Main Contents

Pope Affirms Jewish Noahide Laws

Pope Affirms Zionist Noahide Laws In NYC!

By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2008-20111

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856


Following in the steps of his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, who officially recognized modern day Jews as the ‘Chosen People of God’ Here, Pope Benedict is fulfilling the same role of pandering to the Jews.

In his recent visit to America from April 15-20 2008, Pope Benedict met with representatives of the Jewish community on the eve of the Jewish Passover on April 18 2008 at 5 PM Here and reiterated that they are God’s “chosen” – of which any thinking Sunday School student would easily refute Here! The Pope said:

“Shalom! It is with joy that I come here just a few hours before the celebration of your Passover to assure you of my prayers as you recall the wonders God performed in liberating His *chosen people.*” Here

In a Bilateral Commission Meeting between the Vatican delegation and the Chief Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen in Jerusalem in 2007 Here an agreement was made which recognized that “Jewish tradition emphasizes the Noachide Covenant as containing the universal moral code which is incumbent upon all humanity.” (Cf Genesis 9).

So then? Not only are Jews “absolved” by the Vatican of their guilt for crucifying the Messiah Jesus — now Pope Benedict recognizes their leadership since they are the “Chosen People of God” and that the “Noahide Laws are Jewish tradition.” Hence who will ultimately be the moral authority that governs the so-called Noahide Laws? Jews, that’s who. Anti-Christian Jews!

It is paramount to note that on March 20 1990 President George Bush Sr signed into law a Congressional Resolution on the so-called Noahide Laws entitled House Joint Resolution 14 Public Law 102-4 Here & Here & Here.

This Congressional Act potentially gives the Jews the legal right to imprison and condemn to death Christians as “idol worshippers” according to the 1st Article of the Noahide Laws which considers the worship of Jesus Christ as “idolatry” for worshipping a “false god” HERE.

The Jews call this article of the 7 Noahide Laws, Avodah Zarah, enunciating it as a commandment: “Do not worship false gods as idols” Here.

The bottom line is that this ultimately means the international imposition of the Noahide Laws by Jews. And these Noahide Laws, which potentially can condemn Christians to death, will be governed by the Zionists who are given ownership over these laws by both the Vatican and the US Government.

Indeed, the ancient Jewish Sanhedrin that condemned the Lord Jesus Christ to death was recently reinstituted in Israel Here & Here. And the newly-instituted Sanhedrin wasted no time in arrogating to themselves governance over the Gentiles vis-à-vis the Noahide Laws Here.

We must all do everything in our power to stop the Anti Christian Jews with their wicked Noahide Laws now before it’s too late!


For More See: Christians NOT Jews Are God’s Chosen People Click Here

And: Jews Are Guilty Of Deicide Click Here

CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

Brother Nathanael @ May 2, 2008


  1. repcrac May 2, 2008 @ 8:20 am

    Hi Brother Nathanael!

    I think you’re underestimating Benedict’s intelligence here. What he’s talking about are the ancient Hebrews. He doesn’t, nay can’t go as far as to equate the ancient Hebrews with today’s Jews, since that would be tantamount to negating Christianity.

    All Catholics know (or at least should know, because they hear the words during every mass!) that the real descendents of ancient Israel are none other than the (true) followers of Jesus Christ.

  2. Ed May 2, 2008 @ 9:39 am

    The Noachide laws are essentially the means by which Jewish ideologues plan to subordinate Christianity to Judaism before ultimately snuffing it out altogether. Here is an article by Ted Pike and Harmony Grant that details the plan. They quote Rabbi Moshe Ben-Chaim:

    –“The Noachide laws,” writes the rabbi, “are the bare essentials that entitle a human being to retain his right to life.” Remember he is speaking of Gentiles as well as Jews and, yes, he said right to life. Ben-Chaim cites Isaiah’s prophecy that someday Gentiles will flock to Jerusalem to “learn Torah.”

    Jews must encourage this mass conversion, he says, by refusing to voice acceptance for other religions. “No, that deludes gentiles into believing we view their religions on par with Torah,” the rabbi writes. “Judaism views all other religions as imposters, since no other religion was God-given. Again, God said, “One Torah” for yourselves, and the convert.” This means no other laws are acceptable, for any people.”

    Here we are getting to the essence of why organized Judaism and its acolytes (including many Judaized Christian Zionists) are at war not only with Christianity, but against Western (Christian) civilization: they consider both “imposters” at odds with the will of God, which should never be administered by gentiles, but only by Jews. In America, this amounts to a scheme to overthrow the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion and equality under the law.

    The Jewish vision for the governance of humanity is essentially an institutionally racist caste system in which Jews are, by law, slotted at the top.

    No wonder the Jewish Bolsheviks imposed a system wherein mostly Jews governed the Soviet Union and murdered millions of Christians. No wonder the heir to Bolshevism, Jewish-dominated, increasingly Red-fascist two-party Washington jealously guards gentile America’s access to power and allows the Israel lobby to act as a gatekeeper. No wonder the US is fighting a war in Iraq for Israel.

    Christians and gentile Americans better wise up quickly, because their Jewish masters want to turn them into slaves, and are fast succeeding.

  3. Jon Ament May 2, 2008 @ 12:31 pm

    A clear case of the “wheat and the tares.”

    As they both mature, side by side, the differences become strikingly apparent. (Prior to this, both look almost exactly alike).

    And, we all know exactly what happens to the tares at the final hour… don’t we?

  4. Cat Callahan May 2, 2008 @ 12:57 pm

    George H.W. Bush signed some kind of agreement whereby the Nohide laws would become the law of the US-guess where that will leave us Christians?

  5. Alexandra May 2, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

    Actually, Jews still ARE God’s chosen! Racial Jews, not religious Jews.

    See Romans 11:1 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.

    The Jews rejected their Messiah so salvation was offered to the Gentiles to make them jealous (see Romans 11:11). They have been set aside temporarily. After the church is caught up (and not the whore Roman Catholic church) the focus will be back on the Jews during the Tribulation.

    This anti-Jew stuff being foisted upon us is only going to make the Tribulation that much worse for the Jews…hope you’re proud of that!

    The Catholic church and other cults claim to have replaced Israel, and that is a lie from hell!

  6. admin May 2, 2008 @ 1:39 pm

    Dear Alexandra – You are spewing a bunch of Schofield Bible Pre-dispensationalist garbage. Schofield was a criminal, in jail, and the Rothshilds promoted his drivel.

    St Paul was part of the faithful remnant of Hebrews who became Christians, that is, those who would be given the new name, as Isaiah the Prophet foretold in Isaiah Chapter 66.

    You do not know the Scriptures. I studied the OT as a Jewish child since I could read. I became a Christian in 1971 and have read the Bible cover to cover over 500 times and read the Bible every day, 12 Chapters from OT & NT combined. But I pour over the Patristic testimonies and interpretation of Holy Scriptures so as to learn how the early Church, that is, the Orthodox Christian Church to which I belong, understood the Scriptures. But this is miles and miles beyond your limited and errant grasp.

    Your “rapture” theology is facile and cannot be substantiated in the Scriptures. The tribulation that Christ spoke of was the horrors of 70 AD.

    Please read my articles listed above very carefully and you will hopefully enlighten your benighted soul. They are:

    “Christians NOT Jews Are God’s Chosen People” @

    And: “Jews Are NOT The Chosen People” @ +BN

  7. Ed May 2, 2008 @ 2:19 pm

    Alexandra wrote:

    “Actually, Jews still ARE God’s chosen! Racial Jews, not religious Jews…After the church is caught up (and not the whore Roman Catholic church) the focus will be back on the Jews during the Tribulation.”

    Alexandra perfectly illustrates the inherent racism of Christian Zionism. This is why Jewish racists and Christian Zionists are comfortable collaborating against all others, including Catholics: they consider them to be racially and theologically inferior, and seek to enslave them.

    I’m no Christian scholar, but I believe Christianity transcends racism and silly Jewish racial superstition. And these subversive racist Zionists are a dangerous threat to the Christian ethos and to the West.

    The good news is that their insane quest for domination and their “vision” for a world of institutionalized racialism is all coming out in the wash, and the American people see them more and more every day for what they truly are. Zionists and their crackpot ideas simply do not fit into Western civilization; it’s as simple as that.

  8. jonah May 2, 2008 @ 2:58 pm

    Bro N-
    have you got any articles out on the reformation of the jewish sanhedrin?

    Here’s one i found on

  9. james May 2, 2008 @ 3:18 pm

    Brother Nathanael

    When is the second part of the interview you did that was posted on going to appear. Its been about 2 weeks and still no post.

    Do you know who Zbignew Brezinski is? Hes the global strategist of the NWO who created the Trillateral commission, ISIS, etc. He is not Jewish put a Polish American and major international think tank directors either tutored under him or he is the director of it himself. I think he is the anti-christ. It was him using his close connections with John Paul 2 that subverted the catholic church and created islamic mercenery units to fight against christians around the world specifically Serbia and Russia. He is the director of ACPC and even wrote a 1998 book “The Grand Chessboard” that Russia should be divided into 3 parts.

  10. Lynda May 2, 2008 @ 3:26 pm

    Thank you Br. Nathanael for this report that goes right to the heart of the turmoils being universally engineered for our times. The Noachida and its courts of judgement for the nations is indeed the ordo of the ordo ab chao sworn by the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree (ordo ab chao) to the Elders of Zion.

    Albert Pike who died at his desk at the buildings of the Supreme Council in Washington:

    “The Secret Movers of the French Revolution (the Elders of Zion) had sworn to overturn both Throne [of Western Civilization – the HRE] and Altar upon the tomb of Jacques de Molay. When Louis XVI was executed, half the work was done; and thenceforth the Army of the Temple was to direct all efforts against the Pope.” 1871. Morals and Dogma, p 824.

    “The fight taking place between Catholicism and Freemasonry is a fight to the very death, ceaseless and merciless” Bulletin of the Grand Orient, France 1892, p. 183.

    Commenting on the many photgraphs of Pope Paul VI wearing the Ephod [Ex 28:6; 7, 25-26], Fr Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga SJ wrote in The New Montinian Church 1971:

    [He] “knows very well what this ‘Breastplate of Judgement’, the Ephod signifies; he knows its origins in the ritualistic dress of the Ancient Covenant…In their Messianic materialism, the directors of Judaism dream of an implementation of world government, wherein they are the masters and we are slaves. They recognize that the insurmountable wall that lies in the path of this prograam of conquest is the religious wall; in particular, the wall of the Catholic Church. By experience they know that slander, prisons, even death does not crush the faith…it only enlivens it; they know very well that in order to destroy the Church of Jesus Christ, they have only one road left..INFILTRATION. Thus, the case of Anacletus II is repeating itself. The infiltrators denounced by Pius X have invaded the hierarchy and even captured the Chair of Peter.”

    As a Roman Catholic adhering to Tradition and to the true Petrine Succession from Pope Gregory XVII since 1958 (when the coup occurred within the Conclave), I appreciate this research pointing out Benedict’s betrayal of our Lord Jesus Christ, our King who must reign until all enemies are under his feet, likewise, Benedict’s betrayal of the Church, all Christians and the nations to whom the Church is called to bear witness and to baptise, instruct and elevate into the universal Christian order that our Lord wills for all nations.

    For all these refs, and more complete discussion, please see the website published with the ecclesiastical approbation of the hierachy of the Church in Eclipse

  11. Lynda May 2, 2008 @ 4:02 pm

    “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist…the Church will be in eclipse.” Prophesy of the Blessed Virgin Mary at La Salatte, France confided to the Shepherdess Melaie Calvat in 1846 and published with imprimatur

    “The Church provides security because it is the ‘roccia’ (rock) – not thick and not sand. It deals with a significance that goes beyond the material sense of the metaphor: in fact rocks of the earth crumble in time, due to the effects of the elements. This ‘roccia’ (rock) will never crumble, nor flake, given that its solidity is guaranteed in the text of Mattew (16,18) until the end of time.

    The ‘rock’ remains…But on occasions, some men may take from others the vision of the rock. Other things may be made to seem like the rock, other things that may appear to all as such. The distinction is a profound one, even if the errors of these men are capable of veiling the reality (truth) they can not destroy it. The question, easy for all, that presents itself is one of the visibility of the ‘roccia’ (rock) in the Church – the consequences would be grave.

    Extract from La Roccia (The Rock) by Pope Gregory XVII, the hostage pope of the twentieth century. Publicly known as Cardinal Siri. La Roccia originally published in Revovatio II 1967, fasc 2, p. 183-184.

    Pope Gregorious XVII died May 2, 1989 a hostage of Masonic Revolution in the Catholic Church. Requiescat in Pace.

  12. Lynda May 2, 2008 @ 4:59 pm

    Hi Jonah,

    The Sanhedrin is now online and they have an entire section in English devoted to Noachida.

    This is specificly the Jerusalem Court of Issues of Bnei Noah. Beit Din L’inyanei Bnei Noah.

    This is a must read for all one worlders and novus ordinarians.

  13. Kay May 2, 2008 @ 11:21 pm

    A few years ago the Pope made an appearance in a city in Mexico. Many poor, hungry, Christian believers came to see a wealthy, well fed man who sat upon a golden throne and wore a gold crown. Yet the man who sat upon the golden throne did not sell his belongings to feed the hungry crowd of believers. He kept his wealth to himself and the crowd remained poor and hungry, yet still many believed in a religion called Catholic. Jesus would have feed the crowd with whatever means possible. And a true man a Christ would have done the same. But the man adorned with gold went back to his castle of gold. Perhaps this new Pope is kissing tale of the financial masters, the zionists, to stay alive and enjoy his financial prosperity, powerful status, that only kissing zionist tale will bring. Like the liar John Hague.

  14. Lynda May 3, 2008 @ 12:05 am


    If Mexico is in poverty (and it is) that is because a once prosperous Catholic nation with a flourishing economy and culture was overthrown by a Masonic revolution. Now, of course it is owned by a Zionist bank with an interest in making & keeping that nation poor and indebted. They are building a Soviet (NAU) and they need poor Mexicans to invade the U.S searching for food, a few dollars and life’s necessities.

    No pope has been coronated since Pius XII who died in 1958. The anti-popes of the novus ordo gave the papal tiara away to the U.N. in the 1970s.

    The bishops of the Church have held patriarchal thrones from the 1st century A.D. When the Christian faith was formally recognized by Constantine in the 4th century A.D. under the Edict of Milan, the Patriarchs of the Church and their bishops have publicly worn ceremonial dress as befitting Apostolic government.

    But when the government of a nation that once formally recognized Apostolic government is overthrown in a Masonic revolution (as in Mexico) then, of course, everyone wears a suit (including women) and enjoys laws that are against nature and God, social degeneration and poverty.

  15. Phillip A. Jones May 3, 2008 @ 3:52 am

    THE REAL SPIRITUAL JEW PLEASE STAND UP…’THEREFORE thou are inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou are that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things. But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things. And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgement of God? Or depisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance? But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; Who will render to every man according to his deeds: To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, Tribulation and aguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also the Gentile: For there is no respect of persons with God. For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be juged by the law; (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;) In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. Behold, thou are called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; And are confident that thou thyself are a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishoneourest thou God? For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written. For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose preaise is not of men, but of God.’

  16. America, the Beautiful May 3, 2008 @ 9:16 am

    I have to agree with the first poster, Repcrac, Benedict is far too intelligent to buy into any “elevating” Jews to a position of authority over Christians.

    So, IF as Ed suggests, it is just the first step in trying to subjugate Christianity to Judaism to eventually snuff it out – – – uh..Not gonna happen.

    Here is where we have to not jump from the frying pan into the fire.

    Let us all take a deep breath and remember that God is in charge.

    God has a plan.

    That plan involves his chosen people — which the New Testament describes as Believers — Christians.

    So others can plot, scheme . . .even achieve some successes — but they cannot win.

    God is in control and He will bring about the completion of HIS plan.

    Remember when Pilate said to Jesus: “Don’t you know that I have the power to kill you?”

    And Jesus replied, “You would have no power unless it were given to you from above.”

    Also — Romans 8 (paraphrased):

    “For those who love God, All things work together for the good.”

  17. Mark Brander May 3, 2008 @ 9:22 am

    Jesus came as a Lamb, but He will now return as a Lion. Read the warnings at He is about to return!

  18. Elhanan May 3, 2008 @ 10:26 am

    Considering the jewish Bolsheviks executed millions of Christians in Russia and abroad, why would these updated verisons of anti-Christian communistic laws be a surprise?

    I’m sure Americans would be proud to die for the jewish cause.

  19. America, the Beautiful May 3, 2008 @ 5:41 pm

    In exploring the La Salette apparitions, I ran across this interesting article on titled:

    La Salette: Sorting Fact from Fiction

  20. Lynda May 3, 2008 @ 10:35 pm

    “He [Benedict] doesn’t go so far as to equate the ancient Hebrews with today’s Jew’s, that would be tatamount to negating Christianity.”

    Exactly, Repcrac (May 2, 08). You are to be congratulated for having a Catholic grasp of this issue.

    Sadly, Benedict, as correctly reported in this article by Br. Nathanael Kapner and as documented on all the links does “go so far as to equate the ancient Hebrews with today’s Jews.”

    He equates the ancient Hebrews of the Exodus Passover and the Mosaic Covenant with the Jews of the Nazareth Synagoge where Jesus prayed with the Jewish congregation at Park East Synagogue. This is correctly reported and correctly documented.

    So, yes, Benedict does negate Negate the New Covenant which fulfills the ancient Covenants.

  21. Lynda May 3, 2008 @ 11:22 pm

    For those who might wish to explore the confidence of Our Lady to the Shepherdess Melanie Calvat at La Salette, the article on the above link: “La Salette – Sorting Fact from Fiction” is very heavy on fiction and lay opinion.

    There is a large body of writing on La Salette – much of it from ecclesiastical sources. Regrettably, the author of “La Salette” who is attempting to sort fact from fiction does not cite or evaluate any of it.

    The entire text of the La Salette confidence 1846, took Melanie Calvat virtually her entire life to get published with imprimatur. And it is now online.

    The first publication was on November 15, 1879 with the imprimatur of His Excellency Mgr Zola, Bishop of Lecce.

    Later the message was promoted by Pope Leo XIII.

    Most recently it has been re-issued under the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur by Most Reverend Donald W. Montrose, D.D. Oct 25, 1990. Now online at

    An authoritative comment that completely supports Our Lady’s prophesy is that of Henry Edward Cardinal Manning. The Present Crisis of Holy See. (London: Burns and Lambert) pp 87 – 90.

    “The apostacy of the City of Rome from the Vicar of Christ and its destruction by AntiChrist may be thoughts so new to many Catholics that I think it well to recite the text of the theologians of greatest repute…Malevenda, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar, Melos, Biegus, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostisize from the faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism…Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible, hidden in the catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers [East and West] of the early Church.”

    Our Lady’s statement that “Rome will lose the faith and become the Seat of the Anti-Christ” has never been interpreted against the Chair of Peter itself. Rather it has been interpreted to mean that the Chair will be overturned, the Holy See will be usurped and an Anti-Papacy favourable to the Beast System of world government will be set up over its temporal wreck.

    The Rock of Peter (Cepha) within the Chruch can never be destroyed, but the Chair can be overturned and an anti-papacy instituted over its usurpation in Rome.

    That, I submit to Br. Nathanael’s readers (who may find this of interest) is precisely what has happened.

  22. BUZZY B May 3, 2008 @ 11:26 pm

    HOW long are the CHRISTIANS going to let those arrogant Zionists piss on Christianity and try to make the piss seem like perfume? The Catholic Church does whatever benifits that BLOATED corrupt,wealthy beyond belief,octopus, that has 7 miles of papers under the Vatican that really belong to the WORLD!Give away the VATICAN and sell off your GOLD crosses. Christ was crusified on a wooden cross on Golgotha. No Gold,no Jewels, NO pomp. NO POPE!

  23. avenger May 4, 2008 @ 12:05 am

    what good do you expect from those people? wouldn’t they try to kill jesus again if he comes again? they are cursed by god forever. and they are not chosen. it’s their lie.. they serve to satan and their synagoges became the synagoges of satan.

  24. America, the Beautiful May 5, 2008 @ 12:36 pm

    Buzzy B,

    In insulting the Catholic Church, you have insulted Brother Nathaniel, a Greek Orthodox monk who is more closely aligned theologically with the Church in Rome than are the 38,000 plus protestant denominations who still cannot decide who their biblical “authority” is.

    When they FINALLY do, they will make the Journey Home to the Chair of Peter.

  25. America, the Beautiful May 7, 2008 @ 7:24 am

    I think that when it comes to watching how the Pope interacts with Jews and/or any other ethnic group, we have to keep in mind some basic fundamental truths.

    The Pope is the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of Christ on earth as ordained essentially by Christ Himself in handing over the Keys to the Kingdom to Saint Peter and his successors.

    The Church has been given a Promise by Christ that the Holy Spirit would lead it into all Truth . . . and “that the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

    Here we can confidently put our trust in God, through Christ and the Holy Spirit, in that, we are not trusting a human being to achieve perfection but are trusting God for His Promise to Believers.

    Let’s look at what we do know.

    We know that God chose the Israelites, he chose David and his seed, to bring forth the Messiah.

    Christians know that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. However, most Jews are not yet convinced.

    We do know that it is God’s intention to save as many as possible including, maybe even especially, Jews.

    We are at a unique time in history.

    The Pope, as Christ’s ambassador on earth, is reaching out to Orthodox Jews in a particular way — we should listen to the Holy Spirit within our hearts.

    Showing Christian kindness, honoring a people for their long history of honoring God to the best of their ability, is not “bowing to the Jews.”

    It is no different than when Jesus reached out to the Samaritan woman at the well.

    He was not authorizing a pagan lifestyle.

    He was reaching out to bring her into the Light. As Christians, We MUST be able to discern the difference — or we will effectively miss God’s call on our life. We will not be useful instruments to Him if we do not understand that reaching out in Love is different than capitulating where doctrin is concerned.

    The Pope is reaching out in love and concern for those Jews who honor God.

    You do not “reach out in love” by first putting a stick in someone’s eye.

    It may be that you will have to give them the tougher medicine of “Truth” — after, you have validated their dignity as a person.

    Now why would I, a cradle Catholic, believe that God is reaching out to Orthodox Jews? What about secular Jews, etc..?

    In my personal opinion, I believe that Orthodox Jews have turned their hearts to God. They are seeking Him in an ever stronger way and trying to serve Him in the way they know best at the present.

    For them, it is the Jewish Law.

    Of course, this is something all Christians believe Christ came to set us free from.

    However, Jesus also said, “I did not come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it.”

    Therefore, the Law is not a bad thing, it is merely an incomplete thing.

    As a citizen who reads my bible, prays and tries to follow My Lord — I see the Pope reaching out to Orthodox Jews as an Act of Mercy on God’s part.

    He is attempting a bridge between an ethnic/religious group that has been at odds for many centuries.

    As it is, Christ wishes to reveal Himself to modern day Orthodox Jews.

    I believe He wants the veil lifted. He wants to open their eyes to a new reality for them — but has been waiting for them for over 2000 years to comprehend.

    He will use their Law to reveal himself to them. Just as He did 2000 years ago, and, those “that had eyes to see and ears to hear” . . . did.

    I believe that Orthodox Jews are in a unique position to come to this understanding.

    I find these times quite exciting actually.

    However, I feel differently about secular Jews.

    The reason being is that secular Jews tend to actually be atheists.

    I find them to be no different than other individuals who have rejected God and are attempting to place themselves and their own egos on a pedastal.

    They blantantly break the First Commandment by worshipping themselves in place of Almighty God.

    Unless they repent, they will pay a heavy price — as 5000 years of biblical history has proven.

  26. Lynda May 7, 2008 @ 3:00 pm

    America the Beautiful,

    I am sure everyone can agree with your sentiment.

    Christian sentiment, however, does not address the issues and facts of Brother Nathanael’s post. And from the facts which he documents, certain conclusions must be drawn.

  27. America, the Beautiful May 8, 2008 @ 6:51 am

    Jesus Christ offering the Jews forgiveness and Salvation is far more than just ‘a sentiment’; it goes to the very heart of the Gospel.

  28. Lynda May 8, 2008 @ 5:08 pm

    I think Br Nathanael’s point is that Benedict (whom I regard as anti-pope Benedict) is not offering the Jews forgiveness and salvation, but rather collaborating with them in error and leading others into error.

    Unless I have completely misread his report and its documentation, that is what is being stated.

    Generally speaking, I think it is a good Christian sentiment to build bridges of love and concern.

  29. Bob May 8, 2008 @ 5:27 pm

    “Pope Affirms Zionist Noahide Laws In NYC!”

    Where is the “source” for this news? Where are the news stories about it?

    Bob / Spikazens

  30. admin May 8, 2008 @ 6:11 pm

    Dear Bob,

    Are you blind?

    Go back and read through the article *again* and CLICK on all of the links I give as sources. +Brother Nathanael

  31. Lynda May 8, 2008 @ 7:58 pm


    This is a terrible statement and contradictory to sacred Scripture and the teaching of the Church.

    Telling people they are cursed by god forever is not what this website is about.

    “I say then: Hath God cast away his people [Israel]? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin..” Romans 11:1

    “If I say then, have they [Israel] so stumbled, that they should fall? God forbid. But by their offence, salvation is come to the Gentiles that they may be emulous of them.

    “Now if the offense of them [Israel] be the riches of the world, and the diminution of them, the riches of the Gentiles; how much more the fullness of them [Israel]?

    “For I say you, Gentiles: as long indeed as I am the apostle of the Gentiles I will honour my ministry.

    If by any means, I may provoke to emulation them who are my flesh and may save some of them.

    For if the loss of them [Israel] be the reconciliation of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?” Romans 11:11-15

  32. America, the Beautiful May 9, 2008 @ 7:02 am

    I always defend Brother Nathanael, but on this one I do not believe his perception of what the Pope is doing is right.

    I believe that the Pope is following the promptings of the Holy Spirit in reaching out — I do not believe that he is compromising Christian doctrine, but may be shedding insight upon ancient scriptures that many until now have not realized.

    For example, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception has always been, however; it was not fully developed until the mid 18th century when the Blessed Virgin appear to Saint Bernadette.

    If we trust the Holy Spirit to guide the Church, we should not be nervous about who the Pope meets with.

    Jesus was frequently judged by the scribes and Pharisees for meeting and dining with sinners.

    It was Christ that taught us that we are not guilty by association. That is a worldly concept.

    Christ came to break the bonds of the Evil One over this world. So that those who follow Christ have a renewed mind and no longer use the world’s standards to determine validity — but now we use Gospel standards.

    Pope Benedict is one of the most theologically grounded popes to occupy the Chair of Peter in a number of centuries.

    God will use him to reach out to our older brothers in the Faith and to all others who sincerely seek God.

    May we all work tirelessly to achieve the Unity that Christ prayed for before he died.

    It was His sincere desire that we all be One, as He and the Father are One.

    Let us not as faithful Christians, grieve the Holy Spirit but instead TRUST that His ways are not our ways.

    I always rest peacefully at night knowing that God is God and, I am not.

  33. InSiSt May 13, 2008 @ 11:26 am

    This is an astonishing interesting site. I would like to leave comments here, but how many words is maximum – in case I would have to divide up? I have fought with my past and former standpoint, and I have found important answers of my questions. May I….?

  34. admin May 13, 2008 @ 11:33 am

    Dear InSiSt – Go ahead, make your comments so long as there is no foul language used, nor ad hominems. +BN

  35. admin May 13, 2008 @ 11:39 am

    Dear Ed,

    You wrote: “Ben-Chaim cites Isaiah’s prophecy that someday Gentiles will flock to Jerusalem to ‘learn Torah.’ ”

    This is an errant interpretation of Isaiah’s prophecy and is taken out of context. The import of Isaiah’s prophecy is that the “law would go forth out of Jerusalem” and that “the Messiah would be a light unto the Gentiles.” This is the Gospel that was preached “beginning at Jerusalem” by the apostles bringing the message of salvation to all peoples.

    This is in contradistinction from the “law that came from Mt Sinai,” that is, the law of Moses which has been superceeded by Jesus Christ’s New Testament to the Jews and Gentiles.

    The prophecies of Isaiah must be taken as one piece and the book to be read many times over and understood as the Church Fathers teach it. I myself have read the Book of Isaiah over 500 times beginning as a child having been raised in Judaism but then embracing Christ at the age of 21.

    I have poured over the Church Fathers’ teaching of the Book of Isaiah especially that of the 2nd Century patristic writings of St Justin Martyr in his “Dialogue With Trypho The Jew” of which I still read a chapter every morning. +BN

  36. kevin May 13, 2008 @ 11:41 am

    Dear Sir,

    Last night on the History channel on the program Crucifixion, the History channel says it was the Romans who spied on, ordered the arrest and crucifixion of Jesus without mention of the jews. Can you tell me who owns the History channel and how is it that they can use revisionism on the Bible and not on the holocaust? Thank you

  37. admin May 13, 2008 @ 11:47 am

    Dear Kevin – I do not know who owns the History channel. But I do know that the Jews own American mainstream media.

    The Bible states that the Jews brought Christ to Pilate and even when he wished to release Him as being innocent of the trumped up charges the Jews cried, “Crucify Him Crucify Him! His blood be upon us an upon our children.

    No matter what the History Channel says or for that matter any of the garbage history books fed us in America’s educational system beginning from nursery school, the Deicidal Curse is still upon the Jews until they say, “Blessed Is He Who Cometh In The Name Of The Lord,” that is Jesus Christ as predicted in Deuteronomy Chapter 18. +BN

  38. InSiSt May 13, 2008 @ 12:47 pm

    ART I
    I am living in Europe in a country with strong Protestant tradition. I experienced a salvation renewal at my early twenties after being a “prayers child” of my mother for many years. – This experience was the experience of the Personal Christ in my life – in such a way that everything else became secondary of importance – and it helped me loose of tight personal ropes.

    As many others I became entangled by the interest of the future prophecies of the coming of Christ and – the importance of the State of Israel. As pointed out on this website I did not have any knowledge or experience with the inside Judaism, therefore like many others I gradually was formed by the immediate picture of the Judaism from mass media and people adhering to the present standpoint of Israel, which I later gradually learned is the zionist one.

    Gradually I became aware of a striking appearance of this standpoint or view: The people preaching it did not seem free in the inner soul, thus contrasting my experience as renewed Christian. They were trapped in way that reminded me about the way the Pharisees talked and behaved. And the professors of this view was evangelical Christians. This made it harder for me to get out of it.

    At the same time I gradually started to rise questions: “Is this the right understanding of this matter…really?” And one of the things I reacted upon was that if anybody questioned the claim that the Israel of 1948 was the Biblical fullfillment of a promise by God in the Old Testament and of the New as well, they would seriously be confronted and most likely be rejected from the community.

    I came – not going into details here, as I find these details covered in this website,(and this was surprising to me, since it came from a “Jew”) – gradually to the understanding that there was no spiritual Gods People, where the Christian was just the spiritual Gods People, but the Jews the only real Gods People. But there was only one People like Ephesians 2, says, and that the true Jews were the Jews God Himself Of His Own Might decided to be Jews, circumcized in krypto, and not by men,Romans 2.

    But I did not dare to reject the State of Israel, because this was like rejecting Christ himself, but I had my first feelings that something was complete wrong with the whole concept.

    The surprising website that helped me through was .
    This page, to my astonishment, was written by ortodox Jews, and they took the standpoint I did not dare to take: The State of Israel was an Ateist State and they put a blinking stop sign over the flag. I was out of my mind of surprise, and finally everything resolved as to my inner understanding. Their arguments also were striking, and suddenly I had the opportunity to start to thank the Jews for their help getting out of my trap. – Now, of course I understand that these ortodox Jews do not acknowledge Christ as the Lord, but this was an very important beginning for me. So much the more when I continued into a website where an Ortodox Christian Jew hold the same view as to the matter of Israel. So I said to myself: “If ortodox Jews reject the State of Israel and Zionism, and an Ortodox Christian Jew does the same – and they have completely different view on Christ, then this matter must be proven!”
    I will try to come back with more on 1)reformed theology and 2)humanism that will explain the doublegrip the devil has on Christian society. Because there are 2 different fronts the devil are pushing on to get through with his AntiChristPlan.

  39. Brenda May 13, 2008 @ 1:34 pm


    I post the following link for your benefit. Hopefully a fellow Traditionalist can speak to your concerns regarding the Pope’s authority in Christian tradition.

    God’s peace be with you, here is the link:

  40. Lynda May 14, 2008 @ 1:20 am

    For reasons that appear on another thread, I see no point in discussing anything with you, Brenda.

    If you had read anything I have posted you would know that I do not have any concerns regarding the authority of the pope.

    This thread is no about the authority of the pope as a doctrine of the Catholic faith. This thread is about the legitimacy of Benedict XVI who claims to be pope. I deny this claim for reasons that I have stated and documented in many places.

    I have never stated in any post that I deny the legitmate pope’s authority. I have consistently stated (and given evidence – which obviously you do not accept) that on the basis of the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church and the canons of the Church and historical witness that John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and Benedict XVI could not possibly be popes anymore than recognized anti-pope John XXIII (mach 1) could possibly have been the pope.

    I do not believe you are a person of good will Brenda. I think it very likely that you belong to the Rabbinic cult – Opus Dei in the novus ordo post conciliar church – a sect that has alienated itself from the Catholic faith.

  41. Brenda May 14, 2008 @ 10:42 am


    It truly saddens me as a Christian that you impune my character suggesting that I am not a person of good will.

    You would have no way of knowing really, only God can know the heart.

    I am not part of a Rabbinic cult, thank you, and neither am I part of Opus Dei.

    You do not have a gift for discernment. Be aware of that because Satan will lead you into all sorts of spiritual detours making you think that you do.

    I merely posted the link hoping that it would be helpful, but you are not a kind-spirited person, so I apologize for assuming that you would be.

    I will not bother you again.

  42. InSiSt May 14, 2008 @ 10:54 am

    ART II
    First of all I have to say the the way I came to this website was through a link on a Neo-nazi website. That is where I found You. Surprising, but many different kind of people see the danger of Zionism, which is another proof on the matter.
    I just noted that the address fell out of the former posting.(ART I)

    I do not know how well the Americans understand the difference between branches of protestant theology, but to make some aspects of it shortly: what we call Evangelical theology is the Lutheran Evangelical Theology, and this differ from what we call Reformed Theology that evolved from Calvin and especially Zwingli, the Swiss theologians of the 1500 century reformation. This latter theology has roots in the Reformed Church, but in Lutheran theology we do not link this theology with the Ref.Church as such, but rather take aspects of the Reformed Churchs Theology in consideration as to how this theology lives in the Lutheran Evangelical Churches and causes detrimental effects on the christology there. Therefore, evangelical and reformed theology can be so many things, but over here we classify them in 2 important ways as to functional dogmatics. By functional dogmatics I mean the way the dogmatics has influence upon practical understanding for our Christian lives, which may be detrimental or constructive for maturing Christianity.

    – Ref.theol:
    1)One important base of RT is that it maintains that the Bible is our Bible. (This is true, but it is also untrue.) The consequence of this is that the Old Testament is an equal lateral to the New Testament. When this becomes a dogma the OT will gradually devour and eat up the NT. As follows, the content of the NT will vanish in favour of the OT. This again has several side effects: Our Christians lives will be forced into what we call lawishness, which gradually kills the life of freedom and the power of Christs Spirit in our lives. Secondly, when the Christian concept of our new birth as the only true citizenship of Gods Kingdom is destroyed, the Judaistic fleshly (man-made) citizenship is the natural consequence and only possibility left for us. But this latter base is impossible as long as we are not Jews and cannot become it, unless we go over to the conformed Torah tradition. We are left in a desert as Christians, and the only thing we can hope for is to become “water-bearers” in a slavery for Judaism.

    2)Another feature of RT is the tendency for them to divide the Oneness of Christ into separate entities: body, soul and spirit; gentiles, jews and the church. A well known church historian side effect is that the body becomes of no importance and rather becomes an enemy to the spirit. The holy sacrament is degraded to a spiritual (Calvin) and symbolic (Zwingli) meaning, depriving the power of communion with Christ.

    The gospel of John says that to become real citizens of Gods Kingdom we have to be born not by Jews (by flesh) but born by God. John ch 1. This is the true meaning of the born again concept, but to-day most Christians regard this as a bare spiritual or symbolic way of beeing citizens of His Kingdom. Other than that it has no real meaning. This is a wrong understanding, because birth of God makes us to true Israelites – there is no other alternative left for mankind to day. So both Jews and Gentiles and Israelis have to get through this maindoor to get into the only relationship with God there is to be for all men, regardless of their old birth. Before you had to be a state citizen of the old Israel to have share in their blessings. That is what the apostle Paulus tells us, and to-day the same consequence of the zionistic theology is left for us: if Israel is Gods chosen people, I will have to become a citizen of the State of Israel to be a Christian. Other possibilities does not exist.

    – Ev.theol:
    The Evangelical theology teaches that the Bible is a living(activ) new testament replacing the old testament. As brutal as that. The Apostle Paul points to many places in OT proving that not a single time in history has this point been unclear: that first of all the heart has to be a “Jew”. It does not help with formalistika on an outer level if the heart is wrong. So far the inidividual life. When the Jews together with their christian allied want Israels land, they do the same mistake as the isralites did when they demanded a king on their premises and of their will. They got Saul, which was not prepared for the task. He fell. But remember, Saul also was annointed and danced in prophetic trance as a proof of being a messiah. The miracle of building up Israels land can stand as a miracle, but that is not enough. The chapter 18 of Deut has to be read in conjuntion with chapt 13. This has been formerly pointed out on this website by +BN, and I should not have to mention it.
    The prof Jeremias also told about the change that was going to take place: Ch 31 is well known about a new testament/covenant replacing the old, and also 3,16 which states that they should not think about the holy ark, and it should not any more be made a such ark. This is meant as an imperative only, because it is possible to build a new one, if one will, and that is what the zionists will do or may already have done.

    So ev.theol. tells that with the coming of the NT, the OT is the end of it. The letter of Hebrews tells that clearly, and the only Jerusalem there is to be is the Jerusalem up there (Heb.12,Gal.4). And the apostle Paul tells us that our Kingdom is in the heavens (Fil.3) and Christ says that his Kingdom is not of this world (John 18). It is impossible to try to do over again the OT history. I did not work, says the Hebrew Letter,it was just a shadow of the real things that is to come. That is one reason why the zionizts and their christian allied never can succeed. But they will succeed in getting AntiChrist forth. Every attempt to go back to the old covenant will be captured by the devil and his might. God is not there anymore. He says that only through My Son from now on shall ye have peace with me and protection. Our bodies are the only temple for the Lord,the only temple (Jesaia 66).

    – Humanism penetrating the church:
    Humanism teaches that there is no God. The only certain knowledge we have is that man exist, therefore everything has to be measured with man, all values. The conclusion is that since only man exists (for sure) there can be no absolute crossing an individual in favour of another individual. Therefore what is true for me is my truth and what is true for you is your truth. This makes it impossible to state anything as absolute and as objective truth. The Zionism and modern Judaism use this prinsiple working for a multicultural mix-max where everybody are allowed to do anything as long as it does not concern your neighbour. This is a policy working forth the coming of AntiChrist, the secret of lawlessness.

    So we have two fronts working against the Christianity: 1. Reformed theology with its mechanisms working forth the Jews and Judaism and Zionism as the only true people and land of God, based on the flesh. The Pro-Israel Christians are of those.
    2. The humanism with its relativism allowing everybody and everything to have their proper right existing.( Homosexuality,pornography and all kinds of perverities.)

  43. Lynda May 14, 2008 @ 4:30 pm


    I stand by my previous comments.

    If you wish to understand why, please refer to “Why Am I Called an Anti-Semite” and then scroll down to April 22 and the very personal insults you directed to me. These are entirely gratuitous and have no bearing on the matter of the discussion on that thread.

    Rather than address the enormous issues raised by the comment, discussion and evidence on the question of Benedict’s papacy – is it legitimate?, you consistently deflect and twist and try to make this discussion about the doctrines of the papacy itself. Or you resort to personal denunciations.

    As a Catholic, I do not question the validity of what the Catholic Church teaches about the papacy.

    I have never said (nor do I think) that I have the gift of Spiritual discernment. I only say what I think and I stand by “I do not believe you are a person of good will”.

    “Not to oppose error is to approve it” Pope St Felix III – is a website approved by the bishops of Pope Gregory XVII to warn everyone about the tactics of this rabbinic cult that holds the status of a personal prelature under the anti-papacy currently based in Rome.

    I have stated previously that I would have no further discussion with you, Brenda and I welcome your closure on this matter “I will not bother you again”

    Thank youk, Brenda. I think that is entirely appropriate.

  44. admin May 14, 2008 @ 9:57 pm

    Dear InSiSt,

    You wrote that you found this link on a neo nazi site. I do NOT approve of neo-nazism as it is Anti Christian.

    Web sites are free to use my link. I cannot control that.

    BUT – I, Brother Nathanael Kapner REPUDIATE & DENOUNCE Neo-nazism, Nazism, White Supremacy, National Socialism, as they all are antithetical to the Christian message of Christ’s offer of salvation to *all* of the human race – and the Church made up of all peoples, all ethnicities, all races!

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner

  45. InSiSt May 15, 2008 @ 3:14 am

    Dear BN Kapner,
    as to neonazism that is NOT a link I wanted to have your website associated with. What I meant to say is that even those kind of people can see the danger of Zionism, but very few of Christians and Jews. Thus the Word of Christ: “Truly I say unto you,publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of God before you”.
    I regret the association. I am not able to erase that passage from your site, you would have to do it for me.

  46. InSiSt May 16, 2008 @ 9:32 am

    BN “Kapner is a nut. He is a clown.”
    This is the impression we get when we first stumble into his website. But when we read what he actually is saying and meaning, the whole impression changes. Here we have a man in solid foundation with the implicit and explivit content of the New Testament, with solid knowledge of the Jewish tradition inside and outside, that like the Apostle Paulus “14 years later again went up to Jerusalem”. And Kapner is now telling a story that most people of the “gojim” Christians did not dare to tell, beacuse like Peter we were “afraid of those of the circumcision and withdraw” when we should stand up and fight against Judaism that is holding people down, daring to go against it. The ropes of fear has been tying us up, not allowing us to dare to preach what the Spirit of Christ dwelling inside us first taught us.-
    BN Kapner have given us (gojim) courage to not be afraid. Again I must say: Kapners site is astonishing, because it fearlessly attacks the heart of sin among the Jews, and the more because he is a former Jew himself. There is no Jew-hate, because we know what happens to man when he repents and converts towards Christ. God The Trinity becomes our God and Father sharing his nature with us. -2 Pet.1-

  47. Ed of St Lou. July 30, 2008 @ 9:03 am

    Vatican 2 Antipopes Freemasons and Jews?

    John 23RD is suspected of being a Freemason and possibly a Jew. Those who support him like the information below, admit that many suspect him of of being a Freemason. His revolutionary stances, his asscociations with Masonry and Jews causes some to question him.

    Sedevacantist and Conclavist groups have been some of Pope John’s most outspoken critics. Some groups have even made unsubstantiated claims that John was a Freemason, and as such, allegedly could not be a valid Pope since Catholics are prohibited from joining Freemasonry under pain of excommunication. On that basis one group, the U.S. Washington State-based true Catholic Church elected its only priest as “pope” in 1998, claiming that there had been no valid pope since Pope Pius XII died in 1958.

    Some also make the claim that John’s choice of regnal name marked him as an antipope, as the name John had lain unused since Antipope John XXIII used it in the 15th century (other Popes have similarly used names taken by anti-popes, for example Benedict XIV).
    Links of John 23RD possibly being a Freemason and a Jew.

    This link demonstrates that almost all of the Vatican 2 Popes may have been Freemasons and possibly Jews. This includes the present fraud Benny! The monks in New York proved that Paul 6TH was Jewish. They have pictures of him wearing the Jewish EPHOD on his garments. They have pictures of his mother’s grave, on the tombstone is jewish and masonic symbols. John Paul two had relatives named Katz. When I was young the Jews in St.Louis had Katz drugstores all over this City. The bottome line is that the Vatican two anti-Popes are Freemasons, and most likely Jews. This is why Benny would promote the Noahide Laws. These Noahide Laws will eventually kill almost all of us who are not Lubavitcher Jews. We will be BEHEADED as St. Paul and St.James the Greater was in the early Church.

  48. Mack Bee August 16, 2008 @ 10:03 am

    Just further proof to me that Bugs Benny is not a true Pope. May God in His mercy send us a true Pope soon!

  49. Peter December 28, 2008 @ 10:14 pm

    People who can see the truth in Pope Benedict’s visit see it simply: His purpose was to recognize whatever truth lie in the hearts of the people and land he visited, period. Plain and simple.

    He does not condone the goals of the Zionist regime any more than John Paul condoned the religious practices of the Haitian voodoo priests when he visited Haiti. If the pope in his visits can find some common ground, even if it is for social reform– anything to improve the basic rights everyone deserves from the cradle to the grave — he will visit.

    People then do what is only human (and very sad) and that is to distort intentions to mix truth with disinformation and sometimes outright lies that only serve to cause more confusion or reinforce established biases to begin with. The pope is no dummy, his intention is not to make matters worse but to do whatever he can by his presence to further peace. Let the people who have their heads and hearts in the right place see truth and not more piles of twisted media presentations.

  50. Palehorse May 25, 2009 @ 10:10 pm

    Ratzinger is a jew freemason

  51. Michelle November 24, 2009 @ 9:29 am

    I can see where they would want to influence non-Jews toward a belief system that is less hostile to their own interests.

    What I don’t get is why they are pushing the Noahide Laws over the Ten Commandments which sums up every man’s responsibility to God and his neighbor. It seems to me that all the problems of the world would go away if everyone observed the Ten Commandments and obeyed them.

    Another thing I don’t get is why the Jews aren’t more evangelical with non-Jews, like the other two Abrahamic faiths.

    I understand that keeping the Jewish bloodline is important, but this doesn’t seem very practical to their own interests.

    Inbreeding has caused many couple the anguish of Tay-Sachs, for example. A large pool of unrelated fellow believers would alleviate that.

    History has proven that demography is destiny and one would think that Jews would seek to increase their numbers even if they had to implement an unofficial caste system where everyone is Jewish to varying degrees much like Latin America has done with Mestijaze.

    However, like everywhere else, the higher you go up the hierarchy of power, the purer the racial bloodline.

  52. jji December 7, 2009 @ 6:18 pm

    Michelle you might get your answers here .

    The Ten Commandments were meant for the Jews while the 7 Noahide laws were given to the gentiles, it is found in the bible through or on every transgressions.

    If you are to follow the 10 commandments that would mean that you need to keep the Shabbat or Sabbath, which is I think from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday.

    You know what that would also mean, you must not work, which is quite impractical for me. Which is why I’ll stick with the 7 categorical laws or the 65 laws.

    When you are at the site trying searching first maybe you’ll find an answer.

  53. gene December 26, 2009 @ 1:02 am

    America The Beautiful,

    Perhaps us 38,000 Protestant churches will decide who our “biblical authority is when you and Lynda decide who yours is.

    You say Benedict sits in the chair of Peter, Lynda says the chair has been overturned. Seems there is not a whole lot of agreement between Catholics.

    But as to the Pope departing from the faith, perhaps you could tell me the name of the pontiff who said this was an impossibility. Can we conclude that his was not an infallible doctrine?

    I am also curious to know if Peter is the rock upon whom the church is built, how can the church continue to exist if it no longer sits upon a rock?

    Thank you for bearing with me in my protestant unenlightenment.

  54. JIMnyc December 30, 2009 @ 8:34 pm

    Great website I stumbled upon.

    Yeah right.

    I’d like to see them try to apply their anti-Christ (noahide) laws here in Howard Beach and Bayridge, Whitestone, Bayside. We can guarantee them the FULL WRATH of the old time street justice laws.

    What do they think that people are just going to sit back and bow down to these smelly creeps?

    Bring it on.

  55. Ebner January 25, 2010 @ 2:44 am

    ” jji –

    December 7, 2009 @ 6:18 pm

    Michelle you might get your answers here .

    The Ten Commandments were meant for the Jews while the 7 Noahide laws were given to the gentiles, it is found in the Bible through or on every transgressions.

    If you are to follow the 10 commandments that would mean that you need to keep the Shabbat or Sabbath, which is I think from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday.

    You know what that would also mean, you must not work, which is quite impractical for me. Which is why I’ll stick with the 7 categorical laws or the 65 laws.

    When you are at the site trying searching first maybe you’ll find an answer.”

    Let us not forget, breaking one of the Ten Commandments requires what?

    Breaking any one of the Noahide laws is punishible by death — decapitation specifically.

    Who defines these laws? Jews.

    Who administers punishment? Jews. And, naturally ‘these laws’ do not apply to them.

  56. Bill Wilson February 1, 2010 @ 4:32 pm

    In case you never read the book, the Noahide laws are what the Jerusalem Council decided Gentile believers were to follow.

    Acts15:17: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.

    18: Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.

    This is the foreword of the laws that Paul gave to the gentiles.G-d’s works from the beginning of the world includes laws that man must live by. Cain broke one of these laws by murdering his brother and was punished.If these basic laws did not exist, then what law did Cain break?What sin did he commit?

    19: Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:

    Verse 19 shows the decision of James that gentiles are not bound to the Torah laws.This is further elaborated in verse 24, where it says “to whom we gave no such commandment”
    20: But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.

    1Tim 5:19: Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.
    A definite reflection that it requires two or more witnesses to convict a man. In Torah law,there must be no less than two witnesses.This is part of the original 7 laws to establish courts of justice.

    Rom:13:9: For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

    This is a reflection of what Hillel wrote 100 years prior to Paul and 40 years prior to Jesus, “What you dislike yourself, do not do unto your neighbor”. It also reconfirms the Noahide laws listed below.

    Eph:4:28: Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.

    Is the first part of the Noahide laws

    The Seven Noachide Laws
    1) It is forbidden to eat a limb or any meat that was severed from a live animal.

  57. Deadmantalking March 16, 2010 @ 10:03 pm

    I InSiSt on InSiSt!

    So we have two fronts working against the Christianity: 1. Reformed theology with its mechanisms working forth the Jews and Judaism and Zionism as the only true people and land of God, based on the flesh. The Pro-Israel Christians are of those.

    2. The humanism with its relativism allowing everybody and everything to have their proper right existing. ( Homosexuality, pornography and all kinds of perversions.)

    Indeed, they call (2) “diversity”, and protect sodomites with the “charter of rights and freedoms.” All too often we hear of “dangerous offenders” being released from jails back into the public. They also preach “tolerance.”

    Well, tolerance is NOT a virtue — patience is a virtue. Tolerance? If the zoo was ever to announce that they were going to release one of their tigers to roam the city, wouldn’t somebody raise some kind of objection? Then why do they release a man that they themselves claim to be a “dangerous offender?” Which brings us to front (1)… 😉

  58. czarina March 23, 2011 @ 9:30 am

    Was Pope Ratzinger a member of Hitler youth? What does that mean for the Catholic church?

  59. ifoundisrael April 24, 2011 @ 4:48 pm

    Excellent article Bros. Nathaniel. I am amazed, but not surprised at the demonic nature of Noahide laws.

    It is so appalling. Your response to Alexandra was spot on because just as Ed posted, that racial & Christian Zionism is I pray for each and every believer of Christ for the great tribulation that is going to come.

    Also, thank you for sharing what YAH revealed to you about 70AD. Ruach HaKodesh led me to that point of my studies because of what you wrote about the tribulation, that was the start of the hundred years where Christians were persecuted the greatest more than any other group in history.

    Thank you for sharing the info about the tribulation. A couple of years ago YAH woke me up to the truth because I started to read what Yeshua taught in the Gospels. Through Ruach HaKodesh, my eyes were opened to the false doctrine of dispensation.

    BTW, “JEWS” origins in 2 Kings 16:6 & 2 Kings 17:21-40.

    May YAH Bless and keep us all.

  60. Maurice March 25, 2012 @ 12:18 pm

    Chabad Rabbi Leaves Purim-Celebrating ‘Noahide’ to Die of Alcohol Poisoning Outside his Gate:

    “If we see that a Gentile’s life is in danger, we should not save him.” (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avodah Kochavim, 10:1)

  61. Suseneh January 11, 2013 @ 1:12 pm

    The Maurice Pinay Blog does a lot to expose the Catholic Noachide relationship.

  62. Ralph November 18, 2013 @ 8:12 am

    These “laws” are a construct of the Jewish Talmud and are not biblical.

    Any attempt to supersede the Ten Commandments or the law that Jesus taught is corrupt and sinful.

    One thing that the Bible makes clear is that the law and the Law Giver are One.

    The so called Noahide laws are in no way “revelatory” like the Ten Commandments. It is horrible that after centuries of Judaism and Christianity that many believers still do not get the point!

  63. S. Wesley Mcgranor January 23, 2015 @ 3:56 pm

    And as an extension of such or vice-versa, I believe that the three new sins on the Roman Catholic cannon were devised.

    1. Social injustice or oppression
    2. Environmental pollution
    3. Cruelty to animals.

    Now before these were mere matters of conscience?

    I am a fundamentalist Protestant (not Reformed nor Lutheran, and not Evangelical but Mainline) and I am sure that the spirit of the law is greater than the letter regardless.

  64. Jay December 18, 2015 @ 3:20 am

    The Jews took over the Catholic Church during the Inquisition.

    Pope John Paul II was a Jew, every Pope after him in Jewish fashion until forced otherwise will be Jew.

    The current is a Jew and all future Pope’s will be Jews.

    The light of God was not placed into the Jews during the Inquisition years and Jews superficially parading as Christians have completely taken over the Catholic Church.

  65. Michael April 13, 2017 @ 12:10 pm

    Don’t be deceived Christians.

    There isn’t going to be a pre-tribulation rapture, Christ will appear after the tribulation and Christians will have to go through it.

    Prepare yourselves because you won’t be prepared if you believe you will be “raptured” out.

    Christ is coming at the end of the seven years last week of Daniel chapter 9. Go serve God the Father and Jesus by telling others the good news of the Gospel. Today is still the day of salvation. Count it all joy when you are accounted worthy to suffer for Christ.

    There isn’t any escaping the tribulation for the Christians living at that time. That isn’t our time. Our time is to go and share the Gospel with everyone we meet.

Leave a comment