Main Contents

America’s War On White Christians

Brother Nathanael Channel Videos!, BroVids

America’s War On White Christians
June 29 2021

Watch: ‘Censor-Free!’ HERE!

More +BN Vids!

Defense Chief Touts Pride Filth Here!

Biden’s Queer Military Here!

Biden’s Slew Of Jews Here!

Black Lives Matter-Who Benefits? Here!

+BN Classics!

Trump’s Jews And Generals Here!

Hiding A Military Dictatorship Here!

+BN Vids Archive! HERE!
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Secure Donation Form

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Brother Nathanael @ June 29, 2021


  1. Brother Nathanael June 29, 2021 @ 9:55 pm


    America’s War On White Christians

    What’s fat, stupid, and dressed in a military uniform?

    A general making a total ass out of himself.

    Mark Milley is his name, chief military adviser to the president, and head of the Joint Chiefs Of Staff.

    If he wasn’t so dangerous you’d have a really good laugh. [Clip]

    [”Um, sure. Um, first of all, on the issue of critical race theory, etc, I, I’ll obviously have to get much smarter on whatever the theory is. Um, but I do think it’s important, actually, uh, for those of us in uniform to be open-minded and be widely read.”]

    The idiot admits he doesn’t know what Critical Race Theory is yet he defends it.

    Who’s he working for?

    The people?

    Or the Jews who want to annihilate the one political bloc that could potentially oppose them? [Clip]

    [”The United States Military Academy is a university, and it is important that we train and we understand, uh, and I, I, want to understand white rage, and I’m white and I want to understand it. So, what is it that caused thousands of people to assault this building and try to overturn the Constitution of the United States of America? What caused that? I want to find that out.”]

    Not only fat and stupid, he’s a liar, too.

    “Thousands” did not “assault” the Capitol building.

    “A few hundred,” (FBI plants notwithstanding), “unarmed,” entered the Capitol building opened to them by Capitol guards, to Constitutionally protest the fraudulent election that put an unpopular, leftist, senile old pervert into the White House.

    That is not “white rage.”

    It’s a “citizens’ page” out of “We The People” telling the government that when it ceases to represent the voice of the people it becomes an organ of tyranny.

    Milley digs deeper into his ignoramus brain. [Clip]

    [”I’ve read Mao Tse Tung. I’ve read Karl Marx. I’ve read Lenin. That doesn’t make me a communist. So what is wrong with understanding, having some situational understanding, about the country for which we are here to defend. And I personally find it offensive that we are accusing the United States Military, our general officers, our commissioned, non-commissioned officers of being quote ‘woke’ or something else because we’re studying some theories that are out there.”]

    If it’s so important for Milley to ‘understand white rage’ then why doesn’t he command his officers to read social theorists?

    Like Aristotle’s “Politics,” Nicholas Wade’s “Race And Human History,” or even Dr David Duke’s “My Awakening,” just to have some ’situational understanding?’

    Because the Jews would fire his fat ass in nothing flat.

    He is so replaceable, you know.

    An affirmative-actionated schwartza shilling for the Jews can read the Jewish script just as well. [Clip]

    [”Hello, everyone. I’m Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense. I want to thank you for participating in this stand down, and I thank your leadership for supporting this important initiative. I also want you to share with your leadership your own personal experiences with encountering extremist and extremist ideology in the military should you have any. And I want your leadership to listen to those stories. And I want them to listen to any ideas that you might have to help us stamp out of the ranks the dangerous conduct that this ideology inspires.”]

    He’s turning troops into snoops.

    All the White Christian Trumpsters in each and every barrack will be snitched on via Austin’s exact orders to stamp out White Christians in the military.

    What’s bewildering to me is that Austin is as “white” as any schwartza can be.

    A child of the Civil Rights Era, raised Catholic in White Christian-oriented schools, with a very, very WASPY name of “Lloyd James Austin III.”

    Raised through the ranks of a desegregated military to General, with a little help of White-enabled Affirmative Action, and in Biden’s segregated regime awarded for being the right color to Secretary of Defense, and he’s whimpering about “white racism?”

    He’s got to be the biggest Black “White Supremacist” of them all if he’s willing to tell the truth.

    He can’t do that.

    He’s shilling for the Jews so that he’s awarded good press, perks and retirement from Jewish Wall Street that finances the armaments industries, and good standing with Jewry’s father, the devil, who roasts black meat shilling schwarzas in hell.

    Every single thing that Blacks and their slave masters the Jews enjoy today was invented and developed by White Christians:

    The telephone, the light bulb, the automobile, the airplane, irrigation and farm machinery, (not peanuts and a cotton gin), all developed by the “whites” they scourge as “racists” in order to defame US history.

    Erase American History and all that’s left are HoloHoax Museums honoring rotting Jewish carcasses most of which are burning in hell.

    And why do you think this apostate Catholic schwartsa Austin celebrates Pride Day as Defense Chief?

    And applauds fags, queers, trannys and transvestite freaks?

    And endorses anti-White, lesbian-oriented, military recruitment ads?

    Because he and Milley know that wars today are no longer fought with troops, I mean, just look at how fat these two generals are.

    Wars today are fought with drones, jets, bombs, proxy terrorists like US supported ISIS, bio-weapons, cyber jamming, and economic and financial sanctions.

    Austin and Milley–I mean the Jew-owned Fed and Jewish Wall Street that cuts their pay checks with perks galore–need homos, lesbians, trannies that spit on the Bible’s teachings, and anti-White minorities to turn on “domestic extremists” when the War on White Christians reaches its apogee.

    Didn’t you hear these two Jews at DOJ and DHS–Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas–tell you what the greatest threat to America is?

    Not BLM, not Black rioters, not Black looters that run amuck, nor the “New Black Panthers” which are now on the run after shooting a White cop in the head in Daytona Beach.

    The Jews need them all to disrupt and tear down America so that only one minority, them, rises to the top.

    And is it because Garland and Mayorkas really care about schwartzas so much that they keep protecting them from criticism?

    Give me a big break.

    I grew up as a Jew, and it’s considered a disgrace for a Jew to live in a mixed Black-White neighborhood like in Pittsburgh’s Penn Hills area.

    In racist Israel, you must know, the black Ethiopian women–”Falasha Jews”–were given sterilization shots touting them as flu shots.

    Black Babies Lives DON’T Matter to Jews.

    Israel gets a free pass while Jews are hellbent on fragmenting, diluting, tearing down, dividing, debouching America, and annihilating Christian mores bolstered by Whites AND Blacks upon which our nation was built.

    Yet it’s White Supremacists–where not one identifiable militia or action can be cited–that’s the “greatest threat.” [Clip]

    “Thank you very much for inviting me to join you today.

    “For more than a century the Anti-Defamation League has been at the forefront of fighting Anti-Semitism and securing justice and fair treatment to all.

    “Just last month the FBI Director testified that racially or ethnically motivided–motivated domestic violence extremists, specifically those who advocate for White Supremacy, are the top domestic terror threats that we face.”

    Leahy: “But you do agree with your predecessors that white supremacist extremists remain the most persistent lethal threat in the homeland?”

    Mayorkas “I, I do believe they, they do at this time, Mr. Chairman.”

    Leahy: “And Attorney General Garland, do you agree?”

    Garland: “I do, and that’s the most recent assessment of the FBI.”

    “White Supremacy” is a Jewish buzzword for “Trump supporters” whose only wish is to maintain Christian mores in America and the centrality of the family from which civic responsibility and ethical cohesion springs.

    White Christians!

    You’re being sidelined, marginalized, and now criminalized in today’s America.

    And it’s the Jews and their shills who are doing this to you.

    Milley and the Schwarta aren’t prepping for foreign wars.

    They’re prepping for a Jewish War on White Christian Americans coming to a town and neighborhood near you.

  2. Brother Nathanael June 29, 2021 @ 9:55 pm

    This video can be watched @

  3. Brother Nathanael June 29, 2021 @ 9:57 pm

    Help Me Fight!

    Online Secure Donations @

    Bitcoin @

    Cash App @$BrotherNathanael

    Brother Nathanael Foundation
    Box 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    All cash donations by mail come in safely.


    Janet J

    Michael C

    Keep Up The Good Work


    Raymond B (PRAYING for your father…)

  4. Ft. Nolan June 29, 2021 @ 11:00 pm

    General “Mark-cyst” Milley… has he ever read the Bible?

    The greatest threat to our Republic is the synagogue of Satan and its affiliates.

  5. The Englishman June 30, 2021 @ 1:19 am

    Can you not see the whole raft of ignoramuses, POTUS, Generals et al, SQUIRM on viewing America’s Greatest American.

    +BN’s extraordinary work is an indictment of World Jewry’s subversion of all Christendom.

    It can take seven hundred years to become a saint – I don’t know about that, though I do say, Saint Bartholomew should someday expect company.

  6. Rachel June 30, 2021 @ 5:49 am

    It’s all colors of Christians that the jews have waged war on.

    Ask the Palestinians, et al.

  7. Earl H June 30, 2021 @ 10:26 am

    This prancing, fumbling dingbat is why USMC Gen. Holland M. Smith despised the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    We are now truly in deep, deep, trouble.

    The fact that he is approved of by the depraved and perverse who now hold all the power is Exhibit “A”.

    Don’t know what we’d do without you, BroNat.

  8. hans June 30, 2021 @ 11:37 am

    There is a lot of shooting in USA as I read.

    Probably most by blacks. I’m wondering the most white patriotic weapons owners are sleeping into the coming storm.

    They shut awake can target Rothschilds, Soros , Rockefellers, Gates, Fauci and the rest of jewish freemason-zionist mafia. The initiators of NWO-WEF slavery. But first shoot their bodyguards + surveillance cameras!

  9. Amber June 30, 2021 @ 12:54 pm

    Militias work for the nation. The US Military work for the Military-Industrial-Central Banker-Complex.

    George Washington in his farewell address advised against allowing standing armies in the nation. Why was this allowed?

    Americans have failed miserably in applying their own Founding documents and history. The failure has allowed the Federal Reserve, the US Military and Zionists to gut and destroy their country.

    It is advisable to start over with the remaining unvaxxed!

    Brother Nathanael has a practical plan to make it happen, and a spiritually based one that compliments it here:

  10. Eric June 30, 2021 @ 1:20 pm

    It’s nice to see Jews being understood from a Christian perspective (the only way you can understand them).

    I am tired of anti-Christian White Nationalists who think they can fight Jewish influence effectively but will never get out of their own little echo chambers.

    No matter how much you point out to them that Jesus established a New Covenant, removing God’s favor from the Jews, and no matter how much you point out to them that Jesus — as God in human flesh — existed before time and before there were any Jews (so that he can’t be reduced materialistically to “being a Jew”), they refuse to listen.

    I think a lot of them are Jewish-controlled opposition. Jews don’t fear anti-Christian Whites, they fear Christianity.

    It was a strong, traditional Christianity that kept the Muslims from taking over Europe (which they tried to do with the help of the Jews for 1,000 years).

    It was a strong traditional Christianity that kept the Jews from taking over Russia and establishing communism.

    It was only when Christianity declined during the 20th century that Jews were able to take over our nations. It is only because Christianity is weak that Muslims are taking over Europe right now.

    They don’t even have to fight their way in; they’re invited.

    David Duke, George Lincoln Rockwell, and Harold Covington knew that this anti-Christian approach would get people nowhere.

    That’s why my go-to places are Brother Nathanael, E. Michael Jones, Rick Wiles of TruNews, and Pastor Chuck Baldwin. I’m done with the Occidental Observer, Renegade Tribune, and other sites that are either anti-Christian or tolerate hate speech against Christians.

  11. JIM June 30, 2021 @ 1:24 pm

    Its a shame that these 3 Stooges, Biden, Milley, and Austin are being used and abused by the Jews in destroying our Country.

    Some People will do anything for a paycheck.

    Get ready for the Revolution.

  12. Pierre June 30, 2021 @ 3:27 pm

    I’d just like to announce today that I identify as an ahhumm, and I appreciate your respect if not awe and admiration at my, umm, courage in, ahh, doing so.

    I, umm, first noticed that I was an, ahh, umm person…oh forget about that, it is not important where I, umm, came from, but where I, ahh, umm going to that matters, wherever that, ahh, is.

    And to all those hurtful people that seek to deny me my rights, all I can say is, umm, ahh, humbug.


    Senior Military Commander and Literati Representative of the lesbian and lame soldiers.

    Don’t kill, convert.

  13. KevinM. June 30, 2021 @ 4:37 pm

    Wow, “war on white Christians” is so true!

    Have you commented yet on whether or how the Jews and Communists are the same people?

  14. Rachel June 30, 2021 @ 7:07 pm

    There are more of us than them.

    That’s why they’re shitting their pants hence the 24/7 propaganda bullshit.

    They’ve got nothing but the electric jew aka TV.

    Brother Nate, do you have siblings, and if so, would you be so kind to expand of your background and how it affects you today?

  15. mrbuttermaker00 June 30, 2021 @ 9:20 pm

    I don’t know, if i had the ability to make great videos, I can do an entire spot on Exposing the real Ron DeSantis.

    For those that follow +BN, I’m sure you all never bought the Kool-Aid . He needs to be EXPOSED. Just sayin’. To prove a point that is necessary:

    Careful. You will gag at the Header pic in article

    Florida Governor Visits Chabad Shul to Sign Two New Bills

  16. mrbuttermaker00 June 30, 2021 @ 9:22 pm

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Allowing Forced Vaccinations & Quarantines

    If I ever had the time to have a Blogspot like Mami, THIS would be at the top. Permanently! That way if you saw what is listed above, you would never have to ask WHY? or be hoodwinked by a traitor like Ron DeSantis

    Cynthia McKinney – US lawmakers forced to support Israel – Press TV 22-May-2011

  17. mrbuttermaker00 June 30, 2021 @ 9:23 pm

    ” The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that in the Russian revolution * , the triumph of communism was the triumph of Judaism. ” – RabbiWaton, ‘A Program For The Jews And Humanity’, NY 1939. ( * a coup d’etat that accounted for the GENOCIDE of over60millionGentiles, another 100+ million in China after Rittenberg Coe Epstein Adler brought in their communism).

    “Some call it Marxism. I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Weise, The American Bulletin ‘, May 5, 1935.

    “The bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning who’s goal is to create a NEW ORDER in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, shall become reality all over the world.” – ‘The AmericanHebrew’, September 10, 1920.


  18. KathJuliane June 30, 2021 @ 10:58 pm

    The Jew-owned PTB have to replace a failed 40-yr long War on Global Foreign CIA-controlled Jihadist Terror with a new Transnational War on FBI/Interpol-created Domestic Terror (aka War on Domestic Extremist White Supremacists) making its premiere after long years in the planning in the interlocking Jewish-Silicon Valley Commissariat and Establishment Neoliberalcon Think Tanks inside the Beltway, devoting huge amounts of resources and cash to it all.

    But, ow wonderful it is to see that Attorney General Merrick Garland, openly revealing himself as official federal spokesman for the ADL, and “Second Gentleman” Douglas Emhoff, White House legate to Hollywood & Silicon Valley, have both now officially confirmed that the Department of Justice is officially the hasbarat and enforcement arm of the Anti-Defamation League, Weimerica’s Ministry of Truth.

    Kamala’s husband: “We Have to Follow the ADL’s Lead!”

    My response: Heaven forbid I should say something unladylike to the star-people pinheads with tiny hats and their consorts and cohorts such as “Piss off and go soak your head in a dirty toilet.”


    Who Is a “Terrorist” In Biden’s America?

    Russian Faith

    30 June, 2021

    Far from being a war against “white supremacy,” the Biden administration’s new “domestic terror” strategy clearly targets primarily those who oppose US government overreach and those who oppose capitalism and/or globalization.

    Whitney Webb

    Originally appeared at: The Last American Vagabond

    In the latest sign that the US government’s War on Domestic Terror is growing in scope and scale, the White House on Tuesday revealed the nation’s first ever government-wide strategy for confronting domestic terrorism.

    While cloaked in language about stemming racially motivated violence, the strategy places those deemed “anti-government” or “anti-authority” on a par with racist extremists and charts out policies that could easily be abused to silence or even criminalize online criticism of the government.

    Even more disturbing is the call to essentially fuse intelligence agencies, law enforcement, Silicon Valley, and “community” and “faith-based” organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, as well as unspecified foreign governments, as partners in this “war,” which the strategy makes clear will rely heavily on a pre-crime orientation focused largely on what is said on social media and encrypted platforms.

    Though the strategy claims that the government will “shield free speech and civil liberties” in implementing this policy, its contents reveal that it is poised to gut both.

    Indeed, while framed publicly as chiefly targeting “right-wing white supremacists,” the strategy itself makes it clear that the government does not plan to focus on the Right but instead will pursue “domestic terrorists” in “an ideologically neutral, threat-driven manner,” as the law “makes no distinction based on political view—left, right or center.”

    It also states that a key goal of this strategic framework is to ensure “that there is simply no governmental tolerance . . . of violence as an acceptable mode of seeking political or social change,” regardless of a perpetrator’s political affiliation.

    Considering that the main cheerleaders for the War on Domestic Terror exist mainly in establishment left circles, such individuals should rethink their support for this new policy given that the above statements could easily come to encompass Black Lives Matter–related protests, such as those that transpired last summer, depending on which political party is in power.

    Once the new infrastructure is in place, it will remain there and will be open to the same abuses perpetrated by both political parties in the US during the lengthy War on Terror following September 11, 2001. The history of this new “domestic terror” policy, including its origins in the Trump administration, makes this clear.

    It’s Never Been Easier to Be a “Terrorist”

    In introducing the strategy, the Biden administration cites “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists” as a key reason for the new policy and a main justification for the War on Domestic Terror in general.

    This was most recently demonstrated Tuesday in Attorney General Merrick Garland’s statement announcing this new strategy.

    However, the document itself puts “anti-government” or “anti-authority” “extremists” in the same category as violent white supremacists in terms of being a threat to the homeland. The strategy’s characterization of such individuals is unsettling.

    AG Merrick Garland: “In the FBI’s view, the top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethically motivated violent extremists specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race.”

    — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) June 15, 2021

    For instance, those who “violently oppose” “all forms of capitalism” or “corporate globalization” are listed under this less-discussed category of “domestic terrorist.”

    This highlights how people on the left, many of whom have called for capitalism to be dismantled or replaced in the US in recent years, could easily be targeted in this new “war” that many self-proclaimed leftists are currently supporting.

    Similarly, “environmentally-motivated extremists,” a category in which groups such as Extinction Rebellion could easily fall, are also included.

    In addition, the phrasing indicates that it could easily include as “terrorists” those who oppose the World Economic Forum’s vision for global “stakeholder capitalism,” as that form of “capitalism” involves corporations and their main “stakeholders” creating a new global economic and governance system. The WEF’s stakeholder capitalism thus involves both “capitalism” and “corporate globalization.”

    The strategy also includes those who “take steps to violently resist government authority . . . based on perceived overreach.”

    This, of course, creates a dangerous situation in which the government could, purposely or otherwise, implement a policy that is an obvious overreach and/or blatantly unconstitutional and then label those who resist it “domestic terrorists” and deal with them as such—well before the overreach can be challenged in court.

    Another telling addition to this group of potential “terrorists” is “any other individual or group who engages in violence—or incites imminent violence—in opposition to legislative, regulatory or other actions taken by the government.”

    Thus, if the government implements a policy that a large swath of the population finds abhorrent, such as launching a new, unpopular war abroad, those deemed to be “inciting” resistance to the action online could be considered domestic terrorists.

    Such scenarios are not unrealistic, given the loose way in which the government and the media have defined things like “incitement” and even “violence” (e. g., “hate speech” is a form of violence) in the recent past.

    The situation is ripe for manipulation and abuse. To think the federal government (including the Biden administration and subsequent administrations) would not abuse such power reflects an ignorance of US political history, particularly when the main forces behind most terrorist incidents in the nation are actually US government institutions like the FBI (more FBI examples here, here, here, and here).

    Furthermore, the original plans for the detention of American dissidents in the event of a national emergency, drawn up during the Reagan era as part of its “continuity of government” contingency, cited popular nonviolent opposition to US intervention in Latin America as a potential “emergency” that could trigger the activation of those plans.

    Many of those “continuity of government” protocols remain on the books today and can be triggered, depending on the whims of those in power. It is unlikely that this new domestic terror framework will be any different regarding nonviolent protest and demonstrations.

    Yet another passage in this section of the strategy states that “domestic terrorists” can, “in some instances, connect and intersect with conspiracy theories and other forms of disinformation and misinformation.”

    It adds that the proliferation of such “dangerous” information “on Internet-based communications platforms such as social media, file-upload sites and end-to-end encrypted platforms, all of these elements can combine and amplify threats to public safety.”

    Thus, the presence of “conspiracy theories” and information deemed by the government to be “misinformation” online is itself framed as threatening public safety, a claim made more than once in this policy document.

    Given that a major “pillar” of the strategy involves eliminating online material that promotes “domestic terrorist” ideologies, it seems inevitable that such efforts will also “connect and intersect” with the censorship of “conspiracy theories” and narratives that the establishment finds inconvenient or threatening for any reason.

    Pillars of Tyranny

    The strategy notes in several places that this new domestic-terror policy will involve a variety of public-private partnerships in order to “build a community to address domestic terrorism that extends not only across the Federal Government but also to critical partners.”

    It adds, “That includes state, local, tribal and territorial governments, as well as foreign allies and partners, civil society, the technology sector, academic, and more.”

    The mention of foreign allies and partners is important as it suggests a multinational approach to what is supposedly a US “domestic” issue and is yet another step toward a transnational security-state apparatus.

    A similar multinational approach was used to devastating effect during the CIA-developed Operation Condor, which was used to target and “disappear” domestic dissidents in South America in the 1970s and 1980s.

    The foreign allies mentioned in the Biden administration’s strategy are left unspecified, but it seems likely that such allies would include the rest of the Five Eyes alliance (the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand) and Israel, all of which already have well-established information-sharing agreements with the US for signals intelligence.

    The new domestic-terror strategy has four main “pillars,” which can be summarized as (1) understanding and sharing domestic terrorism-related information, including with foreign governments and private tech companies; (2) preventing domestic terrorism recruitment and mobilization to violence; (3) disrupting and deterring domestic terrorism activity; and (4) confronting long-term contributors to domestic terrorism.

    The first pillar involves the mass accumulation of data through new information-sharing partnerships and the deepening of existing ones. Much of this information sharing will involve increased data mining and analysis of statements made openly on the internet, particularly on social media, something already done by US intelligence contractors such as Palantir.

    While the gathering of such information has been ongoing for years, this policy allows even more to be shared and legally used to make cases against individuals deemed to have made threats or expressed “dangerous” opinions online.

    Included in the first pillar is the need to increase engagement with financial institutions concerning the financing of “domestic terrorists.”

    US banks, such as Bank of America, have already gone quite far in this regard, leading to accusations that it has begun acting like an intelligence agency.

    Such claims were made after it was revealed that the BofA had passed to the government the private banking information of over two hundred people that the bank deemed as pointing to involvement in the events of January 6, 2021.

    It seems likely, given this passage in the strategy, that such behavior by banks will soon become the norm, rather than an outlier, in the United States.

    The second pillar is ostensibly focused on preventing the online recruitment of domestic terrorists and online content that leads to the “mobilization of violence.”

    The strategy notes that this pillar “means reducing both supply and demand of recruitment materials by limiting widespread availability online and bolstering resilience to it by those who nonetheless encounter it.“

    The strategy states that such government efforts in the past have a “mixed record,” but it goes on to claim that trampling on civil liberties will be avoided because the government is “consulting extensively” with unspecified “stakeholders” nationwide.

    Regarding recruitment, the strategy states that “these activities are increasingly happening on Internet-based communications platforms, including social media, online gaming platforms, file-upload sites and end-to-end encrypted platforms, even as those products and services frequently offer other important benefits.”

    It adds that “the widespread availability of domestic terrorist recruitment material online is a national security threat whose front lines are overwhelmingly private-sector online platforms.”

    The US government plans to provide “information to assist online platforms with their own initiatives to enforce their own terms of service that prohibits the use of their platforms for domestic terrorist activities” as well as to “facilitate more robust efforts outside the government to counter terrorists’ abuse of Internet-based communications platforms.”

    Given the wider definition of “domestic terrorist” that now includes those who oppose capitalism and corporate globalization as well as those who resist government overreach, online content discussing these and other “anti-government” and “anti-authority” ideas could soon be treated in the same way as online Al Qaeda or ISIS propaganda.

    Efforts, however, are unlikely to remain focused on these topics. As Unlimited Hangout reported last November, both UK intelligence and the US national-security state were developing plans to treat critical reporting on the COVID-19 vaccines as “extremist” propaganda.

    Another key part of this pillar is the need to “increase digital literacy” among the American public, while censoring “harmful content” disseminated by “terrorists” as well as by “hostile foreign powers seeking to undermine American democracy.”

    The latter is a clear reference to the claim that critical reporting of US government policy, particularly its military and intelligence activities abroad, was the product of “Russian disinformation,” a now discredited claim that was used to heavily censor independent media. This new government strategy appears to promise more of this sort of thing.

    It also notes that “digital literacy” education for a domestic audience is being developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Such a policy would have previously violated US law until the Obama administration worked with Congress to repeal the Smith-Mundt Act, thus lifting the ban on the government directing propaganda at domestic audiences.

    The third pillar of the strategy seeks to increase the number of federal prosecutors investigating and trying domestic-terror cases. Their numbers are likely to jump as the definition of “domestic terrorist” is expanded.

    It also seeks to explore whether “legislative reforms could meaningfully and materially increase our ability to protect Americans from acts of domestic terrorism while simultaneously guarding against potential abuse of overreach.”

    In contrast to past public statements on police reform by those in the Biden administration, the strategy calls to “empower” state and local law enforcement to tackle domestic terrorism, including with increased access to “intelligence” on citizens deemed dangerous or subversive for any number of reasons.

    To that effect, the strategy states the following (p. 24):

    “The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Department of Homeland Security, with support from the National Counterterrorism Center [part of the intelligence community], are incorporating an increased focus on domestic terrorism into current intelligence products and leveraging current mechanisms of information and intelligence sharing to improve the sharing of domestic terrorism-related content and indicators with non-Federal partners.

    “These agencies are also improving the usability of their existing information-sharing platforms, including through the development of mobile applications designed to provide a broader reach to non-Federal law enforcement partners, while simultaneously refining that support based on partner feedback.”

    Such an intelligence tool could easily be, for example, Palantir, which is already used by the intelligence agencies, the DHS, and several US police departments for “predictive policing,” that is, pre-crime actions. Notably, Palantir has long included a “subversive” label for individuals included on government and law enforcement databases, a parallel with the controversial and highly secretive Main Core database of US dissidents.

    DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas made the “pre-crime” element of the new domestic terror strategy explicit on Tuesday when he said in a statement that DHS would continue “developing key partnerships with local stakeholders through the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3) to identify potential threats and prevent terrorism.”

    CP3, which replaced DHS’ Office for Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention this past May, officially “supports communities across the United States to prevent individuals from radicalizing to violence and intervene when individuals have already radicalized to violence.”

    The fourth pillar of the strategy is by far the most opaque and cryptic, while also the most far-reaching. It aims to address the sources that cause “terrorists” to mobilize “towards violence.”

    This requires “tackling racism in America,” a lofty goal for an administration headed by the man who controversially eulogized Congress’ most ardent segregationist and who was a key architect of the 1994 crime bill. As well, it provides for “early intervention and appropriate care for those who pose a danger to themselves or others.”

    In regard to the latter proposal, the Trump administration, in a bid to “stop mass shootings before they occur,” considered a proposal to create a “health DARPA” or “HARPA” that would monitor the online communications of everyday Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs that someone might be “mobilizing towards violence.”

    While the Trump administration did not create HARPA or adopt this policy, the Biden administration has recently announced plans to do so.

    Finally, the strategy indicates that this fourth pillar is part of a “broader priority”: “enhancing faith in government and addressing the extreme polarization, fueled by a crisis of disinformation and misinformation often channeled through social media platforms, which can tear Americans apart and lead some to violence.”

    In other words, fostering trust in government while simultaneously censoring “polarizing” voices who distrust or criticize the government is a key policy goal behind the Biden administration’s new domestic-terror strategy.

    Calling Their Shots?

    While this is a new strategy, its origins lie in the Trump administration. In October 2019, Trump’s attorney general William Barr formally announced in a memorandum that a new “national disruption and early engagement program” aimed at detecting those “mobilizing towards violence” before they commit any crime would launch in the coming months.

    That program, known as DEEP (Disruption and Early Engagement Program), is now active and has involved the Department of Justice, the FBI, and “private sector partners” since its creation.

    Barr’s announcement of DEEP followed his unsettling “prediction” in July 2019 that “a major incident may occur at any time that will galvanize public opinion on these issues.”

    Not long after that speech, a spate of mass shootings occurred, including the El Paso Walmart shooting, which killed twenty-three and about which many questions remain unanswered regarding the FBI’s apparent foreknowledge of the event.

    After these events took place in 2019, Trump called for the creation of a government backdoor into encryption and the very pre-crime system that Barr announced shortly thereafter in October 2019. The Biden administration, in publishing this strategy, is merely finishing what Barr started.

    Indeed, a “prediction” like Barr’s in 2019 was offered by the DHS’ Elizabeth Neumann during a Congressional hearing in late February 2020.

    That hearing was largely ignored by the media as it coincided with an international rise of concern regarding COVID-19.

    At the hearing, Neumann, who previously coordinated the development of the government’s post-9/11 terrorism information sharing strategies and policies and worked closely with the intelligence community, gave the following warning about an imminent “domestic terror” event in the United States:

    “And every counterterrorism professional I speak to in the federal government and overseas feels like we are at the doorstep of another 9/11, maybe not something that catastrophic in terms of the visual or the numbers, but that we can see it building and we don’t quite know how to stop it.”

    This “another 9/11” emerged on January 6, 2021, as the events of that day in the Capitol were quickly labeled as such by both the media and prominent politicians, while also inspiring calls from the White House and the Democrats for a “9/11-style commission” to investigate the incident.

    This event, of course, figures prominently in the justification for the new domestic-terror strategy, despite the considerable video and other evidence that shows that Capitol law enforcement, and potentially the FBI, were directly involved in facilitating the breach of the Capitol.

    In addition, when one considers that the QAnon movement, which had a clear role in the events of January 6, was itself likely a government-orchestrated psyop, the government hand in creating this situation seems clear.

    It goes without saying that the official reasons offered for these militaristic “domestic terror” policies, which the US has already implemented abroad—causing much more terror than it has prevented—does not justify the creation of a massive new national-security infrastructure that aims to criminalize and censor online speech.

    Yet the admission that this new strategy, as part of a broader effort to “enhance faith in government,” combines domestic propaganda campaigns with the censorship and pursuit of those who distrust government heralds the end of even the illusion of democracy in the United States.

  19. Chris July 1, 2021 @ 1:16 am

    Another great video, Brother Nathanael!

  20. KathJuliane July 1, 2021 @ 11:53 am

    Is Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin Really This Clueless?

    Gateway Pundit

    By Larry Johnson
    Published June 23, 2021

    Lloyd Austin always had the reputation while on active duty of being the affirmative action hire as he moved up the ranks.

    In other words, he got his job because of the color of his skin and not because of his performance.

    You want proof? Just watch his exchange today with Congressman Matt Gaetz regarding Bishop Garrison (start at 3:20):


    Bishop Garrison’s record as a racist is quite clear. Consider this excerpt from a piece published in August 2019:

    “We will continue to face the nation-ending threat of white supremacy and white nationalist extremism unless we invest in Combating Violent Extremism (CVE) programs, which this administration has cut, and find the courage to have honest-to-God difficult, uncomfortable conversations in our homes and communities about our history of race and privilege in America and how it has shaped our lives today.

    “An example of this in practice is the New York Times Magazine’s 1619 Project, a series of opinion pieces, poetry, essays, and historical works designed to inform readers on the treatment and history of slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws in America.

    “The project’s title comes from the August anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves, 20-30 individuals from what is now modern-day Angola, in the British American colonies. Each work highlights not only past atrocities and injustices experienced by black Americans, but ongoing systemic issues that have plagued the nation from its original sin of slavery into the present day.

    “It’s an important effort that may very well shape the dialogue around race, inclusion, and the need for steadfast policies that may one day fill the discriminatory gaps in our society and help heal the country. And the effort is, somehow, in 2019, controversial.

    “While pundits clutch pearls and attempt to convince us that the 1619 Project is a lie, that it’s really white society under attack, and that we’re in a post-racial society because we once had a black man as president, more radicalized white supremacists will shoot up schools, markets, stores, and places of worship to assert their ideology.

    “We are not required to blindly believe pundits. We must not be bullied by maniacs who seek power through semi-automatic rifles. We must not run from engagement with each other; the change we desire can be achieved through heartfelt, frequently difficult, and awkward conversations among family, friends, and neighbors about race and its continued impact on our lives. Reading the 1619 Project is a good place to start.”

    There you have it. Garrison embraces as true the claim that White extremism is running rampant and that the 1619 Project, a black version of Mein Kampf, is somehow essential reading.

    It is astonishing that Lloyd Austin would admit he had no idea that Bishop Garrison is associated with Critical Race Theory. Reminds me of Butterfly McQueen’s iconic scene from Gone With the Wind.

    Lloyd Austin is not a stupid man. He is educated and articulate. More articulate in fact than that dunderhead Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Milley (see Jim Hoft’s skewering of the clueless General here for his lame attempt to suck up to Austin). But Austin is either lying or is intellectually incurious. Who would give Garrison the position of Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense for Diversity and Inclusion without checking out his writings and public comments?

    Garrison is the anti-Martin Luther King. He does not give a damn about one’s character. For him it is all about the color of a person’s skin. That is the essence of racism.

    Worse, Garrison embraces a definition of “extremism” that mimics what Britain’s King George said about the patriots of 1776:

    “A leaked 17-page DARPA memo from March 27, 2021 entitled “Extremism and Insider Threat in the DoD” provides a clue as to what new categories of lawful thoughts, associations and reading materials are likely to be scanned and banned by Bishop Garrison’s CEWG. DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency colloquially known as “The Pentagon’s Brain,” recommended a brand new category called “Patriot Extremism,” which occurs when a citizen believes “the US government has become corrupt” or “has overstepped its constitutional boundaries”.”

    The truth of the current reality in Washington, DC is that corruption is rampant. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin embodies this corruption. He retired from the Army in 2016 snagged sweetheart positions on the boards of Raytheon Technologies, Nucor, and Tenet Healthcare.

    Here we have a black man raking in millions because of his military service yet we are asked to believe that blacks are so victimized by white supremacists that they can’t get a break. Give me a break. This is patent nonsense.

    It is time for true American patriots to rally around the vision of Dr. Martin Luther King:

    Martin Luther King speech – I Have a Dream


    Bishop Garrison, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense for Diversity and Inclusion, is the Pentagon’s hatchet man in charge of purging anti-woke, patriotic Christian social and political conservatives of any color and ethnicity, and installing Critical Race Theory in the military.

    TRENDING: “CNN’s About Controlling Negroes, That’s What It Stands [For], Controlling Negroes” – Vernon Jones DESTROYS CNN Reporter

    Something like 68%-75% of the “white supremacist” shooters are seriously mentally ill or emotionally unstable, and are/or went off psychotropic meds. My favorite 2nd Amendment site, Gun Facts, “We are neither pro-gun or anti-gun, we are pro-math and anti-b.s.”, concisely breaks it down here ‘Mental Breakdown of Mass Shooters’: -Kj

  21. KathJuliane July 1, 2021 @ 12:56 pm

    Meet Bishop Garrison: The Pentagon’s Hatchet Man in Charge of Purging MAGA Patriots and Installing Race Theory in The Military

    [Aka General Austin’s Brain – Kj]


    May 5, 2021

    On February 3, 2021, in the wake of the “deadly events” of 1/6, Biden’s new Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered a 60-day stand-down and total purge of the U.S. military’s rampant, undefined “extremism” problem.

    Though the details of this purge were always kept vague and framed in apolitical terms, it was immediately obvious the target would be MAGA — with the buzzword “extremism” tagged onto various proxies for Trump supporters, conservatives, and opponents of globalism of all stripes.

    We now know the hatchet man the Pentagon has selected to carry out this MAGA purge of the American defense forces, and the entire operation is worse than you could have ever imagined.

    The Biden administration has just put the equivalent of Ibram X. Kendi in charge of vetting the entire U.S. military.

    This hatchet man’s name is Bishop Garrison, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense for Diversity and Inclusion:

    Bishop Garrison says that being a Trump supporter makes you a racist, misogynist, extremist.

    This isn’t just some random case of Trump Derangement Syndrome on Twitter.

    As the new head of the U.S. military’s “Countering Extremism” task force, this critical race theory loving, Trump Derangement Syndrome suffering, fake news spreading, 100% partisan hack is the man who will now separate permissible “opinion” from purgeable “extremism” at the Pentagon, which is the nation’s largest employer, overseeing 2.9 million personnel.

    Just as the Defense Secretary’s 60 day stand down to take stock of “extremism” within the military’s ranks expired, the Pentagon issued a formal memo on April 9th describing its “Immediate Actions to Counter Extremism.” This memo establishes the Countering Extremism Working Group (“CEWG”) to develop and implement all “Counter Extremism” policies at the Pentagon.

    Bishop Garrison is at the helm.

    From the memo:

    “The [CEWG’s] immediate actions are as follows:

    Review and Update of DODI 1325.06 Extremism Definition: Office of the Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) and the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) will review and update DODI 1325.06 to more specifically define what constitutes extremist behavior.”

    Led by Bishop Garrison, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense on Human Capital and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, the CEWG will oversee the implementation of immediate actions as well as the development of mid-term and long-term recommendations for the continued engagement of this issue.

    The CEWG will report through the Workforce Management Group (WMG) to the Deputy’s Workforce Council (DWC). [U.S. Department of Defense]”

    From the above, we learn that Bishop Garrison will lead the CEWG, which will function as a de facto “Opinion Police” for Pentagon personnel on a permanent, go-forward basis.

    The CEWG’s first tasks will be: to change the Pentagon’s definition of “extremism”; to stop Pentagon personnel from being recruited by “extremist” groups; and to beef up personnel screening to better detect hidden “extremist beliefs.”

    If you’re in the military, it appears that Bishop Garrison’s CEWG will scour your Internet history, making sure to target “gray areas, such as reading, following and liking extremist material and content in social media forums and platforms.”

    But what exactly are “extremist beliefs” and “extremist materials”?

    A leaked 17-page DARPA memo from March 27, 2021 entitled “Extremism and Insider Threat in the DoD” provides a clue as to what new categories of lawful thoughts, associations and reading materials are likely to be scanned and banned by Bishop Garrison’s CEWG.

    DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency colloquially known as “The Pentagon’s Brain,” recommended a brand new category called “Patriot Extremism,” which occurs when a citizen believes “the US government has become corrupt” or “has overstepped its constitutional boundaries”:

    “Patriot Extremism” is completely distinct from “White supremacy,” which DARPA maintains as a wholly separate category. To DARPA’s credit, they did at least add a new category for “Anarchist Extremism,” which purports to target some degree of left-wing political organization.

    But DARPA’s “Symbols of Extremism” collage on page 6 clearly reveals their intended target: the collage includes 12 “far-right” symbols, versus just two Antifa symbols, and just one for ISIS. “Extremist” “far-right” symbols include Pepe the Frog, the OK hand gesture, “Come and Take It” guns-rights memes, and the “Q” in QAnon:
    [Same Politico link above].

    So now it’s up to Bishop Garrison’s CEWG to take DARPA’s “extremism” proposals and either implement them, throw them in the trash, or come up with something new.

    We already have a good idea of Bishop Garrison’s views from the egregious anti-Trump tweets presented above.

    But since Bishop Garrison will effectively be the vetter-in-chief responsible for culling the entire U.S. military of any potential “extremist” in its ranks, it’s only fair that Bishop Garrison’s own “extremist” Internet footprint be more thoroughly exposed — and with it the entire sham of his dangerous project to politicize and purge America’s defense forces.

    The Critical Race Theory Zealot

    Bishop Garrison is an ardent advocate of the so-called “1619 Project.” In August 2019, he instructed his followers to stop whatever they were doing and read 1619‘s 100-page spread in the Sunday Times immediately.


  22. benzion kook July 1, 2021 @ 2:52 pm

    It’s all jew commie rot using the usual cretinous dupes to advance their illegal insurrectionist coup d’etat.

    100 million murdered in the USSR. When do they plan to open the FEMA gulag death camps?

    These lying scum know no bounds. Keep your weapons clean, and never allow them to mutate your children.

  23. Pierre July 1, 2021 @ 3:31 pm

    Some good insights here into how Jewish Freemasonry is.

    Recommended viewing only for those aware of how Jewish Freemasonry is. (Ah, but I repeat myself)

  24. The Ghost of Freedom July 1, 2021 @ 7:17 pm

    The intense onslaught of a PSY OP the equivalent of “Shock & Awe” was coordinated with the Chicoms who introduced their gift that keeps on giving…”Covid 19″.

    Trump was finally taken down and the boot is NEVER going to stop stomping on the faces of all who oppose the parasitic Zionist globalist feudalist takeover of the world (AKA – Synagogue of Satan).

    The CHICOMS have other plans then just kissing ass with these vipers.

    The 200 million man army prophesied in revelation will indeed march against Jerusalem during the battle of Armageddon.

    And we are now sprinting to the finish line.

    Love your family, and appreciate the time you have left before all hell finally breaks loose upon this world.

  25. KathJuliane July 1, 2021 @ 8:11 pm

    Biden’s new “domestic terrorism” strategy reads more like a political targeting document, than it does a national security one.


    Biden Domestic Terror Strategy Codifies Woke War on Wrongthink | Opinion


    Ben Weingarten, Fellow, Claremont Institute

    ON 6/30/21

    The Biden administration’s first-of-its-kind National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism codifies a federal War on Wrongthink. In sum, the document makes clear that the imposition of Wokeism constitutes a national security imperative.

    That is, the strategy uses public safety to justify leftist domination of both public policy and the public discourse, enforcing the regime’s ideology at the point of a government gun.

    It comes against the backdrop of the Woking of the defense, national security and intelligence apparatuses, the executive branch more broadly and society itself, whereby those who run afoul of progressivism are deemed bigoted and dangerous—and therefore liable to be purged.

    And it comes amidst an all-consuming effort to pursue anyone even remotely close to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, a catalyzing event for the strategy.

    That effort appears to serve as the strategy’s archetype, particularly given the cohort targeted, the lengths to which the feds will pursue it and the ways in which they are straining to make their case to justify the rhetoric of insurrection.

    Defendants are languishing in jail for weeks while seemingly being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, and those who get their day in court are recanting their political views forced confession-style—while innocent bystanders face ruin.

    This operation ought to demonstrate the hyper-political nature of the Biden administration’s crafting and executing of this strategy, and therefore its immense danger.

    The broader context cannot be ignored. But even within its own four corners, the strategy is full of disturbing passages, culminating in a positively chilling crescendo.

    To begin, the strategy fails to clearly define who exactly it is targeting—meaning the target could be ever-moving, and forever growing—but strongly implies that the threat consists of at least the nearly half of the electorate that voted for President Donald Trump in 2020.

    It does so through invoking the Capitol Riot as typifying the domestic terror threat, warning of “narratives of fraud in the recent general election” that could spur forthcoming attacks and focusing on “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists” and “anti-government or anti-authority extremists”—the kind of “extremism” the Left cynically conflates with mainstream conservatism.

    This is demonstrated, for example, in the casting of President Trump, his supporters and their shared views as “white supremacist,” the claim that the Capitol Riot Trump purportedly incited was rooted in “white supremacism” (as Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently declared) and in arguments that electoral integrity laws are tantamount to “Jim Crow” (as President Joe Biden has asserted, and which is now buttressed by his Justice Department’s actions).

    The logic is as simple as it is horrifying:

    Kyle Shideler

    This is the logic of their current “counterterrorism” assault. Opposing the regime is racism, racism is terrorism, terrorism is a national security threat.


    Tom Elliott

    .@ SpeakerPelosi: “Root causes” of Capitol riot were “white supremacy, anti-Semitism, islamophobia”

    The strategy also never substantiates its claims that the violent extremists to whom it refers pose such a pervasive threat to the homeland as to demand the whole-of-government, if not whole-of-society, plan laid out.

    It expects us to rely on a politicized Biden administration-led intelligence assessment that downplays threats from the Left while providing little to justify its conclusions. Related dubious threat bulletins ought to only augment our skepticism.

    The strategy treats January 6—in spite of the collapsing narrative that it represented a murderous, [unarmed -Kj] armed insurrection that threatened to topple the republic—as a domestic terror attack of paramount importance, while ignoring the death and destruction inflicted by the likes of Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) during last summer’s 1619 Riots.

    Law enforcement, it is worth noting, has demonstrated an apparent double standard in its pursuit of those committing such acts.

    The document goes so far as to reclassify the few attacks from the Left that it does cite so as to avoid the “racially motivated” label. Worse, the strategy completely disregards the threat of jihadists to the homeland. How could any serious, apolitical strategy on domestic terror ignore the Islamic supremacists who have killed more Americans than any other group over the last generation?

    The strategy seems to acknowledge past failings to protect civil liberties in pursuing domestic threats, but then tells us that somehow, the very national security and intelligence apparatus hyper-politicized and weaponized at the highest levels over the last four-plus years will now “do better” by working with all relevant “stakeholders.”

    The strategy purports, in the words of a senior administration official, to “creat[e] contexts in which those who are family members or friends or co-workers know that there are pathways and avenues to raise concerns and seek help for those who they have perceived to be radicalizing and potentially radicalizing towards violence.”

    While nations must of course be vigilant about legitimate national security threats, surveilling those near and dear to us based on vague notions of “radicalization” never defined is the stuff of third-world banana republics.

    The strategy leaves the door open for the U.S. government to collude with foreign intelligence services in pursuing Americans.

    [Actually, this is nothing new. What the US gov couldn’t legally do to American citizens, they asked foreign intelligence, Mossad or MI6, to do it for them in whatever arcane mutual intelligence sharing agreements there are. – Kj]

    The strategy speaks of the U.S. government partnering with Big Tech and other ostensibly private actors in pursuit of the threats it purports to identify. What could possibly go wrong?

    The strategy also calls for authorities “to counter the influence and impact of dangerous conspiracy theories,” which it suggests “can provide a gateway to terrorist violence.”

    The strategy notes that “the Department of Homeland Security and others are either currently funding and implementing or planning evidence-based digital programming, including enhancing media literacy and critical thinking skills, as a mechanism for strengthening user resilience to disinformation and misinformation online for domestic audiences.”

    Where the strategy believes it derives this legal authority or social legitimacy is unclear. What is clear is that such a policy is incompatible with basic freedom and republican self-governance.

    It is the document’s close that reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that the strategy is about forcibly imposing the regime’s ruling ideology.

    In a section titled “Confront Long-Term Contributors to Domestic Terrorism,” the strategy calls for combating domestic terrorism through anti-racism. “[T]ackling the threat posed by domestic terrorism over the long term,” the document reads, “demands…prioritizing efforts to ensure that every component of the government has a role to play in rooting out racism and advancing equity.”

    Anti-racist “equity,” which as the Left uses it is antithetical to real “equality,” calls for overtly discriminating against individuals and removing justice’s blindfold. The goal is to use policy to socially engineer the citizenry so that all outcomes are proportional to group identity.

    Applied Critical Race Theory, in other words, is now set to be our domestic counterterrorism strategy.

    Meanwhile, as a corollary to the Biden administration mantra that everything is infrastructure, infrastructure would seem to constitute counterterror strategy.

    Citing financial relief measures contributing to “an equitable economic recovery that can counter the economic dislocation and even despair felt by many Americans,” the strategy notes that “economic recovery and sustainable development” policies will be geared toward “alleviating over time the sentiments that some domestic terrorists deliberately use to recruit and mobilize.”

    We need to implement progressive policies, in other words, to fight the material “root causes” of domestic terror.

    Last but not least, the Biden regime calls for—what else—protecting and preserving its power and privilege. The strategy notes a broader priority: “enhancing faith in government and addressing the extreme polarization, fueled by a crisis of disinformation and misinformation often channeled through social media platforms.”

    To do so, it calls for “accelerating work to contend with an information environment that challenges healthy democratic discourse” and, again, working to “counter the influence and impact of dangerous conspiracy theories” that it claims lead to terrorist violence.

    Controlling the narrative is now domestic counterterrorism strategy—as is ensuring that “the institutions” remain dominant, no matter how illegitimate and unrepresentative their actions may well be.

    Any backlash cannot be tolerated and must be crushed—hence the rolling effort to destroy Trump, and now this effort to silence and chill tens of millions of his supporters by treating them as actual or would-be domestic terrorists.

    The terrors this document could unleash may well prove far more profound and long-lasting than the ill-defined threats it purports to counter.

    Ben Weingarten is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, fellow at the Claremont Institute and senior contributor to The Federalist

    National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism

  26. Greg July 1, 2021 @ 9:16 pm

    We know from the past how they do the mass killings and mop ups of White Gentiles.

    World Wars of Europe, American Civil War, Korea, Vietnam, which includes sending younger white boys overseas never to return.

    And now with the continuation of the vaccines and booster shots filled with poison, it has revealed the script: Persuade White Gentiles to kill each other and themselves.

    The remaining White Gentiles that go along with it, get to live until they are disposed of in the next mop up, until there are no more. The churches have been infiltrated, so it is difficult for White Gentiles to organize on a mass level.

    How can White Christian Gentiles unite and overcome all of the obstacles to form an organization that protects their way of life?

  27. KathJuliane July 2, 2021 @ 12:41 am

    NEW – Looks like Facebook’s AI is now starting to “think” about your exposure to “harmful extremist content” and your “extremist” friends.


    Tech pro tip: Do NOT press the “Get Support” button.


    >Zuckface is right in synch with (drumroll, please)…

    DHS Warns of White Supremacist-Connected Terrorism During Fourth of July Weekend – Admits There is No Specific Plot

    Gateway Pundit

    30 June, 2021

    A new Department of Homeland Security bulletin is warning that “violent extremists might seek to exploit easing COVID-19 restrictions, increased access to mass gatherings, and possible changes in levels of violence during the summer months to conduct attacks against a range of potential targets with little or no warning.”

    The bulletin, obtained by ABC News, says there is no specific terrorist plot for the 4th of July, but noted that feds are seeing evidence of planning by radical white supremacists after monitoring online chatter.

    ABC News reported:

    Federal authorities are deeply concerned about the possibility of domestic terror and violence, including mass shootings, as the Fourth of July holiday approaches and the summer season gets fully underway.

    “In recent weeks, domestic violent extremists (DVEs) motivated by various violent ideologies have continued to advocate violence and plan attacks,” the bulletin said.

    “As of 16 June, racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist-white supremacists (RMVE-WSs) were sharing downloadable links to a publication discussing targeting mass gatherings, critical infrastructure, and law enforcement officers.”

    While no specific plot has been identified for Independence Day, the intelligence brief ominously notes that federal officials are seeing evidence of planning by radicals — particularly white supremacists and violence-prone people.

    “The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is focused on the nexus between violence, and extremist ideologies,” the DHS said in a statement to ABC News.

    “DHS is enhancing its ability to prevent acts of domestic terrorism inspired by disinformation, conspiracy theories, and false narratives spread through social media and other online platforms.

    “DHS is committed to sharing information with our partners to ensure the safety and security of all communities across the country. We encourage the public to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity to local and state law enforcement, and the FBI.”


    They’re going to do this every holiday now. Just remember, Critical Race Theory is nothing but Anti-White Racism.

    I have some things to say to Cuban-born immigrant, naturalized US citizen, Judeo-Cubano Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, scion of an expat elite Judeo-Cubano family with the bonus of being a 2nd generation shoah survivor, who then went on to live a privileged existence in the US, first in Florida and then in Beverley Hills, California:

    Hey, Mayorkas! Patriotic political dissent does not equal “violent domestic extremism”. There is no “White nationalist” domestic terror threat. There have been a few incidents of unhinged, mentally ill, emotionally unstable white individuals who have acted on their own and committed mass murder for whatever reasons over the years. That doesn’t prove that there is any kind of violent “white supremacist” movement in the aggregate.

    You, sir, are the racist. To kick off your Domestic War on Terror, thus marking a new phase of history for the Department of Homeland Insecurity, are you going to reinstate the stupid color coded warning system that the first DHS Secretary Tom Ridge created as “a national framework and a common vocabulary” so that government and the private sector can deal effectively and efficiently with threats of [Islamic] terrorist attack” back in 2002?

    Poached from Wikipedia:

    Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, nicknamed Ali, was born in Havana, Cuba, on November 24, 1959. When he was one year old, his parents fled with him and his sister to the United States in 1960 as refugees, following the Cuban Revolution.

    He lived in Miami, Florida, before his family moved to Los Angeles, California, where he was raised for the remainder of his youth. Mayorkas grew up in Beverly Hills and attended Beverly Hills High School.

    His father, Charles R. “Nicky” Mayorkas, was born in Cuba. He was a Cuban Jew of Sephardi (from the former Ottoman Empire, present-day Turkey and Greece) and Ashkenazi (from Poland) background.

    He owned and operated a steel wool factory on the outskirts of Havana. Nicky Mayorkas studied economics at Dartmouth College.

    His mother, Anita (Gabor),was a Romanian Jew whose family escaped the Holocaust and fled to Cuba in the 1940s.The Cuban Revolution marked the second time his mother would be forced to flee a country she considered home.

    Mayorkas earned his Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1981.[25] He received his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School in 1985.

    Obviously, “Ali,” your parents came away from Cuba with a lot of gold and silver shekels in their pockets. There is just no such thing as growing up poor in Beverley Hills.

    As Glen Greenwald wrote at the beginning of June in his Substack piece about your Clown World terror:


    The New Domestic War on Terror Has Already Begun — Even Without the New Laws Biden Wants

    Homeland Security just issued its fourth danger bulletin this year. And both the weapons and rhetorical tactics of the first War on Terror are increasingly visible.

    The Department of Homeland Security on Friday issued a new warning bulletin, alerting Americans that domestic extremists may well use violence on the 100th Anniversary of the Tulsa race massacre.

    This was at least the fourth such bulletin issued this year by Homeland Security (DHS) warning of the same danger and, thus far, none of the fears it is trying to instill into the American population has materialized.


    Just like the first War on Terror, these threats are issued with virtually no specificity. They are just generalized warnings designed to put people in fear about their fellow citizens and to justify aggressive deployment of military and law enforcement officers in Washington, D.C. and throughout the country. {snip}


    Americans have seen this scam before. Throughout the first War on Terror, DHS, which was created in 2002, was frequently used to keep fear levels high and thus foster support for draconian government powers of spying, detention, and war.

    Even prior to the Department’s creation, its first Secretary, Tom Ridge, when he was still the White House’s Homeland Security Chief in early 2002, created an elaborate color-coded warning system to supply a constant alert to Americans about the evolving threat levels they faced from Islamic extremists.


    Fear is crucial for state authority. When the population is filled with it, they will acquiesce to virtually any power the government seeks to acquire in the name of keeping them safe.


    Must read:

  28. KathJuliane July 2, 2021 @ 1:24 am

    Speaking of the Lizard from Mallorca

    Man Sends Lizard Saliva In To ’23 & Me’ for DNA testing, gets incredible results! (video 1 m)

    Posted By: GeorgeEaton
    Date: Wednesday, 23-Jun-2021 06:24:20


    Results Show The (Lizard) To Be 51% Ashkenazi Jewish And 48% West Asian

    Be Sure To Send Your Money To ’23 & Me’ – Watch LOL


    Well then, it proves that:

    1) 23andMe results are 100% accurate (“Ashkenazim” & related are people of the Great Serpent);
    2) David Icke was RIGHT.

    51% Ashkenazi Jewish? Sounds like the test is accurate!

    Do a snake next.

    This is freaking GREAT! Thank you for sharing!!

    Looks like a Rothschild.

  29. KathJuliane July 2, 2021 @ 11:25 am

    Systemic Racism Illustrated

    Paul Craig Roberts


  30. KathJuliane July 2, 2021 @ 11:54 am

    If you haven’t dumped Zuckface by now, its time to do so.

    The Harris-Obiden administration has jobbed out government surveillance and censorship to their partnership with the Big Tech private quasi-public utility behemoths which are not subject to constitutional limitations.

    Remember, an “extremist” to Harris-Obiden-Zuckface is someone who is patriotically motivated to defend the American Republic and follow the Constitution.

    An extremist in Zuckface’s book is someone who doesn’t agree with the Harris-Obiden Woke agenda, Big Tech privatized censorship, mind control, and social engineering; who stands in dissident opposition to the current Technocratic Neo-Marxist/Leninist Social Democrat administration and the neo-corporate fascist deep state it partners with, which the uniparty leader Pelosi, Queen-High Priestess of the Capitol “temple,” worshipfully calls ‘Our Democracy’™ (just like all good uniparty commie states do, comrade).

    Too much power makes elites insane.


    From behind the paywall:

    Facebook Now Sending Messages to Some Users Asking About Potentially ‘Extremist’ Friends

    Epoch Times

    BY JACK PHILLIPS July 1, 2021

    Some Facebook users have recently reported being sent warning messages from the social media giant relating to “extremists” or “extremist content.”

    “Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist?” one message reads. “We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your situation have received confidential support.”

    The message also provides a button to “Get Support,” which leads to another Facebook page about extremism.

    Redstate editor Kira Davis, who said was sent a screenshot of the message from a friend, wrote: “Hey has anyone had this message pop up on their FB? My friend (who is not an ideologue but hosts lots of competing chatter) got this message twice. He’s very disturbed.”

    And others reported getting a warning that they may have been “exposed to harmful extremist content recently.” The message then states that “violent groups try to manipulate your anger and disappointment,” similarly offering a “Get Support” option.

    “Facebook randomly sent me this notice about extremism when I clicked over to the app. Pretty weird. … The Get Support button just goes to a short article asking people not to be hateful,” another user on Twitter wrote.

    A Facebook spokesperson confirmed to The Epoch Times on July 1 that the company is currently running the warnings as a test to some users.

    “This test is part of our larger work to assess ways to provide resources and support to people on Facebook who may have engaged with or were exposed to extremist content, or may know someone who is at risk. We are partnering with NGOs and academic experts in this space and hope to have more to share in the future,” the spokesperson said, without elaborating.

    The messages come after lawmakers have repeatedly targeted and pressured CEOs of big tech firms such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Microsoft, essentially accusing them of allowing “extremism,” misinformation, and cyberbullying on their platforms.

    Such social media companies have faced criticism from Republicans who have accused them of censoring conservative voices and limiting the reach—or outright blocking—content that portrays Democrat political figures in a negative light.

    Conservatives, including former President Donald Trump, have argued for the revocation of Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act, which serves as a liability shield for online publishers.

    However, the movement to rein in Big Tech was dealt a blow earlier this week when a federal judge tossed a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit against Facebook that had accused the firm of engaging in anti-competitive practices.

    These warning messages, however, are sure to trigger even more negative feedback against Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, over fears that the company is attempting to stifle free speech.

    On Twitter, as screenshots of the warning messages were being shared en masse on July 1, many users expressed concern over the direction Facebook is taking.

  31. benzion kook July 3, 2021 @ 12:11 am


    If mommy’s not a commie, ya gotta turn her in.

  32. Ted Gorsline July 3, 2021 @ 3:26 am

    I read a great story today about how jew boy Ben Shapiro has paid Facebook almost $3 million to keep his profile up. He advertises himself.

    I wondered about him when he was first piggy backed onto Jordan Peterson, a real intellectual goy boy who bites the bullet and even calls Shapiro “smart” (Peterson knows where his bear is buttered).

    Shapiro is a dick head with nothing to say that is worth listening to. He is a time waster who keeps trying to say there is a judea0/Christian philosphy when the truth is the Bible and the Talmud are at opposite ends of the moral spectrum.

    There is nothing Shapiro does that would get him the $3 million to boost his profile. He is a plant. Somebody else is footing the bill. Probably the Mossad and at the very least Zionist interests.

  33. The Englishman July 3, 2021 @ 6:44 am

    The time is being thrust on Good men, the time when the destroyers of God’s creations and laws will inevitably be upon them to slay the Satanic “Wokeism” Plaguing the world.

    Solomon came to recognize the futility of life without God, and this wisest of all kings, whose understanding and wisdom surpasses all others, finally reached his ultimate conclusion, which contains prudent counsel for every-man, “fear God, and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.”

  34. RecallCarlLevin July 3, 2021 @ 6:53 am

    Bro Nathanael,

    You’ve done more than anyone else to awaken the American people to the JQ.

    What should we do now?

  35. KathJuliane July 3, 2021 @ 9:31 am

    Bidenist Occupational Government Threatens Citizens with Nukes & F-15s, Forcibly Re-Educates Political Prisoners of January 6

    The Stream

    By John Zmirak Published on June 30, 2021

    The election of Joe Biden was perfectly honest, transparent and legitimate. That’s why it’s so important that nobody look at the ballots, re-examine the signatures, or question how they were counted. And the Supreme Court knew that Texas’ lawsuit about the election was completely devoid of merit.

    So meritless that seven justices judged it dangerous even to read it and consider it. They knew it must be dismissed on fake technicalities, then carried to the biohazard containment unit by workers in hazmat suits. Because that’s how groundless arguments need to be treated.

    For the very reason that there’s nothing to hide, those who try to look must be demonized and punished, deplatformed and disbarred. There’s nothing to the theory that the left colluded with billion-dollar corporations and Woke media to brainwash voters, bury crucial facts, and steal the White House.

    It’s crackpot insanity. And that is why anybody who says otherwise needs to be silenced, bankrupted, or locked up in solitary confinement for months. Because the truth is so fragile, you see. It must be accompanied by a bodyguard of storm troopers and snitches.

    >You Are Dangerous Haters Who Shouldn’t Have Pointy Objects

    The great mass of Americans are such irrational hotheads with such a tenuous grasp on reality that elites need to manage them carefully. Keep them on a steady morphine drip of Pride Month happy talk.

    Rouse them periodically for Two Minutes Hate against whites, and take away their weapons. Better yet, pummel learned helplessness into their Deplorable, mulleted heads by threatening to use their own military against them.

    That’s what Joe Biden did recently, echoing his fellow Chinese intelligence asset Rep. Eric Swalwell. (Maybe they have the same handler over in Beijing. China knows the value of keeping the citizens helpless against their rulers.)

    Business Insider quotes Biden:

    President Joe Biden joked that people who think they needed guns to take on the US government would actually need nuclear weapons.

    In a speech on Wednesday that outlined his plan to combat gun violence, Biden said, “If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.”

    >You Want One Vast Afghanistan? We Can Do That.

    My favorite response to this quip came in the form of a Tweet. It quoted Biden alongside a picture of a smiling Viet Cong soldier. They might just as well have used an Afghan fighter of the Taliban.

    Those two groups showed America just how useless massive terror weapons are. At least when you’re trying to pacify and rule a people who don’t want to be ruled. Do the Democrats want to see an Afghanistan reaching from Seattle down to Miami? That’s what they’re going to get if they try to tyrannize Americans.

    The US founders intended an armed citizenry as the last backstop against the tyranny of corrupt, foreign-owned oligarchs like Biden. But he has embraced the radical theories of those who hate us and our history.

    Our founders knew that the greatest military force yet in history, the British Empire’s, proved powerless against millions of free, armed citizens.

    Would a Woke army, purged of “extremist” Christians but stuffed with trannies and Karens, really be up to the task? Could it conquer cities like Dallas block-by-block, while its F-15s whizzed overhead uselessly? These people can’t even keep order in their broken-down blue city dystopias like Portland.

    Come and take it, Sleepy Joe. Come and take it.

    >Brainwashing the Political Prisoners in D.C.

    Maybe I ought to calm down, take the nice meds the media offer us, and forget about archaic ideas like “freedom,” “biology,” “God,” and “property.”

    It would help if I could check in for few months of political re-education at taxpayer expense. That’s what peaceful protestors of the stolen 2020 election are enduring right now.

    Read Julie Kelly over at the indispensable American Greatness. Patriots charged with various shades of treason for taking selfies in the People’s House (Congress) find that their only way out of solitary confinement is … struggle sessions and brainwashing. Set up by … the lawyers allegedly defending them.

    [Quote] Anna Morgan-Lloyd [is] one of the more than 500 Americans arrested for her involvement in the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

    The 49-year-old grandmother of five from southern Indiana was charged with four counts of trespassing and disorderly conduct even though she walked through an open door and was inside the building for about five minutes. She was ratted out to the FBI by a county worker who saw her January 6 posts on Facebook.

    On Wednesday, Lloyd, who has a clean criminal record, pleaded guilty to one count of “parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building”—but not before she consented to undergo a reeducation exercise at the urging of her court-appointed lawyer. (Like many January 6 defendants, Lloyd does not have the means to hire a private attorney.)

    Heather Shaner, a D.C.-based criminal defense attorney representing a handful of January 6 protesters, does not share the political beliefs of her Capitol clients, which is why she’s forcing them to read books and watch movies highlighting dark chapters in U.S. history.

    In an interview with Huffington Post, Shaner explained her belief that “this is the most wonderful country in the world, it’s been great for all kinds of immigrant groups, except for the fact that it was born of genocide of the Native Americans and the enslavement of people.”

    Shaner’s legal captives are learning the hard way what the government will do when one resists their commands to comply. Not only have their personal lives been shattered, finances depleted, and reputations destroyed by an abusive Justice Department investigation, Shaner’s clients must be indoctrinated with leftist propaganda about America’s alleged systemic racism.

    “I have had many political and ethical discussions with Anna Lloyd,” Shaner wrote in her motion agreeing to the plea and probation for Lloyd. “I tendered a booklist to her. She has read Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Just Mercy, and Schindler’s List to educate herself about ‘government policy’ toward Native Americans, African Americans and European Jews. We have discussed the books and also about the responsibility of an individual when confronting ‘wrong.’” [Unquote]

    >You Deserve to Get Punched

    Protest election fraud in America, and you clearly need to learn about the Holocaust.

    Your own lawyer should be subjecting you to moral retraining, as if you were a war criminal.

    Because opposing the left makes you a “racist,” which is equal to being a Nazi, which means you deserve to get punched. Or locked up in solitary. Or bombed with your own government’s nukes, or strafed by its F-15s.

    But remember folks, we’re the extremists.

    Also see:

    ‘F-15s and nuclear weapons’: Biden brushes off point of 2nd Amendment & undermines ‘insurrection’ narrative in gun control push [& twitter responds]

    Deprogramming of January 6 Defendants Is Underway

    The entire investigation is an attempt to prosecute people based on their beliefs. Those who purge their views and admit their wrongthink will be given mercy. Those who don’t will pay dearly.

  36. KathJuliane July 3, 2021 @ 10:51 am

    Police Make Arrests After Armed Standoff With ‘Rise Of The Moors’ Group Near Boston
    Joe Walsh

    Forbes Staff

    Updated Jul 3, 2021, 11:32am EDT

    TOPLINE Police in Massachusetts say they’ve arrested 11 heavily armed members of a group called “Rise of the Moors” following an hours-long standoff in the middle of a highway Saturday morning, forcing two towns to ask residents to shelter in place.


    Early Saturday morning, police encountered almost a dozen people with guns and tactical gear on the side of Rt. 128 north of Boston, and after police shut down the highway, the men refused to put down their weapons, leading to a standoff with the group for more than eight hours, Massachusetts State Police spokesperson David Procopio told Forbes.

    Police arrested two men from the group after 6:30 a.m., and nine more were taken into custody after 10:30 a.m., fully clearing the highway.

    Procopio says the men have identified themselves on social media as members of “Rise of the Moors,” which describes itself as a group of Moorish Americans who see themselves as the aboriginal residents of North America, according to the group’s website.

    Police say the group indicated it “does not recognize our laws.”

    In a video posted to the Rise of the Moors’ apparent YouTube account Saturday morning, a man who appeared to be part of the standoff insisted the group does not identify as an anti-government or a sovereign citizen organization.


    The State Police say they’re sweeping two vehicles belonging to the group and searching a wooded area near the highway. The highway is still partially closed.


    Police asked residents of Wakefield and Reading, two suburban towns, to shelter in place early Saturday morning, but the advisory was lifted after police arrested all of the men.


    Based in Rhode Island, the Rise of the Moors say they follow the religious teachings of Noble Drew Ali, a North Carolina man who founded the Moorish Science Temple in the early 20th century.

    According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, some groups linked to the Moorish Science Temple are Black nationalist “sovereign citizens” who reject the U.S. government’s authority, though not all members identify with the extremist sovereign citizen movement, and the Moorish Science Temple has denounced anti-government ideologies.

    See: Daily Beast: Heavily Armed Militia Group Shut Down Massachusetts Highway in Bizarre Standoff


    Eleven men were arrested after being stopped while apparently driving to their “private land” to camp and “train” on Saturday.

    In a livestream video on the group’s YouTube page, a member of the group, dressed in camo gear, said they were traveling with gas tanks to refuel their cars so they could avoid “making any unnecessary stops” that might “alert or alarm the public.”
    Moorish Americans.

    This is a new emerging syncretic “autochthonous religion” for me, composed of “Olmecs, Moabites, Canaanites, Hittites” etc, although there seems to be some history going back to at least the early 1900s.

    I’m still getting my mind around “Black Hebrew Israelites” as an emerging religion.

    I guess NOI isn’t radical, syncretic, militant, or trendy enough anymore. Rise of the Moors state “We are Moorish Americans dedicated to educating new Moors and influencing our Elders”.

    Rise of the Moors – Mission Statement

    The main focus of Rise of the Moors is to perform all things relating to and appropriate to portraying the overall history of our ancestors – the Olmecs, Moabites, Canaanites, Hittites etc.; Informing all Moors of their political status here in the Maghreb Al Aqsa (America – Morocco the most extreme west); Enlighten the minds of the fallen Moors, restoring them the their ‘In Full Life,’ ‘In Propria Persona Sui Juris’ status, as opposed to the mentality of a minor who is ‘Civil liter Mortuus’; to promote a collective of Moorish Americans and connecting them to the Rise of the Moors social and economic platform; to promote the use of moral principles and the branches of knowledge dealing with ethical awareness; to encourage all Moorish Americans to believe in the capacity of each other to succeed in business, to encourage, support and provide patronage in our affairs.

    Our business endeavors will achieve its highest in fulfillment and confidence with the cooperation and patronage of all nationals and especially emphasized whenever possible between other Moorish Americans.

  37. KathJuliane July 3, 2021 @ 12:54 pm

    FBI warns millions of white supremacists to terrorize the country July 4 by having peaceful BBQ with friends


    July 3, 2021 – Exavier Saskagoochie (Satire)

    WASHINGTON, DC—The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been overwhelmed with reports of extremist white supremacists planning to terrorize America on July 4th by “celebrating independence” in peaceful barbecues with friends, an official report states.

    “Clearly, white supremacy is the biggest threat to the United States,” FBI Directed Christopher Wray said. “And we’re about to see the fruits of that in massive outdoor cook outs and barbeques across the countries.”

    The FBI warns that many millions of other people may be exposed to this extremist behavior by being invited to “knock back some cold ones, fire up the grill, and light some fireworks in honor of our country’s birthday.”

    “It’s really a frightening shame that so many people would dare to be so brazen with their white supremacy as to hold so many events across the country,” Wray added. “We were already overwhelmed investigating MAGA grandmas on a self-guided tour of the US Capitol on January 6th, but now we have to contend with this. It’s really almost too much.”

    The FBI adds that the white supremacy appears to be spreading as many black Americans appear to be celebrating independence with outdoor barbecues as well.

  38. KathJuliane July 3, 2021 @ 4:17 pm

    Who executed Ashli Babbitt?


    House Sergeant At Arms ‘Slips Up’ & May Have Just Revealed Name of Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter

    Becker News

    July 3, 2021 by Kyle Becker

    The Acting House Sergeant at Arms appeared before a House committee and appears to have named Ashli Babbitt’s shooter.

    Timothy Blodgett, in an exchange with Rep. Herrera-Buetler during a hearing on Jan. 6 that appeared on C-SPAN, seems to have casually dropped the name.

    “The situation where you discussed, where Officer [Byrd] was at the door when Ms. Babbitt was shot, it was our Sergeant at Arms employee who rendered the aid.”

    It is interesting that Blodgett names an “Officer Byrd” in the context of Ashli Babbitt’s shooting. An African-American Lieutenant Mike Byrd was reported by Roll Call as having once left his service weapon in a bathroom in 2019.

    “A U.S. Capitol Police lieutenant left his service weapon in a bathroom Monday night and the unattended gun was discovered later by another Capitol Police officer,” Roll Call reported.

    “After the House adjourned on Monday, Lt. Mike Byrd left his Glock 22 in a bathroom in the Capitol Visitor Center complex, according to sources familiar with the incident,” the report said. “Byrd is the commander of the House Chambers section of the Capitol Police and was on the job Tuesday and Wednesday.”

    “Byrd addressed the incident at Tuesday morning’s officer roll call and, according to sources, told fellow officers that he ‘will be treated differently’ because of his rank as a lieutenant,” the report added. “It was not clear what exactly the lieutenant meant by the comment.”

    The New York Times reported more information about the unidentified shooter in January, who called him a “lieutenant” and a “veteran officer.” He was not charged for excessive force or for negligence after shooting the unarmed woman.

    As far as the unidentified police officer is concerned, he is reportedly in hiding. The Capitol Police is directly supervised by the U.S. Congress, and is thus immune from subpoena.

    “More than six weeks after Babbitt succumbed to a single gunshot wound to the upper chest, authorities are keeping secret the identity of the officer who fired the fatal round,” Real Clear Investigations’ Paul Sperry noted.

    “They won’t release his name, and the major news media aren’t clamoring for it, in stark contrast to other high-profile police shootings of unarmed civilians.”

    “The officer who opened fire on Babbitt holds the rank of lieutenant and is a longtime veteran of the force who worked protective detail in the Speaker’s Lobby, a highly restricted area behind the House chamber, sources say,” Sperry notes.

    “An African-American, he was put on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an internal investigation led by the Metropolitan Police of the District of Columbia, which shares jurisdiction with the Capitol Police. The Justice Department is also involved in the inquiry.”

    In April, the Biden Department of Justice dropped all charges related to an unidentified Capitol police officer’s shooting of Ashli Babbitt.

    The unnamed capitol officer held aloft .40-caliber Glock handgun and pointed it at Babbitt, while Sullivan shouts repeatedly that “there is a gun.”

    The officer shoots her after about 15 seconds, while police officers look on without intervening. The video can be watched below and the incident begins about 45 minutes in (caution: graphic):

    A still image of Babbitt’s shooter from the publicly available video above is provided below.

    An African American man with a similar hairline and a bracelet or watch on his right wrist can be seen armed with a pistol on the House floor on Jan. 6.

    There has been recent speculation about the identity of the shooter.

    Specifically, there was an article in The Spectator that alleged the shooter was a member of Mike Pence’s Secret Service detail. This would not square with other reports in the press, but this does not immediately discount the conflicting report.

    Donald Trump recently asked a simple question: “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?” It appears that the current House Sergeant of Arms may have given the public a possible lead.


    Bringing up the speculation that it was one of VP Pence’s Secret Service detail who shot Ashli Babbit is nothing but speculation, and at worse a red herring, meant to muddy the waters and social media.

    Pence was evacuated from the Senate Chamber on the far east side of the Capitol Building past the central Rotunda, several hundred feet away from the House Chamber on the west side at the time of the breach.

    Pence and his Secret Service team were far away from where Ashli was shot.

    The only other person likely assigned Secret Service protection inside the Capitol Building at the time was Senator Kamala Harris attending the Electoral College count, as she was the apparent VP-elect, who was also evacuated from the Senate Chamber at the same time.

    Otherwise, all Senate and House Congresspersons on Capitol Hill grounds, especially the leadership of each chamber, are under the comparable jurisdiction of the US Capitol Police specialized personal dignitary protection teams.

    Ashli Babbitt was murdered, judging from the map of the Capitol compared with shooting photos, at the southern entrance to the Lobby of the Speaker of the House on the second floor, on the west side of the House Chamber.

    The House Chamber, because of a larger number of representatives in attendance, had been only partially evacuated. Therefore, the shooter was a US Capitol Police special protection unit either assigned to the House Chamber, or else to a particular House leader.

    Since Pence was not in the House Chamber at the time, there would be no reason for any Secret Service personnel to be there.

    This is all on the Capitol Police and the “mayor” of Capitol Hill, Speaker Pelosi, the authority to whom the Capitol Police and the respective Sargeants-at-Arms are ultimately answerable to.

    Of course San Fran Nan is very hot for a “January 6th Truth Commission” to further cover things up, and obscure even further whatever part she played in it all, and what orders she gave to shady groups linked to Pelosi and the Democrats to infiltrate and sabotage the Stop the Steal rallies.

  39. KathJuliane July 3, 2021 @ 5:46 pm

    CSPAN original starts at 39:40:

    “The situation where you discussed, where Officer Byrd was at the door when Ms. Babbitt was shot, it was our Sergeant at Arms employee who rendered the aid.”

    They tried to bury the shooter’s name by omitting it from the CSPAN transcript.

  40. NO MORE WARS FOR THE JEWS July 4, 2021 @ 6:38 am

    Satanic genocide plan.

    ARREST Fauci
    ARREST Rockefellers

    JUST IN: Jim Jordan Attacks Fauci’s Actions At Start Of COVID-19 Pandemic


  41. benzion kook July 4, 2021 @ 11:24 am

    Slavery? Here are the facts on slavery.

    Black slaves were initially enslaved by other blacks, who sold them to other Africans and Arabs, who sold them to jews who ran the Trans-Atlantic slave trade out of England, Holland and Portugal.

    The highest per capita percentage of slave owners in America were so-called “Free Blacks,” then came the Cherokees. Most whites never owned any slaves, in fact, many were themselves so-called “indentured servants.”

    All this current racial nonsense is another attempt by lying extremist jews to weaponize fools against all Europeans, destroy America, and set-up the USSA.

    1 Kings, chapter 9, verses 20-21: “As for all the people that were left of the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, who were not of the children of Israel; their children that were left after them in the land, whom the children of Israel were not able to utterly destroy, of them did Shlomo raise a levy of bond servants unto this day.”

  42. KathJuliane July 4, 2021 @ 1:48 pm

    Jew-loving, arch-Zionist President Pro-Abortion at work in the White House.


    Biden Kneels Before Rivlin’s ultra-Orthodox Aide After Learning She Has 12 Children

    Expressing admiration, Biden kneels before Rivka Ravitz, a key adviser of Rivlin for years who runs a household of 13 in addition to her demanding job


    July 4, 2021

    President Joe Biden has had four children of his own, but he is clearly impressed by mothers who raise more.

    In a meeting with Israel’s outgoing president Reuven Rivlin at the White House on Monday, Biden knelt before Rivlin’s bureau chief, an ultra- Orthodox woman named Rivka Ravitz, in deference to the fact that she has 12 children.

    The news site reported on the moment, based on photos taken of the encounter by reporters accompanying the Israeli presidential delegation.

    Rivlin had mentioned to Biden that Ravitz, 45, a key adviser for years, runs a household of 13 in addition to her demanding job when the president knelt before her to express his admiration. Rivlin clasped his hands in apparent surprise as he and Ravitz looked down on Biden, who lowered one knee to the floor and bowed his head.

    Rivlin will be replaced as president next week by Isaac Herzog, who headed the Jewish Agency. The trip to the United States is Rivlin’s last overseas trip as president.

    Ravitz’s father was born in the United States. She studied to be a teacher in Jerusalem and became a parliamentary aide to the late Avraham Ravitz, a haredi communal leader and former lawmaker in the Knesset, Israel’s parliament. He was her father-in-law. She began working for Rivlin in 1999, when he was a lawmaker.

    Burn this vision of US Potus glory in your brain, on bended knee with bowed head before the almighty Jew.

    And people thought Obama doing a standing bow to the Saudi king was horrible enough.

  43. Charles G Laird July 4, 2021 @ 2:48 pm

    Even while he was exploiting the Negro to a degree which few white people ever realized, the Jew was also using the Negro as his expendable troops in the front line of the Communist conspiracy in America.

    This dated back to 1912, when the prominent Jewish writer and Communist theoretician, Israel Cohen, wrote an extensive plan called “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century”.

    We quote in part,

    “We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. The terms colonialism and imperialism must be featured in our propaganda.

    “In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.

    “We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

  44. KathJuliane July 4, 2021 @ 7:01 pm

    Oops, Jerusalem Post.

    Pardon, but your white-hating, Jewish race-baiting agenda is showing.

    We saw what you did.

    Switching the photo out for a scene doesn’t change things at all.


    Jerusalem Post Uses Photo Of White Men With Confederate Flags To Describe ‘Rise of the Moors’ Militia Movement For Black Men

    Jerusalem Post uses a photo of white men to describe a black militia group called “Rise of the Moors” represented by a man named Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey

    National File

    July 4, 2021

    The Jerusalem Post is under fire for using a photo of white men wearing combat vests featuring Confederate battle flags in an article about the armed standoff between the “Rise of the Moors” black militia group and Boston law enforcement.

    The Jerusalem Post used the image of white men with Confederate battle flag emblems for its article, “Two arrested as armed militia group stands off with police in Boston”.

    The image shows two men, one clearly armed with a rifle, wearing vests and camouflage. One man has what appears to be a three-percenter militia emblem crossed with a Confederate battle flag.

    However, the “Rise of the Moors” militia group appears to be comprised of black men. While their belief structure is unclear at present, including whether it may revolve around Islam, it appears the militia believed they were legally exercising their Second Amendment rights to possess and carry firearms.

    According to local media, a man who identifies as Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey live streamed part of the standoff on YouTube. “They specified in the news that we’re anti government, but we’re not, we’re not anti police, we’re not sovereign citizens, we’re not black identity extremists,” said Bey, who asserted that no laws were being broken by the armed group. “We haven’t violated any laws, the police seen us on the side of the road with our guns secured, we were afraid so we got out with our arms.”

    Radio host Dave Reilly slammed the publication’s decision to use the image, which he said shows a man named Andrew Dobson.

    “The group today in Boston were BLACK people and you’re using a photo of a GOOD man @ Charlottesville who’s now DEAD because he relapsed because of hit pieces about him from ppl like you!” Reilly added, “Scum!”

    Harrison Smith, the host of Infowars morning show The American Journal, added, “What a despicably deceptive image for the @Jerusalem_Post to use. Pure blood-libel.”

    National File contacted the Jerusalem Post to determine if the image was used by mistake, and, if so, whether the publication intends to use a different image.

    National File also asked if Jerusalem Post is aware that Twitter allows individuals to rapidly change the image used in a Twitter post, if it intends to apologize to the individuals pictured in the image, and if it believes the image is a fair and accurate way to describe the “Rise of the Moors” group.

    National File did not receive a response in time for publication.

  45. Aglan July 5, 2021 @ 2:01 am

    Only this prayer will bring lasting peace:

    “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Father, send now Your Spirit over the earth.

    Let the Holy Spirit live in the hearts of all nations, that they may be preserved from degeneration, disaster and war.

    May the Lady of All Nations, who once was Mary, be our Advocate.


    FYI: exactly ten years before communism came to an end in Eastern Europe in 1989, Pope John-Paul II made the following invocation during an outdoor Mass in Warsaw (June 2nd 1979):

    “And I cry — I who am a Son of the land of Poland and who am also Pope John Paul II — I cry from all the depths of this Millennium, I cry on the vigil of Pentecost:

    Let your Spirit descend.
    Let your Spirit descend,
    and renew the face of the earth,
    the face of this land.


  46. KathJuliane July 5, 2021 @ 1:13 pm

    Diagnosing the Right as Pathological

    Chronicles Magazine

    By Christopher Roach

    While President Joe Biden was supposed to turn down the temperature and restore normalcy to our political life, rhetoric from those in power increasingly echoes with dark references to “homegrown terrorists” and “extremists” emerging from a process of radicalization.

    For months after the inauguration, the ruling class maintained Washington, D.C. as a fortress city, complete with a Green Zone. The FBI, Justice Department, the Pentagon, and Biden himself have all said that countering extremism is now their first priority.

    The left’s disparate factions united for a time around their opposition to the unorthodox Donald Trump. Having removed him from office and prevailed upon social media monopolies to silence him, the left is like the dog that caught the car: Trump’s absence leaves them in need of a new cause.

    The left’s internal need for a common enemy, more than the facts, explains their campaign to categorize Trump voters, and the right in general, as extreme. Countering extremism is the new unifying principle of the left.

    Media figures, politicians, and law enforcement executives describe extremism as the end product of “radicalization.”

    The narrative of radicalization includes several layers of misrepresentation. First, the left defines right-wing beliefs as extreme by reference not to actual moderation, but to the revolutionary modern center.

    Then, they describe these beliefs themselves as a type of violent threat. Finally, they move the disagreement from the realm of politics into the more intrusive realm of psychology, where right-wing beliefs are treated as a type of mental illness.

    Extremism is, by its nature, defined by reference to a political center. In a time of harmony and consensus, the center is where most people happily reside. But in a revolutionary age the ranks of extremists grow even among those who do not change as the center moves further left. Since the 1960s we have lived in a revolutionary age.

    Thus, the revolutionary ruling class labels as extremists those who only a decade ago would have been called moderates.

    Their opinions and thoughts are now dismissed as disinformation. Those who are younger and uncomfortable with society’s leftward drift are commonly described as going through a process of radicalization. If they come to these beliefs alone, seeking out information from the dissident right ecosphere, they are said to have “self-radicalized.”

    These descriptions implicitly assume that the center is correct and unassailable. Voices invoking the specter of extremism do not question whether the current center—a commitment to international empire, multiculturalism, open borders, job-destroying globalism, financialization, transgenderism, and social engineering—is a reasonable one.

    The managerial left, whether in the White House, the FBI, or the media, does not engage with supposed extremists on the merits of their arguments, and they do not try to understand their grievances, as they do with aggrieved anti-Western extremists, such as jihadists or black nationalists.

    Rather, leftist managerialism treats almost every political question as having been “settled” through a combination of self-evident moral axioms and highly technical analysis. For them, there is a single correct answer, one derived by credentialed experts, and any failure to endorse the ever-changing, left-moving center is pathological and unusual.

    The left’s assumption that questions of law and politics are “settled” directly opposes the beliefs undergirding the American constitutional order, including formerly universal commitments to free speech and republican self-government.

    Free speech presupposes that there are multiple competing viewpoints, that the best answers are distilled from the cauldron of debate and discussion, and that no single person has all the correct answers. For these reasons, it would impair the search for truth to have competing views, particularly outsider views, censored.

    Self-government and voting assume one of the components of legitimacy is the “consent of the governed.”

    Instead of every political question being a matter of technical analysis, the principle of consent presupposes that individual interests and individual opinions are relevant and worthy of accommodation and inclusion in crafting policy. After all, many political questions are mixed questions of fact and value, including prioritization of values.

    All the usual rituals of compromise and give-and-take are undermined by the imperative of policing extremism and detecting radicalization. Deeming these complex and debatable issues “settled,” the ruling faction uses the same language one employs against scammers and foreign enemies.

    For example, a National Public Radio headline from earlier this year about the online popularity of right-wing media outlets like Breitbart and NewsMax read, “Far-Right Misinformation Is Thriving On Facebook.”

    Concern over right-wing extremism is more than a media fixation. Anti-extremism implicates every department of the administrative state.

    In February, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin ordered a 60-day “stand-down” across all branches to discuss the problem of extremists within the ranks, which apparently has required teach-ins and struggle sessions for the entire military.

    The most prominent example of the left’s campaign to pathologize the right was its overreaction to the Jan. 6 protests at the Capitol.

    FBI Director Christopher Wray spoke of the Jan. 6 protests in exaggerated terms. “That attack, that siege, was criminal behavior, plain and simple, and it’s behavior that we, the FBI, view as domestic terrorism,” Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    The FBI also manages a program of “deradicalization” aimed at young people and educators, entitled “Don’t Be a Puppet.”

    The Capitol protests were, after all, mostly symbolic in nature. A medical examination confirmed that the death of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was due to a natural cause—a stroke—unravelling the attempt to make him into a martyr of right-wing violence.

    But the Capitol protest did unmistakably communicate widespread anger, fearlessness, and contempt for the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

    This loss of legitimacy has frightened a ruling class increasingly detached from ordinary Americans. Rather than aiming to persuade, the managerial left has moved on to draconian force.

    They’ve labeled the trespassing that occurred on Jan. 6 as treason, put up billboards seeking suspects all around the country, and arrested nonviolent suspects using SWAT teams.

    Of course, trespassing is a crime—though normally a misdemeanor—and protests sometimes get out of hand or include deliberate civil disobedience.

    What shocked the ruling class was not the tactics or the crimes of the Capitol protests, which were tame compared to the Black Lives Matter and Antifa protests that occurred in many other American cities last summer, but that it was a protest from ordinary, middle-class Americans on the right.

    The right has been, until now, mostly respectful of the government and its authority. Leftists in power could always appeal to the right’s sense of patriotism and decorum to keep it in line.

    When Antifa and black nationalists tore down cities all summer, the right mostly reacted to these events with quiet resignation and a commitment to work within a system they regarded as legitimate.

    While not an insurrection, the Jan. 6 protest was a serious break from previous patterns. That half or more of Republicans think the election was stolen is a real problem for perceived legitimacy of the ruling class.

    The ideological tone and aggression of the left’s prosecutions of the Jan. 6 participants is evident in the effort to deny suspects bail.

    Federal prosecutors argued one elderly Virginia defendant, disabled veteran Thomas Caldwell, should remain behind bars until his trial because he believes the 2020 election was stolen.

    The extent and vigor of the dragnet against “domestic violent extremists” rivals earlier campaigns against Islamic radicals and communists.

    It amounts to a declaration of war against a large cohort of American citizens because of their beliefs.

    “I think, for me, Jan. 6th really ended the post-9/11 era, those 20 years where the threats came from abroad into the United States,” Congressman Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA analyst and Pentagon official, said in an interview with NPR. “And it inaugurated another era, which is where the divisiveness between us as Americans is, I believe, the greatest threat to our national security.”

    Like many in the government, Slotkin has forgotten one of the more obvious lessons of the campaign against Al Qaeda. An oppressive and heavy-handed response risks becoming the real engine of extremism, playing into the fears of the aggrieved, while giving their compatriots cause for revenge and retaliation.

    The legacy media, social media giants, the FBI, and Justice Department act as if there is one—and only one—correct view on the election, and that failure to endorse the official view is a sign, not only of being wrong, but of being evil and potentially violent.

    We have seen this demand for uniformity in other instances, including global warming, COVID-19, and, for that matter, the supposed illegitimacy of Trump’s election in 2016, which official voices described as marred by Russian interference.

    The ruling party displays an unusual concern regarding private beliefs. It’s not enough for citizens to obey the government out of fear, prudence, or habit. One must publicly affirm the legitimacy of Biden’s election in 2020.

    Official discussions of extremism follow a disease model. Radicalization is treated as large-scale brainwashing, in which otherwise sane people contract strange beliefs and violent tendencies that would normally be anathema.

    As with purely psychological accounts of suicide, this model largely dismisses the possibility that a whole society may be sick and driving people to despair, or that the reactions and beliefs of the radicals may be reasonable in light of their perception of circumstances.

    By treating the right’s beliefs like a strange disease, and not the product of a rational process, the left never takes any of the right’s ideas, beliefs, or criticisms seriously.

    Right-leaning views generally do not arise from exclusive contact with official news, much of which consists of “fake news.” Those on the right tend to seek out alternative sources, not least because the official stories contradict what their own eyes and ears show them to be true.

    Thus, the right has a higher proportion of autodidacts and skeptics. Such people are more confident, curious, and independent and, therefore, prone to “radicalization.”

    The radicalization label deliberately obscures the distinction between ideas and actions. For the ruling class, expressions of belief and actual violence are conjoined morally, even though actual political violence on the right has only been undertaken by a tiny number of people.

    We have seen this occur regarding critical discussions of the election. Election skepticism is now treated as one step removed from imitating Guy Fawkes. Those who ask empirical questions regarding voting rolls and statistical anomalies are deemed guilty by association.

    The term “radicalization” gained prominence during the War on Terror. Official guidance described certain Muslims as “vulnerable” to radicalization, as if the combination of their religious beliefs and their alienation from Western society were not enough to describe their turn towards violence.

    The latter account would describe things accurately, but also have significant implications for the left’s immigration and multiculturalism policies. Radicalization became the watchword instead. Islam, after all, is a Religion of Peace™.

    Similarly, the radicalization rhetoric about the right allows the government to ignore and marginalize its critics, delegitimize the movement, and utilize tools normally off limits against its dissenters, such as mental health screenings, denials of security clearances, additions to “no fly” lists, and removal from the financial system.

    There is a recent historical parallel of exaggerating threats when the real goal is to control beliefs. At the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, James Fields drove his car into a crowd of Antifa protesters blocking the road, killing one young woman.

    Thereafter, the Alt-Right became a damaged brand, inseparable from Fields’ violent action that day; while the violent actions of Antifa—attacking rally participants and blocking the roads in large, agitated crowds—were forgotten.

    President Trump’s nuanced and fair comment on the rally that there were “good people on both sides” was repeatedly described inaccurately as apologizing for political violence and white supremacy.

    This conflation of extreme thoughts and violence also works in reverse. The supposedly noble cause of BLM renders all of the extensive violence done in its name forgivable. This is why the media described a summer of riots as “mostly peaceful protests,” and the FBI director dismissed Antifa as “an idea, not an organization.”

    For the ruling elite, Antifa, while violent, is not really extreme. While both are objectively revolutionary, there is little daylight between Antifa’s message and that of officialdom and corporate America.

    Unable to refute critics, the system deems the right as infected with “radicalization.” That is, the ruling elite ignores the content of the right’s beliefs other than as evidence of psychopathology.

    It’s not just a problem to be solved or mitigated, but a disease, and one with a cure.

    There is a long history of psychoanalyzing and pathologizing political opponents. Frankfurt School psychologist Theodor Adorno, in his work The Authoritarian Personality, saw a fascist behind every healthy, happy, well-adjusted family.

    His work amalgamated all kinds of Freudian nonsense to label the average American’s respect for parents or the law as a proto-fascist sickness.

    More recently, the Soviet Union’s coercive psychology was a prominent tool of social control. While Stalin used brute force and imprisonment, after his death and the regime’s “thaw,” coercive psychology became a common means of abusing political dissidents, under the rubric of treating ersatz disorders such as “delusions of reform” and “sluggish schizophrenia.”

    As a consequence, political dissidents spent years drugged up in psychiatric hospitals, forgotten by the world, their beliefs maligned as the rantings of madmen.

    These are the same types of people the frenzied political left today labels as dangerous radicals. The potential for abuse is not difficult to imagine. While elevating the obviously dementia-ridden Biden to the presidency, the same left (and Never Trump right) ridiculously sought to declare Trump incompetent under the 25th Amendment.

    In the Soviet Union, the use of psychological diagnoses and treatment avoided publicity and the minimal requirements of Soviet law. The same advantages prevail today. Doctors are in better graces with the public than politicians or law enforcement. Labeling someone as sick gives the patina of medical science and charity to coercion.

    Treating radicalization like a disease, with an aggressive therapeutic police state as the cure, is intrinsically totalitarian.

    It classifies ordinary political expressions and beliefs held by half of the country as outside the mainstream and dangerous, failing to distinguish mere belief from unlawful activity.

    The principles of “deradicalization” permit the government, social media companies, and medical professionals to monitor private associations, discussions, and thoughts lacking any real prospect of violence.

    One can expect that every psychologist, family doctor, school counselor, and neighbor will soon be on the lookout for signs of “radicalization.”

    A wayward comment, a bumper sticker, reading the wrong kinds of books, or making the wrong kinds of jokes may unleash the full panoply of tools in the arsenals of the state and its corporate and health system allies.

    One thing we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic is that there is a large cohort of eager snitches with a deformed moral sense walking among us.

    Treating radicalization like a disease is intrinsically totalitarian and stigmatizing. It permits the government, social media, and medical professionals to monitor and judge private associations, private discussions, and private thoughts.

    These monitoring activities undermine the ability of people to politically organize in real life, fearful of “Feds” and other hostile elements.

    One can expect elements within the Republican Party to cooperate in this marginalization of the right-wing. A total of 35 Republican congressman voted to support a commission to investigate the Jan. 6 protests, an impending farce that will further solidify this episode as an example of “dangerous radicalism.”

    Perhaps realizing the totalitarian principles and trajectory of this radicalization narrative will pull some of these congressmen back from the brink.

    The ruling class has stated its intention to undertake an unprecedented assault on core American freedoms and the heritage of the American people. One must ask, who radicalized them?
    Christopher Roach is an attorney in private practice based in Florida. He has written for The Federalist, Takimag, the Orlando Sentinel, and has a regular column in American Greatness.

  47. Brother Nathanael July 5, 2021 @ 8:33 pm

    NEW Vid Coming!

    This Thursday (Lord willing…)

    STAY tuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuned. +bn

  48. benzion kook July 5, 2021 @ 11:09 pm

    Jesus was labeled a terrorist by the Pharisees, misrepresented to the Romans as a dangerous “insurrectionist.”

    They weren’t dumb enough to believe them, but went along with it anyway.

    Don’t do as the Romans did.

  49. The Englishman July 6, 2021 @ 2:18 am

    There are only two sites of religion I use in my Talmudvision free, Laptop notified world.

    The hero of the subordinate site I read, tells the news of the one ROC official, not the Church, calling it out to be a sin to REFUSE the vaxx.

    Note the insight in the hero’s last paragraph.

  50. The Englishman July 6, 2021 @ 12:03 pm

    Perhaps someone could forward some of the many “Dtube/Brand New Tube” videos of Dr. Vernon Coleman to Metropolitan Hilarion,

  51. KathJuliane July 6, 2021 @ 1:00 pm

    Biden: We’re Sending People ‘Door-to-Door, Literally Knocking on Doors’ to Check Americans for Vaccinations

    Becker News

    July 6, 2021

    President Joe Biden doubled down on White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki’s message on Tuesday that the administration intends to send people door-to-door to check people for vaccinations.

    The president came out to deliver the message himself. Watch:

    “A special focus on five ways to make gains in getting those of you who are unvaccinated vaccinated,” Biden said. “Because here’s the deal. We are continuing to wind down the mass vaccination sites that did so much in the Spring to rapidly vaccinate those eager to get their first shot, and their second shot, for that matter, if they need the second.”

    “Now, we need to go community by community, neighborhood by neighborhood, and oftentimes, door to door, literally knocking on doors, to get help to the remaining people, protected from the virus,” Biden added.

    Earlier in the day, Jen Psaki warned Americans that community organizers would be coming door to door to ask them about their most private and personal health decisions.

    “The president will outline five areas his team is focused on to get more Americans vaccinated,” Psaki said. “One, targeted community, by door-to-door outreach to get remaining Americans vaccinated by ensuring they have the information they need on how safe and accessible the vaccine is.”

    There are currently 157 million fully vaccinated Americans in the United States. There are fewer than 6,000 cases and 50 deaths per day. When combining natural immunity, vaccination rates, and considering those who are not significantly at-risk, the COVID pandemic is effectively “over.” But not for Washington policymakers who want to vastly expand its powers in a blatant act of overreach.

    The Biden administration is so concerned about COVID “variants” that it now risks sending workers to perfect strangers’ homes to harrass them about their personal decisions.

    That is an aggressive move that may wind up doing more damage to the Biden administration’s public image than it will gain with marginal increases to vaccination rates for a virus whose transmission has effectively has slowed to the point it can barely spread.

  52. KathJuliane July 7, 2021 @ 10:27 am

    Jewish FBI Agent Infiltrates Bible Study Group; Then Tries To Entrap Its Members

    National Justice

    7 July 2021

    The family of 27-year-old Fi Duong thought they escaped government oppression when they left Vietnam. They were wrong.

    According to an FBI criminal complaint, Duong has been closely surveilled by the FBI for the past six months, including while he engaged in religious activity.

    In conversations with undercover FBI agents, Duong held that he entered the Capitol on January 6th to film the events in a journalistic capacity. The man was a member of a Virginia-based Bible study group that Jewish Joint Terrorism Task Force special agent Jason Jankovitz decided to open up a domestic terror probe into.

    Agents repeatedly tried and failed to snare Duong into a Molotov cocktail plot because he owned multiple empty glass bottles. They were not able to charge him for any explosives related crimes, but the New York Times and various other outlets are reporting him as a terrorist anyway.

    Feds At Bible Study

    According to Jankovitz, Duong popped up on the FBI’s radar after an undercover Metropolitan police officer made contact with him outside the Capitol on January 6th.

    A week later, the MPD officer introduced Duong to an undercover FBI agent, who he invited to a Bible study group he attended in Alexandria, Virginia. The suspect expressed anguish over the fact that his family fled persecution in Vietnam in hopes of obtaining freedom in the United States, only to now be subjected to similar oppression in America for his patriotic beliefs.

    At the house, the FBI agents participated in discussions about the Bible and the group of friends also shot firearms together. The criminal complaint also describes plans to improve their driving skills and train together in martial arts.

    Outside of telling group members that he had entered the Capitol to film as a journalist, description of an instance where he had infiltrated an Antifa event, and discussions of Virginia peacefully seceding from the United States, there was nothing in the group that justified federal agents spying on them.

    Failed Attempts At Entrapment

    Multiple agents began isolating members and trying to talk them into behavior that could be construed as a domestic terror plot.

    Judging from the affidavit, Duong was meticulously law abiding. He discussed plans to obtain a suppressor for his rifle but only after filing the proper paper work with the ATF, for example. The complaint against Duong focuses heavily on his political criticisms of Antifa, Black Lives Matter and the Democratic Party, but does not describe any activity that could be prosecuted as criminal.

    After noticing a box of empty glass bottles in the suspect’s home, agents began pressuring him to make Molotov Cocktails.

    While creating the contraption — a glass bottle filled with gasoline and ignited with a rag to make a small fire — for entertainment value does not strike most people as a serious crime, federal prosecutors on a political mission have in the past charged making Molotov cocktails as the same thing as building an actual bomb.

    Last June, two FBI agents pressured Duong into trying to build Molotov cocktails to test them out in West Virginia. The suspect then changed his mind last minute. He told the two undercover agents that he wanted to obtain permission from the ATF to construct the explosive device before actually doing it.

    The agents soon peer pressured him into another attempt, this time at an abandoned prison in Fairfax County, which the FBI could use to dump serious charges on the man.

    He was picked up in an undercover FBI vehicle and the men engaged in “reconnaissance.” At the site, Duong was recorded telling the agents that he liked the idea, but would seek to get formal permission from the state before testing the devices near the facility.

    Ultimately, the undercover agents got frustrated and decided to charge him for trespassing at the Capitol. In spite of this, the FBI complaint features the phrase “Molotov cocktail” over 24 times, which is an attempt to paint the suspect as a dangerous criminal when he appears before a judge.

    It should be noted that an FBI criminal complaint is merely a narrative constructed by the agent authoring it, and should thus be taken with a grain of salt.

    Even as the only information available to the public at the moment, there are already serious civil rights and freedom of religion questions, including in respects to bias and hate when it comes to a federal agent of Jewish ancestry deciding to target men of the Christian faith for surveillance while they engage in fellowship and worship.

  53. KathJuliane July 7, 2021 @ 10:53 am

    Must see:

    How Boomers Were Taught to Hate (Themselves): Black-pilled analyses Norma Rae

    Occidental Observer

    July 7, 2021/by Kevin MacDonald

    Very insightful analysis of Norma Rae is by a videographer, Black-Pilled. I don’t know how to get in touch with him, but very well done.

    Also from Black-Pilled:


    The Believer

  54. KathJuliane July 7, 2021 @ 1:29 pm

    Can Mass Subjugation Save American Democracy?

    American Institute for Economic Research

    James Bovard/July 7, 2021

    “Beatings will continue until morale improves” has morphed from an old joke to the latest prescription for national salvation. “Compulsory National Service Could Unite America,” whooped a New York Times Op-ed headline last week.

    Prominent media outlets, think tanks, and too many professors and former generals are calling for government to commandeer a year of young Americans’ lives to forcibly restore their faith in the political system.

    Rep. John Delaney made a one-year mandatory service requirement for every 18-year-old a keystone of his Democratic presidential campaign.

    Last year, the congressionally-created National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service recommended reserving “mandatory service as a last resort” to force Americans to serve as politicians demand.

    From the Aspen Institute to the Brookings Institution, from the Washington Post to Politico, national service is being whooped up as a silver bullet for all that ails America.

    Congress last month created a new federal holiday, Juneteenth Day, spurred in part by focus on the horrors of slavery. But compulsory service advocates are rewriting the script for American history.

    Apparently, slavery was evil not because of the unjust subjugation but because plantation owners, not politicians, were the profiteers. If the federal government is the beneficiary of forced labor, any quibbles about the 13th Amendment’s prohibition of involuntary servitude are moot.

    Compulsory national service is the deranged civics version of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). MMT theory presumes that politicians can fabricate and spend unlimited amounts of fiat money without profoundly damaging the economy.

    Similarly, compulsory national service proponents presume politicians can destroy a vast swath of freedom without harming America. Proponents tacitly assume that the time of young people is of zero value, so their scheme costs nothing.

    Since every 18-to-20 year old is squandering all their time playing video games and watching Pornhub, why not round them up? But where did politicians acquire the right to command young people to postpone building their own lives?

    Compulsory national service would provide “attitude adjustment” for an entire generation. Many proponents stress that shackling young people is the best way to encourage them to be tolerant and appreciative of people of different backgrounds.

    Pulitzer Prize-winning author and historian Doris Kearns Goodwin favors national service because “you get people from the city to the country, country to the city, you begin to create a new generation that has shared values.”

    Indoctrination would be a huge part of any such program but the media wouldn’t use that term because progressive values would be inculcated. The vast majority of young Americans spend 12 years in government schools but politicians want more control over their thoughts.

    A recent New York Times editorial on the virtues of mandatory service quoted philosopher William James on how such a scheme could encourage “obedience to command.”

    A Time magazine article touting national service approvingly quoted a retired Air Force veteran: “There isn’t an 18-year-old boy who doesn’t need to get his butt kicked by someone in a position of complete authority.” Do young Americans need to be forcibly taught to recite, “Thank you, Master?”

    Compulsory national service could provide politicians with an army to enforce their commands across the nation.

    After 9/11, the Bush administration created the USA Freedom Corps – a White House agency to oversee all federal service programs. The Freedom Corps quickly became assigned to recruiting informants for Operation TIPS – the Terrorist Information and Prevention System.

    TIPS aimed to sign up millions of spies—from truck drivers to letter carriers to cable television installers—who would report any “out of the ordinary” behavior to the feds.

    No clear guidelines were ever issued on what could be considered “suspicious” and worth adding to someone’s federal dossier. The program was widely denounced as a federal snitch system and Congress quickly torpedoed it.

    Idealizing national service requires ignoring a long record of federal failures. The largest employment program of the 1930s, the Work Progress Administration, gave leaf-raking a bad name and was widely derided as “We Poke Along.”

    Contemporary economists recognize that FDR’s vast interventionist schemes perpetuated the Great Depression.

    Federal programs are far more likely to blight young people than to turn them into productive Americans. In the 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson launched summer jobs programs that promised to teach good work habits to urban youth.

    Federal auditors warned in 1969 that many teens in federal summer jobs programs “regressed in their conception of what should reasonably be required in return for wages paid.”

    Vice President Walter Mondale’s Task Force on Youth Unemployment reported in 1980 that “private employment experience is deemed far more attractive to prospective employers than public work” because of the poor habits youth learned on government payrolls.

    The Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) offers other warnings of the perils of vastly expanding the federal payroll. During the Carter administration, CETA ballooned to provide jobs and training for more than 7 million people.

    To boost political bragging rights, the feds pressured local governments and nonprofits to maximize the number of CETA hires, turning it into a make-work laughingstock.

    CETA paid to build an artificial rock for rock climbers to play on, paid “artists” to grope each other’s naked bodies to recognize “male and female characteristics,” and conducted door-to-door food stamp recruiting campaigns.

    CETA was also a dismal failure for trainees. A Labor Department study revealed that CETA recruits had “significantly lower post-program earnings” than similar individuals who never enrolled in CETA.

    AmeriCorps is often touted as the model for what a vast national service could become. But unless photo opportunities for politicians are presumed to be of infinite value, AmeriCorps remains the same hopeless boondoggle it was when President Clinton launched it in 1994.

    Despite its unctuous motto, “Be the Greater Good,” AmeriCorps has always been desperate to justify its existence, leading it to divert recruits into political rabble-rousing, endless puppet shows for recycling, dawdling as elementary school playground monitors, and “teaching condom negotiation skills.”

    Though an AmeriCorps honcho boasted that its members had “committed a billion hours of service,” the Government Accountability Office thumped the agency for failing to “demonstrate results” and ignoring “the quality of service provided” by its members.

    The agency’s inspector general condemned it in 2014 for a “shocking waste of taxpayer funds, lax oversight… and widespread noncompliance with rules, regulations and sound contracting practices.” But the program continues to receive laudatory media coverage because it serves as a smiley face for big government.

    Pundits gush about the tasks that conscripts could do as if there was a magical pot of gold at the end of the compulsion rainbow.

    Actually, “good deed chain gangs” would likely be even more shiftless than AmeriCorps recruits. As John Stuart Mill observed in 1848, “It is a truism to assert, that labor extorted by fear of punishment is inefficient and unproductive.”

    But inefficiency is irrelevant to national redemption, right? A New York Times Op-ed rhapsodized, “Many aging Vietnam-era veterans attest to the sense of community that came with… involuntary military service.”

    Regrettably, the writer – Rutgers University president Jonathan Holloway – was not able to survey the 58,000 Americans who died in that war to gauge their opinions on the benefits of involuntary military service.

    Last month was the 50th anniversary of the Pentagon Papers, which exposed how politicians perennially betrayed young Americans by sending them to die on false pretenses.

    [Not to mention the wounded and disabled Viet Nam Vets, most of whom were conscripts, that is, drafted, serving under these same false pretences. 304,000 were wounded out of 2.7 million who served, with 75,000 permanently disabled. – Kj]

    But Washington’s “best and brightest” learned nothing from that damning expose.

    One of the most prominent advocates of national service is Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who was the U.S. military commander who helped persuade President Obama to send an additional 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan (where more than a thousand of them pointlessly died).

    An investigation by Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that it was “common at military headquarters in Kabul — and at the White House — to distort statistics to make it appear the United States was winning the war when that was not the case.”

    In 2019, SIGAR chief John Sopko summarized the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan: “The American people have constantly been lied to.”

    [Nothing new. Distorted government and military statistics during the Viet Nam War was elevated to an art form and new heights of lies and deceptions. – Kj]

    If military and political leaders didn’t hesitate to lie to the hilt about their wars, why would anyone expect them to be candid about the costs and benefits of mass subjugation?

    There is no reason to expect any national service scheme to be more honest than the Vietnam War, the Iraq War, the Afghan war, or the typical floor debate in the U.S. Senate.

    The compulsory service prescription for unity ignores how politicians are to blame for much of the current national strife.

    Historian Henry Adams observed a century ago that politics “has always been the systematic organization of hatreds.” The bipartisan vitriol pervading Washington is a reminder that only damn fools expect uplift from politicians.

    One of the clearest lessons from the compulsory service crusade is that much of the nation’s elite media and opinion makers utterly disdain individual liberty.

    Since freedom for average Americans has zero value in itself, pundits and poohbahs have zero concern about politicians destroying it. Rather than becoming patriotic, conscripts would likely be embittered to realize that politicians wasted a swath of their lives in which they could have developed their minds and talents to make themselves self-sufficient citizens.

    We should not turn young people into cannon fodder for good deeds that exist only in White House press releases. At a time when the media endlessly denounces inequality, remember that the greatest and most dangerous inequality is that between haughty government officials and citizens stripped of their constitutional rights.

    Peaceful co-existence between all citizens is the recipe for an American revival, not a vast increase in subjugation to indoctrinate the latest Woke Catechism of the Week.

  55. KathJuliane July 7, 2021 @ 1:40 pm

    Capitol Police Opening California, Florida, Offices to Expand Member Protection

    The United States Capitol Police are opening regional offices in California and Florida to better protect members in the wake of the Jan. 6 riot in Washington, D.C., the agency announced Tuesday.


    “The USCP has enhanced our staffing within our Dignitary Protection Division as well as coordinated for enhanced security for members of Congress outside of the National Capitol Region,” Acting USCP Chief Yogananda Pittman said in a press release from the agency Tuesday.

    “The department is also in the process of opening Regional Field Offices in California and Florida with additional regions in the near future to investigate threats to members of Congress.”

    The move is one of several steps the agency is implementing following the riot at the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6 where several hundred people stormed the building as a joint session of Congress was officially tallying Electoral College votes from the 2020 presidential election.

    “Throughout the last six months, the United States Capitol Police has been working around the clock with our Congressional stakeholders to support our officers, enhance security around the Capitol Complex, and pivot towards an intelligence-based protective agency,” Pittman said in the release.

    The agency dates to 1800 when the nation’s capital moved from Philadelphia to Washington, D.C., formally founding the organization in 1828 with a mission to protect members of the legislature and the federal building, according to the organization.

    In addition to the new offices, the agency is expanding wellness services, bringing in organizations that specialize in psychological trauma and stress as it develops its own in-house peer support teams, increased training with the National Guard to deal with civil disturbances and increasing its use of force, tactical, equipment, leadership, and incident command.

    Other areas the organization plan to address include communications, recruitment, and its equipment and technology.

    “Those are just some of the improvements the United States Capitol Police is making, with the support of our Congressional stakeholders, in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack,” Pittman said.


    Food for thought – Expansion of the US Capitol Police is evidence of the first truly national secret police force and intelligence bureau, owned and operated solely by “Congressional stakeholders” and not answerable in any form to We The People — consciously so.

    No will its branch offices in the home states of Congress members be subject to those states’ jurisdictions.

    US Capitol Police national police force will be outside of the federal system as the US Capitol Police are part of the Legislative Branch, not the Executive, directly answerable only to the House of Representatives and the Senate, and ultimately in the chain-of-command the Speaker of the House as the “mayor” of Capitol Hill.

    “The United States Capitol Police (USCP) is overseen by the Capitol Police Board and has Congressional oversight by appropriations and authorizing committees from the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.

    “This oversight affords the Department the support and opportunity to continually ensure that the USCP meets the safety and security needs of the Congress, the staff, and the many visitors who come to the United States Capitol each day.”

    Capitol Police Board – The Sergeants at Arms of the House and Senate are elected to their positions by the members of the respective congressional chambers.

    >Karen H. Gibson, United States Senate Sergeant at Arms (Chair)
    >William J. Walker, U.S. House of Representatives Sergeant at Arms (Member)
    >J. Brett Blanton, Architect of the Capitol (Member)
    >Yogananda D. Pittman, Acting Chief of Police (Ex-Officio Member)

    USCP is also re-imagining and planning expansion of its role as much more of an intelligence agency instead of a law enforcement agency in the name of dignitary protection.

    The Capitol Police Board manages the day to day operations of USCP, but is entirely beholden only to congressional oversight and appropriations committees and very political and partisan committee chairs that fund, appoint, and nominally supervise them, and subject to the vagaries of internal Capitol Hill politics.

    Congressional Committees

    >Appropriations Committees
    House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Legislative Branch

    Chairman: Tim Ryan (Ohio)
    Ranking Member: Jaime Herrera Beutler (Washington)

    >Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Legislative Branch

    Chairman: Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
    Ranking Member: Mike Braun (Indiana)

    >Authorizing Committees
    Committee on House Administration

    Chairperson: Zoe Lofgren (California)
    Ranking Member: Rodney Davis (Illinois)

    >Senate Committee on Rules and Administration

    Chairwoman: Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota)
    Ranking Member: Roy Blunt (Missouri)

    It’s Democratic Socialist Pelosi’s dream come true for her progressive uniparty rule in the temple of Our Democracy™.

    “Congressional stakeholders” are now building the framework for their own national secret police force with offices in every state capital, a Stasi, which as a part of the Legislative Branch is not subject to federal law, rules and regulations that federal agencies are. Nor are they subject to FOIA being an organ of the legislature, which itself is exempt from FOIA, as trying to obtain the name and identity of Ashli Babbit’s executioner proves to be impossible.

    And somewhere along the line, my gut feeling is this will somehow tie into the grand plans of a national conscription program as well.

    The national USCP force, already notoriously liberal and woke, through its appointments and hires will be filled according to partisan ideology and indoctrination, and follow the politics of it Congressional stakeholders and House paymasters.

  56. benzion kook July 7, 2021 @ 10:19 pm


    “Invade every little country in the world that doesn’t have H-bombs.” – the ‘woke’ George Washington.

  57. farouk abdulghani July 8, 2021 @ 5:10 am

    As a black person and a Muslim, from a religious standpoint this is in the Quran 5:82

    “You will surely find the most bitter towards the believers to be the Jews and Polytheists and the most friendly to be those who call themselves Christian. That is because there are priests and monks among them and because they are not arrogant.” So we have no problem with white people or Christians.

    From a political stand point they are trying to disfranchise the largest political block and turn the US into a de-facto anti-white anti-Christian apartheid state.

    It also separates black by race where they 12% minority instead of Christians where they are part of an 80% majority

  58. KathJuliane July 8, 2021 @ 1:59 pm

    The Sodomites try to pass this off as parody, satirizing and poking fun the very real and legitimate fears of parents and families as being groundless.

    It’s not. In their long-term goals for the Queering of America, they are coming for your kids.

    Despite the big deal about sodomite “marriage” and noise about raising a family in a queer household, only a small percentage of LGBTQ+ actually ever commit to a permanent relationship, much less having and raising children, naturally or through adoption.

    In other words, sodomites, many of whom are narcissistic sociopaths, don’t naturally reproduce nor are they interested in something approximating a “normal” family life and raising kids, despite all their screaming about “equality”.

    They are notoriously promiscuous even in “committed” relationships, scoring upwards of thousands of sexual partners and one-night stands.

    The majority of sodomite relationships are very unstable, with at least one partner routinely unfaithful to the relationship, but quite often the relationship is simply “open” without any idea of fidelity to the relationship.

    The only way to increase their numbers is “converting” children, grooming and recruiting them into the queer lifestyle, and that only for lust and sexual addiction.

    In no way does the San Francisco Gay Chorus merely sing a parody satirizing concerned parents, not with the very aggressive gender indoctrination of kids in the classroom, and the years that ‘queer creators’ have spent pushing the LGBTQ+ on television and social media.

    Even if they sing it in a comedic fashion calculated to be perceived as jest, don’t be fooled.

    Not the Bee first reported the story.

    One person wrote in the YouTube comment section before it was privatized:

    “The dead stare in this guy’s eyes. This is some black-pilling creepiness at the max. Keep him away from any and all kids.”


    San Fran gay choir literally sings “we’re coming for your children” in new music video

    Not the Bee

    Doc Holliday

    Jul 7th, 2021 1:09 pm

    The pinnacles of tolerance are at it again, this time with a “message” that they are literally coming for our children.

    I mean they really, actually made a song that says “we are coming for your children.”

    Try to get through this:

    [Original YT video was made unavailable, for private viewing only, after it received only 88 likes and 5,000 dislikes, according to the Postmillenial. I saw some of the YT comments before it was privatized, and they weren’t complementary – Kj]

    “We’ll convert your children – happens bit by bit, quietly and subtly and you will barely notice it… We’ll convert your children: we’ll make them tolerant and fair.”

    Ah, yes. “Tolerant” and “fair.”

    So tolerant, in fact, that anyone who disagrees with the ideology of the LGBT movement that they are doxxed, canceled, derided, and mocked. So fair, in fact, that they say God is unjust for judging those who abuse His design for sex and marriage while they condemn those who abuse their definitions.

    I guess it must be fun to fancy yourself a god!

    “We’ll convert your children – Yes we will! – reaching one and all, there’s really no escaping it, cause even grandma likes RuPaul. We’ll convert your children: someone’s gotta teach them not to hate!”

    Ah, can you sense the love that emanates from these words? There’s no hatred or bitterness here at all!

    “We’re coming for them, we’re coming for your children! We’re coming for them, we’re coming for them, WE’RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN!!!”

    Keep it up, guys! You’re doing great.

    There is nothing more unifying than telling people you are literally coming for their kids. Nothing!

    “Your children will care about fairness and justice for others! Your children will work to convert all their sisters and brothers! Then soon we’re almost certain, your kids will start converting you! The gay agenda is coming home!”

    Man, this suuuure sounds like a cult, doesn’t it?

    Here were some helpful replies to a bunch of grown dudes saying they are coming for the kids:


    2008: “We just want to marry!”
    2021: “We’re coming for your kids”


    Spider Hollow

    Then; “It’s just 2 grown adults in the privacy of their own bedroom”



    -We are normal, we just want equality
    -uhm, ok




    Great lyrics guys, very eye opening.




    Only people in the Americas think that this is event tolerable that zealots get to dictate what other people’s children should think. So much for tolerance of different cultures and accepting difference on opinions. Who thought that gay fascism actually would exist outside of memes.



    Slippery slope is no long a fallacy but an observable phenomenon.



    All i’m saying is anyone coming for my children betterhave Level IV plates.


    Not the Bee finishes with:

    “What a time to be alive.”

    Convert? Wow! That’s a religious term. Okay, at least we don’t have to play pretend anymore. Parents, what say you?

    From joke to joke, the truth appears.

    The sodomite with the dead black eyes, predatory stage smile and faggot charm is Troy Iwata. He’s a popular stage and screen actor, dancer, and singer of sodomite fame, especially on Netflix.

    When these predators tell you what they are doing, believe them.

  59. Ted Gorsline July 8, 2021 @ 2:13 pm

    @farouk abdulghani

    I once has a safari company in Tanzania. About half of my 50 employees were Muslim. I found them to be honorable and decent people. They were very honest. They helped me a lot.

    At the same time I had a nest of jews trying to keep me from getting into business by bribing civil servants to hold up my paperwork. It took me costly months to identify and neutralize them. Their idea being to bankrupt me.

    Later they tried to have me killed. Because of this I still have the imprints of their teeth, scars really, on the knuckles of both hands.

    I never enjoyed myself more than handing out punishment to six of them.

    I am sure Muslims and Christians (if they get rid of Jewish usury) can get along fine but we cannot inhabit planet earth earth with the jews.

    It simply not possible. They are treacherous beyond human understanding, heavily inbred and not very intelligent.

    They have to go and the sooner the better.

  60. B July 8, 2021 @ 2:54 pm

    Here just a 2 minute video about how the Jewish War Veterans hate the Christian Cross and have successfully made it illegal.


  61. B July 8, 2021 @ 3:42 pm

    Here is another better video about the Cross removal by the JWV.


  62. B July 9, 2021 @ 10:15 am

    The cross at Mount Soledad Veterans Cemetary is still standing and it is not coming down.

    Here is a history of what happened:

Leave a comment