Main Contents

German Jews Demand ‘No Mercy’ For Demjanjuk

EU Articles, Holocaust Hype Articles

German Zionist Jews, Lala Suesskind (Head Of Berlin Jewish Community) &
Charlotte Knobloch (President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany)
Greet Zionist-shill, Angela Merkel, At The Synagogue Of Ryke Street In Berlin


By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2009-2011

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Jew News (SM)

Please Help Support This Site!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

For The Best Alternative News Coverage CLICK: Here

“THERE SHOULD BE NO MERCY SHOWN TO ANY living Nazi war criminals regardless of their age.”

This was declared by the German Zionist-Jew, Charlotte Knobloch, President of the Central Council Of Jews In Germany, upon the arrival of 89 year-old John Demjanjuk from the United States on May 12, 2009.

Although never found guilty before a jury of his peers, Demjanjuk faces charges filed against him by German Jews that he was an “accessory to murder” in connection with his alleged time as a guard at the Sobibor internment camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.

Demjanjuk’s sorry plight began in 1986, when he was stripped of his US citizenship and deported to Israel when accused by Zionist Jewish leaders of being “Ivan the Terrible” – a notorious prison guard at the Treblinka internment camp.

The Israeli Supreme Court overturned Demjanhuk’s conviction and death sentence for war crimes, when evidence emerged that he was not “Ivan The Terrible.” Demjanjuk was returned to the US and settled in Cleveland, Ohio, where after regaining his citizenship in 1998, he was employed as an auto worker.

But Knobloch and the rest of German Jewry, which Knobloch represents, not satisfied with Demjanjuk’s vindication, announced, “Now after Demjanjuk’s legal wrangling to block his expulsion from America, German authorities must move forward swiftly to try him.”

Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, said that Demjanjuk “deserves to be punished.” In other words, in Zionist-Jewish “justice,” a man is GUILTY before charges are proven.

Even though Demjanjuk denies the charges made against him by the bloodthirsty Jews, claiming that he was a prisoner of war when captured in German-occupied Ukraine and never a camp guard, Knobloch urges “swift justice” (“Zionist-Jewish justice”) against Demjanjuk, saying, “We have waited too long to see Demjanjuk answer for the charges filed against him.

DEMJANJUK’S FAMILY HAD LONG FOUGHT his deportation from the United States, arguing that flying the wheelchair-bound man with a kidney disease and blood disorders to Germany would cause him pain amounting to torture.

Demjanjuk’s deportation marked the end of months of legal resistance which culminated in an appeal to the Jewish-controlled US Supreme Court, which refused to even hear Demjanjuk’s case.

Germany, at the behest of Zionist Jews, to whom the once-Christian nation must bow, issued a warrant for Demjanjuk’s arrest in March of 2009 on charges of “assisting” in the murder of 29,000 Jews as a guard at the Sobibor internment camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. View Entire Story Here, Here & Here.


ACCOMPANIED BY A DOCTOR AND AN ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN PRIEST, John Demjanjuk arrived in Germany on May 12, 2009, after being deported from the United States to face charges that he “assisted” in the murder of 29,000 Jews. (Where do the Holocaust-Hounding Jews come up with these numbers?)

Demjanjuk landed in a specially-chartered plane at an isolated area of Munich airport where he was met by officials from the state prosecutor’s office who greeted the ailing Demjanjuk with a public declaration of the charges made against him.

The Orthodox Christian Demjanjuk was then immediately transferred to the nearby Stadelheim prison where he must await the blood thirsty Jews’ vengeance of “no mercy” to be applied to his unproven case. Demjanjuk’s relatives affirm that there is nothing to tie him to any deaths at the camp.

“Given the history of this case and not a shred of evidence that my father ever hurt one person let alone murdered anyone anywhere, this is inhuman even if the courts have said it is lawful,” Demjanjuk’s son, John Jr, told reporters the day prior to his father’s deportation into the hands of blood-thirsty Jews. “This is not justice,” John Jr emphasized, “this is a vendetta in the falsified name of justice.” View Entire Story Here.

In his syndicated column of April 14, 2009 – labeling Zionist Jews as the “true haters” – the world-renowned and highly respected political analyst, Pat Buchanan, called Demjanjuk an “American Dreyfus” and “the sacrificial lamb whose blood washes away the stain of Germany’s sins.” Buchanan continued in his April 14, 2009 article, “The True Haters:

“The spirit behind the US Justice Department’s efforts to bring Demjanjuk to justice is the same satanic brew of hate and revenge that drove another innocent Man up Calvary that first Good Friday 2,000 years ago.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

American Jewish leaders reacted in their typical vicious fashion against the conservative and devout Christian, Pat Buchanan, by calling his remarks in defense of Demjanjuk, “obscene.” Labeling Buchanan as a spokesmen for the “Christian right,” US Jewish leaders intensified their censure of Buchanan for “his offensive views on Israel and Jews.”

Phillip Klein, Zionist Jewish publicist of The American Spectator, began the slanders against Buchanan on April 15, 2009, calling him a “Jew baiter:”

“It’s bad enough that Pat Buchanan is rising to defend John Demjanjuk, but his column is an example of classic ‘Jew-baiting.’

Buchanan attempts to paint contemporary Jews as hypocrites by referring to Demjanjuk as an ‘American Dreyfus,’ a reference to the high-profile case of Anti-Semitism and injustice. This is the typical, ‘see, Jews aren’t victims, they’re persecutors,’ tactic routinely employed by Anti-Semites.” View Entire Story Here.

On April 27, 2009, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, censured Buchanan for not only making an “obscene” defense of Demjanjuk, but vehemently denounced Buchanan for telling an audience: “Our culture is superior because our religion is Christianity and that is the truth that makes men free.” (Jews fear Christianity as a threat to their hegemony and to their cover as “innocent victims.”)

The JTA continued their maligning of Buchanan saying: “Buchanan has referred to Capitol Hill as ‘Israeli-occupied territory’ and he considers the State of Israel to be ‘a strategic albatross draped around the neck of the United States.'” View Entire Story Here.

Methinks, O Ye Zionist Jews,
That Pat Buchanan Has It Right, Completely Right…


For More See: Jews Out For Williamson’s Blood For ‘Holocaust Denial’ Click Here

And: Jews & Their Guilt Of Deicide Click Here

And: Hoffman On ‘Holocaustianity’ Click Here

And: Germany’s Forbidden Words Click Here

And: French Comedian Faces Trial For ‘Anti Semitism’ Click Here

CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Please Help Support This Site!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

Brother Nathanael @ May 24, 2009


  1. admin May 24, 2009 @ 7:49 pm

    Dear Everybody Of Our Precious Real Zionist News Family & All Readers Of RZN –

    First of all, I think it is high time that I again explain the reason for OUR Web Site, Real Zionist News.

    I began this site in September of 2007 because being raised as a Jew in an upper middle class synagogue and becoming an Orthodox Christian in my early adult years, I finally felt it necessary to EXPOSE what the Christ-Hating Jews, who NOW CONTROL & RULE America and the rest of the Western world through their MONEY & POLITICAL $$$ INFLUENCE in governments and in the Courts, are doing to ERADICATE Christianity.

    The Jews HATE the Christian message because it tells them that they MUST REPENT (Jews find this concept absolutely repugnant) and that their leaders MURDERED GOD which is labeled “DEICIDE.” (See my article listed above.)

    Now, after almost 2 years of having this site up, MILLIONS have learned the message that this site brings to them.

    Our site, REAL ZIONIST NEWS, continues to GROW, daily.

    Thus I am asking all of you to please consider making a donation, that is, if this site is a REGULAR with you. I could use the help and the encouragement as well.

    A Donation Feature Button is at the top & bottom of this and every article. Or you may simply CLICK:

    This is a HASSLE FREE way of donation.

    Donations May Also Be Sent SAFELY by Mail To:
    Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    Many Thanks In Advance.

    ALSO, please consider helping out with my Street Evangelism Efforts.

    NYC was so succesful last week that I booked another reservation at the Youth Hostel for July 7-14, 2009.

    I love you all, I pray for you all DAILY, and ask that you keep me in your prayers as well.

    Your +Brother In Christ, Nathanael

  2. Hoff May 24, 2009 @ 10:17 pm

    Hehe … This is GOOD)))) We are talking some serious jewish whipping here.

    “Professor Tony Martin The Khazars (jew) onslaught pt1”

  3. Hoff May 24, 2009 @ 11:03 pm

    “Israeli 911 terrorism ties FOX news report now CLASSIFIED”

  4. Jim DeTexas May 25, 2009 @ 4:06 am

    It will be most interesting when the Zionist Jews are brought to justice to be tried under the same rules of evidence they have set fourth in seeking “justice” against others.

    One day their two tier justice system will fall and they will be placed in the same system the rest of us face.

    Very good article Bro Nat

  5. steve dalton May 25, 2009 @ 4:48 am

    The more I see of the cruel way Jews behave toward non-Jews, the less sympathy I have for their so-called suffering down through the ages!

  6. Fr. John May 25, 2009 @ 4:50 am

    Patrick Buchanan occasionally levels a blow that smacks of the courage that once was found, in Roman laity and clergy in the ‘good ol’ days’ before Vatican II. His books have been instrumental in learning about the ‘lies of the sons’ of whom Christ said Lucifer was their father. [ John 8:44] I hold him as an enigmatic (he is not consistent in his ‘calling a spade a spade’ – but that is ALSO because he is RC) but excellent author, who gets most things correct, most of the time.

    His allusion to ‘l’affaire Dreyfus’ noted above, is STELLAR. This was the first REAL WEDGE the apostate deicides used in their war against Christendom, back in the 1880’s. The famous ‘J’Accuse!’ of Zola brought deluded liberal artists and writers to the defense of a man who was less than worthy of defense – the puny Jew, Dreyfuss.

    These “Dreyfussards” (as they were called) were instrumental in breaking down [sic] ‘anti-semitism’ on the part of the WHOLE French Nation, which led to the breaking down of what remained of the French Church, destroyed as she had been from the 1791 Revolution.

    From Dreyfuss, it was but a small step until Jews were ensconced in France’s ‘artist’ movement, and their hedonism, their utter disregard for Christian morality, and the ‘kickiness’ of ‘some of my best friends are Jewish’ mentalities among the Aristocracy and the ‘new artists’ of France, led eventually to Camus and Sartre, Genet and Picasso, which means utter negation, hopelessness, despair, and anti-incarnationalism.

    The weasel-like response of Klein (which means ‘little’ in German) noted above, clearly shows HOW MUCH they FEAR Buchanan. If he could have ignited America in his bid for the Republican party’s nomination back when, we might have avoided the last 16 years. But who controls the political machine? Ah yes… And for that, for them, it is ‘never forgive, and never forget.’

    Buchanan be ‘da man’!

  7. Son of Jeffer May 25, 2009 @ 5:41 am

    Thanks again Bro Nate for the good article!
    Other good websites

    Also at watch “Money Masters”

  8. Jason May 25, 2009 @ 7:04 am

    Sounds like persecution to me.

    Treating an ill, 89-year-old man like this is truly sick.

    I can’t wait for these people to get theirs.

  9. Enya May 25, 2009 @ 9:08 am

    Well now, did’nt they crucify Christ Jesus?

  10. Serbian Nationalist May 25, 2009 @ 9:14 am

    Zionist Jews funded the Nazi Party!

  11. Jim DeTexas May 25, 2009 @ 10:39 am

    Take a visit to ( ) and browse through thier archives they are loaded with Zionist Jew justice.

    These people will spend millions covering up exposure, pointing thier finger at others, or just using misdirection.

    Take the pizza delivery guy with the bomb collar for instance…….

  12. Bernie Dombrowsky May 25, 2009 @ 11:19 am

    Check out the Wikipedia article on John Demjanjuk. A person from Germany deleted remarks that mentioned German refusal to punish its own war criminals

    This is what was deleted:

    “Meanwhile, it must be noted that a pundit like [[John Rosenthal]] considers the coming proceedings against this non-German to be a [[show trial]] “in order to create a myth of German vigilance” since “many homegrown and authentic Nazi war criminals are living in Germany”:

    “Germany’s pursuit of Demjanjuk creates the impression that Germany is extraordinarily thorough about prosecuting Nazi war crimes. And this indeed must be the point of the exercise — because the reality could hardly be more different. Since the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949, the German courts and the German legislature have displayed incredible indulgence toward Nazi war criminals, transforming the territory of the Federal Republic … into a more or less safe haven for them.”

    [ The Demjanjuk Farce: Germany Prepares a Show Trial] by [[John Rosenthal

  13. Kenzo May 25, 2009 @ 12:39 pm

    It seems to me that if the Jewish lobby wants to make an example out of DEMJANJUK even if he isn’t guilty, then there should also be trials for former eastern block bolshevik jews.

    Many were guards in the infamous gulag system and many are guilty of genocide.

  14. Maria May 25, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

    I don’t know what the “evidence” is on Demjanjuk, but I do know that in the early days of the US, many blacks were lynched on supposition alone with no fair trial…and given we have a Black President now, who is looking to appoint a Supreme Court Justice who “combines empathy with understanding” and “how our laws affect the daily realities of people’s lives” it would be appropriate for him to investigate these “charges.”

  15. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 2:07 pm

    Re:The Serb-Croat antagonism. The documented reality is that the Serbs in both royalist and communist Yugoslavia were the ruling and priviliged nation and that they ran the country with the help of the army and police. It is important to bear in mind that in Serb-dominated communist Yugoslavia history was systematically falsified. – Joeglas


    Systematically falsified by whom? Jewish and gentile Communists or ethnic Serb nationals? The Jewish-owned leftist international press? You will find a 1957 archived article from the Jewish-owned liberal UK Guardian that gushingly praises the Leninist Marxist Moshe Pijade in the most obnoxious propaganda of adoration possible.

    First of all, Joeglas, even “the little Jews” suffer at the hands of Jewish monsters when it serves their propaganda and apparatchik purposes.

    Secondly, none of this is directed at those Jews of good conscience and anti-Zionist “America-firsters” after finally getting some truth out from under Jewish-controlled mainstream media about Palestine and the 60 years of reprehensible and despicable treatment.

    Factoring in the shapeshifting facility of Jews, and routinely assuming gentile-sounding names as was the habit of the Communist Jews in America and abroad, the problem is that under Tito, Jews registered themselves by national identity, ie. simply Croat, Greek, Albanian, Slovenian, Serb, etc. without also a “Jewish” category in the census.

    And then, the most amazing thing also happened. When Israhell declared independence, why at least two Yugoslav Jews were easily able to immigrate.

    Wasn’t Tito a Croatian as well as a Soviet-backed Communist partisan?

    If I recall, even Time Mag once described Tito in terms like a sphinx or a cypher, or a mystery man. And Croatia his home republic? And wasn’t Croatia the wealthiest of the autonomous republic under Tito?

    And supposedly the power behind him for a long time was Moshe Pijade, the Jewish president of the Yugoslav Parliament, who was reputed to be a very staunch friend of the old Jewish Soviet Kremlin.

    Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav Communist People’s Army.

    Tito’s top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Serb, Croatian and Slovene Christians.

    Pijade later served as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At least eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People’s Army were Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms shipments to Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.

    Israel’s 60th Anniversary
    ‘A Jew from Morning to Night’

    Holocaust survivor Tommy Lapid, his wife, writer Shulamit Lapid, and their son, journalist and television presenter Yair Lapid, talk about their life, their successes and their day-to-day fears in Israel, which celebrates the 60th anniversary of its founding this week.

    SPIEGEL: Tommy, where were you on May 14, 1948, when David Ben-Gurion proclaimed the State of Israel in Tel Aviv?

    Tommy Lapid: I was living in Yugoslavia, under the Tito regime. When I heard about the declaration of independence [of Israhell, immediately ratified by Stalin’s USSR, followed by Zionist-controlled US], I was very happy that my people had finally gotten a state of their own. But I couldn’t have dreamed that I myself would become an Israeli.

    Tito had hermetically sealed off Yugoslavia. But then something unexpected happened. Tito had a friend, the painter and communist Moshe Pijade. They had been in prison together, and when Tito became president, Pijade said to him: We have been friends for 40 years. I have never asked you for a favor. But now I beg you: Let my people go. In the middle of the Israeli war of independence, my mother and I arrived at Haifa on a ship. It was my 17th birthday. We were still at the harbor when I signed up for the army.
    From the archives: The death of Moshe Pijade
    18 March 1957

    The death of Moshe Pijade has robbed the Communist movement of its only licensed buffoon.

    His stooping figure and ill-pressed suit, his absurd round spectacles and his smile ever twitching with the promise of some wry irreverence, will be missed in Yugoslavia by many who loathed his beliefs and the methods he used to enforce them. One of his reputed remarks has passed into the national folklore.

    At the time of the dispute with Russia, when every Yugoslav was nervously trying to discover the truth behind the screams of dialectic jargon, Pijade was said to have made a “private answer to Stalin”. It was one phrase, short and indelicate, and it was quoted with delight throughout the country. The Yugoslavs felt themselves free. Pijade had voiced the general will.

    It was this reputation as a jester, far more than his skill as Yugoslavia’s Archbishop of Marxist theory, that made him such an attractive public figure. He could set a crowd laughing even before he began his speech. But the most singular fact about Pijade is simply that he managed to end his days in peace and honour.

    If there had not been a quarrel with Russia and if Yugoslavia had undergone one of those purges that took place in the rest of Eastern Europe, he could never have survived. He had precisely the background that Stalin most disliked and distrusted. He was a Jew, a veteran Communist (with old-fashioned Leninist ideas), a resistance leader during the war, and above all he had not been trained in Moscow.

    Like Koca Popovic, the surrealist poet turned Foreign Minister, he had once enjoyed himself among the artists of Paris, and his odd self-portrait in the Belgrade National Gallery owes little to “Soviet Realism”. His survival as a Communist through 37 years of imprisonment, torture and civil war has been almost unparalleled.

    He was a fanatic, but not just a fanatic. He took fortitude from his sense of the absurd and he could grin his way through disaster.

  16. Isabella May 25, 2009 @ 3:12 pm

    Nuke Nation

    The hypocrisy inherent in the condemnation of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and the obsessive focus on “rogue states” such as North Korea, while totally ignoring Israel’s provocative arsenal, is breathtaking.

    The existence of the Israeli nuclear program is a serious impediment to meaningful nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. The time is long overdue for citizens concerned about sanctions against Iraq, peace with justice in the Middle East, and nuclear disarmament, to confront directly the issue of Israeli weapons of mass destruction.”

    Israeli academic Israel Shahak commented in 1997: “The wish for peace, so often assumed as the Israeli aim, is not in my view a principle of Israeli policy, while the wish to extend Israeli domination and influence is.” He added: “Israel is preparing for a war, nuclear if need be, for the sake of averting domestic change not to its Liking, if it occurs in some or any Middle Eastern states… Israel clearly prepares… to use for the purpose all means available, including nuclear ones.”

    It is clear Israel has no interest in peace except that which is dictated on its own terms, and has absolutely no intention of negotiating in good faith to curtail its nuclear program or discuss seriously a nuclear-free Middle East.

    Many Middle East peace activists have been reluctant to discuss, let alone challenge, the Israeli monopoly on nuclear weapons in the region, leading to incomplete and uninformed analyses and flawed action strategies.

    But placing the issue of Israeli weapons of mass destruction directly on the table would have several salutary effects.

    First, it would expose the primary destabilizing dynamic driving the Middle East arms race and compelling the region’s states to each seek their own “deterrent.”

    Second, it would expose the grotesque double standard which sees the U.S. and Europe on the one hand condemning Iraq, Syria and North Korea for developing weapons of mass destruction, while simultaneously protecting and enabling the principal culprit.

    Third, exposing Israel’s nuclear strategy will help focus international public attention, resulting in increased pressure to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction and negotiate in good faith.

    Finally, a nuclear-free Israel could reasonably be expected to result in a Nuclear-Free Middle East, making a comprehensive regional peace agreement much more likely.

    Unless and until the world community confronts Israel over its covert nuclear program, it is unlikely there will be any meaningful resolution of the Israeli/Arab conflict, a fact that Israel is apparently counting on as the Sharon era dawns.

  17. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 3:51 pm

    Dear joeglas,

    One of the more difficult concepts for me to grasp was the idea of a tightly knit revolutionary “Jews-sans-borders”, finally established as a real democratic government as the ‘Zionist Organization’ (now WZO)or “the International Jew”, and get beyond the perception that everything was somehow simply on an a local and national scale. It took awhile, but the leftist Judeo-Nazi-Communist-Zionist-Fascist-Socialist-Masonic thugs always have the same modus operandi in whatever country they operate.

    “The portraits above are of the same man but in two different incarnations. [See website] On the left we see Martin “Gray” in retirement after a successful career peddling fake antiques to gullible collectors. He is holding his mass market paperback, For Those I Loved, which is filled with his exploits as a saintly “Holocaust Survivor” who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of the Treblinka “gas chamber.”

    The earlier portrait on the right is of the youthful Gray as a decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD (the forerunner of the KGB), responsible for the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles in Russia and Eastern Europe. Even Establishment researchers have had to admit that Gray’s book is as phony as the antiques he peddled.

    But Gray’s scam is symbolic of countless other Communist ghouls who have managed to land on their feet in the West, disguised as poor, persecuted “Survivors of the Holocaust” and feted as the saints and martyrs of the universe. Meanwhile the holocaust they perpetrated against millions of Christians slips further down the dark environs of Orwell’s memory hole.”

    List of some notable Judeo-Communist Jews without borders:

    Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (pictured at left): chief mass murderer for Stalin, ordered the deaths of millions and the wholesale destruction of Christian monuments and churches, including the great Cathedral of Christ the Savior. Standing amid the rubble of the cathedral, Kaganovich proclaimed, “Mother Russia is cast down. We have ripped away her skirts.” (N.Y. Times, Sept. 26, 1995).

    Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry, supervisor of slave labor, brother of Lazar. Rosa Kaganovich: Stalin’s mistress; sister of Lazar. Paulina Zhemchuzina: member of the Central Committee and wife of Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov. Olga Bronstein: officer, Soviet Cheka Secret Police, sister of Trotsky, wife of Kamenev.

    Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police, mass murderer extraordinaire. (Jewish poet Romain Rolland, winner of the Nobel Prize, wrote a hymn of praise to Yagoda).

    Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag death camp system.
    Lev Inzhir, commissar for Soviet death camp transit and administration. Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of Matvei. K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.

    Firin, Rappoport, Kogan, Zhuk: commissars of death camps and slave labor, supervised the mass deaths of laborers during the construction of the White Sea–Baltic Canal.

    M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police. Slutsky and Shpiegelglas: commanders, Soviet Secret Police. Isaac Babel: officer, Soviet Secret Police.

    Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army; officer, Soviet Secret Police. Feldbin was chief of Soviet Security in the Spanish Civil War. He supervised the massacre of Catholic priests and peasants in Spain.

    Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee. Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army. Yakov (“Yankel”) Kreiser: general, Soviet Red Army. Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.

    David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union. Grigori Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army. Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red Army. Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army. Arseni Raskin: deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army. Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army. At least one hundred Soviet generals were Jewish (cf. Canadian Jewish News, April 19, 1989).

    Generals who were not themselves Jewish often had Jewish wives. Among these were Marshal Voroshilov, Marshal Bulganin, Marshal Peresypkin and General Pavel Sudoplatov (Sudoplatov assassinated hundreds of Christian leaders including Ukranian Catholic Archbishop Teodor Romzha). This Jewish wife “insurance policy” extended to Politburo members such as Andrei Andreyev and Leonoid Brezhnev.

    Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films which depicted Christian peasants (kulaks) as hideous, money-grabbing parasites. The kulaks were subsequently massacred. (Cf. for example Eisenstein’s Bezhin Meadow).

    KOMZET: commission for the settlement of Jewish Communists on land seized from murdered Christians in Ukraine; funded by Jewish-American financier Julius Rosenwald.

    Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda and disseminator of anti-German hate material dating from the 1930s. Ehrenburg instigated the Soviet Red Army rape and murder of German civilians. Referring to German women, Ehrenburg gloated to the advancing Red Army troops, “that blonde hag is in for a bad time.”

    In a leaflet addressed to Soviet troops, Ehrenburg wrote: “…the Germans are not human beings…nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses.” (Anatol Goldberg, Ilya Ehrenburg, p. 197). Goldberg concedes that Ehrenburg, “…had always disliked the Germans…now that there was a war on he turned his old prejudice into an asset.” (Ibid., p. 193).

    Another publication distributed to the Red Army, this time as the soldiers approached Danzig, was described by a historian: “Millions of leaflets were air-dropped on the troops with a message composed by the propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg and signed by Stalin: ‘Soldiers of the Red Army! Kill the Germans! Kill all Germans! Kill! Kill! Kill!” (Christopher Duffy, Red Storm on the Reich).

    The Soviet leadership acknowledged that Ehrenburg sought the extermination of the entire German people (cf. Pravda, April 14, 1945. [Pravda was also published in a Yiddish edition, Einikeyt). Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize. He willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem ‘Holocaust’ Museum.

    Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda. Soviet film propagandists: Mark Donsky, Leonid Lukov, Yuli Reisman, Vasily Grossman,Yevgeny Gabrilovich, Boris Volchokand Lillian Hellman (old movies written by her continue to be broadcast on American telelvision).

    Soviet propagandist: Yevgeny Khaldei who staged the photo of the raising of the hammer and sickle flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, May 2, 1945. Afterward, a special plane was waiting to fly Khaldei, Stalin’s top Tass photographer, to a Moscow lab, where his photo was further doctored (loot displayed on one of the Soviet soldier’s wrists was removed in the negative and Khaldei added clouds and smoke to the scene for dramatic effect (see photo of Khaldei and his beloved flag at left). Khaldei continued to work as a premier Soviet propagandist until his retirement from Pravda in 1972.

    His Communist propaganda is proudly on display at the Jewish Museum of New York and the Jewish Museum of San Francisco. N.Y. Times writer Vicki Goldberg exulted in the raising of the blood-drenched Soviet flag, emblem of the slaughter of millions of peasants and Christians; describing it as, “…a national (and worldwide) symbol of triumph, justice and revenge.” (Jan. 31, 1997, p. B-26).

    Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee (JAC): new form of the Bolshevik YEVKOM, Stalin’s recruiting conduit for funding money, supplies and political influence for Soviet Russia from world Jewry as well as the dissemination of gas chamber atrocity propaganda (cf. The Black Book).

    Nikolai Bukharin: Lenin’s chief theorist. Samuel Agursky: commissar. Karl Radek: member, Central Committee. Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin) commissar. A.A. Yoffe: commissar. David Ryazanov: advisor to Lenin. Lev Grigorievich Levin: physician, poisoner of Stalin’s enemies. Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev): member of the Central Committee.

    Ivan Maisky: Soviet Ambassador to Britain. Itzik Solomonovich Feffer: commissar, Soviet Secret Police. Abraham Sutskever: Soviet terrorist-partisan. Mark Osipovich Reizen: Soviet propagandist, winner of three Stalin Prizes. Lev Leopold Trepper: Soviet espionage officer.

    Bela Kun (Kohen): supreme dictator of Hungary in 1919. Kun was later Stalin’s chief terrorist in the Crimea. Kun’s eventual successor was Matyas Rakosi, Jewish Communist mass murderer of Christians in Hungary. According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency of May 14, 1997, Jews “…played key roles in ushering Communist rule into Hungary. In fact, during the brutal oppression of the early 1950s, the regime’s top five leaders were Jews. ”

    Zakharovich Mekhlis: top executioner for Stalin. Henrykas Zimanas: leader of Lithuanian communist terrorists, butcher of Christians.

    Moshe Pijade (sometimes spelled Piade): commander, Yugoslav Communist People’s Army. Tito’s top butcher of hundreds of thousands of Croatian [Yugoslav] Christians. Pijade later served as president of the Yugoslav Communist Parliament. At least eighteen generals in the Yugoslav Communist People’s Army were Jewish. The Yugoslavian communist party sent massive arms shipments to Jewish fighters in Palestine in the 1940s.

    In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Jewish communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the Politboro commander Jacob Berman (pictured at right) and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski. These men murdered or deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of Catholic Poles.

  18. Isabella May 25, 2009 @ 4:48 pm

    When are the UKRANIANS going to start filing lawsuits against the Jews who murdered the 66 MILLION in Russia? Get going now! You’re owed bigtime! Even Israel acknowledges this holocaust!

    66 Million In Russia RSS
    User ID: 270685
    7/22/2007 2:28 PM
    Report abusive post Jewish Bolsheviks Murdered 66 Million In Russia

    This is the REAL Holocaust.

    Jewish Bolsheviks Murdered 66 Million In Russia

    From Dick Fojut
    [link to]

    To Ian Punnett, Coast To Coast AM radio
    From Dick Fojut in Tucson, Arizona


    Ian, following up on a Fast Blast I sent you last Saturday during your Coast To Coast Radio program, about ANOTHER “Holocaust” not mentioned by yourself and your guest Dan Kurzman, who spoke about Hitler’s “Death Camps.” Two revealing articles follow.

    How many people did Russia’s Bolshevik Communists kill?

    * Israel’s YNET News admits: “at least 20 million.”

    – or –

    * Alexander SOLZHENITSYN states flatly: “66 million.”

    First Article…

    YNET: At Least 20 Million Killed By Jewish Bolsheviks…

    Following is a surprising article from respected news source YNET in Israel, about the Jewish-Bolshevik conquest of Russia after 1917… (unlikely to ever be reprinted or reported by America’s major print, TV or radio “news” media.)

    STALIN’S JEWS – Opinion from Israel, Ynetnews

    12-21-6 Excerpts only…

    “We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.

    We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

    Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, “opposition members” who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

    And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the ‘bloodthirsty dwarf’.”

    [link to]


    SOLZHENITSYN: 66 Million Murdered By Jewish Bolsheviks…

    Henry Makow PhD (an anti-Zionist Canadian Jew), in his “Red Symphony” essay (see Makow’s website archives) claims that from the behind the scenes, the ROTHSCHILD BANKING CARTEL financed and controlled the BOLSHEVIKS who took over Russia.

    If one wants to know the extent of the STATE TERROR and HORROR inflicted upon people in Russia since 1917 AFTER the JEWISH BOLSHEVIKS of Lenin (and his Party competitor) Trotsky, took TOTAL power, read the following informative short article by TEXE MARRS (not related to Jim Marrs) about historian Solzhenitsyn’s latest book (banned in the West), “Together for Two Hundred Years.”

    Solzhenitsyn: The “Conscience of the 20th Century”

    TEXE MARRS at:

    If not exaggerated, Solzhenitsyn asserts that since 1917, the Bolsheviks, continuing under assassin Stalin, through and even after WW2, systematically executed, and inside (and outside) their thousands of Gulags, worked, starved and froze to death, SIXTY-SIX million people, not all, but most of them CHRISTIANS (whom the Bolsheviks hated). This mass death was THE LARGEST REAL “HOLOCAUST” in modern history – but totally unknown today by most Americans, British and western Europeans and absent from our school books. Of course no publisher in the Western world dares reprint Solzhenitsyn’s book in English.

  19. Shabibble May 25, 2009 @ 5:02 pm

    Two wrongs don’t make a right, you HYPOCRITICAL JEWS!

  20. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 5:29 pm

    According to Jewish researcher John Sack, “In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security…the chief of the Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were Jews.” Sack reports that 75% of the officers of the Communist Secret Police in Silesia were Jews.

    He noted that many Jews in the Communist terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones like General Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John Sack, The New Republic, Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6. Sack in this article also refutes some shoddy research performed by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of Hitler’s Willing Executioners, who, in the double standard typical of the Jewish mentality, refuses to accept the proven fact that Jews ran the Polish Communist secret police even as Goldhagen asserts the racist myth that the entire German nation was guilty of genocide. Sack does a good job of proving Goldhagen wrong about Poland).

    In Poland, “…a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930, at its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee.

    Communism appealed to some Jews because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than any other Polish party…Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years immediately after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in the hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Semitism.” (Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16).

    Of course when one encounters the issue of Judaics, Communists and Catholics in Poland in the Establishment media or universities today, the mass murder of the Polish Catholics at the hands of the Jewish Communists, is never raised. Instead, a minor attack on Jews by Polish peasants enraged at the role of Jews in Communist terror, which occurred in July, 1946 at Kielce and which has come to be called the “Kielce pogrom” will be the centerpiece of the “discussion. ” The motivation for the attack is not usually mentioned.

    Rather, the Catholic peasantry are painted in terms of “fiendish bigots” whose “blind, irrational hate” for the “poor, persecuted Jews” resulted in “yet another martyrdom of God’s Chosen.”

    But the Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal Hlond, a brave prelate in a stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to Jewish tyranny in Poland, so different from the traitorous philo-Judaism of the current Pontiff, stated that the attack in Kielce occurred because of resentment ‘due to the Jews who today occupy leading positions in Poland’s (Communist) government and endeavor to introduce a governmental structure that the majority of Poles do not wish to have.” (Ibid., Kirshner).

    As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observes, “The average Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country–Berman and Minc–were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official Rozanski.” (N.Y. Review of Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).

    With this record it is interesting to note that the Polish occupant of the papacy, John Paul II, consistently lent his prestige and his presence to canonizations and commemorations of politically correct victims of the Nazis.

    Nowhere did this Pope breath a word about the openly Jewish, Communist massacres of Polish Catholics, Spanish Catholics, Croatian Catholics, Lithuanian Catholics–he was too busy, intoning the Shoah, referring to the heirs of the Pharisees as “our Elder Brothers in the Faith” giving official recognition to an Israeli state which even many orthodox, Haredi rabbis regard as a blasphemous and abominable entity, and attacking the German people as “the image of the beast.”

    Solomon Morel (pictured at left): commandant of a post-war Communist concentration camp for Germans in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Jews in charge of such camps. Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans, sometimes with his bare hands (cf. “The Wrath of Solomon,” Village Voice, March 30, 1993 and John Sack, An Eye for an Eye). Morel is comfortably esconsed in Tel Aviv.

    German survivors of Morel’s camp have demanded he be tried as a war criminal, but for the Establishment media and the phony, partisan, “human rights” groups, bringing Morel to justice is simply a non-issue. After all, he murdered helpless Germans, so what’s the problem?

    Julius Hammer, M.D.: New York abortionist and co-founder of the American communist party. Armand Hammer: fundraiser and financier for Lenin and Stalin, son of Julius. “The Communist Party was also the most Jewish party in America. At least nineteen percent of the Young Communist League were Jews and never less than forty percent of its leadership.” (Source: “Pakn Treger: From Yiddish Roots to the Frontiers of Jewish Culture,” Fall 1997, p. 18).

    Lev Davidovich Landau: Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic bomb. Klaus Fuchs: helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Ruth Werner: colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg: stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin. Morris Cohen (Peter Kroger): assisted the Rosenbergs. Markus Wolf: chief of German Communist Stasi Secret Police.

    Howard Fast: American communist propagandist for Stalin. David Dubinsky: Stalin’s ally, head of the U.S. International Ladies Garment Workers Union. Nahum Goldmann: founder, World Jewish Congress, communist propagandist. Rabbi Moses Rosen: agent, Romanian communist party. Victor Rothschild: top British espionage agent for Stalin.

    Mark Zborowski: “…considered by historians of Soviet terror operations to have been the most fearsome…(Soviet) spy of all time” (Stephen Schwartz, Forward, Jan. 26, 1996). Zborowski, a medical researcher, murdered a dissident with a poisoned orange at the Soviet-run hospital in Paris. Zborowski was implicated in several other assassinations in 1936 and 1937.

    In the 1940s worked for both the American Jewish Committee and the KGB. In the 1960s Zborowski worked as a medical researcher at Mount Zion Hospital in San Francisco. He trained numerous psychiatrists and medical specialists in the Bay Area. He died in 1990 (cf. “The Strange Case of Doctor Zborowski and Monsieur Etienne” by Philippe Videlier, in Le Monde Diplomatique, Dec. 1992).

    From 1936-1939, when Stalin’s “International Brigade” forces were dispatched to Spain to fight the Catholics, Jewish Communists comprised the largest faction of his troops, “More than 40,000 volunteers fought in the International Brigade…A huge number of the volunteers were Jews: between 7,000 and 10,000 of the Internationals as a whole, more than one-third of the Americans.”

    Jewish Communist Milton Wolff was the last commander of the American contingent. Rabbi Hyman Katz joined in order to fight Spanish Christians. (cf. Jeffrey Sharlet, “Troublemakers,” Pakn Treger, Fall, 1997, pp. 16, 18 and 24).

    The Communists slaughtered 6,549 Spanish priests, 283 helpless nuns and 13 bishops. “In Ciudad Real in the center of Spain, the bishop and every single priest of the diocese were murdered; not one escaped.” –Dr. Warren H. Carroll, 70 Years of the Communist Revolution, pp. 184-185, 188-189. (Also cf. Justo Perez de Urbel, Catholic Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War [Kansas City, Missouri: The Angelus Press, 1993).

    Stalin’s propaganda agent in Spain was New Yorker Leon Rosenthal.

    On Oct. 16, 1948, 50,000 Jewish communists turned out in Moscow’s Red Square to welcome the first Israeli delegation to Moscow. Stalin supported Zionism’s 1947 Palestine partition plan, gave crucial recognition to the newly-created state of Israel and voted for Israel’s admission to the United Nations.

    In 1951 communist and Marxist parties had twenty-three seats in the Israeli Knesset. The kibbutz system was the most powerful movement in the country and the most powerful kibbutz leaders were nearly all Marxists. The biggest Israeli holiday was May Day, celebrated with rallies, marches, red banners and red songs.

    As recently as 1987 the Israelis were providing the KGB with American intelligence secrets (cf. UPI dispatch by Richard Sale, Dec. 13, 1987 and The City Paper [Washington, DC], Jan. 15, 1988). Jonathan Jay Pollard was part of one such spy ring. British traitor and Communist spy Kim Philby was assisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad (cf. Sunday Telegraph [England], April 16, 1989). This was most appropriate since Philby’s KGB handler in Moscow was also Jewish.

    Romania’s communist regime received favorable trade deals from the U.S. for years due to Israeli pressure on Congress in its behalf (N.Y. Times, Jan. 18, 1992, p. 23). The notion that the Zionist Jewish movement was anti-communist is a fallacy.

    The truth is more complex. There was a left wing and a right wing within Zionism. The rightists, like the terrorists Jabotinsky and Stern, took a fascist approach. Leftist Zionists like David “I am a Bolshevik” Ben-Gurion admired the Soviet model of Jewish power and sought to incorporate it as the political economy of the Israeli state.

    “National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).

    The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, “one of its foremost intellectuals”( London Sunday Times, Aug. 29, 1993) and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo).

    Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC’s terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. (“Joe Slovo,” Jewish Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).

    Slovo had been the ” planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others… Slovo, who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday…Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the human cost, whatever the bloodshed…Slovo disputes little of his image as ‘the Communist mastermind’ behind the ANC’s armed struggle.

    For him the fears of South Africa’s whites are both a measure of the ANC’s growing strength and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its ultimate victory. ‘Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading position,’ Slovo said.” (“Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid,” L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela’s ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was named Minister of Housing.

  21. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 5:47 pm

    “Nelson Mandela and Joe Slovo give the clenched fist salute in front of the blood-drenched Hammer and Sickle flag of Bolshevism. Slovo, a Yiddish-speaking Lithuanian ‘Jew,’ was Secretary General of the South African Communist Party and director of the military wing of the ANC, which perpetrated numerous terror bombings against white civilians.” [see website for photo.]

    When we look at these gruesome personalities, who are only the tip of the Jewish iceberg that was Soviet Communism and who were responsible for the deaths of upwards of thirty million people; when we realize how little is written or filmed about their crimes, we begin to realize that the exclusive focus on the crimes of the Germans, real and imagined, is a function of propaganda.

    If the facts about the Jewish Communist holocaust against the peasants and Christians of Russia and Eastern Europe were given massive publicity, the supposed “special evil” of the Germans would stand exposed as a racist fraud
    German actions during World War Two must be viewed in a vacuum in order for the New World Order to advance its covert objective of Jewish supremacy.

    When Nazi actions are placed within the context of Jewish Communism’s abominable crimes against the Christian people of Russia and Eastern Europe, the public will begin to understand that Hitler and the Nazis were a reaction, however unbalanced and excessive, to the Jewish Communist genocide against millions of Christians and peasants in the East.

    This is why the crucial facts about Jewish Communism must never be documented in Hollywood films, discussed in university courses or pictured in contemporary news magazines. This is why Malcolm Muggeridge’s book, an eyewitness account of the Jewish Communist holocaust against Christians, Winter in Moscow, has been tightly suppressed.

    In the Sunday Telegraph (London, England: Nov. 18, 1990) the question is asked, “Why then has it (Winter in Moscow) never been republished? The answer may lie in Muggeridge’s handling of what was then called the ‘Jewish question.’…Winter in Moscow is acutely concerned with Jews…It was of course the case that a very disproportionate number of the early Bolsheviks were Jews and thus of commissars and apparatchiki…”

    Our documentation of these forbidden facts constitutes the chief motivation for the suppression attempts of such Stalinist censorship groups as the A.D.L. and Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both of these organizations would, if they could, have this writer jailed for publishing the documentation herein in Germany, France, or Austria. They regularly supply “intelligence files” to those governments on pro-Christian and pro-German writers.

    In 1995 the ADL sought to assist the prosecution of 69 year old American writer Hans Schmidt who was imprisoned in Germany for publishing a newsletter in Florida. These Judaic censors would like to have similar laws passed worldwide, resulting in the jailing of more writers and researchers who will not toe the party line or worship the Golden Calf.

    To give the other side of history, the revisionist side–to give voice to the voiceless millions of dead victims of Judaic Communism–is regarded as “hateful” by the vain Zionists who demand for themselves the right to vomit forth a daily barrage of sewage upon the sacred memory of our grandparents and ancestors. To defend against the dishonoring of our heritage and our ancestors, is surely not hate; it is the right of self-defense against psychological warfare.

    Copyright©2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II. All Rights Reserved

  22. Isabella May 25, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

    It is a Christian DUTY to start documenting and talking about the Jewish Bolshevisk holocaust against the Ukranians and Russians which claimed the lives of 66 million.

    This should be continued by the Russian Orthodox Church, and the Orthodox Church in general and all Christian Churches..then it should be introduced as standard history in public school textbooks in America and Russa. Then there should be talks in public libraries, universities and cultural centers to bring light to this important issue.

    There should be letters to the editor, news articles, community plays, demonstrations, and in other vehicles, to educate about the horror and evils of the Jewish Bolshevisks concerning the damage they did to Slavic lands.

    As the information disseminates into the populations, appropriate research identifying the descendants of Jewish Bolshevisks should be targeted for litigation for reparations to the children of the victims living around the world today. This will continue for the next 100 years.

    Finally, there will be a memorial built in Washington, DC and a comparable one in Moscow to honor these dead.

    There will be annual dedications at these memorials, lit by an eternal flame, reading each name of the 66 million who perished at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevisks, both in Washington and Moscow. Any Jew who contests this actual number will be imprisoned for anti-Christianism. Any Jew who denies the Jewish Bolshevisk holocaust will be branded a “holocaust denier” and will face prison.

    The President of the state of Israel will attend these annual dedications. Israel will be required to denounce Karl Marx and Max Engels publicly and teach about the Jewish reign of terror during the Bolshevisk revolution in its public school systems. The President of Israel will apologize profusely every year during ceremonies at these twin memorials for the Jewish murder of these innocents and promise to the world that Jewish communism will never surface again. Never again.

  23. Isabella May 25, 2009 @ 7:58 pm

    Fred (not Max)

    Russia Is The Start Of Jewish World Domination

    The original Jews were Sephardics, out of the Middle East, who went to Spain and Portugal as members of the Islamic empire when the Moors occupied the Iberian Peninsula.

    However, almost all Jews today are not descendants of the Sephardics, but originate from a band of ruthless Mongolian tribes called the Khazars. The Sephardics, in search of army for their revolution , chose the Khazars. The Khazars were converted to Judaism, and today they make up 95% of the world’s Jewish population.

    Military geniuses, such as Kublai Khan, Genghis Khan, and Attila the Hun, always hired Khazars as mercenaries. At the peak of Russia’s empire she kept the Khazars confined to the ‘Pale of the Settlement’ (Ukraine).

    The Sephadics used the Eastern European Khazars as a starting point for their plans of world domination. Their first move towards that goal, was to take control of Russia by overthrowing the Czar.

    Marx and Engels

    Two German Jews who wrote the Communist Manifesto.

    Russia consisted of nobles and landless peasants, and was ripe for revolution. In 1861, Czar Alexander II started land reforms, but Jewish nihilists were on the move. Russians had dealt with them for centuries, and had restricted them to the Pale of Settlement (Ukraine).

    The Zionist Jewish banking elite had inserted Jewish revolutionaries into Russia, where they began indoctrinating the peasantry with Marxist ideology.

    World War One Was Started to Get Russia to Fall to Communism

    The Zionist Jewish elite started World War One by pitting Serbia against Germany, and having Russia align with Serbia. The war resulted in food shortages, famine, and discontent, which combine to create ideal breeding grounds for revolution.

    Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) and Vladimir Lenin started the revolution.

    Trotsky Is Brought To New York

    Jacob Schiff, the American chairman of the Kuhn & Loeb bank, was the financier of the Bolshevik revolution. He brought Trotsky to New York in February 1916.

    Trotsky recruited expatriate young Russian Jews from New York’s large Russian Jewish immigrant population, and trained them as revolutionaries

    In 1917, Rothschild directs Lenin to replace Kerensky. Lenin, joined by Trotsky and 300 Jews from New York, depose Kerensky.

    Kerensky Steps Down

    In 1917, Rothschild directs Lenin to replace Kerensky.
    Lenin, joined by Trotsky and 300 Jews from New York, depose Kerensky.

    Jacob Yurovsky…. Jewish commander, Soviet Secret Police.

    He was appointed Deputy Regional Commissar of Justice, as well as Regional Cheka head.

    In July, Sverdlov appointed Yurovsk to be Commandant of the Ipatiev House. Yurovsky was absolutely ruthless.

    Russian Soldiers Siding With Czar
    On July 4, 1918, Yurovsky, under orders from Moscow, dismissed all the Russian soldiers, except Pavel Medvedev, a Cheka Jewish spy. He replaced the inside and outside of the prison house with foreign revolutionaries serving as guards.

    Yurovsky Brings In Jewish Assassins

    They were Jews from Hungary, as their scribbling on the walls indicated.

    A Cheka (secret police) unit replaced the military guard over the Royal family to do the execution. In the Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents.

    Romanovs – Two Weeks Of Cheka Jewish Guards

    The final two weeks were miserable due to to Cheka depravity. Alexei, and the girls, had no privacy as the guards accompanied them in the lavatory. It was a period of humiliations, abuse, and even rape by the Bolshevik guards.

    Romanovs’ Remains Exhumed

    In 1989, an anthropology team, working from photographs and the written report of Jacob Yurovsky, located the grave. Under the supervision of .Dr Maples, almost 1,000 bone fragments were assembled into five female and four male skeletons

    Battered Skulls

    The American forensic team, led by Maples, and later supported by Falsetti, analyzed teeth and bone, and concluded that the missing female was 17-year-old Anastasia. The Americans were astonished at the brutality of the crime.

    Since then, controversy has raged over the results of DNA testing and the positive identification of the remains. Subsequent DNA testing by an English team has confirmed that the nine bodies found are those of the Czar and most of his family and attendants.

    The missing bodies were of Alexei and one of the Grand Duchesses, probably Marie.

  24. Citizen May 25, 2009 @ 9:42 pm

    The scum of the earth have to have their pound of what they think is justice. 89 years old, the efen bastards..

  25. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 9:54 pm

    Dear joeglas, please notice that this is from a Hungarian source.

    “Kingdom of Yugoslavia
    Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovens

    During WWI, in 1916 the Serbian Parliament in exile decided the creation of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia at a meeting inside the Municipal Theatre of Corfu. The kingdom was formed on 1 December 1918 under the name “Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes”
    Formed after World War I, new state was odd mixture of cultures and nationalities, constant political turmoil reflected on the military which attempted to integrated former Austro-Hungarian officers with its former enemies in Serbian and Montenegrin army only to be swept away in just few days of Blitzkrieg.

    Revolutionary opposition to the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes – established in 1919 at the Paris Peace Conference, was not organized at first by the dissatisfied nationalities crowded uncomfortably into that heterogeneous state.

    Terrorism was launched by the Communist Party. In the early 20’s, the nationalities resenting Serbian domination had not yet given up the hope that through constitutional processes and a continued struggle in the Belgrade Parliament, they might achieve an acceptable degree of autonomy within a Yugoslav confederation.

    Similarly, the main revolutionary force of our era, the Communist movement, was not directed in the early 20’s against the unity of Yugoslavia. Politically, the Communist Party was opposing the forceful rule of King Alexander I, mainly because he was a dedicated anti-Communist.

    In December, 1920, while still Regent, he had ordered the Communist Party dissolved. Prompted by the traditional sympathies of the Serbs for “Mother Russia,” [in the throes of the Bolshevik Revolution] the Communist Party had succeeded after the first World War in obtaining some popular backing, mainly among the Serbs, but was forced after its dissolution, to go underground.

    There, in complete secrecy, a militant conspiracy sprang into being, its members, mainly young fanatics, who aptly called their association “The Red Terror.”

    A few months after the dissolution of the Party by the King, the first attempt against his life was carried out by this group in retaliation. The perpetrator of the crime, Spasoje Stejitch, whose bomb narrowly missed the King’s car, was sentenced to prison for life.

    In 1941, when Yugoslavia collapsed, he was released, to his misfortune, for his comrades declared him unsound of mind and unceremoniously liquidated him. Another youthful member of Red Terror: Alija Aliagitch, proved more efficient in terrorism but equally unfortunate. He was hanged (1921) for having murdered Milorad Draskovitch, the Minister who had strictly enforced the order to disband the Communist Party.

    Communist theory does not admit, in general, individual acts of terrorism, for such methods are apt to provoke violent retribution against the Party. But there are exceptions to this rule, as may be gathered from an article in the March 7, 1959 issue of Politika, published in Belgrade, which glorified the almost forgotten crimes of Red Terror as having been indispensable at that time in view of the “opportunistic attitude” of the leaders of the Yugoslav Communist Party. “Red Terror,” wrote the paper, “was the organization of young intellectuals and workers who remained true to the aims of the proletariat and were fighting for socialism without compromise.”

    The leaders of the Communist Party in the early 20’s, of whom this paper disapproved, were exclusively Serbs headed by a real liberal, Professor Sima Markovitch, Secretary of the Central Committee. This type of leadership appealed, however, to only a limited circle in the violently realistic Balkans.

    In capitalist societies, communism automatically tends in a direction opposite to the existing order, not only in its aims, but also in its methods, and particularly in its spirit. This is how the incredible, nevertheless, happened: in the land of the Serbs the genuine homegrown Communist movement was imbued with a humanistic spirit, in reaction against the unmerciful mood of the Serbs. The sophisticated Professor Markovitch unable to combine Marxism with Christian precepts, had embraced Hindu philosophy.

    He abhorred all bloodshed; replaced class warfare with a theory of peaceful elimination of tensions, as heralded by the inspired Hindu poet, Rabindranath Tagore. An indignant young painter, the Communist Moshe Pijade, branded the hyper – civilized professor, “an Anarchist.” Pijade’s Marxist realism, brought him in later years a high position in Tito’s hierarchy.

    Humanism, the guiding principle of Serbian communism! What deviation from Lenin and Stalin! Writing under the pseudonym of Themistokies Papasissis, an author, who had access to secret German files, describes1 how at the Fourth World Congress of the Komintern, the Leftist faction of the Yugoslav Party was helped into power against Professor Markovitch by the Moscow Bolsheviks.

    Swayed by a wealthy Belgrade lawyer, the renegade Trisha Kaclerovitch, the Yugoslav Party accepted the new goals set by Moscow, not only to eliminate King Alexander, but also to disintegrate the Yugoslav multi-national state.

    A resolution passed in 1924, at the Fifth Congress of the Komintern declared that “the principle of self-determination of the people, accepted by the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, shall find its realization in the separation of Croatia, Slovenia and Macedonia from Yugoslavia, and in their transformation into completely independent republics.”

    Professor Markovitch deplored the catastrophic consequences which that decision would have for the future of the Yugoslav Communist Party, composed mainly of Serbian members. He foresaw their desertion and understood that the Serbs, even if communists like himself, would remain patriots, and would try to serve the cause of their own people, however defectively it might be conceived.

    Previous to this decision, the Independent Labor Unions of Yugoslavia, strongly influenced by the Communists, had some 30,000 registered members – this figure was shortly reduced to 2,000. Stalin had received his first, but by no means his last, lesson in independent Yugoslav communism.

    The decay of the Yugoslav Party was put repeatedly on the agenda of the Komintern. A Special Committee, delegated to deal with the annoying Serb situation, was headed by no lesser man than Stalin himself. At a meeting on March 30, 1925, in Moscow, he assailed harshly the humanitarian Professor Markovitch for his refusal to yield to leftist demands.

    The Communist Party, however, could not be revitalized, not even under Stalin’s prodding, so, finally, in May, 1928, the Komintern’s Executive Committee published a letter addressed to the Yugoslav Party, demanding that the discredited intellectuals who formed the leadership at that time be replaced by solid proletarians.

    A former factory worker, Djura Djakovitch, was smuggled from Moscow to Belgrade to carry out the reorganization of the Party. But the situation of the Yugoslav Party had become so precarious by then, that the Congress could not be convoked in Yugoslavia, but was summoned finally to Dresden, Germany.

    In October, 1928, the Dresden Congress brought to an inglorious end home – grown Serb communism. The Party could not be resuscitated on Muscovite lines for the Kominform had lost the confidence of the Serbian element. The handful of Yugoslav communists, fortunate to reach Dresden, were greeted there by Stalin’s able emissary, Professor Ercole Ercoli [Palmiro TogIiatti, the leader of the Italian Communist Party, who was hiding behind this alias] who provided guidance for the Congress, broke the resistance of the dejected Professor Markovitch, and forced him to exercise self – criticism.

    Thereafter, the kindly professor was lured to Moscow, where as a useless’ humanitarian, he was unmercifully liquidated.

    Shortly thereafter, (in the beginning of January ’29) King Alexander proclaimed his personal dictatorship of Yugoslavia. The new Secretary of the Communist Party’s Central Committee, the fiery Montenegrin, Jovan Malishitch, launched desperate appeals to incite the people to start a revolution against the king, but his pleas, as far as the Communist Party was concerned, fell on deaf ears.

    Soon Malishitch and his Central Committee had to take refuge abroad, while the bold Djakovitch, loyal to the communist cause to the bitter end, was shot by the police. The party organization, reduced to a skeleton, was ruthlessly stamped out together with its secret ramifications.

    By 1932, the Party membership, which in 1920 amounted to 60,000, had diminished to something around 200. Defeat in the Second World War and Tito, a talented non – Serbian leader, were needed – and, of course, considerable Allied aid – to make communism in Yugoslavia supreme. But Stalin had to experience again the fact that a self – respecting nation, even if subjected to Communism, will live its own life and imbue the Marxist gospel with its own national spirit.

  26. NotAnObot May 25, 2009 @ 10:19 pm

    The Germans kept very precise records. I would be looking for records that proved he was a POW.

  27. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 11:07 pm

    Initiated in 1918, Red Terror was a state policy of the Bolshevik government to suppress, intimidate, or liquidate real or potential adversaries of the regime. It started on September 5, when the survival of the Bolshevik regime was threatened by foreign and domestic foes. Individual guilt did not matter; belonging to a suspect social class did. It was, in other words, a class-based approach not to justice but to settling accounts with potential enemies.

    Its first victims were former tsarist officers, policemen, aristocracy, opposition parties’ leaders, and property owners who had enjoyed privileges under the old regime. In 1918 about fifteen thousand were executed. In 1919, other social groups were targeted: former landlords, entrepreneurs, and Cossacks, attacked for their suspected anti-Bolshevik attitudes.

    In 1920 the policy was extended to peasants in rebellious provinces, along with thousands of captured White Russian officers and their families. White Russians were the counterrevolutionaries; the color white was a symbol of the old order and the color red was a symbol of revolution and communism.

    Red Terror was carried out by a new institution, called the Cheka (an abbreviation of the Russian for “extraordinary commission”).

    The Cheka was a state institution, subordinate only to the Communist Party Central Committee. It was a political police force that did not enforce the law but instead administered systematic terror arbitrarily. Local Chekas, especially in the Ukraine, were notorious for their cruelty, and for mass executions carried out in the summer of 1919. It was a party instrument for the conduct of legalized lawlessness. Settling of accounts and personal gain were often motives for denunciation.

    New concepts entered the lexicon, among them “enemies of the people,” “hidden enemies,” and “suspect social origin.” The long term consequence of Red Terror was a disregard for individual guilt or innocence, the institutionalization of a class-based approach to justice, the designation of “suspect social groups,” fear and intimidation of entire population and, subsequently, an even greater wave of state-sponsored terror under Josef Vissarionovich Stalin.

    Purpose of the Soviet Red Terror

    The Red Terror was claimed to be introduced in reply to [so-called] White Terror. The stated purpose of this campaign was struggle with counter-revolutionaries considered to be enemies of the people. Many Russian communists openly proclaimed that Red Terror was needed for extermination of entire social groups or former “ruling classes”. Lenin planned the terror in advance. In 1908 he had written of “real, nation-wide terror, which reinvigorates the country”.[7] Communist leader Grigory Zionviev seemed [sic] to be advocating genocide when he declared in mid-September of 1918:

    “To overcome of our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.”[8]

    For many people the major evidence of their guilt was their social status rather than actual deeds. Martin Latsis, chief of the Ukrainian Cheka, explained in newspaper “Red Terror”:

    “Do not look in the file of incriminating evidence to see whether or not the accused rose up against the Soviets with arms or words. Ask him instead to which class he belongs, what is his background, his education, his profession. These are the questions that will determine the fate of the accused. That is the meaning and essence of the Red Terror.”


    The campaign of mass repressions was officially initiated as retribution for the assassination of Petrograd Cheka leader Moisei Uritsky [Jew], and attempted assassination of Vladimir Lenin by Fanya Kaplan [J] on August 30, 1918. While recovering from his wounds, Lenin instructed: “It is necessary – secretly and urgently to prepare the terror” [10].

    Even before the assassinations, Lenin was sending telegrams “to introduce mass terror” in Nizhny Novogorod in response to a suspected civilian uprising there, and “crush” landowners in Penza who protested, sometimes violently, to requisition of their grain by military detachments:[2]

    “Comrades!… You must make example of these people. (1) Hang (I mean hang publicly, so that people see it) at least 100 kulaks, rich bastards, and known bloodsuckers. (2) Publish their names. (3) Seize all their grain. (4) Single out the hostages per my instructions in yesterday’s telegram.”

    Five hundred “representatives of overthrown classes” were executed immediately by the Bolshevik communist government after the assassination of Uritsky [3]. The first official announcement of Red Terror, published in Izvestiya, “Appeal to the Working Class” on September 3, 1918 called for the workers to “crush the hydra of counterrevolution with massive terror! … anyone who dares to spread the slightest rumor against the Soviet regime will be arrested immediately and sent to concentration camp” [2] .

    This was followed by the decree “On Red Terror”, issued September 5, 1918 by the Cheka. On 15 October, checkist Gleb Bokiy, summing up the officially ended Red Terror, reported that in Petrograd 800 alleged enemies had been shot and another 6,229 imprisoned.[10] Casualties in the first two months were between 10,000 and 15,000 based on lists of summarily executed people published in newspaper “Cheka Weekly” and other official press.

  28. KathJuliane May 25, 2009 @ 11:18 pm

    Repressions against peasants

    The Internal Troops of Cheka and the Red Army practiced the terror tactics of taking and executing numerous hostages, often in connection with desertions of forcefully mobilized peasants.

    It is believed that more than 3 million deserters escaped from the Red Army in 1919 and 1920. Around 500,000 deserters were arrested in 1919 and close to 800,000 in 1920 by Cheka troops and special divisions created to combat desertions.[2] Thousands of deserters were killed, and their families were often taken hostage.

    According to Lenin’s instructions,
    “After the expiration of the seven-day deadline for deserters to turn themselves in, punishment must be increased for these incorrigible traitors to the cause of the people. Families and anyone found to be assisting them in any way whatsoever are to be considered as hostages and treated accordingly.”[2]

    In September 1918, only in twelve provinces of Russia, 48,735 deserters and 7,325 bandits were arrested, 1,826 were killed and 2,230 were executed. A typical report from a Cheka department stated:

    “Yaroslavl Province, 23 June 1919. The uprising of deserters in the Petropavlovskaya volost has been put down. The families of the deserters have been taken as hostages. When we started to shoot one person from each family, the Greens began to come out of the woods and surrender. Thirty-four deserters were shot as an example”.[2]

    During the suppression of the Tambov Rebellion, estimates suggest that around 100,000 peasant rebels and their families were imprisoned or deported and perhaps 15,000 executed.[11] [Then to perish in exile.]

    This campaign marked the beginning of the Gulag, and some scholars have estimated that 70,000 were imprisoned by September, 1921. Conditions in these camps led to high mortality rates, and there were “repeated massacres.” The Cheka at the Kholmogory camp adopted the practice of drowning bound prisoners in the nearby Dvina river.[12]

    Occasionally, entire prisons were “emptied” of inmates via mass shootings prior to abandoning a town to White forces.[13][14]

    Repressions against Russian industrial workers

    On 16 March 1919, Cheka stormed the Putilov factory. More than 900 workers who went to a strike were arrested. More than 200 of them were executed without trial during the next few days. Numerous strikes took place in the spring of 1919 in cities of Tula, Orel, Tver, Ivanovo, and Astrakhan. The starving workers sought to obtain food rations matching those of Red Army soldiers. They also demanded the elimination of privileges for Communists, freedom of press, and free elections. All strikes were mercilessly suppressed by Cheka using arrests and executions.[15]

    In the city of Astrakhan, the strikers and Red Army soldiers who joined them were loaded onto barges and then thrown by the hundreds into the Volga with stones around their necks. Between 2,000 and 4,000 were shot or drowned from 12 to 14 of March 1919. In addition, the repression also claimed the lives of some 600 to 1,000 bourgeoisie. Recently published archival documents indicate this was the largest massacre of workers by the Bolsheviks before the suppression of the Kronstadt rebellion.[16]

    However, strikes continued. On January 1920, Lenin sent a telegram to a city of Izhvek telling that “I am surprised that … you are not immediately executing large numbers of strikers for the crime of sabotage.”[17] On 6 June 1920, female workers in Tula who refused to work on Sunday were arrested and sent to labor camps. The refusal to work during the weekend was claimed to be a “counter-revolutionary conspiracy formented by Polish spies”. The strikes were eventually stopped after a series of arrests, executions, and the taking of hostages.

    Atrocities of the Red Terror

    At these times, there were numerous reports that Cheka interrogators employed tortures of “scarcely believable barbarity”.

    Allegedly, people were tied to planks and slowly fed into furnaces; the skin was peeled off victims’ hands to produce “gloves”; naked people were rolled around in barrels studded with nails; “in Kiev, cages of rats were fixed to prisoners’ bodies and heated until the rats gnawed their way into the victims’ intestines.”[18]

  29. Jason May 26, 2009 @ 12:17 am

    Even if Mr. Demjanjuk was a guard — which is questionable — he’s already spent 7 years in an Israeli prison – 5 under a death sentence!

    German ”death camp” guards are no longer even prosecuted…..

  30. Hoff May 26, 2009 @ 1:04 am

    Blood Passover – The jews of Europe and Ritual Murder by Ariel Toaff – full text in english.

  31. Stav May 26, 2009 @ 2:03 am


    The matter is doctrinal in nature, it is not possible to escape this fact. Arbitrary changes were made to things decided in ecumenical councils by the RCC.

    I’ll let KathJuliane answer you historically specific questions.

    As far as deposing and chastising the Corinthians goes, I don’t see any reason why this is in anyway contradicting to what I said.


  32. Stav May 26, 2009 @ 2:26 am

    Hi all,

    The next thing we are going to see in this case, is a hunt for the destruction of Pat Buchanan, as the line was “crossed” several times.

    I would not be surprised if anything happens, even if it does not have a direct connection to the Zionist Jews. They like to work under the scenes after all, especially when they deliver their own “judgments”.

    Br. Nathanael, keep informing the world of these satanic acts!

    On a different note, while Greece is now a pretty free country, I fear things may change here too, when the Zionist controlled socialist party gets into power, which is what seems,will be the case. This also seems to have been something a long time coming. Let’s see what happens…


  33. Hoff May 26, 2009 @ 2:36 am

    Blood Passover – The jews of Europe and Ritual Murder by Ariel Toaff – full text in english and on one page.

    Space bar = Page down. Shift + space bar = Page up.

  34. Hoff May 26, 2009 @ 3:12 am

    ”SCORES OF CHILDREN’S BOOKS PUBLISHED IN ISRAEL encourage hatred and contempt for the Arabs.”

    lt’s not only for small children, the global jew mafia do it to big children too. Just watch ZNN- Zionist NonsenseNetwork, Faux News, ABC, CBN and whatnot abbreviation, they all spew HATE ARABS propaganda.


  35. Michael K. May 26, 2009 @ 4:22 am

    Dear RZN Christians,

    In reference to the above article concerning the ‘Holocaust’ ™ prosecution of an alleged Nazi Guard:

    I have found information posted at the anti-Zionist website

    regarding the post war use of the formerly Nazi run concentration camps to persecute and murder vast numbers of GERMAN NATIONALS.

    This contentious claim, this wild accusation, where does it originate?

    Taking the link provided on the website, titled “Zio-Mammonism” takes one to an audio recording of Texe Marrs, notable Christian researcher. Listening to it, we hear a reference to a little known book called “An Eye For An Eye.” This book was written by an honest ‘Jew-by race’ named John Sack. See it here:

    The essential claim is that the Communists, with the knowledge of the Allies, set Jews up with positions as guards in the captured concentration camp facilities, with a new mission: extract confessions and get revenge.

    Statistics appear to support the argument that around 4-5 million Germans died sometime between the end of ‘hostilities’, and the first comprehensive census in the early 1950’s.

    My own lineage of Sudetan Germans appears to be “extinct.” In fact the Sudetanland was turned for a time into a no-man’s-land, a DMZ separating the Communist bloc from the west. What happened to those people? Perhaps this book provides some clues.

  36. jgalindes May 26, 2009 @ 5:41 am

    Hi Hoff,

    Looks good reading on a sad issue.



  37. Isabella May 26, 2009 @ 10:14 am

    May 25, 2009 @ 7:21 pm
    It is a Christian DUTY to start documenting and talking about the Jewish Bolshevisk holocaust against the Ukranians and Russians which claimed the lives of 66 million.

    This should be continued by the Russian Orthodox Church, and the Orthodox Church in general and all Christian Churches..then it should be introduced as standard history in public school textbooks in America and Russa. Then there should be talks in public libraries, universities and cultural centers to bring light to this important issue.

    There should be letters to the editor, news articles, community plays, demonstrations, and in other vehicles, to educate about the horror and evils of the Jewish Bolshevisks concerning the damage they did to Slavic lands.

    As the information disseminates into the populations, appropriate research identifying the descendants of Jewish Bolshevisks should be targeted for litigation for reparations to the children of the victims living around the world today. This will continue for the next 100 years.

    Finally, there will be a memorial built in Washington, DC and a comparable one in Moscow to honor these dead.

    There will be annual dedications at these memorials, lit by an eternal flame, reading each name of the 66 million who perished at the hands of the Jewish Bolshevisks, both in Washington and Moscow. Any Jew who contests this actual number will be imprisoned for anti-Christianism. (SAME WAY THE JEWS HANDLE THEIR HOLOCAUST) Any Jew who denies the Jewish Bolshevisk holocaust will be branded a “holocaust denier” and will face prison. (SAME WAY THE JEWS HANDLE THEIR HOLOCAUST)

    The President of the state of Israel will attend these annual dedications. Israel will be required to denounce Karl Marx and Max Engels publicly and teach about the Jewish reign of terror during the Bolshevisk revolution in its public school systems. The President of Israel will apologize profusely every year during ceremonies at these twin memorials for the Jewish murder of these innocents and promise to the world that Jewish communism will never surface again. Never again.

  38. KathJuliane May 26, 2009 @ 10:26 am

    “The virus of evil which again emerged in that part of the world in the 1990s of the past century has its roots in Serb territorial expansion and colonisation to the detriment of its neighbours. It is well documented but virtually unknown in the west that Serb forces slaughtered by conservative estimate some 100 thousand Albanians in Kosovo and Albania just during the peacetime period of 1918-1924.”

    Response: This is quite misleading and shallow to the point of being slanderous and defaming of both the monarchist Greek and especially the Serbian people who have always been American allies, especially during WW1 and WW2. As a matter of fact, Draza Michaelovic is a posthumously decorated American war-hero, receiving one of the highest honors given to a foreign national in 1948 by President Truman. If “Pan-Slavisim” is a “dirty word”, then so is “Pan-Germanism”.

    In the Balkans between 1918-1924 there was little or no “peacetime period” of 1918-1924. The facts of history indicate that even though the Great Powers had formally signed cessation of hostilities of WWI, the entire region was networked with Communist and nationalist revolutionary terrorist groups, often working in alliance with various other countries as “proxies” against the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, not to mention the Kingdom of Greece.

    These people, my folk, and their kings took the brunt of Communist Red Terror, who were overall the last to hold the line against the Communist Red Terror in the Balkans, when a good portion of Europe after 1919 were groaning under its revolutionary Socialist movements, most often disguised as, or integrated with nationalist movements. During and after WW2, Greeks suffered internal civil war between loyalists and Communists, as did the Serbs.

    It was not unusual during WW2 for Communist Partisans in each country to suddenly and duplicitously turn against the other loyalist and national resistance parties ostensibly fighting against a common enemy–the Axis Powers of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and their allies.

    This does not count all of the other regional nationalist revolutionary terrorist and espionage groups operating as “proxies” in undeclared warfare. The Balkans, especially King Alexander, stood their ground again with the collapse of both the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian Empires after WWI, and with the Bolshevik revolution raging in Russia and the Ukraine.

    The “Powder keg” of Europe -sometimes alternately known as the “Balkan Powder Keg,” – refers to the Balkans in the early part of the Twentieth century. In this time period there were a number of overlapping claims to territories and spheres of influence between the major European powers such as Russia, the Ottoman Empire, and Austria-Hungary and, to a lesser degree, Imperial Germany, Great Britain, and Italy.

    In addition to the European imperialistic ambitions and interests in this region, there was a growth in nationalism fostered by European intellectuals of various foreign influence with the indigenous peoples of this region leading to the formation of the independent states of Greece, Serbia, Montenegro, Bulgaria and Albania.

    Under the theory of the “Balance of Power”, Italy, Austria-Hungary and Imperial Germany, and her alliance with the Ottoman Empire formed the Triple Entente, with with Bulgaria and Albania, and of course, Croatia as part of the A-H empire prior to WWI within their sphere. On the Triple Alliance side, there was France, Britain and Russia, with Serbia and Greece within their sphere of influence, and by extension, America after committing to WW1.

    Within these nations there were movements to create “greater” nations, that is to enlarge the boundaries of the state beyond those areas where the national ethnic group was in the majority. This led to conflict between the newly independent nations and their former oppressor, Ottoman Turkey.

    Additionally, it led to differences between the Balkan nations who wished to gain territory at the expense of their neighbors. Both the conflict with Ottoman Turkey and between the Balkan nations led to the Balkan Wars in 1912-1913.

  39. KathJuliane May 26, 2009 @ 11:06 am

    In a different vein, the ideology of Pan-Slavism in Balkans gained popularity, but was not limited to just the Balkans but was, in fact, of interest to Slavic groups of Eastern Europe, most of whom were also Orthodox Christians as well, living under mostly Catholic sovereignty of the Austrio-Hungarian Empire, and The movement built around it in the region sought to unite all of the Slavs of the Balkans into one nation, Yugoslavia—“South Slavs”.

    This, however, would require the union of several Balkan states and territory which was part of Austria-Hungary. For this reason, Pan-Slavism was strongly opposed by Austria-Hungary, while it was supported by Russia which viewed itself as leader of all Slavic nations.

    To complicate matters, in the years preceding World War I, there existed a tangle of Great Power alliances, both formal and informal, public and secret, and it strongly appears that the real mischief-maker in this whole mess was the British throne which had more secret deals with everyone, whether they were Triple Alliance or the Entente, or elsewhere in the world.

    Ultimately this hearkens back to the Zionist Rothschild Bankers–“the Crown”–and perhaps the most evil document of all history–the Balfour Declaration.

    Following the Napoleonic Wars there existed a “balance of power” to, in theory, prevent major wars. This theory held that opposing combinations of powers in Europe would be evenly matched entailing that any general war would be far too costly for any nation to risk entering. This system began to fall apart as the Ottoman Empire which had been seen as a check on Russian power began to crumble, and as Germany, which had been a loose confederation of minor states, was united into a major power. Not only did these changes lead to a realignment of power, but of interests as well.

    All these factors, and many others, conspired to bring about the First World War. As is insinuated by the name “the powder keg of Europe,” the Balkans were not the major issue at stake in the war, but were merely the catalyst that led to the conflagration. The Chancellor of Germany in the late nineteenth century, Otto von Bismarck, correctly predicted it would be the source of major conflict in Europe.

    The “powder keg” “exploded” causing the First World War, which began with a conflict between imperial Austria-Hungary and Pan-Slavic Serbia. Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, a member of the Austrian royal family, was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist of the Black Hand movement.

    The Black Hand Society (or Black Hand Gang) was a Serbian secret society. It was believed to have been formed by ten individuals in 1911 with the stated single aim of creating a unified and greater Serbia through the means of violence. The Black Hand rejected all peaceful methods of achieving their aims.

    The Black Hand were involved in many bombings, political murders and several attempted assissinations of major figures. By 1914 there was thought to be well over two thousand members many of whom were from the military, senior civil service, teachers or lawyers.

    In June 1914 the Black Hand set out on their most spectacular mission – the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.

    Although the Serbian Prime Minister, Nikola Pasic, became aware of the plot and tried to stop it, the police and security forces failed to respond to his instructions so the Archduke was murdered and within a few weeks of the assassination the great powers of Europe had stumbled into the First World War.

    Nikola Pasic held the Black Hand responsible not only for causing the war but also for a series of military disasters that had crippled Serbia, and so in 1916 he began a purge of the organisation that resulted in the execution of many of its members over the next year or so. How many of the Black Hand survived the purge and to what degree they may have influenced the country in later times is not known .

    Some historians believe that a forerunner of the Black Hand was responsible for the savage murder of the Serbian King Aleksandar and his Queen, Draga, in July 1903. Their hideously mutilated corpses were thrown from a window in the royal palace … They regarded Aleksandr as an Austrian stooge.

    Austria-Hungary then issued an ultimatum to Serbia intended to provoke it to war through extreme demands. The Serbian government reservedly accepted all of the conditions of the ultimatum, except for condition number six which demanded the inclusion of Austria-Hungary in Serbia’s judicial inquiry into the assassination.

    Serbia indicated this would be unconstitutional and a violation of its sovereignty, and Austria-Hungary used it as a casus belli to invade Serbia. With Germany fully supporting them, the Austro-Hungarians partially mobilized their army against Serbia, that had already begun mobilizing before replying to the Austro-Hungarian July Ultimatum.

    Russia then began mobilizing in support of Serbia, though not bound by treaty to do so. Due to the system of European alliances, this led to a series of escalating Austrian and Russian mobilizations and eventually Germany and France were also obliged to mobilize and declare war.

  40. KathJuliane May 26, 2009 @ 11:40 am

    As even Winston Churchill once wrote about Jewish influence in the communist world:

    “This [communist] movement among Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt [Adam Weishaupt, the Bavarian founder in 1776 of one of the most famous conspiratorial groups, the Illuminati, in history], to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemberg (Germany), and Emma Goldman(United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development and envious malevolence, an impossible equality has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century.”

    (From a combination of sources: Wikipedia,, Encycl. Brittanica)

    The Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization, commonly known in English as IMRO), was the name of a de-facto revolutionary, national liberation movement in the Macedonia and Thrace regions of the Ottoman Empire. IMRO earned after the First World War a reputation as an ultimate terror network, seeking to change state frontiers in the Macedonian regions of Greece and Serbia (later Yugoslavia) and as a gangster organization inside Bulgaria.

    The organization was founded in 1893 in Ottoman Thessaloniki by a small band of anti-Ottoman Macedono-Bulgarian revolutionaries, who considered Macedonia an indivisible territory and claimed all of its inhabitants “Macedonians”, no matter their religion or ethnicity. Although in practice their followers were primarily of Bulgarian origins. The organization was a secret revolutionary society operating in the late 19th and early 20th centuries with the goal of autonomous Macedonia and Adrianople regions.

    After disbanding itself during the Bulgarian liberation of Macedonia (1915–1918), the organization was revived in 1920 under the name Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (IMRO), under which it is generally known today.

    Dimitar Vlahov, another extremely controvercial politician and revolutionary, who also alternated between pan-Bulgarian and pan-Macedonian nationalism, member of the left wing of the Macedonian-Adrianople revolutionary movement, later Bulgarian deputy in Ottoman Parliament, afterwards one of the main leaders of IMRO (United) – de facto extension of the Bulgarian Communist Party, was finally elected in 1946 as ethnic Macedonian vice-president of the Praesidium of Communist Yugoslavia’s Parliament.

    The initial period of idealism for IMARO ended, however, with the Vinitsa Affair and the discovery by the Ottoman police of a secret depot of ammunition near the Bulgarian border in 1897. The wide-scale repressions against the activists of the Committee led to its transformation into a militant guerilla organization, which engaged into attacks against Ottoman officials and punitive actions against suspected traitors.

    The guerilla groups of IMARO, known as “chetas” later (after 1903) also waged a war against the pro-Serbian and pro-Greek, anti-Communist armed groups during the Greek Struggle for Macedonia.

    In Spring 1903, a group by young anarchists connected with IMARO from the Gemidzhii Circle – graduates from the Bulgarian secondary school in Thessaloniki launched a campaign of terror bombing with the aim to attract the attention of the Great Powers to Ottoman oppression in Macedonia and Eastern Thrace.

    The Supreme Macedonian Committee was disbanded in 1905 but the centralist faction of the IMORO drifted more and more towards Bulgarian nationalism as its regions became increasingly exposed to the incursions of Serb and Greek armed bands, which started infiltrating Macedonia after 1903. The years 1905-1907 saw lots of violent fighting between IMORO and Turkish forces as well as between IMORO and Greek and Serb detachments. Meanwhile the split between the two factions became final when in 1907 Todor Panitza killed the right-wing activists Boris Sarafov and Ivan Garvanov.

    After the Young Turk Revolution of 1908 both factions laid down their arms and joined the legal struggle. Yane Sandanski and Hristo Chernopeev contacted the Young Turks and started legal operation. They tried to set up the Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization (MARO).

    Initially, the group developed only propaganda activities. Later, the congress for MARO’s official inauguration failed and federalist wing joined mainstream political life as the Peoples’ Federative Party (Bulgarian Section).

    During the Balkan Wars former IMARO leaders of both the left and the right joined the Macedonian-Adrianopolitan Volunteer Corps and fought with the Bulgarian Army.

    Others like Sandanski with their bands assisted the Bulgarian army with its advance and still others penetrated as far as the region of Kastoria southwestern Macedonia. In the Second Balkan War IMORO bands fought the Greeks and Serbs behind the front lines but were subsequently routed and driven out. Notably, Petar Chaulev was one of the leaders of the Ohrid-Debar Uprising organised jointly by IMORO and the Albanians of Western Macedonia.

    The stated goal of the original Committee was to unite all elements dissatisfied with the Ottoman oppression in Macedonia and the Adrianople Vilayet, eventually obtaining political autonomy for the two regions. In this task the organisation hoped to enlist the support of the local Vlachs, Greeks and even Turks.

    Efforts were concentrated on moral propaganda and the prospect of rebellion and terrorist actions seemed distant. The organization developed quickly: only in a matter of a few years, the Committee had managed to establish a wide network of local organisations across Macedonia and the Adrianople Vilayet. These usually centered around the schools of the Bulgarian Exarchate and had as leaders local or Bulgarian-born teachers.

    What is more, some of its younger leaders espoused radical socialist and anarchist ideas and saw their goal as the establishment of a new form of government rather than unification with Bulgaria.

    Eventually these considerations led the organisation to change its statute and accept as members not only Bulgarians but all Macedonians and Odrinians regardless of ethnicity or creed. In reality, however, besides some Vlach members, its membership remained overwhelmingly Bulgarian Exarchist.

    The result of the Balkan Wars was that the Macedonian region and Adrianople Thrace was partitioned between Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia and the Ottoman Empire (the new state of Yugoslavia was created as after 1918 and started its existence as Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenians “SHS”), with Bulgaria getting the smallest share.

    In 1913 the whole Thracian Bulgarian population from the Ottoman part of Eastern Thrace was forcibly expelled to Bulgaria. IMARO, now led by Todor Aleksandrov, maintained its existence in Bulgaria, where it played a role in politics by playing upon Bulgarian irredentism and urging a renewed war to liberate Macedonia.

    This was one factor in Bulgaria allying itself with Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I. During the First World War in Macedonia (1915-1918) the organization supported Bulgarian army and joined to Bulgarian war-time authorities when they took control over Vardar Macedonia temporarily until the end of war. In this period the autonomism as political tactics was abandoned from all internal IMARO streams and all of them shared annexationist positions, supporting eventual incorporation of Macedonia in Bulgaria.

    IMARO organised the Valandovo action of 1915, which was an attack on a large Serbian force. Bulgarian army, supported by the organization’s forces, was successful in the first stages of this conflict, managed to drive out the Serbian forces from Vardar Macedonia and came into positions on the line of the pre-war Greek-Serbian border, which was stabilized as a firm front until end of 1918.

  41. KathJuliane May 26, 2009 @ 12:14 pm

    What “peacetime” in the Balkans from 1918-24? It was a Bolshevik Communist terrorist war zone, which had no problem allying with the exiled Croatian Ustasi and Italy, all generously seasoned by the duplicity of even treatied European allies. (Wiki,, other searchables.)

    ITRO was a revolutionary organisation active in the Greek regions of Thrace and Macedonia to the river Strymon and Rhodope Mountains between 1922 and 1934. The reason for the establishment of ITRO was the transfer of the region from Bulgaria to Greece in May 1920.

    ITRO proclaimed its goal as the “unification of all the disgruntled elements in Thrace regardless of their nationality”, and to win full political independence for the region.

    Later IMRO created as a satellite organisation the Internal Western Outland Revolutionary Organisation, which operated in the areas of Tsaribrod and Bosilegrad, ceded to Yugoslavia. IMRO began sending armed bands called cheti into Greek and Yugoslav Macedonia and Thrace to assassinate officials and stir up the spirit of the oppressed population.

    In 1923 IMRO agents assassinated Bulgarian Prime Minister Aleksandar Stamboliyski, who favoured a détente with Greece and Yugoslavia, so that Bulgaria could concentrate on its internal problems.

    IMRO had de facto full control of Pirin Macedonia (the Petrich District of the time) and acted as a “state within a state”, which it used as a base for hit and run attacks against Yugoslavia with the unofficial support of the right-wing Bulgarian government and later Fascist Italy. Because of this, contemporary observers described the Yugoslav-Bulgarian frontier as the most fortified in Europe.

    In 1923 and 1924 during the apogee of interwar military activity according to IMRO statistics in the region of Yugoslav (Vardar) Macedonia operated 53 chetas (armed bands), 36 of which penetrated from Bulgaria, 12 were local and 5 entered from Albania. The aggregate membership of the bands was 3245 komitas (guerilla rebels) led by 79 voivodas (commanders), 54 subcommanders, 41 secretaries and 193 couriers. 119 fights and 73 terroristic acts were documented.

    Serbian casualties were 304 army and gendarmery officers, soldiers and paramilitary fighters, more than 1300 were wounded. IMRO lost 68 voivodas and komitas, hundreds were wounded. In the region of Greek (Aegean) Macedonia 24 chetas and 10 local reconnaissance detachments were active. The aggregate membership of the bands was 380 komitas led by 18 voivodas, 22 subcommanders, 11 secretaries and 25 couriers. 42 battles and 27 terrorist acts were performed.

    Greek casualties were 83 army officers, soldiers and paramilitary fighters, over 230 were wounded. IMRO lost 22 voivodas and komitas, 48 were wounded. Thousands of locals were repressed by the Yugoslav and Greek authorities on suspicions of contacts with the revolutionary movement. The population in Pirin Macedonia was organized in a mass people’s home guard. This militia was the only force, which resisted to the Greek army when general Pangalos launched a military campaign against Petrich District in 1925, speculatively called the War of the Stray Dog.

    At the same time an youth’s extension of IMRO, the Macedonian Youth Secret Revolutionary Organization was created. The statue of MYSRO was approved personally from IMRO’s leader Todor Alexandrov. The aim of MYSRO was in concordance with the statue of IMRO – unification of all of Macedonia in an authonomous unit, within a future Balkan Federative Republic.

    In 1924 IMRO entered negotiations with the Comintern about collaboration between the communists and the Macedonian movement and the creation of a united Macedonian movement. The idea for a new unified organization was supported by the Soviet Union, which saw a chance for using this well developed revolutionary movement to spread revolution in the Balkans and destabilize the Balkan monarchies. Alexandrov defended IMRO’s independence and refused to concede on practically all points requested by the Communists.

    No agreement was reached besides a paper “Manifesto” (the so-called May Manifesto of 6 May 1924), in which the objectives of the unified Macedonian liberation movement were presented: independence and unification of partitioned Macedonia, fighting all the neighbouring Balkan monarchies, forming a Balkan Communist Federation and cooperation with the Soviet Union.

    Failing to secure Alexandrov’s cooperation, the Comintern decided to discredit him and published the contents of the Manifesto on 28 July 1924 in the “Balkan Federation” newspaper. VMRO’s leaders Todor Aleksandrov and Aleksandar Protogerov promptly denied through the Bulgarian press that they’ve ever signed any agreements, claiming that the May Manifesto was a communist forgery.

    Shortly after, Todor Alexandrov was assassinated in unclear circumstances and IMRO came under the leadership of Ivan Mihailov, who became a powerful figure in Bulgarian politics. While IMRO’s leadership was quick to ascribe Alexandrov’s murder to the communists and even quicker to organise a revenge action against the immediate perpetrators, there is some doubt that Mihailov himself might have been responsible for the murder. The result of the murder was further strife within the organisation and several high-profile murders, including that of Petar Chaulev (who led the Ohrid-Debar Uprising against the Serbian occupation) in Milan and ultimately Protogetov himself.

    In this interwar period IMRO led by Aleksandrov and later by Mihailov took actions against the former left-wing assassinating several former members of IMORO’s Sandanist wing, who meanwhile had gravitated towards the Bulgarian Communist Party.

    Gjorche Petrov was killed in Sofia in 1922, Todor Panitsa (who previously killed the right-wing oriented Boris Sarafov and Ivan Garvanov) was assassinated in Vienna in 1924 by Mihailov’s future wife Mencha Karnichiu. Dimo Hadjidimov, Georgi Skrizhovski, Alexander Bujnov, Chudomir Kantardjiev and many others were killed in the events on 1925.

    Meanwhile, the left-wing later did form the new organisation based on the principles previously presented in the May Manifesto.

    The new organisation which was an opponent to Mihailov’s IMRO was called IMRO (United). It was founded in 1925 in Vienna. However, it did not have real popular support and remained based abroad with no revolutionary activities in Macedonia. It remained active until 1936 and was funded by and closely linked to the Comintern and the Balkan Communist Federation.

    Mihailov’s group of young IMRO cadres soon got into conflict with the older guard of the organisation. The latter were in favour of the old tactic of incursions by armed bands, whereas the former favoured more flexible tactics with smaller terrorist groups carrying selective assassinations.

    The conflict grew into a leadership struggle and Mihailov soon in turn ordered the assassination in 1928 of a rival leader, General Aleksandar Protogerov, which sparked a fratricidal war between “Mihailovists” and “Protogerovists”. The less numerous Protogerovists soon became allied with Yugoslavia and certain Bulgarian military circles with fascist leanings and who favoured rapprochement with Yugoslavia.

    The policy of assassionations was effective in making Serbian rule in Vardar Macedonia feel insecure but in turn provoked brutal reprisals on the local peasant population. Having lost a lot of popular support in Vardar Macedonia due to his policies, Mihailov favoured the “internationalization” of the Macedonian question.

    He established close links with the Croatian Ustashi and Italy. Numerous assassinations were carried out by IMRO agents in many countries, the majority in Yugoslavia.

    The most spectacular of these was the assassination of King Alexander I of Yugoslavia and the French Foreign Minister Louis Barthou in Marseille in 1934 in collaboration with the Croatian Ustashi.

    The killing was carried out by the VMRO assassin Vlado Chernozemski and happened after the suppression of IMRO following the 19 May 1934 military coup in Bulgaria.

    IMRO’s constant fratricidal killings and assassinations abroad provoked some within Bulgarian military after the coup of 19 May 1934 to take control and break the power of the organization, which had come to be seen as a gangster organization inside Bulgaria and a band of assassins outside it.

    In 1934 Mihailov was forced to escape to Turkey. He ordered to his supporters not to resist to the Bulgarian army and to accept the disarmament peacefully, thus avoiding fratricides, destabilization of Bulgaria, civil war or external invasion. Many inhabitants of Pirin Macedonia met this disbandment with satisfaction because it was perceived as relief from an unlawful and quite often brutal parallel authority.

    IMRO kept its organization alive in exile in various countries, but ceased to be an active force in Macedonian politics except for brief moments during Word War II.

    As the Bulgarian army entered Yugoslav Vardar Macedonia in 1941, it was greeted by most of the population as liberators and former IMRO members were active in organising Bulgarian Action Committees, charged with taking over the local authorities.

    Some former IMRO (United) members, such as Metodi Shatorov, who was the regional leader of the Yugoslav Communist Party, also refused to define the Bulgarian forces as occupiers, contrary to instructions from Belgrade and called for the incorporation of the local Macedonian Communist organisations within the Bulgarian Communist Party. This policy changed towards 1943 with the arrival of the Montenegrin Serb Svetozar Vukmanović-Tempo, who began in earnest to organise armed resistance to the Bulgarian occupation.

    Many former IMRO members assisted the authorities in fighting Tempo’s partizans.

    Also in Greece the Bulgarian troops occupied the whole of Eastern Macedonia and Western Thrace, where they were greeted from the greather part of the local Slavic-speakers as liberators. Bulgaria officially annexed the occupied territories in Yugoslavia and Greece, which had long been a target of Bulgarian irridentism.

    IMRO was also active in organising Bulgarian militias in Italian and German occupation zones against Greek nationalist and communist groups as EAM-ELAS and EDES.

    With the help of Mihailov and Macedonian emigres in Sofia, several pro-Bulgarian armed detachments “Ohrana” were organised in the Kastoria, Florina and Edessa districts. These were led by Bulgarian officers originally from Greek Macedonia – Andon Kalchev and Georgi Dimchev.

    It was apparent that Mihailov had broader plans which envisaged the creation of an Macedonian state under a German control. It was also anticipated that the IMRO volunteers would form the core of the armed forces of a future Independent Macedonia in addition to providing administration and education in the Florina, Kastoria and Edessa districts.

  42. Hoff May 26, 2009 @ 2:23 pm

    This is good. Anyone that knows the jew Frank Boas knows what he is talking about.


  43. Higgins May 26, 2009 @ 5:10 pm

    Where’s James Traficant when we need him??

    A political prisoner!

    He and Pat Buchanan helped Demjanjuk out before.

    If he’d have been Sheriff, those Feds would have left Ohio empty-handed!

  44. jgalindes May 27, 2009 @ 4:16 am

    Dear Hoff

    That video on JWO (jew world order or government,as you like) is a must see!

    As well as Kevin McDonald website:


  45. Michael K. May 27, 2009 @ 4:27 am

    Dear RZN Christians,

    I have had an interesting time trying to understand the Old Testament. Undoubtedly, it pertains to God and Israel, but more importantly it has many literary contradictions and some things in it seem like outright fabrications.

    Now, before accusing me of being irreligious, let me assure you that I believe in God from a Christian perspective. But, it seems to me that the Old testament is a continued source of justification for some of the most atrocious behavior ever committed by men. Take for example this sampling of quotes, from a scholarly article entitled “Holocaust and Holodomor” :

    The ethnocentric hostility of the Jews-consistently commented on by the peoples who have encountered them over the millennia-can be traced ultimately to the origins of Judaism as set forth in the Torah, e.g., Genesis 9:25 (“Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren”); Exodus 17:14-16 and 34:12-13 ; Numbers 24:8 (“God. . . shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows”), 25:6-13 (wherein God commends Phineas for his initia-tive in running a javelin through both parties to a marriage of Jew and gentile), 31:7-19 and 33:50-56; and Deuteronomy 2:33-35 (“[on God’s command] we. . . utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain”), 3:4-7, 7:1-5 (“thou shalt. . . utterly destroy them”), 7:14-26 (“thine eye shall have no pity”), 20:10-17 (“thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth”) and 25:19. Disdain for ordinary labor-to be performed by Esau and Edom, but to be exploited by Israel-appears as early as Genesis 25:23-27, as discussed in note vii below.

    Basically, the OT holds many such nuggets of hatred and foolishness. That’s why I say, the Old Testament is not a sacred text, per se… It deals with the sacred, it depicts things which truly may have occurred, but it does so through a lens of racial chauvinism and Jewish deceit. It is a mixed blessing, and it corrupts and perverts the unwary.

    For example, the extermination through biological warfare and infanticide of 9/10th’s of the Native American people was in part propelled by literal readings of the Scriptures, which of course gave license to English styling themselves “Israel” to commit genocide without remorse.

    When we look at the OT through the lens of the teachings of Jesus, we can’t help but see a whole lot of things which just aren’t reconciled facially, yet we also see the prophecy and wisdom of old which does corroborate the Truth of the message he brought to us. Why can’t the two be reconciled perfectly ? This is a good question for the Orthodox, who have all the answers given by the founding fathers of Christianity.

    It is my belief, that since the OT tells us that the Ark of the Covenant was hidden or lost, and the original scriptures themselves lost at the time of Judea’s captivity in Babylon, and since we know that what we call the Old Testament isn’t all that old, it seems reasonable that Pharisaic Jews wrote the OT in the period after captivity. This being true, the insertion of racist misanthropic teachings into the tradition of “Israel” seems to have been a deliberate act, a rewrite of the true early history surrounding the coming of God’s Shekinah and what it really meant.

    Were the Old Testament reports not patently false, or at best half-true, there would have been little room for Christ to improve things. But actually, many people have observed such a different spirit in the NT from the OT that they conclude that the books refer to two different Gods. While that isn’t likely the truth, it may be reasonably supposed that the entire OT was deliberately adulterated by the Pharisaic Jews to make the worship of the devil, Baal Moloch appear to be the worship of the Creator God mentioned in certain parts of the OT.

    Thus when the OT says, paraphrasing, “God instructed them to dash the babies brains out and dance a little kike dance,” it seems reasonable to suppose that the Gog in question is not the Creator God whose Shekinah appeared to Moses, but is in fact their ancestral demon to whom they are attached through the worship of Baal Moloch.

    I wonder what the Orthodox have to say about this? The fact is, if the Jews are in the habit of falsifying all writings to favor their tribal agenda, it is impossible to accept the OT at face value as anything like “The Word Of God.” The Holocaust is just one example of how quickly the Jews rewrite the past to justify the present. Maybe that is why it is just the New Testament that the Noachtides want banned as “idolatry.”

  46. Fr. John May 27, 2009 @ 6:15 am

    “It is a Christian DUTY to start documenting and talking about the Jewish Bolshevisk holocaust against the Ukranians and Russians which claimed the lives of 66 million.

    This should be continued by the Russian Orthodox Church, and the Orthodox Church in general and all Christian Churches..then it should be introduced as standard history in public school textbooks in America and Russa. Then there should be talks in public libraries, universities and cultural centers to bring light to this important issue.”

    Isabella, don’t hold your breath on this one!

  47. Isabella May 27, 2009 @ 6:49 am


    “There is no person living in the world today who has not, in one way or another, been affected by this horrible 1917 takeover of Russia. Without the Bolshevik revolution there would have been no Communist China, no Cold War for more than 40 years, no Korean war, no war in Vietnam and no suppression of the people in the Baltic nations; Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania and Yugoslavia.

    Sixty million people were murdered in China under Communism, millions in other nations and Christians sent to labor camps in many nations. People who have lived under Communism were deprived of living a normal full life in freedom as God had intended.

    Yes, the Devil did it, but his helpers were men like Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Parvus, Warburg, Rothschild, Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan and all the others.

    If decent people who lived in the last century would have known this, they could have stopped it. But they chose not to find out the truth. Are we, who are living now any nobler, are we willing to find out the truth and act upon it? How will our great grandchildren judge us if the Lord allows another hundred years to roll on?”

  48. Skip Baker May 27, 2009 @ 7:43 am

    I think when folks say “Bolshevik” it should always be “Jewish Bolshevik” or “Jewish Soviet” so that new readers will see that all of the torture and murder of the commies was Jewish. Period.

    Jesus Christ and His Chosen and Faithful will win this battle against these Satanist Jews perhaps even before the Second Coming.

    The “Thousand Years” of Revelation are in the past and this is the little season where Satan was loosed for a little while after the Thousand Years of freedom from most of the Jewish Usury.

    When they say the Kol Nedri to give themselves permission to lie and do false oaths in the coming year, their father the Devil “blesses” them. They will have the help of their Beast for “One Hour” which is 22 days at the end, and then the 10 Kingdoms will turn on Israel and “burn her with fire.”

    We will be rid of lying Jews forever.

    The fact they hid the finding of the Ark under the cross of Christ and the finding of His Blood on the Mercy Seat is amazing. That’s why they didn’t want people to know it had been found. Christ’s blood wasn’t what you could call human since it had only 24 chromosomes and ONE Y to make Him a male:


  49. KathJuliane May 27, 2009 @ 9:11 am

    Greetings in the Lord Jesus, Skip:

    There are very serious problems with the alleged ark of the covenant find of Ron Wyatt’s.

    There are dozens of sites, pro and con, but even though Wyatt was SDA, his own denomination is disavowing his work (see I Dolphin link).

    Wyatt’s Theology

    “Although in many of his public presentations Wyatt did not emphasize his personal theological underpinnings, he was in fact a devoted Seventh Day Adventist. Many of his “conclusions” about the results of his efforts were based on SDA theology, and specifically the alleged visions and teachings of Ellen G White…

    …Wyatt and his promoters have, in general, refused to answer the questions raised by such detractors. Instead, they have most often chosen to address the questions in general by calling into question the sincerity or honesty of the questioner.

    “If Wyatt’s report was factual, then we should get serious about his site for the Ark. But was Wyatt a trustworthy observer and reporter? Months later I followed up on this story, referring to my long-time friend John Baumgardner, who had personally visited Wyatt’s Ark site, and had subjected the whole area to minute scrutiny, including a survey with penetrating radar.

    When I described to John the eyewitness report of Wyatt, he simply laughed and dismissed the whole thing. He assured me, beyond any doubt, that the Ark site under study revealed no cavitation as described by Wyatt, and that the description given to me was entirely a fabrication….

    So there you have it. I am a long-time member of the S.D.A. fraternity, and have a high regard for Scripture and for handling its text in a responsible way. I am embarrassed that Wyatt, who identified himself with my community of faith, should turn out to be an unreliable witness to important archaeological data. I cannot put any confidence in his opinions, his assertions, or his declared eyewitness reports. Yet the man I knew, now at rest, was truly a man of The Word. …

  50. Isabella May 27, 2009 @ 9:54 am

    I haven’t checked out the evidence of Wyatt’s Arc of the Covenant, but there have always been religious mysteries. And a mystery, by nature, will always be contested because… that’s why it’s a mystery…~!

    One such is the “Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown–a battle between the Priory of Sion and Opus Dei over the possibility of Jesus Christ of Nazareth having been married to and fathering a child with Mary Magdalene.

    The novel has provoked a popular interest in speculation concerning the Holy Grail legend and Magdalene’s role in the history of Christianity. The book has been extensively denounced by many Christian denominations as a dishonest attack on the Roman Catholic Church. It has also been criticized for its historical and scientific inaccuracy.

    Many critics say that Brown should have done much more research before publishing this book. On February 22, 2004, an article titled “The Last Word: The Da Vinci Con” appeared in the New York Times by writer Laura Miller.[6] Miller attacks the Da Vinci Code on multiple levels, referring to it as “based on a notorious hoax”, “rank nonsense”, and “bogus”, as she points out how heavily the book rests on the fabrications of Pierre Plantard (including the Priory of Sion which did not exist until Plantard created it) who in 1953 was arrested and convicted for just such frauds.

    Critics accuse Brown of distorting and fabricating history. For example, Marcia Ford wrote:

    “ Regardless of whether you agree with Brown’s conclusions, it’s clear that his history is largely fanciful, which means he and his publisher have violated a long-held if unspoken agreement with the reader: Fiction that purports to present historical facts should be researched as carefully as a nonfiction book would be.[7] ”

    Richard Abanes wrote:

    “ The most flagrant aspect … is not that Dan Brown disagrees with Christianity but that he utterly warps it in order to disagree with it … to the point of completely rewriting a vast number of historical events. And making the matter worse has been Brown’s willingness to pass off his distortions as ‘facts’ with which innumerable scholars and historians agree.[7]”

  51. Isabella May 27, 2009 @ 9:57 am

    Da Vinci quotes from Wikipedia.

  52. Isabella May 27, 2009 @ 10:23 am

    @Skip Baker

    Agree the correct terminology is “Jewish Bolshevik” or “Bolshevik Jew”

  53. KathJuliane May 27, 2009 @ 11:15 am

    “I haven’t checked out the evidence of Wyatt’s Arc of the Covenant, but there have always been religious mysteries. And a mystery, by nature, will always be contested because… that’s why it’s a mystery…~!”

    Dear Isabella, true enough about religious mysteries in general. But Wyatt’s claims for the Ark’s physical find are backed up by what he presented as also scientific evidence. The discipline of “Biblical archeology” is as rigorous a science as any archeology.

    Archeology itself demands meticuluously documented “provenance”, or origins or source, and well detailed notes on archeological methods. For one thing, Wyatt was not a trained archeologist. Biblical archeologists, who would be delighted with confirming his finds, as well as secular archeologists, have gone over the same ground, and simply do not come up with the same results on many of Wyatt’s find sites.

    Now, he did find some interesting things which are being further investigated, like possible chariot wheels in the Red Sea, but finding one thing doesn’t prove the finding of something else, each is an mutually exclusive event.

    In other words, finding “chariot wheels” in the Red Sea doesn’t scientifically or logically prove that he also found the Ark in Jerusalem.

    Key principles behind the scientific method is testing the primary result and then repeatability, all under scientific scrutiny, especially something like stating that he did preliminary lab work on a blood sample with certain DNA results.

    So far as I’ve gleaned, neither the original lab results, which should be very well documented from numerous aspects, the prepared specimens, like microscope slides, or the original sample are available for further any inquiry or research. Nowhere to be found, yet Wyatt’s assertions are based on hard evidence, of which only image media remains.

    All that’s left is a video of a microscopic inspection of “something” that is supposed to be “living blood”.

    As “living blood” then the photos should look like real red blood cells, which are very distinctive under the microscope and a very easy tissue cell type to classify in a high school biology class.

    There’s no paper trail that proves that the sample came from the claimed location and then followed a methodical chain of evidence and custody, and then professional efforts by very sincere and enthusiastic Biblical scientists to retrace his trail and investigations come up with much different results than what Wyatt claimed, or nothing at all.

    So, these are the kinds of problems, and they are numerous.

  54. Isabella May 27, 2009 @ 1:16 pm

    It does not bother me that Wyatt was not a trained archeologist..there are brilliant people everywhere who don’t have academic credentials.

    Agree that chariot wheels do not prove the Ark, but they do mean something in that area of the world and in that place…this could simply mean that there just wasn’t enough evidence to be conclusive..

    Agree that original lab slides would be very important. Also, a paper trail and a chain of evidence would be as well, but in an imperfect world does that mean his claim is impossible or does it simply mean there’s not enough evidence available to come to his conclusion?

  55. Jim DeTexas May 27, 2009 @ 2:13 pm

    Re: The Ark etc….

    One thing to remember all of that is in the hands of the Anti-Christ Zionist Jews who love to cast doubt on anything Christian.

    So who can trust any of it without the actual physical examination of each piece

  56. Enya May 27, 2009 @ 3:22 pm

    Saint Simon of Trent any many other little boys were ritually murdered by Jews.

    20 were canonised but de-canonised in 1965!!! I wonder why?

  57. charlie May 27, 2009 @ 6:32 pm

    What happened to all the Jews in positions of power in the USSR, after its fall?

    Presumeably they held on to their positions and still rule Russia. There was no ‘purge’ as I recall, peaceful or otherwise.

    Did they (some/many/all) join the mass exodus to Israel?

    Are they now running Israel?

    Does anyone have any insight into these important questions?

  58. KathJuliane May 27, 2009 @ 10:47 pm

    Dear Michael K,

    The ethnocentric hostility is not the fault of the Old Testament, nor is the God of Israel of the OT an evil god, because the Scripture is holy; the perverted use that Rabbinic Pharisee Judaism has made of it with their Talmudism; even in the New Testament Jesus and the apostles were constantly trying to correct the Scribes and Pharisee interpretations in their “traditions of men”. Everywhere the Talmud puts in the mouths of the rabbis: “Read this not as such and such, but as such and such.”

    The Galileans and Samaritans adhered to the true understanding of Scripture, having no patience with the Judean Rabbis and their “traditions of men”.

    Also, after the desolation of Jerusalem, the Rabbis of Palestine canonized the “Jewish canon” of Scripture, and had subtly altered the text or its meaning, such as removing anthropomorphisms of God, as a polemic against Jesus the Messiah. In copying Scripture, only the two or three core consonants made up a Hebrew word, so those couldn’t be altered at all, but suffixes, prefixes, were not. Under the rabbinic notions, the “Stricken Messiah” became the “Leper Messiah”, for example.

    The OT has several different literary styles which doesn’t come through in like the KJV, a history of the people, the Law, the Prophets, the Writings, the genealogies, sometimes ancient battle or victory poetry glorifying the greatness of God, elsewhere the OT concerns the Messiah. God is good, but Israel is the “stiffnecked and rebellious people”. Not everything that is recorded about Israel was commanded by the word of God or that He approved of it, but out of their own, often evil, self-will and disobedience. In that, Scripture is very honest about human deeds and failures.

    English texts in the West relied most often on Hebrew texts from the Rabbinic sources, and quite often Biblical commentary also relied on Rabbinic sources. Also English doesn’t pick up the idiomatic qualities of Hebrew very well. Now the great commentators like Lightfoot were very careful about handling rabbinic sources and always interpreted through the light of Christ and patristic sources. English also doesn’t pick up well the idioms and “punning” that is often used in Hebrew verses, or that Hebrew words generally describe actions of God, ie. In Genesis 1, our thinking might see a 24-hour day, when it’s really focused on is the action of creation.

    Let’s run through one, and maybe you’ll see what I mean.

    Genesis 9:25: This one is a great baffler about Canaan, but let me make a stab at my own personal interpretation from Scripture (which the rabbis made a very nasty, racist mess of.). “Now Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside.”

    In the Middle East, customary traditions and laws stick around for a very long time, and remain very consistent. In the Law of Moses, “nakedness of his father” is a euphemism for an incestuous relationship between a son and a mother or a step-mother.

    But, if a son was intent on usurping his father’s place as the patriarch of the tribe or kingship, one way, that ambition was sometimes accomplished anciently by taking the father’s wives and concubines in public knowledge or view of the rest of the tribe. I believe this is probably what is alluded to.

    The word “drunken” in this word-sense is that Noah was drunken, tipsy and naked inside the tent. Ham, the second son, then fornicated with Noah’s wife in the harem portion of the tent, as a sign of usurpation of not only Noah’s headship, but also Shem’s place as the firstborn son.

    Then Ham boasts of it to his two brothers outside. And Shem and Japeth took a garment, laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and “covered the nakedness of their father (Noah’s disgraced wife and their mother), and their faces were backward [they didn’t countenance Ham’s usurpation, and they saw not their father’s personal nakedness, his shame and vulnerability for being intoxicated.]

    And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son (Ham as the second-born) had done to him. Like Reuben the first-born who did the same thing to Jacob, and so lost his birthright position, Ham lost his place as second-born, and Japheth the youngest then assumed the second-born position in terms of inheritance.

    When this blessing was uttered is not precisely clear, but it would seem that Noah found out everything when his wife gave birth to Canaan, the incestuous son of Ham’s adultery (in the Law of Moses. Adultery biblically is either an incestuous union or fornication with a married woman, or any relationship that made it impossible for marriage.)

    In any case, when this prophecy is read in a descriptive sense in terms of the consequences of Ham’s folly concerning Canaan as well as Shem being the son that starts the incarnation line, the reading has an entirely different sense. :

    And Noah said:

    “Cursed be Canaan [humiliated];
    A servant of servants shall he be to his brothers [in the sense of a chief steward over other servants; a household steward; he is cursed because he’s a mamzer, has no inheritance rights or status, so his condition is the curse. But Noah gives Canaan a ‘status’-chief steward].

    He also said,
    “Blessed be the Lord God of Shem (‘Name’; through whom Christ would come to save the world starting the incarnation line);
    And Canaan shall be his servant.
    May God enlarge Japheth [expansion],
    And let him dwell in the habitations of Shem.
    Let Canaan be his servant as well.

  59. Hoff May 28, 2009 @ 12:55 am

    This is what the Jews do.

    Transcript: “The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea is that we smash things that aren’t true. We don’t believe in the boundaries of nation state, we don’t believe in the idea of this individual gods that … that protect individual groups of people.

    These are all artificial contructions and Judaism really teaches us to see that. ln a sense our detractors have us right in that we are a corrosive force. We are breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people because they are not real .. and that is upsetting to people.” – Douglas Rushkoff – Author: Nothing Sacred: The Truth About Judaism.

    This is how the jews do it – the big picture.

    “The Enemy Within”

    This is how the jews enforce their conquest.

    “How to Destroy Nations with Love and Tolerance”

  60. Hoff May 28, 2009 @ 12:55 am

    The more ”democracy” a country is the more the jews are in control of that country. What you call ”media” in all the ”dumbo-cracy” is totally controlled by jews and is nothing but the jews brainwashing-machine. Talmud Vision = TV.

    What you call ”paper” is nothing but jewish propaganda pamphletters. All printed stuff, anything you ever seen on Talmud Vision and on radio has gone thru a jewish filter. Or in short, we are brainwashed to think and act as jews.

    Every single person in ”media” is a jew. lt do not matter if they are DNA-jews or not, they all think and act as jews. What is going to destroy all western nations is the forced mass invasion from all 3 world countries.

    This would be easy to put a stop to – if not for one thing – all the jews in the ”media” smear-slander anyone that talk about putting a stop to the mass invasion of being the bogus accusation NAZI, or the bogus accusation ”antisemite”, means NAZI, or the bogus accusation RACIST, or the the bogus accusation … well, unless you live in a cave you know all the smear-slander word. The jewish propaganda-machine spews the bogus accusation words 24-7 and have been doing it for decades now.

    lf you still can’t see it then the jews really got you brainwashed.

    Why the jews love Darwin, and why you lose. Unless … you start to use your brain and tell like it is: It’s the jews!

    “Survival of the Fittest”

    And this is what the jews wants you to be.

    “Zionist Extremism”

  61. Lynda May 28, 2009 @ 1:37 am

    Yes, Enya, I wonder why the children martyred for the faith in their innocence like little St Hugh of Lincoln and St Simon of Trent were (post Vatican II) – decomissioned as it were. Not that I think you hold the right of the Church to recognize saints reigning in heaven with Our Lord. These children were sacrificed as blood passovers.

    The simplest answer suffices. Prior to Vatican II, you have the Roman Catholic Church 1 A.D – 1958 A.D. after Vatican II you have a novus ordo church and its antipapacy that is in possession of the Roman Catholic infastructure worldwide.

  62. Lynda May 28, 2009 @ 1:56 am

    Dear Michael K,

    You have to be very careful of a statement like: “it seems reasonable that Pharisaic Jews wrote the OT in the period after captivity. This being true, the insertion of racist, misanthropic teaching into the tradition of Israel seems to have been a deliberate act, a rewrite of the true, early history..” May 27, 09

    Both the Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Church hold with the Apostle Paul: “Now these things happened to them as a warning, but they were written down for our instruction (not not emulation, but instruction) upon whom the end of the ages has come. Therefore let anyone who thinks he stands, take heed lest he fall.”
    1 Cor 10:11,12

  63. Jason May 28, 2009 @ 4:52 am

    Obama’s Supreme Court nominee just another Jewish pawn:

  64. Pony Express May 28, 2009 @ 5:55 am


    One of those oligarchs, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, still sits in jail. I read that Putin made a deal with a number of them. He told them they could keep the money they had, but they had to leave. I think most of them did.

    Those who continued to do business in Russia had some of their companies taken over by the state. Putin has not left them in control. He’s very smart, and he moves to his own timetable.

    But when he declared that Russia was returning to its Orthodox roots, that was the line in the sand, IMHO.

  65. JOHN JONES JR May 28, 2009 @ 7:51 am


  66. JOHN JONES JR May 28, 2009 @ 7:53 am


  67. Mr. Dickie Pope May 28, 2009 @ 11:13 am

    The Jews!!! How about the Masonic British and their American brothers. Aren’t they responsible for helping ‘God’s Chosen People’ to carry out their One World Order and population control agenda?

    The first head of the Russian Communist bank was William Boyd Thompson whose prior job was the head of the Federal Reserve.The multi-billionare Armand Hammer had an office next door to Lenin’s, yet he’s seldomly pilloried in the remaining non-jewish owned press.

    Russian Communism became the template for world control by the plutocratic oligarchs. The big money at the top of the pyramid send the pit bull jews out to harvest the Christian sheeple via statist communism. And they certainly relished their jobs!

    The ‘Anti-Semitism’ label (where is the corresponding ‘ANTI-JAPHITE’ saw?) was used often by the satanic State Department of the US to silence any critic; psychological warefare at its best.

    The derelict, malfeasant, and heretical past four popes (Fr.s Roncalli, Montini, Wotyla, and Ratzinger) and their ‘Aggiornamento Brigade’ have consistently, by their words and deeds: favored the wisdom of the world perpetrators, silenced any thoughts to the contrary, and facilitated this push towards a world government.

    The dichotomy ‘traditionalist/progressive’ is Orwellian double speak for ‘Catholic/heretical non-Catholic. A great psychological victory of confusion and non-action was released upon the whole Catholic world by these ‘accepted labels’. The substitution of the later for the former has effectively perverted Catholic action. These prelates bear much responsibility for this injustice. Is anyone making the case for these popes being of jewish extraction?

    Recall how these popes talked at the UN (does not recognize any rights outside those they give us -Almighty God be damned!-and was instituted by the State Department, masons and communists) or spoke about the need for a one world order.

    Recall not hardly a peep was heard by these Vatican II mongrels when Pope Pius XII was called ‘Hitler’s Pope’. To this day Frs. Odi and Capovilla (Fr Roncallis’ secretaries) have not strayed from these thoughts an iota.

    The hollowcost (sp.?) industry is the icing on the cake for these perfidious united Jews and top Masons (corporations and companies-Shakespeare’s ‘Thomas More’) to give us the tyrannical laws that are being thrust on us today, as they prepare to usher in WWIII and total control.

    ‘Terrorist’…’terrorist’…’terrorist’ ad infinitum/ad nauseum. Thank God for all those Executive Orders and all those anti-terrorist laws that OUR (?) lovely Congress (yes, they have been royally screwing us!!!) has passed to keep us secure and free!

    Remember sheeple its ‘The Law’ and lets not forget St. Paul’s Romans epistle on ‘obedience to the state’. Didn’t Our Lord teach ‘vengeance is mine’, so don’t worry the Lord will work it out.

    Thank God for 501c3 Christians out there who have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to discern true Christians and accepted God’s will.

    Yes, its the Jews, and Masons, and CFR, and Fabian Society, and UN, and foundations, and fake Christians in collusion with all those out there who do not want to know; keeping their blinders on as they relish the ‘good life’ and collect their paychecks, even if they are working for a most sordid corporation or company or government to the demise of us all.

  68. Michael K. May 28, 2009 @ 2:39 pm

    Dear KathJuliane and Lynda,

    Indeed, I have to step cautiously because of the sacred nature of Scripture as a whole. However, what of the particular assertion that the Scriptures were written from memory and long after the events depicted actually happened?

    Since this seems to be true, and it furthermore seems to be the case that the Babylonian religious system had influenced the writers, I think it is fair to wonder how much was prevaricated, if for no other reason than out if ignorance and at a loss for factual sources. I think this explains some of the fundamental flaws in Scripture, such as ‘God’s’ demand for infanticide, and general genocide, when Christ himself would later say in reference to children, “As much as you do to the least of these, you do to me as well.”

    Otherwise, there is no consistency between the demands of God as regards the treatment of children. Since I find it impossible to believe Christ is wrong, it stands to reason that the Jews remembered something wrong. Otherwise, it is possible to infer that there exists ‘divine schizophrenia’, and I too have to reject that. All that leaves is that the rabbis wrote it wrong, or maybe there is something I don’t know.

    Some have stated that they believe that the Canaanites were half-demonic, thus it was not true human-on-human genocide, but rather the battle of humans versus Nefilim. While this explanation satisfies the requirement that God not appear arbitrary, bloodthirsty, or schizophrenic, it lacks proof.

    Since this is a key hangup I have regarding the OT, I would appreciate if you could answer this directly. God bless you.

  69. KathJuliane May 28, 2009 @ 3:08 pm

    Regarding Amelek in the OT. In Deut. 25:17 is the key answer to the generational hostility. Amelek became the personification of the “evil strong man” in war against God. The Amelek metaphor may have been behind our Lord’s parable about plundering the “Strong Man”, which the Church has long regarded as an OT type of the Evil One.

    “Remember what things Amelek did to thee by the way, when thou wentest forth out of the land of Egypt: how he withstood thee in the way, and harassed thy rear, even those that were weary behind thee, and thou didst hunger and wast weary; and he did not fear God (an apostate from the God of Abraham).. And it shall come to pass whenever the Lord thy God shall have given thee rest from all thine enemies round about thee, in the land which the Lord thy God gives thee to inherit, thou shalt blot out the memorial of Amelek from under heaven, and shalt not forget to do it.”

    It was the households of old people, the women and the children that always traveled at the rear of the nomadic migration.

    A kinsman of the Israelites through Esau, Amalek nevertheless displayed the most intense hatred toward them far beyond Esau’s natural animosity towards his brother Jacob at times. When other nations hesitated to harm Israel, even Edom merely stood at the borders of Seir in unfriendly defensiveness rather than offer desert hospitality especially due to kindred, symbolized by the offering of bread, water and salt, which Edom didn’t do.

    Amalek—the first foe to attack the people of Israel without provocation after they had come out of Egypt as a free nation; twice designated in the Pentateuch (Ex. 14:14-16, Deut. 25:19) as the one against whom war should be waged until his memory be blotted out forever—became in Hebrew tradition the type of Israel’s arch-enemy, and by allegorical type, God’s war against the Evil One of the world.

    Amelek’s example as the worst of the desert marauders often induced Edom and the other tribes to join him in the fray. “Like a robber he waylaid Israel”; “like a swarm of locusts”; “like a leech eager for blood”; “like a fly looking for sores to feed on”; Amalek (‘am laḳ = the people which licketh) hurried over hundreds of miles to intercept Israel’s march.

    In the immediate context, to “blot out the name of Amelek from under heaven” meant to have no fellowship or covenants with the blood-related but evil Amelekites, imitate their vile ways, nor offer sacrifices at the tabernacle on their behalf, as Israel did for other kinsmen in good standing. In other words, excommunicated from any worship at the tabernacle of God with the congregation of Israel, which as blood kin and circumcised members of the ancient covenant of Abraham, and were permitted to do so under the Law of Moses as long as they remained faithful to the God of Abraham.

    But to “blot out the remembrance” was also a colloquial prophetic admonishment to Israel to strengthen the force of the Law of Moses concerning God’s justice and mercy for the orphan, the widow, the helpless, the sick, and the stranger in the midst of Israel. Something on the order of: “Do evil as the Amelkites do, Oh people of Israel, and I, the Lord will make war on you, too.”

    They were a nomadic nation in Palestine. That the Amalekites were related to the Edomites (consequently also were Hebrew brothers by blood to Israel), can be concluded from the genealogy in Gen. 36:12 and in 1 Chron 1:36.

    On the other hand, Gen. 14: 7 speaks of Amalekites, in southern Palestine, in the time of Abraham. The Amalekites were the first to come in contact with the Israelites (Ex. 17:8), vainly opposing their march at Rephidim, not far from Sinai (compare Deut. 25:17, “smiting the hindmost, all that were feeble behind,” and I Sam. xv. 2). Consequently, they must be considered as possessors of the Sinaitic peninsula.

    The Amalekites themselves always appear as murderously hostile to the Lord God and to Israel (and through Christian interpretation, to Jesus Christ and the Church).

  70. FreeGaza May 28, 2009 @ 6:20 pm

    Bloodpassover has been removed. Need to cut and paste as many articles as possible.

    Carl Bernstein’s Operation Mockingbird: The CIA in American Newsrooms also keeps disappearing.

    Thank you all for your courage in speaking the truth.

  71. Hoff May 28, 2009 @ 7:36 pm

    Who Will Stand Up to the Zionist Masters of America and Israel?
    by Paul Craig Roberts

    “Obama Calls on World to ‘Stand Up to’ North Korea” read the headline. The United States, Obama said, was determined to protect “the peace and security of the world.”
    Shades of doublespeak, doublethink, 1984.

    North Korea is a small place. China alone could snuff it out in a few minutes. Yet the president of the U.S. thinks that nothing less than the entire world is a match for North Korea.

    We are witnessing the Washington gangsters construct yet another threat like Slobodan Milosevic, Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, John Walker Lindh, Yaser Hamdi, José Padilla, Sami al-Arian, Hamas, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the hapless detainees demonized by former secretary of defense Rumsfeld as “the 700 most dangerous terrorists on the face of the earth,” who were tortured for six years at Gitmo only to be quietly released. Just another mistake, sorry.

    The military/security complex that rules America, together with the Israel Lobby and the banksters, needs a long list of dangerous enemies to keep the taxpayers’ money flowing into its coffers.

    The Homeland Security lobby is dependent on endless threats to convince Americans that they must forgo civil liberty in order to be safe and secure.

    The real question: who is going to stand up to the American and Israeli governments?

    Who is going to protect Americans’ and Israelis’ civil liberties, especially those of Israeli dissenters and Israel’s Arab citizens?

    Who is going to protect Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans, Lebanese, Iranians, and Syrians from Americans and Israelis?

    Not Obama, and not the right-wing brownshirts who today rule Israel.

    Obama’s notion that it takes the entire world to stand up to North Korea is mind-boggling, but this mind-boggling idea pales in comparison to Obama’s guarantee that America will protect “the peace and security of the world.”

    Is this the same America that bombed Serbia, including Chinese diplomatic offices and civilian passenger trains, and pried Kosovo loose from Serbia and gave it to a gang of Muslim drug lords, lending them NATO troops to protect their operation?

    Is this the same America that is responsible for approximately 1 million dead Iraqis, leaving orphans and widows everywhere and making refugees out of one-fifth of the Iraqi population?

    Is this the same America that blocked the rest of the world from condemning Israel for its murderous attack on Lebanese civilians in 2006 and on Gazans most recently, the same America that has covered up for Israel’s theft of Palestine over the past 60 years, a theft that has produced 4 million Palestinian refugees driven by Israeli violence and terror from their homes and villages?

    Is this the same America that is conducting military exercises in former constituent parts of Russia and ringing Russia with missile bases?

    Is this the same America that has bombed Afghanistan into rubble with massive civilian casualties?

    Is this the same America that has started a horrific new war in Pakistan, a war that in its first few days has produced 1 million refugees?

    “The peace and security of the world”? Whose world?

    On his return from his consultation with Obama in Washington, the brownshirted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that it was Israel’s responsibility to “eliminate” the “nuclear threat” from Iran.

    What nuclear threat? The U.S. intelligence agencies are unanimous in their conclusion that Iran has had no nuclear weapons program since 2003. The inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency report that there is no sign of a nuclear weapons program in Iran.

    Whom is Iran bombing? How many refugees is Iran sending fleeing for their lives?
    Whom is North Korea bombing?

    The two great murderous, refugee-producing countries are the U.S. and Israel. Between them, they have murdered and dislocated millions of people who were a threat to no one.

    No countries on earth rival the U.S. and Israel for barbaric, murderous violence.

    But Obama gives assurances that the U.S. will protect “the peace and security of the world.” And the brownshirt Netanyahu assures the world that Israel will save it from the “Iranian threat.”

    Where is the media?

    Why aren’t people laughing their heads off?

  72. KathJuliane May 28, 2009 @ 8:02 pm

    Fate of Amalek.

    David, after hundreds of years of Amalek lawlessness, harassment, banditry and plunderings, waged a sacred war of extermination against the Amalekites, ever the thorn in the side of Israel and other nations, who retaliated (I Sam. 30:1) by a successful surprise of Ziklag.

    David, however, followed and caught the Amalekites on the retreat, regaining their captives and spoils. On this occasion the Amalekites made their raids upon camels. After this defeat Amalek disappears, so that it seems as though the nation had actually been extirpated by the wars with Saul and David.

    I Chron. 4:42-43 states that in the time of Hezekiah five hundred Simeonites annihilated the last remnant “of the Amalekites that had escaped” on Mount Seir and settled there in the place of Amalek. Thus the related tribes Amalek and Edom were united again at the end.

    Through the Christian lens, the focus is on the moral lessons. Amalek was but the scourge in the hand of God to punish the people of Israel, who had become “faint and weary” in the observance of God’s commands and “feared not God.”, that is lack of faith and even contempt for the Lord Who had condescended to dwell with man.

    At Rephidim, “the people reviled Moses, saying ‘Give us water’, and murmured against God, testing Him. “And he called the name of that place, Temptation, and Reviling…because of the reviling of Moses by the children of Israel, and because they tempted the Lord. They lacked the power of faith (play on the name “Rephidim”-“the hands became weak”), and therefore said: “Is the Lord among us or not?” (Ex 17: 7, 8).

    To really get the grasp of this, not long before, the Lord God had brought Israel out of Egypt with a show of great wonders through Moses. He spoke friend to friend with Moses, manifesting Himself in front of the people.

    Like a wayward child that runs back to its father when a dog comes snarling along, the Israelites were unmindful of God’s doings until like a feral dog Amalek came to bite them. Then Moses fasted and prayed, saying: “O Lord, who will in the future spread Thy Torah (“Teaching”, Law), if Amalek succeeds in destroying this nation?” And with uplifted arms, holding the staff and pointing heavenward, he inspired Joshua and the people with his faith until the victory was won.

    The Fathers also interpreted Moses with his arms stretched wide to have been a type for Jesus Christ on the Cross. Jesus after His resurrection also spent much of the 40 days before His ascension detailing to the apostles and disciples all the places in Scripture (NT wasn’t written yet) that pertained to Him.

    With regard to the remarkable oath, “Truly the hand upon the throne of Yah! the Lord will have war with Amalek (the Evil One) from generation to generation” (Ex. 17:15-16 LXX, “The Lord my Refuge. For with a secret hand the Lord wages war upon Amelek to all generations); even the rabbis say: “Never will the throne of God—the Lord of Truth, Justice, and Love—be fully established until the seed of Amalek—the principle of hatred and wrongdoing—be destroyed forever.

    In Rabbinic thinking, however, henceforth “Amalek” became the popular term for any Jew-hater.

    Of course, today with the cowardly hyena state of Is-unreal-hell running insanely amok in Palestine, destroying helpless men, women and children, true everywhere the Judeo-Masonic Zionist imperialist tentacles of NATO-stan are spreading towards Central Asia, there is no doubt as to whom is the real “Amelek” these days.

  73. Greta May 28, 2009 @ 11:58 pm

    Brother Nathanael,

    Zions Bilderberg participants are well schooled in the Machiavellian methods needed to enact a world wide monarchy, primarily because many of them hail from royal origins.

    If you hadn’t noticed they are also adept at applying the very structures of Orwell’s book 1984 in a way the average “Prole” can’t associate, for the simple reason that they are labelled differently and carry ever so subtly different roles.

    That said it seems obvious that there are now, in the final throws of establishment, four pillars of control not too dissimilar from the fabled ministries of the Orwellian universe, they being a Ministry of Plenty (IMF), Ministry of Love (UN), Ministry of Truth (ICC), and the Ministry of Peace (WHO-military-industrial germ warfare branch).

    Just remember, when the Sharp or Sony telescreen is installed free to every room of your home; be happy, you’re never ever alone, not even in your mind!

  74. Isabella May 29, 2009 @ 6:55 am

    Here is a list of prominent Jewish Communists

    V.I. Lenin, maternal Grandfather was Jewish .

    Leon Bronstein (Trotsky): supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army.

    Grigory Apfelbaum (Zinoviev): executive, Soviet Secret Police.

    Solomon Lozovsky: deputy Soviet foreign minister.

    Maxim Wallach (Litvinov): Soviet foreign minister.

    Yuri Andropov: director, Soviet KGB, later dictator of the Soviet Union.

    Jacob Sverdlov: first president of the Soviet Union.

    Jacob Yurovsky: commander, Soviet Secret Police.

    Mikhail Kaganovich: deputy commissar of heavy industry

    Genrikh Yagoda: chief of Soviet Secret Police

    Matvei Berman and Naftaly Frenkel: founders, the Gulag camp system.

    Boris Berman: executive officer of the Soviet Secret Police and brother of Matvei.

    K.V. Pauker: chief of operations, Soviet NKVD Secret Police.

    M.I. Gay: commander, Soviet Secret Police.

    Leiba Lazarevich Feldbin (Aleksandr Orlov): commander, Soviet Red Army; officer, Soviet Secret Police.

    Yona Yakir: general, Soviet Red Army, member of the Central Committee.

    Dimitri Shmidt: general, Soviet Red Army.

    Yakov (“Yankel”) Kreiser: general, Soviet Red Army.

    Miron Vovsi: general, Soviet Red Army.

    David Dragonsky: general, Soviet Red Army, Hero of the Soviet Union.

    Grigori Shtern: general, Soviet Red Army.

    Mikhail Chazkelevich: general, Soviet Red Army.

    Shimon Kirvoshein: general, Soviet Red Army.

    Arseni Raskin: deputy-commander, Soviet Red Army.

    Haim Fomin, commander of Brest-Litovsk, Soviet Red Army.

    Sergei Eisenstein: director of communist propaganda films .

    Ilya Ehrenburg, Minister of Soviet Propaganda

    Solomon Mikhoels: commissar of Soviet propaganda.

    Soviet propagandist: Yevgeny Khaldei who staged the photo of the raising of the hammer and sickle flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, May 2, 1945.

    Nikolai Bukharin: Lenin’s chief theorist.

    Karl Radek: member, Central Committee.

    Mikhail Gruzenberg (Borodin) commissar.

    A.A. Yoffe: commissar.

    David Ryazanov: advisor to Lenin. Lev

    Lev Rosenfeld (Kamenev): member of the Central Committee.

    Ivan Maisky: Soviet Ambassador to Britain.

    Mark Osipovich Reizen: Soviet propagandist, winner of three Stalin Prizes.

    Lev Leopold Trepper: Soviet espionage officer.

    Bela Kun (Kohen): dictator of Hungary in 1919.

    Zakharovich Mekhlis: top executioner for Stalin.

    Moshe Pijade: commander, Yugoslav Communist People’s Army.

    In post-war Poland Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police.

    The Politboro commander Jacob Berman and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski.

    Julius Hammer, M.D.: co-founder of the American Communist Party.

    Armand Hammer: fundraiser and financier for Lenin and Stalin, son of Julius.

    Lev Davidovich Landau: Stalinist physicist, co-father of the Soviet atomic bomb.

    Klaus Fuchs: helped steal atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.

    Ruth Werner: colonel, Red Army GRU intelligence, assisted Fuchs.

    Julius and Ethel Rosenberg: stole American atomic bomb secrets for Stalin.

    Morris Cohen (Peter Kroger): assisted the Rosenbergs.

    Markus Wolf: chief of German Communist Stasi Secret Police.

    Howard Fast: American communist propagandist for Stalin.

    David Dubinsky: Stalin’s ally, head of the U.S. International Ladies Garment Workers Union.

    Nahum Goldmann: founder, World Jewish Congress, Communist propagandist.

    Rabbi Moses Rosen: agent, Romanian Communist Party.

    Victor Rothschild: top British espionage agent for Stalin.

  75. Freedon May 29, 2009 @ 7:21 am

    Lyrics by Zaeger & Evans

    In the year 2525
    If man is still alive
    If woman can survive
    They may find…

    In the year 3535
    Ain’t gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
    Everything you think, do, or say
    Is in the pill you took today

    In the year 4545
    Ain’t gonna need your teeth, won’t need your eyes
    You won’t find a thing to chew
    Nobody’s gonna look at you

    In the year 5555
    Your arms are hanging limp at your sides
    Your legs got nothing to do
    Some machine, doing that for you

    In the year 6565
    Ain’t gonna need no husband, won’t need no wife
    You’ll pick your son, pick your daughter too
    From the bottom of a long glass tube

    In the year 7510
    If God’s a comin’ he ought to make it by then
    Maybe he’ll look around himself and say
    “Guess it’s time for the Judgement day”

    In the year 8510
    God’s gonna shake his mighty head
    He’ll either say “I’m pleased where man has been”
    Or tear it down and start again

    In the year 9595
    I’m kinda wondering if man’s gonna be alive
    He’s taken everything this old earth can give
    And he ain’t put back nothing…

    Now it’s been 10,000 years
    Man has cried a billion tears
    For what he never knew
    Now man’s reign is through
    But through the eternal night
    The twinkling of starlight
    So very far away
    Maybe it’s only yesterday…

  76. KathJuliane May 29, 2009 @ 10:52 am

    Dear Michael K,

    The OT is a struggle that I do appreciate, especially since we’ve been pretty well Judaized mentally already to half believe that the Rabbis wrote the Bible, the Jews were “chosen” because of some great god-like qualities of their own and were created from the beginning as supermen different from ordinary humans, and “invented” the ideal of monotheism, in other words, when such was not the case at all.

    And, the most peculiar twist in all of this, is that the Jewish scholars and thinkers ever anxious to prove the deity-like qualities of their superhuman brains in their “culture of critique” are the most anxious to rationally “deconstruct” their own Sacred Scripture—the meta-narrative of over 2,000 years, describing the spiritual history of God, Revelation, and His people in the OT as imaginative fictions and myths, constructed from other cults by their own ancestors and their super-genius minds.

    The one thing the Jewish and apostate Christian Zionists all agree on though, is that even though God is a Jewish Talmudic philosophical pantheistic idea, and Abraham perhaps a Hindu myth carried over into Hebrew history, God made a covenant with Abraham and gave the land of IsraHell to the Jews as a “possession forever”.

    Then we have the New Atheists and their own peculiar ammoral ethics, and which have murdered and caused more suffering on more people in the 20th century for the sake of utopian bliss and peace than in all of the accumulative history of mankind, judging God by peering into the OT, and with astounding hypocrital horror, proclaiming Yahweh as some kind of “moral monster” for “genocide”, which is a 20th century humanistic, rationalistic and ethical concept born of Dawinism, Malthus, and Social “Evolution”, which is fundamentally without morals, only the ethic of what is practical and expedient.

    Today’s “new atheists” are not at all impressed with the moral credentials of the Old Testament (OT) God. Oxonian Richard Dawkins thinks that Yahweh is truly a moral monster: “What makes my jaw drop is that people today should base their lives on such an appalling role model as Yahweh-and even worse, that they should bossily try to force the same evil monster (whether fact or fiction) on the rest of us.”

    Maybe this will help unbend some neurons. At Exodus 20:1 “All these words” refers to the Ten Commandments or “Ten Words”. But what need was there for these to be written? For God implanted all His laws in man’s nature when He created him. It was necessary because of free will and man’s corruption through sin (John Cassian, see also Rom. 2:14, 15). Christ gave His written Law through Moses to make sin known (Rom 3:20; 7:7). Man’s God-given natural law, written in the conscience, was dulled and darkened through disobedience between Adam and Moses. The Mosaic Law helped renew this knowledge of sin to lead man to repentance to God.

    However, the written law is a LOWER standard than the law of nature (John Chrysostomos), for these commandments in the OT condescended to man’s weakness and thus refer only to keeping the body pure. But in the New Testament, the law of Christ elevates man to be pure in both body and soul.

    Another thing, like at Exodus 20:5, God the Father as the Divine Person is distinctly and ineffably Other beyond human comprehension, is without passion, but He condescends to call Himself a jealous God to show the intensity of His love for man, and condescends to certain other anthropomorphisms in the OT, as well as meet us on our own level. Moses brought out the people to meet with God, that is, God the Son. He is the Lord who came down on Mt. Sinai, and He is God, for it was He that spoke to Moses on the mountain.

    The Jews acknowledged that God spoke to Moses as a friend, but said concerning Jesus they did not know where He was from (Jn 9:29). The Son of God, prefiguring the Incarnation, humbled Himself to allow Moses to see and talk with Him (St. Gregory the Theologian), and He humbled Himself in the extreme by becoming Man to be crucified for us.

    The real issue then, is facing up to the fact that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was also there in the OT as the pre-Incarnate Lord God of Israel . Ouch. There is no “bad Yahweh”/”Good Jesus”.

    Yes, the God of the New Testament is the same as the God of the Old Testament, a God of love and grace. Evidence of His love and grace are rampant throughout both covenants The holy and inspired Church Fathers, geniuses in their own rights, themselves cultivated a spirit of humility before an infinite God we cannot fully understand because “all the available facts are not all the facts.” God never committed any crimes against humanity, much less unthinkable ones, because we cannot see ourselves, or Him, accurately.

    We have to depend on God’s revelation of human nature–which is that, apart from God, we are wicked and rebellious and evil, without His grace to sustain us against the current, mankind since the Fall is prone to follow a kind of law of spiritual, mental, entropy even at the same time that we are His image-bearers. And on His revelation of His own nature–which is that He is Holy and Just. As the sovereign Lord of all creation, He would have been completely within His rights to allow every single human being to go to hell because that is what we deserve. But He didn’t.

  77. KathJuliane May 29, 2009 @ 7:18 pm

    How Could a Compassionate God Order the Genocide of the Canaanites? Now of course I can give the answer in the Bible, i.e., that God gave them 400 years to repent and that their sins were horrible, etc.; but I suppose the real question is “ethical”.

    How can God who has such compassion for the innocents in Ninevah order the wholesale killing of innocent children in Palestine? Is the God of the OT and the God of the NT the same Person? How can I reconcile these, in modern terms, “unthinkable” crimes against humanity with the God of compassion revealed by Jesus?

    It is clear enough that the training of Israel in the Old Testament and the great commission of bringing the Gospel to the world in the New are two totally different things.

    Israel was to be established as a self-contained nation in a single country preparing to bring forth the Messiah. The Church was to be drawn out of every nation to act as a centre of witness of Jesus Christ and the Cross in every country. Her weapons were not to be carnal. She was to preach the Word, and to bear her witness by patient suffering.

    It is unthinkable that any Christian group could rightly claim to have received a direct, specific command to slaughter their enemies without mercy; this one specific and Personally revealed command from the Lord God alone justifies the ancient Israelites in their historical actions against just the Canaanites and no one else, and absolutely justifies nothing that the Zionist Jews and apostate Christian sycophants are pressing forward today in the nightmare of Is-unreal-hell.

    Perhaps the horror of the misuse of these Scriptures causes the most persistent uneasiness. They have been misused in the past, misused now, and they may be misused again. But this objection, though very searching, is not really valid.

    Of course the Devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. He did so during our Lord’s temptation, and he has done so all down the history of the Church. ‘Cursed be every one who hangs on a tree’ must have been a goad in the mind of Saul the persecutor, as he thought of the Christian’s belief in a crucified Messiah.

    Thinking to make himself a eunuch for the kingdom of God’s sake, Origen is said to have castrated himself. Christians have persecuted unbelievers into the church, because our Lord said ‘Compel them to come in’. The great churches and the little sects have all erred.

    Every heresy and every malpractice have their text, and the Bolsheviks even used phrases from Scripture for their own propaganda and malevolent ends. People will climb mountains to freeze to death to await the Second Coming, they will indulge in wild orgies, they will set up fanatical commonwealths, they will smell out innocent people and burn them as witches or heretics, they will argue the flatness of the earth – every kind of wickedness, depravity and folly will seek to justify itself from Scripture.

    Yet this is no argument against the truth of Scripture, nor against its entire wholesomeness when rightly understood.

    If the Old Testament narratives are to be taken as a straight forward record of the history of God and His people of both the OT and the NT, there is no room for doubt that God intended to ‘clear away’ the Canaanite peoples, and that he ordered their utter destruction when defeated in battle by Israel. Here are the crucial passages:

    ‘When the Lord your God brings you into the land which you are entering to take possession of it, and clears away many nations before you, the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than yourselves, and when the Lord your God gives them over to you, and you defeat them; then you must utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant with them, and show no mercy to them. You shall not make marriages with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons.

    ‘For they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods; then the anger of the Lord would be kindled against you, and he would destroy you quickly. But thus shall you deal with them: you shall break down their altars, and dash in pieces their pillars, and hew down their Asherim, and burn their graven images with fire.’

    ‘In the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as the Lord your God has commanded; that they may not teach you to do according to all their abominable practices which they have done in the service of their gods, and so to sin against the Lord your God.’

    These directions are represented as the most solemn commands of God. If they are in fact so, we have a deep problem to grapple with. If on the other hand they are merely directions which Moses wrongly attributed to God, or if they are directions such as a later generation thought God ought to have given to Moses, there is no problem at all. It is simply a case of fallible man misrepresenting God – one more example of a religious man sincerely believing that by an evil act he was doing God a service.

    If it is argued that we are not meant to take passages like this literally, but that we are to extract some word of God from them – say, the need for complete dedication to good and for implacable opposition to evil – then an end is put to all sane exegesis enough to work out the moral dilemma in some fashion.

    The passage purports to be literal; to take it in any other way is to throw oneself into a bottomless pit of fluffy subjectivism. It is a species of allegorizing for a type of weak-gut political correctness, which relieves the Bible of all perceived offence while depriving it of all relevance concerning the merciful, all-compassionate and infinitely just Almighty God and His sovereign rule, which includes His perfect justice.

    If the supposed commands are not history, then there is no problem, we can all become New Atheists. But neither is there hope of the Bible giving answers to the problems of history and ultimately our faith in Christ our Lord and Savior…and our Judge.

  78. Michael K. May 30, 2009 @ 5:54 am

    Dear KathJuliane,

    You have certainly ‘one the extra mile’ for my sake, and for the sake of God. Thank You. Whether or not the OT is historically accurate remains a mystery to me. If, as I have supposed, it was all written thousands if not hundreds of years after the fact. And came from the memory of a people who had already bowed down to, in their own account, worship an idol representing King Nebachadnezzer. Then there is substantial room for doubt.

    I don’t wish to be taken as an atheist for saying I don’t know what the historical truth is, and having a reasonable doubt. In my somewhat subjective view, I realize that short of witnessing “The Akashic Record,” as Rudolf Steiner claims to have done, and thereby witnessing by remote viewing the actual events as they took place, I have to allow such things to be called “mysteries.” Now Steiner said he could corroborate the events of the NT, even though he was not previously fully convicted in such beliefs himself, and was deeply moved to see them in the sense of ‘a movie’.

    I guess I have to be grouped a “New Atheist” for having a reasonable doubt, if that’s what you think. You are the greatest scholar of religion I have ever met. However, I would have to also say that I believe that puts me in the company of those followers of Christ who believed that the Laws of the OT could be understood to be fulfilled in the Golden Rule. They had called into question the whole definition of religious piety by cleaving to a higher and more difficult, if much simpler, standard.

    I started my journey with Jesus Christ the Messiah when I learned the ‘Golden Rule’ at the age of five. I would not study the Old Testament in detail at all until I was an adult, although I read parts of the New Testament as a kid. I am from ‘The Nations’, and I approach God through Christ, not through the Old Testament. And Christ said that I don’t need to worry about what’s in the OT. It’s all taken care of if I scrupulously listen to him and his Laws.

    Reading the OT, I was impressed with these thoughts: ‘Wow, there is no such thing as a new kind of sin, because Israel sinned in ways I couldn’t have imagined, and yet they are in the Bible.’ / ‘This is a record of every evil thing that’s ever been done.’ / ‘Why don’t these people listen to God, what He’s saying is the only good part of this Book.’ / ‘This doesn’t solve anything, it just raises more questions.’

    So I guess I’ll have to take to heart that the Law of God is a living Word, and put texts down there with the Law of Moses as revealing sin. For in the same way a man cannot get sheep’s milk from parchment, he cannot get the Living Word form a book. The most a book can do is guide you in what to seek. To me the Atheist/Theist divide is whether or not one believes God has a personality, and the Christian/all-others divide is whether or not one believes that that divine personality is revealed in the person and ministry of Jesus Christ as Savior and Messiah. I believe in both,

    Still, I think I would be disbarred from being an Orthodox Christian because of my reasonable doubts concerning the veracity of books. But I will continue to give credit to Orthodox Christians of maintaining the TRUE AN UNBROKEN TRADITION of what those books really mean in the practice of daily life. And it is this meaning which I must agree with in Spirit, for it is what I was taught and still believe is the true Christianity.

  79. Isabella May 30, 2009 @ 7:24 am


    Agree: China can take care of North Korea..

    The only country in the mid-east with WMDs is Israel…

  80. Lynda May 30, 2009 @ 9:41 am

    Dear Michael K,

    The abominable practices of idolatry referred to in the ‘scorched earth’ policies of Joshua (Yashuah) in the Israelite invasion we know both from the Biblical and archeological record:

    child sacrifices to Moloch
    Human sacrifice and cannibalism of Ba’ al idolatry
    Institutionalization of the four sins crying to heaven for vengeance.

    So why were they singled out for the type of destruction detailed in the relevant O.T. passages above other devil worshippers?

    Look at the West today. Not a lot of difference that I can see – except we don’t yet have public feasts in human blood. Although we do have more sacrifices of innocent blood to Moloch in the national abortion industry than all the Hitittes, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites etc put together.

    In his own time, what did your gentle Jesus of the lilies of the field have to say about these types of nations where all this had been merely driven underground, nations that scoffed at his teaching and public miracles? Matthew chapter 11.

  81. Lynda May 30, 2009 @ 9:52 am

    The scriptures both O.T. and N.T. belong to the Covenants.

    The Church prays and considers the sacred texts in the Divine liturgy and the Ordo. It takes about 3 years to go through the entire Bible.

    The texts are not of private interpretation – the stuff of endless disputations. Why the Canaanites? Why not us? Why not the Babylonians where it all began? Why not Tyre and Sidon? There is no end to these objections and arguments.

    From Brother Nathanael’s personal testimony, it was the O.T. that he opened up to his family to show them that Jesus is the Messiah of Israel. It was these scriptures that St Peter opened on the Day of Pentecost (today in the Western Calendar) to show that Jesus is the Messiah, the one of whom David testified in Ps 2 “Ask of me and I will give the Gentiles for thy inheritance and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.”

  82. KathJuliane May 30, 2009 @ 10:48 am

    Michael K a “New Atheist” because of inner struggle with the words of the OT? Not in the least! Perish the thought! I was being facetious about the world of the likes of Dawkins and their obnoxious hypocrisy.. And, something like Jacob wrestling with the Angel of the Lord, the OT troubled me quite a bit as well, especially trying to unravel the modern “chosen race” issue.

    Approaching the OT from the NT (literally New Covenant) in the fullness of the Revelation of our Lord Jesus is precisely how Christians have, and should view the Old Covenant.

    Some of what we do run into is what was originally meant like with the word “Torah”, which is translated as “Law”, but is better interpreted as “Teachings” or “Way”. “Orthodoxy” is the comparable term for “Torah”. The early Church of the Apostles before naming themselves as “Christians”, referred to themselves as “Followers of the Way”. The “Ten Commandments” are better understood as “The Ten Words”.

    The great Sermon on the Mount, in fact, is the “Mount Sinai” for the people of Jesus Christ, and equally, if not more, momentous. It is there, that the “Law-giver like Moses” that Moses prophesied of, spoke in ways like “You have heard”, You have read” which all refer to the Law of Moses, and then Christ, as the Son of God Who gave the Law to Moses originally, then with authority says “But I say…”, which was always in terms of the higher standard of purity of soul, based on the foundations of the Law of Moses.

    So, Christians, and their societies should obey the higher law of the New Covenant, which when looking at the failures of old Israel in their 1600 years, also we woefully fall short of the mark our Lord has set.

    Anyway, to return to God’s commands about the particular Canaanite tribes, any attempts to mitigate or tone down this command to totally wipe out the population are ruined on the clear instructions of texts like Exodus 23:32-33, 34:12-16, Deuteronomy 7:1-5, and 20:15-18.

    For one essential thing to remember about all of this is that God, Who loves mankind beyond all words that could be expressed only in the Incarnate Word, but is also dispassionate as well, anything that He does that may seem to us unmerciful and unjust to us, is ultimately never without the compassion of a surgeon, so to speak.

    The presence of the term ‘herem’ in the sense of “forced destruction” constantly was applied to the Canaanites and thus they are marked for extermination, but it was not for the purposes of “genocide”, but the extirpation of an extremely virulent and corruptive religion, against which the OT reveals that old Israel fell into much more often than they remained faithful to God and the Law of Moses.

    It was only on the backs and the hearts of the “7000 faithful of Israel” that God had reserved to Himself, the inspiration of the holy prophets, and the few reforming kings that Faith was kept moving forward until Messiah would come.

    Once again we are back to the question, “Will not the judge of all the earth do right?” It is the question Abraham asked of God, just before He destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. It would seem clear that the OT does uphold the justice and righteousness of God, even in this command to eradicate the Canaanites. But along with the ethics of the Law, in terms of God’s righteous judgments, are the prophecies and narratives that do example His mercy, and willingness to modify His own decrees towards leniency if certain conditions exist, primarily repentance unto Him.

    To place the whole question in perspective, let the principle of Deuteronomy 9:5 be cited concerning Israel then, and the Jews today:

    “It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land; but only account of the wickedness of these nations, the Lord your God will drive them out before you, to accomplish what he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

    Therefore, there is no attempt to establish a tacit or real moral superiority for Israel; the text informs us to the contrary in its explicit statements and narratives. The call of Yahweh cannot be traced to Israel’s superiority in righteousness or numbers, “but it was because the Lord loved you and kept the oath which he swore to your forefathers.” (Deut. 7:6-8).

    Ultimately, the unconditional oath sworn to Abraham, “the father of nations”, was that the Savior, the “Desired One of All Nations”, would come from his own loins. Even the Talmud puts into the mouths of the pre-Christian Rabbis “Scripture only prophesied of the Messiah.”

    With some justification, one wonders why it is, then, that “…Israel is helped in spite of her sins, while the Canaanites are destroyed because of theirs?” The answer does NOT lie with the fact that Israel is vastly more righteous than the Canaanites, but it does lie in the increasing degrees of guilt that Canaan accrued. Even Jesus appealed to this principle in dealing with a comparison of cities in his day as judged over against Sodom and Gomorrah (Mat. 10:15). There had been a patient waiting from Abraham’s time “for the sin of the Amorite…[to reach] its full measure.” (Gen. 15:16)

    This is not to say that Israel was permitted or even ordered to treat all other nations the same way, and it is clear that God intended this as a special circumstance in His own wisdom, and not “the norm” in its day 3500 years ago, and certainly not the basis of the indiscriminate license to murder that the Babylonian Pharisees have pretensiously assumed today, for Deuteronomy 20:10-15 orders them to offer conditions of peace, rather than extermination to all others.

    However, the verses that follow, namely 16-18, disallowed the same offer to be given to Canaan. In fact, the Hebrew wars with other nations (except Canaan) were designed to be only in self-defense.

  83. KathJuliane May 30, 2009 @ 12:38 pm

    Why then were the Canaanites singled out for such severe treatment? They were cut off to prevent Israel and the rest of the world from being corrupted (Deut. 20:16-18). It has been with the archeological recovery of the Ugaritic texts some seventy years ago that biblical scholars have been able to exonerate the horror of the ancient historians and scholars, pagan Greek, Roman, and Christian, about the utter ruin these debased “Canaanite cults” did to societies once they infected them.

    When a people starts to burn their children in honor of their gods (Lev. 18:21), practice sodomy, bestiality, and all sorts of loathsome vice (Lev. 18:23, 24, 20:3), that after 400 years, the land itself begins to “vomit” them out as the body heaves under the load of internal poisons (Lev. 18:25, 27-30). Four hundred years for the repentance of Canaan is longer than the USA has been in constitutional existence.

    It is true that in the NT, our Lord Jesus Christ did not directly endorse this particular act of judgment against Canaan, as He did the annihilation of Sodom and Gomorrah and the drowning of Noah’s contemporaries, yet he sets His seal on the book of Deuteronomy in a peculiarly clear way. Judging by the number of his quotations from it, it might be regarded as His favorite book.

    It was certain that Deuteronomy, or “Second Law” as the reaffirmation of the covenant between God and the people of Israel. Here the legal tradition of the book of Exodus (for example the Decalogue or the Covenant Code) is not just repeated; it is reinterpreted in contemporary terms, so that the promises and demands of the covenant were brought near to every worshipping Israelite.

    Well founded on the Law of Moses, the distinctive teaching of Deuteronomy, which could be called the royal law, is that the worship of the Lord was to be centralized in one place, so that the syncretism characteristic of local shrines may be eliminated (ch 12). When it was published, the Jerusalem temple had long been regarded as the central sanctuary, established by King David.

    Deuteronomy was most likely the “book of the law” (2 Kings 22:11) that prompted King Josiah’s (transl cognate: “Jesus”!) sweeping religious reform in 621 BC (2 Kings ch 22-23), long before the Babylonian exile. There is a generally “ignored” little passage concerning the king: “And when he (the king) shall be established in his government, then shall he write for himself this repetition of the law into a book by the hands of the priests the Levites; and shall be with him, and he shall read it in all the days of his, that he may learn to fear the Lord thy God…(Deut. 17:18-20).

    There were no Davidic kings on the throne after the Babylonian exile.

    Theologically, Deuteronomy presents the Lord as God of the covenant, and God of history. All throughout Deuteronomy, which is essentially a sermon or exhortation as well as law, Moses urges Israel to choose a life of obedience to the law which God has given, with a strong emphasis on personal relationship, as Israel is urged to love God.

    This book introduces a new stress on the relationship with God when the phrase “Yahweh our God” is introduced and repeated; God’s people are never to approach law as a legalistic kind of thing, but to see the law covenant from the perspective of a personal relationship which already exists between God and His covenant people..

    With this in view, it is a little easier to see why our Lord Jesus referred to this particular book so much, and by quoting from Deuteronomy it would immediately recall to the Rabbinic Pharisee minds all of the Lord’s blessings and curses upon Israel recorded there as spoken by the Prophet Moses, as well as call to mind the great King Josiah, the reforming monarch of the house of David from which the Messiah was to come from.

    Our Lord, Who would not consent to or uphold any falsity concerning Scripture to begin with, does not quote proof texts without regard for their context, and the context would be equally known among the people of Israel. He is conscious of the context within which a saying is set, having steeped His mind in whole passages of Scripture.

    When Christ Jesus has to face the great crisis of His temptation, he answers the Devil three times by quotations from Scripture. The verses quoted are Deuteronomy 6:13 and 16, and 8:3. The first and fullest command to slaughter Canaanites comes in chapter 7. There is no room for doubt that our Lord regarded all three chapters as equally authoritative.
    Endorsement of God’s judgment of a more specific kind is to be found at a number of places in the New Testament, and it will be noted that, when the occupation of Canaan is referred to, it is thought of as a work of God, not as a product of the mind and the excessive zeal of man.

    Stephen speaks of ‘the nations which God thrust out before our fathers’ [and the implication in his preaching was “So also God will do to you if you do not repent from being the murderers and betrayers of the Just One, and seek His forgiveness and mercy]. Paul says, ‘The God of this people Israel … when he had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land as an inheritance.’ [implied again “So will God do to Israel if they do not repent. Xref Daniel 9:25-27]

    Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews speaks of the inhabitants of Canaan who perished as ‘those who were disobedient’ [as the Lord’s decreed judgment upon unfaithful, perfidous and disobedient Jerusalem ramped up in terms of God’s wrath.]. Then by way of solemn warning he takes up the description of God as ‘a consuming fire’ [separating the wheat from the tares] which was used by Moses, first in warning to the Israelites as they prepared to enter the Promised Land, and then with specific reference to God’s destruction of the Canaanites.

  84. Hoff May 30, 2009 @ 5:03 pm

    We @ RZN family need a break.

    “Enemy Number One (A DHS Inspired Song)”

  85. Michael K. May 31, 2009 @ 5:17 am

    Thanks KathJuliane,

    I think that perspective helps me to understand it better. It was a one time event, limited to these seven named tribes who had fallen into utter evil.

    Without hypocrisy, and according to the Golden Rule, I would regard it as just to exterminate ME if I was engaged in such loathsome vices.

    I notice that this commandment to wipe out utterly the Canaanites was not specifically directed against the “Amalekite.” And although the Amalekites were to be defeated, and their warriors put to the spear, there was no insistence on the death of their young too. A very interesting distinction. Perhaps they were not so debased religiously?

    Thanks again for you kind help, and may the Peace of Christ be with You.

  86. Balder July 14, 2009 @ 6:15 am

    Ivan the Terrible – Legal experts prophesize failure of Demjanjuk trial.

    Forensic evidence does not support the case – fatal errors by the prosecution.

    Translation of transcript from German TV program about the many loose ends in the prosecution’s case in the upcoming trial against alleged war criminal John Demjanjuk.

    Those who understand German, may wish to view the program in stead of reading the translated transcript. Video first broadcast on Monday June 8 2009, further down.

    Begin of transcript:

    Speak: Often a story begins like this: In mysterious ways a confidential note from the Bundes Kriminal Amt (BKA) [German Federal Police] ended on our desk.

    Read the rest here: Ivan the Terrible – Legal experts prophesize failure of Demjanjuk trial

  87. Druid March 1, 2010 @ 11:01 pm

    Hi Br. Nathanel,

    I’d like to know if you’re ever going to mention Jim Traficant one day?

    Even Alex Jones has invited him on his tv/radio show (great interview I must say), so I don’t see why you haven’t mentioned him.

    I find it somewhat strange that Alex Jones is criticized so much yet even he does mention the existence of this great man Jim Traficant.

    Yours Truly,


  88. Matthew C. Kriner April 13, 2011 @ 1:17 am


    Thanks for share. More wait . …

  89. Barb. Gerhard January 22, 2015 @ 7:36 pm

    He was found innocent by an Israeli high court.

    That’s amazing and these Zionists were still out for blood.

    What’s wrong with these people? The fact that Demyanyuk is innocent why did they accuse him to begin with? How did he come to their attention?

    These people must be stopped, they are just like rabid dogs that wont stop.

    They must have a reason to exist, and once there are no more so-called war criminals for them to hunt, they must justify their very existence by hunting down innocent people to keep the Jewish victim machine going.

    What came of this anyway?

    I never heard what happened to him, was he cleared, or convicted?

    The fact that he was an Orthodox Christian was this anything to do with him being persecuted?

    The Jewish religous leadership, and the so called respectable members of their community, have gone after the Christian community since the time of Jesus’ first disciples when they were going out to preach the Gospel.

    They always falsely accused them of doing wrong as they did to Jesus.

    But as Jesus did 2000 years ago, when He said Father forgive them, they know not what they do,

    So, as a Christian, I forgive them even though they do know exactly what they are doing.

    I feel sorry for them. In the end those who have not repented, will see who Jesus really is.

Leave a comment