world for this specific intention and the Immaculate Heart of our Bl Virgin Mother of Christ will resolve this difficulty.

  61. Nicolae March 18, 2010 @ 5:11 am


    The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews

    by Roi Sharon

    Jewish settlers cut a Palestinian boy’s arm off for throwing stones. This also is, according to Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, a permitted act under Jewish Law and Jewish “religion.”

    When is it permissible to kill non-Jews?

    The book “Torat ha-Melekh” [The King’s Teaching – INT], which was just published, was written by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the dean of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in the community of Yitzhar near Nablus, together with another rabbi from the yeshiva, Yossi Elitzur. The book contains no fewer than 230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew.

    Although the book is not being distributed by the leading book companies, it has already received warm recommendations from right-wing elements, including recommendations from important rabbis such as Yitzhak Ginsburg, Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef, that were printed at the beginning of the book.

    The book is being distributed via the Internet and through the yeshiva, and at this stage the introductory price is NIS 30 per copy. At the memorial ceremony that was held over the weekend in Jerusalem for Rabbi Meir Kahane, who was killed nineteen years ago, copies of the book were sold.

    Throughout the book, the authors deal with in-depth theoretical questions in Jewish religious law regarding the killing of non-Jews. The words “Arabs” and “Palestinians” are not mentioned even indirectly, and the authors are careful to avoid making explicit statements in favor of an individual taking the law into his own hands.

    The book includes hundreds of sources from the Bible and religious law. The book includes quotes from Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, one of the fathers of religious Zionism, and from Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli, one of the deans of the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, the stronghold of national-religious Zionism that is located in Jerusalem.

    The book opens with a prohibition against killing non-Jews and justifies it, among other things, on the grounds of preventing hostility and any desecration of God’s name. But very quickly, the authors move from prohibition to permission, to the various dispensations for harming non-Jews, with the central reason being their obligation to uphold the seven Noahide laws, which every human being on earth must follow.

    Among these commandments are prohibitions on theft, bloodshed and idolatry. [The seven Noahide laws prohibit idolatry, murder, theft, illicit sexual relations, blasphemy and eating the flesh of a live animal, and require societies to institute just laws and law courts – INT]

    “When we approach a non-Jew who has violated the seven Noahide laws and kill him out of concern for upholding these seven laws, no prohibition has been violated,” states the book, which emphasizes that killing is forbidden unless it is done in obedience to a court ruling. But later on, the authors limit the prohibition, noting that it applies only to a “proper system that deals with non-Jews who violate the seven Noahide commandments.”

    The book includes another conclusion that explains when a non-Jew may be killed even if he is not an enemy of the Jews. “In any situation in which a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created,” the authors state. “When a non-Jew assists a murderer of Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a non-Jew’s presence causes danger to Jews, the non-Jew may be killed.”

    One of the dispensations for killing non-Jews, according to religious law, applies in a case of din rodef [the law of the “pursuer,” according to which one who is pursuing another with murderous intent may be killed extrajudicially] even when the pursuer is a civilian.

    “The dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly,” the book states. “Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer.

    “A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer.”

    Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur determine that children may also be harmed because they are “hindrances.” The rabbis write as follows: “Hindrances – babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force.

    “Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”

    In addition, the children of the leader may be harmed in order to apply pressure to him. If attacking the children of a wicked ruler will influence him not to behave wickedly, they may be harmed. “It is better to kill the pursuers than to kill others,” the authors state.

    In a chapter entitled “Deliberate harm to innocents,” the book explains that war is directly mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

    Retaliation also has a place and purpose in this book by Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur. “In order to defeat the enemy, we must behave toward them in a spirit of retaliation and measure for measure,” they state. “Retaliation is absolutely necessary in order to render such wickedness not worthwhile. Therefore, sometimes we do cruel deeds in order to create the proper balance of terror.”

    In one of the footnotes, the two rabbis write in such a way that appears to permit individuals to act on their own, outside of any decision by the government or the army.

    “A decision by the nation is not necessary to permit shedding the blood of the evil kingdom,” the rabbis write. “Even individuals from the nation being attacked may harm them.”

    Unlike books of religious law that are published by yeshivas, this time the rabbis added a chapter containing the book’s conclusions. Each of the six chapters is summarized into main points of several lines, which state, among other things:

    “In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noahide laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents.”

    Even though the authors are careful, as stated, to use the term “non-Jews,” there are certainly those who could interpret the nationality of the “non-Jews” who are liable to endanger the Jewish people.

    This is strengthened by the leaflet “The Jewish Voice,” which is published on the Internet from Yitzhar, which comments on the book:

    “It is superfluous to note that nowhere in the book is it written that the statements are directly only to the ancient non-Jews.” The leaflet’s editors did not omit a stinging remark directed at the GSS, who will certainly take the trouble to get themselves a copy.

    “The editors suggest to the GSS that they award the prize for Israel’s security to the authors,” the leaflet states, “who gave the detectives the option of reading the summarized conclusions without any need for in-depth study of the entire book.”

    One student of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in Yitzhar explained, from his point of view, where Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur got the courage to speak so freely on a subject such as the killing of non-Jews.

    “The rabbis aren’t afraid of prosecution because in that case, Maimonides [Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135–1204] and Nahmanides [Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, 1194–1270] would have to stand trial too, and anyway, this is research on religious law,” the yeshiva student said. “In a Jewish state, nobody sits in jail for studying Torah.”


  62. hvt March 18, 2010 @ 5:47 am

    Brother Nathanael…

    What does it matter that the heathen rage?
    All is calm within my soul.
    What ineffect their acts of rage have upon
    The heart of obedience’s mold!

    In the world, but not of it…
    Attacked from all quarters, yet not marked.
    His grace has been most sufficient
    For all needs on this journey embarked.

    Peace, be still, His presence whispers…
    To the heart given wholly to Him.
    Rest in His hull…your course is charted,
    And your sails He Himself does trim.

    In that day when the storms no longer persist…
    And the missiles of evil no longer exist…
    In the full…you will know…
    That all weapons formed against you…
    Were stayed, or detracted…
    By a Man known as Truth.

  63. Dick March 18, 2010 @ 7:42 am

    Br. N,

    Thank you for another great article. Your analysis has continued to be reasonable. Rather than painting the entire world with the broad brush of the “New World Order,” you judiciously look at reality and report.

    If Biden is such a “Zionist” why did he vote NO on the Iraq war resolution? He’s not my favorite person, but on the whole has been pretty reasonable on foreign affairs. I’d say the same for Hillary Clinton. She pays lip service when needed, but stands with the US when the going gets tough.

    Obama is busy working on his jump shot.

    The game is how to neutralize Israel (and the British financial empire) without igniting a nuclear war. Unfortunately this requires careful diplomacy over a long period of time.

    We should pray for the souls of “Zionists” that they’ll give up their dreams of ruling the world with an iron rod and recognize a win-win situation when they see it.

  64. GreyLmist March 18, 2010 @ 7:48 am

    “The “broken glass” and the “moments of darkness” that Biden experienced were not chance events.”


  65. solobiblia March 18, 2010 @ 8:05 am


    My dear brothers in Christ.

    Firstly, I feel at heart that is chased by big brother, Brother Nathanael shows everyone there in America the blessed cross of our Lord and model Jesus.

    This would be expected, since we are in the last days of these diabolical things. No system prevents that Christians feel sadness to see one of our dear brothers being persecuted.

    But your work, Brother Nathanael, and persecution are not useless to the Lord, and perhaps very soon all those who followed him and he and we also pursued. Amor Christian love and blessings to you Brother Nathanael, a light in the darkness.

    Acts 5:29. But Peter and the apostles said in reply, “We must obey God rather than men.”

    Which is the true Church of Jesus Christ?

    The oldest traditions by which it is not the true religion. The Pharisees were traditions, but killed Jesus.

    An observing person, concerned about God, truth and eternity has reason to be perplexed. Why is Christendom fragmented? Are some churches right, and some wrong? Does it make a difference?


    There is only one place to go for answers about the church. The Bible, the word of God, tells all about God’s church, and it clearly presents one church! From the very first of the Bible we find God’s oneness stressed, and the unity of His followers taught.

    The harmony of God’s creation is revealed in Genesis 1:31 “…it was very good.” God is not a God of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33). Deuteronomy 6:4 is one of many passages which teach the oneness of God. Genesis 2:24 reveals the beginning of marriage and says the man and wife:…shall be one flesh.”

    An inspired apostle, Paul uses the Divine institution of marriage to illustrate the nature of the church, which is His body (Ephesians 1:22, 23; Colossians 1:18). The figures of the body and the oneness of husband and wife carry through many verses of Ephesians 5.

    Paul culminates the comparison by saying,”…I speak in regard of Christ and of the church” (Eph. 5:32). The Bible says “There is one body,…one spirit,…one hope,…one Lord,…one faith,…one baptism,…one God…: (Eph. 4:4-6). Jesus prayed for unity of his people, “that they may all be one” (John 17:21).

    For further identification of that one church we look briefly to Old Testament prophecies: Both Isaiah and Micah speak of a special kingdom (future) and describe it as “the mountain of Jehovah’s house” (Isaiah 2:2,3; Micah 4:1,2).

    These predictions designated the beginning place as Zion, or Jerusalem, and a message called “the word of Jehovah.” Jesus said the Kingdom would come during his generation, and that it would come with power (Mark 9:1).

    The great Pentecost occasion recorded in Acts 2, fulfills all of these predictions, and from that time forward the New Testament speaks of the church as being in existence (Acts 2:46,47; 20:28; 1 Cor. 16:19). Matthew 16:18,19 and Acts 20:25-28 use interchangeably the terms “kingdom” and “church.” The first letter to Timothy (3:15) calls the church “the house of God.”

    None would deny God’s relationship to the church, but in a very special sense it is Christ’s church. Jesus said, “…I will build my church;” (Matt. 16:18). The word “church” is singular.

    The passage in Acts 20:28 says the Lord purchased the church “with his own blood,” and Ephesians 1:23 calls it “his body.” The church is a living organism with Christ the head and Christians members of that body.

    So undenominational was that original church that it was sometimes spoken of simply as “the Way” (Acts 9:2). The basic meaning of the original Greek word for church was “the called out ones.” The New Testament pictures one universal church with one common message:

    “And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to the whole creation. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned” (Mark 16:15, 16).

    The members of this one body, or way, were scattered everywhere and as they met in their respective geographic locations they were called, in a local congregational sense, “churches of Christ” (Romans 16:16).

  66. JohnZ March 18, 2010 @ 8:09 am

    Biden makes me ashamed to be an American.

  67. chabib March 18, 2010 @ 9:34 am

    Did the Zionism/Israel cause the fall of the Mayan and Inca Empires ?

  68. jgalindes March 18, 2010 @ 12:44 pm

    Chabib, I’ll risk to answer your obviously ironic question.

    Of course Zionism/The State of Israel were not physical entities then (c.1500) but Jews, and what could be worse, Marranos, converts, Crypto-Jews, Cristianos Nuevos, etc were there, and a careful study of The Spanish Conquest will reveal their bloody hand, the Deicides’ hand…in the slaughter of the primitive inhabitants of Central and South America.

    Even Colombus’ enterprise was financed by several Jewish converts and his expeditions were crowded with Marranos.

    Their unlimited thirst for silver, gold and the use of forced labor/slavery were certainly the results of their machinations.

    The beauty (for them) is that the Spaniards and the Roman Catholic Church took the whole blame and passed to history as the supreme evildoers of the American aborigines.

    In realities, that worked marvelously as a vengance, for having been expelled from “Sepharad”, their second mother land, a place where they prospered under the protection of the Morisc rulers.

    An expulsion necessary to the Spanish survival, not kidding.

    And they truly consolidated their modern fortune in the Northern part of Europe with the stained gold and silver mined with the demonic sacrifice of nearly 100 million American natives.

    Serious researchers will show that the incipient banking industry in Amsterdam, and later in London, originated precisely there (i.e. Potosi a mountain in present Bolivian territory where the Indians worked mining silver and gold till they died, literally).

  69. Peggy Brabender March 18, 2010 @ 1:05 pm

    Brother Nathanael,

    What they did to me was so horrible that I have never gotten over it.

    But my natural resilience kept me going even though I suffered acutely and still do.

    You need to talk to somebody.

    They have never given up harassing me, and I know what it is like to suffer from the Zionist Jews.

    Like I said, you need a friend to talk to.

  70. charlie March 18, 2010 @ 2:02 pm

    “USA insulted by Israel Occupation of Gaza”:

    “Christian Zionism”:

  71. jgalindes March 18, 2010 @ 2:34 pm

    Googled “Peggy Brabender,” first result:

    “…One of the thoughts that passed through my mind is that Peggy could be used in a manner similar to Mark Chapman. Specifically, the Jews may be pushing for her to meet with me, and then the Jews would be able to kill both of us and make it appear as a murder and suicide by a mentally ill woman…”

  72. The Brainy zek March 18, 2010 @ 2:40 pm

    Brother Nate:

    Another great post in truth!! Thank you, SIR!

    Americans must nearly PUKE IN DISGUST knowing that the Bush administration and his AIPAC-led congress passed legislation giving Israel 30 billion of American workers’ taxpayer dollars for the next ten years!

    We can’t spend money to straighten our housing mortgage mess at home, but we can persecute the Palestinians and steal from the Palestinians more land from the West Bank to build luxury homes for scum Zionist Jew settlers who cut the arms off kids who throw rocks in protest!!

    More everyday worldwide America is suffering a reputation of SICK! SICK! SICK! SICK!

  73. charlie March 18, 2010 @ 3:15 pm

    “Israel Friable Facts.” —

    “If Americans Knew What Israel is Doing.” —

    “Israeli Soldier Palestinian Girl” —

    “Occupation 101” —

    Gaza: The Killing Zone —

  74. Peggy Brabender March 18, 2010 @ 4:37 pm

    To jgalindes:

    Read what Eric Hufschmid wrote more carefully.

    No one dislikes Eric except for the Criminal Zionist Jews. Eric is smart, and he tells the truth, but you have to read carefully what he writes to understand it.

    Also, if you want to see the police reports I filed on these incidents of harassment by Zionist-inspired people or the like, get in touch with me.

    I am not mentally ill and it is slanderous of you to say so. Peace, brother.

    Peggy Brabender

  75. The Prodigal Son March 18, 2010 @ 8:55 pm



  76. R. C. Christian March 18, 2010 @ 11:59 pm

    I just posted a comment at asking why super self professed truth teller AJ isn’t posting any of the “Israel did 911” stories that are all over the web right now.

    I said if they didn’t believe me they could just Joogle it and see for themselves…they took my post down for some reason, lol.

    Everybody should spam his sites with comments asking why they won’t post any evidence about Israel/Mossad doing 911. I’m going to try to call in and ask Alex if he has heard about all the credible people saying 911 was clearly a Mossad Jew Job.

    Everybody should spread this link far and wide:

  77. Peggy Brabender March 19, 2010 @ 12:23 am

    Busted wide open, for all the world to see, and still here and still free.

    I repeat, if anyone wants to know my real story, contact me.

    There is plenty of proof, and it is fascinating reading. It shames the criminal Zionist Jews, not me!

    Peggy Brabender

  78. Hoff March 19, 2010 @ 12:38 am

    Peter Myer

  79. R. C. Christian March 19, 2010 @ 12:51 am


    Eric is stuck in a rut, no longer able to grasp new realities.

    He thinks we need to start killing babies if they are not perfect. I guess he gets to choose which babies aren’t perfect enough to allow them to live.

    He’s cracked.

  80. charlie March 19, 2010 @ 1:09 am

    This kid, just like the Palestinian woman in the above video, does what whole armies, governments and nations the world over should do.

  81. jgalindes March 19, 2010 @ 4:33 am

    Nicolae, again a fantastic observation of yours.

    I was asking myself if any of our “civilized” countries would allow those (or any other similar) satanic Rabbis to travel or live in our territories.

    Certainly orthodox Judaism must be first in our watch-out list in the inmediate future.

    Any possibility of obtaining a copy (even in Hebrew, of course) of that piece of absolute evil crap by us, the “victims”?

    Sincerely it is beyond any sane understanding.

    And still there are millions of idiots the world around supporting Israel’s criminal behaviour.

  82. jgalindes March 19, 2010 @ 5:43 am

    Interview with Elliot Abrams

    Morning Newsmagazine, IDF Radio, March 16 2010 07:11

    Micha Friedman: Elliot Abrams is a name that hasn’t been in the news for some months, because the man, a key figure in the George W. Bush Jr. administration, hasn’t been in the news since the administration went over to the Democrats headed by Obama.

    Abrams, a warm Jew, who is involved up to his ears in the Israeli-Palesitnian conflict, gave an interview today to Bar Shem Or, our foreign affairs correspondent, and says some particularly harsh things about his president, Barack Obama. Good morning to Bar Shem Or.

    Bar Shem Or: Hello Micha, good morning. Senior officials in Washington continue to attack Benjamin Netanyahu. The liberal media justified the White House’s actions, but this morning we are bringing you different voices from America. We held a special interview with Elliot Abrams, who played key roles during the Bush administration and is considered a foreign relations expert. He is also very close to the former president.

    Among other things Abrams served as the deputy national security adviser. He was responsible for the Middle East. He is a conservative Republican and has a lot of resentment towards the current president and his advisors, and he is a Jew.

    This morning he tells us the crisis between Israel and America was not created by Netanyahu’s decisions but only by Barack Obama.

    Elliott Abrams [English]: The Obama administration is to blame for creating this crisis. There was no real reason for it. If it continues it will turn into a strategic mistake because it will really harm the relationship between the United States and Israel.

    BSO [Hebrew]: Blame for creating the crisis is all the Obama administration’s, says Abrams. Obama had no real reason to create it. Therefore if this crisis continues, it will be a strategic mistake that harms the US-Israel relationship. We asked Abrams why he thinks Obama decided to create this crisis, and here is his very surprising answer:

    Elliott Abrams [English]: The administration was very hostile to the Netanyahu government. They were hostile before he did anything. So what argument you can make is that they really don’t like dealing with the Netanyahu government and that they want to see if they can get rid of it and bring down the coalition.

    BSO [Hebrew]: The Obama administration was hostile to Netanyahu from the beginning, even before Netanyahu had done anything. Therefore the theory I can think of, says Abrams, is that the Obama administration simply does not like, and does not want to deal with Netanyahu, and therefore it is trying to get rid of him and to bring down his right-wing coalition. Beyond political considerations, Abrams claims that the current situation harms the peace process and toughens the Palestinians’ positions.

    Elliott Abrams: If the White House is saying, ‘this is terrible, this is a crisis,’ of course the Palestinians are going to say the same thing. It’s very bad for the possibility of negotiations because it means the Palestinians will demand more and more preconditions.

    BSO [Hebrew]: If the White House claims that building new housing units in East Jerusalem is going to say the same thing. The latest admonitions by senior White House officials harm the negotiations because they actually make the Palestinians climb up higher trees and demand more preconditions.

    Abrams claims that during the Bush administration the term “preconditions” did not exist in the lexicon of the negotiation process. But that whole approach was invented by the current administration, and here is a very interesting point that Abrams brings up from the past, which can even be called a kind of full disclosure. When I worked in the White House, Abrams tells us, we knew that we must not demand Israel freeze construction in East Jerusalem.

    Elliott Abrams [English]: The notion that a government of Israel was going to agree that there would not be any additional construction by Israelis in Jerusalem, I think is completely unrealistic, which is why we never demanded that. We understood that it was the nation’s capital, so the notion that you would impose a construction ban on…

    BSO [Hebrew]: We in the Bush administration understood that the notion that the government of Israel would agree to stop building in East Jerusalem was unrealistic, which is why we never demanded that. The Bush administration understood that it is the capital of Israel and therefore the idea to impose a construction ban in the capital, to impose that decision only on Jews, was not realistic.

    We asked Abrams whether he foresees a deterioration of relations. He answers us that this is going to be a very difficult year. He has one last message that he wants to convey to the current administration:

    Elliott Abrams [English]: History suggests that Israel is much more flexible when it feels the most secure. What the Obama administration is doing is making Israel feel less secure.

    BSO [Hebrew]: History has shown that Israel acts more flexibly when it feels secure. The Obama administration is making Israel feel less secure. This will definitely not help bring peace to the region. That was a special interview this morning with Elliot Abrams, a former senior Bush administration official.

    Micha Friedman: And since the current crisis between Israel and the US has a historic dimension, as our ambassador to the US Michael Oren told us, let’s go a little further back to the Bush Senior administration, which was the lowest point in the relations between the two countries, surely in the last 20 years.

    Reevaluation, cancellation of loan guarantees, the American pressure that forced Prime Minister Shamir to go to the Madrid conference against his will. Thank you, Bar.

  83. jgalindes March 19, 2010 @ 5:51 am

    Foxman: Don’t blame the Jews

    ADL chairman speaks out against argument that Israel endangers US soldiers.

    Israel should immediately battle a charge emerging in the US that its actions are endangering the lives of US soldiers, because it is a particularly “pernicious” argument that “smacks of blaming the Jews for everything,” Anti-Defamation League National Chairman Abe Foxman said on Monday.

    Foxman, in an interview with The Jerusalem Post, was replying to an emerging theme that has run through the public discussion in the US of the Interior Ministry’s announcement of plans to build 1,600 housing units in northeast Jerusalem’s Ramat Shlomo neighborhood: that Israel’s actions could cost the lives of American soldiers.

    Eytan Gilboa, a political science professor at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan and a specialist on US-Israeli relations, said the government needed to frontally counter this argument because it risked eroding support for Israel among the US public.

    US Vice President Joe Biden was quoted by Yediot Aharonot last week as telling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in an angry exchange over the Ramat Shlomo incident, that “this is starting to get dangerous for us.”

    “What you’re doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,” Biden was quoted as saying. “That endangers us and it endangers regional peace.”

    On Saturday, the Foreign Policy magazine Web site ran a story saying that the commander of the US Central Command, Gen. David Petraeus, sent a briefing team to the Pentagon at the beginning of the year “with a stark warning: America’s relationship with Israel is important, but not as important as the lives of America’s soldiers.”

    And on Sunday, ABC News senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper asked US President Barack Obama’s top aide David Axelrod twice whether “Israel’s intransigence on the housing issue put the lives of US troops at risk.”

    Axelrod said he wouldn’t put it in those terms.

    “This is probably one of the most serious charges that we have ever heard,” Foxman said.

    “Israel is a country that has never asked American soldiers, even in its darkest moment, to risk its lives to defend it. From time to time there have been suggestions of security pacts, where the US would have to come to Israel’s aid, and all the leaders of Israel have said that the last thing they would want is for US soldiers to risk their lives to defend Israelis,” he said.

    The charge that supporting Israel endangers US soldiers, Foxman said, comes from the “linkage fantasy,” a point of view that “if you just resolve this conflict, everything else will fall into place: Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, America’s war with fundamentalist Islam.”

    Gilboa, meanwhile, said that if not combated aggressively, this argument – if it gains traction among the American public – could undermine the widespread support in the US for Israel.

    “All Americans support their troops,” he said, adding that this particular argument was “very dangerous.”

    The logic behind the argument is that the US feels it needs to maintain the pro-Western Arab block for the scheduled withdrawal of American troops from Iraq in August, and then later from Afghanistan, and that this block will crumble without a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Gilboa said.

    “This is not the case,” he argued. “This logic ignores the interest the pro-Western Arab countries have in maintaining good relations with the West, and in preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons.”

    Gilboa said this argument might be an excuse being used by the US military to cover up its failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. He said he didn’t think the Ramat Shlomo project was important to al-Qaida fighting the US in Iraq, or to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
    “It is complete nonsense,” he said.

    “This is dangerous, because it could hurt public opinion toward Israel, and increase anti-Semitism. There is a great need to do something,” he said, adding that US soldiers were being killed in Iraq because of US policies, not Israeli ones.

    This was one issue Netanyahu needed to address at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington next week, Gilboa said.

  84. Hufschmid is not cracked, not even dented March 19, 2010 @ 6:27 am

    Eric is not cracked. He has never killed any babies.

    He is trying to tell us that the world’s population is getting too large. Thousands of children die every day of starvation.

  85. Michael Korn March 19, 2010 @ 7:42 am

    This is a very frightening report.

    Coupled with the reports of Roy Tov ( ), it seems that we are all in for a rough ride.

    What is amazing about the Dispensationalists is that they actually are close to the truth about Armageddon in the Middle East. Where they go wrong is imagining that the forces of evil will attack innocent IsNOTreal, rather than recognizing that IsNOTreal is the source of the Satanic outpouring. (We also can refer to it as Ersatz Yisrael or U$rAel)

    I have been reading a book on Christian History which persuades me that another error of the Dispensationalists is that we are not in the Armageddon Chapt. 19 of Revelation stage of history, but rather in the Gog and Magog after Satan is loosed Chapt. 20 of Revelation stage.

    It appears that the rider on the White Horse whose name is True and Faithful alludes to St. Constantine, another one whom the Dispensationalists love to deride. Tell me how is Constantine less admirable than Cyrus the Great, whom Isaiah calls “The Lord’s Anointed”?

    Anyway, another amazing point I learned from this survey book is that, quite contrary to his Stoical nature, Marcus Aurelius unleashed a vicious persecution against the early Christians in Rome.

    Then, after some investigation on the Come-And-Hear website, I discovered that Judah the “Prince” [of darkness], who compiled the Mishna, was a close friend of either Aurelius or Aurelius’ adoptive father, the previous Roman Emperor.

    So it seems more than likely that the great Pharisaic rabbis influenced the Roman leaders to exterminate Christians, whom the rabbis viewed as hated heretics. The book by Philip Moore, The Messiah Conspiracy, suggests that there were as many as six million Christian martyrs in the period prior to Constantine.

    Online version:

    This suggests an even more amazing idea: perhaps the Nazi Holocaust was a measure for measure retribution for the Jewish instigations leading to the murders of so many millions of early Christians? Perhaps it was the final endtimes rectification before the outpouring of self-righteous Zionist wrath in Gog and Magog?

    Shalom beShem Yeshua.

  86. Michael Korn March 19, 2010 @ 8:00 am

    Letter to Prof. Justo Gonzalez, author of the book, The Story of Christianity:

    Dear Prof. Gonzalez,

    I have been reading your survey book on Christian history, The Story of Christianity, and I am finding it to be very good reading indeed. I like your style, and also your perspective that Christian history is the unfolding of God’s Holy Spirit operating through fallen men and women.

    You might be interested to know that the word “history” seems to allude to the Hebrew word Nistar (also related to the name Esther), which means hidden. Thus history seems to be God hidden in the unfolding events and affairs of men.

    I was very intrigued to read about the persecutions of Christians during the reign of Marcus Aurelius. The Talmud describes the close friendship between Rabbi Judah the Prince, who redacted the Mishna around 200 CE, and a Roman leader named Antoninus.

    Some scholars think this person was Marcus Aurelius, but even according to the currently favored view that it was Antoninus Pius, he in fact was the adoptive father of Marcus Aurelius, who succeeded him as Roman Emperor.

    I wonder if the friendship between these men might have had something to do with Aurelius’ decision to persecute the Christians? I agree with you that it seems out of character for such a philosophical and sober person as Aurelius to wage such a cruel campaign, so I wonder if his or his father’s affinity for rabbinical Judaism might have prompted him to lash out against the Christians, who were viewed by the leading rabbis as dangerous heretics.

    Have you ever considered this idea?

    I am including some links below for your edification. The Talmud also records that the famous Rabbi Akiva was well known in Rome, extremely rich, and ended up marrying the ex-wife of one of the Roman Emperors. So I do not think it is far fetched to suggest that the rabbis may have instigated in some way the anti-Christian persecutions waged by Rome. (See this link for an explicit assertion to this effect.)

    Thank you for producing this wonderful record of the Holy Spirit operating through history,

    In Christ,
    Shalom beShem Yeshua,
    Michael Korn


    Rabbi Judah the Prince

    Antoninus Pius

    Favour with Hadrian

    Having filled with more than usual success the offices of quaestor and praetor, he obtained the consulship in 120; he was next appointed by the Emperor Hadrian as one of the four proconsuls to administer Italia, then greatly increased his reputation by his conduct as proconsul of Asia.

    He acquired much favor with the Emperor Hadrian, who adopted him as his son and successor on 25 February, 138, after the death of his first adopted son Lucius Aelius, on the condition that Antoninus would in turn adopt Marcus Annius Verus, the son of his wife’s brother, and Lucius, son of Aelius Verus, who afterwards became the emperors Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus (colleague of Marcus Aurelius).

    Scholars place Antoninus Pius as the leading candidate for fulfilling the role as a friend of Rabbi Judah the Prince.

    According to the Talmud (Avodah Zarah 10a-b), Rabbi Judah was very wealthy and greatly revered in Rome. He had a close friendship with “Antoninus”, possibly Antoninus Pius, who would consult Rabbi Judah on various worldly and spiritual matters.

    The Talmud records the long-standing friendship between Judah the Prince and the Roman emperor Antoninus, but whether Marcus Aurelius was Antoninus himself or just a successor is a matter of some debate. Either way, his philosophical writings show that he identified with Jewish values. Rabbi Wein discusses the life and contributions of this rarity of Roman leaders: an altruist who admired and favored the Jewish people.

    Talmudic Account of Friendship Between Rabbi Judah and Antoninus

    Antoninus28 said to Rabbi: ‘The body and the soul can both free themselves from judgment. Thus, the body can plead: The soul has sinned, [the proof being] that from the day it left me I lie like a dumb stone in the grave [powerless to do aught]. Whilst the soul can say: The body has sinned, [the proof being] that from the day I departed from it I fly about in the air like a bird [and commit no sin].’

    He replied, ‘I will tell thee a parable. To what may this be compared? To a human king who owned a beautiful orchard which contained splendid figs. Now, he appointed two watchmen therein, one lame and the other blind. [One day] the lame man said to the blind, “I see beautiful figs in the orchard. Come and take me upon thy shoulder, that we may procure and eat them.”

    So the lame bestrode the blind, procured and ate them. Some time after, the owner of the orchard came and inquired of them, “Where are those beautiful figs?” The lame man replied, “Have I then feet to walk with?” The blind man replied, “Have I then eyes to see with?”

    What did he do? He placed the lame upon the blind and judged them together. So will the Holy One, blessed be He, bring the soul, [re]place it in the body, and judge them together, as it is written, He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people:1 He shall call to the heavens from above-this refers to the soul; and to the earth, that he may judge his people-to the body.’

    Antoninus said to Rabbi, ‘Why does the sun rise in the east and set in the west?’ He replied, ‘Were it reversed, thou wouldst ask the same question.’

    ‘This is my question,’ said he, ‘why set in the west?’2 He answered, ‘In order to salute its Maker, as it is written, And the host of the heavens make obeisance to thee.’3 ‘Then,’ said he to him, ‘it should go only as far as mid-heaven, pay homage, and then re-ascend?’4 — ‘On account of the workers and wayfarers.’5

    Antoninus also said to Rabbi, ‘When is the soul placed in man; as soon as it is decreed [that the sperm shall be male or female, etc.], or when [the embryo] is actually formed?’

    He replied, ‘From the moment of formation.’ He objected: ‘Can a piece of meat be unsalted for three days without becoming putrid?6 But it must be from the moment that [God] decrees [its destiny].’ Rabbi said: This thing Antoninus taught me, and Scripture supports him, for it is written, And thy decree hath preserved my spirit [i.e., my soul].7

    Antoninus also enquired of Rabbi, ‘From what time does the Evil Tempter hold sway over man; from the formation [of the embryo], or from [its] issuing forth [into the light of the world]?! — ‘From the formation,’ he replied.

    ‘If so,’ he objected, ‘it would rebel in its mother’s womb and go forth. But it is from when it issues.’ Rabbi said: This thing Antoninus taught me, and Scripture supports him, for it is said, At the door [i.e.,where the babe emerges] sin lieth in wait.8

    28. Antoninus has been variously identified: with Marcus Aurelius (Rapport); Severus (Graetz, who, however, assumes that it was the second R. Judah the Prince who was the friend of Antoninus); Caracalla (Jast. and N. Krochmal), and others; v. ‘A. Z. 10a, and J. E. I, 656.

    1. Ps. L, 4.

    2. I.e., rising in any quarter, it should return to the same for setting-a question possible, of course, since the earth was assumed to be flat.

    3. Neh. IX. 6. Thus, the sun having reached the west, where the Divine Presence is, sinks down in homage, and therefore does not return to the east to set.

    4. Because it is not etiquette to go right up to one in saluting him.

    5. Were the sun to set suddenly in mid-heaven, i.e., at midday, they would have no sign when to cease work or halt.

    6. Likewise, if the sperm-cell is not immediately endowed with a soul, it would become putrid, and then could not fertilize the ovum.

    7. Job X, 12.

    8. Gen. IV, 7.

    The last portion with the footnotes is from the Talmud:

    Talmudic Account of Friendship Between Rabbi Judah and Antoninus

    Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

    Folio 91a-b

  87. Fr. Joseph March 19, 2010 @ 8:36 am

    Dear Br. Nathanael,

    God’s Own DEEP and Abiding Spiritual Peace and Presence be with you. + Amen.

    Take consolation in my telling you that even after spending LARGE amounts of my own personal hard-earned wage earner’s MONEY in order TO INFORM all of the Executive Officers who run and ‘rule over’ NEW YORK CITY that 9-11-2001 was an ‘Inside Job’, they all continue on like ‘The Big Lie’ they ALL live under (and profit handsomely from) will magically turn into a ‘Truth’ in the Sight of Almighty God!

    The Church’s Canon of Sacred Scripture has GOD INCARNATE HIMSELF speaking these Words of Divine Instruction; take them personally to heart:

    “And if ANYONE does not welcome you or listen to what you have to say, AS YOU WALK OUT of that house or town (or CITY – parens mine) shake the dust from your feet. I tell you solemnly, on the Day of Judgement it will not go as hard with the land of Sodom and Gomorrah as with that town (or CITY). I am sending you out like sheep among WOLVES; so be cunning as serpents and yet harmless as doves.” – Jesus Christ – Matthew 10:13-16

    “It said Soviet nuclear war plans called for aiming two one-megaton bombs at each of the following: the three airports serving NEW YORK CITY, WALL STREET, each major bridge; all major rail centers, all power stations, four NEW YORK CITY area oil refineries, and the NEW YORK CITY PORT FACILITIES (get that all of you NY/NJ Port Authority Officials and your Port Authority POLICE! – parens mine).” – quoting from:

    The entire New York Police Department actually believe themselves to be such ‘TOUGH GUYS’ muscling their brute ‘Police Powers’ on the vowed religious of THE CHURCH!

    What are those NYPD ‘Cross Mocking Cops’ gonna do with they find themselves confronting THIS coming at them in order to engulf THEM, all of their fellow NYPD drinking buddies as well as their own families?

    A proper ‘PENANCE’ for such a public spectacle levied against THE CROSS OF CHRIST and one of THE LORD’S vowed religious servants would be for:

    MAYOR BLOOMBERG and the NEW YORK CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER “beg” for Br. Nathanael’s forgiveness OVER every last NYC T.V. and Radio Station with New York City PAYING for Br. Nathanael to come back to NYC putting him up at a posh NYC hotel and PAYING for Madison Square Garden to be used by Br. Nathanael for a FULL SOLID MONTH in order to speak, preach, teach and inform ALL New York City residents!

    But the LIES, the MOCKING, the spiritual ARROGANCE, the HUBRIS, the IRREVERENCE must goes on and on and on, now mustn’t it?

    Again, may the Divine Father of us all Who sent His Divine Son into our World in order TO SAVE MANKIND from eternal death by His Dying upon THE CROSS to make available His Forgiveness of HUMAN SINS and REBELLION against Him immerse you and ‘drown you’ in His Divine Graces and His Spirit, my dear Br. Nathanael. + Amen.

    – Fr. Joseph

  88. Miranda March 19, 2010 @ 9:07 am

    Yes, the Jews are chasing Brother Nathanael from NYC, out in the open now.

    If you want to read the list of Israelis that our/USA Zionist occupied federal government picked up regarding 9/11 from Wayne Madsen, go to:

  89. Miranda March 19, 2010 @ 9:16 am

    Re: Alex Jones, on Wed:

    His pro-truth 911 architect guest told him that the Israeli military needs to be chased out of the USA.

    Jones quickly defended Jews/Israelis, to no good end.

    Listen to the podcast of the Show, on line.

  90. jgalindes March 19, 2010 @ 11:34 am

    They call this curse a “benediction”.


    BIRKAT HA-MINIM (Heb. בִּרְכַּת הַמִּינִים, “benediction concerning heretics”), the twelfth benediction of the weekday Amidah (the Shmoneh Esreh prayer). The benediction belongs to the latter part of the Amidah petitions, which beseech the redemption of the people of Israel.

    Worded more like an imprecation (see Tanḥuma [Buber ed.], Vayikra 3), in its invocation of divine wrath against internal enemies to Jewish integrity and against external enemies of the Jewish people, it differs from the other petitions.

    Birkat ha-Minim is also distinguished from the other Amidah benedictions by the fact that it was appended after the formulation and fixing of the Amidah text. The tradition of its secondary addition at Jabneh is shared by TJ (Ber. 4:3, 8a) and TB, which attributes its formulation to Samuel ha-Katan at the explicit request of the Nasi, Rabban Gamliel (Ber. 28b).

    Scholarly opinion is divided, however, with regard to the precise understanding of this process. One view holds that the tradition reflected by TB (ibid.) should be accepted literally; accordingly Birkat ha-Minim was formulated at Jabneh and added to the already existing eighteen benedictions (see Fleischer), upping the number to nineteen.

    Accepted in this nineteen-benediction form in the early Babylonian rite, it was subsequently transmitted from this rite to all prayer books up to the present.

    Others contend (see Heinemann) that Rabban Gamliel’s request simply concerned the updating of an already existing benediction among the eighteen – whose content spoke out in general against separatists (see T. Ber. 3:25) – to incorporate explicit mention of the minim.

    This also explains why the versions of the Amidah in the Palestinian rite number only eighteen benedictions, inclusive of Birkat ha-Minim.

    The proponents of this view submit that the nineteen-benediction form of the Amidah in the Babylonian rite reflects a Babylonian custom of splitting the petition for the building of Jerusalem and for the coming of the Davidic messiah into two separate benedictions. In Palestine, both subjects were combined in a single benediction regarding Jerusalem.

    Its exceptional importance in Christian – Jewish relations from the first century C.E. to the present has focused intense scholarly attention on this benediction. The relatively crystallized wording of the benediction in the extant early siddurim (ninth to twelfth centuries) makes it likely that the text preserved there closely resembles its original formulation.

    We find the following wording in a Palestinian siddur from the Cairo Genizah:

    For the apostates let there be no hope. And let the arrogant government be speedily uprooted in our days. Let the noẓerim and the minim be destroyed in a moment. And let them be blotted out of the Book of Life and not be inscribed together with the righteous. Blessed art thou, O Lord, who humblest the arrogant” (Schechter).

    This was also the version commonly used in the Babylonian rite, in which the penultimate sentence, “And let them be blotted out,” was replaced by a petition to cut off all enemies, “may all the enemies of your people and their opponents be speedily cut off.” Other variants reflect a longer, more elaborated request for obliteration of enemies.

    The language of the benediction clearly demonstrates that it was directed, not at non-Jews in general, but rather specifically aimed against external persecutors of the Jews and against Jewish separatists who posed a danger to Judaism’s internal cohesion.

    Nonetheless, as early as the first centuries C.E. we find Church Fathers voicing the claim that the Jews curse the Christians in their prayers. Such contentions, alongside censorship of siddurim, wrought significant changes in the wording of the benediction during the Middle Ages.

    Also contributing to this modificatory process were shifts in the social environment of the Jews and in their worldview.

    Without exception, the word noẓerim was expunged from all Jewish prayer rites, and in many, substitutions were made for minim (heretics) and meshummadim (apostates), as in the accepted opening in the Ashkenazi rite: “may the slanderers (malshinim) have no hope.” Some Reform prayer books omit this benediction entirely.

  91. jgalindes March 19, 2010 @ 11:38 am

    Obviously “minim” and “meshummadim” refers to the followers of Jesus.

    Minim and nozerim (from Nazareth) are mentioned in “The Talmud un-masked” by Fr. Pranaiotis.

    The curse above can be found at:

  92. Brother Nathanael March 19, 2010 @ 11:54 am

    Dear Fr Joseph!

    You are a TRUE friend. I appreciate your deeply felt concern for my plight.

    I am home now licking my wounds and trying to sort out what happened to me in NYC and seeking clarity and Christ’s will for the future of my Street Evangelism.

    For 3 hours in Times Sq the youth were MOBBING me. Taking pictures with me, putting their arms around me, talking about the Lord Jesus Christ – THEN THE COPS CAME AND ENDED IT ALL AND MOCKED THE HOLY CROSS.

    If I am to go to go back to NYC and to other cities with the Holy Cross I must be fully protected both legally and physically. That takes money and organization both of which are lacking in this street effort.

    I will be on the Jeff Rense Program and will be talking about the incident and how the NYC cops are owned by the Jews as well as the ADL infiltration of all police forces with BILLIONS of JEW-BRIBE money.

    Numbers of donations have never been so low. I tried to revive the Street Evangelism “on faith” BUT now I have cancelled the upcoming Boston, Madison WI, and subsequent NYC trip.

    Now, it’s enough for me to just try to pay the high monthly expenses simply to keep OUR site, Real Zionist News, online, (Dedicated Server, anti hacking software; Web Manager; research material: Web Tracking services; mulitiple domain names to prevent pirating) – and to help me maintain living expenses as a monk trying to live outside of a communal monastery.

    Many thank me for my site but are unwilling to help out financially. I appreciate the well wishes but compliments do not pay the bills. Some have promised to help but their promises never materialize.

    Right now I am in discouragement mode. I guess I have been for quite some time. But I keep fighting and I knew that if I stayed another day in NYC I would have returned to the Times Sq median and had been handcuffed UNPREPARED to defend myself with lawyers.

    Perhaps I fled to come back and fight another day. But that will take money which is not there to protect against OFFICIAL WICKEDNESS of badges, guns, official papers, and seals, and lies MADE OFFICIAL. I HAVE been through it before in defenseless situations and will NOT put myself at the mercy of lying cops again.

    The CHRIST HATING – FREEDOM HATING JEWS have BILLIONS of dollars at their disposal. I have to beg everytime I put up a new RZN article. I am really tired of begging and getting back diminishing returns. At this point, because the legal fees for the LA incident are beyond my means, I may have to drop that case as well…

    This weeks’ two articles got close to 20,000 hits. How many donated online? Two people. Is that 1/200th of 1 %?

    AND why should I continue the LA law suit? My appeal for financial legal help produced little results (ONLY A FEW HELP OUT OF TENS OF THOUSAND OF READERS) and I am not going to travel to other cities again including LA – UNLESS I can “professionalize” the Street evangelism with money and organizational infrastructure.

    To go out on my own and subject myself to jack-booted/military-enabled cops is not what I want to experience ANY LONGER. They Despise the Constitution and have become mini Hitlers.

    Much Love In Christ Our God and Saviour, +Brother Nathanael

  93. R. C. Christian March 19, 2010 @ 1:00 pm


    Here is the interview you are referring to.

    Starting at 198:00 on the timeline Ron Avery says that the US has been infiltrated by a foreign military/government. Alex continually interrupts and does his best to blame 911 on Americans. Alex is a Zionist.

    If Bro Nate can update my email acct for receiving RZN alerts to the new email address in my profile it would be much appreciated.

    Joohoo has terminated my previous email acct.

  94. Michael Korn March 19, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

    Regarding the Hebrew term Min, it is not actually a word but an acronym for:

    Ma’aminay Yeshua Notzri: Believers in Jesus the Nazarene.

    (There is another term Min which is a word, meaning sex or gender, but this is not the intention in the “blessing” discussed above.)

    See this very good post by Roy Tov (Good Shepherd) about the true meaning of the Hebrew term Notzri (Nazarene) referring to Christians. Roy Tov suggests it does not derive from Nazareth, which would read Nazarathene in Hebrew — Natzrati, but rather from Notzer, or guardian, and thus has the connotation of one who guards the true faith:

    See also this for a related piece:

    This suggests more than a little schizophrenia in ancient Jewish sources about the veracity of Jesus of Nazareth and Christianity!

    Let us pray for their healing from mental illness (which is a spiritual curse enumerated by Moses in Deuteronomy 28:28) and their joining themselves to their own “Messiah” and “Savior of the World,” which will be the very life from the dead according to St. Paul in Romans 11:

    Deuteronomy 28:28

    28 The LORD will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind.

    Romans 11:11-15

    Ingrafted Branches

    11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.

    12 But if their transgression means riches for the world, and their loss means riches for the Gentiles, how much greater riches will their fullness bring!

    13 I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I make much of my ministry

    14 in the hope that I may somehow arouse my own people to envy and save some of them.

    15 For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?

  95. Brother Nathanael March 19, 2010 @ 1:40 pm

    Dear Miranda and RC Christian –

    Can you YouTube the excerpts of Jones defending Jews and I will get it all over the Internet.

    OR – if anyone else can do it that would be great.

    Send me the link if able and post it here also.

  96. USSA=RAN BY NWO March 19, 2010 @ 1:45 pm

    Bro. Nathanael,

    I’m sorry to hear of your plight, and the blasphemous desecration of the Cross of Calvary by the domestic storm-troopers.

    I pray that Christ will comfort you, bring justice to those who don’t respect His blessed atonement for mankind, and give you further discernment for your future endeavors.

    @Hoff – Your comments are great.

    The Christian-Zionists are the Christian Amerikan masses own enemy and they don’t even realize it. I’ve tried, and tried to talk to people about the persecution of Christians in Israel, etc. and many often offer vile rhetoric about their choseness, how God’s judging America for not fully standing behind Israel, call me a “self-hater” (I have trace Sephardi ancestry), tell me i’d better be careful in talking about the Zionists, etc.

    SOMEONE needs to expose these televangelist dispensationalist like Hal Lindsey, Jack Van Impe, John Hagee, and Perry Stone for promoting a foreign Nations interests over their own peoples. These guys have big audiences and convince their viewers to support an agenda that is against their own interests.

    No wonder truth can’t get off of the ground-televangelist superstars and 501C3 Federalized Churches won’t even tell people the whole deal.

    No wonder there are so many ignorant people nowadays-theyv’e been misled by their own schools, Churches, government, and “Free” Press. All the hype and jive out here are no coincidence.

    May the truth prevail.

  97. R. C. Christian March 19, 2010 @ 2:07 pm

    Bro Nate,

    Here is the link to the AJ/Ron Avery videos, it should be noted that Alex constantly refers to 911 being an “inside job” rather than my buzz-word term “911 was a Jew Job!”

    Ron makes clear his stance on the “inside job” misdirection. His statements regarding foreign military assets working within the United States is at the 6:30 mark.

  98. charlie March 19, 2010 @ 2:43 pm


  99. katman March 19, 2010 @ 5:16 pm

    The voice of a murdered man speaks to us from the grave. Shall we listen?

    People of America, the wars that your government promotes in the world – one of them being the war in Iraq – with input from certain centers of power – which you know better than we – are not in the interests of the American people.

    You know better than many how you paid in blood so that you might liberate yourselves from British colonialism and after that how the United States of America was unified and what rivers of blood were shed in order for that to come about.

    So, esteemed ladies and gentlemen, how do you accept this interference that abases America before it abases Iraq? How can you accept not only the invasion but becoming mired in the internal affairs of Iraq?

    You know that Iraq is a land of prophets, messengers, and righteous figures. You know that Baghdad is the fourth holiest city in the Arab homeland – after Mecca, al-Madinah, and Jerusalem – in the sight of all of the Islamic world and all of our Arab Nation.

    How can one imagine that Iraq could reconcile itself to colonial rule, even if it comes, this time, under another name and with other slogans? Save your country, esteemed ladies and gentlemen, and leave Iraq.


    God is greatest. God is greatest.


    Saddam Hussein,
    President of the Republic of Iraq and Commander in Chief of the Mujahid Armed Forces.

    7 July 2006.

  100. katman March 19, 2010 @ 6:20 pm

    A Rothschild plan for Serbia.

    When Yugoslavia broke up around 1991, the Serbs went about some internal housekeeping.

    A civil war started. Here we had a indigenous ethnically white slavic group, who acted in concert to uphold their nationalistic beliefs. These people were and are still, held together by their traditions, their history and above all else their religion. This was the glue that held them together.

    Needless to say, this caused the Jews some problems. I mean afterall, they wanted the raw materials that the region contained and with these white Serbs running around acting like they run something, well, this was not good for business.

    So enter Bill Clinton and the US Airforce stage left and this little upstart nation was bombed back into the stoneage.

    On the way to their goal the Rothschilds bring into play reforms, transitions, shock therapies, elections, referendums, secessions, revolutions, civil wars, military interventions…

    Nations are offered “freedom”, “democracy” and voluntary enslavement in return for their independence and resources!

    The alternative is sanctions, isolation and bombing!

    Former Yugoslavia was a phase in the crusade of Rothschild empire towards the east. The geopolitical combinations were not a Serbian ally yet again.

    Unfortunately, Serbia stood in the way of this beast with a kind face. On the way to their goal the Rothschilds bring into play reforms, transitions, shock therapies, elections, referendums, secessions, revolutions, civil wars, military interventions…

  101. Fr. Joseph March 20, 2010 @ 6:57 am

    Dear Br. Nathanael,

    My own Bishop relayed a Message TO ME some years back regarding my own personal efforts. The LORD simply told me in that particular letter-Message from my Bishop the words…

    “…some will respond, many will not.”

    Anyways, go spend some very much needed ‘R&R’ in Blessed Silence and Blessed Stillness. Forget these ‘people’ you’ve had to contend with in our contemporary World – and simply turn ALL of your mind, heart, soul and spirit’s energies ONTO a focused attention towards and attentiveness TO the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

    Just to cheer you up, I’m putting together a little ‘Johnson & Johnson’ FIRST AID KIT so to put some first aid cream and bandages on your ‘bruises’ – to be sure, they ARE goint to heal.

    Off to the mails in order to get it mailed to you when I sign off the computer.

    Lastly, in the future, why not simply get a local Orthodox parish in ANY/ALL of the cities all across the U.S.A. to ‘sponsor’ you on their properties, etc.?

    Might as well ‘speed up’ the day when the Ghengis Khan Talmudic Khazars comes after the current ‘Official’ institutional Catholic and Orthodox Church doing to them what the military-police-banking-legal powers of ‘The Almighty States’ have done to you in New York City.

    It’s inevitable.

    – Fr. Joseph

  102. jgalindes March 20, 2010 @ 7:16 am

    A report from Civilta Cattolica,1881:

    On the permission to kill Christians by observant Jews and the willingness of the Catholic Church to influence a change for the betterment of the “Chosen people”.

    Showing that, for the good or the bad, the Church did not keep an extermination policy, hatred or avenge.

    Also mentions, in passing, the Birkat Ha Minim curse.

  103. jgalindes March 20, 2010 @ 7:44 am

    A disgusting report from The Church (Civilta Cattolica,1881) on the Blood Libel.

    I’am sick and tired of the “wicked tribe.”

  104. Fr. Joseph March 20, 2010 @ 10:42 am

    Dear Br. Nathanael,

    Spent a couple of hours very near to THE LORD in the Blessed Sacrament here at my home-hermitage.

    Aside from the prayerful-contemplative insights of and into the unseen spiritual Divine Aspects of the Spiritual Relationship between The Creator and His creatures, this was an Idea given to me to offer TO YOU.

    In the spiritual interest and desire to bring God’s Blessings and Eternal Salvation to the many hundreds of thousands of CHILDREN and YOUNG ADOLESCENTS there economically, politically, morally and spiritually imprisoned and enslaved in the five boroughs of NEW YORK CITY:

    As you allow God the Holy Spirit’s Graces, Gifts and Consolations to HEAL YOU from the personal injuries – seen and unseen – suffered on your last trek into NEW YORK CITY – consider the following ‘Plan Of Attack’…

    Research the names of 100 churches/parishes in the FIVE BOROUGHS of New York City, obtaining 20 of the larger churches/parishes from EACH of the 5 New York City Boroughs. You can readily use the on-line ‘Yellow Pages’ to do that.

    Then, on a SINGLE sheet of paper compose a letter to THE BISHOP/PASTOR of those 100 NYC churches/parishes requesting their permission and assistance in allowing YOU to do a wee bit of NEW YORK CITY ‘STREET EVANGELISM’ from their property/properties.

    On a SECOND, THIRD and FOURTH sheet of paper, pick out the BEST ‘Real Zionist News’ feature stories-articles YOU like, print out the ‘Headline’ sheet, and assemble these FOUR SHEETS into a number 10 letter mailing envelope.

    Place 100 1st Class USPS stamps on these 100 letters with your personal letter and four attending Real Zionist News headline story sheets.


    MAKE DARN SURE that you send a CERTIFIED LETTER contanining your letter and FOUR Real Zionist News headline sheets to

    1) The Mayor of New York City;
    2) The FIVE New York City Borough Presidents; and

    Wait about two weeks for the RESPONSE from these 100 churches-parishes.

    After TWO WEEKS, you can then list the churches, the parishes, to whom you mailed those 100 letters, and you can PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE each and every last one the churches-parishes RESPONSE you received from them HERE for the ENTIRE WHOLE WIDE WORLD to read, to see, to view for themselves.

    To be sure – you make DARN SURE that you bring up this Idea up with THE LORD in deep personal contemplative prayer, asking St. Michael the Archangel for his and his legions of Warrior Angels’ ASSISTANCE in ‘Fine Tuning’ this Idea, okay?

    – Fr. Joseph

  105. Michael Korn March 20, 2010 @ 10:52 am

    Some important qualifiers to bear in mind.

    If you read this book by Victoria Clark, you will see that Zionism was very much supported by Protestant Evangelical groups in the UK and the US, dating back to the time of Queen Victoria and evern earlier.

    In some respects these groups were more aggressve even than the Jews they were courting: “Allies for Armageddon: The Rise of Christian Zionism” by Victoria Clark.

    So in some ways we might view Zionism as a movement aided, abbetted and encouraged by Christian elites in the West.

    They did so for a complex mix of idealogical and practical reasons, including Empire building.

    It is shallow to now blame Israel alone for the impasse in the region and for the suffering of the native Palestinians.

    The original UN partition vote spelled the death knell for the Palestinians. The Western powers were too cowardly to exterminate the Palestinians themselves, so they partitioned a tiny country that could ill afford to be divided and handed it over to the Zionist International.

    The Palestinians had no political organization and were totally unprepared to create their own state in what had been a foreign protectorate for centuries. It was like throwoing a bloody piece of flesh into shark infested waters and then telling the person standing on shore that he was free to dive in and fetch it for himself!

    As for Biden, he doesn’t care a whit for the Palestinians, or for anyone who is not a member of the financial elite, poor Americans included.

    Biden’s row with Netanyahu over the housing units to be built in East Jerusalem for rich Jews is like a dispute between the rich in the Catskills or the Hamptons over some kind of zoning provision. In the end it is a load of meaningless BS.

    See this clip of Biden ducking a 9-11 truth questioner. Biden is a servant of the elites and the banking industry. He is no friend of the simple, the humble, and the poor:

  106. Michael Korn March 20, 2010 @ 11:13 am

    One final point on this.

    As I have written before, the Catholic church bears perhaps the greatest responsibility for empowering the Zionists by granting the Jews monopoly usurious banking rights.

    The RCC made two deadly errors here:

    (1) giving the Jews the sole banking powers; and

    (2) permitting Christians to borrow from Jews or indeed from anyone.

    The Old Testament clearly prohibits lending and borrowing on interest.

    When I lived in Israel, the Jews there laughed at how the Christian church itself helped to create Jewry’s incredible international financial power.

    To my knowledge the Russians never made this accomodation to Jewish finance, and that is one reason why they were targeted for Bolshevik takeover.

  107. jgalindes March 20, 2010 @ 11:25 am

    Does the ritual murder in February 1840 of Capuchin Fr.Thomas Al-Capuci in Damascus, and the intervention of SUPER-RICH JEW Sir Moses Montefiore on behalf of the assassins, and HIS EFFORTS WITH THE POWERS IN EUROPE TO FORCE THE MUSLIM RULER AT THE TIME TO SPLIT THE SYRIAN TERRITORY IN ORDER TO CREATE ISRAEL MEAN SOMETHING TO YOU?

  108. Fr. Joseph March 20, 2010 @ 11:34 am

    Dear Michael Korn,

    Concur about the GHASTLY MISTAKE by the nominally Christian European Nobility of centuries past allowing these Khazarian Talmudists BANKING FAMILIES employing and utilizing ‘The Zohar’ of the Kabbalah to gain influence OVER these nominals of Christian Europe’s past.

    But do NOT discount the many occult brotherhoods and secret societies that work and work ‘in the shadows’ within and amongst Chrisitan Society and Christian Civilization!

    And in the Final Analysis, what did or does ANY of these anti-Christ types accomplish for THEMSELVES? They died. They were buried.

    They are no longer with us. And in their REJECTION of the Divine Revelation of the Only Eternally Begotten Son of God – JESUS CHRIST – the Word through Whom ALL things came into existance for FOR Whom ALL things exist – they were subjected to FINAL DIVINE JUDGEMENT.

    There is no such thing as a ‘Secret Society’ or Masonic, Rosicrucian, Hermetic Order or Kabbalahist ‘Get Out Of HELL Free’ Card in Almighty God’s “Monopoly Game Box”!

    – Fr. Joseph

  109. Fr. Joseph March 20, 2010 @ 11:39 am

    Br. Nathanael,

    If the Holy Spirit CONFIRMS that Idea of mine to you regarding soliciting 100 churches-parishes in five Boroughs of New York City, then give me a ‘Thumbs Up!’ or a ‘Thumbs Down’ here on RZN.

    If ‘All Divine Systems Are A “Go!”!’, then I’ll mail you $100.00 of these virtually USELESS Federal Reserve Notes which passes itself off a ‘U.S. Currency’.

    If the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Rockerfellers and the Private Owners of the BANK OF ENGLAND holed up in London, UK can fund ‘Wars Without End’ all over the Peoples and their Nations all over our GOD-GIVEN Created Seen All with their ‘Fiat Currencies’ – then I can most assuredly help ‘FINANCE’ a Divine War to some extent!

    “The Pen That Rules The World”

    “An Example of Banking Philosophy”

    – Fr. Joseph

  110. katman March 20, 2010 @ 12:40 pm

    In my honest opinion, there good Friar, the churches will not touch Brother Nate with a ten foot pole. He is untouchable and they will ignore him.

    For example in John Chapter 7 we find:

    1. After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.

    2. Now the Jew’s feast of tabernacles was at hand.

    3. His brethren therefore said unto him, Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that thy disciples also may see the works that thou doest. 4. For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.

    5. For neither did his brethren believe in him.

    6. Then Jesus said unto them, My time is not yet come: but your time is alway ready.

    7. The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.

    8. Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up yet unto this feast: for my time is not yet full come.

    9. When he had said these words unto them, he abode still in Galilee.

    10. But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret.

    11. Then the Jews sought him at the feast, and said, Where is he?

    12. And there was much murmuring among the people concerning him: for some said, He is a good man: others said, Nay; but he deceiveth the people.

    13. Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews.

    So as it was over 2000 years ago, it is today. For no church will help Brother Nathanel today, for fear of the Jews. I hope I am wrong but I fear I am not.

    Brother Nathaneal’s subject matter will make the ears of the members of these churches to itch and his plight and his message will make them feel uncomfortable and make them have to see things that they simply do not want to see.

  111. katman March 20, 2010 @ 12:47 pm

    The following situation happened in a VA Hospital. I go to the VA hospital for my medical care.

    It is not too bad around here. But I fear such situations as the below incidence will, as time goes by, become the norm.

    Already they bug me about shots etc. If the time ever comes when they become too much to bear, then my time in their “care” will be over.

    I know that time is coming soon. I just feel it. I watch the men in those places and many of them are just slaves and do what they are told.

    I play the game for now. But soon, perhaps, I will not. My line is drawn in the sand.

    The government would have to disarm the military, the cops (most are vets) and us.

    VA Questions Regarding Concealed Carry Permit

    I Got this from a very reliable retired cop. For what it is worth:

    Veteran’s Administration Questions Regarding Concealed Carry Permit

    I received this today from a friend of mine. You may find it interesting and may wish to pass it along.

    I had a doctor’s appointment at the local VA clinic yesterday and found something very interesting I would like to pass along. While going through triage before seeing the doctor, I was asked at the end of the exam, three questions.

    (1. Did I feel stressed?
    (2. Did I feel threatened?
    (3. Did I feel like doing harm to someone?

    The nurse then informed me, if I had answered yes to any of the questions, I would have lost my concealed carry permit as it would have gone into my medical records and the VA would have reported it to Homeland Security.

    I am a Vietnam vet and 15 year cc permit holder. Looks like they are going after us vets. Be forewarned and be aware.

    The Obama administration has gone on record as considering veterans and gun owners as potential terrorists. If you are a veteran, you’ve been warned. If you know veterans, please pass this on to them.

  112. Brother Nathanael March 20, 2010 @ 1:25 pm

    Dear Fr Joseph –

    I think the best way to tackle this dilemma of Street Evangelism is to “wait on the Lord” and see what HIS WILL is in this matter.

    I sense that a “Brother Nathanael Foundation” with a Board of Directors (you will certainly be on it if you are willing) and a law firm “on retainer.”

    Then a resource center that will have VIDEO/AUDIO capacities to present TRUE TESTIMONY to what is happening on the Street during my median strip Evangelism to COUNTER Police lies of “disorderly conduct.”

    Young people coming up to hug me is NOT “disorderly conduct!”

    Just the opposite. NO judge UNLESS the judge has been bribed or biased against the Holy Cross (lots of Jew judges these days) would ever rule otherwise.

    I NOW ASK ALL Real Zionist News Readers to consider helping me out financially. It is hard enough just to make RZN expenses each month and my quest to make a living out of these articles.

    There is a Donation Feature Button at the Top of this Article. Or simply Click:

    Donations May Also Be Safely Sent To:

    Brother Nathanael Kapner: PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    Last week’s two articles fetched over 25,000 hits. But only 2 people donated online and 2 by snail mail. I cannot hope to expand my ministry with these low numbers of donations let alone make expenses and help me to remain a monk living outside of a monastery.

    With Much Love In Christ Our God and Saviour,

    +Brother Nathanael

  113. The Prodigal Son March 20, 2010 @ 2:28 pm

    Michael Korn,

    Do you actually believe that the Roman church forced Christians to borrow money from the ‘Jews’ (Pharisees)?

    Or were the ‘Jews’ already influencing one man (the pope) to do whatever they wanted him to? Who has ALL of the Vatican’s money?

    And yes the Mosaic law of the O.T. prohibits usury… but Christians are not subject to the Old Covenant Mosaic law.

    And the so-called ‘Jews’ (Pharisees) don’t follow the Mosaic law – and haven’t since before Christ’s time on earth. The ‘Jews’ adhere instead to the ‘traditions of the elders’ (now codified in the Talmud) which make the commandments of God of no effect.

    And the Talmud ‘clarifies’ (anulls) the law against usury by saying that usury is only forbidden to be practiced on another ‘Jew’… Usury on the un-circumcised nations (‘Gentiles’) however IS allowed.

    — — —


    The English word ‘Jew(s)’ is a made-up word.

    In English Bibles – in the Old Testament the word ‘Jew’ is used in place of what should be ‘Judahite(s)’. For all of the other tribes of Israel – it’s the same pattern…

    The entire tribe of Israel were called ‘Israelites’… The tribe of Levi were known as ‘Levites’; the tribe of Gad were known as ‘Gadites’; the tribe of Asher – ‘Asherites’; the tribe of Reuben – ‘Reubenites’, etc, etc.

    But when it comes to the tribe of Judah – instead of ‘Judahites’… we see the NEW, made-up English word ‘Jews’. I believe this is no accident.

    Then when we read the New Testament we see residents of Galilee called ‘Galileans’… But residents of Judea – who SHOULD have been known as ‘Judeans’ – are instead called by the made-up word ‘Jews’.

    Thus – English Bibles draw a false parallel between Judahites and Judeans.

    The word ‘Jew’ – representing what should have been Judahite AND what should have been Judean – therefore makes Christians believe that these two words and groups were synonymous with each other!

    The words ‘Judahite(s)’ and ‘Judean(s)’ are not found ANYWHERE in English Bibles!

    But were all of the Judeans also Judahites? *NO!* In fact – many (if not most) of the residents and leadership (including Herod) of the Roman province of Judea (Judeans) in Christ’s day were actually EDOMITES!

    They thought Christ was going to be the temporal king of the Israelites… What would have happened to the Edomite power structure if an Israelite king came to power?

    This is why Herod tried to kill the Christ Child when He was born – ordering the deaths of all male children under the age of two in Galilee.

    The verse you provided therefore – I believe SHOULD read as follows:

    “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Judea, because the Judeans sought to kill him.”

    Jesus was a Judahite… an Israelite – and the Israelites who were in Judea for the feast welcomed Him crying, “Hosannah!”

    But the Edomite Judeans (‘Jews’) DID NOT welcome Him… and they sought to kill Him.

  114. R. C. Christian March 20, 2010 @ 2:50 pm

    The Jewdicial system will eat you alive.

    With Jew judges named after their place of origin, it’s best to just steer clear of confrontation until you have a back-up to record (video) every moment of your street work.

    An example of how deep we are in Zionist excrement:

    Judge rejects 9/11 worker payouts

    A judge has rejected a $657m (£437m) deal to compensate workers who suffered ill-health after helping out at New York’s Ground Zero after the 9/11 attacks, ruling the sum is not adequate.

    Federal judge Alvin HELLerstein said the proposed payout was not a fair deal for about 10,000 police officers, firefighters and labourers made sick by the dust and debris.

    Under the settlement, the amount received by each responder is based on a complicated points system that would give some workers only a few thousand dollars while others might qualify for $1m or more.

    The judge said he was concerned too much of the money would be eaten up by legal fees and that the plaintiffs were being pressured into signing up to the agreement before they knew how much they stood to receive.

    A third or more of the cash was expected to go to lawyers.

    Workers have been given just 90 days to decide whether they agree to the terms, far too short a time for such an important decision, said Hellerstein.

    “I will not preside over a settlement that is based on fear or ignorance,” he said.

    Hellerstein, who rules over all federal court litigation related to the terror attacks, had heard from several tearful responders speaking about their illnesses, and received letters and phone calls from others expressing confusion about the deal.

    The settlement has taken years to negotiate and was announced last week. Hellerstein said more negotiations were now needed.

    The payouts will come from a fund set up after the attacks when New York City was unable to find private insurance to cover claims originating from the clean-up effort.

  115. R. C. Christian March 20, 2010 @ 2:54 pm

    The Final Solution?

    If all people convert to Judaism all nations can tell the Jewish bankers to take their usury and debt slavery and go back to Hell!

  116. Amy March 20, 2010 @ 4:38 pm

    Christians Discriminated Against by Israel

    ‘Christians in the Holy Land’ Booklet

    By Donald Neff

    Former Israel Bureau Chief for Time Magazine

    Excerpted from Fifty Years of Israel

    On Dec. 29, 1977, Christians in Israel and the occupied territories protested a new law passed by the Israeli parliament making it illegal for missionaries to proselytize Jews. Protestant churches charged that the law had been “hastily pushed through parliament during the Christmas period when Christians were busily engaged in preparing for and celebrating their major festival.”

    The law made missionaries liable to five years’ imprisonment for attempting to persuade people to change their religion, and three years’ imprisonment for any Jew who converted. The United Christian Council complained that the law could be “misused in restricting religious freedom in Israel.”

    Donald Neff has been a journalist for forty years. He spent 16 years in service for Time Magazine and is a regular contributor to Middle East International and the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. He is the author of five excellent books on the Middle East.

    Nonetheless, it came into force on April 1, 1978, prohibiting the offering of “material inducement” for a person to change his religion. A material inducement could be something as minor as the giving of a Bible.

    Although the Likud government of Menachem Begin assured the Christian community that the law applied equally to all religions and did not specifically mention Christians, the United Christian Council of Israel charged that it was biased and aimed specifically at Christians since only Christians openly proselytized.

    Council representatives also cited anti-Christian speeches made in the parliament during debate on the law. Parliament member Binyamin Halevy had called missionaries “a cancer in the body of the nation.”

    The next year Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef, considered a political moderate, issued a religious ruling that copies of the New Testament should be torn out of any edition of a Bible owned by a Jew.

    Israeli scholar Yehoshafat Harkabi wrote that he was disturbed by “these manifestations of hostility – the designation of Christians as idolaters, the demand to invoke the ‘resident alien’ ordinances, and the burning of the New Testament.” Observed Harkabi: “Outside of the Land of Israel Jews never dared behave in this fashion. Has independence made the Jews take leave of their senses?”

    Desecration of Christian property and churches—arson, window breaking, burning of the New Testament—had long marred relations between the two communities. A small but fanatical group of Jews wanted no Christians, whom they considered fallen Jews, in Israel. This virulent strain of prejudice had been present since before the Jewish state was founded.

    For instance, after the capture by Jewish forces of Jaffa on May 13, 1948, two days before Israel’s birth, there was desecration of Christian churches. Father Deleque, a Catholic priest, reported:

    “Jewish soldiers broke down the doors of my church and robbed many precious and sacred objects. Then they threw the statues of Christ down into a nearby garden.” He added that Jewish leaders had reassured that religious buildings would be respected, “but their deeds do not correspond to their words.”

    On May 31, 1948, a group of Christian leaders comprising the Christian Union of Palestine publicly complained that Jewish forces had used 10 Christian churches and humanitarian institutions in Jerusalem as military bases and otherwise desecrated them.

    They added that a total of 14 churches had suffered shell damage, which killed three priests and made casualties of more than 100 women and children.

    The group’s statement said Arab forces had abided by their promise to respect Christian institutions, but that the Jews had forcefully occupied Christian structures and been indiscriminate in shelling churches.

    It said, among other charges, that “many children were killed or wounded” by Jewish shells on the Convent of Orthodox Copts on May 19, 23 and 24; that eight refugees were killed and about 120 wounded at the Orthodox Armenian Convent at some unstated date; and that Father Pierre Somi, secretary to the Bishop, had been killed and two wounded at the Orthodox Syrian Church of St. Mark on May 16.

    Churches were again desecrated during the 1967 war when Israel captured East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, completing the occupation of all of Palestine. On July 21, 1967, the Reverend James L. Kelso, a former moderator of the United Presbyterian Church and long-time resident in Palestine, complained of extensive damage to churches adding:

    “So significant was this third Jewish war against the Arabs that one of the finest missionaries of the Near East called it ‘perhaps the most serious setback that Christendom has had since the fall of Constantinople in 1453.’”

    Kelso continued: “How did Israel respect church property in the fighting…? They shot up the Episcopal Cathedral [in Jerusalem], just as they had done in 1948. They smashed down the Episcopal school for boys…The Israelis wrecked and looted the YMCA…They wrecked the big Lutheran hospital…The Lutheran center for cripples also suffered…”

    Nancy Nolan, wife of a physician at the American University Hospital in Beirut, who was in Jerusalem during and after the fighting, charged that “while the Israeli authorities proclaim to the world that all religions will be respected and protected, and post notices identifying the Holy Places, Israeli soldiers and youths are throwing stink bombs in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.

    “The Church of St. Anne, whose crypt marks the birthplace of the Virgin Mary, has been severely damaged and the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem also was damaged.

    “The wanton killing of the Warden of the Garden Tomb followed by the shooting into the tomb itself, in an attempt to kill the warden’s wife, was another instance that we knew first-hand which illustrated the utter disregard shown by the occupation forces toward the Holy Places and the religious sensibilities of the people in Jordan and in the rest of the world.”

    “The desecration of churches…includes smoking in the churches, littering the churches, taking dogs inside and entering in inappropriate manner of dress. Behavior such as this cannot be construed other than as a direct insult to the whole Christian world.”

    Desecration has occurred not only in times of war. As recently as 1995, an Israeli soldier, Daniel Koren, 22, entered St. Anthony Catholic Church in Jaffa and went on a shooting rampage, firing more than 100 bullets in the altar and the cross above it but causing no injuries.

    Koren said his Judaic convictions forced him to destroy all physical images of God, and admitted that he had staged a prior attack in Jerusalem’s Gethsemane Church.

    Perhaps the worst outbreak of organized desecration of Christian institutions came on Sept. 10, 1963, when hundreds of ultra-orthodox Jews simultaneously attacked Christian missions in Jaffa, Haifa and Jerusalem. (One has to say “perhaps because reporting on this sensitive subject in the U.S. media has been so poor over the decades.)

    At any rate, the attacks were a concerted effort to intimidate Christians in Israel by a religious vigilante group called Hever Peelei Hamahane Hatorati, the Society of Activists of the Torah Camp. In an attack on the Church of Scotland school in Jaffa, Christian children were beaten and considerable damage was caused to the school by at least 200 rampaging Jews.

    Other attacks occurred at two nearby church schools, the Greek Catholic missionary school of St. Joseph and a Christian Brothers school. In Jerusalem, attacks occurred at the St. Joseph convent and the Finnish Lutheran mission school. In Haifa, the American-European Beth El Messianic Mission Children’s Hostel and School was attacked.

    No serious damage occurred in any of the attacks except at the Scotland school. More than 100 Jews were convicted in the attacks, none of them receiving more than small fines and suspended sentences.

    The first half of the 1980s, with Likud governments in control, was a particularly active period for Jewish bigots. On Oct. 8, 1982, the Baptist Church in Jerusalem was burned down. Kerosene had been sprinkled on the church’s wooden chapel, constructed in 1933.

    Although no one was ever charged in the arson, the Baptist Center’s bookstore had been vandalized a dozen times in previous years, and Jews were suspected. When the Baptists sought to rebuild the church, Jews demonstrated against the project and the Jewish district planning commission refused to grant a building permit.

    In 1985, the Israeli Supreme Court advised the Baptists to leave the all-Jewish area.

    On Christmas Day in 1983, a hotel in Tiberias where Christians held meetings was set afire, the latest in a series of attacks on a small group of about 50 Christians. Two Jews were arrested in the arson incident.

    Other attacks included stones thrown through windows at the hotel while the group was meeting and break-ins at the homes of members of the group. The anti-missionary group Yad Le’Achim complained that Christian missionaries were offering money, clothes, jewelry and tennis shoes to listen to Christian lectures.

    Just over a fortnight later, on Jan. 11, 1984, suspected Jewish extremists stacked hymnals on a piano in a Christian prayer room in Jerusalem and set them afire. Also in the same week angry Jews protesting Christian proselytizing caused Beth Shalom, a Christian evangelical group, to withdraw its plans to build a multimillion-dollar hotel in Jerusalem.

    Beth Shalom took its action after about 150 Jews showed up at a city council meeting with placards reading “You can’t buy me” and “I didn’t immigrate to live next door to missionaries.” A leader of the protest, Rabbi Moshe Berlinger, compared Christian missionaries to Trojan horses.

    Jewish infringements on Christian rights became so bad by 1990 that on Dec. 20 the leaders of Christian churches in Jerusalem took the extraordinary decision to restrict Christmas celebrations to protest “the continuing sad state of affairs in our land,” including encroachment by Israel on traditional Christian institutions.

    Among concerns expressed by the patriarchs and heads of churches were attempts by Jewish settlers to move into the Old City and an “erosion of the traditional rights and centuries-old privileges of the churches,” including imposition by Israel of municipal and state taxes on the churches.

    The statement added: “We express our deep concern over new problems confronting the local church. They interfere with the proper functioning of our religious institutions, and we call upon the civil authorities in the country to safeguard our historic rights and status honored by all governments.”

    Anti-Christian prejudice helps account for the fact that the number of Christian Palestinians in all of former Palestine had dwindled to only 50,000 in 1995. They no longer were a major presence in either Jerusalem or Ramallah, and they were fast losing their majority status in Bethlehem.

    When Israel was established in 1948, the Palestinian Christian community had numbered 200,000, compared to roughly 600,000 Jews in Palestine at the time.

    Now the Christians are not even one percent of the population of Israel/Palestine. Of today’s estimated total 400,000 Christian Palestinians, most now are living in their own diaspora, mainly in the Americas.

  117. charlie March 20, 2010 @ 4:50 pm

    Palestinian Children.

    This song is 30 years old….. nothing’s changed.

  118. Marshall March 20, 2010 @ 7:05 pm

    Here’s Joe Biden kissin’ up to Zionism.

    Really strange the way he’s hugging that microphone :-O

  119. Hoff March 20, 2010 @ 7:14 pm

    There is no Jewish conspiracy. Trust me!

  120. someone March 21, 2010 @ 3:14 am

    Dear Brother Nathaneal,

    Here is a pointer for you.

    Look at these sequence of events:

    1. Assassination in Dubai of a top leader.
    2. Joe’s visit to Israel.
    3. Broken glass !

    Is event #1 linked to this story?

    Go figure !

    Keep up your good work.

  121. Aussie thinker March 21, 2010 @ 3:38 pm

    Middle East peace can only be a pipedream, Jews do not make good neighbours.

    We had a nice house in the southern suburbs of Melbourne. A Jewish family bought the house next door to us. I could not work out how the family was supported as the male of the house did not work, neither did his wife.

    One day I was mowing our front lawn, the Jew strolls over and asks if I would mow his lawn, “it won’t take you long.” I wanted to be friendly, helpful and neighbourly, so I mowed his front lawn.

    I did not think that he would expect me to mow his damned lawn every week, but he did.

    I became sick one night and was taken to hospital, I needed urgent surgery. It took me a couple of months to recover.

    I heard a knock on the front door one morning, it was the Jew from next door. He complained that his lawn was overgrown, I told him that I was not strong enough to mow his damned lawn. “This is not good” he says, I thought maybe he had a bit of compassion for me. “Who will mow my front lawn now?”

    Then he asked me if we were interested in selling our house to him, I told him no, our kids were settled at the nearby school. Then he took to throwing stones on our roof, we rang the police, he denied throwing stones, we contacted the local council, they weren’t interested.

    We contacted a legal firm, who took our case to court, we won damages against him. He then declared himself bankrupt and unable to pay, all his assets were held in his wife’s name. The stones continued, eventually we decided to sell the house.

    The Jew was enraptured, he wanted to build a synagogue on our combined properties, he already had planning permits. We refused all his offers to buy our house.

    We eventually sold the house to a nice Greek family who had no time for Jews and no intention of selling their house to the Jew. Today our house still stands, and knowing Greeks as I do, they would not put up with any Jews’ nonsense.

  122. Collaterally Pursued March 21, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

    @ Nicolae

    Great info. I’ve added some comments to statements I found very compelling:

    “In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noahide laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents.”

    “Nevertheless, they [non-Jew babies] may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.”

    [Hence the rampant use of depleted uranium munitions in Gaza, Irag, Afghanistan, etc. causing horrible cancers, miscarriages and gross birth defects.]

    [Oh, and what about the falsified rationale for injecting U.S. unborns, infants and toddlers with mercury and other damaging chemicals?]

    “In any situation in which a non-Jew’s presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created…”

    “A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer.”

    [And so we see why it is that “collateral damage” is mentioned continuously and favorably in U.S./Israeli wars of aggression. It’s perfectly acceptable from the non-Christian tradition which rules both of those two countries.

    Why should we wonder at the continuous undermining of “quaint” or “outdated” Geneva Conventions, Bill of Rights Amendments, etc.?]

  123. Fr. Joseph March 21, 2010 @ 7:04 pm

    Dear Br. Nathanael,

    Regarding our most recent exchange of concerns and ideas, especially with an eye on the New York City matter, and just came out of a contemplative prayerful exchange with the Lord.

    This Insight-Confirmation granted to me ‘washed’ me through with a deep personal consolation with regards to the ‘Whole World’s Fine Mess’ as it dealt with New York City and your problems/vexations as a result of your evangelism efforts there.

    The PEOPLE of New York City THEMSELVES have a PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY to and for themselves, their children, their families, their churches, their parishes, their dioceses, their eparchies, etc.

    If THEY, the people of NEW YORK CITY will not stand up and STAND FOR the Cross of Christ and for the God’s Own Divine Revelation to ALL of Mankind, as well as every last City, Town, Village, Hamlet in every Last Nation-State of our contemporary World WILL NOT stand up for Christ, His Cross, His Divine Revelation to and for ALL of Mankind, then ‘Why?’ are you banging your head against a stone wall and grinding yourself into pulp on all of the Cities’ Streets?

    – Fr. Joseph

  124. enya March 22, 2010 @ 9:08 am

    I suppose now I will be considered an heretic and become a victim of the next Inquisition because I am a Bible-Believer?

    Can anyone tell me why my little Catholic prayerbook includes the Eye of Horus inside the Sun symbol?

  125. Fr. Joseph March 23, 2010 @ 8:50 am


    Deepen your understanding of the Apostolic Faith.

    If your ‘symbols’ bother you so much, then you really and truly ought to consider ‘DUMPING THE BIBLE’ on account of the Catholic Church and consider joining some New Age Cult or Sect such as Scientology…

    “Where We Got The Bible…Our Debt To The Catholic Church” here:

    I’d suggest your spending a Holy Hour before THE LORD in the Blessed Sacrament at your local neighborhood Catholic Church parish.

    THAT would do you a whole heck of lot more good than posting these snippets of shots at the Catholic Church here on RZN.

    – Fr. Joseph

  126. Michael Korn March 26, 2010 @ 10:22 am

    Dear “Prodigal Son” March 20, 2010 @ 2:28 pm

    Concerning your claim that the Old Testament prohibitions of usury do not apply to Christians, a couple of questions:

    1. Why then did the Catholic Church prohibit usury for almost 1000 years? Was it wrong to have done so? And why did it later reverse its position? How often does God change his mind about this?

    2. And if the Church prohibited usury, why did they permit Christians to borrow money, but not lend it, on usury? (How can you stop the sale of illegal drugs if you permit people to buy them?)

    3. One of the major efforts of the Reformers, especially Calvin, was to permit usury, claiming – as you do – that Christians are not bound by its Old Testament strictures. Was he right?

    4. And finally, and perhaps most importantly, if usury is not prohibited for Christians, why do you and so many others complain about the Federal Reserve and the power of Jewish financiers, whose entire modus operandi is based on usury? If you think usury is such a blessing, then why can’t you show some gratitude to the Jewish bankers who furnish its “wonderful” fruits?

    5. Supporting this idea is the following from Matthew:

    Matthew 25:26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:

    27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.

    28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.

    29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.

    30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

    Jesus mentions usury here in a positive way. Perhaps not only does Jesus approve of usurious banking, but He even welcomes the role of Jewish financiers in bankrolling the Catholic Church and other Christian institutions, since that gives these Jews a positive role to play in promoting the Kingdom of God.

    So given all this, why do you so begrudge the Jewish financiers? Is not this the very voice of Adolph Hitler, who spilled so much ink (and later blood) decrying the power of “Jewish International Finance”?

    Do you actually believe in the Gospels, and your claim that Christians are not bound by Old Testament usury laws, or not?

  127. Lynda March 27, 2010 @ 8:46 am

    So what are Israel and ZOGUSA up to in this exchange?

    Some developments post Brother Nathanael’s report:

    Gilad Atzmon reminds us of the old Ben Gurion mantra: “…doesn’t matter what the Goyim say, the only thing that matters is what the Jews do?”

    “Samson and the Second Nakba – A Short Study of the Jewish Hercules:”

    Keith Johnson’s analysis keeps the spotlight on Israel and the state of play on the Grand Chessboard.

    “Lights, Camera, Distraction:”

    Israel builds settlements. ‘Road Map to Peace’ dead end and ZOG moves the bunker busters to Diego Garcia. Think about it.

  128. Nicola April 14, 2010 @ 3:27 am

    I am in process to sending you money. We love you

  129. Rob May 31, 2010 @ 11:26 pm

    I saw the video where he hands over the “gift”.

    I never saw a frame, and he never said “All I have to give you is broken glass”. In fact, I think he’s being sincere. Here’s the video the “gift” is at the end.

  130. derekheretz November 6, 2011 @ 3:20 am

    There is ONLY ONE Palestinian people and ever was: Jewish people.

    And it is well defined under international law:

    Article 7

    The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

    Arabs are committing a criminal crime well known as “identity theft”.

    Arabs are stealing Jewish Palestinian identity to maintain a well organized and financed formative terror system (UNRWA) and to fake Legal right for Palestine – Jewish homeland !!

Leave a comment