Main Contents

How The Jewish Lobby Works

Congress Articles, Jewish Lobby Articles, Three Main Characters Of The Jewish Lobby

HOW THE JEWISH LOBBY WORKS
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008-2011

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Please Help Support This Site!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Sources: Jewish Power: Inside the Jewish Establishment, J.J. Goldberg; The Modern Jewish Experience, Dr. Jack Wertheimer; The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, Mearscheimer & Walt


NO LOBBY IS FEARED MORE or catered to by politicians than the Jewish Lobby.

If a politician does not play ball with the Jewish Lobby, he will not get elected, or re-elected, and he will either be smeared or ignored by the Jewish-owned major media.

All Jewish lobbies and organizations are interconnected and there are hundreds upon hundreds of them. The leaders of the numerous Jewish Lobby Groups go to the same synagogues, country clubs, and share the same Jewish investment bankers. And this inter-connectedness extends to the Jews who run the Federal Reserve Bank, US Homeland Security, and the US State Department.

In other words, “Jews stick together.” Americans must know how extremely powerful the Jewish Lobby is and how it operates to undermine America’s interests both at home and abroad. At home - by corrupting America’s political system, and abroad - by dictating American Foreign Policy against America’s best interests.

Here is a list of the major Jewish Lobby Groups & how they work:

American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC): AIPAC has a staff of over 150 employees and an annual budget of over $60 million Here derived from private contributions from wealthy Jews and Jewish-owned businesses. In other words, “money corrupts & Jewish money corrupts the American political system absolutely.”

AIPAC has many “PACS” attached to their Lobby. PACS are “Public Action Committees,” sanctioned by Federal Law, that give huge donations to political candidates. PACS are the means by which AIPAC and all Jewish lobbies utilize the immense wealth of Jewry to bribe US politicians. AIPAC is currently lobbying for the US to attack Iran Here & Here. AIPAC’s Executive Director is the powerful Anti-Christian Jew, Howard Kohr.

American Jewish Congress (AJC): Its antecedents began in 1918 when Woodrow Wilson’s “influential friends,” Rabbi Stephen Wise, (founder of AJC in 1930), and Judge Louis Brandeis, (co-founder), participated Here in the drafting of the infamous Versailles Treaty of 1919 which made unreasonable demands on Germany.

In the 1930’s, the AJC led a major boycott of German goods in America, which, among other provocations of the Jews, prompted a backlash against the Jews in Germany Here.

Currently, the AJC works with pandering Congressman and “bought” Senators like Senator Jeff Bingaman to push through Bills with Zionist agendas Here. The AJC also has many “PACS.” AJC’s Executive Director is the powerful Anti-Christian Jew, Neil B. Goldstein.

Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations: 51 of the largest Jewish organizations come together regularly Here under the umbrella group of the Conference. Their Mission Statement reads, “Forging diverse groups [there is no such as “diverse” in Jewry] into a unified force to foster the special US-Israel relationship” Here. The Conference also has many “PACS.” The Conferences’ Executive Chairman is the powerful Anti-Christian Jew, Malcolm I. Hoenlein.

Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA): Founded in 1976 by Jewish neocons Richard Perle & Eliot Abrams. Its mission is to promote US aid to Israel with military hardware Here & Here. JINSA has its Jewish tentacles everywhere including the US Department of Defense Here.

JINSA has a formidable array of Washington power players on its rolls. Prior to Bush’s Presidency, JINSA’s Board of Advisers included Dick Cheney, Elliot Abrams (now the Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy), John Bolton (now Under Secretary of State for Arms Control) and Douglas Feith, who was Bush’s third-highest-ranking executive in the Pentagon. Cheney, Abrams, and Bolton are still in power having as their well-connected supporters, the Jews of JINSA.

Part of JINSA’s annual budget is spent on providing lavish “educational” trips to Israel for key politicians & high ranking US military personnel. Northrop Grumman, (Feith’s Law Firm represents Northrop Grumnan Here), which has sold ships, Hawkeye planes, and radar systems to Israel, are also represented in the JINSA membership. [Good networking for those Jewish-influenced contracts! Here ]

JINSA’s President is the powerful Anti-Christ Jew, Norman Hascoe. JINSA’s National Chairman is the powerful Anti-Christ Jew, (he is also McCain’s Fund Raiser Here), Mark Broxmeyer, a NY Real Estate Tycoon.

Middle East Forum (MEF): It’s Mission Statement Here reads, “The Middle East Forum seeks to promote American interests in the Middle East. We define U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam whether terroristic or lawful [dropping US cluster bombs on Arab children in Gaza Strip & shutting off fuel and water supplies to the Gazans]; working for Palestinian acceptance of Israel; [ethnic cleansing of Palestinians until only 1 Palestinian is left to “accept” Israel]; and countering the Iranian threat [bribing US politicians to declare war on Iran].”

MEF’s Director is the powerful Anti-Christian Jew, Daniel Pipes.

Zionist Organization Of America (ZOA): Founded in 1897 to promote political Zionism. Currently the ZOA has over 30,000 members in every major US city Here.

The ZOA boasts on its Web Site:

“The ZOA has played a key role in Congress [bribes] regarding victims of terrorism [Jews only/Jews are rarely “innocent victims”]; keeping Jerusalem unified under Israeli sovereignty [illegal settlements in the West Bank]; fighting Hamas and Fatah [US-made cluster bombs dropped on Arab children in Gaza Strip]; and working on the imposition of sanctions on Syria and Saudi Arabia [and the illegal invasion of Iraq where not a single Jewish soldier from America has died!].”

HOW CAN WE STOP THE JEWISH LOBBY?

Here are 3 options:

1) Commit suicide.

2) Write to your Senator warning him that taking bribes from Jews is a sin.

3) Never vote again.

OR:
+ Pray To The Lord Jesus Christ To Either Convert The Jews Or Conquer Them Through The Power Of His Cross!

For More See: “American Jewry’s World Wide Web” Click Here

And: “How The Jews Took Washington” Click Here

And: “McCain Bows To Jewish Money” Click Here

And: “Jews Run The US State Department” Click Here


CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Please Help Support This Site!

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com

Send this article/post as a PDF attachment to PDF | PDF Creator | PDF Converter

Brother Nathanael @ April 14, 2008

57 Comments

  1. Brenda April 14, 2008 @ 7:38 am

    American Christians have a duty and responsibilty before God.

    They must live their lives fully as Christians.

    On Judgement Day they will not be able to provide the excuse: Lord, I did not know.

    American Christians have ample opportunity to KNOW what it is that God expects from them: through Scripture, and through those who preach the Word of God.

    It is also the responsibility of every Christian to research, find and explore the Truth of their Faith.

    Those who sit complacently by expecting “others” to do their job, will be judged harshly.

    Christ said that many will call out to him, “Lord, Lord, did we not work miracles in your name?”

    He will say, “Depart from Me, I knew you not.”

    When Brother Nathanael posts his exposure of such things as the Jewish Lobbys that are having a devastating effect upon our American Christian culture and we, as Christians effectively do nothing, we are choosing then to NOT be Christians. . . and that will have an everlasting effect on others and our own souls.

    Evil could not flourish in this society if Christians lived their Faith.

    If Christians abided by the precepts laid before us by Christ and the Apostles, for example, bribery would have little effect.

    If Christians did not live a shallow and materialistic existence, corruption would be less prevalent.

    If a man’s word were his bond, corruption could not abide to the degree that it does.

    There will always be those who choose to do evil — but will there always be Christians to live holy lives in opposition to Evil.

    We shall see.

  2. Loren April 14, 2008 @ 11:37 am

    Definitely. But in the many churches that I have been in over the years, some have taught and stressed “touch not God’s anointed”, often times referring to the pastor and his elders/leaders/etc, the effect being, that even in bringing something “into question” is a gross violation against those God has set into authority. Consequently, the tough questions never get asked, or if asked, not answered, or if answered, in the favor of those “on top”. So, in the context of this environment, it is next to impossible to bring up the topics that are discussed on this website, especially any that would criticise “the Jews”, because they are, after all, “God’s chosen people”, and so, can do whatever they want to whomever they want, without consequence. Which is obviously, to anyone with a sound mind and a clear conscience, blatantly false.

    Any honest reading through the Old Testament would give ample evidence that God Himself has had more than one occasion when He has taken serious issue against “His chosen people”, even to the point of blasting them verbally through the prophets, even to the point of bringing forth judgments and wrath upon them. Would He be any different today towards “the Jews”, or even towards “the Christians”? And should “the Christians” drop the ball (as “the Jews” had done previously), will God choose another who will be responsive to Him? Yes.

    “Once saved, always saved” IS a false doctrine at the least, and a lie from hell at the most (ie, the serpent’s lie “surely you will not die”). Lucifer was God’s “chosen” at the remote past, but “fell” from his “salvation”. If he, who was before the very Throne of God, in God’s Holy Presence, day after week after month after year .. AND YET, turned away and left and REBELLED and WAGED WAR … then so too can “God’s chosen people”.

    “The Jews” turned away from their salvation when He (Jesus) was here in the flesh. They still await their messiah. A false one they will accept (the yet-to-be anti-christ), but the true One they rejected - and when the true One returns, He won’t be coming in peace, but in war against ALL who oppose Him! including those of “the Jews” who oppose Him! including those of “the Christians” who have “fallen away” from their faith.

    The problem that John the Baptist had with King Herod was that he never brought gifts unto the King, but only the unadultered Word of God! As much as John grated against the King, the King admired John, for he knew that John would always tell him the truth, while his loyal counselors would tell him only what he wanted to hear. In the end, however, John’s “speaking truth to power” cost him his head - but not his Eternity!

    Christianity in this nation, for the most part, has not, and is not, willing to speak truth to power because Christians are not willing to lose their heads as John did, nor willing to sacrifice themselves unto the Truth, nor willing to take up their crosses, and follow the One who has called them unto purity.

    For this, Jesus will spit them out of His mouth!

    It is time to be as John the Baptist, to speak truth to power, to declare, and to live, the unadultered Word of God unto and before ALL (yet, with the mercy and graciousness of God, for where would any of us be without His mercy and graciousness?).

    For example :

    The Federal Reserve was from its inception of Satan. Christians should have nothing to do with this occult dark power and means of carnal lust-driven sustenance. But do we declare such? Or do we willingly accept Federal Reserve Notes, and ask God to bountifully bless that which is inherently EVIL? Can God bless Satan? Can Light bless darkness? Can Love bless hatred? Can Life bless death?

    On Day One of the Creation Account, God SEPARATED His Light from Lucifer/Satan’s darkness.

    SEPARATION! Be ye separate!

    Be we, as Christians, have not separated ourselved from this evil institution of darkness called the Federal Reserve, but have EMBRACED IT!

    Who is willing to go up against the Federal Reserve and to declare unto them the unadultered Word and Truth of God? Doing so will cost one’s life, even as John the Baptist, even as JFK …

    But rather to have one’s head cut off and gain Eternity, than to have Jesus spit one out of His mouth and lose Eternity.

    After about a year or so after 9-11, I quit going to church, because I could no longer tolerate the blindness of so many claiming to see.

    When the President encouraged everyone to “return to business as usual”, he was cursing this Nation in returning to “sin as usual”, and sin has grown abundantly since! to the point that we have lost all of our Rights, all of our Freedoms, all of our Liberties, all of our Dignities as Americans, and now are at the point of God bringing forth Judgment against ALL of U.S.

    “For I will remove both the righteous and the wicked from the land”. Things had gotten so bad in Old Testament Israel, that God declared that He would remove EVEN the righteous from the land, and remove them FIRST!

    Christian, WAKE UP! THAT’S YOU God is talking to! He WILL REMOVE YOU FIRST from the land, when He finally comes against this nation in judgment.

    In great fear and trembling, let us humble ourselves before the Almighty God, and confess our sins unto Him and unto one another. Let us pray for the wicked, pray for the hungry, the homeless, the fatherless, the motherless, the righteous, the wicked. PRAY! Build up in Scriptures. Let the Spirit minister to our souls, and may the Peace of Christ rule in our hearts, as our Faith becomes more and more anchored in Him, and then, unwavering, humbled before God, and honest before Man, with mercy and graciousness and steadfastness,

    declare the unadultered Word of God unto power, as John the Baptist did, and the many Prophets of God before him.

    Before we can take this Nation back for Christ, we need to take back for Christ our own individual lives in obedience unto Him and in what He has called us forth to do.

    Before we can speak Truth unto power, we need to live the Truth first.

  3. Lynda April 14, 2008 @ 12:09 pm

    “Evil could not flourish in this society if Christians lived their Faith.”

    Thank you for this comment Brenda. I understand exactly where you are coming from on this one. I think Christianity in America (which is very diverse) should come more sharply into focus when it comes to the Church Militant and the responsibilities of the Church Militant.

    In E Supremi Apostolatus, (1903), Pope St Pius X begins “Society at the present time, more than in any past age, is suffering from a terrible and a deep rooted malady…apostacy from God.”

    And further to this he adds: “All the strength of Satan’s reign is due to

    What? Or to Whom?

    The Jews and their money
    No

    The Synagoge and its political extensions
    No

    Corrupt politicians
    No

    Banks who own nations and engineer wars and famines and generally boss people around
    No

    Idolatrous religions
    No

    Islam or Islamo-fascists
    No

    The general Christian who has a ‘Jesus and Me’ approach to faith, who thinks the church should not meddle in politics, who thinks the Kingship of Christ is only a spiritual concept and that Apostolic Law has nothing to do with the laws of nations and the temporal order because ‘you can’t legislate morality’

    None of the above

    “All the strength of Satan’s reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics” according to Pope St Pius X.

    And what is on the Catholic itinerary for April? Why Benedict’s visit, of course.

    On (Jewish) Passover Eve, Benedict will be gathering with ‘our Elder Brothers in the faith’ and the Rabbis to pray at the Park East Manhattan Synagogue. “Carl MacGowan, “Rabbis Applaud Pope’s Visit to Manhattan Synagogue” Newsday, April 3, 2008)

    Every body else feels free to Take Offense - the Muslims if you draw a funny picture of Mahmoud, the Jews if you put a Nativity Scene in the school atrium, or some anointed victim if you say ’surgically altered’ instead of ‘transgendered’ or ‘homosexual’ instead of ‘gay’.

    So why aren’t Catholics taking offense at this? Not that I think Benedict is the pope, but even the idea of the anti-pope praying with people who exult in the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ and curse his name - as the Talmud does - shouldn’t even the most tepid forms of Christianity find this to be repugnant?

    Or what about the premier of The Sword of Constantine based on James Carroll’s “Constantine: the Church and the Jews” also opens on Passover Eve, April 18, 08.

    Naturally, the media (for Goys) will go all ape on all channels. There will be a huge schtick on all ‘the sins of the Church’.

    Constantine was a Tetrarch of Rome. When the reign of Diocletian collapsed (probably under the sheer weight of Christians martyred for the faith), the Money Power (guess who) decided to make a cool Matzoh by having the 4 generals of the Roman Tetrarchy fight it out for power. This was an exciting time, they had the barbarians invading from the North, they had Christians being routinely carted off to the arenas to die as public entertainments, they had a huge international slave market. In a scene very reminiscent of today, all they needed was a good long war.

    But it all backfired under the sign of the cross when the armies of Constantine were victorious. All he did was issue the Edict of Milan saying the Empire will now tolerate the Christian Faith. Well. The Chosen are still caterwauling about it. So this meritless film premiers on Passover Eve.

    How many Christians are going to register their opposition to this farce? How many will say, well - let’s have a week of feria: boycott all 100 Goy channels, make only the most basic purchases…

    Whatever it takes.

  4. Michael Cecil April 14, 2008 @ 12:10 pm

    Of the four options suggested above for ’stopping the Jewish lobby’, my guess is that this civilization will, most likely, choose option 1: Commit suicide.

    Senators do not believe in sin.

    Voting or not voting makes no difference.

    Muslims, Jews, Buddhists and atheists will never ‘pray to Jesus’.

    And any ‘power’ Jesus had was not in his “cross”, but in his Teaching…

    Which the media has made CERTAIN that, some 1970 years later, not even so much as ONE WORD remains; the Christians being followers of Paul rather than Jesus.

    Michael Cecil

    http://after-the-false-peace.blogspot.com/

    http://science-of-consciousness.blogspot.com/

  5. ShadowDancer April 14, 2008 @ 12:11 pm

    If your Nation turns out to be a Beast Kingdom/Nation, Mystery Babylon, or the Beast of Revelation then God has already decreed his Judgment upon any who worship the Beast, the Image of the Beast, or Mystery Babylon. My consideration of Mystery Babylon is there is a high percentage Mystery Babylon builds the Globalist system of the Beast. Some think this is the New World Order.

    Enter the False Prophets of various Religions who love & adore their Beast Kingdom/Nation, thus the Beast who think this Beast is doing God’s work when the Beast was doing the Devil’s work all along.

    Perhaps they are the False Apostacy that merely use Religion & the name of God in vain to perpetrate their own evil worldly agenda’s upon the earth as man was doing long before Jesus was even born of human flesh.

    The primary Beasts would have been the Govt.’s of Herod & Rome in Jesus’s time. The founders of the USA patterned their Nation after Rome according to my readings.

    When the Israelites asked God for a King so they could be like the other Nations (envy) God told them a King would enslave them. God knew in their hearts they didn’t want what he wanted for them so he gave them a King. Eventually they ended up with the Herod’s & Caesar’s of Rome. Perhaps God’s idea of freedom and the world of man’s idea of freedom are two different things.

    Jesus taught his Father’s Spiritual Kingdom that is not of the world of man, nor worldly things that can include worldly political philosophies, religious philosophies, business philosophies, educational philosophies, and philosophies in general.

    All man did was take Jesus and turn him back into Religion then started murdering and thieving in his name. & So this world is now as it is & is as prophecy has stated & will get worse as time goes along.

  6. Lynda April 14, 2008 @ 1:29 pm

    “And any ‘power’ Jesus had was not in His ‘cross’ but in his Teaching.”

    You are a Heretic, Michael Cecil. On what possible basis could you make such a wicked statement.

    The Testament to Jesus is written within the community of faith, namely the Church. The Gospels are the written Testament of the Apostles and sealed in the blood of their marytrdom (except for John the Evangelist) and those of their bishops.

    And you are telling the readers of Real Jew News that not one word of the Gospels remains? Really! Then where, then do you get one word of testament to the Teaching of Jesus if not from the Gospels? Your statement is a nonsense in and of itself.

    Here is what Jesus himself, according to the Testament of John, TEACHES about his cross.

    “Now is the judgment of the world: now shall the prince of this world be cast down.

    “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all things to myself.

    “Now this he said to signify what death he should die.” The Gospel According to St John 12:31-33.DRV

    “Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast down” is fundamentally a statment about power, Michael Cecil, or it is statement about nothing.

    Therefore does St Paul, our Lord’s Apostle to the Gentiles say: “The cross is the power of God unto salvation.”

    Basically, Michael, you have no concept of Jesus or his Teaching.

  7. r April 14, 2008 @ 3:43 pm

    Now i get it when THEY say WE are all connected.

  8. krylon April 14, 2008 @ 4:44 pm

    “And any ‘power’ Jesus had was not in His ‘cross’ but in his Teaching.”

    You are a Heretic, Michael Cecil. On what possible basis could you make such a wicked statement.

    lol, a ‘heretic’ ? The basis is: he spent 20 years doing what exactly? (teaching) and ONE DAY on the cross. I think your missing the point entirely. how is the statement ‘wicked’? and where do you get off calling people ‘wicked heretics’? A little judgemental for a so-called christian isnt it? I mean, you dont even know the man, and on the basis of one neutral comment your calling him an evil person?
    please explain yourself…pleeeaasse…

  9. admin April 14, 2008 @ 4:56 pm

    Get your “accusations” right dear krylon.

    Lynda did not say that M Cecil was a “wicked” heretic. But she did say he was a “heretic.” And that is a Christian thing to do when someone contradicts the Gospel of Christ.

    St Paul said in the opening chapter of Galatians, “If any man bring to you another Gospel that you have not received, let him be anathema (accursed.)”

    So Lynda was easy on M Cecil. And I agree with her completely. +bn

  10. Brenda April 14, 2008 @ 4:56 pm

    Loren, some very thoughtful comments.

    I did find a deeper understanding about God’s chosen people when I read and prayed over Romans 9, 10, and 11.

    The Israel of the Bible is not the state of Israel today. Jesus Christ was the Fulfillment of the Old Law, He is the New Covenant. Those who keep the Old Law and refuse to accept Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, have lost their standing as God’s chosen people.

    Here is just a partial excerpt of Romans 9:

    An excerpt from the Jerusalem Bible, 1966 edition. . .

    “C. THE PLACE OF ISRAEL

    The privileges of Israel

    9. What I want to say now is no pretence; I say it in union with Christ – it is the truth – my conscience in union with the Holy Spirit assures me of it too. What I want to say is this: my sorrow is so great, my mental anguish so endless, I would willingly be condemned and be cut off from Christ if it could help my brothers of Israel, my own flesh and blood. They were adopted as sons, they were given the glory and the covenants; the Law and the ritual were drawn up for them, and the promises were made to them. They are descended from the patriarchs and from their flesh and blood came Christ who is above all, God for ever blessed! Amen.

    God has kept his promise

    Does this mean that God has failed to keep his promise? Of course not. Not all those who descend from Israel are Israel; not all the descendents of Abraham are his true children. Remember: It is through Isaac that your name will be carried on, which means that it is not physical descent that decides who are the children of God; it is only the children of the promise who will count as the true descendents. The actual words in which the promise was made were: I shall visit you at such and such a time, and Sarah will have a son. Even more to the point is what was said to Rebecca when she was pregnant by our ancestor Isaac, but before her twin children were born and before either had done good or evil. In order to stress that God’s choice is free, since it depends on the one who calls, not on human merit, Rebecca was told: the elder shall serve the younger, or as Scripture says elsewhere: I showed my love for Jacob and my hatred for Esau.”

    If you read all of St Paul’s letter to the Romans in chapters 9, 10 and 11, a clearer picture begins to emerge.

    He couldn’t be any clearer. Yet still, some protestant fundamentalists still seem to miss the obvious point.

    THAT is why it is so necessary for Christians to read, study about and understand the Early Church fathers. It is there that we begin to grasp who we are in God’s overall plan.

    Lynda, as kind as you are, you know full well that I disagree with you about Pope Benedict.

    He is not an antipope, as your schismatic sect believes. I hope and pray one day that you will come to a deeper understanding — but more importantly Trust the Holy Spirit and His guidance of the One Church under the Bishop of Rome; he was handed the Keys by Christ and it was he was given the Promise of succession. Afterall, OUR LORD told him that the Gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church. (although we have witnessed many attempts, as you well know)

    And please everyone, stop panicking about the Pope meeting with the Jewish leaders.

    He is not going to convert them and they are not going to convert him.

    This Pope is about peaceful co-existance; something that is much needed among the world religions BEFORE they can ever Hope to have a realistic dialogue.

    We cannot call ourselves Christians and run around refusing to talk to people who have different religious beliefs than our own!

    For heavens sake, how could we even attempt to Spread the Gospel.

    In my opinion, Pope Benedict is doing what Jesus would do — as he did with the woman at the well.

    He first befriended her, told her all about her life, then offered her Living Water.

    He did not “take into account” the fact that she was a Samaritan, or worse yet — a woman . . .even a woman of “ill repute” with her five husbands, etc…

    No Jesus decided he would validate her as a human being first, TALK to her, and then . . . Lo and Behold . . . OFFER her Eternal Life.

    Shouldn’t the Leader of the Christian World (Pope Benedict) be at least as kind as Christ was to the Samaritan woman?

  11. Jack Harris April 14, 2008 @ 5:28 pm

    The probelm is Jews have made Americans feel guilty about the Holocuast. Even though we rescued and liberated them. We are the ones who bear most of guilt.

    Adolf Hitler was an Atheist. But the Jewish Lobby has somehow turned around and made it look like he was a Christian. Oddly enough now they are making Hitler out to be a Muslim.

    The reason Jews deny Hitler’s Atheism is because most Jews happen to be Atheists.

    Another prblem is the fact we allow the Christianization of Hitler without protesting one iota. When Jews try to abuse Muslims with the same rehtoric, we immediately join the Jewish side in condeming Muslims. Then when it happens to us, we sit around with our mouths open catching flies, cause by then we’ve already made a fool of ourselves and have to backpeddle. Our errors is what Jews capitalize on. Get us to agree with them, so we can’t disagree with them lest we look like hypocrites…

  12. Ian Wilson April 14, 2008 @ 9:08 pm

    Loren, you say that “Christianity in this nation, for the most part, has not, and is not, willing to speak truth to power because Christians are not willing to lose their heads as John did, nor willing to sacrifice themselves unto the Truth, nor willing to take up their crosses, and follow the One who has called them unto purity,” and for this the Lord will spit them out of his mouth. Well, let’s all start going in that direction by using our full names. Lookit, it isn’t Christianity alone that is being spitefully treated (a horrid blasphemy); it is our culture, out traditions, our lovely land (God’s footstool), our ceremonies and our beings! In some sense we are doing this to ourselves by not standing up! (Christ was no sissy, I’ll assure you of that.) Start with using your FULL NAME everybody. All these lobbyists don’t add up to the number of people who have read this site today. It is the wizard of Oz. Yes, and you gonna die.

  13. Lynda April 14, 2008 @ 10:01 pm

    Messages for Bloggers on Real Jew News:

    Krylon, when as a Catholic I say Michael Cecil is a heretic, please understand I am not going to denounce him to Homeland Security or arrange for the Masons to fit him out for an IRS audit or a ’series of unfortunate events.’

    As a Grandmother, I always assume that people know what words actually mean. And I am constantly reminded that I should never make this assumption.

    So at the risk of being tiresome, I will spell this out for Br Nathanael’s readers.

    Heretic is a civilized term for civilized discourse created by the Church and employed in discussions of Truth. To be a heretic means someone who has chosen to have a personal opinion against a doctrine of the Church. The Christian does not use anal or sexual scatology to degrade the person expressing an heretical statement and then insult his or her mother. The Christian says to the person - ‘you are a heretic’ and recognizes they are outside the Church.

    I mean, excuse me if Michael frequents the sacraments in a state of grace, but I think I am right in assuming that he is outside the Church. This is not good. But this is also his choice and I point this out.

    Br Nathanael also rightly points out that heretics who place themselves outside the Church stand under the anathemas of the Apostles. But for those who don’t know what the Church teaches and don’t care, I am sure they are not going to lose any sleep over it.

    This is a Christian website, the bloggers feel free to state heresies all the time.

    When nations that were Christian nations were ruled on the basis of faith and morals, there were penalties for being ‘out there’ with heretical statements. The heretic being ostracised from the Church was also ostracised in civil society. It would not be o.k. for example to make public statements denigrating of power of our Lord’s cross and hold public office; just as today it is not o.k. to make a public statement upholding the power of our Lord’s cross and hold public office.

    Heresy as a concept has passed right into the civil life of post modern societies.

    Just as today if you deny the scientific dogma of global warming and advance another theory of climate change - you are a heretic and find yourself ostracised from the scientific community and your research funding will be cut; if you deny the dogma of the Shoah, you are a heretic under international jurisdiction and the ICC will deal with you; if you use words like ‘natural family’ at work in the 9th Circuit, then you are denying the dogma of sodomy and its rights, thereby invoking Federal jurisdiction. You could go to jail for ‘hate crimes.’

    I hope this puts my statement in perspective.

  14. Lynda April 14, 2008 @ 10:28 pm

    Ian Wilson,

    R’s comment is rather creepy, isn’t it. Did it spook you?

    I think anyone who is offering serious comment here and reads other sites that are critical of The Chosen: their religion and agenda have also read the accounts of the Bolshevik Revolution.

    When the hammer fell, the Jewish Commissars of the Secret Government used the Bolshevik Revolutionaries of the Grand Orient and their recruits to round up everyone on their death list.

    We live under Masonic law and our society is even more thoroughly penetrated and under stricter surveillance than the Russian society.

    When the Revolution was unleashed, the Bolsheviks divided individuals by class - the middle and professional classes were murdered wholesale; if you had copies of the Protocols of Zion; if you had ever spoken publicly against the Jewish power and its agenda; if your Jewish neighbour didn’t like you and had reported you to their secret government, if you were in the clergy or prominent in the Church. These people were simply rounded up and shot.

    This is what a Communist Revolution is about.

    Everyone who writes here is on an Echelon data base. A young Sayanim has already been round to my place. We had a most enjoyable conversation and tea and scones on my back porch. But when the time comes, they know where to find me. While I frankly discussed these matters with him I also gave him my mobile no.

    Is that going to stop me blogging on the net and talking about subjects I believe need to be discussed. Of course not. God has not given to us a spirit of fear, but of love and power and sobriety.

    But I think anonymity is important because otherwise - in the meantime, you could get a lot of harassment from people other than the knock on the door from the death squad.

  15. Harrie April 14, 2008 @ 11:15 pm

    Lynda, you are very well educated. What’s a Sayanim?

  16. Loren April 15, 2008 @ 1:02 am

    Whether on the Cross, or 33 1/2 years of life prior to the Cross (with 3 1/2 of those years being of public ministry), every moment of Jesus’ life, every moment while His body drained of life while upon the Cross, and every moment He hung on the Cross after death had finally consumed Him, had and has ETERNAL significance! here in the temporal, as well as in the heavens, as well as below.

    Jesus was and is the ALL in ALL.

    Because so much has been focused on Jesus as the “Son of God”, few have taken into fuller consideration of Jesus as the “Son of Man”. Few have a deeper understanding of just what Jesus gave up and sacrificed … for ALL!

    Few realize that God had put ALL His cards on the table when He sent His Only Begotten Son into the Lion’s Den of Human Depravity.

    God placed ALL of Creation, ALL of His Word, and ALL of His entire Being - even His very own Son - as collateral before the arch-enemy of ALL that had been created by God, ALL that was/is of God, and ALL that is of the great “I AM”. Lucifer/Satan couldn’t wait to collect on what he believed to be his due.

    Eternity hung in the balance, all upon the life and decisions of Jesus. Most believe that Jesus had a pre-written script chiseled in stone, that He was impervious to failure in His mission on Earth, that He absolutely could not have failed if He had tried, that His life, death, and resurrection was a “done deal”, that He could not have sinned, for He was after all the “Son of God”.

    WRONG!

    As the “Son of Man”, Jesus was just as vulnerable, and even more so, to sin than any within the entirety of Mankind’s history - and He had EVERYTHING to lose if He had failed.

    Satan attacked Jesus throughout His life, and more so during critical moments, when temptation’s snare would have tripped up others - and could have with Jesus, as well. The temptations that Jesus had to endure were no different than those that all of Mankind has had to endure - satisfactions of the flesh, ego, and power (ie, the three Wilderness temptations, Matthew 4:1-11) - YET, there were those temptations that were unique unto Jesus, such as when Satan tempted Jesus to establish His Kingship on the Earth without having to go through the Cross first (the third temptation).

    For it was not only Jesus’ destiny to be King as the “Son of God”, but also as the “Son of Man”, as He was by earthly lineage the true legitimate heir to the throne of Israel - and not Herod!

    Jesus knew this, and so too most everyone else (even Herod - which is why Herod tried to kill Jesus), which is why the masses laid down palm branches before Jesus as He rode into Jerusalem - they were welcoming their true King, fully expecting Him to take the throne, and by force if necessary.

    Had Jesus given the word, paramilitary groups throughout Judea were at the ready to put Jesus on the throne of Israel and to kick the Romans out of the Promised Land.

    Had Jesus given the word - even without prayer, without consulting His Heavenly Father - by an act of His own “free will” - Jesus could have also called forth legions of angels to set Him up as King over the prophesied Heavenly Kingdom on Earth .. right then and there! But …

    “Not my will, but thine be done.” (Luke 22:42)

    At His most perilous time of temptation to forgo the Cross (at the Garden on the night that He was betrayed), Jesus humbled Himself before His Father and unto His Father’s will. Jesus knew full well what He would be giving up in the “natural” for that of the greater good - by Faith - of what His Father had called Him to do. By an act of His own free will, in Faith, and in obedience unto His Heavenly Father, Jesus purposely submitted His life, dreams, and destiny unto the will of evil men and their governments - even unto the will of His arch-enemy - Satan!

    The First Born submitted Himself unto the will of His Father, then unto the will of sinful Man, and then unto the will of the fallen First Created.

    Since Jesus would not “bow down” before Lucifer/Satan (third temptation), nor thereby to forsake God, nor thereby to acknowledge Lucifer/Satan as “god”, Lucifer/Satan had no other desirous choice but to slay Jesus through the words and actions of corrupted puppet men and their Satanic-controlled governments.

    And by mid-week, the crowds who had cheered Jesus just days before, had turned against Him and demanded His crucifixion. After having been beaten, tortured, humiliated, and sodomized, He was nailed upon the Cross to be put to death.

    As the “Son of Man”, by Faith did He lay down His life for ALL, that through His death, ALL who would receive Him by Faith might live.

    Jesus was Mankind’s ransom, and as such, the heavy weight of ALL the sins, darkness, and sheer evil of ALL Mankind (past, present, future) - even those who had tortured and crucified Him! - was placed upon Jesus.

    Jesus had become SIN on Mankind’s behalf.

    For the first time throughout Eternity, the Father had to turn away from His Son, because His Son was now SIN, and the Father could not / can not look upon sin.

    “My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Jesus cried out from upon the Cross.

    For sin brings death, and death brings separation. And for the first time throughout Eternity, Jesus was separated from His Father.

    Lucifer/Satan and all those within his fallen realm rejoiced at the downfall of the “Son of God”. Bearing the sins of the world, there was no way out for the “Son of God” from His eternal imprisonment within the bowels of the Earth. In spite of His keeping of the Law, in spite of all His good works, in spite of His love for His Father, in spite of His sinless life while as the “Son of Man” on Earth, Jesus was forever doomed unto the same fate as those now mocking Him - because He was now SIN.

    But .. there was yet one thing that Jesus had, that He clung onto with all His might, that Satan and all who had rebelled with him eons ago had not as they had trodden it under foot as garbage - a force more powerful than all of Hell itself, more powerful than Satan and all his legions … a power that was primal and intrinsic to the very character and internal makeup of the Father Himself from time Eternal …

    FAITH!!!

    “Now faith is a well-grounded assurance of that for which we hope, and a conviction of the reality of things which we do not see. For by it the saints of old won God’s approval.” (Hebrews 11:1)

    “But without faith it is impossible to please Him: for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him.” (Hebrews 11:6)

    “having been justified by faith, we have peace with God” (Romans 5:1)

    “Who shall bring an accusation against God’s elect? It is God who justifies: who is he that then condemns?” (Romans 8:33-34)

    “And through Him, everyone who has faith is made free from all those things, from which the law of Moses was not able to make you free.” (Acts 13:39)

    It was Jesus’ Faith in His Father, and in His Father’s Light, Love, and Law, Mercy, Graciousness, and Forgiveness, that justified the “Son of God” before the Father God.

    Because of Jesus’ Faith and expression thereof, SIN no longer could maintain its hold on Jesus, nor could Hell, nor could Satan and all those fallen with him.

    Reflective of the Lazarus story (John 11:1-46), when Jesus “cried out with a loud voice, “Lazarus, come forth.”” (John 11:43), God called out, “Son, come forth”!

    After having been three days in the belly of the Earth, the “Son of God” was raised from the dead - having been justified by the Father through His Son’s Faith and expression thereof.

    “It is Christ who has died, but rather has been also raised up; who is also at the right hand of God; who also intercedes for us.” (Romans 8:34)

    The Cross of Christ ..

    Without it, there would have been no death unto self, no sacrifice, no justification by Faith, no resurrection, no life eternal. Mankind would have remained lost, without hope of redemption, condemned unto the same fate as Satan and his angels.

    Before the Cross lies the “old man”, beyond the Cross lies the “new creation”. Before the Cross lies condemnation; beyond the Cross lies justification. Before the Cross lies death; beyond the Cross lies Life Eternal. Before the Cross lies Egypt, beyond the Cross lies the Promised Land.

    The life and teachings of Jesus, without the Cross, would have been nothing more than just another religion, just another “feel good” theology of making friends and influencing people.

    The Cross of Christ reveals the sin and depravity of Mankind for what it is. But the Cross also reveals the justification by Faith unto Life Eternal.

    The Cross of Christ is the dividing line, the separation of the Light from the darkness, the Sheep from the goats.

    What will you do with the Cross of Christ?

    Won’t you take up the Cross, and follow Him who is “the Way, the Truth, and the Life” (John 14:6)?

  17. Michael Cecil April 15, 2008 @ 2:47 am

    First of all, my sincere appreciation to the moderator of this website, that he allows the fundamental issue to be presented and even discussed here. To that extent, he is more honorable than ANY of the thousands of religious ‘authorities’ and hundreds of media officials (and who controls the media if not the secularists, the Jews and the Christians?) who I have contacted over the last 30 some years.

    Now to the issue that Lynda raises:

    The statement I have made is not “wicked”.

    What rankled both the Pharisees and the Sadducees about Jesus was his Teaching. (For example, “He spoke with AUTHORITY, UNLIKE the scribes and the Pharisees.”)

    By teaching that the “resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’, Jesus contradicted both the Sadducees, who denied the “resurrection” altogether, as well as the Pharisees, who interpreted it as a physical raising of a dead body from the grave.

    [I am talking about the DOCTRINE here, as taught by Isaiah, Daniel and Ezekiel, NOT the Resurrection of Jesus after the crucifixion.]

    Now, Paul was a Pharisee; thus, he INTERPRETED the Resurrection of Jesus as validation of the DOCTRINE of the physical raising of a dead body from the grave in direct and SPECIFIC contradiction of the Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’ that Jesus taught. Thus, it was Paul who was the original “heretic”, and who turned on the followers of Jesus, MURDERING them for teaching a different understanding of the Doctrine of “resurrection”.

    The “Gnostics” were then banished from among the followers of Paul (the Christians); and, some 1000 years later, tens of thousands of Albigensians were exterminated by the Roman church for teaching a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’ similar to what Jesus taught.

    So, back to my first statement: this civilization will more than likely COMMIT SUICIDE…

    Rather than acknowledge the Truth about the Doctrine of “resurrection” taught by Isaiah, Daniel, Jesus and Mohammed.

  18. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 5:26 am

    Brenda,

    I too believe in our Lord’s promise to Peter, Cepha - the Rock, the power of the Keys, and the Gates of hell can not prevail against the Rock.

    Rather, it is because I believe this, because I know the constant and ordinary Magisterium, what has always and everywhere been taught by the Church that I know with certainty that Benedict is not now, nor has he ever been, the pope.

    Joseph Ratzinger when he was ordained a priest would have taken the Oath Against Modernism, Sacrorum Antistitum. Fr. Ratzinger, the disciple of Arch Modernist Karl Rahner SJ and peritus of the Vatican Council II was publicly and manifestly foresworn of his Oath at that time: lauding Guadium et Spes as a ‘Counter Syllabus of Errors’- which is infallibly defined, etc. Benedict’s tragedy is that forsworn of Sacrorum Antistitum, he stands under the anathema of Pope St Pius X reserved in perpetuity to the Holy See.

    Use of the term ’schismatic’ means very little between the Catholics participating on this website. It might be instructive for you to learn what The Orthodox (who also have communicatio in sacris) think about ecumenism - one of the errors of Vatican II - for example.

    Our time is comparable to the time of the Arian Crisis in the 4th century when most of the episcopal sees were Arian and therefore alienated from the faith of the Church. The majority. The Church, very small in number, underground and persecuted worshipped outside the jurisdiction of those diosceses and did not recognize the Arian clergy - no matter how highly placed. The Arians may have had the numbers and the possession of the buildings, but the Church had the faith.

    So during the Arian Crisis, who were the sectarians and schismatics and who was the Church?

    In the long history of the Church, there have been anti-popes, there have been anti-popes seated in Rome, there have been rival claimants, there have been legitimate popes who by God’s grace have not presumed to teach the Church - being otherwise engaged in sinful and scandolous lives and there have vacancies of the Holy See.

    None of these historical realities have ever been regarded by the Church as invalidating the unshakable promises of our Lord made to St. Peter.

    The offense I take at Benedict is not socializing and talking with others of different views or faiths, but engaging in acts of worship with the Synagogue. It is not an act of charity for the anti-pope to confirm the Judaists in their errors.

    Please get acquainted with The Talmud, Brenda. Observance of the Talmud is not the same as the Covenants of the Books of the Law and the Prophets - what we call the Old Testament.

    “Judaism, the Jewish Religion as it is today traces its descent without a break through all the centuries from the Pharisees” - Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

    “The Talmud is, then, the written form of that which in the time of Jesus was called the Traditions of the Elders” Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson

    www.come-and-hear.com/navigate.htm.

    Neither our Lord, nor the Blessed Virgin were ever of the Pharisaic Tradition of the Elders.

  19. Loren April 15, 2008 @ 9:16 am

    In regards to not giving my full name on this site (regarding Ian Wilson’s post above), when I first came across this site, and read several of the articles and replies, I observed that most who replied listed only their first names.

    I thought of coming up with some unique name that would not identify my real name, but that would not have been consistent with the others who had revealed their true names, even that being in faith on their parts.

    So I did likewise, by listing my first name.

    I yet maintain that it is not anyone else’s business as to my full name - unless I should make it their business for whatever reason.

    No doubt, the dark powers know my full name already, as they have already initiated their designs against me, in their efforts to force me to bow unto their “beast system”, in effect, attempting to force me to renounce my Faith in the One who died in my place, thereby forfeiting my Salvation.

    But I will not, even unto death.

    And I humbly state so in Faith - as Faith in the only One who can maintain my Faith.

    Jesus the Christ will I only bow unto, and Him alone!

    Furthermore, when I present a post, I do so with humility and prayer, knowing that someone will read it and form an opinion at the least, and hopefully, a change in their life unto the fullness of Christ at the most.

    My desire is not to focus anyone’s attention upon my name nor upon myself, but upon the Name and the Person of the One who can save from death unto Life Eternal.

    If I have misquoted and/or misapplied Scripture, if I have not been as clear as what has been needed, if I need to be corrected about something, then don’t hesitate to bring such to the fore. I am still learning, too. I will take any correction, any suggestion, into prayerful consideration.

    This website is unique in the writings that Brother Nathanael puts forth. And also, that he has so graciously opened his writings up for review and discussion by others. But in doing so, a wide range of views are often presented by readers. Without an open discussion, however, learning cannot occur. And learning, especially of the “things of God”, does not happen in a split moment, but involves “process”, for God is a God of “process” - not knee-jerk reactions, not by shooting from the hip, not by-gosh by-golly, not let’s see if this works - but with well-planned purpose and intent and outcome.

    May the fullness of God’s blessings, and the revelations of Christ Jesus, be upon Brother Nathanael, as well as upon all who visit and frequent this site, and upon those who extend themselves to post their views and beliefs.

    Faithfully, in His service,
    Loren Earl Pedersen

    Warning to the darkness: He who contends against me, contends against God, my Father, who will then contend against you. Quit while you’re ahead, take your marbles and go home. But you won’t, for you are of your father the devil - so shall you now meet your destiny unto the Lake of Fire of eternal torment and damnation! All is now and forevermore lost unto you. Victory in Christ Jesus and in Him alone!

  20. Ed April 15, 2008 @ 9:58 am

    Brother Nathanael and Lynda: In your view, is someone who has read, understands, internalized and believes in the philosophy of Christ while rejecting organized Christianity and baptism also a Christian? In your view, does one need to profess to believe that Jesus was literally the son of God to be a Christian? If one views Jesus as a wise philosopher–perhaps even the wisest in history–but doesn’t take as gospel everything he said, isn’t that person also a Christian, in the same way that, say, someone who has studied Hegel and believes in his formulations is a Hegelian? From your religious Christian perspective, I’m curious what you think of the idea of Jesus-as-philosopher? These aren’t rhetorical questions; I get the sense, based on your remarks to MC and krylon, that you would consider it heretical according to religious Christian doctrine.

  21. admin April 15, 2008 @ 10:50 am

    Dear Ed,

    The Holy Scriptures teach that Jesus Christ is the Eternal Son of God Who became man for our salvation.

    Through Christ’s incarnation, His teachings, His example, His death, His Resurrection, mankind is saved.

    This salvation is appropriated to us through baptism whereby we die and rise with Christ and receive the New Birth and become part of His Body, the Church.

    As a former Jew, I am most honored to be able to say, “I am one in Christ through baptism with all my brother and sisters from every nation, we who are named
    “Christians.” +Br Nathanael

  22. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 2:18 pm

    Michael Cecil

    To deny that there is “any ‘power’ in the cross of Jesus” is and remains an heretical statement on this Christian website belonging to a Brother of the Greek Orthodox Old Kalendar Church - “powered by love and conern” for the souls of the readers. Full statement:

    “And any ‘power’ Jesus had was not in his cross but in his TEACHING.”

    And you continue to make statements that are

    1.against the TEACHING and explicit words of Jesus in sacred scripture as testified by the Apostles

    against the teaching of the Apostles

    against the doctrine of the Church.

    These statements collectively are heretical, Michael. And the Church regards heretical statements as wicked because they corrupt the truth and deceive the soul.

    Yes, Michael, I regard you as a heretic. Buttering up Br Nathanael so you can post on his website does not alter what you have written.

    Now I see that you are a Gnostic. Please read St Irenaeus of Lyon. St Irenaeus was a Celt, obviously had attended one of the many Bardic colleges in Eire or Gaul before his conversion. He understands Gnosticism better than you ever will. He decisively refuted Gnostic versions of Christianity for all time.

  23. Michael Korn April 15, 2008 @ 2:30 pm

    the jews are the bankers for the catholic church! they control all that hard earned christians mammon! so long as christians allow usury to operate the jews will control the church…

  24. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 3:20 pm

    Hi Jack Harris,

    I think the American Goyim are required to do more than just feel guilty about the Holocaust - starting in grade school.

    In March 2007, Congressman Robert Wexler introduced the Holocaust Insurance Reparation Act. Despite America’s war effort in WW II and many 10s of thousands of lives expended to halt the Axis powers, Congressman Wexler thinks America should pay Holocaust survivors 800 billion dollars.

    I seriously doubt that this piece of iniquity will make it into the mainstream media until it is already signed, sealed and delivered.

  25. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 3:23 pm

    Hi Harrie,

    Skunk has a good presentation on the Sayanim network on his website.

    http://judicial-inc.biz/Sayanim.htm.

    It’s an eye opener to say the least. The extent of private espionage and surveillance in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave has only started to be revealed.

    Hope this can help.

  26. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 4:58 pm

    Hi Ed,

    I have always thought it intriguing that the surrounding society does not call the disciples ‘Christians’ until the Apostolic seat of Jerusalem sends Barnabus to Saul at Antioch. Saul, the rabbi and convert, is now the apostolic delegate of the Church. And when St. Peter comes there he will establish his first Chair at Antioch - a feast “The Chair of Peter at Antioch” which is still commemorated today in the Catholic Church. Not to be confused with the novus ordo church presently in occupation of the historic Catholic structures.

    For the record: “And Barabas went to Tarsus to seek Saul: whom, when he had found, he brought to Antioch. And when they conversed there in the church a whole year: and they taught a great multitude, so that at Antioch the disciples were first named Christians.” Acts 11:25-26.

    From the historical account it is clear that the disciples of Christ are being taught of Jesus by “the conversaton” of the Evangelists and Apostolic delegates within the Church.

    So, Ed, if you reject holy baptism and the conversation of the Apostles and their successors within the Church, why would you even want to be called by the name of Christian anyway? The origin of the name and its meaning is clear from record.

    You are a philosopher. The teachings of Jesus are not a philosophy. They are not based on any system of reasoning: deductive, inductive or dialectical.

    His teachings are reasonable as there is no internal contraditions. But to have a philosophy of life or science or morals or whatever, you have to base it on something. or a system.

    Christianity is not a philosophy, it is a faith based upon a Person and the Testament to a Person, a Person who says things like

    “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life”
    Luke 14:6

    “You must eat my flesh and drink my blood”
    John 6:54

    “I am the resurrection and the life”
    John 11:245

    Michael Cecil please take note. This last statement of our Lord’s TEACHING occurs in the account of his raising Lazarus from the grave. The dead body of Lazarus comes forth from the grave at the command of Jesus. The people around him are naturally repulsed by this idea. Martha speaking with the natural mind objects: “Lord, he will stink, for he is now dead four days”. So what is obviously being discussed here is a dead body.

    Because, the Gnostics are always attempting to subvert the Gospel with doctrines like ‘rebirth’ usually to be interpreted as reincarnation, I will nail this down one more time. Our Lord’s TEACHING ‘I am the resurrection and the life’ includes his TEACHING on rebirth or “you must be born again of water and the Holy Spirit” John 1:13; John 1:3-5 (baptism and confirmation /chrismation). But it is not limited to it. The statement “I am the resurrection and the Life” is about the resurrection of the body, clearly because of its context.

    As in the Credo: “I believe in the resurrection of the body.”

    These are not philosophical statements Ed. Either the body that was stinking in the grave for four days arises and is restored to life at the command of Christ or it isn’t. Either our Lord himself on the third day, arises from the grave in his body, blood, soul and Divinity or he doesn’t.

    The Pharisees understood these points clearly. One thing I will always say for the Jews. While the Gentiles are in our head space or trying to figure it all out from some kind of philosophical perspective, the Jews have their eye on the ball. This is what they say: “If we let him (Christ) alone so, all will believe in him; and the Romans will come and take away our place and our nation.” John 11:48

    Believe, me Ed, they get it; they still get it, do you?

  27. Ed April 15, 2008 @ 7:00 pm

    Lynda, here are some sayings of Jesus that I would consider philosophical taken from the arbitrarily googled The Authentic Sayings of Jesus:
    http://www.religiousstudies.uncc.edu/JDTABOR/jesussayings.html

    If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also; and if anyone would sue you and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Mt 5:39b-41

    But many that are first will be last, and the last first (Mk 10:31)

    Everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted. (Lk 14:11)

    Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

    Swear not at all, let your yes be yes, your no be no . . . (Mt 5:34f)

    Lynda, you say: “Ed, if you reject holy baptism and the conversation of the Apostles and their successors within the Church, why would you even want to be called by the name of Christian anyway? The origin of the name and its meaning is clear from record.”

    But doesn’t the multiplicity of Christian denominations demonstrate that, in fact, the origin of the name and its meaning is far from clear?

    There appears to be no monopoly on Christianity or the teachings of Christ by any group or authority. There have been attempts, but none have succeeded. In my mind, even the attempted monopolization of Christ’s teachings smacks of Jewish authoritarianism, and hence runs counter to the Christian ethos, both in the time of Christ and as it has evolved in both the religious and secular world since. I guess I am interested in the religious Christian’s view on this because I can see Christianity’s influence in all manner of political and philosophical outlooks, which then often manifests into secular public policy. Yet if this is heretical, then in the religious Christian’s view, the line between Church and State should be strictly enforced, and Christians should fiercely object to spillover between the two, yet this is obviously not the case. And to not allow for “secular Christianity” which is one of the cornerstones of the West (if not the foundation itself) almost smacks of Islamic intolerance.
    I just don’t see how exclusivity or intolerance is consistent with Christianity or in the best interests of Western civilization. Isn’t the explicit rejection of each what distinguishes Christianity from the other Abrahamic faiths? Shouldn’t we explicitly state that it is Christian tolerance in conjunction with Christian morality that has made the West great, and explicitly reject the intolerance of atheist Marxism (left liberalism), Judaism, and Islam without rejecting other interpretations of Christianity? Why should regard fo Jesus’ teachings be limited to oath Christians? Isn’t that hiding a light under a bushel?

  28. Lynda April 15, 2008 @ 10:46 pm

    Hi Harrie,

    An update on your query about Sayanim that I came across today. Decided to post this on Real Jew News as soon as possible because I think this opens a new approach to Br Nathanael’s subject.

    One of the FBI field agents whose story became tied to 9-11 was an FBI wiretap translator Sibel Edmonds. She is a Jewish American of Azerbaijani Iranian descent.

    Along with Federal Agents Coleen Rowley, FBI Speical Agent John Cole, Agent Edmonds stumbled onto the terrorist plot which they thought was an Arab Terrorist plot. They attempted to get the authorities to act. They warned their superiors only to be sidelined, deceived, misdirected or fired.

    FBI Agent Edmonds was a wiretap translator. The Mossad tried to recruit her as part of their Saynim network. Obviously, with something as big as 9-11 in the making, they needed to make phony translations for the purposes of misdirecting investigations and generally managing the cover-up. Lots of bases to cover here as you can imagine.

    Agent Edmonds stood up to the Mossad. She refused to be recruited. When the Mossad threatened her, She went to her superiors with the whole story and reported agents who had caved in to Mossad pressure.

    This act of heroism in the service of her adopted country got her fired from her job as a ‘disruptive influence’.

    Now this is one very brave lady with a lot of guts and a lot of truth and integrity. As a Jewish American, her name belongs on the American roll of honour.

    It is because of people like Sibel Edmonds that Americans - both Jew and Gentile - are going to bring down the sons of bitches whose names feature on this website.

    Her website, which is a must read www.justacitizen.com prominently features the stories of 9-11 firefighters and victims whose stories have been censored.

  29. Lynda April 16, 2008 @ 12:01 am

    Ed,

    I think the name of the origin of Christianity is very clear from the record.

    You are talking about ethos, influence, political philosophies and moralities which have some Jesus teachings in them. And why can’t you call your brew whatever you want.

    I am sure you will call your brew whatever name you want.

    But in a world where people converse in words - then words have definitions and content. In this reality, the word Christian has a meaning based on its origin in history, the faith that is the same today as it was 2,000 years ago i.e. the Credo and established practices of that faith.

    The word Christian designates the Church.

    A lot of people call themselves Christian, taking the name of Christ - they like some of his sayings, or they prefer a society with the kind of ethos that the belief and practice of the Christian order i.e. the Church creates, or they want to empty the word Christian of its historical content and give it a new content. Like the New Age Christians (self designated) because ‘we have not yet made the transition to the Aquarian Age.’ Or the people who use the word Christian as a synomym for nice as in ‘it was a Christian thing to do.’ People make choices along the lines of all of the above.

    So in effect, by these choices they have emptied the word of meaning. It means everything and it means nothing.

    If you want to “explicitly state that it is Christian tolerance in conjunction with Christian morality that made the West great”, then you should say explicitly what you mean.

    The Pisceans (not yet transitioned into Aquarius) who built Santa Sophia?

    The Christians who believe Jesus TEACHING on “Our Father who Art in Heaven” but reject his cross, his resurrection, his commission to his Apostles - were they the ones who refused to accept Islamic civilization in Europe and a ‘we all worship the same God’ arrangement? Were those the ones who fought for the reconquista for 900 years? Or are we talking about the ones who just want to do the nice thing?

    Or what about the Christians who torched the great monastic foundations of England and looted them wholesale for the crown? Are they the ones who like the Jesus saying about “consider the lilies of the field.”

    Or on a darker note: what Christians exactly were the ones who made inquiry into other Christians who broke the Church’s ban on usury by practicing usury and a secret religion within the Christian government of Spain? Were those the Christians?

    Or what Christians made war upon the Christian insurrection in Languedoc that was standing over the Christians with a Kosher Tax?

    If you are not going to allow words to have definitions Ed, then you have to be content to make up your own language and your own reality.

  30. Brenda April 16, 2008 @ 9:59 am

    Jack Harris posts on April 14, 2008 @ 5:28 pm

    “The probelm is Jews have made Americans feel guilty about the Holocuast. Even though we rescued and liberated them. We are the ones who bear most of guilt.

    Adolf Hitler was an Atheist. But the Jewish Lobby has somehow turned around and made it look like he was a Christian. Oddly enough now they are making Hitler out to be a Muslim.

    The reason Jews deny Hitler’s Atheism is because most Jews happen to be Atheists.

    Another prblem is the fact we allow the Christianization of Hitler without protesting one iota. When Jews try to abuse Muslims with the same rehtoric, we immediately join the Jewish side in condeming Muslims. Then when it happens to us, we sit around with our mouths open catching flies, cause by then we’ve already made a fool of ourselves and have to backpeddle. Our errors is what Jews capitalize on. Get us to agree with them, so we can’t disagree with them lest we look like hypocrites…”

    Dear Jack,

    Christians must not get discouraged by the actions of the unbelieving Jews.

    We must hold ourselves to a higher standard.

    If you understand that it is their Unbelief that causes them to lie, smear, slander and basically invent their own reality — then you will not take “offense” by the wrongs done to you, instead. . . .

    As Christ instructed us, we must pray for them.

    In this day and age, we should fast and pray for them, and several other things:

    We should Take the time to learn all that we can about our own Christianity. We must read all about the early Church Fathers. As modern day Christians, we must understand the plight of the early Christians so we can, with Full knowledge, point out the errors of heretics and dismantle Untruths.

    In my view, Satan’s greatest weapon today is the modern day Christians lack of knowledge of his own Faith, AND his almost complete incomplacency to find it.

    One of the seven deadly sins (in other words those that can lead you straight to Hell) is SLOTH.

    SLOTH is personal laziness. It is complacency. It is not even desiring the will to be industrious and bring about the Lord’s Kingdom.

    SLOTH can kill a Christian spriritually first, but then even physically.

    It is time for LAZY Christians to get off their ever expanding behinds and Learn the Truths of their Faith; so that, when they are Called to do Spiritual Battle (as they no doubt Will Be) they will have the Spiritual Weapons with which to fight.

  31. Brenda April 16, 2008 @ 10:11 am

    Lynda, we will obviously have to agree to disagree on the validity of Pope Benedict.

    I am curious, though. In your perfect world, what would a ‘legitimate’ pope do and teach.

    Then, it would be helpful to me and billions of other Catholics, if you would explain how it is that Pope Benedict fails to measure up.

    I know you stress “modernism.” But other than the concept of modernism, could you explain SPECIFICALLY what it is that Pope Benedict believes and/or has written that specifically denies Traditional Catholic doctrine.

    In His Peace,

    Brenda

  32. Rosalie April 16, 2008 @ 10:19 am

    Thank you very much for your incredible articles, they seem to shed light on all the dark places.
    I have a question but unfortunately it has nothing to do with this article you posted as I could not find a ‘contact us’ section on your site.
    My question is:
    Why have you chosen a specific denomination in which to worship Yeshua? My question isn’t to put you off or to offend you or to even convert you to another it’s just a question I felt impressed to ask.
    Kind Regards Rosalie

  33. Lynda April 16, 2008 @ 1:52 pm

    Brenda,

    You know I don’t live in a perfect world and neither do you.

    I live in the real world.

    There is no 25 words or less answer for Catholics on the question of why the present anti-papacy is an anti-papacy. There are entire books and websites devoted to the documentation of this issue.

    As a Catholic, I hold that Benedict is an anti-pope in a sucession of anti-popes beginning 1958. Behind this statement are 1. historical facts that can be documented, 2. compare and contrast: the ordinary, constant magisterium (what the Church as always and everywhere taught and infallibly defined) as opposed to what the post conciliar church teaches and defines and all the contradictions. Then there is matter of the Roman Rite canonized at Trent and the new order of the mass not just how it differs but why it differs and how the changes promote ideas that the Church opposes and has always opposed.

    If you want to investigate this question Brenda, Todays Catholic World and all its links is a virtual library of Catholic truth. www.todayscatholicworld.com.

    Also, www.traditio.com - the first and still the largest independent Traditional Catholic website has a referenced FAQ on these issues or www.novusordowatch.com has a more ‘breaking news’ type of approach.

    What would a ‘legitimate’ pope do and teach. I quote the magisterium on this website all time. St Peter’s Chair has never been silent on the enormous issues facing our time or any time. We are not going to figure this out on our own. That is one of the things legitimate popes do - because St Peter’s Chair was established as a light for the Gentiles.

    And again Brenda, I am not writing anything against the Catholic faith, the Creeds or morals.

    New York has probably the largest Jewish population outside Israel. Benedict’s visit to an Orthodox synagogue to pray with the Jews is the third visit of the anti-papacy to the synagogue. This is an historic event which significance can not be overestimated, especially as so much of the hidden history of the twentieth century has now come to light. Namely, that the Bolshevik Revolution and later the Soviet that was formed out of it. This was the largest killing field in the history of the world - with deaths above 100 million - many of them, entire Christian nations - financed by the New York Wall Street banks. This isn’t conspiracy. This is documented historical fact.

    And, of course, from the anti-papacy there has not been one peep about Communism, Bolshevism or the finance of the above. Plenty about the Holocaust though.

  34. Brenda April 16, 2008 @ 2:27 pm

    Lynda writes,

    “And, of course, from the anti-papacy there has not been one peep about Communism, Bolshevism or the finance of the above. Plenty about the Holocaust though.”

    I have to agree here, there should be much more said about the evils of Communism. And, the millions that died at the hands of that evil atheist, Stalin.

    Lynda, I don’t know if you have followed Saint Malachi’s prophesies regarding the future popes, as revealed to him.

    In that prophesy, it appears that Pope Benedict is the second to the last pope — many believe he is the pope relative to the “olive branch”.

    Are you aware of this prophesy?

    If so, it appears that only one pope is left, “Peter the Roman.”

    Commentary written on this prophesy suggests that there may be ‘other popes’ between the present day pope and “Peter the Roman”, the final pope.

    It also says that Peter the Roman will lead the Church through very turbulent times.

  35. jon April 16, 2008 @ 4:23 pm

    Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel

    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/975574.html

  36. Thomas April 16, 2008 @ 5:42 pm

    A decent web site,but the same b.s. “I’m more educated than you’…’my understanding is more profound than yours…’lets you and I carry on a really deep discussion and leave the rest wondering what we’re talking about’… Altho’ I read ‘education’ in several of the comments I’m forced to ask, “who cares if you claim to be Christian”…I’ll opinion that you still live in the Dark Ages…believing in Mr. S.A. Tan and hell. And if the people who call themselves ‘Jews’ today aren’t…are you doing anything at all to awaken or alert the Christ-hating, jew-loving so-called Christians. The vast majority of whom would kill Christ in a heart-beat if He returned and began preaching the very same message again.

  37. james April 16, 2008 @ 6:23 pm

    The problem with Isreali lobbies is that they also set up lobbies for countries favourable to Isreal. They set up a lobby for there christian slaying poodle state Turkey which is reportably financed by drugs money and actively block US government recognition of the Armenian genocide. Also set up a lobbies for Kosovar and Chechen groups like ACPC.

  38. Lynda April 16, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

    Brenda writes,

    “I don’t know if you have followed Saint Malachi’s prophesies regarding the future popes” (The Anti-popes like Clement VII are also on the list).

    I think Benedict’s choice of name to be ominous to say the least.

    The olive is the branch of the Benedictine Order. It is the branch of testament and witness. He is undoubtedly aware that no. 111 Gloria olivae is the papacy before the final conclave on St. Malachi’s prophecy.

    Af ever there was a De Cruce Apostolica, it would be Benedict. Just as anti-pope John XXIII took the name and number of a previous anti-pope John XXIII, I think Benedict missed his name and his number. He should have chosen Clement VII - cross of the Apostles.

    As a rabbi, as one of the architects of the Vatican II Council, as an executive for both the Talmudization of the post conciliar church and the Noachida (which mandates the death of Christians) - he is smart, Brenda. Intellectually, he is off the chart. He is cultivated, he enjoys weird hats, he is a gifted musician, his sense of humour is well, diabolical. He is a total class act.

    You, on the other hand are consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. You pray the Holy Rosary for peace and the Triumph of our Lady’s Heart. You can not be deceived by any means. But unless the data of the matter is present to your mind in terms of what the Church actually teaches - how can you discern?

    The Church has clear and infallible teachings on masonry and the errors of masonry, Communism, the Synagogue, the Talmud, ecumenism, communicatio in sacris etc.

    It is only by the light of Christ, his Truth and what the Spirit is saying to the Church through the ordinary, constant and infallible magisterium - what the Church has always and everywhere taught - that you have the criteria upon which to make a discernment.

    The times of “diabolical disorientation” spoken of by Sr Lucia of Fatima, Dec. 26 1957 has been going on for over 40 years as the anti-papacy ‘Talmudizes’ the faith, liturgy and morals of the Catholic populations.

    St. Malachi in his prophecies refers to the last pope “In extreme persecution, In persecutione extreme S.R.E. sedebit Petrus…”

    The anti-papacy has yet to go to final conclave as far as St. Malachi’s list. My personal view is that the Church in Eclipse has already been to final conclave.

    Rabbi Yitzchak Kaduri of Jerusalem has already issued the call for all the Jewish people throughout the world to return to Israel. Sept 15, 05 / 11 Elul 5765 “to rebuild the Temple and to witness the revelation of our righteous Massiach”.

    And the world is watching reality tv.

  39. Harrie April 16, 2008 @ 9:48 pm

    Hi Lynda,

    Thanks for the info about judicial-inc. I advise other readers of this website to visit this website also. It explains very well how jewish people protect eachother no matter what. Even in the case of rape and murder. An especially horrible case is the one of Leo Frank who raped a twelve year old lady and brutally killed her. Instead of condeming him his fellow jews did everything and are doing everything to clean his name. Now they describe him as a victim of anti-semitism.

    Another horrible case described on this website is the one of Nathalie Holloway who was killed on Aruba. The guy who killed here was jewish. On the website they describe how his father and other jews are covering up the brutal murder of Nathalie. It seems as if these jews have no conscience. No remorse, nothing.

    This website is confronting to read, but it shows clearly how jews are above the law.

    http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm

  40. Jack Harris April 17, 2008 @ 8:05 pm

    Hi Lynda,

    Well I personally believe there is an attempt to carry out more pyschological damage via holocaust guilt on Christians than anything else.

    The holocaust dowery is really blood money, of course we can’t call it blood money as that is anti-semitism. Since I don’t see the pick pocket, I don’t feel robbed, but forcing me to attend a museum, or beaming hours upon hours of guilt into my home through the TV and radio is what I find most disturbing.

    I was on a forum where one person would adamently deny the holocaust, then log in with a different account arguing against the denials he made. More people spent time on those threads argueing back and forth, forgetting other important issues. Eventually he was cught for having three IDs.

    He wasn’t Muslim, he wasn’t Buddhist, he wasn’t Christian.

    He was a Jewish Atheist homosexual. His other ID he posted as the friendly gay neighbor guy, attacking Christian and Muslim beliefs. Most of the time getting them to fight each other.

    What in the world is a Jewish Atheist, I ask. Appareantly it is a race of Atheists.

    This is what everyone is up against.

    What does this have to do with your article and statements? Nothing really, it’s just I for am getting tired with having to deal with an enemy that won’t declare open warfare.

    With the Muslim extremists, I’m ok. They’ve openly stated they don’t like us. Fine, I don’t like them either… So lets do this… May the best man win.

    But these freaky weirdo type homosexuals, Atheists, scallawags of all kinds. They keep denying they hate me, but then stab me in the back at any chance they can get.

    That’s all I wanted to say… Thank you… Be safe out there…

  41. Lynda April 18, 2008 @ 1:44 am

    Hi Harrie,

    Judicial-inc is a good site. Skunk gets a bit creative with his pix, but otherwise the info is solid and can be reffed from many sources.

    On his links, a new one has been added. Pro-Think. It is a good site and features the best presentation of the 9-11 WhoDunIt I have yet seen.

    Against the official conspiracy theory of the guy in the cave, the evidence of the biggest false-flag in history is coming to together.

    On the Judicial-inc link Pro-Think read “Stranger Than Fiction” this presentation is posted from www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm.

    It features info on one of the American Jewish heros of 9-11 Sibel Edmonds.

  42. Thomas April 18, 2008 @ 6:53 am

    Hi Jack, My official position is: ‘Never believe anything any jew says’.

  43. Brenda April 19, 2008 @ 11:10 am

    Well Lynda, you have set yourself up as Pope Benedict’s judge, even going so far as to mock his Christian vestments — do you really consider yourself qualified to pronounce such a judgement?

    Perhaps you should read James 3 through 4:12.

  44. Lynda April 19, 2008 @ 3:00 pm

    Brenda,

    Are you referring to ‘weird hats’ - this is directly: the fireman hat, the santa hat -all of this was covered (thoroughly) with comment in all media.

    Lighten up Brenda.

    I have many personal failings and sins. Therefore, I frequent the sacrament of penance. The statements I am making here are not concerned with the personal or with my personal tastes and judgements.

    What I am writing about is history that can be documented, Catholic doctrine - subject matter that can be discussed and referenced.

    “Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error and doctrines of devils.” 1 Tim 4:1. DRV

    The Noachide Law (of the Talmud) sponsored by Benedict’s papal commission and his rabbi Papal knights for entire nations does supremely meets this criteria: “doctrines of devils.”

    I say this with no apology to anyone. For those who may wish to become informed about this, Maurice Pinay has the best coverage. As far as I know, Maurice Pinay is a Catholic in the novus ordo or at least his link is posted up by the novus ordo www.catholicvoice.co.uk.com. Refer to www.mauricpinay.blogspot.com. see all posts April 14 - 18.

  45. Brenda April 22, 2008 @ 8:30 am

    I have read Maurice Pinay’s “stuff” and he appears to be a schismatic also, like yourself.

    As long as I witness people such as yourself speaking deceptions about our Holy Father — I will not “lighten up”.

    Expect regular commentary from me on this site whenever I think you are off the mark.

  46. Lynda April 22, 2008 @ 3:28 pm

    That’s fine Brenda,

    I know for a fact that Br Nathanael values your comments on this site.

    Maurice Pinay is a Catholic who is in the novus ordo like yourself. He calls Benedict - the Pope. He also documents his views with many evidences and contrasts the ‘papal’ position with what the Church teaches and has always taught.

    This is not “stuff”. This is serious Catholic comment published for the good of souls. Particularly for Catholic souls who simply do not know their faith.

    You have yet to actually to back up any of your statements such as “speaking deceptions” with Catholic doctrine - even teachings from pastoral Council Vatican II or the novus ordo catechism.

    There is no warrant in Catholicism for ‘papalotry’. Who cares whether the pope or the anti-pope wears a weird hat or not.

    Again, please familiarize yourself with the dogmatic teaching of the Church. Namely Vatican I (binding on all Catholics) this deals with dogmatic definitions on the office of the papacy.

    There is no warrant in the Church for Popes teaching the errors of the Synagogue or other errors condemned many times by the Church - like ecumenism.

    The name ’schismatic’ coming from you Brenda, I do take very lightly. In the area of what the Catholic Church actually believes and teaches, I regard you as well meaning but clueless.

    At the time of the Great Western Schism there were three rival claimants to the Chair of Peter. The ‘popes’ with the greatest following were later regarded as anti-popes. There were, however, saints which the Church still recognizes today on all sides of the schism. St. Vincent Ferrer - who preached to the Jews of Spain, for example, supported (for a time) one of the anti-popes at Avignon.

  47. Ian Wilson April 22, 2008 @ 4:45 pm

    Brevity isn’t just the soul of wit - it is the soul of truth. Many here are penning entries as long as the New Testament. What exactly is bothering you? Don’t let the fact that you can’t understand our problem prevent you from solving it. Can’t you tell right from wrong, good from bad? There are many interpretations of things that may not really matter. The commonality here many waltz around is that we are insulted, shamed and humiliated for our God’s, our country’s, and our own treatment at the hands of these wicked people. Admit that you feel that much. -Why? -Because it is the truth. Your fretting may not be because you can’t understand the intricacy and depth of their wickedness, but because you are not confronting the wickedness, confronting what you can and dealing with what you can deal with when opportunities presents itself. As we get deeper into this, frustration and fear mounts. Look at what was barked today by the Hillary Clinton – nuclear war with Iran- Oh my! Does anyone here want this? No. Is this not universes removed from what we want? Does everyone else feel the same? Heck yeah! Does most every gentile want what you want? They sure do. We are not alone both here and above. Take that with you before you stand up to save your God, your country - and yourself.

  48. Lynda April 22, 2008 @ 7:06 pm

    Thanks, Ian for your take on how these tangents are coming across to people who want to focus on the issues of Real Jew News.

    “What is bothering you?”

    In terms of our focus, what is bothering me Ian is that WW III (about which you are rightfully concerned) is only one pole of this relentless dialectic.

    Yes the war is about Greater Israel and eliminating Arab populations. But it takes a war to redraw the map. It takes a world war to redraw the map of the globe.

    The other pole of the dialectic is, of course, the peace. Washington is now in collaboration with the Vatican and the Sanhedrin (Judaism highest legislative body) to lay the foundation of the jurisprudence for the new Soviet that will be the NAU. They are all very busy at the national and international levels to put all the necessary legislation in place now in order to “harvest the peace”.

    The building blocks of the New World Order are Greater Israel and its Soviets of which the NAU will be one. They are attending to the matter of the legal system now. Of course, it won’t be based on the American Constitution. It will be based on the Talmud (Judaism’s Supreme Codex) and they are putting in place now the jurisprudence of the Courts. These will be based on the 7 Noachide Laws of the Talmud.

    On March 26, 1991. U.S. President George Bush signed into law a congressional Resolution on the 7 Noachide Laws. House Joint Resolution 14. Public Law 102-4.

    Library of Congress entry: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.J.Res.104.ENR

    At the international level the sponsors of the Noachide are the Vatican and the Sanhedrin (Judaism’s supreme lawmaking body)

    The Vatican has ratified a similar agreement through the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of Israel’s Delegation for Relations with the Catholic Church. They have committed themselves to work together at the international level for the Noachide. And their agreement was signed at their Bilateral Commission Meeting in Jerusalem. March 11-13, 2002; Adar 21-23, 5767.

    http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/relations-jews-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20070313_commissione_bilaterale_en.html.

    During (anti-pope) Benedict’s latest visit, President George W. re-ratified the national and international accords pledging the U.S. to this project in honour of “Education and Sharing Day” with special commendation of the Chabad Lubavitch Movement.

    Since 1978, every U.S. president has signed an “Education and Sharing Day” proclamation.

    The agenda of the Sanhedrin for the ‘peace’ which will be the Communist global state is that all the building blocls or Soviets (such as the EU, the NAU, the Australian Pacific Economic Community APEC, etc. ) have the same legal system based on the Talmud. These are the 7 Noachide Laws for Gentiles. And Talmudic Courts will be the judicial branch of the world government.

    The U.S. is pledging now to install these Noachide Courts as a single “preferential religious and legal system”. These courts have 1 tier for Jews and a lower tier for for the ‘Goyim’.

    On the basis of this legal system, violation of any of the 7 Noachide Laws is punishable by death by decapitation. A non Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by 1 judge (no jury) and the testimony of a single witness.

    A Jew can be put to death on the basis of a court of 23 judges and 2 witnesses.

    Maurice Pinay is researching this. Please see his comment and all references on

    http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com

    Posts for April 16,2008. March 22, 2007.

    “Congress Convenes to Fulfill One of the 7 Noachide Commandments” March 18, 2007.
    on Maurice Pinay Blogspot as above. Or just click on Noachide for all posts.

    “Sanhedrin to Establish Council for Noachides” Arutz Sheva Sept 28, 2005
    www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/90646.

    Washingon, in accordance with peak international bodies ‘The Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate’ is legislating to establish these Talmudic Courts now.

    The tumultous welcome of thousands of Catholics (who are not instructed in the Catholic faith of Tradition and what the Church always has taught) is nothing short of a green light for this agenda in the States. For the anti-pope is a huge show of hands for the Communist / Zionist convergence and those who are working at the national level to implement it.

    This is what is bothering me, Ian.

  49. Spas Modic June 4, 2008 @ 11:19 am

    Like J. Edgar Hoover said in his book, “Masters of Deceit - The Story of Communism in America” (Henry Holt and Company 1958):

    “EVERY CITIZEN has a duty to learn more about the menace that threatens his future, his home, his children, the peace of the world — and that is why I have written this book.”*

    Instead of long treatises on fine points of theology and mumbo jumbo that to us “neophites” is hard to understand, or calling our Christian brothers and sisters “fundamentalists” or other names, it is our duty to alert them of what’s going on. There are many in our churches who are sincere people who are being mislead, intentionally or not, by their leaders.

    For those who come to this website who are not Christian, the simple gospel of Jesus is easy to understand: For God so loved the world that he gave us his only son so that whomever believes in him will not perish but will have eternal life. John 3:16.

    I have already started telling friends and family of the deception Satan, through his agents, is thrusting upon us. Let’s tell someone every day.

    Let’s pray and fast for our country, the world, and our enemies, that they come to know Christ also. Amen!

  50. john July 24, 2008 @ 9:49 am

    I am glad i found this site- i have been trying to wake people to the anti -christ and the anti-goyim.. christians really need to wake up because their is a full war going on to destroy christians and their church. from the posts i see that most know who the enemy is. the religion of judaism is totaly anti-christ, and to protect your christian religion you will have to look with a racial view as the jews do. their race is more important than their religion. actually they use religion and race to confuse the goyim, as to what they are trying to accomplish. i think anyone who has read the protocols of zion knows the agenda of the anti-goyim.i ask where is the christian soldier, where are those who stand in defense of christ. would you let your savior return to a house filled with filth and evil. daily the anti christ work to destroy the kingdom of christ.– an article in the american free press.net–global thought police decree passages in the new testament are “classical anti- semitism”- bible is hate; says state department office of global anti-semitism.—not only do the anti- goyim want to destroy your religion, they also seek to destroy your country.. if the anti-goyim succeds in its new world order or its one world government, christians will be slaughtered and murdered on a scale never seen before on this planet.christians should not support judaism or islam for they are both anti-christ. all must understand that untill you look at what is happening in this country from a race perspective, you will not save your church or your country. all non jews must awaken to the racial perspective, especially you who belive in christ and are of the white race,or of the goyim. understand that judaism does not see many races of people. judaism only sees two races of people. the jews(the so called chosen race) and the goyim(gentiles)the race who is to become their slaves if the white race does not wake up and stop what is taking place. actually you are already enslaved by the anti-goyim, but we still have time to break the yoke that has been put upon us. it is time for ESAU TO AWAKEN AND THROW OFF HIS BONDAGE AND CLAIM HIS DOMINION- THEN SHALL THE SEED OF JACOB BE EXPOSED FOR THEIR LIES AND DECEPTIONS,YES EVEN JACOB WHO DECIEVED HIS FATHER ISAAC AND STOLE ESAU BLESSINGS. YES THE SEED OF JACOB SHALL BE EXPOSED. EVEN JESUS SAID THEY WERE FROM THE FATHER OF LIES.—- ALL CHRISTIANS NEED TO PUT ON THE ARMOR OF CHRIST AND BATTLE FOR CHRIST, ESPECIALLY ALL WHITE CHRISTIANS, BECAUSE YOU WILL EVENTUALLY SEE THAT IT IS ALL ABOUT RACE. WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE JEWS LOVE TO LABEL SOMEONE AS ANTI-SEMITE OR WHITE SUPREMACIST, YET YOU NEVER HEAR OF A JEW SUPREMACIST OR OF A BLACK SUPREMACIST. FOR YOU WHO WANT THE FULL TRUTH I RECOMMEND THE BOOK (MY AWAKENING BY DAVID DUKE).WHITE CHRISTIANS NEED TO WAKEUP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BEFORE THE NOOSE IS SECURED TIGHTLY AROUND THEIR NECKS… YET FOR FEAR OF THE JEWS NO ONE SPOKE OF HIM OPENLY–HOLY BIBLE–PEACE TO ALL!!!!

  51. Me September 17, 2008 @ 8:29 am

    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1022090.html

    Hillary insults Jews by pulling out of event to protest Iran, a threat to Israel.

  52. Uncle B June 9, 2009 @ 1:02 pm

    Dear ‘People of the Book’ You are but a small speck of concern for the ‘Yellow Peril’ that is upon you! China has more post graduate students with IQ’s of 130+ than the U.S.A. has high school students, drop-outs included! More people in China speak English than in continental U.S.A.!

    Few are indoctrinated in your foolish religious conundrums, less are polluted in your propagandas! Worry your minds and waste your energies bantering about religious differences, your Achilles heel, while the Asian reality sweeps over you and reaps all that is good from you, and sends the chaff to Hell in a holocaust yet to come! It is over for you I am afraid.

    You missed your chance, your moment of glory, the open window of opportunity to save mankind, and in the greatest display of human greed and avarice, you threw it away on “The American dream”.

    Fools!, what remains is a simple clean-up job, beginning with the ‘Yuan’ moving rapidly to world currency status, a good-chink, bad chink, game of nerves in North Korea to distract U.S. politicians while manufacturing, trade, military, and social supremacy unfold over Asia, and finally, the rescue by insertion of a Chinese population, first into Africa for resources, then into the Americas for rescue from the ‘Third World’ Detroit City-like conditions your asinine Capitalism and corporate life system have brought you.

    The Uber-Rich have been bought out and now live, under our control, on the Shanghai stock market, in ‘Yuan’, not Yankee dollars. Only a decimating and disintegrating middle class, of no real value, and a dying labor force, the last hope for restoration remain.

    We wait. A great Communist force in the world, for the middle class to die off from over-eating and drunkenness, and the lower class to rebel, and fight the take-over fight for us!

    The American Military, a laughing stock to the world, the best equipment possible, but unmannable due to your perverted sex practices and lifestyles!

    Time is on the side of the Communist master plan, it is not dependent on annual votes, or four year shifts in direction, it is inflexibly locked and sighted on your corruption and weaknesses, and in time, will overtake you, Christian, jew, Muslim, Agnostic, Atheist, ignorant, educated, strong or weak . . . it is only a matter of time!

  53. Edward Palamar November 1, 2009 @ 5:58 pm

    Jesus Christ has raised me from the dead some 53+ years ago.

    This is the 53 comment.

    Happy Birthday Jesus, because I couldn’t have done it without you.

    “Peter the Roman” heralds in the resurrection.

  54. alaa alfahad July 1, 2010 @ 5:58 pm

    Here in these pages is the truth about Jews.

  55. David Homes May 3, 2012 @ 6:04 pm

    I am a Muslim and I love Jesus son of Mary. Peace and Blessings be upon Him and his Blessed Virgin Mother.

    What my belief tells me is that I can trust the Christian to sleep at his home in peace, but not at a Jew’s home as they are not to be trusted.

  56. Cute Girl July 1, 2014 @ 2:02 am

    I agree with David Homes, what he said, I wanted to say.

    Christians can trust Muslims more.
    Muslims can trust Christians.

    But Jews should not be trusted, because they are neither’s friend.

    American economy is facing downward turn, unemployment increasing because they allowed Jews soo much in their government, media, politics etc. Now reap the result,
    it’s NOT going to get better for American people!

  57. A Girl July 1, 2014 @ 2:16 am

    I agree with David Homes, what he said, I wanted to say:

    Christians can trust Muslims more,
    Muslims can trust Christians.

    But Jews should not be trusted, because they are neither’s friend.

    American economy is facing downward turn, unemployment increasing because they allowed Jews soo much in their government, media, politics etc. Now reap the result,
    it’s NOT going to get better for American people!

Leave a comment

Please copy the string XJ2ICg to the field below:


Feed