Main Contents

Putin & The Battle For Oil


By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008-2011

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

For The Best Post Election Coverage CLICK: Here

VLADIMIR PUTIN IS THE MOST POWERFUL national leader in the world today. Putin’s agenda with regard to the “geopolitics of oil” is to regain Russia’s position as the dominant power in oil-rich Eurasia.

The recent discovery of vast oil reserves in the Caspian Basin turned it into an arena of intense international competition. Zbigniew Brzezinski, an Obama insider, called Eurasia “the axial super continent” & “home to all the historical pretenders to global power.”

Initiating his oil agenda at the very outset of his presidency, Putin told the Azerbaijani parliament in Baku, (home of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline), that his visit was an important step “towards a new phase” in relations with Azerbaijan and Eurasia in general:

“With this new phase of relations, we should seek a higher level of economic ties. Russia wishes to cooperate with Azerbaijan in all aspects of the fuel and energy sectors. We are ready to be involved in the development of oil deposits and the use of our Russian pipelines.” View Entire Story Here.

In two recent “upsets,” Putin bought majority shares in Kazakhstan’s Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) and gained access for a new pipeline to run from Turkmenistan through Kazakhstan before entering Russia from where it will be exported to Europe & China.

Since the Georgian crisis in August of 2008, (which changed the world forever), the key energy states in Eurasia – – Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, & Turkmenistan – – have tilted away from the West and are now safely in Putin’s lap.


“AMERICA NO LONGER produces what the world wants (goods & services) – so it is going to war to control what the world needs (the supply of oil),” observes political analyst Marshall Auerback in his article, Putin And The Geopolitics Of Oil.

When Cheney arrived in Azerbaijan on September 3 2008 to gain that control, President Ilhan Aliyev did not even bother to meet him at the airport. Instead, only the “deputy” Prime Minister showed up. Cheney’s visit was all down hill from there on in.

Not wishing to start an argument with Russia, (after 8-8-08, no one wants to start an argument with Russia), President Aliyev refused Cheney’s request for him to send Azerbaijani natural gas to Europe via the US sponsored Nabucco pipeline. Many oil experts doubt that both the Nabucco & BTC pipelines will ever become a reality.

In the article, Moscow Wins A Major Victory On Pipelines, Eurasian expert Paul Goble sums it all up in Putin’s favor:

“With Iran opposing construction of any undersea pipelines in the Caspian on ‘ecological grounds,’ America’s Nabucco & BTC pipelines will be effectively blocked. Putin can now claim his first major victory from his trouncing of Georgia.” View Entire Story Here.

With the EU agreeing to Putin’s Russia-European Security Pact & in opposing the US missile shields in Eastern Europe, it appears that America is suffering a slow and painful death at the hands of Vladimir Putin.

Methinks That The Stage Is Being Set
For A Planned Zionist-Promoted North American Union


For More See: North American Union Promoted By Jews! Click Here

And: Putin’s Global Agenda Click Here

And: Russia’s ‘Wake Up Call’ To America Click Here

And: The Dollar Drops – The ‘Amero’ Cometh Click Here

And: Is Putin A True Christian Leader? Click Here

CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Please Help Support This Site!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

Brother Nathanael @ November 15, 2008


  1. admin November 15, 2008 @ 11:26 pm

    Hi Everybody –

    This article took hours upon hours of painstaking research. I searched for & read tons of reports on what Brzezinski calls the “home of every pretender for global power,” EURASIA. This is where Amerika started their “war on terror” because the Taliban refused Bush access to pipeline routes.

    But all to no avail — Putin is in control of the area, and as I remarked in the article above, “no one wants to start an argument with Russia,” ever since the trouncing of Amerika’s thug, Saakasvili, despot of Georgia on 8-8-08, the day the world changed forever.

    It is very significant that just today, EU’s current president, Sarkozy, came out in favor of the Russian-European Security Pact & at the same time, expressed his opposition to the US proposed missle shields in Eastern Europe, that is, in Poland and the Czech Republic. (See the last paragraph in the article above).

    In my opinion, (and I have been studying this situation *intensely* for over 2 years now – and praying to Christ for His knowledge of world events), I believe that the stage is being set by the Zionist Jew banking cabal led by the Rothschilds who own the Federal Reserve Bank, (thus they OWN Amerika & Obama), for the fall of Amerika.

    This has come in stages which I will soon do a feature article on: “6 Stages Of America’s Decline;”

    1) America’s Cultural Decline through “multiculturalism” & homosexual/lesbian promotion in the media and Congress.

    2) America’s Industrial Decline through “open trade” (not in the purview of America’s founding fathers) & loss of manufactures and even goods & services.

    3) America’s Financial Decline through the Fed’s “money from book entries” with no production supporting it & the current bailout by a bankrupt America of Jewish banking thieves.

    4) America’s Political Decline through loss of the peoples’ morale in light of “puppet” Presidents NOT keeping their campaign promises of “Change.” Remember “read my lips – no new taxes?”

    5) America’s Dollar Decline through hyper inflation coupled with low demand for even basic commodities.

    6) America’s World-wide Influence Decline through erosion of support & erosion of moral suasion throughout Europe, Eurasia, the Middle & Far East.

    THESE 6 AREAS OF DECLINE will in my opinion become more pronounced in the next year & thus prepare the way for the end of America’s sovereign status opening the door WIDE for a North American Union in which the elitist bankers will conduct their “governance” — the latest popular slogan of the One World Gov boys!

    In closing, I am very grateful to those of you who have contributed to the mission and cause of Real Jew News. It is very encouraging to me to see that readers are willing to “pitch in” and make a financial sacrifice to support Real Jew News.

    For after all, the message of Real Jew News is OUR message, this is OUR mission, this is OUR cause. We are all in this thing together.

    And as Real Jew News grows and support continues and expands, I believe that a “community” will emerge around Real Jew News which could become very EFFECTIVE in combating the Zionist Jews who are hell bent on promoting Anti Christian morals, corrupting American politics, and advancing the rascist, murderous state of IsraHell, the source of global tumult since 1930.

    And now after some 28 hours of 3 days of excruciating & painstaking research, formatting, picture collage preperation and styling, I am ready for the pillow!

    Bless you all and much love to all! +BN

  2. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 12:02 am

    +BN Great story. It ain’t over til its over, though, and we all need to keep praying, because Obama-Brzenzki comedy act are not going to give up that easily on the Chess Game. Obama will switch and bait keeping other countries off balance.

    Expect major agitation kicking up a few notches in Pakistan, East China and Tibet area, and possibly an escalation of the Hindu super-nationalists who are slaughtering Christians. Love in Christ KJ

  3. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 12:18 am

    Greetings in the Lord Jesus from No Cal in Talmudistan:
    Essay on the Byzantine Orthodox teachings on Warfare and Self-defense. Part 1

    @ Fr. John and Fr. Joseph. Is there anything you might add for Ron? This sums up the ancient Byzantine “moral theology”, and is very much the pattern that New Russia has set up. Recall all of Putin’ and Medyedev’s statements during the Georgia-So Ossetia intervention.

    @ Ron. God bless you for waiting. My prayer is that you and others may find this useful and consoling re: questions of Christian self-defense. Orthodoxy has a different, less “legalistic” moral theology (always ‘patristic’) on war and self-defense, but I believe you’ll be pleased with the “practical spirituality” of the Church and her realistic outlook. The Orthodox Church sees herself as “curative” of spiritual disorder, but also very realistic about the fallen world.

    Some of these are consolidations of notes sent to me from an Orthodox military chaplain that I know that was stationed in the Middle East in this go-round.

    Anyone who has ever attended an Orthodox worship service has heard petitions for peace. In the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, the first petitions of the Great Ektenia are for “the peace from above, and for the salvation of our souls” and “the peace of the whole world; for the good estate of the churches of God, and for the union of all men…” Congregants then pray in this opening litany for their parish, the clergy and laity, the officials of the civil government, “for our armed forces everywhere” and their “victory over every enemy and adversary,”their city and all cities, “for peaceful times,” travelers, the sick, the suffering, “captives and their salvation,” and “our deliverance from all tribulation, wrath, danger, and necessity.”

    The litany concludes with a plea for God to “Help us; save us; have mercy on us,” and keep us by His grace. Finally, we remember the Theotokos and “commend ourselves and each other, and all our life unto Christ our God.”

    If the Liturgy is a participation in the eschatological peace of the Kingdom of God, it is fair to ask whether the members of the Church recognize and live out this vision of heavenly peace. An immediate note of realism comes to mind, as the members of the Church are sinners who have not manifested fully the new life of Christ. Nonetheless, the presence of the Holy Spirit enables the Church to embody a foretaste of the eschatological peace of the Kingdom of Heaven, and there is much in the history and ongoing life of the Church which witnesses to the saving peace of God here and now.

    Though there appears some ambiguity in the Church’s pastoral teaching on Christian participation in war, the Orthodox vision of peace prizes selfless love and forgiveness over violence, viewing war in some situations as a lesser, necessary evil with damaging spiritual consequences for all involved.

    Though the Christlike response of “turning the other cheek” to assaults is the spiritual ideal, the Orthodox Church does not prescribe pacifism or nonviolence as a legal requirement of the Christian life. The Church’s moral guidance serves the goal of theosis, of guiding the members of Christ’s Body to growth in holiness and union with the Trinity.

  4. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 12:21 am

    Essay on the Byzantine Orthodox teachings on Warfare and Self-defense. Part 2

    The canons of the Church are applied pastorally in order help particular people find salvation as they seek to be faithful in the given set of challenges and weaknesses which they face. The Church’s experience is that temporal authority and the use of force are necessary to restrain evil and promote good in our fallen world. Though the witness of the early Church was largely — but not exclusively–pacifist, the Byzantine vision was of symphonia or harmony between God’s Kingdom and earthly realms

    In contrast with Orthodoxy, it is easier to describe the traditional Western Christian justifications of war, which include both the granting of plenary indulgences to those who fought in the crusades and the affirmation of just-war theory. The former envisioned the killing of infidels as such a righteous act that the crusaders were released from all temporal punishments for their sins, including exemption from purgatory. The latter, which has been widely influential in western culture, provides moral sanction to wars which meet certain philosophical criteria.

    In contrast to these endorsements of war, Orthodoxy has never embraced the crusade ethic, and Canon XIII of St. Basil the Great prescribes exclusion from the chalice for three years for those who kill in war.

    Orthodoxy has viewed war always as an evil, “but a sometimes necessary evil for the defense of justice and freedom. The only normative ideal is that of peace, and hence the Orthodox Church has never made rules on the subject of “the Law of War”

    Moral rules do not remove the harm to one’s soul of killing another human being, even in war. To take life is to fall short of the norm of Christlike love, and exclusion from Communion for a period may be necessary to allow time for the spiritual healing which is necessary for one to commune worthily with the Lord.

    Father Alexander Webster agrees that a theory of justified war “has never been systematically elucidated in Orthodox moral theology,” and he describes participation in such a war as “a lesser moral option than absolute pacifism, for those unwilling or unable to pay the full price of prophecy.” He suggests that Orthodox criteria for a just war include a “proper political ethos,” meaning that the nation going to war should follow “the natural-law ethic and have positive relations with the Orthodox community.” The war should also take place for the “defense of the People of God” from injustice, invasion, or oppression “by those hostile to the free exercise of the Orthodox faith.” A proper “spiritual intent” should also lead to “forgiveness and rehabilitation” of enemies as persons who bear the image of God, and not “mere revenge, self-righteousness, or conquest.”

    Webster states that: Whereas the pacifist seeks to emulate Jesus as the Good Shepherd who allowed Himself to be slain unjustly by and for sinners, the just warrior perceives a higher duty: to defend the relatively innocent from unjust aggression. If the Orthodox pacifist can never do anything evil even for a reasonably just end, the Orthodox warrior cannot preserve his personal holiness by allowing evil to triumph through his own inaction.

  5. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 12:26 am

    Essay on the Byzantine Orthodox teachings on Warfare and Self-defense. Part 3

    The Orthodox Church considers that killing in self-defense, or the defense of others whose life is clearly threatened, can be considered as a lesser evil than passivity and non-resistance. This is why the Church has never endorsed total pacifism. But she always considers killing – any killing – an evil and a sin, for which man – even a soldier who kills in war – is called to repent, even if this killing was accomplished as a lesser evil, for example, to save the lives of others.

    Someone who holds to the pacifist ideal in those circumstances leaves the innocent defenseless. Pacifism is a solitary and individual principle and not something you can impose on your neighbor. Sometimes your neighbor needs defending. Greater harm, indeed, might befall them and others if they refused to defend the innocent from attack and abuse. In a fallen world populated by sinful people, every Christian’s journey to the Kingdom will be marked by a measure of spiritual brokenness, and repentance is the only road to healing

    A sixth-century Byzantine text on military strategy begins with a note of realism about war:

    “I am well aware that war is a great evil, and even the greatest of evils. But because enemies shed our blood…, because everyone has to defend his homeland and his fellow citizens…, we have decided to write about strategy.”

    Late in the fourth and early fifth centuries, the foundations were laid of what eventually became known as “the Just War Doctrine.” This provided a justification for Christian participation in defensive wars under specific conditions. Even then St. Ambrose (d. 397) and St. Augustine (d. 430) were firm in maintaining the traditional view that the Christian is barred from self defense, but argued that acting in military defense of one’s community, when it was under attack, was a different matter. Yet both insisted that under all circumstances the command to love one’s enemies remained in force.

    The Just War Doctrine had it roots in the classical world. Over the centuries, the doctrine was developed until it reached its classic form in the Middle Ages. Under its terms, a war could be considered just, and Christians may participate, if, without exception, it meets certain criteria: the war must be declared by the legitimate authority. It must be fought for a just cause and with a just intention, not simply to satisfy national pride or to further economic or territorial gain. Just means must be employed, respecting the right to life of the innocent and noncombatants. The war must have a reasonable chance of success. There must be a reasonable expectation that the good results of the war will outweigh the evil caused by it. War must be the last resort. The burden of guilt must be clearly on one side.

  6. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 12:39 am

    Essay on the Byzantine Orthodox teachings on Warfare and Self-defense. Part 4

    The Just War Doctrine is chiefly associated with Western Christianity. In his essay\ “No Just War in the Fathers,” Fr. Stanley Harakas, for many years Professor of Orthodox Theology at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology in Massachusetts, described his search through patristic sources and Byzantine military manuals searching for texts concerning war. He reported:

    ~”I found an amazing consistency in the almost totally negative moral assessment of war coupled with an admission that war may be necessary under certain circumstances to protect the innocent and to limit even greater evils. In this framework, war may be an unavoidable alternative, but it nevertheless remains an evil. Virtually absent in the tradition is any mention of a ‘just’ war, much less a ‘good’ war. The tradition also precludes the possibility of a crusade. For the Eastern Orthodox tradition … war can be seen only as a ‘necessary evil,’ with all the difficulty and imprecision such a designation carries. [”No Just War in the Fathers,” full text on the web site of the Orthodox Peace Fellowship; search “Harakas.”]

    Fr. Harakas discovered what he referred to as the “stratification of pacifism” in the Church: The discipline of not killing others under any circumstances that applied to all baptized Christians in the early Church came to be required only of those serving at the altar and iconographers.

    To this day, Church canons bar those who serve in the sanctuary from having killed anyone for any reason, including accidental homicide. Some priests and deacons practice the asceticism of not driving precisely because of the danger of their accidentally killing someone. (On the other hand, there are bishops who, in acts of pastoral ekonomia, permit clergy to continue their eucharistic service despite their having been responsible for another person’s death.)

    St. John Chrysostomos states: “It is certainly a finer and more wonderful thing to change the mind of enemies to another way of thinking than to kill them…. The mystery [of the Eucharist] requires that we should be innocent not only of violence but of all enmity, however slight, for it is the mystery of peace.”

    “And again from St John Chrysostom:
    We are commanded to have only one enemy, the devil. With him never be reconciled! But with a brother, never be at enmity in your heart.”

    The Church’s experience is that temporal authority and the use of force are necessary to restrain evil and promote good in our fallen world. Though the witness of the early Church was largely — but not exclusively–pacifist, the Byzantine vision was of symphonia or harmony between God’s Kingdom and earthly realms as the ‘Church Militant’.

    Katherine Juliane says “Christians are to love their enemies, but that doesn’t mean we have to be friends with them.”

    Remember the 8-P’s: Prayer, Previous Planning and Preparation Prevents Piss-Poor Performance if the poo poo hits the fan.

  7. Michael K. November 16, 2008 @ 5:49 am

    Dear Brother Nathanael,

    Good article brother, a very clear picture seems to be emerging along the lines you suggest. A note on moral decline, the following appeared before me by chance from the local paper as I crumpled it up to start the fire:


    …In addition, the Camden Harbour Inn is offering a VIP Working Girls Package with an overnight stay, gourmet breakfast and three-course dinner, admission to the show, admission to the after party and a VIP meet-and-greet with the Working Girls following the show…”

    Wow, is gay prostitution being offered here?

    @ KathJuliane-

    Brilliant research on the Orthodox teachings regarding war. Thanks.

  8. Jim DeTexas November 16, 2008 @ 7:51 am

    Beware Brothers and Sisters in Christ…..

    ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~COPIED FROM REPORT~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

    Sunday, January 20, 2008
    Cecil Rhodes: How the NWO, Rockefeller and the CIA changed the Bible to support their cause.

    “In order to move the world into an anti-Christian new world order, the British elites needed to gradually replace the

    authentic English Bible with a counterfeit reflecting their own belief system”

    In 1976, Nelson Publisher initiated the New King James Version. Two meetings of the North American Overview

    Committee met at Nashville and Chicago in 1975 to assist in preparing guidelines for the NKJV. Members of that

    committee and a Nashville Convocation of 1984 included the following high profile members of the Religious Roundtable

    and Council for National Policy: Tim LaHaye, D. James Kennedy, Jerry Falwell, Ben Haden, Mary C. Crowley, W.A.

    Criswell, E.V. Hill, Henry Morris, Bill Bright and Charles Stanley. 110.

    Unholy Hands on God’s Word is the transcript of a 1996 radio interview of Judy Pinalto, who describes the composition of

    the New King James Translation and Review committees which included several members of the CNP and other

    Reconstructionist organizations. In this presentation, Judy demonstrates the dominionist slant of the NKJV:

    “The big problem with these counterfeit Bibles is not only the expunging of verses but the altering of verses. If you take a

    look at the backbone of this political movement, this Reconstructionist social gospel, they use from the modern NIV and

    the New American Standard, out of Matthew 28, they have altered the great commission. This is where, I think, one of

    the great delusion, the great deception, has come in. In the modern versions, the corrupt versions, it says that the great

    commission is to, ‘Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations.’ This is the verse that they use to justify taking turf.

    “In the King James Bible, the correct translation of that verse is, “Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations.” In other words,

    the great commission was to preach the gospel; it wasn’t to take numbers, it wasn’t to take disciples, it wasn’t to take

    the nations, take turf. That is how they have used the modern versions to corrupt the doctrine and to create this

    heretical position that is going on today. So, on these Bible Committees are men who have other agendas.” 111.

    Corrupted versions of the Bible were also used by the Rockefeller-funded Summer Institute of Linguistics to facilitate the

    takeover of Latin America. Instead of translating the Bible literally, SIL preferred a method of translation called dynamic

    equivalency which permitted the translator to alter the language of Scripture, ostensibly to adapt Scripture to the culture.

    Two well-known examples of dynamic equivalency are Today’s English Version (Good News for Modern Man) and the

    Living Bible. In 1975, John Beekman, translations coordinator for Wycliffe Bibles International, gave his unreserved

    endorsement to the Living Bible, which is a mere paraphrase of the Word of God: “The Living Bible is the most readable

    and the most natural English translation available.



    ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~MY FINDINGS~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

    I have 4 different Bibles on my desk 2 of them report Mathew 28:19 as “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations”.

    These 2 are The Watch Tower and Tract Society of Pennsylvania and The New King James Version, 1979 by Thomas


    The Watch Tower finishes Mathew with “and look! I am with you all the days until the conclusion of the system of

    things”. (This Bible also has Jesus Christ impeled on a torture stake)

    The New King James Version finishes Mathew with, “and lo I am with you always, even to the end of the age. Amen”.

    Those both indicate time for man continues on, as in suggestion of the New World Order.

    The 3rd one is 1941 Columbia Educational Books, Inc King James Version. It was handed down from my grandfather to

    my father to me, and reads Mathew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations. The 4th is the one I recived when I

    joined the Masonic lodge and reads as the 1941 King James Version.

    Yes I have made mistakes in my life..

    Both these Bibles end Mathew with, “and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. A’men”.

    Now some have said to me, “They are just words”, others have said, “They are just a guide to help you understand”. I

    have said to both, “They are not just words nor are they just a guide, they are THE WORD and are not to be toyed with.

    One can not stand before the court of God on judgement day and attempt to reason that they were just words.

    My apology for such a long comment.

    Keep the faith……….

  9. Fr. John November 16, 2008 @ 8:00 am

    Clearly, KJ, you read a great deal, and think even more. I am not well-versed in this, having been raised in the West, and not as a Byzantine.

    However, upon coming to an Orthodox phronema, I found the following to be my justification for finally going to gun training classes this last summer, once the US Supreme Court re-affirmed the Founding Fathers’ Second Amendment pertained to ALL citizens:

    “Do I not hate them, O LORD, that hate Thee? And am I not grieved with them that rise up against Thee?
    I hate Thy Enemies, O LORD, with a Perfect* Hatred-
    I count them my enemies”
    -Psalm 139: 21-22

    Be Ye perfect* even as your Father which is in Heaven is Perfect.”* -Matt. 5:48 (the same word for Perfect hatred is contained in Christ’s admonition to BE perfect!) What then, does one make of this statement, which shows that God is a ‘choosing God?’ “You alone of all the nations of the Earth, have I known.”

    * From the Greek “Teleios”- [teleios] – complete, brought to its; end, finished, (cf. John 19:30- “It is Finished”) Lacking nothing in perfection, complete, lacking nothing in human virtue, full. (Strong’s #5046)

    via this thought iterated by a Saint:

    “Live in peace not only with your friends, but also with your enemies;
    But only with your personal enemies,
    and not with the enemies of God.”
    -St. Theodosius of the Kiev Caves Lavra

    Thus, the OT commands to kill the ‘goyim’ that challenged the people of the OT, and the awareness that, while a sin, defense of life and family by a Christian is the ‘greater good’, I would tend to be less a fan of a pacifist mindset such as the “Suffering slave soul’ construct that seems to have stymied Russia during the Bolshevik years, especially when we see the same ethnic people destroying our country today.

    This is a topic that could be a great book, if you wanted to write it, KJ. LOL

  10. Jim DeTexas November 16, 2008 @ 8:23 am

    2 Bro Nathanael,

    Very very good artical.

    The Grand Chess Game plays out.

    Since this “GAME” they are playing is so deadly serious it would have been nice if they had asked us if we wanted to play, and explained the rules…

    I believe most of us would have opted out.

  11. rich November 16, 2008 @ 9:50 am

    yea, russia made a step into the artic trying for energy dominence there, but every economic nation is scrunging for oil !!!!!

  12. admin November 16, 2008 @ 11:45 am



    Hi Everybody – “Deputy Chief Of Staff” Mona Stutphen is a Jew & buddies with Rahmbo.

    Her brother is a lobbyist for the Homo/Lesbian/LOGO TV & youth corrupting MTV & Zionist lying CBS owner, “Sumner Redstone” whose real name is Murray Rothstein.

    Mona Stutphen’s brother is mentioned in the AP article as lobbyist for VIACOM which is the parent company of Rothstein’s holdings.

  13. Tom November 16, 2008 @ 11:57 am

    I dont think the world knows just how greatful they should be for Putin and Medvedevs control over Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and the other.

    Without Russia these nations would fall into radical Islamic anarchy….to which the west would no doubt feed because of the zionist fabrications of terrorism. Without Russia it would only be a matter of time before the excuse for oil would declare these nations terrorist states like Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc.

    Its not Russia. Its not the US! Its not Europe! Its the jews!

    The jews want to use the war on terror to maintain control over foreign policy, treasuries and the middle east.

    The truth is that the US needs Russia. Europe needs Russia and Russia needs both the US and Europe.

    The missiles not going into eastern Europe is a good thing. Saber rattling there could cost millions of lives as they have historically between major powers and though these nations are scared…feeding that fear…could be devastating.

    Euope is embracing Russia and Russia is embracing Europe. Russia is the perfect market for Europes consumer and technology goods. Europe is the perfect market for Europes energy with backup in instable north africa.

    Europe & Russia has the ability to turn its back on the jews and zionism.

    Obamas Chief of STaff Rahm Emmanuel has dual US/ISrali citizenship, he is a mossad agent and an agent of the Israeli military. If the jews are that well entrenched into the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, the banking system, the media, the Presidents Executive Branch, the Congress/Senate Legislative Branch … then I dont know how or what would extracate the US to its own manifest destiny rather than a proxy puppet banana republic for Israel.

    Gotta give them credit. The jews did what no other world power could do (not britain, france, germany or spain could do)…they turned the US into a puppet regime for a foreign power.

  14. Wise Serpent November 16, 2008 @ 2:29 pm

    The older I get the more I realize that pretty much 99% of all people want what others have.

    Some are blatant thieves who take your possessions and run.

    Others encroach on your sphere of influence. Have you ever heard of a neighbour accidentally setting up a boundary fence 6″ too far on his own side? No, it’s always inches on your side. The human being is kudzu.

    A future Ghengis Khan is walking the globe at the present time. All nations are going to get what their kudzu brains deserve: a lesson.

  15. Michael K. November 16, 2008 @ 3:09 pm

    @ Wise Serpent-

    “Verily I say unto ye, the wisdom of Man is the foolishness of God.”

  16. Visitor November 16, 2008 @ 3:19 pm

    Ultimately, it is not the Jews, it is us, the Jews are just the barrier of our fall, of last resort.

    Think where the Christians would be if whenever our faith cooled, the Jews would not cause us trouble and hardship, turning us back to the Lord?

  17. KathJuliane November 16, 2008 @ 6:04 pm

    Just off of ‘Huffington Post’-

    The arch-NeoCon murdering thug Kissinger himself, and others falling in line like Schwartznegger, are publicly “recommending” the shrill womanoid Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State to fill out more of the Harlequin President Obama’s administration.

    So, I wasn’t hallucinating. The Clintonista organized crime cartel has “their” White House back, not that the Bushes and NeoCons are counted out, since old Bilious is an “adopted son” of Daddy Bush.

    The classic Harlequin character wore a black mask with painted quizzical eyebrows and a dazzling bright patchwork clown costume in the theatrical harlequinades. Is everyone getting this theater of the absurd, and is there no doubt about the “Magic Mulatto”?

    Years ago, radical Blacks used to deprecatingly call someone like Obama-quin an “oreo cookie”-black on the outside and white on the inside.

    The womanoid, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her first public appearance since one-time rival Barack Obama was elected president, gushed over his choice for White House chief of staff Rahm Emmanuel, a former top aide to Bill Clinton, let us not forget.

    “President-elect Obama made an excellent choice,” she said of Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel.

    She said Emanuel “understands both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.”

    “He gets things done,” she said at a news conference Thursday night before she and former President Clinton were honored at a gala at the newly refurbished Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum. “Rahm is determined and effective.”

    From the Yiddish “dictionary” ~Mishpocheh~ or ~mishpokhe~ or ~mishpucha~ means “family,” as in “Relax, you’re mishpocheh. I’ll sell it to you at wholesale.”

    When Rahmbo was selected by Obama-quin, reportes asked Hilary-ous about some of their long-standing ideological quarrels during the Clinton White House, and the political pre-election feuding among the Dems.

    At some point, un-Emmanuel made peace with the womanoid about backing Obama-quin over her during the campaign.

    Hilary-ous literally told Rahmbo “Relax, you’re mishpocheh.”

    Well, what the heck, fellow patriotic Americans. The Mischpocheh of Thieves is moving in lox, stocks of bagels, and kosher dill pickle barrels into the White House.

    No problem! The Bushes already kosherized the White House kitchen to the joy of the Rabbis present a long time ago!

    Oreo cookie, anyone?

  18. joshua November 16, 2008 @ 9:54 pm

    To Visitor : ~~~~ Christian Faith in North America has not ‘cooled’… it has been picked apart from the inside, and destroyed by the T.V. ~~~~ ON PURPOSE, BY JEWS !

  19. joshua November 16, 2008 @ 10:18 pm

    According to what I can find – Obama’s ethnicity is 50% white, 43.75% arab, and 6.25% black… so ?

  20. Serge November 16, 2008 @ 11:49 pm is now more popular than! People want to know the truth.

    Brother Nathaniel, have you been following CA Proposition 8? The homosexuals are promising violence, boycotts, protests and have already started. We can guess which side the Hollywood Jews are on!

  21. Orthodox Russian November 16, 2008 @ 11:58 pm

    @ KathJuliane

    Great postings.

    Pakistan and U.S. Have Tacit Deal On Airstrikes

    The United States and Pakistan reached tacit agreement in September on a don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy that allows unmanned Predator aircraft to attack suspected terrorist targets in rugged western Pakistan, according to senior officials in both countries.

    Story here

    The meaning is US bribed Pakistan leaders and agreed to let corrupt criminals bomb anywhere in Afghanistan any time they want and they can eventually make a false flag ops with using nukes and blame it on India to provoke ww3.

    God have mercy on us!

  22. Eternal Love November 18, 2008 @ 11:22 am

    In December Putin will answer his countrymen’s questions…

    nice picture of him

    Eternal Love

  23. KathJuliane November 21, 2008 @ 7:40 pm

    “The Empire’s New Middle East Map:
    ethnic cleansing and petroleum geography using religious and ethnic divisions
    to split Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia to control their oil rich provinces.

    “A new map for Peak Oil Wars:
    Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, former Soviet Georgia, Africa and others.

    “In June 2006, Armed Forces Journal published this map from Ralph Peters, a prominent pro-war strategist. It shows the method to the madness — creating ethnic tension and civil war in order to redraw the boundaries. Most of the existing borders were imposed by Britain and France after World War I – and conveniently (for the US and Europe) divide most of the Arabs from most of the oil. Note that their new “Arab Shia State” would contain much of the oil, separating governments in Riyadh, Baghdad and Tehran from what is currently the main source of their national wealth.

    Blood borders
    How a better Middle East would look
    By Ralph Peters
    Armed Forces Journal – June 2006

    note: the online version of this article no longer has a link to these maps

    …”The US empire is playing a “Good cop / bad cop” strategy where the neo-cons wrecked Iraq but the neo-liberals are in agreement that Iraq should be partitioned (which would allow the US greater control over the oil). If the bulk of the remaining oil was in places that were predominantly Buddhist or Hindu, the US would be waging a war on Buddhism or Hinduism.

    “The national borders of the Middle East countries were mostly drawn by British and French imperialist bureaucrats around 1920, not by citizens of these nations. These lines separate the bulk of the Arab peoples from the bulk of the oil wealth, a quasi-Apartheid situation deeply resented by millions of poor Arabs. The Arab world is roughly divided into countries with large populations and little oil, and countries with little populations and large amounts of oil (an oversimplification, but the general point is valid). But these configurations still allow for nationalist control over tremendous oil resources – which the US empire still resents.

    The neo-cons call the current Middle East conflict “World War IV,” since they consider the many wars under the umbrella of the Cold War to have been World War III. If you add up the number of bodies in the wars between 1945 and 9/11, the casualties are comparable to World War II.

    Some of the neo-cons have publicly proclaimed that their goal for the War on Iraq (and eventually, its neighbors) is to redraw the borders of the Middle East. The ostensible reason given for this arrogance is to separate feuding ethnic and religious groups from each other. However, if you combine maps of the “new Middle East” sought by these armchair warriors with maps of the oil fields, a more sinister motive becomes obvious. Dividing up Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia would allow the consolidation of most of the region’s oil into a new country (which presumably would be allied to the United States). This would remove control over the oil from governments based in Baghdad, Tehran and Riyadh, allowing new arrangements of control to be established.

    The supposed “failure” of the Bush Cheney invasion of Iraq allows for a new administration to supposedly fix the problems of their civil war by splitting Iraq into three new states – a Kurdish enclave in the north, a Shiite Arab state in the south, and a Sunni region in the center. Most of Iraq’s oil would be concentrated in the Shiite region, with lesser amounts in the Kurdish part, and very little would remain for the Sunnis. This would allow the US to focus its occupation and manipulation on the parts of Iraq that have oil, and the parts without oil could be ignored.”

  24. KathJuliane November 21, 2008 @ 7:52 pm

    Peak Oil Hoax

    I’ve taken out the ‘h’ on these links trying to get them past the spam filter. Copy from ‘www’ and paste directly onto





    Was ‘Peak Oil’ a Multi-Billion Dollar Hoax?

    Here is what Abdallah S. Jum’ah, Saudi Aramco’s president and CEO, during his address at the 11th Congress of the World’s Energy Council in Rome last November, as the price of oil was accelerating:
    We have grossly underestimated mankind’s ability to find new reserves of petroleum, as well as our capacity to raise recovery rates and tap fields once thought inaccessible or impossible to produce….we still have almost a century’s worth of oil under the conservative scenario…and nearly 200 years’ worth under the target scenario. As a result I do not believe the world has to worry about ‘peak oil’ for a very long time.

    Apparently nobody was listening to the Saudis, as everybody was focused on making the case for peak oil production as a justification for higher prices.

    While we do not have the analytical resources of the Wall Street investment bank that first produced the $150 per barrel price forecast and then the $200 per barrel forecast, we do think OPEC has regained credibility for knowing something about their market. Perhaps in the future we should be paying more attention to OPEC and less to Wall Street analysts.

  25. joshua November 22, 2008 @ 8:58 pm

    The Saudis had better be careful ! ~~~ We saw what happened to Saddam after he tried to keep the price of oil at $25 a barrel… what he described as “a fair price”.

  26. Takeover November 28, 2008 @ 6:17 pm

    There is a restructuring of the United States upper middle class ongoing.

    Rich American Jews invite the arrogant intelligent rich from other countries to take over college teaching positions, physician openings, even attorney and storeowner placements, instead of hiring Christian Americans.

    The rich Hindus believe their goodness in past lives entitles them to a life of riches, and they have no contact with everyday, less rich Americans.

    But they are not mercenary as Jews are.

Leave a comment