Main Contents

Does The Media Run America?

Brother Nathanael Channel Videos!, BroVids, The Brother Report

Does The Media Run America?
October 16, 2018

YouTube Link

Mirrors In Comments

Watch On +BN’s Own Channel ‘Censor-Free!’ HERE!


More +BN Vids!

Trump’s Row With Google Here

Alex Jones Makes NYT Headlines Here

How The Media Fakes The News Here

The End Of White America Here

Will Trump Break The Media? Here

America’s Two Minutes Of Hate Here

The Damnation Of Confederate Memory Here

Why The Media Loves Antifa Here

The ADL’s War On White America Here

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Donate Via GoFundMe

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Support +BN On Patreon

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Brother Nathanael @ September 25, 2018


  1. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:28 pm


    Does The Media Run America?

    As pundits go Ann Coulter often can nail it.

    Talking about the Kavanaugh ‘crisis,’ she breaks it down beginning with a hammer on the right.

    [Clip: “I am giving everybody every benefit of every doubt. I’m not attacking Ford, who again, as I said last night who is a nice person. But this is a political tactic designed to prevent the President from putting his nominee in the court. Why are Republicans in the Congress playing along with this?” “Umm, I think some of them, and this is the only thing that I think makes it dangerous for Republicans, for Kavanaugh, and for the Republic because there are certain Republicans in the Senate who so hate Trump, umm, they would put their egos above the good of the country…”]

    The hammer strikes again: Who’s running America?

    [Clip: “I think your point, that if they get away with this, there, then you have CNN running the country. It’s not just the Democrats running the country, it’s the media running the country because this allegation can be made against anyone at anytime.”]

    CNN takes a hit.

    Owned by Turner Broadcasting, a division of AT&T’s WarnerMedia, its key players are Jeff Zucker, President of CNN; Doug Shapiro, Chief Strategist of Turner; and its President, David Levy.

    Now, if that’s not enough control in the hands of a chosen few, then when adding to the mix, Wolf Blitzer, Jacob Tapper, and John Berman, one wonders if perhaps a particular bias is shading CNN news.

    Is there an angle to be gained when dissevering reality from spin?

    Why is every news venue spotlighting outraged hacks reaming ‘old white Republican men’ for “bullying” Ford and “blaming the victim?”

    [Clip: “As long as you are a presumed white male Republican, whether it’s the Duke lacrosse case or that dastardly Haven Monahan, umm, in the Rolling Stones story about the frat boys gang raping the gal. The whole thing turned out to be a fake. There is no Haven Monahan. Umm or now a lot of the statements now about Brett Kavanaugh like from Krugman, ‘Oh, no, he’s smirking.’ Umm and a lot on Twitter and elsewhere, ‘Oh he’s a white male with white privilege.’ If you fit the narrative you are guilty and there’s no coming back from that.”]

    If you’re white, with traditional values, or a Constitutionalist judge that won’t budge when others try to fudge, then you fit the narrative and you’ll be crucified for it.

    Look for witnesses, false witnesses, just crucify the guy you hate…(they did it to Jesus Christ you know) and the all-powerful media invades your brains with a bias that’s hard to shake.

    Trump could stop it by nationalizing the press.

    Then bid out network venues on short term contracts to broadcasters having contrasting political and cultural views.

    That way, a diversification of discussion is secured.

    If not, we’re stuck with a chosen few pushing their own interests, resorting to mind manipulation that molds opinions, feelings, and suspicions.

    [Clip: “Brett Kavanaugh and the White House are denying new allegations from a second woman against the Supreme Court nominee. These allegations are published in the New Yorker, Deborah Ramirez, a class mate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale, says that Kavanaugh thrust his genitals in her face at a dorm party and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.”]

    Shades of ‘fake news.’

    At first off she wasn’t sure it was Kavanaugh because of “significant gaps in her memories.”

    But after 6 days with her Democrat lawyer, she decided, oh, it could only be him.

    And by Berman joining Kavanaugh’s denial with the White House…[Clip: “Brett Kavanaugh and the White House are denying new allegations”]…it makes Kavanaugh’s repudiation look like a ‘political’ ruse.

    Tell me, why didn’t Berman mention that Ramirez admitted she was stone drunk at the party?


    According to the Constitution, the Senate is to “advise and consent” on Supreme Court nominees, its concern, to discern if the candidate has the intellective qualifications and judicial experience to weigh crucial cases in the highest court of the land.

    It’s NOT to decide whether dormitory forays and loosely-strung accusations are pertinent to the process.

    And why, when all kinds of sexual mores are pushed these days—the press part of the push—is this same press in an uproar about teenage make-out parties some 36 years ago?

    I don’t see any other way out of the current trap of ‘media messaging’ other than Trump nationalizing the fake news industry.

    Traps are set for animals.

    It’s time we human beings set our own traps and clasp the media’s feet to the fire.

  2. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:29 pm

    Watch This NEW Video Worldwide & In All EU Countries CENSOR FREE:

    “Does The Media Run America?” @

    This is my STATE-OF-THE-ART Video Platform AND I OWN It! It Bypasses ALL Jew-Censorship.

    ALL Jew-Ruled EU Countries Can NOW View ALL My Vids Without JEW-CENSORSHIP! @

  3. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:29 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family,

    If you like my Videos & Articles please help me continue.

    Donate by GoFundMe (User Friendly!) @

    Donate by Click and Pledge @

    Bitcoin @

    MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael


    +Brother Nathanael Kapner @

  4. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:30 pm

    My Videos Are ALSO Posted Here! @

  5. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:31 pm

    Kick Off Moves Ahead!

    GoFundMe +BN Campaign! @

    Donate Via GoFundMe

    Let’s Keep A Good Thing Going!

  6. Brother Nathanael September 25, 2018 @ 12:32 pm

    Follow +BN On Twitter! Daily Tweets! @

  7. Albert September 25, 2018 @ 2:03 pm


    I gave up watching TV 40 years ago.

    Blessings to all.


  8. Cornelius September 25, 2018 @ 5:48 pm

    Spot on!

    I also don’t watch Jew propaganda, but I give Brother Nathanael credit for fighting the Jews.

    He has to watch it to show the goyim so he can wake up the dormant anti Semite in them.

  9. Citizenfitz September 25, 2018 @ 8:14 pm

    I’m of the opinion that the MSM is actually more powerful than the US military. It powerfully (misin)forms people’s thoughts. And it’s certain they particularly target women – like Berlin on a clear, blue day.

    But it’s equally clear this MSM is losing it’s hold on our minds – and their recourse to fakery proves it.

  10. KathJuliane September 25, 2018 @ 8:15 pm

    God bless you, dear +BN and thank you for a very outstanding Video.

    The Dwindling Looney Radical Left Soros Freak Show Circus Continues.

    Under the ultimate umbrella of Soros-funded lead shell organization Demand Justice, protestors, male, female, and whatever, prowling the halls of Congress with Soros cash in their pockets to cover petty fines for arrests, were sporting the antifa look by wearing black in solidarity with new 15-minute Demoncrat folk hero, Christine Blasey Ford, and chanting “Believe the Women”.

    So where’s the Democrat specialty victims’ boohoo party for the straight, white, American men and boys who who are battered, mentally and emotionally abused, and sexually violated by predatory and vindictive women, but the incidents go far more unreported than by female victims, or else the MSM buries any publicity about such cases?


    ABC: Kavanaugh protests escalate, over 120 arrested on Capitol Hill

    National protests against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh escalated on Monday with more than 120 people arrested on Capitol Hill, celebrities weighing in on social media, and nationwide walkouts.

    Capitol Hill police said 128 people were arrested for “unlawfully demonstrating” outside of senators’ offices and in the main rotunda of the Russell Senate Building. About half as many protesters were arrested for protesting Kavanaugh on Thursday.

    The protests were organized by various groups, including the Women’s March, Planned Parenthood, NARAL and others who strongly oppose Kavanaugh’s nomination.

    The surge in opposition to Trump’s pick for the high court comes one day after a second woman came forward with a new sexual misconduct allegation.

    Around the same time as the majority of the arrests, walkouts were also taking place in workplaces and schools around the country – including at Yale – by women and men wearing black.

    Protesters largely targeted senators who are key to Kavanaugh’s potential confirmation to the Supreme Court.

    Republican Sen. Susan Collins, who said Friday she remained undecided, had protesters outside her office Monday morning, as did another undecided Republican, Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona.

    Many protesters also crowded the office of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, the Republican senator from Iowa.

    They shared their own stories of sexual assault and called on senators to stand with survivors.



    Albert, dear friend, 40 years without TV!

    I killed mine about 25 years ago when I converted to Orthodoxy, and was living off the grid in North California.

    No wonder you have such creative energy and keen insights, it’s not siphoned off in a passive, TV-induced stupor.

    God grant you many more years of TV-free life!

  11. Citizenfitz September 25, 2018 @ 8:17 pm

    Albert, 40 years without TV?

    I bend the knee.

  12. KathJuliane September 25, 2018 @ 9:44 pm

    Of value to Christians and everyone else

    Orthodoxy and the Effects of Television

    The spiritual, psychological and ecological effects of television viewing and how these influence parishioners and their ability to address issues of creation

    Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. – Proverbs 22:6

    “Television has done us great damage. It’s especially destructive for children.” – Elder Paisios of Mount Athos

    “Satan has persuaded man to arrange his entire lifestyle so that there is no quiet time, no time for contemplating the past day, week or month. Everything is occupied with entertainment. And in this system of entertainment, television is given the privileged place of honor.

    The lion’s share of free time is ‘eaten up’ by it, that idol of contemporary civilization. I would call it a cruel despot and tyrant to whom the greater part of mankind is subject in a servitude never before witnessed in the world. – Elder Anthony of Russia

    THE SAINTS, THE FATHERS AND THE ELDERS OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH teach that the physical senses are the doorways to the soul.

    This is why spiritually alert Orthodox Christians emphasize the need for great care in avoiding occasions of sin, the viewing of foul or defiling images, and especially any absorption of images or situations that convey violence, lurid scenes, or depictions of depravity (cf. 1 John 2:16).

    In recent decades Orthodox monastic elders have provided an insightful and necessary commentary on how television viewing degrades the soul and inhibits the ability of otherwise faithful church-going people from building up their spiritual life.

    While their commentary may not be comprehensive, they sound a warning of how a soul-degrading character exists in the medium of television.

    In this regard Elder Anthony of Russia says that television induces a hypnotic effect in which a person loses an ability to think for him- or herself, to perceive in a thoughtful manner the events that are happening, or to form one’s own world view. These offenses, he writes, go deep, especially in young people, and have permanent effects.

    In a similar way, Saint Ignatius Brianchaninov, before the era of television, observes that wrong fixations or sinful experiences while young have long lasting effects because of the depth of the wound to the soul.

    Archbishop Vitaly from the former Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia adds that it is urgent for Orthodox to address the problem of television.

    “Television… has managed to secure a niche for itself in almost every home. Its powers of persuasion and attraction have proved to be practically supernatural and are coupled with a subtle and awesome ability to corrupt. …

    Without exaggeration, a campaign against it must be our immediate and primary concern because every day and every hour its effects are being felt in our own homes.”

    Research in several thousand university studies makes clear that from the standpoints of educational performance, physiological development, the ability to relax, the development of cooperative social behavior, and even, as Saint Theophan the Recluse observes regarding the formation of spiritual attitudes, television can be judged as a significant and seriously damaging influence in childhood development.

    Dr. Cheryl Pawlowski, Ph.D., a researcher at the University of Northern Colorado, determined after exhaustive study that television is a significant retarding force in allowing young people to grasp abstract or complex information.

    Kate Moody in a summary of hundreds of studies for The New York Times found much more. Her research revealed that habitual television viewing by young people goes deep and affects their basic outlook on life and shapes their lifelong sensibilities. It lessens imagination and ability to play; it distorts language patterns and perceptions of others. It predisposes many of them to violence, anti social behavior, and hyperactivity.

    It lowers IQ scores, and it affects their self-image. Just a little bit of casual TV watching produces an alteration of brain waves; it also reduces critical eye movements which narrows peripheral vision.


    Also see:


    Of course, the vast interlocking monopolistic networks of Big Corporate Media know the science of this and how to manipulate the brain using TV and other screen time to bypass the rational areas of the brain processing thought and going straight for the visual/emotional centers, as do Big Social Media, and the radical left Lavender-Red-Antifa-Regressive activist organizations and think tanks.

    It’s sometimes surprising just what lemmings the loony left radicals are, stuck in their ultra-conformist group-think all wearing the same t-shirts and clothing to show “solidarity”, while screaming that they are free individuals.

    Along similar lines, Silicon Valley industry leaders and parents in general are limiting and curbing screen time and raising low-tech kids.

    Search for ‘Silicon Valley Parents + Low Tech Kids

  13. KathJuliane September 25, 2018 @ 10:19 pm


    The Senate Democrats are screaming for FBI reports. Unless the White House specifically requests it, the FBI won’t conduct any investigations because none of the accusations involve federal employees and agencies, nor occurred on federal property.

    The lunatic left scores own goal cream pie square in the face after curious, investigative folks pushing back against CNN and regressive Democrats in and out of Congress dug this one out of the CSPAN archives.

    Great find. Spewing right out of the snarky and condescending mouth of Creepy-hands Biden himself at the 1991 Clarence Thomas hearing:


    Biden Already Set The Standard For Democrats: FBI Reports NOT Acceptable For Use In Committee Hearings

    Then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) said during the confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991 that FBI reports were useless because the “FBI explicitly does not, in this or any other case reach a conclusion, period.”

    The clip has resurfaced as Senate Democrats are desperately trying to delay the confirmation vote for current Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh after allegations of sexual misconduct were recently made from over 30 years ago — without evidence or corroborating witnesses.

    “The reason why I have worked so hard to keep FBI reports totally secret is because they have little or no probative weight, because they are hearsay,” Biden said.

    “The FBI does their interviews by walking up to person A and saying will you speak to us, and the guarantee is anonymity. That is what the FBI tells the person, and the FBI speaks to the person.

    “Now, for us to summarily go back and say, as a matter of policy, that we are going to break the commitment the Federal Government makes to an individual, in order to get that individual to cooperate in an investigation, is disastrous.”

    “And the last thing I will point out, the next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything, obviously doesn’t understand anything,” Biden later said.

    “FBI explicitly does not, in this or any other case reach a conclusion, period, period. So, Judge, there is no reason why you should know this. The reason why we cannot rely on the FBI report, you would not like it if we did because it is inconclusive.

    “They say he said, she said, and they said, period. So when people wave an FBI report before you, understand they do not, they do not reach conclusions. They do not make, as my friend points out more accurately, they do not make recommendations.”


  14. Ted Gorsline September 25, 2018 @ 10:27 pm

    Government owned media like the BBC and CBC in Canada are as susceptible to bribes as anyone.

    That is why both the CBC and BBC are Jewish gate keepers.

    The media should be broken into as many competitive pieces as possible. The internet was a good start but the Jew boys are trying to censor the internet now.

    Liberty depends on the distribution of power. That is the basis of the Magna Carta and the US Constitution.

    Centralization of power such a current Jewish control of media or creation of communism is always the enemy of the people.

    The Jews are the enemies of the people. Its very clear. Its chiseled in stone.

    Its so clear and obvious that the Mossad, Israel, that organized crime centre (Israel is not a nation) did 9/11.

    That is a declration of war on the USA and America’s leaders have made no response.

    This non-reaction is the greatest and most vile example of cowardice in world history.

    There is no American exceptionalism. There are only Jewish bribes.

    It started with 30 piece of silver and continues to this very day.

  15. Ted Gorsline September 25, 2018 @ 11:44 pm


    CBC news, for years, was headed up by a New York state Jew ( Wolf Blitzer’s bailiwick) named Barbara Frum. Her son is David Frum who coined the term “axis of evil” as a speech writer for Bush Jr.

    Allegedly Frum suffers from a disease of journalists called “Downing’s syndrome”.

    It was first diagnosed at the Toronto Sun and the symtoms are your entire life’s body of work, 8,500 columns in all, was completely forgotten within seconds of the ink drying on your last column.

    David Frum comes from the National Post where as a columnist he never wrote anything worth reading. This led to his promotion as an editor at Atlantic Magazine and to being a CNN commentator.

    He ranks right up there with Woodworth and Bernstein as a stenographer. I don’t think he ever broke a single hard news story in his life. Just the usual Jewish smear jobs such as you see on CNN every day.

    I believe the Jewish takeover of CBC came when it was headed up by Jew boy Mark Starowitz (spelling may be wrong). The CBC is just the propaganda arm for Bnai Brith.

    CNN should get out of the new business and open whore house. They have already got the right staff in place. No need to advertise for more.

    Some of the women need work but a good surgeon could cut the nerves between Rosemary Church’s mouth and her eyebrows so she didn’t raise her eyebrows every time she opens her mouth. He could also reduce the size of Christian Anampurs knobbly, Eli Wallach, nose, before it splits into three parts.

    If you suck up to the Jewish money sufficiently as a CBC journalist you can get a cushy job after retirement teaching Jewish shill journalism at the Monk Center.

    Peter Monk is Nate Rothschild’s business partner at Barrick Gold /Kahama mines in Tanzania.

  16. Brother Nathanael September 26, 2018 @ 4:11 am


    New Website Coming:

    “The Brother Report!”

    A Boutique Version Of InfoWars

    Alex Jones must decrease but +Brother Nathanael must increase

    Gonna bring the internet house down with a special niche click on!

    Help Me Fund This Exciting Development!

    GoFundMe (User Friendly!) @

    Click and Pledge @

    Bitcoin @

    MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael


  17. Brother Nathanael September 26, 2018 @ 4:12 am

    Momentous Notice!

    +Brother Nathanael NOW Taking Radio Interview Requests!

    Email me @


    It’s a whole new ballgame!

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner @
    2018 Update Coming Soon

  18. KathJuliane September 26, 2018 @ 1:18 pm

    Oh, boy. A third accusation was finally ginned up by Avenatti and published in the Media after two days of keeping hardly anyone in suspense, in the form of a sworn affidavit by his client, Julie Swetnick.

    In it, she has not even accused Kavanaugh of actually doing anything to her personally.

    Julie Swetnick she claims Kavanaugh was part of a group of boys who sexually assaulted girls (“gang raped”) during “at least ten” high school parties that she attended.

    From the New York Times:

    Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh was accused Wednesday by another woman of having engaged in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s.

    The allegation came from Julie Swetnick, 55, who like Judge Kavanaugh, 53, grew up in the Washington suburbs. In a statement posted on Twitter by her lawyer, Ms. Swetnick said she observed the future Supreme Court nominee at parties where women were verbally abused, inappropriately touched, made “disoriented” with alcohol or drugs, and “gang raped.”

    She said she witnessed Judge Kavanaugh participating in some of the misconduct, including lining up outside a bedroom where “numerous boys” were “waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room.” Ms. Swetnick said she was raped at one of the parties, and she believed she had been drugged.

    None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.

    Ms. Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., graduating from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending college at the University of Maryland, according to a résumé for her posted online.

    Judge Kavanaugh graduated from Georgetown Prep in 1983.

    In her statement, Ms. Swetnick wrote that she met Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Judge in 1980 or 1981 when she was introduced to them at a house party in the Washington area.

    She saw them to be “extremely close friends” who were “consistently” together at social gatherings. She said she attended at least 10 house parties in the Washington area from 1981 to 1983 where the two were present. She said the parties were common, taking place almost every weekend during the school year.”

    What’s wrong with this picture?

    Swetnick graduated in 1980. Kavanaugh graduated in 1983, so there’s at least two, and more like three years’ age difference.

    1980-1981, the term following Swetnick’s graduation from high school at about 17 1/2 to 18 years old, was Kavanaugh’s sophomore year, and he was 15-16 years old.

    1981-1982 would be Kavanaugh’s junior year, and 1982-1983 his senior year of high school. He graduated at 18, and Swetnick would be about 21.

    So what Swetnick is saying in her sworn statement is that she was a college-age adult going to drug-laced drinking “gang-rape” parties with 15-18 year olds — repeatedly.

    To recap the Avenatti claim, a woman states that when she was a college aged adult (graduated high school in 1980), she went to high school parties again and again where high school girls were drugged and gang-raped and she, as the adult present, did nothing but avoid the punch.

    Call me crazy and old fashioned, but Swetnick has to answer why the hell she kept going back to “at least ten” of those parties, where she as an adult freely may (or may not) have had sex with minors, and during one party where she herself wound up “gang raped”?

    She states she attended these parties between 1981 to 1983. She states she was gang raped in 1982. She continued to go to these parties after she was raped? Why would you go back to a place where you were raped like that?

    She also has to answer why she didn’t call the police if such heinous crimes were going on. Even as far back in the 1980s, adults that don’t report sex crimes against children and minors is actually a crime in many states.

    And, since these parties she states she personally knew involved teenagers as young as 15, since Swetnick was a college-age adult between 18-21 years of age during the three years of parties she claims she saw Kavanaugh at, isn’t there something about contributing to the delinquency of minors she should be concerned about?

    Did Swetnick inadvertently admit she committed a crime or crimes herself?

    Anyway, Swetnick doesn’t accuse Kavanaugh in her affidavit of personally doing anything to her. She only states he was present at these unnamed parties she attended with no given locations or addresses other than “the Washington DC area,” and no other “victims” have come forward on this third allegation to do the #MeToo thing with Avinatti and Swetnick.

    The most glaring question is why she only seems to remember Kavanaugh and Judge. She makes no claim that Kavanaugh raped her, yet she is only focused on Kavanaugh.

    Just another smear ginned up by sleaze-bag Avinatti who is trying to garner some political traction about a 2020 presidential run.

    As the New York Times wrote: “None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.”

    As far as the second round of hijacked #MeToo filthy smears goes (which was entirely designed by the virtue-signalling regressive Democrats to get the dreaded fire-breathing penis-monster out there, brandished as news media pornography by the Media in the face of the Puritanical public mind in order to scare the women, children, and horses), according to Townhall:

    “…Kavanaugh’s second sexual abuse accuser, Deborah Ramirez, will not testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    According to Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), a member of the Committee, said he spoke with Ramirez. She made it very clear that she gave her story to the press, which can be found in The New Yorker article that was posted late Sunday night, The Washington Times reported.

    “Our counsel repeatedly tried to reach him,” Kennedy said. “They finally did reach him, and he said we are not issuing a statement. He said if you want our statement, read the New Yorker.”

    Ramirez has a sign outside of her Boulder, Colorado home saying she will not speak to the press. Anyone member of the press who would like more information is encouraged to call her lawyer.

    Senators who are on the fence about confirming Kavanaugh, like Susan Collins (R-ME), say they want to hear from Ramirez.

    The first step in that process would be Ramirez testifying in front of the Committee, The Washington Examiner reported.

    Judge Kavanaugh’s response to the third smear was “This is ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone.” Indeed.

  19. The Odd Duck September 26, 2018 @ 3:41 pm


    The 80’s Sex, Drugs, and Rock n Roll.

  20. The Odd Duck September 26, 2018 @ 3:45 pm

    Deborah Ramirez, a class mate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale, says that Kavanaugh thrust his genitals in her face at a dorm party and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.

    This possible mean that Ramirez was on her knees at the time or Kavanaugh was on a table or chair at the time.

  21. Albert September 26, 2018 @ 4:28 pm


    “you bend the knee”?

    That’s hilarious……’ve made my day !

  22. Brother Nathanael September 26, 2018 @ 5:53 pm


    Trump called Avanetti a “con artist” and a “low life.” He also said with regard to all the accusations against Kavanaugh that “there’s nothing to investigate.” Bravo Mr President!

  23. Shell Shocked September 26, 2018 @ 5:56 pm

    Speaking of FBI reports, I found a copy of the one about the “dancing Israelis” but can no longer find the site where I got it or it has been taken off the internet.

    At the time, much of it was heavily redacted, but I verified some of the most critical information I was interested in from it.

    It may have been cited on RJN multiple times.

    There is one photo they released from a camera containing a roll of film they processed, the one with the lighter held by one of the Israelis with what was left of the Towers in the far background.

    What is relevant to this article about the media, this quote is not attributable to any of the five detained Israelis but another non-Jewish man who was employed by Urban Moving but couldn’t take their anti-American talk any more so quit the job.

    The FBI tracked him down and interviewed him, the quote:

    The man said that “an Israeli employee of Urban had once remarked, ‘Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country.'”

    It seems like they’ve more or less taken over with the big ones. And I would like to add that what is left on TV and radio for conservatives, you can’t bring up anything about Israel or Jews even if it’s true. There have been a few exceptions, very few. One afternoon not too long ago one got through the screener on a wide-audience talk show, and he was promptly cut off.

    The media has an incredible amount of influence and opinion shapers (including the print media) and has had for most of the years since I was born.

  24. Zionien September 26, 2018 @ 7:52 pm

    Feet to the fire – The Jew is a liar!
    Sacrificing their own
    to discredit Kavanaugh, Esquire.

    Crazy liar, “no one is higher”
    than a Jew worm would deceive to aspire.
    But they are forever in the mire+
    Their situation is dire!!!:/

    If control is not established – who will be their sire..?
    For a lowly scum of the earth
    people who deny Jesus Christ – they will be the crier!+

    For it’s become quite obvious & lame
    their go to game to shame and to blame -it’s just more of the same.
    To cry and lie
    no matter who die
    will barely, if ever raise their pitiful sigh!

    Amazing that no one has ever tried to whack that mohel Soros!

  25. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 3:04 am

    Adding to the crazy situation and fast times of Capitol Hill High


    Inside the squirrel cage for what it’s worth:

    Fox News: Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh (6 hours ago)

    As an extraordinary series of uncorroborated, lurid last-minute allegations threatens to derail his confirmation to the Supreme Court, nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Ford, the California professor accusing him of sexually assaulting her more than three decades ago, are set to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday morning.

    The proceedings may be upended by late-breaking developments: In a statement released Wednesday evening, Judiciary Committee Republicans revealed that on Monday, they conducted their “first interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his [sic] complaint.” They conducted a second interview the next day.

    On Wednesday, Republicans said in the statement, they received a “more in-depth written statement from the man interviewed twice previously who believes he, not Judge Kavanuagh, had the encounter in question with Dr. Ford.” GOP investigators also spoke on the phone with another man making a similar claim.

    Ford has previously said there is “zero chance” she would have confused Kavanaugh for anyone else.

    In response, an aide to Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reportedly unloaded on Senate Republicans: “Republicans are flailing,” the aide said, according to NBC News. “They are desperately trying to muddy the waters. … Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted her. Democrats were never informed of these assertions in interviews, in violation of Senate rules.”

    The aide, before again calling for an FBI probe into Ford’s accusations, added, “This is shameful and the height of irresponsibility.”

    But Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, shot back on Twitter late Wednesday, writing, “Some might find it exceedingly difficult to imagine Judiciary Committee Democrats expressing this complaint with straight faces.”


    Schumer: “There Is No Presumption Of Innocence” For Kavanaugh

    During a press conference on Capitol Hill, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says that “there is no presumption of innocence” for Judge Brett Kavanaugh.


    And a surprise: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Criticizes Treatment Of Kavanaugh During SCOTUS Hearings, “Highly Partisan Show”

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg criticizes how Judge Brett Kavanaugh was treated during his SCOTUS confirmation hearings. Discussing the modern Supreme Court confirmation process, Ginsburg called the hearings a “highly partisan show” and “wrong” while speaking at the George Washington University Law School on 9/12/18.

  26. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 3:31 am

    Results of the polygraph summary?

    Blasey Ford believes her own written statement.

    From Jeremiah P Hanifan’s Polygraph Examination Report:

    Following this interview, Blasey was given a polygraph examination consisting of the following relevant questions:

    A. Is any part of your statement false? Answer: No

    B. Did you make up any part of your statement? Answer: No.


    Accuser #3, Swetnick “with Jewish roots” per Avenatti to Forward Magazine, and Accuser #1 Blasey Ford have a direct connection through Debra Katz. What are the odds?

    Rebecca Ballhaus
    ‏Verified account

    [WSJ reporter]

    New: A decade ago, Julie Swetnick made a sexual harassment complaint against her former employer, New York Life Insurance. Representing her was the firm run by Debra Katz, who now reps Christine Blasey Ford. She was ultimately paid a financial settlement. ( …

    Wall Street Journal: (buried in) New Claims Add Fuel to Showdown Over Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh

    “Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford. The company ultimately reached a financial settlement with Ms. Swetnick, the people said.

    A spokesman for New York Life confirmed that Ms. Swetnick worked there as an agent for less than two years, from 2006 to 2008. She didn’t list her work there on a résumé posted online.

    A spokeswoman for Ms. Katz declined to comment.


    So basically Debra Katz said, “Hey I know just the right person who would be perfect as the next victim!”


    National Review: Fifth Kavanaugh Accuser Recants

    A Rhode Island man who accused Brett Kavanaugh of raping a “close associate of his” on a boat in 1985 recanted just hours after the claims were made public Wednesday.

    The accuser, [anti-Trumper] Jeff Catalan, called the office of Representative Sheldon White House of Rhode Island “making allegations concerning a rape on a boat in August of 1985,” according to transcripts of a call between committee staff and Kavanaugh released on Wednesday.

    Catalan, who recanted the allegation Wednesday afternoon on Twitter, initially claimed his friend “was sexually assaulted by two heavily inebriated men she referred to at the time as Brett and Mark,” referencing Kavanaugh and his Georgetown Prep classmate, Mark Judge.

    Judiciary Committee staff redacted Catalan’s name in a transcript of their call with Kavanaugh but quoted several of his tweets, allowing reporters to identify him.

    Jeffrey Catalan

    Do everyone who is going crazy about what I had said I have recanted because I have made a mistake and apologize for such mistake

    6:51 PM – Sep 26, 2018


    D-bddbdbd-Dats all folks!

  27. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 4:24 am

    Forward Magazine (excerpts): Who Is Julie Swetnick, New Kavanaugh Accuser With Jewish Roots?

    Aiden Pink Sep 26, 2018

    A Jewish woman who is a longtime federal employee has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct at “train rape” parties when they were both in high school, the third woman to level accusations against him in recent weeks.

    Julie Swetnick claims in a sworn affadavit that she was a victim of “gang rapes” at parties frequented by Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge in high school, lawyer Michael Avenatti tweeted Wednesday.

    “She reached out to me for representation and yes she is Jewish,” Avenatti told the Forward via email.

    Swetnick graduated from public high school in Gaithersburg, Maryland, a Washington D.C. suburb with a significant Jewish population near Kavanaugh’s childhood home.

    Swetnick’s aunt Helene Moglen is a prominent Jewish feminist and literary scholar at University of California at Santa Cruz. Reached by phone on Wednesday, Moglen said “we’re too busy right now” and hung up.

    Swetnick is the granddaughter of Russian immigrants Joseph and Bella Moglen. Joseph Moglen was a Yiddish-speaking jewelry store worker, a socialist trade union activist and “working class intellectual” from Crown Heights, Brooklyn.

    Their daughter Elaine Moglen Swetnick, Julie’s mother, graduated from Hunter College and worked for the Atomic Energy Commission, according to her obituary.

    Julie Swetnick’s 95-year-old father, Martin, is a retired NASA physicist. Julie Swetnick has two siblings, Adam and Susan.

    Julie Swetnick is an information technology specialist and a longtime federal contractor with active clearances with the Treasury Department, IRS and U.S. Mint, according to her affidavit. Supporters point out that she could lose her clearance if she is found to have lied in a sworn affidavit.

    Martin Swetnick told the Washington Post he was shocked to hear that his daughter was in the headlines. He admitted he had long fallen out of touch with all of his children.

    “The only time we communicate is on my birthday when she sends me an email,” Swetnick said.

    The elderly father called Julie Swetnick a good high school student and said she never mentioned being sexually abused by Kavanaugh or anyone else.

    “Maybe we were poor parents,” he told the Post. “She lived her life. We didn’t discuss it.”

    Read more (paywall):

  28. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 5:08 am

    Politico: Ex-boyfriend filed restraining order against third Kavanaugh accuser

    By MARC CAPUTO and NATASHA KORECKI 09/26/2018 08:05 PM EDT

    Julie Swetnick, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a friend of attending house parties where women — including herself — were sexually assaulted, had a restraining order filed against her years later in Miami by her former boyfriend.

    A Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who told POLITICO Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up.

    Thirteen days later, the case was dismissed, not long after an affidavit of non-ability to advance fees was filed.

    According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

    “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. “I know a lot about her.”

    “She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”

    The allegation is likely to raise questions among Republican defenders of Kavanaugh about Swetnick’s credibility after her attorney Michael Avenatti revealed her for the first time on Wednesday.

    Reached late Wednesday, Avenatti said he knew nothing of a restraining order and called the line of inquiry irrelevant.

    “Complete nonsense. No truth to this at all. Her ex-boyfriend fraudulently used her resume to apply for and obtain jobs and was caught by her,” said Avenatti. “Why are you all attacking a sexual assault victim? Would that be appropriate in a court of law?”

    Citing the sensitive nature of the case and the explosive politics surrounding it, Vinneccy said he wanted to talk to an attorney first before further discussing the case, which has kept him occupied all day.

    “My phone has not stopped since this morning. Everyone is calling,” Vinneccy said.

    Vinneccy, 63, is a registered Democrat, according to Miami-Dade County voting records.

    Swetnick was identified on Wednesday by Avenatti, who produced a sworn statement asserting that she met Kavanaugh in the 1980-1981 time period and subsequently attended more than 10 house parties where she said Kavanaugh and a close friend of his, Mark Judge, attended.

    Swetnick does not accuse Kavanaugh himself of sexually assaulting her in the sworn statement. But she asserts Kavanaugh was present when she was the victim of a “gang rape” by multiple boys at one party.

    Vinneccy made clear that he did not believe her story.

    “I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more.”

    Avenatti said called the reporting “outrageous” and accused the press of “digging into the past” of a woman who stepped forward and is willing to testify under oath.

    “I am disgusted by the fact that the press is attacking a sexual assault victim,” Avenatti said.

    When asked if the allegation of a restraining order were true, Avenatti said: “I don’t know one way or another,” adding he would research it further.

    Avenatti previously said he had vetted the client and in a sworn statement, she said she still held government clearances.


    Daily Signal: EXCLUSIVE: Female High School Friend of Kavanaugh Says Latest Allegation ‘False,’ ‘Absurd’

    A woman and friend who knew Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh as a high school student says allegations of sexual misconduct from a third accuser are “false.”

    “This claim is absolutely false and absurd,” Meghan McCaleb, a friend of Kavanaugh’s since high school, told The Daily Signal of allegations from Julie Swetnick, which were made public Wednesday.

    Gaithersburg High is a public school in Montgomery County, Maryland, about 10 miles north of Georgetown Prep, the private school Kavanaugh attended.

    “We never hung out with anyone from Gaithersburg High School, there was never any drug use at our parties, and the fact that she is coming out and saying that is such an insult to Brett and to all of us,” McCaleb said.

    Normally, private prep students and public school students traveled in mutually exclusive circles. This was almost a universal fact of life when I was growing up, it wasn’t different a decade later.

  29. Albert September 27, 2018 @ 10:33 am


    Thanks very much for your TV comment and encouragement.

    Blessings *

  30. Ted Gorsline September 27, 2018 @ 1:02 pm

    What is going on at CNN is all in the Talmud.

    Its OK to lie to and murder non Jews.

    CNN does it every day. The rabbis teach them the rules.

  31. Citizenfitz September 27, 2018 @ 2:09 pm

    Today is the fourth anniversary of Congressman Jim Trafficant’s peculiar death.

    He crossed the Tribe and they railroaded him into prison.

    He was a brave and forthright man… and those attributions are not tolerated in Congressmen.

    Spare a prayer for him.

  32. Citizenfitz September 27, 2018 @ 2:19 pm

    Albert, glad to know I made your day. Like you, I too have been Talmudvision free… but only seventeen years.

    I gave it up for Lent way back then. When I turned it back on it annoyed… even repulsed me. I’m now convinced it turns people’s brains into radioactive trash.

    Haven’t turned one on since 2001!

  33. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 2:23 pm

    RT: Mysterious envelope slip from Dem-Rep to Ford’s attorney caught on VIDEO at Kavanaugh hearings

    US Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee was caught on video slipping an envelope to Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney during hearings on accusations against the SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh, triggering a wave of speculation on its contents.

    The envelope slip was very brief and quite secretive, yet it did not escape the cameras.

    The mysterious transfer prompted speculations on what exactly was inside the envelope, with the leading – and obvious – theory it contained a wad of cash.

    The manner in which the attorney handled the envelope, putting it straight into his pocket without even looking, prompted some questions as well.

    Some people, however, assumed the package contained something more personal than a bunch of Federal Reserve notes.

    “Simply, what was passed were unopened stationery notes to counsel for Dr. Ford from women who wanted to enter the hearing room but were not allowed to enter the hearing room,” the congresswoman’s press office has said.

  34. Citizenfitz September 27, 2018 @ 3:16 pm

    James Corbett’s outstanding expose, “Century of Enslavement: The History of the Federal Reserve” has just gotten de-ranked by JooToob.

    Over 1.6 million views the past four years. It used to head the list when you searched, “Federal Reserve” there. Now you must type “Century of Enslavement….” to see it. Meanwhile “Federal Reserve” videos with one thousandth the number of views are front and center at JooToob.

    Yep, soft censorship is definitely here.

    Soon to be followed by hard censorship.

    Then midnight arrests….

  35. KathJuliane September 27, 2018 @ 4:31 pm

    C-SPAN Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Sexual Assault Hearing, Part 3

    Dr. Ford revealed an interesting link to Diane Feinstein’s office.

    19:21 Ms. Mitchell, asking on behalf of Senator Tillis, asks Dr. Ford if she had help choosing her lawyers.

    She said she got advice from people she knows in the D.C. area to get referrals, and got suggestions from Feinstein’s staff.

    Feinstein’s staff referred Dr. Ford to Katz and Burns along with other attorney possibilities.

  36. Zionien September 27, 2018 @ 6:47 pm

    Just watched the Kavanaugh hearing – What a JOKE!

    I didn’t believe a word with that “baby girl” “victim” tone that Blasey Ford pig said!

    She was OBVIOUSLY coached! One minute she’s trying to muster a tear, the next she’s joking via her egocentric technical terms, words, comments!

    Wow – what a total LOSER she is. FOR SHAME – FOR SHAME SHAME on Diane FienStain – that witch!

    I hope she gets wrapped up in this to the point she losses her CA. election that 84+ yr old Wormy Hag!

  37. Zionien September 27, 2018 @ 8:15 pm

    Liberahole minded people with their montra of “Do as I say, & I’ll do as I want”

    People are incredibly – INCREDIBLY easily brainwashed/manipulated – FOOLS!

    This has most CERTAINLY turned into a Nation of braindead “if you listen to fools – the mob rules” Zombies!

  38. KathJuliane September 28, 2018 @ 12:42 am

    Washington Examiner: Who abused Ford (and Kavanaugh)? It was the Democrats

    Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh came to the Senate Judiciary Committee with emotional and powerful testimony on Thursday. Ford told a story of trauma and bravery. Kavanaugh brought outrage and righteous anger.

    The anger and suffering of both had the same just cause — the disgusting perfidy of Senate Democrats. The party of the Left has shown that there is no calumny it will not retail, no false or uncorroborated allegation it will not use to whip up ideological passions, and no depths to which it will not stoop to win and hold power.

    Let’s hope voters look at the noisome spectacle that has just taken place on Capitol Hill and deliver a resounding rebuke to the people who perpetrated it.

    Their behavior during the Kavanaugh confirmation process outstrips even the disgraceful conduct of their partisan forebears at the confirmation hearings for Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. Thursday was a black day, capping a period of bleak weeks in the history of American governance.

    Let us focus on just one striking moment and Ford’s answers to two questions from Republican lawyer Rachel Mitchell. The prosecutor, who conducted herself with gentleness, respect, and restraint, asked Ford to whom she had given her letter accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

    [Rachel Mitchell, a matronly, kindly, highly experienced and educated sexual crimes prosecutor from Arizona, did a great job depoliticizing the entire affair and pulling the fangs of the Democrats, serving as the public countenance of the “11 old white men” Republic majority of the Judiciary Committee, and the oral conduit for asking their prewritten questions of Ford.

    No one, (but the lousy Democrats) can honestly say that Mitchell was too hard on Ford. They can’t say that the “11 old white Republican men” bullied Ford. Because gender means more than truth these days, she was merely occupying what would have been the normal rotation of Republican senators asking the same questions should they choose to defer to her. Race and maleness was a disqualifier, so most of them gave the floor to Mitchell.

    Mitchell’s role pleased none of the critics on all sides (including herself, where she clearly stated that if it were up to her, Ford would have been questioned in private and not in a highly charged public venue in 5 minute bursts) which means she must have done precisely the job she was requested to do. Mitchell was empathetic and calming, and got all of the answers for the Republicans wrote questions for. — Kj]

    Under oath, Ford made it clear that her lawyers, plus Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., were the only people to whom she sent the letter. Ford had chosen her lawyer, Debra Katz, on Feinstein’s recommendation.

    So how did her letter leak to the news media? The likeliest explanation is that Katz or Feinstein did the leaking, even though Ford had explicitly asked them not to share it. Ford made it clear in her testimony that she went to the Washington Post reporter only after the story began to leak and reporters began walking into her house to question her.

    These reporters were sicced onto Ford by whoever leaked her story. It seems that Katz dragged her own client, or Feinsten dragged a sexual assault victim for whom she expressed crocodile concern, into a political maelstrom for entirely cynical ends.

    If Katz and Feinstein had wanted to protect Ford, they could have made sure her allegation was investigated confidentially rather than in the horror circus of the Senate hearing room where she was, by her own admission, terrified.

    [Feinstein, squirming uncomfortably after the Republicans, especially Graham and his epic rant, turned the hot spotlight turned on her about the leaked letter, she then attempted to use Ford, her own constituent, as a human shield and blamed the letter leak on Ford by saying that she had spoken to some friends.

    Guilty is as guilty does. That doesn’t explain how the letter was leaked to the press. Ford may have spoken to friends, but they did not have, nor leaked, the actual letter, the chain of possession being from Ford to Feinstein first, and from Ford or Feinstein to Katz, Banks, and Bromwell – Kj]

    Mitchell’s other illuminating line of questions was about how Ford, who fears flying, was nevertheless forced to fly across the country and testify in Washington rather under oath at home in California.

    Ford said she would have preferred to have congressional staff visit her, but was told that was impossible.

    When Mitchell informed Ford in the hearing Thursday that Grassley had in fact offered to send staff out to California to spare Ford the trip, the witness reacted with real surprise. Neither her lawyer nor anyone else apparently had told her that this was an option.

    [Was it surprise, or panic? Ford’s attorneys Katz and Bromwich sure jumped to intercept the question claiming attorney-client privilege and both covered the mike.

    Watching Ford’s reaction to Mitchell’s question, she was caught flatfooted, was panicky and nervous with eyes darting around for a few seconds, then kept looking at Bromwich as Grassley asked his question, then she came up with her non-answer, “It wasn’t clear to me that that was the case”. So, yes, she was told by Katz and Banks that Grassley was willing to send staff out to California -Kj]

    Why would Katz hide this offer from her client? The answer is obvious if you look at the invitation to a fundraiser that Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., has scheduled for this fall.

    The headliner is none other than Katz. Katz is a party fundraiser and an abortion industry lawyer. She is on the same team as Feinstein. Neither is an ally of Ford. They are her abusers and manipulators.

    That’s why Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was right in his anger to declare that Ford and Kavanaugh are both victims of Democratic senators.

    [I could almost like Graham just for his passionate, masterful dressing down of the Democrats, their inept and clownish game-playing sham and abuses, and their cynical use and abuse of process for all Americans and the world to see.-Kj]

    These left-wing political hacks purposefully victimized Kavanaugh, concealing Ford’s allegation from everyone, even in closed sessions with Kavanaugh, and then disclosing it as late as possible in the hope that it could delay or prevent a good man’s confirmation.

    Democrats didn’t want to help their star witness, they only wanted to use her.

    They didn’t want to get to the bottom of her accusations, they just wanted to keep a Supreme Court seat vacant for two years so a Democratic president could fill it after defeating President Trump. This isn’t our speculation. It’s what Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, has admitted publicly.

    Many questions will not be answered by these confirmation hearings. But they have established one fact beyond peradventure.

    It is that Democrats are not interested in truth. They are only interested in power. Let us hope they do not get it.


    I found the original C-SPAN footage of US Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee surreptitiously passing what looked like an envelope on the RT footage to Jacob Bromwell, one of Dr. Ford’s team of attorneys.

    In the original footage, what looks like an envelope turns out to be a sheaf of papers untidily folded in half which included a blue page, revealed just as Bromwell was inserting them into his inside jacket pocket. That doesn’t mean there couldn’t be an envelop stuck inside of the papers.

    From Jackson’s unmistakably low furtive movement at or just below desk height handing the papers over (and then looks back over her shoulder) after saying a couple of words, as well Bromwell quickly taking them in hand without even glancing at them to place them in his pocket, strongly suggests that it was a transfer that Bromwell expected, and which had more importance than some kind of hearing notes that Rep. Lee’s office said came from women not let into the hearing.

    Who knows?

  39. pesach ben or September 28, 2018 @ 1:45 am

    Sheep-dippers still at it with the usual skullduggery.

    Anti-diversity jewgle censors everything the truth-haters don’t want you to see.

  40. KathJuliane September 28, 2018 @ 2:24 am

    Graham blowtorches the Democrat smear schemers in his epic rant, exposing their “unethical sham” of their nasty 11th hour, 11th minute, 11th second sabotage smear campaign, and their sewage politics going behind the scenes.

    Feinstein is blistered by one of Graham’s questions.

    The Demoncrats’ repeatedly tried to push Kavanaugh to agree to asking the White House for an FBI investigation in order to halt his confirmation process indefinitely.


    Senator Graham EXPLODES at Durbin at Kavanaugh Senate Hearing of Dr. Ford Accusation in Testimony

    The Left, especially expert professional women in the trauma psychology field, can’t help themselves when interviewed but to notice and comment about how Kavanaugh demonstrated a great deal of hostility during the hearing toward some of the female senators on the committee, especially Feinstein.

    The News Media pornographers and twitterati pivoted to Kavanaugh’s temperament: “Oh, my goodness. Now he’s even yelling at a defenseless, harmless elderly woman — something a serial mass rapist would do.”

    The Left has taken as established, substantiated fact the accusations that Judge Kavanaugh is a serial sexual predator without corroborating evidence — or at least pretending him to be what they’ve painted him as in their new geysers of filth and smut.

    Feinstein goes at Kavanaugh with her passive-aggressive move for the kill, only to wind up with a contentious exchange with the suddenly feisty law nerd Kavanaugh. He cut her off mid-sentence numerous times parrying back her crap. Lavender-Reds and Democrat Twitterati were all abuzz about how mean he was to the elderly, 85 year old female politician, and he shouldn’t have been rude and mean to her.

    Kavanaugh is supposed to be defending himself, his career, and his family against the sexual assault allegations brought against him by Ford and the regressive Soros-backed Magical Lavender-Red Demoncrat machine.

    Feinstein is probably one of the most ruthless, amoral, self-serving, self-dealing, calculating and unscrupulous clowns in the Senate with an extensive political machinery spanning America. She’s a San Francisco Democrat politician, grafter, and dragon lady, not some sweet, frail, old grannie.

    It doesn’t change the fact the Feinstein, and she alone is at complete fault for torpedoing the very “fair and impartial” investigation that the Judiciary Committee is responsible for by sitting on Ford’s letter for 7 weeks until after the Judiciary Committee’s nominee hearing was over.

    In the pursuit of the Left’s political sham setup, Feinstein betrayed Dr. Ford, pretended like she didn’t. In the hearing when pinned by a Republican colleague, she blamed Ford for leaks to CNN that she or her office staffers made.

    Feinstein blamed her for the very abuse they subjected her to.

    Kavanaugh wasn’t merely being hostile for mysterious reasons, he expressed very justifiable righteous indignation and moral outrage as a man, a husband and father after he and his family had been dragged through the mud and sewage of the Capitol Hill Horror Show produced by Feinstein, the Demonrats and their Soros-backed regressive abortion worshipping political activists and operatives, the Media pornographers, and an entire stable of creepy, ambitious lawyers.

    Kavanaugh was even outraged by how the Demonrats treated Ford.

    Video: Kavanaugh to Feinstein: ‘I wanted a hearing the next day’

    This is PBS’ take on it: Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., asked Brett Kavanaugh why he has not asked the FBI to investigate Ford’s statements. “I’ll do whatever the committee wants,” he said.

    The Supreme Court nominee grew angry during questioning, interrupting the senator and saying that he “wanted to be here right away” to deny the sexual assault allegation by Christine Blasey Ford, and claimed his family had been “destroyed.” He also addressed another allegation of sexual misconduct from a woman named Julie Swetnick. “The Swetnick thing is a joke. That is a farce,” he said.

    Even Tapper and Wolfie of CNN were left to admit that “At the same time, there is, as of now, no contemporaneous, corroborating evidence for any of the charges, as far as we know.”

    “This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside, left-wing opposition groups.”

    “You have replaced Advise and Consent with Search and Destroy.”

    “This confirmation process has become a national disgrace,” Kavanaugh said in opening remarks. “You have replaced advice and consent with search and destroy.”

    “You may defeat me in the final vote,” he said, “but you’ll never get me to quit.”

    Then as encore to the entire mess, it turns out someone on Capitol Hill during the hearing was working from a House of Representatives office was despicably editing the Wikipedia pages of Republican senators.

    At least Sens. Graham of South Carolina and both Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch of Utah were doxxed.

    P.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., asked Kavanaugh about phrases used in the Georgetown Prep yearbook, one being the word “boofed.” “Boofed refers to flatulence,” Kavanaugh answered.

    This was something, he said, that high school kids thought was funny.

    In short, Whitehouse grilled Kavanaugh about fart jokes. Clearly, the Demonrats reach their intellectual ceiling in this hearing when the topic hits fart jokes told by teenagers.

    Indeed. I remember using “boof” in high school in the late 60s and at college in the early ’70s. Instead of saying “who farted,” it was “Who boofed?” when someone left a ‘silent but deadly’ behind to choke the rest of the room with.

  41. KathJuliane September 28, 2018 @ 6:42 am George Soros Sends $246 Million to Pro-Abortion Groups Smearing Brett Kavanaugh

    Pro-abortion billionaire George Soros has given hundreds of millions of dollars to the pro-abortion groups attacking U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, a new report finds.

    Fox News host Laura Ingraham reported Tuesday how Soros gave a whopping $246 million to Women’s March partners – some of the most prominent groups opposing Kavanaugh.

    “According to an extensive study by the Media Research Center, 100 of the 544 Women’s March partners have received a total of … $246,637,217 from Soros at last count,” Ingraham said. These partners include Planned Parenthood, the Center for Reproductive Rights and the ACLU.

    Planned Parenthood and the Women’s March have been some of the leading voices attacking Kavanaugh and assuming his guilt. He faces several sexual assault allegations, including from Christine Blasey Ford who claims he assaulted her when they were in high school in the early 1980s. Kavanaugh repeatedly has denied all claims of wrong-doing.

    Soros, one of the richest, old white men in America, is well known for using his fortune to push his radical pro-abortion agenda on countries across the world. He is a major donor to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in America, having given it at least $21.2 million since 2000, according to the study.

    Ingraham seemed shocked when she read the total, saying: “According to an extensive study by the Media Research Center, 100 of the 544 Women’s March partners have received a total of $246 [million] — am I reading this right — $637,217 from Soros at last count. It’s chump change,” she added sarcastically.

    Also this week, The Daily Caller reported Soros indirectly funded Fusion GPS, a research firm that claimed the Center for Medical Progress videos exposing Planned Parenthood’s harvesting of aborted baby parts were not to be believed.

    The report continues:

    A spokesman for left-wing billionaire financier George Soros is acknowledging that he indirectly funded Fusion GPS, the firm behind the Steele dossier.

    Sources have told The Daily Caller News Foundation in the past that Soros helped fund Fusion’s post-election work on Russian interference in the election process.

    Soros’ spokesman told The Washington Post that Soros donated to the Democracy Integrity Project, a group founded by a former staffer to Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

    Soros has been funding groups attacking Kavanaugh for months, long before the sexual assault allegations surfaced. In July, The DC reported a $5 million campaign by Demand Justice to stop Kavanaugh had significant ties to Soros.

    Pro-abortion groups have labeled Kavanaugh a “serious threat” to “women’s right” to abortion, while national pro-life leaders have expressed high hopes for Kavanaugh and the future of unborn babies’ rights.

    Kavanaugh has served on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for D.C. for more than a decade, where he wrote decisions protecting religious liberty and enforcing restrictions on abortion. Pro-life leaders believe he would do the same on the U.S. Supreme Court.

  42. KathJuliane September 28, 2018 @ 6:54 am

    Study: TV News Is Rigged Against Brett Kavanaugh

    During the twelve days since Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein publicly announced the existence of an unspecified allegation against Brett Kavanaugh, the ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows have spent nearly six hours (344 minutes) regurgitating various unproved allegations against the Supreme Court nominee.

    But only a tiny percentage of that coverage — a measly eight percent — has been devoted to Kavanaugh’s denials and the lack of corroboration for his accusers’ accounts.

    MRC analysts pored over all of the coverage from September 13 through September 24. Most of the airtime (305 minutes) was spent on the allegations made by Christine Blasey Ford, which were the only known charges for most of this period.

    The charges leveled by Deborah Ramirez drew 37 minutes during the September 24 morning and evening news shows; an additional two minutes of airtime was spent on an unknown third accuser teased by Democratic lawyer Michael Avenatti.

    Amid that sea of coverage, our analysts found the networks devoted a minuscule fraction on the key points that support the Supreme Court nominee’s case:

    ■ Kavanaugh’s denials. Back on September 14, Kavanaugh issued a statement “categorically and unequivocally” denying Ford’s charges.

    For most of the coverage that followed, his flat denial was relegated to a few seconds in lengthy stories about the charges — sometimes no more than a parenthetical clause that reporters mechanically inserted in stories that bombarded viewers with the salacious details of each accusation.

    On September 24, however, the three evening newscasts ran a combined three minutes showing clips of Kavanaugh’s interview on Fox News, in which he stated his denials on camera for the first time.

    That night’s coverage boosted the total airtime spent telling viewers about Kavanaugh’s denial to 14 minutes, barely four percent of the overall coverage.

    ■ Ford’s lack of confirming witnesses. Almost as soon as Ford told her story to the Washington Post, Kavanaugh and fellow Georgetown Prep student Mark Judge (named by Ford as in the room at the time of the alleged assault) flatly denied that they’d ever been to a party matching her description.

    Over the next several days, two other individuals named as present at the event — Patrick Smyth and Leland Ingham Keyser — also said they could not corroborate Ford’s account, even though Keyser announced that she believed her friend Ford’s story anyhow.

    Important as these statements were, the networks didn’t seem to care. Judge’s denials of Ford’s account drew a mere 162 seconds of attention from the networks (49 seconds on ABC, 43 seconds on CBS and 61 seconds on NBC). Smyth was only mentioned by name once, on CBS This Morning, for a grand total of eight seconds. Keyser’s statement was mentioned on ABC and NBC for a total of 26 seconds.

    Collective references to these statements, or general statements that Ford lacked any supporting eyewitnesses, garnered an additional 94 seconds of airtime.

    Add it all up, and the three broadcast morning and evening news shows spent less than five minutes on this crucial evidentiary point, or less than two percent of all coverage of Ford’s charges. This statistic should embarrass any network which claims to be devoted to fair news coverage.

    ■ Character witnesses. The broadcast networks also buried the fact that dozens of women who actually knew Kavanaugh were publicly vouching for his good character, including women who knew him in high school and others who worked with him in a professional capacity. CBS spent just 65 seconds of airtime acknowledging these supporters, but that was more than ABC (22 seconds) and NBC (35 seconds) combined.

    Ex-girlfriend Maura Fitzgerald stated at a September 21 press conference: “In both public and private, Brett treated me and everyone I know with respect. He has always been kind and good natured.” But that press conference, which featured 75 women, merited just 21 seconds on the CBS Evening News, and 14 seconds on the NBC Nightly News. ABC’s World News Tonight completely skipped it.

    ■ Ford’s politics. On September 17, National Public Radio — hardly a right-wing outlet — passed along how Ford’s lawyer, Lisa Banks, said the accuser “was not motivated by politics,” but NPR added crucial context to that statement: “Ford is a registered Democrat who has made small political contributions to Democratic organizations.

    In April 2017, she attended a March For Science in San Francisco, which was held to protest Trump administration cuts to research, and she signed a letter in June 2018 condemning the Trump administration’s policy, since abandoned, of separating immigrant children from their parents at the border.”

    None of these facts made it onto the broadcast networks. Only NBC bothered to mention this topic, when on September 17 Today co-host Savannah Guthrie invited Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, to knock down the idea that partisanship was a factor: “According to the Washington Post, she’s a Democrat. A lot of people look at this and say here’s somebody who has a political motive to tell this story. What would you say to that?”

    That amounted to just 12 seconds of airtime, which was still better than ABC and CBS, which never spent a second telling viewers about Ford’s liberal activism. You can be sure that if a liberal Supreme Court nominee was being accused by a woman with an equally conservative background, the networks would make sure viewers were aware of that background.

    ■ The Ramirez allegation. Compared to the Ford allegations, the networks were more skeptical of those that broke Sunday night in The New Yorker — but only slightly. Roughly 16 percent of the coverage focused on crucial questions about Deborah Ramirez’s story that Kavanaugh mistreated her at a college party in the early 1980s.

    Out of 37 minutes of coverage, the networks devoted 131 seconds to Ramirez’s admitted memory “gaps;” 126 seconds to the statements of Kavanaugh’s college friends disputing her account; 58 seconds to the admission that there are no eyewitnesses who can verify her account; and 49 seconds on how other news organizations, such as the New York Times, had attempted and failed to corroborate the story themselves.

    Both Kavanaugh and Ford will get equal time to tell their side of the story at Thursday’s hearing. That’s a much fairer forum for Kavanaugh than he’s received from the broadcast networks during the past two weeks.


    The latest number of people that Ford claims was at the party is 6 (but “maybe more” she added to her statement in the hearing) four males (Mark Judge, PJ Smith, Kavanaugh, and Male Unknown), and 2 females, Blasey Ford and her lifelong female friend Leland Ingham Keyser (who doesn’t know Kavanaugh). All of the named persons that Ford claimed would corroborate something of her story as being there have denied that they attended such party.

    Ford states was able to escape the house, but she didn’t drive. Not one person has come forward to backup Ford even so far as to say the party actually occurred as she claimed, not even the person who drove her home.

  43. benzion kook September 28, 2018 @ 1:12 pm

    So much for space x & Tesla.

    The same SEC that protected the Jew fraud Madoff for 20 years has “investigated” Elon Musk & “determined” that he must be barred from runnng any public company for life.

    Pharisees never sleep.

    It won’t be a knock on the door at midnite, they’ll knock it down, as they did in the USSR.

  44. KathJuliane September 29, 2018 @ 12:43 am

    Reuters: Palestinians say seven killed as Israeli troops fire on Gaza protest

    GAZA (Reuters) – Israeli soldiers shot dead seven Palestinians, including two boys, who were among thousands of people who thronged to the fortified Gaza Strip border on Friday as part of weekly protests launched half a year ago, Gaza health officials said.

    Israel’s military said its troops resorted to live fire, and an air strike, after explosive devices and rocks were thrown at them and to prevent breaches of the border fence from the Islamist Hamas-controlled enclave.

    Gaza health officials said 505 people had been wounded, 89 of them by gunshots. They identified the dead as males, two of them aged 12 and 14. The boys’ families could not immediately be reached for comment.

    At least 191 Palestinians have been killed since the Gaza protests began on March 30 to demand the right of return to lands that Palestinian families fled or were driven from on Israel’s founding in 1948, and the easing of an Israeli-Egyptian economic blockade.


  45. Zionien September 29, 2018 @ 1:51 am

    If Ford can’t remember what house it was, when it was, OR who came to pick her up, how were they even able to come and get her? :/

    She couldn’t even muster a tear, yet Kavanaugh did!

    Seems to me that after such a traumatic experience, your lasting recollection of such wouldn’t be the boys laughing, as your ego would wrestle with, but of your being pinned down and not receiving help in such a disadvantageous position!

    And who wouldn’t remember their rescuer(s) who would drive to your aide?! She’s full of H.S., just as she was with her hurt little girl voice that she turned on, then off to talk about parts of the human brain, and such – she’s a paid Soros/Clinton WORM!

    I hope the FBI investigates her, gives her a REAL lie detector test and exposes FienStain and her Synagogue Of Satan cohorts as traitorous obstructionists to the American people!+

  46. Zionien September 29, 2018 @ 1:56 am

    Just seems sooo strange that you don’t hear FinStain and her wormy cohorts reveling about a NEW FBI investigation!

    Could it be they were just bluffing Kavanaugh, trying to get him to show some sort of fear of one..? They seem to be the ones fearing it now!

    I have a feeling that a lot of WORMS will be unearthed and ready for the hook soon – Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

    Time to go fishing!!!:)+

  47. Karl B September 29, 2018 @ 4:52 am

    I also don’t watch TV, but I’m addicted to the Brother Nathanael Channel.

    As well as a host of politically incorrect youtubers.

  48. The Englishman September 29, 2018 @ 7:41 am

    Karl B

    Your top line, #MeeToo Addiction to the Brother Nathanael Channel + it’s priceless stalwarts!

  49. Ted Gorsline September 29, 2018 @ 8:27 am


    Allegedly Dr Ford’s real problem with Kavanaugh is that “He doesn’t phone. He doesn’t write!”

  50. KathJuliane September 29, 2018 @ 11:18 am

    The Duran: Ford-Kavanaugh showdown actually reveals Democrat sickness (VIDEO)

    The victim testimony of Dr. Ford served the needs of Democrat senators. And after this scandal ends, Dr Ford will be discarded.

    Published 7 hours ago on September 29, 2018 By Seraphim Hanisch

    “Riveting TV.” “Shame of the Nation.” “Hollywood seethes.”

    The Drudge Report lists these and about thirteen other links at the top of its page as of the time of this writing to describe what was anticipated as a major showdown between the Democrats and Republicans over the fate of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, as his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, got her chance to testify in front of the Senate Committee about her allegations that the Judge sexually assaulted her when she was a teenager at a drinking party back in 1982.

    This event was both more – and less – than what either side of supporters probably expected.

    In what can likely be seen as a very refreshing display of conservative assertiveness, Judge Kavanaugh was completely unambiguous and forceful in his testimony from beginning to end.

    Further, and perhaps more significant, Senator Lindsey Graham delivered a scathing lecture to the Democrats who are to a man aligned against Brett Kavanaugh, and to a man, all stating they believe Christine’s story.

    Further, the sex-crimes prosecutor who the Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford told the senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, when she talked to them in an overnight meeting where all fifty-one Republican senators were present:

    “Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn’t even seek a search warrant.

    Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday morning.

    It is not necessary for Kavanaugh to secure majority approval of the committee in order to advance to the full Senate, but a favorable recommendation could bode well for his imperiled nomination — and vice-versa…

    “It’s a tough one. She offered good testimony, and so did he,” Flake, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said Thursday night. “If you’re making an allegation, you want there to be some corroboration. Where is the burden? It’s like impeachment. You don’t know.”

    In fact, this is true. Dr Ford was as unwavering in her testimony as Judge Kavanaugh was with his own. However, there was a peculiarity in Dr Ford’s testimony that is suspect. Watch here:

    Her story is complete, but she is reading it. It must be taken as strong possibility that this is to help her focus as she was already reported to be “terrified” of testifying.

    She also appears to be either forcing herself to have emotion, for her voice is cracking, but forced and very rehearsed.

    At other times she does appear to display genuine emotion. However, this testimony, while detailed, seems “vacant” of some real personal connection.

    Naturally, people supporting the idea that Dr Ford actually experienced sexual assault at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh would be inclined to take her emotional display as genuine.

    In contrast, this clip, at the beginning of her testimony, reveals a somewhat different character to her voice:

    She starts with a fairly strong tone of speaking, relative to her recounting of her story. But then, there was this rather strange episode concerning her polygraph test:

    Here the sex-crimes prosecutor’s questions get blocked by her attorneys (she is flanked by at least two of them), and yet, she reports the polygraph test as “extremely stressful.”

    The questions here seemed to run down a rabbit hole, yet the interesting situation remains that she was walked through this part of the questioning very carefully by her counsel.

    She said she was “scared of the test itself.”

    Again, why?

    This makes no sense. A person with a legitimate claim of wrongdoing by someone else should have no problem stating her case. And, Judge Kavanaugh was not in the room during her testimony.

    However, the presentation of this story is almost letter-perfect victim testimony, at least for Hollywood. However, again, the story Dr Ford offered is utterly uncorroborated, even by the people she named as witnesses or at least, corroborating people. They all denied this story.

    Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony was refreshingly brutal. Even liberal outlet Vox noted that the Judge’s anger “worked.” The man claimed he was set up by Democrats intent on vengeance for various reasons.

    In this, he spoke as probably anyone who is on the side of President Trump and his nominee would think and feel if confronted with a situation that looks like nothing less than a last-minute lynching. He was furious. One can see so right here:


    Again, the way one receives this testimony probably depends on his or her already-made-up-mind.

    This, of course is a tragedy, because the hearing was not purposed to make each side more set, but to shed light on the allegations and see what the real story actually is.

    Yet, as Brett Kavanaugh said himself, the attack was a disgrace.

    And unlike Dr Ford, Kavanaugh did not think only of himself. He noted that this tactic is dangerous to the future of the nation as a whole.

    He then got down to the brass tacks about Dr Ford’s allegation. He broke when he recounted his ten-year old daughter Ashley suggesting that the family pray for Dr Ford.

    However, unlike Dr Ford’s tears, which appear “forced”, Kavanaugh showed the much harder task of trying to hold them back. He noted, and acknowledged that it is evident that Dr Ford was abused by someone, but emphatically said he never did anything like that.

    He never, ever wavered from this.

    At the time of this writing the matter of confirming Judge Kavanaugh has been moved to a committee vote.

    The Democrats continued to grandstand, with several of them refusing to even answer “no” to the voice vote to continue the process. And, apparently, many of them simply left the room. At this time, the vote to move ahead went 11-8 to proceed.

    As continuing attacks come from Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the shape of the attacks remarkably resembles the attacks against Donald Trump – efforts to decry Judge Kavanaugh’s decorum as unbefitting of a Justice, and so on, just as Trump’s accusers called him “unpresidential.”

    There is one glaring issue about this story:

    Dr Ford’s story was reportedly leaked by Diane Feinstein (a fact she denies). However, the claims of and surrounding Dr Ford are conflicting.

    She claims to not want to have had her story revealed, but it was. By whom? If she didn’t want to be brought on display, she was anyway. Why? To serve the Democratic Party’s purpose.

    Christine Blasey Ford is now twice victimized in this issue. By making her story public, she and her family were reportedly receiving death threats. The same is true for Judge Kavanaugh and his family.

    Nothing good came out of this for Dr Ford, and she honestly looks unstable.

    It seems to be that another tragedy is in the making because this frail woman looks like someone in need of help, and not in need of nurturing of victimhood. But this will not come.

    And it will not come because like so many other people, victims serve a purpose for stronger people.

    For Dr. Ford, those stronger people were the members of the Senate in the Democrat Party. And after this scandal ends, Dr Ford will be discarded as soon as she is no longer needed.

    This is the sickness of Democrat politics in America.


  51. KathJuliane September 29, 2018 @ 12:40 pm

    An Idea Whose Time Is Long Overdue!


    News Star: Higgins: Test Congress for Drug Use

    U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins believes his colleagues in the House and Senate should be randomly tested for drugs.

    Does the Republican from Acadiana know something we don’t?

    “I have observed some behavior that would cause one to wonder,” Higgins, joking, said in an interview with USA Today Network.

    Higgins introduced House Concurrent Resolution 135 Thursday that seeks to make senators and representatives subject to drug screenings once every term.

    “Elected officials in Washington, D.C. should be subject to the same kind of random drug screenings that blue-collar, working-class Americans have to endure,” Higgins said in a press release.

    “Congress shouldn’t get to live by a different set of rules,” he said. “This effort is about maintaining accountability and ensuring sober service to We, the People.”

    Higgins, a first-term congressman who rose to fame on YouTube as “the Cajun John Wayne” through his creative Crime Stoppers videos, retains his certification as a deputy marshal.

    Early this year, Higgins proposed mandatory drug testing in a Facebook video filmed after he completed a random drug screening for the Lafayette City Marshal’s Office.

    Louisiana Democratic Party executive director Stephen Handwerk criticized the proposal on Twitter as a gimmick and touted Higgins’ opponent, Mimi Methvin, who the party has endorsed in the 3rd District race.

    “When you haven’t delivered at all for your district I guess all you have is gimmicks and bravado,” Handwerk tweeted. “Let’s send (Methvin) to Congress to get results and no more gimmicks.”

    “This isn’t a stunt,” Higgins said. “It’s not about shaming or embarrassing or ending members’ careers. It’s about our body adhering to the same standards almost every other working man and woman is held to on the job. We should be reflective of the people.”

    Members of Congress would have to reimburse taxpayers for all costs of the program under Higgins’ legislation.

    If a member tested positive for illegal drug use, he or she would be reported to the Committee on Ethics.

    Those investigations aren’t open to the public.

  52. jonas September 29, 2018 @ 2:18 pm

    Another great video Brother Nathanael!

    Sedona Arizona USA

  53. We're Screwed: and here's Why. September 30, 2018 @ 11:09 pm

    Well, I guess the cat’s out of the bag, folks.

    I guess by now, everyone has heard about the brutal, anti-Second Amendment, “Antifa” thugs, and how they repeatedly physically attacked peaceful gun owners at Kent State University Open Carry Walk 2018, over the weekend.

    Well, I believe Antifa is made up of off-duty law enforcement officers, because no other group would give ‘professional courtesy’ to any but their own kind, which is exactly what they did, and indeed, what they proved, this weekend.

    Bear in mind, RJN Family, that the Jews now control our state-side police, and so naturally, they have turned same against us. Yes, diabolical, isn’t it? Whilst simultaneously claiming to be victims of Nazis themselves, those same Jews (or their descendants) are siccing their guard dogs on us, with an unprecedented viciousness, I might add.

    (As you know, Jews are most afraid of peaceful, intelligent, self-organizing, self-governing, well-armed, well-educated, Christian white conservative males, their family units, and the communities and nations that rise up from such solidarity.)

    Brothers and Sisters, as companies and people step forward to formuliacally militate against gun rights, and to virtue-signal that, we need to remember them in a database. Each celebrity, each public figure who tries to disarm us, needs to be remembered. Each company that has a new mission statement full of foolishness and anti-gun claptrap needs to be entered into our database.

    Also, why are British doctors, who often get paid upwards of $120 USD/hour, or you can convert to British Pounds Sterling, telling their patients things such as to “go for walks with mum, to improve your health” or told, “to drink plenty of water”?

    Folks, does somebody, does anybody need to be paid such money to utter such mundanities? It doesn’t make sense–it doesn’t make sense at all!

    Well, it doesn’t make sense unless all of us, including those ‘patients’ under a GP’s direct care, are going to be dead in about 15 years time.

    These are just stop-gap measures, i.e., trying to stabilize extremely volatile autistic patients in their parent’s homes, or in local community homes, is really just ineffective. But when seen in the light of impending genocide, the hard-line anti-gun, anti-2nd Amendment stance, the stop-gap measures, the useless advice and dithering, and the miasma of lies from the mainstream media, starts to made sense.

    You see, the globalists basically already know that they are talking to dead people, when they talk to us; that they are dealing with the deceased, when they deal with us; and that they just have to keep the lid on things, and to keep those frogs in that hot water, until they are boiling, and then it will be too late for any of us to fight back.

  54. Brother Nathanael October 1, 2018 @ 8:18 am

    Dear All,

    Just finishing up Street Evangelism in DC. Going GREAT.

    Working on NEW Video now. Hope to post Wednesday.

    Stay TUNED! +bn

  55. Michael Burns October 1, 2018 @ 11:20 am

    GooTube has has struck a bargain with censorship.

    I see I can’t comment on your rather well made, and delightful visual sandwich about Kavanaugh. I guess I need my parents permission to see it, but they died when I was sixty-five.

    Strange, I can go and see the Watchmepee channel, and the “We are transgender scritchers from Zeta Reticula” channel, or “I’m selling my virginity for a buck” channel, but Jesus Christ on a cracker, I can’t see your scrumptious video extravanganza, with two skanks and good man. But I can see your nourishing and rather unique flavour of aunty semanticism. I share your views.

    Itz da jooz Brother N.

    Brother Nathanael I notice you spell your name with ‘el’ at the end, is that a little inside joke.

    Brother N, keep up the good work, Santa’s coming soon.

    Michael (with an ‘EL’)

  56. Dave October 1, 2018 @ 7:52 pm

    To Russia With Love

    For the first time in years another state is saying to Israel: Stop right there. At least in Syria, that’s the end of it. Thank you, Mother Russia.

    By Ian Greenhalgh -October 1, 20181310


  57. Dave October 1, 2018 @ 10:59 pm


    This is truly one of the most informative things I’ve ever heard and you’re right below it

    Veterans Today

    Uncle Gordie and Ian with Rense, (Video)
    By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor – October 1, 201811928

    And a gift from Brother Nathanael


  58. Ted Gorsline October 2, 2018 @ 11:14 am


    I am glad to see CNN has hired “Jake” Tapper because his name rhymes with “Fake” Tapper and fake news is what he does best.

  59. Israhell October 2, 2018 @ 7:37 pm

    Great Video of Putin Making Pilgrimage to Stunning Monastery Near Finland (Russian TV News)

  60. Israhell October 2, 2018 @ 7:39 pm

    Goodbye US Stealth. Russia Is Developing a Radio-Photonic Radar

  61. Dave October 2, 2018 @ 9:18 pm

    Russian Officials Confirm: S-300 Surface-to-air Missile System Reached Syria

    ‘The work was finished a day ago’, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu tells Putin.

    Syria said that ‘Israel will have to think twice’ before striking after the missiles’ transfer, which was announced amid tensions over downed Russian jet

    By Ian Greenhalgh – October 2, 201851067

  62. KathJuliane October 3, 2018 @ 12:04 am

    The Hill: The supreme hypocrisy of Democrats’ Kavanaugh strategy


    Before examining the revolting political racket choreographed by Senate Democrats around the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, a brief trip down memory lane:

    On the night of July 18, 1969, a U.S. senator drank heavily, got behind the wheel of a car with a young woman beside him and drove off a bridge. He saved himself, stumbled back to his hotel and passed out.

    She suffocated to death in an air pocket, according to the diver who recovered her body, although the official conclusion was that she drowned. The senator, Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), was 37 years old; the woman, Mary Jo Kopechne, just 28.

    Sixteen years later, Kennedy, then 53, had dinner with fellow Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), at a swanky Washington restaurant. Michael Kelly reported the scene for GQ in 1990:

    “It is after midnight and Kennedy and Dodd are just finishing up a long dinner in a private room …They are drunk. Their dates, two very young blondes, leave the table to go to the bathroom. (The dates are drunk too. “They’d always get their girls very, very drunk,” says a former Brasserie waitress.) … Raymond Campet, the co-owner of La Brasserie, tells [waitress Carla] Gaviglio the senators want to see her.

    “As Gaviglio enters the room, the six-foot-two, 225-plus-pound Kennedy grabs the five-foot-three, 103-pound waitress and throws her on the table. She lands on her back, scattering crystal, plates and cutlery and the lit candles. Several glasses and a crystal candlestick are broken.

    “Kennedy then picks her up from the table and throws her on Dodd, who is sprawled in a chair. With Gaviglio on Dodd’s lap, Kennedy jumps on top and begins rubbing his genital area against hers, supporting his weight on the arms of the chair.

    As he is doing this, [Betty] Loh [another server] enters the room. She and Gaviglio both scream …Startled, Kennedy leaps up. He laughs. Bruised, shaken and angry over what she considered a sexual assault, Gaviglio runs from the room. Kennedy, Dodd and their dates leave shortly thereafter, following a friendly argument between the senators over the check.”

    The infamous “waitress sandwich” sexual assault, after which the drunk senator laughed. The death of a young woman, after which he slept.

    Not only was Kennedy never held accountable for his long reign of terror against women, he was continually re-elected, lionized as a leftist icon and granted a state funeral.

    The Left justifies endless scrutiny of Kavanaugh by arguing that a lifetime appointment requires it, but Kennedy and others enjoyed de facto lifetime appointments, both in office and out via enduring influence.

    Would Kennedy have survived the #MeToo era? Perhaps. President Bill Clinton, accused of rape and sexual assault by multiple women, is still hailed. #BelieveAllWomen? Right.

    Too bad Mary Jo can’t speak “her truth.” Too bad Juanita Broaddrick tried to speak and remains shunned. And too bad Kavanaugh’s legion of female defenders apparently aren’t “women” enough to be believed.

    All sins — even the most grievous ones committed against women — are forgiven by progressives if the offender holds the “right” views, particularly on abortion. For Democrats today, politics dictates morality, not the reverse as has been the case traditionally.

    Witness the Democratic Party’s and the press’ relative blackout on allegations of domestic violence against Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the No. 2 official at the Democratic National Committee and current candidate for Minnesota attorney general (and who certainly aspires to a “lifetime” political career).

    Two women have accused him of relatively recent abuse, claiming medical records, video proof, contemporaneous witnesses and a restraining order, and yet there is silence from the same Democrats condemning the wholly uncorroborated tales of a teenaged Kavanaugh.

    When it comes to leftist champions, it’s “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.” But when it comes to conservatives, it’s all evil, all the time, even when there is zero evidence of evil.

    A constitutional originalist, Kavanaugh stepped right into the progressives’ line of fire. The political left knows that he will halt its long practice of using the judiciary to impose its agenda.

    Equally horrifying, Kavanaugh will serve on the court far longer than Donald Trump will serve as president, extending the loathsome Trump era well into the future. Unwilling to abide this, the Left must destroy him.

    It was laughable to watch beam-in-their-own-eye Democrats sitting in judgment of Kavanaugh: Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who employed a Chinese spy on her staff for decades; Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who lied about serving in Vietnam; and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who admitted to groping a woman years ago.

    Instead of exhibiting humility and grace, these Democrats luxuriated in virtue-signaling, trying to “out-woke” one another as they ditched the rule of law while showboating via “performance anger.”

    By contrast, Kavanaugh’s authentic anger at being smeared was weaponized to argue he lacked “judicial temperament.”

    For them, Kavanaugh was, is and always will be guilty — not of high school boozing or a teenage assault. Those things are mere pretexts for their wider fight. No, he’s guilty of something far more threatening: getting to a position to stop their forward march.

    Shortly before the Senate Judiciary Committee vote, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) bolted to a waiting microphone to vent outrage at Republicans. “This is about raw power!” she thundered.

    Indeed, but it’s about the left’s relentless pursuit of raw power to, in President Obama’s words, “fundamentally transform the nation” — and Kavanaugh’s ability to thwart it.

    So while Democrats still genuflect to Kennedy and ignore credible standing accusations against their own such as Ellison, they trash a highly accomplished man, truth be damned.

    Kennedy — one of the masterminds of the scathing attacks on Supreme Court nominees Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas — would be proud of his shameless successors, who will likely gin up more accusations and demand further investigation until they can push the process past the November vote, when they hope to have more leverage. Having scored a few delays already, they are circling sharks.

    For them, this pantomime is about getting, wielding and keeping “raw power.” That end justifies all means.

    Monica Crowley is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research based at King’s College in New York City, which examines national security, energy, risk-analysis and other public policy issues.

  63. Dave October 3, 2018 @ 3:16 am

    “Russia announced last week that it would supply the anti-aircraft missiles after Syrian forces responding to an Israeli airstrike on September 17 mistakenly shot down a Russian military reconnaissance plane, killing all 15 people on board.”

    So in 1968 Israel “mistakenly murders 34 American USS Liberty sailors injures 175 sends multiple torpedoes into the ship and now mistakenly downs this Russian plane?

    Yeah right.

    It’s about time the two great Christian militaries come together for a common cause against the eternal enemy of the Cross

  64. Dave October 3, 2018 @ 3:25 am

    God bless this beautiful true Christian American patriot

    We all need to do whatever to support her and keep her in office

    “Israel practices ‘apartheid’’ — Rep. Betty McCollum

  65. Brother Nathanael October 3, 2018 @ 7:58 am

    New Vid today…Stay tuned. +bn

  66. Mark October 4, 2018 @ 11:14 am

    The Jews Should Heed Isaiah 5:20:

    “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”

    This is the Jewish Media.

  67. ezwip October 16, 2018 @ 6:01 pm

    Trump’s VP Mike Pence would likely agree with this video.

    He came from radio and attempted to distribute messages from the state directly through it’s own radio and website, unfiltered by the regular media.

    There was some backlash over it, and it was kind of laughed off, but he’s definitely flirted with the idea for his state in the past.

  68. Brother Bruce October 16, 2018 @ 6:46 pm

    This posting is off the topic but very important – It is in regards to “Constantinople’s decision to recognize two breakaway Ukrainian churches … Constantinople has “self-destroyed” as the cornerstone for Orthodoxy worldwide, says the Russian Church’s public relations chief,” [taken from RT]

    This message does not need to be posted … it is personal communication for you my friend … as you know, this Orthodoxy schism issue is very big with global ramifications.

    This issue needs to be addressed asap and you my friend have the skill and knowledge to make people more aware – you need a new video for this subject matter.

    To assist you in this massive endeavor, I have provided you numerous web links that should be helpful.

    Charlie Rose Interview with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew
    Published on Apr 17, 2010

    Part 2 Charlie Rose Interview with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew

    Part 3 Charlie Rose Interview with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew

    Opening Address by Ecumenical Patriarch – RSE Symposium

    The Opening Address by His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew from the Religion, Science, and the Environment Symposium on October 21, 2009 in New Orleans, LA

    Archbishop Demetrios Offers Prayer at Republican National Convention 2016

    Archbishop Demetrios on his role and relationship with the White House

    Most Holy Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch condemns US/NATO aggression against Syria

    May 23, 2014: Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Arrives in Israel to Meet with Pope Francis

    2008 Synaxis Keynote Address: His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew

    ‘Attack against Christians’: Jerusalem church closes to protest Israeli tax plans

    Why Do Churches Refuse to Question Israel’s Actions?

    The last one is listed should be the first one to examine — as for the others, keep date and time in mind.

    I hope these links help you out — looking forward to your skilled and properly trained mind to address this very important subject matter.

    Your friend, Brother Bruce

  69. Bunyinj October 16, 2018 @ 10:20 pm

    When Rupert Murdoch was asked by the media, upon moving his office from Australia to the US, why he had done so….his answer was, “You can’t run the world from Australia”.

    Little do the people know the rest of the story, and why Sydney is now gaining a brand new stadium, to cover up most of the pollution caused by Murdoch’s brazen lack of concern for human, animal, bird, or fauna….and gets away with it?

    Media? Phooey!

Leave a comment