Main Contents

Schiff’s Secret Sanhedrin

Brother Nathanael Channel Videos!, BroVids

Schiff’s Secret Sanhedrin
October 29 2019

Watch: ‘Censor-Free!’ HERE!

Subscribe To +BN Vids HERE!

More +BN Vids!

The Lying Eyes Of Adam Schiff Here

The Layers Of Vengeful Impeachment Here

The Tide Is Turning In America Here

+BN Classics On Brighteon!

The Mugging Of America Here

Exposing Zionist Christians Here

Why I Left Judaism Here

+BN Vids FULL Archive! HERE!
(Upload ALL My Vids On The Jew Internet!)
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Secure Donation Form

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Brother Nathanael @ October 29, 2019


  1. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:04 pm


    Schiff’s Secret Sanhedrin

    “This is your hour and the power of darkness,” said Jesus to the Jewish Sanhedrin when they apprehended Him at midnight.

    Hedged in secrecy a mock trial followed and once again innocent blood was shed by wicked Jews.

    The God-murderers still lick their chops on their devious plots.

    [Clip: “Thank you Madam Speaker, I want to give you a brief update on the investigation. In the last couple of weeks I think we’ve made dramatic progress in answering some of the questions surrounding that July telephone call between President Trump and President Zelensky in which the President of the United States sought to coerce a vulnerable ally into conducting what can best be described as a sham investigation involving his opponent.”]

    Not so, slime ball.

    You’re forcing into the call what was not there.

    Trump did not “coerce” Zelensky.

    But rather, as the Constitution grants to the Presidency the primary responsibility for foreign relations, Trump asked Zelensky—as he legally can with any foreign leader—for help with a US investigation into corruption having international dimensions.

    And when it comes to criminal conduct you can’t throw a stone at Ukraine without hitting the name “Biden.”

    [Clip: “I remember going over convincing our team, our leaders–convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. I went over, I guess the 12th, 13th time, to Kiev and I was supposed to announce that there’s another billion dollar loan guarantee. And I’d gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from, ah, Yatsenyuk, that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn’t. So they said they had–they were walking out to a press conference. I said, ‘Naw, I’m not going to, ahh, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, ‘You have no authority. You’re not the president. The President said,’ I said, ‘Call him.’ I said ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars’. I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion, and I’m going to be leaving here in,’ I think it was about six hours. I looked at ’em and said, ‘I’m leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”]

    Well, son of a bitch.

    The real bitch here is that the prosecutor Biden got fired was leading a corruption probe into the Ukrainian gas firm, “Burisma Holdings.”

    They just so happened to employ Biden’s son Hunter who knew absolutely nothing about energy when hired.

    Sounds pretty ‘quid pro quo’ to me.

    Yet not a peep out of the Jew-owned press.

    Why so silent ? Huh?

    Well, they’re part of what Trump calls the ‘Unholy Alliance’ between the Demonrats and the Mediarats.

    And as for Trump’s alleged ‘quid pro quo’ of withholding military aid, he prudently put it on hold until Zelenksky could form a new government under Ukraine’s parliamentary system.

    Trump, you see, keen to follow up on his own anti-corruption instincts, would wait until the new government was stabilized.

    And then see indications that Zelensky would spend the money for what the aid was earmarked for… …rather than it disappearing into some Ukrainian ‘Jewish oligarchy’ dark hole.

    That’s Foreign Policy 101.

    There was no ‘mafia shakedown’ that Schiff wants us to swallow.

    It’s one thing for a Jew to lie with a straight face.

    You simply do a fact check.

    But when a Jew lies to your face for two years running about ‘collusion’ to every media venue and every media-jew available (tons of them), then who’s going to believe Schiff’s latest stack of lies?

    RussiaGate didn’t work, and now we got UkraineGate.

    It’s only solidifying Trump’s support and at a rising rate.

    And with Schiff’s Secret Sanhedrin shoved down our throats, more Americans than ever are turning off the TV.

    I mean, who can brace—24/7/365—Schiff’s hideous looking face?

    Don’t get too giddy now about a looming House vote until we see what’s in their ‘Resolution.’

    A House built on sand by Demonrats simply cannot stand.

    +BN of the cuff

  2. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:05 pm

    Bookmark these links & save the pages (all links will be kept up to date):

    You can find my Videos @

    Brother Nathanael Channel


    BroVids MP4 (complete archive)




    Daily Motion



  3. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:13 pm

    This video can be watched @

  4. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:14 pm

    I’m in SERIOUS trouble

    I have been BANNED by:

    Amazon Pay
    Network For Good
    Go Fund Me
    Click & Pledge

    PLUS: 8 major donors (I’m now down to 1)

    I will have to fold if serious funding doesn’t come in.

    I could use $50,000 to breathe freely while the Jews hound me looking for ways to pinch my pocketbook.

    Please email me at bronathanael [at] [yahoo] {dot} com.

    MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    Online donations:

    Secure Donation Form @

    Bitcoin @

  5. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:14 pm

    Support Brother Nathanael!

    Online donations:

    Secure Donation Form @

    Bitcoin @

    Mail @

    Brother Nathanael Foundation
    POB 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    All Cash Donations Come In Safely.

    Special Thanks TO:
    Pearl L.
    Mr and Mrs Craig G
    Raymond B
    “Keep Up The Good Work”

    BLESSINGS to ALL! +bn

  6. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 8:14 pm

    +BN Vids COMPLETE Archive! @

    Various Vids & More Archived @

  7. KathJuliane October 29, 2019 @ 9:02 pm

    God bless you, dear +BN.

    I love this Video. Thank you for a great one that had me on the floor.

    It’s a masterpiece of sarcasm. Your editing really highlights Biden’s sleazy creepiness and the Democrats’ pompous hypocrisy.

    Trump has yet to actually overthrow a government like what Obama-Biden-Nuland did to Ukraine.

    He has not yet destroyed an entire country (God forbid) or let that country’s leader get sodomized to death with a knife live on TV as Obama did, thanks to his architects of the Humanitarian Destruction of Libya Plan — Hillary, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice–did.

    Obama lamented about Libya being his “worst mistake” a while back. No fool, listening to those Three Witches of the White House was your worst mistake.

    I have nightmares about Hillary being the first feminist war president.

    And, because some of the Kurdish tribes, like the PKK and the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Syria, are secular, Marxist-communist, and feminist, in my mind’s eye, I can see Hildebeast completely destroying all of Syria in order to establish the first Middle Eastern feminist Democratic Republic of Rohava throughout the entire of that country.

    Anyway, the Video pops! It should become a +BN instant classic.

    Off the Cuff was hilarious. “Choleric” — yep, that’s Trump.

    Trump can be the most Make Israel Great Again guy in the world, give the entire world to the Jews, secretly wanted to be a Jew for the past 30 years like Jackie Mason said, pee on the Palestinians at the Jews behest, especially his daughter and son-in-law (Kush is in Israel now schmoozing with Gantz) but that volcanic sized choleric streak in his temperament combined with his giant-sized ego would have dinosaurs charging for the hills when it blows.

    It’s like a force of Nature. Jews just can’t stand that they can’t control it.

  8. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 9:49 pm


    I’m gonna toot my own horn.

    I’m the ONLY one that points out that Trump “withheld” military aid to Ukraine UNTIL its new government was in place and stabilized under its parliamentary system.

    Even the Wall Street Journal did not point this out.

    +BN (Toot toot)

  9. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 9:50 pm

    House Democrats Released Their ‘Impeachment Resolution’ and It’s Absolute Garbage

    House Democrats released their “impeachment resolution” today, which purports to lay out fair rules involving the ongoing “impeachment inquiry.”

    The weird thing is seeing some “conservatives” run to Twitter to frame this move by Democrats as calling a Republican bluff. As you’ll see, it does nothing of the sort.

    I’m not going to go through the entire thing, as it’s eight pages long, but you can reference it in its full length here. You only need to see a few parts of it to realize that nothing has really changed and that all the same complaints being made by Republicans still exist.

    Sean Davis breaks down some of the most important parts, not the least of which is that this isn’t even an actual impeachment resolution. Instead, it references the previous investigation, which doesn’t even legally exist.

    Read More @

  10. Brother Nathanael October 29, 2019 @ 10:17 pm

    +BN Vids NOW On @

  11. KathJuliane October 30, 2019 @ 1:01 am

    Hi, +BN!

    Yes, you indeed ought to toot your own horn.

    That’s an excellent catch, and the most simple and reasonable explanation of the context behind the by now infamous phone call, particularly Trump’s use of a little common sense waiting out Ukraine’s parliamentary government-in-transition.

    It appeals to my sense of Occam’s Razor, so I did some digging into timelines.

    Parliament systems and their partisan dynamics don’t work precisely like our own bi-partisan Congress, or generally have the distinct branches of government.

    As I recall the timeline, when Zelensky was elected in April with 73% of the vote, he dissolved the Ukrainian parliament, and called for a snap election for new ministers of parliament, which was originally scheduled for October.

    The snap election decree moved the elections to July 21, I think was the date.

    Zelensky’s party, Servant of the People, won the clear majority in parliament by a wide margin, and so there was no need for his party to form a ruling coalition with other Ukrainian parties.

    Trump congratulates Zelensky for his ruling party’s win on July 25, shortly after the parliamentary elections.

    Servant of the People was running on an anti-corruption slate and wanted a clean ticket of candidates, they would not run or endorse any incumbent ministers of parliament.

    Thousands of candidates ran for parliament. Servant of the People garnered new, eager ministers from all walks of life in the elections, and not just career politicians or oligarch clan fixtures.

    Thirty days later, August 21, the ministers of parliament officially took their seats, and the Ukrainian government was back in business, so to speak, with the ruling party, Servant of the People, having relatively untainted ministers on board, at least for Ukraine’s notorious levels of government corruption.

    Another very important development occurred as well which enters into what I see clearly as Trump’s “anti-corruption instincts” as you put it.

    He was certainly aware of events in Ukraine at some level related to their anti-corruption efforts. One of those events would have been the establishment at last of The High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine in April 2019 under Poroshenko.

    The court came about to meet INF’s demands and conditions its “cash-for-reforms” tranches to Ukraine. As gleaned from Wikipedia:

    In December 2016 Minister of Justice Pavlo Petrenko announced that a relevant bill for establishing a special anti-corruption court was ready to be sent to the Ukrainian parliament, which saw the draft in December 2017.

    Parliament adopted the final version of this law on 7 June 2018, after several thousand amendments to the bill.

    The law on the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine came into force on 14 June 2018, with Porshenko signing “On the Establishment of the High Anti-Corruption Court” on 26 June 2018.

    On 11 April 2019, the court was established, President Poroshenko signed the decree appointing the judges during a official ceremony, with 38 judges appointed, who were sworn in.

    After repeated failures of one judge to secure a majority of at least 20 votes from his peers for the election for almost a month, on May 7, the judges of the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) finally elected their own Head of the HACC.

    Upon that successful election, the HACC was slated begin working on 5 September 2019, and in fact it did.

    So, I have to agree. Sometimes Trump’s word salads are hard to figure out or else need decompressing.

    However, given what was going on after Zelensky’s election, it was prudent of Trump to slow-walk the military aid to Ukraine until he had a clear signal that Zelensky and the Parliament, led by the Party of the Servant of the People, was ready to get serious about tackling Ukraine’s notorious culture of corruption.

    On September 1, Pence met with Zelensky on the sidelines in Warsaw, and reinforced Trump’s anti-corruption message.

    The seating of the new government in Parliament on August 21 ready to do the people’s business, and the opening of the High Anti-Corruption Court on September 5, would surely have been those signals.

    Sometime in very early September, shortly after the Pence-Zelensky meeting, Ukraine’s military aid was released to Ukraine without any further heartburn or fanfare.

    Zelensky has said that he didn’t even know at the time of the July 25 phone call with Trump that there’d been a hold put on the military aid.

    And yes, what with Zelensky’s election and the new government-in-transition, in which a new prosecutor of Ukraine appointed by Zelensky would also start working in September, than it is certainly not inappropriate at all for POTUS to ask a “favor” of his peer to grease the wheels between the offices of our Attorney General, and Ukraine’s Prosecutor General concerning future suspected major US-Ukraine criminal and corruption cases.

    Why would Trump be so enthusiastic and welcoming of Zelensky? Well, Poroshenko and his Obama-Clinton-Euromaidan tainted Ukrainian crew was finally gone.

    You can read about what Trump may have been thinking about in his talk with Zelensky with this obscure oldie but goodie from Politico published just before Trump’s inauguration about Clinton-supporting Kiev and Poroshenko’s hand in trying to sabotage Trump’s elections chances in 2016.

    And, for sure, Barr’s DOJ has been doing a quiet administrative probe until Barr announced that the probe into the origins of the Trump-Russia case had turned into a full-blown criminal investigation, along with whatever other unspecified related matters.

    Assigned to US Attorney John Durham of Connecticut, he has a lot of back-tracking to do all the way back to Ukraine during the Obama administration, and it looks like the Zelensky administration may be poised now to help him out.

    Did Poroshenko’s people, hand in hand with the DNC and Clinton operatives frame Manafort and fabricate evidence against him, and against the Trump Campaign?

  12. CHRIST IS NEAR October 30, 2019 @ 1:14 am

    Very nice video +BN!

    I actually really like when you give a encore at the “end” of your feature video, kinda like a sweet bonus!

    Can’t wait to see more TRUTH & HONESTY.

  13. KathJuliane October 30, 2019 @ 1:15 am

    Yes, Trump of the choleric temper can harbor grudges for years, he has the proverbial memory of an elephant.

    Pro-Clinton Poroshenko and anyone in his and Obama’s administrations and the partisan circles and clans of political operatives of each who worked against and tainted his election and his first term in office are, in Trump’s book, “bad news”.

    And now maybe there’s a Ukrainian president that Trump thinks he can work with who will at least not try to interfere in our next elections, and who would like to get to the bottom of the Burisma/Biden alleged criminal scandals as a part of his anti-corruption reforms.


    Politico: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire (01/11/2017)

    Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton. (!!!)

    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office.

    They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election.

    And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia.

    The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms.

    Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

    [“Protests” was US-orchestrated Euromaidan civil war and coup d’etat which took $5 billion and many years to accomplish, with with anti-Russian Vice President Joe Biden as point man for Obama. He fulfilled the same role he had as Senator Joe fomenting ethnic civil wars and heavily advocating the NATO bombing of Serbia in the US-anti-Serbian orchestrated breakup of Yugoslavia under Clinton. — Kj]

    In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar. [Thousands of Russian troops were already in Crimea, legally, garrisoned in the major former Soviet Crimean military bases leased long-term from Ukraine – Kj].

    Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration.

    Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee.

    The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

    A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

    In an interview this month [January 2017], Chalupa told Politico she had developed a network of sources in Kiev and Washington, including investigative journalists, government officials and private intelligence operatives.

    While her consulting work at the DNC this past election cycle centered on mobilizing ethnic communities — including Ukrainian-Americans — she said that, when Trump’s unlikely presidential campaign began surging in late 2015, she began focusing more on the research, and expanded it to include Trump’s ties to Russia, as well.

    She occasionally shared her findings with officials from the DNC and Clinton’s campaign, Chalupa said.

    In January 2016 — months before Manafort had taken any role in Trump’s campaign — Chalupa told a senior DNC official that, when it came to Trump’s campaign, “I felt there was a Russia connection,” Chalupa recalled.

    “And that, if there was, that we can expect Paul Manafort to be involved in this election,” said Chalupa, who at the time also was warning leaders in the Ukrainian-American community that Manafort was “Putin’s political brain for manipulating U.S. foreign policy and elections.”

    She said she shared her concern with Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.S., Valeriy Chaly, and one of his top aides, Oksana Shulyar, during a March 2016 meeting at the Ukrainian Embassy.

    According to someone briefed on the meeting, Chaly said that Manafort was very much on his radar, but that he wasn’t particularly concerned about the operative’s ties to Trump since he didn’t believe Trump stood much of a chance of winning the GOP nomination, let alone the presidency.

    That was not an uncommon view at the time, and, perhaps as a result, Trump’s ties to Russia — let alone Manafort’s — were not the subject of much attention.

    That all started to change just four days after Chalupa’s meeting at the embassy, when it was reported that Trump had in fact hired Manafort, suggesting that Chalupa may have been on to something.

    She quickly found herself in high demand. The day after Manafort’s hiring was revealed, she briefed the DNC’s communications staff on Manafort, Trump and their ties to Russia, according to an operative familiar with the situation.

    A former DNC staffer described the exchange as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.”

    Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

    While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them.

    “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

    Chalupa said the embassy also worked directly with reporters researching Trump, Manafort and Russia to point them in the right directions. She added, though, “they were being very protective and not speaking to the press as much as they should have.

    “I think they were being careful because their situation was that they had to be very, very careful because they could not pick sides. It’s a political issue, and they didn’t want to get involved politically because they couldn’t.”

    Shulyar vehemently denied working with reporters or with Chalupa on anything related to Trump or Manafort, explaining “we were stormed by many reporters to comment on this subject, but our clear and adamant position was not to give any comment [and] not to interfere into the campaign affairs.”

    Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 race was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin (pictured), and involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials.

    Both Shulyar and Chalupa said the purpose of their initial meeting was to organize a June reception at the embassy to promote Ukraine.

    According to the embassy’s website, the event highlighted female Ukrainian leaders, featuring speeches by Ukrainian parliamentarian Hanna Hopko, who discussed “Ukraine’s fight against the Russian aggression in Donbas,” and longtime Hillary Clinton confidante Melanne Verveer, who worked for Clinton in the State Department and was a vocal surrogate during the presidential campaign.

    Shulyar said her work with Chalupa “didn’t involve the campaign,” and she specifically stressed that “We have never worked to research and disseminate damaging information about Donald Trump and Paul Manafort.”

    But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia.

    “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev.

    “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

    In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

    Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

    Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

    Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

    Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.”

    The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

    While it’s not uncommon for outside operatives to serve as intermediaries between governments and reporters, one of the more damaging Russia-related stories for the Trump campaign — and certainly for Manafort — can be traced more directly to the Ukrainian government.

    Documents released by an independent Ukrainian government agency — and publicized by a parliamentarian — appeared to show $12.7 million in cash payments that were earmarked for Manafort by the Russia-aligned party of the deposed former president, Yanukovych.

    The New York Times, in the August story revealing the ledgers’ existence, reported that the payments earmarked for Manafort were “a focus” of an investigation by Ukrainian anti-corruption officials, while CNN reported days later that the FBI was pursuing an overlapping inquiry.

    Clinton’s campaign seized on the story to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement.

    He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”

    A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

    “I believe and understand the basis of these payments are totally against the law — we have the proof from these books,” Leshchenko said during the news conference, which attracted international media coverage.

    “If Mr. Manafort denies any allegations, I think he has to be interrogated into this case and prove his position that he was not involved in any misconduct on the territory of Ukraine,” Leshchenko added.

    Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

    According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent [“Steele dossier” – Kj], Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.”

    But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified, Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

    The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.

    At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

    “For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference.

    The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

    And, almost immediately after Trump’s stunning victory over Clinton, questions began mounting about the investigations into the ledgers — and the ledgers themselves.

    An official with the anti-corruption bureau told a Ukrainian newspaper, “Mr. Manafort does not have a role in this case.”

    And, while the anti-corruption bureau told Politico late last month that a “general investigation [is] still ongoing” of the ledger, it said Manafort is not a target of the investigation. “As he is not the Ukrainian citizen, [the anti-corruption bureau] by the law couldn’t investigate him personally,” the bureau said in a statement.

    Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged….

    Beyond any efforts to sabotage Trump, Ukrainian officials didn’t exactly extend a hand of friendship to the GOP nominee during the campaign.

    The ambassador, Chaly, penned an op-ed for The Hill, in which he chastised Trump for a confusing series of statements in which the GOP candidate at one point expressed a willingness to consider recognizing Russia’s annexation of the Ukrainian territory of Crimea as legitimate. The op-ed made some in the embassy uneasy, sources said.

    “That was like too close for comfort, even for them,” said Chalupa. “That was something that was as risky as they were going to be.”

    Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk warned on Facebook that Trump had “challenged the very values of the free world.”

    Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, piled on, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

    Avakov, in a Facebook post, lashed out at Trump for his confusing Crimea comments, calling the assessment the “diagnosis of a dangerous misfit,” according to a translated screenshot featured in one media report, though he later deleted the post. He called Trump “dangerous for Ukraine and the US” and noted that Manafort worked with Yanukovych when the former Ukrainian leader “fled to Russia through Crimea. Where would Manafort lead Trump?”

    Many Ukrainian officials and operatives and their American allies see Trump’s inauguration this month as an existential threat to the country, made worse, they admit, by the dissemination of the secret ledger, the antagonistic social media posts and the perception that the embassy meddled against — or at least shut out — Trump.

    “It’s really bad. The [Poroshenko] administration right now is trying to re-coordinate communications,” said Telizhenko, adding, “The Trump organization doesn’t want to talk to our administration at all.”

    During Nalyvaichenko’s trip to Washington last month, he detected lingering ill will toward Ukraine from some, and lack of interest from others, he recalled. “Ukraine is not on the top of the list, not even the middle,” he said.

    Poroshenko’s allies are scrambling to figure out how to build a relationship with Trump, who is known for harboring and prosecuting grudges for years.

    A delegation of Ukrainian parliamentarians allied with Poroshenko last month traveled to Washington partly to try to make inroads with the Trump transition team, but they were unable to secure a meeting, according to a Washington foreign policy operative familiar with the trip.

    And operatives in Washington and Kiev say that after the election, Poroshenko met in Kiev with top executives from the Washington lobbying firm BGR — including Ed Rogers and Lester Munson — about how to navigate the Trump regime.

    Weeks later, BGR reported to the Department of Justice that the government of Ukraine would pay the firm $50,000 a month to “provide strategic public relations and government affairs counsel,” including “outreach to U.S. government officials, non-government organizations, members of the media and other individuals.”

    Firm spokesman Jeffrey Birnbaum suggested that “pro-Putin oligarchs” were already trying to sow doubts about BGR’s work with Poroshenko. While the firm maintains close relationships with GOP congressional leaders, several of its principals were dismissive or sharply critical of Trump during the GOP primary, which could limit their effectiveness lobbying the new administration.

    The Poroshenko regime’s standing with Trump is considered so dire that the president’s allies after the election actually reached out to make amends with — and even seek assistance from — Manafort, according to two operatives familiar with Ukraine’s efforts to make inroads with Trump.

    Full lengthy expose:

    Durham and his counterpart in Ukraine, who has at his disposal a complete newly established and functioning national anti-corruption investigative bureau and court devoted solely to that purpose, have a lot of ground to cover between DC and Kiev.

  14. Kalin October 30, 2019 @ 8:17 am

    Love the vid, Brother Nate.

    It’s the only way us ‘no television’ folks get the real goods. I totally agree with you. Jews don’t have enough on Trump to predict his obedience. They prefer homosexuals and pedophiles.

    These Jews are generating hate like a wild fire. One day the wind will pick up and blow the fire back over them.

    It’s becoming easier and easier to appreciate the justification for their grueling fate at the end of the last age.

    As this age draws near its end, we see the same evil snakes in the same position as they were in the last. It appears they’re creating another grueling fate for themselves.

    I can’t imagine a place on earth with a griimmer future than Israel.

  15. Maurice October 30, 2019 @ 9:32 am

    Br Nathanael,

    With your background in Judaism and being jew-wise maybe you have some insight on this question –

    Are Synagogues, Judaism, the Sanhedrin, the infrastructure through which the children of the devil organize, plan, communicate, instruct, direct, and rule?

    Have you answered this question in previous articles? If so, which article(s)? If not, please consider doing an article that answers this question.

  16. van helsing October 30, 2019 @ 12:01 pm

    It’s all unraveling now for (((deepstata))) as we knew it would.

    It always does, history repeats and repeats.

    This article did not even delve into Schiff’s reported involvement as a pedofile, Liddle Kidz foundation, and Standard Hotel atrocities.

  17. KathJuliane October 30, 2019 @ 12:05 pm

    Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

    “The United States of America and Ukraine,

    Desiring to improve the effectiveness of the competent authorities of both countriesin the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of crime through cooperation andmutual legal assistance in criminal matters,

    Have agreed as follows: …”

    In the late 1990s after the breakup of the Soviet Union, Bill Clinton negotiated a treaty with Ukraine. Basically, it’s the Ukraine and U.S. Treaty on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters.

    It was ratified by the United States Senate in October of 2000.

    Clinton signed it into law.

    The purpose of the treaty was to counter criminal activity more effectively. The treaty was designed to assist the prosecution of a wide variety of crimes on the international level.

    It entered into force on February 7, 2001

    Trump requesting legal assistance from the President of Ukraine for an investigation into a US citizen regarding corruption allegations is well within treaty and diplomatic norms.

    Essentially these treaty obligations with both the Ukraine and Australia that Trump brought up back in April call for mutual cooperation between the United States and its foreign counterparts for the purpose of providing effective legal assistance to each other.

    Simply put, it’s a treaty that legally allows U.S. authorities, of which POTUS is certainly one as head of the Executive branch, to ask for help from Ukrainian government officials on criminal investigations into American citizens, including Joe and Hunter Biden.

    Joe and Hunter are private U.S. citizens, just like the rest of us.

    Trump did nothing illegal or wrong. He was well within the parameters of the treaty, which is completely separate from the diplomatic track, and he used the prerogatives of the Office of POTUS, to request Ukraine’s assistance on what was at that time a DOJ administrative inquiry into possible crimes involved in the 2016 election — that is, fact finding enough to warrant enough ‘probable cause’ to turn the inquiry into a full official criminal investigation, as AG Barr has now done.

  18. Laskarina October 30, 2019 @ 12:40 pm

    The Jews hate Trump not only because he’s unpredictable, but because he has succeeded where they cannot by fooling most people into thinking he is not Jewish and he passes for gentile. They are envious and jealous.

    Trump comes from a long line of Jewish pimps, drug dealers, and crooks. All his wives are Jewish. His kids are Jewish and married to Jews.

    Both his parents died in a Jewish nursing home in NYC, and are buried in a Jewish cemetery. His brother publicly acknowledged that the family is Jewish and belong to a Jewish only fraternity in college (he is now deceased).

    Trump’s mentor was Roy Cohn, the homosexual Jew who pimped children to the CIA for blackmail purposes. No one makes bank in NYC real estate who is not a Jew, or beholden to the international Jew mafia.

    The pretend hatred of Trump is to distract from all this. Trump gave them Jerusalem. Trump gave them the illegally occupied Golan. Trump is sending more troops to Syria to guard the oil he has stolen for the Jews. He looks the other way while Al-Sisi in Egypt bombs his own people in the Sinai. ETC.!

    NO president of the US has done more for the Jews than Trump. Remember, it is Sheldon Adelson, the Vegas Jew trillionaire, who put Trump in power, not the American people.

    Trump is good buddies with the international Jewish mafia human traffickers. Trump has hidden his company called “Trump International Escorts” which featured underage eastern European gentile girls.

    The world of Jew criminals is not monolithic. The Chabad faction wants everything. Some “secular” Jews are not on board with that.

    Because of Trump, we have Chabad Lubavitchers–the most insanely evil entities on earth, in the White House in the form of his daughter (who initially was not Jewish enough for them so she had to take a six month indoctrination) and her androgynous soprano voiced “husband” Jared Kushner.

    Kushner travels to Saudi Arabia and makes sure they get what they need to destroy Yemen and that they and the Gulf States have their weather altering technology.

    Did anyone vote for Kushner? Even a lot of Jews hate Chabad. Chabad has real power–not just Rupert Murdoch, but the richest oligarch Lev Leviev, the diamond king, who owns half the countries in Africa.

    The real Sanhedrin re-convened in 2004. Their chief rabbi (the modern Caiaphas) brags that they have completed plans for the “third” temple. He says that they have a special crane to erect in THREE days and that the subterranean levels are already complete.

    As Saint Paisios said, when yo see the Dome of the Rock destroyed you will know it is at hand.

    Many thanks to, and prayers for, Brother Nathanael, who warns about the perfidy of the Jews, by telling the truth about them.

  19. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 1:03 pm


    Chabad, that is, the Lubavitcher sect of Hasidic jews, is one small, VERY SMALL, layer in the huge weave and hoof of Jewish power.

    I spent two years with the Chabad House group when my Jewish mother sent me to them to try to convert me back to Judaism when I accepted Jesus Christ at 21 years of age.

    They failed.

    I know these people backward and forward having attended their Shabbatons, their synagogue (kabbala) services, private dinners, and their lectures and meetings.

    Chabad has mucho money at their disposal but they only use it for their internal needs, assistance with Chabad families, etc, and to buy off local politcians when needed for their own internal interests as in the recent Vaccine case in NYC when they refused to administer it to their children and all fines and charges were suddenly dropped.

    Now, Chabad is back in the news with ‘truthers’ as some big ‘threat’ to Christianity because little ego boy Adam Green made a video on it and their Noahide laws.

    The kid is a bit late as I did an Article on this eleven years ago. Be that as it is, let it be known to all ‘truthers’ that Chabad House and their Noahide laws is NOT a threat at all.

    Adam Green can dabble in Jewish affairs like Chabad but he can only wade in Jewish waters tiptoe deep. He, being a goy who’s trying to be an expert on Jewish influence, hasn’t a clue about jews that goes any further than a Readers Digest version of Sherlock Holmes.

    The REAL threat to Christianity and its worldview and cultural/social positive influence is that Americans have ABANDONED Christ.

    This is why I regularly go out the Street doing Street Evangelism (I have sponsors for this specifically and can no longer publicise my travels due to safety issues.)

    Last week I was in DC. An FBI high official came up to me and said over and over to me, “You are an inspiration! You must continue doing this and not stop. This is what America needs!”

    In closing regarding Chabad, again, their influence is marginal at best.

    The power of Jewry begins with its lock on international finance. The money power (the love of, and Jewish use of, being the ROOT of all evils in society) is what needs to be broken, NOT Adam Green’s ‘scarecrow’ called ‘Chabad.’

    For even within the Money Power of International Jewish Finance there are many layers to search through. I’ve done this and will continue to do this for it’s the venom of jew power, of which, Adam Green has not the mind to comprehend.

    Why is Adam Green still on YouTube and +Brother Nathanael is not? Answer that question and you know that Green is blowing smoke.

    PS There’s not a Jewish bone in Trump’s body. NO Jewish blood to be found anywhere in his lineage. I only report on and state supportable assertions.

    I recall the Jewish comedian Jackie Mason once saying, “Trump is not Jewish but he might as well be. Once he tried to build in Manhattan he knew he better be Jewish.”

    See My Vids:

    Why Don’t The Rabbis Believe In Jesus? @

    Why Judaism Is Bankrupt @

    Satan At The Wailing Wall @

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Former Jew NOW Orthodox Christian @

  20. Citizenfitz October 30, 2019 @ 1:35 pm

    One has marvel at how the dam withstands the rising weight of so much sin.

    But the dam has to burst. “The end will come like a flood….” As Elder Paisios, who saw the signs, would agree: it’ll be worse than bad.

    Prayer and fasting, friends.

  21. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 2:09 pm


    This is the power of the jews NOT Chabad:

    International JEWISH Finance.

    (Adam Green could not come close to deciphering the International Jew)

    *U.S.,* Gulf Nations *Sanction* Iranian Financial Network in Joint Action
    Wall Street Journal
    October 30 2019

    RIYADH, Saudi Arabia—Saudi Arabia, Qatar and five other Gulf nations joined the U.S. in imposing sanctions on a financing network controlled by Iran’s military and several men linked to the Tehran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah.

    Top U.S. Treasury Department officials said the action is the largest ever by the Riyadh-based Terrorist Financing Targeting Center, whose membership also includes the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain and Kuwait.

    The action is viewed by U.S. officials as a strategically important regional collaboration in the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign effort against Iran, as well as a milestone in regional governments cracking down on local terror networks.

    The move is likely to also reassure Israel after President Trump’s decision to pull U.S. troops out of northern Syria rattled the close U.S. ally over concerns that the pullback was a gain for Iran.

    “The TFTC’s coordinated disruption of the financial networks used by the Iranian regime to fund terrorism is a powerful demonstration of Gulf unity,” said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, on the second leg of a Middle East tour focused on terror finance and Iran sanctions.

    The Trump administration has sent the Iranian economy into a nosedive as it tries to strong-arm Supreme Leader Ali Khomeini into signing a new nuclear and security deal through a steadily escalating campaign of sanctions.

    Still, analysts say, financing and banned trade continues to flow through the region, keeping the regime financially and politically afloat.

    Iran has retaliated by hitting oil supplies critical to the global economy in Saudi Arabia and the adjacent Strait of Hormuz.

    Mr. Mnuchin said Monday in Israel that more sanctions against Iran were coming, citing new intelligence provided by its ally.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, standing next to the secretary, said his government had evidence that Iran was seeking to develop precision-guided missiles to deploy as close as Lebanon and as far away as Yemen.

    Specifically on Wednesday, the six Gulf nations blacklisted a multibillion-dollar network of Iranian companies, banks and funds sanctioned by the U.S. last year for allegedly financing the clerical regime’s paramilitary unit called the Basij.

    Human rights groups say the unit enforces political oppression through beatings and training child soldiers sent to fight as Iranian proxies in regional conflicts.

    Basij troops are largely directed by the regime through Iran’s elite military unit and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a U.S.-designated terror group.

    “The Gulf is calling the Iranians out on this,” Marshall Billingslea, the Treasury’s assistant secretary for terrorist financing, said amid meetings with Saudi officials Thursday.

    The Gulf countries also targeted four men linked to Hezbollah, which the U.S. and many Iran-watchers say is a key tool of Tehran’s foreign policy abroad, funded and directed by the regime.

    The U.S. says the four lead the group’s operational, intelligence and financial activities in Iraq.

    Mr. Billingslea said the action by the TFTC member states “is crucial because some of these targets have tendrils that extend into the Gulf.”

    One of the groups targeted by the TFTC is Bank Mellat, an institution accused by the U.S. of having annually provided hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of dividends, interest-free loans and other financial support to the Basij through its business ties to companies owned by the unit. The TFTC designation will require member states to shut the bank’s local offices.

    Iran’s mission to the United Nations didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Saudi Arabia’s participation in Wednesday’s action is unsurprising given that its chief foe is Iran and its proxies.

    But other members of the Gulf antiterror group, most notably Qatar, have close political, social and financial ties to Tehran, spurring a measure of skepticism among some U.S. terror analysts who questioned whether the group could deliver in practice what it promised on paper.

    Senior U.S. Treasury officials said, however, that they have seen each of the countries take decisive action to dismantle terror financing networks in their countries, including currency-exchange houses and shell companies used by the Iranians to hide sanctioned transactions.

    “All the countries have made a leadership-level commitment to combat terrorist financing,” Mr. Mnuchin said in an interview. “Whenever we’ve seen something going on and we have approached them, they have given us their full commitment to address it.”

    Other signs of collaboration, U.S. officials say, include Qatar now maintaining representatives at the Riyadh-based TFTC facilities, member states enacting new laws to enforce the sanctions and progress in implementing anti-money-laundering regulations in line with recommendations made by the global watchdog group Financial Action Task Force.

    Doha has also hired former Western sanctions officials to help ensure it is implementing new terror-finance and money-laundering regulations in line with global standards.

    Still, doubts persist, fueled as influential elements within many of the countries pushed back against efforts taken by their governments, local law enforcement and prosecutors.

    A top al Qaeda financier recently won a lower-level court case in Qatar that threatens to undermine the safeguards put in place to keep him from funding further attacks.

    In the U.A.E., the emirate of Abu Dhabi is viewed by U.S. officials and analysts as a much better enforcer than Dubai, an emirate that has a large Iranian population and through which hard-to-track bulk cash transits from all corners of the globe.

    But it is in those areas that Western allies still see significant security vulnerabilities that Mr. Mnuchin plans to press top government officials to address this week.

  22. Stephen Smith October 30, 2019 @ 4:18 pm

    10-4 on Adam Green, Chabad, and the Noahide Laws, +BN.

    Thanks for the feedback.

  23. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 4:26 pm

    @Stephen Smith

    Chabad’s influence in the political and cultural realm is marginal at best.

    They do though have mucho money via their involvement in the diamond cutting business.

    I’ve been to the Diamond District in NYC many times and it’s back to back Chasid.

    But their money is used for their own greater sect family, and their own social/political interests such as preventing any fines or charges when refusing to have their children vaccinated. Apparently, some Hymie Town official got paid off

    They intensely are inclined AWAY from the public eye and political issues since so many of them are “rabbis” and their income is not taxable. Lots of hidden income there. They wish to keep a very low profile and just deal with their own closed sect interests.

    Again, I spent two years in intimate interplay with Chabad and know more about them than Adam Green could ever dream of knowing.


  24. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 9:10 pm

    The Sham Resolution @

  25. Craig A Johnston October 30, 2019 @ 9:47 pm

    Good day to you Nathanael.

    I have a subscription to the Trumpet magazine throught the Philadelphia Church of God. They offer books to further explain what they’ve mentioned.

    I got this book called Britain and the United States in Prophecy. Thing is that this guy says that goii only means a nation or a nation of people, and not as you stated the false Jews use the word for; lesser beings.

    Please help me clear this up.

    I have my scepticism about the PCOG because they support Israel and Revelations 2:9 clearly states what Jesus said about the anti-Christians.

    In addition I recall God mentioning to his people that ‘there is no more physical Israel, only a spiritual one.’

    thanks for your time,

    love the info.

  26. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 10:00 pm

    @Craig A Johnston

    “Goyim” literally means in Hebrew of the Old Testament, “nations.”

    But Jews use the word disparagingly of Gentiles.

    For instance, growing up Jewish if I ever said something stupid my Jewish teachers at synagogue would lurch at me saying I have a “goyisha kup,” that is a brain that thinks like a Gentile.

    As for a physical Israel vs a Spiritual Israel, the promises of a land to the Jews was always conditional based on their faithfulness to God and His promised Messiah.

    Upon crucifying the Lord Jesus Christ the Jews forfeited their right to the land and were scattered abroad with their Temple destroyed and Levitical priesthood lost forever.

    Christ warned of this when He scolded the Jews for their rejection and coming murder of Him, “Your house is left unto you desolate.”

    “The Israel of God,” as St Paul calls the Church, is today made up of Jews and Gentiles who become “Christians,” that is “Messianists.”

    We don’t lose our ethnic distinctions though we are individually “new creations in Christ.”

    See My Vids:

    The Four Curses On Judaism @

    Who Is The True Israel @


  27. Brother Nathanael October 30, 2019 @ 10:07 pm

    Support Brother Nathanael!

    Online donations:

    Secure Donation Form @

    Bitcoin @

    Mail @

    Brother Nathanael Foundation
    POB 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    All Cash Donations Come In Safely.

  28. man of god October 30, 2019 @ 11:13 pm

    P. Spector is the epitome of the Jewish male – a murderous, perverted, fraudulent monster.

  29. Cornelius October 31, 2019 @ 3:20 am

    Worldwide Jewish financial power can be broken, by either taking the right away from Jewish banks to print money, or to give the same right to all the (non Jewish) banks.

    Either solution will create competition of money, between national and private money, where the most reliable money will be preferred by its users.

    Today’s Jew money is used as an instrument of theft and relies heavily on the suppression of the gold price, which is the so called canary in the coal mine.

    Economic sanctions (stealing a countries dollar accounts) have the opposite effect by chasing countries away from the dollar to alternative, real money. The dollar is convenience, but very risky.

  30. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 9:33 am

    Epoch Times: Tom Brokaw Suggests Democrats Don’t Have ‘the Goods’ to Impeach Trump

    Longtime NBC anchor Tom Brokaw said that, unlike the impeachment effort of President Richard Nixon, Democrats lack “the goods” on President Donald Trump.

    Brokaw was speaking while promoting his new book, “The Fall of Richard Nixon.”

    “The big difference is … if they still don’t have what you would call ‘the goods’ on this president in terms of breaking the law and being an impeachable target for them,” Brokaw said during an appearance on MSNBC this week, “they’re going to start the process but they don’t have the same kind of clarity that the people who were opposed to Richard Nixon had because it was so clear that these were criminal acts he was involved in.”

    Host Andrea Mitchell noted that the tapes from the Oval Office helped bring Nixon down.

    “There are no more taping systems in the Oval Office,” Brokaw said.

    “That we know of,” Mitchell said. Brokaw agreed.

    House Democrats have for weeks been conducting an impeachment inquiry, trying to establish grounds for impeaching Trump.


  31. KC October 31, 2019 @ 11:31 am

    Zelensky is a Jew backed by the ultimate Jew Kolomoyski.

    If anyone needs to see and learn what the ultimate Jew is like, look no further than Kolomoyski.

    It’s almost a walking parody on itself.

  32. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 12:21 pm

    “How much closer does this all have to get to Brennan before he pops the cyanide capsule in his Spy ring?” — Steved313 – RCI commentor

    Nice work Sperry did connecting the dots to report the possible hearsay gossip-blower, who was collecting his information from the Russian-hawk Ukrainists carried over from the Obama admin, such as the likes Alexander Vindman and his twin brother, both on the National Security Council.

    A little clue as to the Jew-media/Democrat orchestration of this political kabuki — Vindman, Ukrainian-born Jew and Soviet Jewish family refugee, shows up in his dress blues and military ribbons to blind us with his dazzling patriotism, when in fact as a military officer assigned to a civilian body like the National Security Council, he wore civilian clothes every day to work, doubtless a suit and tie.

    In a photo that includes Alexander Vindman, top Ukrainian advisor on the NSC, posing in a group photo as part of an official US delegation for President Zelensky’s inauguration, a high state diplomatic event, Vindman is in a civilian suit. His brother, Yevgeny, is also an active lt. colonel in the Army, and, as a JAG officer, is also assigned to the NSC as a lawyer.

    Moreover, Jew-media was suddenly very concerned about making sure that Vindman’s one Iraq wounded-in-action award (Purple Heart) back in the 2000s when he was in Army infantry, now a career remf since about 2009, is a “war-hero” and that everyone be sure to address him by his military rank of “lt. colonel”.

    I’ll venture to make a wild guess that perhaps Vindman was wounded serving as an Army interpreter & liason for contingents of Ukrainian national troops, who were a part the early US-lead multinational force that invaded and occupied Iraq.

    He’s also kind of a patriotic military poster boy for Democrat Jews, too. About 80% of Jews are registered Democrats.

    Perfect. Touch not Vindman, or else you are unpatriotic, hate the military, and an anti-Semite as well.

    Fact remains, Vindman, a Russian-hawk functionary on the NSC like some other careerists on the NSC (part of the White House) disagreed with President Trump’s foreign policies, and how he went about it. That is not an impeachable offense, but according to Schiff-for-brains, it is.

    Your testimony is just simply irrelevant, Vindman.

    From some of your own actions you described in your own prepared statement, IMO, you crossed the line into actually attempting to interfere in an early administrative criminal inquiry into Burisma and the Bidens, which I now know was actually restarted by Ukraine in early 2019, and which is not within the purview of an intelligence wonk like you.

    Others on the call between Trump and Zelensky, including those who were charged with producing the telephone conversation memo, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does, who was authorized to listen in.

    Vindman goes to rather peculiar lengths in his written opening statement to Schiff-for-brain’s secret Intel Sanhedrin, to point out that he went to certain persons on the NSC, including the chief counsel, and insisted on putting his own edits into the telephonic memo as he said he remembered them (or had in his notes), but was ignored or rebuffed.

    Apparently, since there’s no audio recordings (or are not supposed to be), a White House telephone memo is a reconstruction of the conversation collected from the aggregate of various authorized listeners’ notes, such as members of the NSC, White House officials and staffers, diplomats, and possibly members of Congress There were something like 25 different listeners taking notes at the time of the Trump-Zelensky’s call.

    Trump has primary responsibility for foreign policy, Vindman, not you. You are not the president of the United States, nor could you ever be.

    And didn’t President Zelensky also run on an anti-corruption platform, as well as promising talks with Russia with an eye to ending the war in Donbass and perhaps reconciliation?

    That would have set the anti-Russian, anti-Putin Ukrainists teeth on edge, already miffed at Trump’s election message that he wanted to open up relations with Putin.


    Real Clear Investigations: The Beltway’s ‘Whistleblower’ Furor Obsesses Over One Name

    By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
    October 30, 2019, 4:21 PM Eastern

    For a town that leaks like a sieve, Washington has done an astonishingly effective job keeping from the American public the name of the anonymous “whistleblower” who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump — even though his identity is an open secret inside the Beltway.

    More than two months after the official filed his complaint, pretty much all that’s known publicly about him is that he is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working at the CIA.

    But the name of a government official fitting that description — Eric Ciaramella — has been raised privately in impeachment depositions, according to officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings, as well as in at least one open hearing held by a House committee not involved in the impeachment inquiry.

    Fearing their anonymous witness could be exposed, Democrats this week blocked Republicans from asking more questions about him and intend to redact his name from all deposition transcripts.

    RealClearInvestigations is disclosing the name because of the public’s interest in learning details of an effort to remove a sitting president from office.

    Further, the official’s status as a “whistleblower” is complicated by his being a hearsay reporter of accusations against the president, one who has “some indicia of an arguable political bias … in favor of a rival political candidate” — as the Intelligence Community Inspector General phrased it circumspectly in originally fielding his complaint.

    Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

    Further, Ciaramella (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

    “He was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” said a former NSC official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

    Also, Ciaramella huddled for “guidance” with the staff of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, including former colleagues also held over from the Obama era whom Schiff’s office had recently recruited from the NSC. (Schiff is the lead prosecutor in the impeachment inquiry.)

    And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said.

    The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

    Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.

    With Ciaramella’s name long under wraps, interest in the intelligence analyst has become so high that a handful of former colleagues have compiled a roughly 40-page research dossier on him. A classified version of the document is circulating on Capitol Hill, and briefings have been conducted based on it. One briefed Republican has been planning to unmask the whistleblower in a speech on the House floor.

    On the Internet, meanwhile, Ciaramella’s name for weeks has been bandied about on Twitter feeds and intelligence blogs as the suspected person who blew the whistle on the president. The mainstream media are also aware of his name.

    Fred Fleitz, Trump adviser: “Everyone knows who he is.”

    “Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows. Even the president knows who he is,” said Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and national security adviser to Trump, who has fielded dozens of calls from the media.

    Yet a rare hush has swept across the Potomac. The usually gossipy nation’s capital remains uncharacteristically — and curiously — mum, especially considering the magnitude of this story, only the fourth presidential impeachment inquiry in U.S. history.

    Trump supporters blame the conspiracy of silence on a “corrupt” and “biased” media trying to protect the whistleblower from due scrutiny about his political motives.

    They also complain Democrats have falsely claimed that exposing his identity would violate whistleblower protections, even though the relevant statute provides limited, not blanket, anonymity – and doesn’t cover press disclosures.

    His Democrat attorneys, meanwhile, have warned that outing him would put him and his family “at risk of harm,” although government security personnel have been assigned to protect him.

    “They’re hiding him,” Fleitz asserted. “They’re hiding him because of his political bias.”

    A CIA officer specializing in Russia and Ukraine, Ciaramella was detailed over to the National Security Council from the agency in the summer of 2015, working under Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser. He also worked closely with the former vice president.

    Susan Rice: Ciaramella worked under Obama’s national security adviser.

    Federal records show that Biden’s office invited Ciaramella to an October 2016 state luncheon the vice president hosted for Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi.

    Other invited guests included Brennan, as well as then-FBI Director James Comey and then-National Intelligence Director James Clapper.

    Several U.S. officials told RealClearInvestigations that the invitation that was extended to Ciaramella, a relatively low-level GS-13 federal employee, was unusual and signaled he was politically connected inside the Obama White House.

    Former White House officials said Ciaramella worked on Ukrainian policy issues for Biden in 2015 and 2016, when the vice president was President Obama’s “point man” for Ukraine.

    A Yale graduate, Ciaramella is said to speak Russian and Ukrainian, as well as Arabic. He had been assigned to the NSC by Brennan.

    He was held over into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the NSC, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.

    “He was moved over to the front office” to temporarily fill a vacancy, said a former White House official, where he “saw everything, read everything.”

    The official added that it soon became clear among NSC staff that Ciaramella opposed the new Republican president’s foreign policies.

    “My recollection of Eric is that he was very smart and very passionate, particularly about Ukraine and Russia. That was his thing – Ukraine,” he said. “He didn’t exactly hide his passion with respect to what he thought was the right thing to do with Ukraine and Russia, and his views were at odds with the president’s policies.”

    “So I wouldn’t be surprised if he was the whistleblower,” the official said.

    In May 2017, Ciaramella went “outside his chain of command,” according to a former NSC co-worker, to send an email alerting another agency that Trump happened to hold a meeting with Russian diplomats in the Oval Office the day after firing Comey, who led the Trump-Russia investigation.

    The email also noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin had phoned the president a week earlier.

    Contents of the email appear to have ended up in the media, which reported Trump boasted to the Russian officials about firing Comey, whom he allegedly called “crazy, a real nut job.”

    In effect, Ciaramella helped generate the “Putin fired Comey” narrative, according to the research dossier making the rounds in Congress, a copy of which was obtained by RealClearInvestigations.

    Ciaramella allegedly argued that “President Putin suggested that President Trump fire Comey,” the report said. “In the days after Comey’s firing, this presidential action was used to further political and media calls for the standup [sic] of the special counsel to investigate ‘Russia collusion.’ “

    In the end, Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no conspiracy between Trump and Putin.

    Ciaramella’s email was cited in a footnote in his report, which mentions only Ciaramella’s name, the date and the recipients “Kelly et al.” Former colleagues said the main recipient was then-Homeland Security Director John Kelly..

    Ciaramella left the Trump White House soon after Mueller was appointed. Attempts to reach Ciaramella were unsuccessful, although his father said in a phone interview from Hartford, where he is a bank executive, that he doubted his son was the whistleblower.

    “He didn’t have that kind of access to that kind of information,” Tony Ciaramella said. “He’s just a guy going to work every day.”

    The whistleblower’s lawyers did not answer emails and phone calls seeking comment. CIA spokesman Luis Rossello declined comment, saying, “Anything on the whistleblower, we are referring to ODNI.” The Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not respond to requests for comment.

    In his complaint, the whistleblower charged that the president used “the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.”

    Specifically, he cited a controversial July 25 [hearsay-Kj] phone call from the White House residence in which Trump asked Ukraine’s new president to help investigate the origins of the Russia “collusion” investigation the Obama administration initiated against his campaign, citing reports that “a lot of it started with Ukraine,” where the former pro-Hillary Clinton regime in Kiev worked with Obama diplomats and Chalupa to try to “sabotage” Trump’s run for president.

    Later in the conversation, Trump also requested information about Biden and his son, since “Biden went around bragging that he” had fired the chief Ukrainian prosecutor at the time a Ukrainian oligarch, who gave Biden’s son a lucrative seat on the board of his energy conglomerate, was under investigation for corruption.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff argued the whistleblower’s complaint, though admittedly based on second-hand information, amounts to an impeachable offense, and they subsequently launched an impeachment inquiry that has largely been conducted in secret.

    The whistleblower filed his “urgent” report against Trump with the I.C. inspector general on Aug. 12, but it was not publicly released until Sept. 26.

    Prior to filing, he had met with Schiff’s Democratic staff for “guidance.” At first, the California lawmaker denied the contacts, but later admitted that his office did, in fact, meet with the whistleblower early on.

    Sean Misko: One of Ciaramella’s closest allies at the NSC, now on Schiff’s committee staff. – Center for a New American Security

    Earlier this year, Schiff recruited two of Ciaramella’s closest allies at the NSC — both whom were also Obama holdovers — to join his committee staff. He hired one, Sean Misko, in August — the same month the whistleblower complaint was filed.

    During closed-door depositions taken in the impeachment inquiry, Misko has been observed handing notes to the lead counsel for the impeachment inquiry, Daniel Goldman, as he asks questions of Trump administration witnesses, officials with direct knowledge of the proceedings told RealClearInvestigations.

    Republicans participating in the restricted inquiry hearings have been asking witnesses about Ciaramella and repeatedly injecting his name into the deposition record, angering Schiff and Democrats, who sources say are planning to scrub the references to Ciaramella from any transcripts of the hearings they may agree to release.

    “Their reaction tells you something,” said one official familiar with the inquiry.

    For example, sources said Ciaramella’s name was invoked by GOP committee members during the closed-door testimony of former NSC official Fiona Hill on Oct. 14. Ciaramella worked with Hill, another Obama holdover, in the West Wing.

    During Tuesday’s deposition of NSC official Alexander Vindman, Democrats shut down a line of inquiry by Republicans because they said it risked revealing the identity of the whistleblower. Republicans wanted to know with whom Vindman spoke within the administration about his concerns regarding Trump’s call to Ukraine. But Schiff instructed the witness not to answer the questions, which reportedly sparked a shouting match between Democrats and Republicans.

    Determined to keep the whistleblower’s identity secret, Schiff recently announced it may not be necessary for him to testify even in closed session. Republicans argue that by hiding his identity, the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.

    Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Oversight Committee, asserted the American people have the right to know the person who is trying to bring down the president for whom 63 million voted.

    “It’s tough to determine someone’s credibility if you can’t put them under oath and ask them questions,” he said.

    Added Jordan: “The people want to know. I want to get to the truth.”

    Rep. Louis Gohmert: Ciaramella was “supposed to be a point person on Ukraine, during the time when Ukraine was its most corrupt, and he didn’t blow any whistles on their corruption.”
    AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

    In an open House Natural Resources Committee hearing last week, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) seemingly out of left field asked a witness about “Eric Ciaramella of the Obama National Security Council,” in what the Washington press corps took as a bid to out the whistleblower. He later told a Dallas radio station he knew the whistleblower’s name. “A lot of us in Washington know who it is,” Gohmert said, adding he’s a “very staunch Democrat” who was “supposed to be a point person on Ukraine, during the time when Ukraine was its most corrupt, and he didn’t blow any whistles on their corruption.”

    The Washington Post ran a news story over the weekend critical of Republicans for allegedly trying to “unmask” the whistleblower, for attempting to do the job journalists would normally do. Last week, the paper ran an op-ed by the whistleblower’s attorneys claiming he was no longer relevant to the inquiry and beseeching the public to let their client slip back into obscurity.

    For its part, the New York Times ran a story last month reporting details about the whistleblower’s background, but stopped short of fully identifying him, suggesting it didn’t know his politics or even his name. “Little else is known about him,” the paper claimed.

    On Thursday, Democrats plan a House vote on new impeachment-inquiry rules that would give Republicans for the first time the ability to call their own witnesses. Only, their requests must first be approved by the Democrats. So there is a good chance the whistleblower, perhaps the most important witness of all, will remain protected from critical examination.

    This and all other original articles created by RealClearInvestigations may be republished for free with attribution. (These terms do not apply to outside articles linked on the site.)

    Identity of the ‘gossip-blower’ is still uncertain, even though Ciaramella checks a lot of boxes. All we have is that he’s a Democrat and an ex-NSC member who returned to Agency (CIA).

  33. Citizenfitz October 31, 2019 @ 1:50 pm

    Jootoob is really on a purge, of anything reflecting poorly on the Tribe.

    Many of my old bookmarked channels there have been deleted.

    In fact they’ve purged a great many things that contradict the imposed think.

    Prayer and fasting, friends.

  34. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 2:03 pm

    Daily Caller: Who Are The Two Democrats That Voted No On The Impeachment Inquiry?

    Only two Democratic congressmen voted “no” on a resolution formalizing an impeachment inquiry Thursday: New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew and Minnesota Rep. Collin Peterson.


    I’ll be sending each of them an email for standing up, for doing the right thing and upholding due process, and not being a party to Shifty Schift-for-brains secret Sanhedrin.

  35. Citizenfitz October 31, 2019 @ 7:21 pm

    Called my DC reps about the impeachment farce. One of them has come out fairly strongly for Trump.

    Then called the WH and voiced support for him, letting them know I’d already spoken to my Congressmen. They like hearing we’ve upvoted Trump to them.

    KJ, I called Debbie Lesko’s DC office too thanking her for putting a scalpel to the farce proceedings.

    Even though I’m not her constituent, the guy I spoke to was happy to hear fom me. He’d probably been getting harangued by libs all day.

    For good measure I trolled schiffty’s DC office.

    Prayer and fasting, my friends.

  36. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 7:32 pm

    Dear Citizenfitz,

    Az Rep Debbie Lesko, I forgot about how she skewered the Dems and shredded Schiff.

    I’ll be thanking her (office) tomorrow by phone.


    Congresswoman Debbie Lesko Retweeted

    Elizabeth Harrington

    “Will the gentlelady yield?”

    “I will when I’m done, thank you.”

  37. Er_Ja_ October 31, 2019 @ 8:13 pm

    If we as a people have any hope of stopping the liberal demon possessed Democrats, we must turn as a People back to Fearing the Creator and uphold the desire to keep the Commandments.

    We as a people are promised to be protected by the Angels and Yahwah’s hand, you call him God, whatever name you call him, he requires us to Fear him.

    We must FEAR the Creator and keep his Commandments ‘Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear [Yahwah] God, and keep the Commandments: For this is the whole duty of man.’ Ecc. 12:3

    The prophets of the Bible shouted we must ALL fear the Creator and keep his Commandments. The founders of the country and pioneers were know as being “God fearing men”.

    We as a people have sinned against the Creator, we deserve Judgment.

    If we ever can expect to turn this country around we need the Creator’s help. He helps those that fear him and want his Right Ruling ways (Righteousness); his laws; the Commandments, he requires us to have obedience to keeping, and intent to do the right thing.

    Christ even said this ‘If ye love me, keep my commandments.’ Joh. 14:15.

    That was the basic message old time preachers preached; ‘Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;’ 2 Thes. 2:3

    We are experiencing the great falling away spoken of in the Bible. It is a falling away from the Fear of the Creator.

    Few people today believe that you must live in fear of the Creator to keep his Commandments; if you fear Judgment and Hell; then you would not want to transgress the Creator’s laws.

    ‘For the commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life:’ ‘. . .If a man love me, he will keep my words [commandments] : and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.’ Joh. 14:23

    He values those that fear him; because if we fear him we are keeping his good laws. He calls a fearful heart his Treasure ‘And wisdom and knowledge shall be the stability of thy times, and strength of salvation: the fear of [Yahwah – Shua ] the LORD is his treasure.’ Is. 33:6

    ‘Men and brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whosoever among you feareth [Yahwah] God, to you is the word of this salvation sent.’ Acts. 13:26

    Fearing the Creator literally means you will hold yourself to keeping his Commandments; this is how we restore blessings to our nation; ‘There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling. For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.’ Ps. 91:10-11

    That is a scriptural promise that he will protect obedient fearing people from Evil.

    Most preachers today are literally cowards, they give motivational speeches and preach prosperity messages without telling you that to get prosperous, and secure blessings on your life and to this nation, that you must first learn to fear the Creator.

    That means you will Keep his laws, your intentions will be to keep his ways.

    This is what he says about preachers in our time: ‘His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.’ Is. 56:10.

    Your typical preacher is only interested in making money before teaching you must fear the Creator and keep his Commandments. Fearing the Creator is basic and preaching the fear of the Creator is itself a commandment; ‘But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.’ Lu. 12:5

    In these days we must all be like this regarding fear preaching:

    ‘Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:’ Mat. 24:17

    What’s on the housetop? Antennas.

    We are to shout we must repent and fear the Creator across the highways and byways of communication, and never stop shouting the fear is the key to getting into the house of the Creator.

    The thief on the Right side of Christ [Yahwah – Shua] when he was crucified, admitted he deserved his judgment and preached fearing the Creator and that we all need to keep his Commandments. Marian poured expensive oil on his feet, symbolizing she gave her all. She feared him and was intent on keeping now his Commandments. .

    The answer to 1776 is fear the Creator and you will live! ‘But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.’ Mat. 24:13

    Endure means to keep the Commandments. Fear is how you push yourself to endure to the end. That is the Key of David. It is the key to the door of the House of the Creator. ‘But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.’ 2 Tim. 4:5

    Best preaching on the planet is broadcast at

  38. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 8:16 pm

    John Solomon, investigative reporter and political commentator, has received a number of prestigious awards for investigative journalism, solidly, meticulously, and deservedly so.

    Most important impeachment mythbuster — Ukraine had re-started its investigation into Burisma, and things Biden, back in February, still during the Poreshenko administration, and months before the Trump-Zelensky telephone call.


    John Solomon Reports: Debunking some of the Ukraine scandal myths about Biden and election interference

    There is a long way to go in the impeachment process, and there are some very important issues still to be resolved. But as the process marches on, a growing number of myths and falsehoods are being spread by partisans and their allies in the news media.

    The early pattern of misinformation about Ukraine, Joe Biden and election interference mirrors closely the tactics used in late 2016 and early 2017 to build the false and now-debunked narrative that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin colluded to hijack the 2016 election.

    Facts do matter. And they prove to be stubborn evidence, even in the midst of a political firestorm.

    So here are the facts (complete with links to the original materials) debunking some of the bigger fables in the Ukraine scandal.

    Must read:


    John Solomon Reports: The most important stories on the Ukraine scandal

  39. Brother Nathanael October 31, 2019 @ 9:06 pm

    It’s A Tribal Affair — Termites in the House
    Schiff & Nadler Contract Outside JEWish Legal Counsel

    Completely separate from the Office of General Counsel for the House of Representatives, in February, Schiff hired the Jew Daniel Goldman for the House Intelligence Committee outside counsel.

    Schiff originally hired Goldman as a signal that he was going to conduct an aggressive investigation of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia during the 2016 Presidential campaign — until the Mueller Report fizzled all that.

    Nadler also in February hired for the House Judiciary Committee counsel Obama Administration the Jew lawyer Norm Eisen, co-founder of Soros-funded CREW — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

    Nadler also hired the Jew criminal defense attorney Barry Berke to help Nadler’s oversight of the DOJ and Meuller Investigation.

    Back in February 2018, Berke and Eisen were penning “obstruction of justice” stories against Trump.

    Politico (2/12/2019): House Republicans criticized the new Nadler hires as a thinly-veiled sign of plans to try to oust Trump.

    “Looks like Democrats are staffing up for impeachment before Mueller’s report is even out,” said Rep. Doug Collins, the Republican ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, referring to the special counsel’s much-anticipated findings.

    The Georgia lawmaker also cited an op-ed by the new House Democratic consultants published last December in the New York Times.

    “Is this the new gig Berke and Eisen were auditioning for,” he asked, “when they predicted last December the president was unlikely to have ‘a calm 2019’?”

  40. Jesus Is Near October 31, 2019 @ 9:56 pm

    Hello +BN and all, ALL this validated and truthful information is simply beyond comprehension!

    It’s simply stunning! All the evil things these people who call themselves Jews but are not, but are liars from the beginning, the children of THEIR father, The Devil have said and done. Are there no eyes to see this?

    And it’s been going on, they’ve been getting away with it for decades here in The U.S.A. – it’s mind boggling! It’s – INSANE!!!!

    I would say that there is no more “tolerance” for this behavior here in America.

    I think that they will be all rounded up, placed in camps/ghettos, in wait to be exported to another country, but where!? I think I read earlier that +BN said that Trump wanted to buy Greenland, and that maybe that would be their new home.

    Don’t know, but I can NOT think of ANY other way to rid ourselves of these pests and their pestilence and still be on the side of God Almighty+.

    I reckon there might even be some who when that civil war starts off takes the “law” into their own hands and start dispatching these vermin with prejudice back to their father, the devil. ALL in the name of God Almighty.

    Hey wait – didn’t someone try this about 70+ years ago and before?

  41. KathJuliane October 31, 2019 @ 10:54 pm

    This article in American Thinker was written before Lt. Col A.S. Vindman danced to Waltzing Yehuda in his dress blues on the way to testifying in Schiff’s Secret Sanhedrin.

    Vindman has a twin brother, Yevgeny S. who is also an Army lt. colonel with JAG, assigned to the civilian sector who works for the White House NSC handling ethics issues.

    Alexander took his brother Yevgeny to a meeting with Jewish lawyer John Eisenberg, the top NSC lawyer, to raise concerns about the president’s conduct on the call.

    The twins have an older brother named Leonid Simon Vindman.

    Leonid Simon Vindman is the “Founder and Managing Partner, Tungsten Capital Advisors” and “has approximately thirty years of experience in the financial markets,” his company website states.

    “During the past twenty five years, he has been focusing predominantly on Central Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia where he completed some of the biggest investment and advisory transactions in the region,” according to the website.

    “He also completed transactions in the Middle East, and traveled extensively in Asia and Africa.”

    The page continues: “Prior to founding Tungsten he was a Managing Director responsible for investment banking origination and client coverage activities for Russia and CIS region at UniCredit Group – the largest international bank in Central and Eastern Europe at that time.

    “Previously he worked as a Vice President Investment Banking at JPMorgan Chase, Principal Banker at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the EBRD), Senior Associate at Bankers Trust and Manager at Central Europe Trust.”

    And that would include Ukraine, and rubbing shoulders, or perhaps rubbing shekels, with some of the ultra-corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs in the wild and wooly days before Euromaidan.

    Oligarchs like Victor Pinchuk, who donated a big wad of cash, $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, and was working to get her elected.

    Coordinating the impeachment circus out of the limelight is Pelosi’s hand picked General Counsel for the House, Douglas Letter, who may be Jewish. Looks it, anyway. But he lets Pelosi do the talking.

    Letter spent 40 years at the Department of Justice and served as director of the Civil Division Appellate Staff before retiring and going to the House.

    And Lt. Col. Alexander Symeon Vindman, Director for European Affairs for the United States National Security Council (NSC), makes three…


    American Thinker: Was Adam Schiff running a spy operation against the White House?

    By Monica Showalter (Oct 12, 2019)

    Seems every day brings a new revelation about Democratic efforts to rig an impeachment of the president.

    The false claims and astonishing conflicts of interest being thrown out there are piling up fast.

    The latest, from the San Francisco Examiner, exposes House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff’s choice of staffers, who it turns out were two disgruntled Deep-Staters from the White House who had actually worked with the so-called “whistleblower”:

    “Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.

    The whistleblower was an NSC official who worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and who has expertise in Ukraine, the Washington Examiner has reported.

    A career CIA analyst with Ukraine expertise, the whistleblower aired his concerns about a phone conversation between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to a House Intelligence Committee aide on Schiff’s staff.

    He had previously informed the CIA’s legal counsel’s office.

    Schiff initially denied he knew anything about the complaint before it was filed, stating on Sep. 17: “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to.”

    But it later emerged that a member of his staff had spoken to the whistleblower before his complaint was submitted on Aug. 12. The Washington Post concluded that Schiff “clearly made a statement that was false.”

    Grace, 36, was hired to help Schiff’s committee investigate the Trump White House. That month, Trump accused Schiff of “stealing people who work at White House.

    Grace worked at the NSC from 2016 to 2018 in U.S.-China relations and then briefly at the Center for a New American Security think tank, which was founded by two former senior Obama administration officials.”

    So these people were all buddies beforehand, and this would explain why the so-called whistleblower had been sneaking around with Schiff’s staff before he made his whistleblower complaint.

    And that came only after someone with influence was able to get the inspector general of the Intelligence Community (IGIC) to change the rules about whistleblowers needing no firsthand knowledge about the wrongdoing they were supposedly reporting.

    Once that rules change was put into place, the whistleblower got going.

    More and more, this sounds like a pre-planned setup. One Trump operative has a very good summary of what seems to have been really going on as these anything but exculpatory stories mount:

    Tony Shaffer


    The real headline is this: @AdamSchiff was spying on the White House illegally & rumor is the “whistleblower” met with Schiff on a regular basis before the whistleblowing – that is why he went to the Dem side of the Intel committee first…a total setup

    Schiff was essentially running an illegal spy operation against the White House, recruiting his staffers, having them recruit their whistleblowers, grooming them up, changing the rules so they could file their complaints, and then lying that they knew anything about the lunatic efforts to get President Trump impeached.

    See, they were just standing there, minding their own business when all this stuff happened. Everything that did happen was just…a coincidence.

    Experienced intelligence operatives, and apparently this Trump operative has this sort of background, like to say there are no coincidences.

    As facts continue to roll out, it’s getting more and more obvious that Schiff’s operation was to orchestrate this impeachment scenario all along, going into high gear with the flame-out of the Mueller investigation.

    Trump’s been having a bad time with public opinion in the wake of the Schiff operation orchestrating the media coverage as well. But the facts on the ground suggest it was all an illegal spying operation on the president.

    And that’s a far more concrete crime than anything Trump is accused of committing. Right now, Schiff has 109 congressional representatives signed on to GOP rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona’s call to condemn and censure Schiff for this sick little illegal freelance operation to spy on Trump.

    It’s an abuse of his office, for sure, given that Schiff is supposed to be focused on intelligence, not on being one of those creepy secret police characters in The Lives of Others.

    It’s also an outrageous misuse of taxpayer dollars.

    In light of this Schiff spy operation, and if Democrats don’t want some backatcha next time there’s a Dem in office with a Republican House, it really ought to be every last one of them signed up to that Biggs list.


    Well, dear +BN, to add to your list of hired Jewish termites in the House this one was hired about Oct 17:

    House Judiciary Just Added an Impeachment Scholar as Trump Inquiry Ramps Up

    Kaplan Hecker & Fink of counsel Joshua Matz is the latest attorney to be added to the committee’s legal team.

    Matz even co-authored a book with another Jew, Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe, ‘To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment’ — published May 2018.

  42. Citizenfitz October 31, 2019 @ 10:55 pm

    @Hasbarat, 9:56 pm

    How’s the weather there in Jew York?

  43. Rick November 1, 2019 @ 9:27 am

    They have taken over everything.

    Our country is ruined.

    Free people do not live like this.

    You’re right: they need to be sent packing.

    Because they do awful things all day long, they are afraid of the body of the people: that is why they have tasked “homeland security” with breaking down and humiliating ordinary people.

    Go to Geneva, you won’t be treated like shit, as by the americans.

  44. Rick November 1, 2019 @ 9:33 am

    Heavenly Father, I speak in the last free place in the internet, please help me to escape the horrible people of the United States.

    Heretofore to be known as the Rotted-Out Country.

    There is nothing here for me, nothing that I want.

    This place is evil, built on the backs and bones of murdered Native American Indians, and now, sucked dry by blood sucking Jews.

  45. Controlled Opposition November 1, 2019 @ 11:19 am

    The Russia Collusion Scam and the Trump Impeachment Scam are good current examples of Hegelian Dialectic plots.

    Based on Divide and Conquer strategy the bankster Jews divide people into opposing groups such as Democrats vs Republicans, Left vs Right, “minorities” vs whites, Protestants vs Catholics, Christians vs Muslims, etc, and incite them against each other to weaken or destroy each other.

    Bankster Jews own all the significant media outlets. Jews Media lords have Foxnews leading the “Right” and other media outlets leading the “Left.”

    The banksters’ desired outcome in their Hegelian Dialectic plot is overthrow of the old Christian order of the world so they can replace it with their Jew World Order as per the Protocols of Zion.

    Trump is one of the bankster’s political puppets or else he wouldn’t have been given the Republican nomination and wouldn’t be the prez. Trump hasn’t ended the immigrant invasions, hasn’t ended the wars for Israel, etc. Trump has served Israel and the Jews instead, like Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc.

    Trump has appointed lots of Jews into high places in government. Trump is doing what bankster Jews want, so the banksters would like to keep Trump in office for another term.

    Wednesday’s lowering of the Fed discount rate to keep the stock markets and economy propped up is another indication that the banksters want Trump to be re-elected.

    If the banksters decide not to have Trump re-elected they will start jacking up the Fed discount rate before election day November 2020, markets would crash, companies would lay-off people in mass, etc.

    The banksters use their left wing media to preach disdain for Trump, white people, and Christianity. The banksters use their right wing media such as Foxnews to defend Trump and preach disdain for the “left.”

    These tactics have generated lots of support for Trump from right wing people and soured the taste for democrat madness among left wing people.

    These bankster directed tactics strengthen right wing support for Trump and weaken left wing support for democrats like Adam Schitt who are being made to appear as insane.

    Have no fear of Trump losing the election to a democrat. Unless the banksters change their mind before next November, Trump will be re-elected by a comfortable margin.

    Both parties, Democrat and Republican parties both, were created by Jews as tools to help build a Jew World Order. Political parties are puppets whose strings are held by bankster Jews.

    The illusion that left wingers see is that Democrats are their champions. The illusion that right wingers see is that Republicans are their champions. The reality is that both parties are controlled by bankster Jews.

    Per prophecy, the support for Israel will end at some point. At that point, no one will help Israel and the Jews anymore. The beast she rides and the ten horns will start hating Mystery Babylon, she will fall, and be destroyed.

    It’s easy to see why nations would start hating Israel and the Jew World Order madness if they knew who was behind 9/11, the USS Liberty, LBQT, immigrant invasions, wars for Israel, her war on Christianity, her many evils.

    The Protocols of Zion –

  46. ussa nyet November 1, 2019 @ 1:28 pm

    Get this: head Demonrat “strategists” call for the elimination of the 2020 election if they think Trump might win again.

    “In that case, it would be mandatory to save democracy.”

    Please stock up on weaponry at your earliest convenience.

  47. Citizenfitz November 1, 2019 @ 3:21 pm

    Beta O’Rourke has dropped out of the 2020 Presidential race.

    One down, ten to go!

  48. Brother Nathanael November 1, 2019 @ 6:33 pm

    President of Syria Bashar al-Assad’s Interview

    Journalist: Hello and welcome to this special interview with the President of the Syrian Arab Republic, His Excellency Dr Bashar al-Assad. Thank you for receiving us Mr President. Your last interview with Syrian media was several years ago and therefore we have a lot of questions. We will begin with political questions and then move into internal issues.

    President Assad: You are welcome, and as always let us speak with full openness.

    Journalist: Mr President, thank you very much for receiving us. Since the political issues are pressing at the moment we will start with politics, Mr President. The United States announced a few days ago that the leader of the terrorist organization ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was killed. And it thanked Russia, Syria, Iraq, the Turks and the Kurds for helping kill Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Trump thanked Syria, but we have not heard any comment from Damascus. What is your take on Trump thanking Syria? Did Syria really take part in this operation?

    President Assad: Absolutely not, we heard about this only through the media. Maybe, the reason behind including a number of countries as participants in this operation is to give it credibility so these countries will feel not embarrassed, but have the desire to be that they are part of a “great” operation, as the Americans have tried to portray it. And in this way, they are credited with fighting terrorism. We do not need such credit. We are the ones fighting terrorism. We have no relations and have had no contact with any American institutions.

    More importantly, we do not really know whether the operation did actually take place or not. No aircraft were detected on radar screens. Why were the remains of Baghdadi not shown? This is the same scenario that was followed with Bin Laden. If there are going to use different pretexts in order not to show the remains, let us recall how President Saddam Husain was captured and how the whole operation was shown from A to Z; they showed pictures and video clips after they captured him. The same happened when they killed his sons several months later; they showed the bodies. So, why did they hide everything about the Bin Laden operation and now also the Baghdadi operation? This is part of the tricks played by the Americans. That is why we should not believe everything they say unless they come up with evidence. American politicians are actually guilty until proven innocent, not the other way around.

    Journalist: Mr President, if Baghdadi has actually been killed, does it mean the end of his organization, or is it as usual that there will be new leaders and new organizations which are being prepared for the moment when the cards of their predecessors have been burned out?

    President Assad: First, Baghdadi represents ISIS, and ISIS represents a type of doctrine, which is the extremist Wahhabi doctrine. This type of thought is more than two centuries old. As long as this thought is alive and has not receded, this means that the death of Baghdadi, or even the death of ISIS as a whole, will have no effect on this extremist thought.

    Regarding Baghdadi as an individual, it is well-known that he was in American prisons in Iraq, and that they let him out in order to play this role. So, he is someone who could be replaced at any moment. Was he really killed? Was he killed but through a different method, in a very ordinary way? Was he kidnapped? Was he hidden? Or was he removed and given a facelift? God only knows. American politics are no different from Hollywood; it relies on the imagination. Not even science fiction, just mere imagination. So, you can take American politics and see it in Hollywood or else you can bring Hollywood and see it through American politics. I believe the whole thing regarding this operation is a trick. Baghdadi will be recreated under a different name, a different individual, or ISIS in its entirety might be reproduced as needed under a different name but with the same thought and the same purpose. The director of the whole scenario is the same, the Americans.

    Journalist: Questions have been raised about the Russian-Turkish agreement, particularly the item related to maintaining the status quo in the region which was subject to the Turkish aggression, Tal Abyadh and Ras al-Ain with a depth of thirty-two kilometers. What some people understood from this was that it legitimized the Turkish occupation, particularly that the agreement did not include any Syrian role within these areas which were discussed in the agreement. What is your response to that?

    President Assad: First, the Russian principles have been clear throughout this war and even before the Russian base that started supporting the Syrian army in 2015. These principles are based on international law, Syrian sovereignty and Syria’s territorial integrity. This has not changed, neither before, nor after, nor with changing circumstances. However, Russian policy deals with the realities on the ground. These realities on the ground have achieved two things; the withdrawal of armed groups from the north to the south in coordination with the Syrian Army, and as such the advance of the Syrian Army to the north, to the area not occupied by the Turks. These two elements are positive, but they do not cancel out the negative aspects of the Turkish presence until they are driven out one way or another. This agreement is a temporary one, not permanent. If we take for example the de-escalation areas at a certain period of time, some people believed that they were permanent and that they will give terrorists the right to remain in their areas indefinitely. The fact was that it was an opportunity to protect civilians, and also to talk to the terrorists with the objective of driving them out later. So, we have to distinguish between ultimate or strategic goals on the one hand, and tactical approaches on the other.

    In the short term, it is a good agreement – and let me explain why; the Turkish incursion, not only reflects Turkey’s territorial greed but also expresses American desire. The Russian relationship with Turkey is positive because it reigns in Turkish aspirations. On the other hand, it outmaneuvers the American game in the north. Let me explain this. The recent German proposal which was immediately supported by NATO – and the Germans would not make this except on behalf of the Americans, NATO is the same thing as America. The proposal talked about restoring security to this region under international auspices. This means that the area would be outside the control of the Syrian state and thus making separation a reality on the ground. Through this agreement, the Russians reigned in the Turks, outmaneuvered the Americans and aborted the call for internationalization which was proposed by the Germans. That is why this agreement is a positive step. It does not achieve everything, in the sense that it will not pressure the Turks to leave immediately. However, it limits the damage and paves the way for the liberation of this region in the future, or the immediate future, as we hope.

    Intervention: God willing

    Journalist: Since you described the agreement as temporary, but Turkey, as we have known it, does not abide by agreements. Consequently, the question is what if Turkey continued to occupy the areas which it has controlled as a result of its recent aggression? You said repeatedly that the Syrian state will use every possible means to defend itself. But practically, did not the Russian-Turkish agreement prevent the ability to try and use such means?

    President Assad: Let us take another example, which is Idlib. There is an agreement through the Astana Process that the Turks will leave. The Turks did not abide by this agreement, but we are liberating Idlib. There was a delay for a year; the political process, the political dialogue, and various attempts were given an opportunity to drive the terrorists out. All possibilities were exhausted. In the end, we liberated areas gradually through military operations. The same will apply in the northern region after exhausting all political options.

    We must remember that Erdogan aimed, from the beginning of the war, to create a problem between the Syrian people and the Turkish people, to make it an enemy, which will happen through a military clash. At the beginning of the war, the Turkish Army supported the Syrian Army and cooperated with us to the greatest possible extent, until Erdogan’s coup against the Army. Therefore, we must continue in this direction, and ensure that Turkey does not become an enemy state. Erdogan and his group are enemies, because he leads these policies, but until now most of the political forces in Turkey are against Erdogan’s policies. So, we must ensure not to turn Turkey into an enemy, and here comes the role of friends – the Russian role and the Iranian role.

    Journalist: Picking up on this idea, Mr President, the actions taken by the Turks recently, and by Erdogan, in particular, like Turkishization, building universities, imposing the use of certain languages. These are actions taken by someone who is not thinking of leaving – just a follow up on your idea, since you said that they will leave sooner or later. What about these actions?

    President Assad: If he was thinking of getting out, he would have left Idlib. You might say that there is no Turkish army, in the technical sense in Idlib. But we are in one arena, the whole Syrian arena is one – a single theatre of operations. From the furthest point in the south to the furthest point in the north Turkey is the American proxy in this war, and everywhere we have fought we have been fighting this proxy. So, when he does not leave after we exhaust every possible means, there won’t be any other choice but war, this is self-evident. I am saying that in the near future we must give room to the political process in its various forms. If it does not yield results then this is an enemy and you go to war against it; there is no other choice.

    Journalist: Nevertheless, some people said that the American withdrawal from northern Syria, after which came the Turkish aggression, and then the Russian-Turkish agreement. All of that came within an American-Russian-Turkish agreement. What do you say to that?

    President Assad: This was meant to show that Russia accepted the Turkish incursion, or that Russia wanted to turn a blind eye in the fact that. In fact, it is not true. For over a year, the Russians were concerned about the seriousness of such a proposition. We all knew that the Turkish proposition was serious, but it was shackled by American orders or desires. Some people might criticize the Russians for this outcome, due to their position at the United Nations. As I said a short while ago, the Russians deal with realities on the ground, consequently, they try to ensure that all political conditions are in place in order to pave the way for their departure from Syria and limit the damage by the Turks or reign in the Turkish recalcitrance aimed at inflicting more damage and occupying more land. But the Russians were certainly not part of this agreement – Russian agreements are always public. The Russian-Turkish agreement was announced immediately, with all its items; the agreement between us and the Kurds, with Russian mediation and support was also made public right from the very beginning. There is no hidden agenda in Russian policies, which gives us assurances.

    Journalist: But the American-Turkish meetings are not announced. You said repeatedly that Erdogan’s objective, or creating the buffer zone, was Erdogan’s main objective from day one of the war on Syria. President Obama refused to accept this buffer zone, while today we are seeing certain actions on the ground. Does this mean that Obama was better than Trump?

    President Assad: We should not bet on any American President. First, when Erdogan says that he decided to make an incursion or that they told the Americans, he is trying to project Turkey as a super power or to pretend that he makes his own decisions; all these are theatrics shared between him and the Americans. In the beginning, nobody was allowed to interfere, because the Americans and the West believed that demonstrations will spread out and decide the outcome. The demonstrations did not spread as they wanted, so they shifted towards using weapons. When weapons did not decide the outcome, they moved towards the terrorist extremist organizations with their crazy ideology in order to decide the outcome militarily. They were not able to. Here came the role of ISIS in the summer of 2014 in order to disperse the efforts of the Syrian Arab Army, which it was able to do, at which point came the Russian intervention. When all bets on the field failed, it was necessary for Turkey to interfere and turn the tables; this is their role.

    As for Trump, you might ask me a question and I give you an answer that might sound strange. I say that he is the best American President, not because his policies are good, but because he is the most transparent president. All American presidents perpetrate all kinds of political atrocities and all crimes and yet still win the Nobel Prize and project themselves as defenders of human rights and noble and unique American values, or Western values in general. The reality is that they are a group of criminals who represent the interests of American lobbies, i.e. the large oil and arms companies, and others. Trump talks transparently, saying that what we want is oil. This is the reality of American policy, at least since WWII. We want to get rid of such and such a person or we want to offer a service in return for money. This is the reality of American policy. What more do we need than a transparent opponent? That is why the difference is in form only, while the reality is the same.

    Journalist: The leader of the dissolved Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, made statements to the media in which he said that Trump promised them that before withdrawal he will contact the Russians to find a solution to the Kurdish question by making an agreement with the Russians and the Syrian state to give the Kurds an opportunity to defend themselves. Was there really such an agreement, and what is the fate of non-border regions in the Syrian Jazeera, the regions which were under the control of the armed militias called SDF? Have these regions been handed over to the Syrian state, and if so in what way? Is it only in the military sense; or ultimately has the return of the Syrian institutions to these regions taken place?

    President Assad: Do you mean an American-Kurdish agreement?

    Journalist: The Americans promised the Kurds to find a solution to their cause by influencing the Russians to reach an understanding with the Syrian state to give them an opportunity to defend themselves.

    President Assad: Regardless of whether contact has been made or not, as I said before what ever the Americans say has no credibility, whether they say that to an enemy or a friend, the result is the same – it is unreliable. That is why we do not waste our time on things like this. The only Russian agreement with the Kurds was what we talked about in terms of a Russian role in reaching an agreement with Kurdish groups – we should not say with the Kurds, because this is inaccurate and we cannot talk about one segment – the groups which call themselves SDF with the Syrian Army to be deployed. Of course, the Syrian Army cannot be deployed only to carry out purely security or military acts. The deployment of the Syrian Army is an expression of the presence of the Syrian state, which means the presence of all the services which should be provided by the state. This agreement was concluded, and we reached most regions but not completely. There are still obstacles. We intervene because we have direct and old relations – before the Turkish incursion – with these groups. Sometimes they respond, in other places they don’t. But certainly, the Syrian Arab Army will reach these areas simultaneously with full public services, which means the return of full state authority. I want to reiterate, that this should take place gradually. Second, the situation will not return as before. There are facts on the ground which need to be addressed, and this will take time. There are new facts related to people on the ground which took place when the state was absent. There are armed groups; we do not expect them to hand over their weapons immediately. Our policy should be gradual and rational, and should take the facts into account. But the ultimate goal is to return to the situation as it used to be previously which is the full control of the state.

    Journalist: After everything that happened: they targeted the Syrian state, Syrian citizens, the Syrian Arab Army. Throughout the war years, they played a bad role and were American proxies, after all this, are we as Syrians able to live with the Kurds once again?

    President Assad: To be accurate, this issue is raised repeatedly, and sometimes in private gatherings. And I know that part of your role is to repeat what you hear, regardless of personal conviction. What happened during this war is a distortion of concepts; to say that this group has a certain characteristic, negative or positive, is neither objective nor rational. It is also unpatriotic. Among the Kurds there were people who were American agents or proxies. This is true, but among the Arabs there were similar cases in the Jazeera area and in other areas in Syria. This applies to most segments of Syrian society. The mistake which was made was that this action was made by a group of Kurds who made themselves representatives, not only of the Kurds, but of the Arabs and others segments of society in al-Jazeera region. The Americans, through their support with weapons and money – of course the money is not American, it comes from some gulf Arab states – helped establish the authority of these groups over all segments of the society, leading us to believe that those in the area were all Kurds. So, we are actually dealing with the various Kurdish parties. As for the Kurds themselves, most of them had good relations with the Syrian state, and they were always in contact with us and proposed genuine patriotic ideas. In some of the areas we entered, the reaction of the Kurds was no less positive, or less joyful and happy than the reaction of other people there. So, this evaluation is not accurate. Yes, very simply, we can live once again with each other. If the answer were no, it means that Syria will never be stable again.

    Journalist: But what is the problem with the Kurds, even before the war? Where does the problem with them lie?

    President Assad: Although we stood with these groups for decades, and we could have paid the price in 1998 through a military clash with Turkey because of them, we stood with them based on the cultural rights of these groups or of this segment of Syrian society. What do they accuse the Syrian state of? They accuse it of being Chauvinistic, and sometimes they accuse the Ba’th Party of being a Chauvinistic party although the census conducted in 1962 was not under the Ba’th Party, because it was not in power at the time. They accuse us of depriving this group of their cultural rights. Let us presume that what they say is correct. Can I, as an individual, be open and close-minded at the same time? I cannot. Can the state be open or tolerant and intolerant and close-minded at the same time? It cannot. If we take an example of the latest group which joined the Syrian fabric, the Armenians. The Armenians have been a patriotic group par excellence. This was proven without a shadow of doubt during the war. At the same time, this group has its own societies, its own churches and more sensitively, it has its own schools. And if you attend any Armenian celebration, a wedding, or any other event – and I used to attend such events because I used to have friends among them previously – they sing their traditional songs but afterwards they sing national, politically-inclined songs. Is there any form of freedom that exceeds this? The Syrian Armenians are the least, among other Armenians of the world, dissolved in society. They have integrated, but not dissolved into Syrian society. They have maintained all their characteristics. Why should we be open here and unopen with others? The reason is that there are separatist propositions. There are maps showing a Syrian Kurdistan as part of a larger Kurdistan. Now, it is our right to defend our territorial integrity and to be wary of separatist propositions. But we do not have a problem with Syrian diversity. On the contrary, Syrian diversity is rich and beautiful which translates into strength. We do not have an adverse view of this; but richness and diversity are one thing and separating and fragmenting the country is something else, something contrary. That is the problem.

    Journalist: Just to pick up on this idea, Mr President, living with each other. In your answer, you said that we must ultimately live with each other. The problem here is not only with the Kurdish component. There were groups of the population who lived in different areas outside the control of the Syrian state for years. What about those? What is the state’s plan to reintegrate them under the idea of living together, particularly the children among them, because with children we are talking about Syria’s future generation? What is the plan for these people?

    President Assad: Actually, the problem is primarily with children and then with young people in the second instance. There are several issues, one of which is that this generation does not know the meaning of the state and the rule of law. They have not lived under the state, they have lived under armed groups. But the worst and most dangerous impact is on the children, who in some areas have not learned the Arabic language, and others who have learned wrong concepts – extremist concepts or concepts against the state or the homeland and other concepts which were proposed from outside Syria and taught to them in formal school curricula. This was the subject of discussion during the past few weeks, particularly during the past few days, because the deployment of the Syrian Army in large areas in the northern regions highlighted this problem on a large scale. Currently ministries, particularly the Ministry of Education and also the Ministries of Defence and the Interior are studying this issue. I believe there will be a statement and a solution proposed shortly, albeit general in the first phase which will be followed by administrative measures in order to assimilate these people within the system of the Syrian state. For instance, who will enroll in the Syrian Army, who will enroll in the police, who will enroll in schools? Somebody who is twelve years old: how will they integrate into the Syrian school system if they know nothing of the curriculum? The same applies to those who are in primary schools. I believe the solution is to assimilate all within the national system, but there should be special measures in order to reintegrate them into this system, and I believe in the next few days we will have a final picture of this.

    Journalist: returning to politics, and to the United States, in particular, President Donald Trump announced his intention to keep a limited number of his troops in Syria while redeploying some of them on the Jordanian borders and on the borders of the Israeli enemy, while some of them will protect the oil fields. What is your position in this regard, and how will the Syrian state respond to this illegitimate presence?

    President Assad: Regardless of these statements, the reality is that the Americans are occupiers, whether they are in the east, the north or the south, the result is the same. Once again, we should not be concerned with his statements, but rather deal with the reality. When we are finished with the areas according to our military priorities and we reach an area in which the Americans are present, I am not going to indulge in heroics and say that we will send the army to face the Americans. We are talking about a super power. Do we have the capabilities to do that? I believe that this is clear for us as Syrians. Do we choose resistance? If there is resistance, the fate of the Americans will be similar to their fate in Iraq. But the concept of resistance needs a popular state of mind that is the opposite of being agents and proxies, a patriotic popular state which carries out acts of resistance. The natural role of the state in this case is to provide all the necessary conditions and necessary support to any popular resistance against the occupier. If we put to one side the colonial and commercial American mentality which promotes the colonization of certain areas for money, oil and other resources, we must not forget that the main agents which brought the Americans, the Turks and others to this region are Syrians acting as agents of foreigners – Syrian traitors. Dealing with all the other cases is just dealing with the symptoms, while we should be addressing the causes. We should be dealing with those Syrians and try to reformulate the patriotic state of the Syrian society – to restore patriotism, restore the unity of opinion and ensure that there are no Syrian traitors. To ensure that all Syrians are patriots, and that treason is no longer a matter of opinion, a mere difference over a political issue. We should all be united against occupation. When we reach this state, I assure you that the Americans will leave on their own accord because they will have no opportunity to remain in Syria; although America is a superpower, it will not be able to remain in Syria. This is something we saw in Lebanon at a certain point and in Iraq at a later stage. I think this is the right solution.

    Journalist: Last week, you made a tour of the front lines in Idlib with which you surprised the Syrians and the world. Addressing the soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, you said that the battle is in the east, but Idlib is an advanced outpost of the enemy in the west which aims at dispersing the forces of the Syrian Army. Some saw the visit as the go-ahead sign, or the zero hour for the coming battle of Idlib. Is it so?

    President Assad: No, there was no link between my visit and the zero hour. First, I conduct tours every so often to the areas which are considered hot spots and dangerous, because these heroes are carrying out the most difficult of tasks, and it is natural for me to think of visiting them. This has been common practice for me; the visit to Idlib in particular was because the world perhaps believed that the whole Syria question is summed up in what is happening in the north, and the issue has now become a Turkish Army incursion into Syrian territory, and forgetting that all those fighting in Idlib are actually part of the Turkish Army, even though they are called al-Qaeda, Ahrar al-Sham and other names. I assure you that those fighters are closer to Erdogan’s heart than the Turkish Army itself. We should not forget this, because politically and in relation to Turkey in particular, the main battle is Idlib because it is linked to the battle in the north-eastern region or the Jazeera region. This is the reason – I wanted to stress that what is happening in the Jazeera region, despite its importance and despite the wide area of operations does not distract us from the significance of Idlib in the overall battle.

    Journalist: You say, Mr President, that there is no link between your visit to Idlib and the zero hour but is there a link between your visit to Idlib and the meeting which took place on the same day between Turkey and Russia?

    President Assad: Actually, when I was there, I had forgotten completely that a summit was being held on the same day. I did not remember that. I knew that a summit would be taking place and that it would be on Tuesday but…

    Journalist: But your statements gave the impression that it was a preemptive rejection or something against the meeting.

    President Assad: That is true.

    Journalist: Or against this meeting.

    President Assad: Some articles and comments even said that there was a feeling of anger against the summit, and that the summit was against us. The fact is that I was not angry, and my statements against Erdogan are continuous. I said that he was a thief, and from the first days he started stealing everything related to Syria. So, he is a thief. I was not calling him names; I was describing him. This is an adjective and this description is true. What do you call somebody who steals factories, crops and finally land? A benefactor? He is a thief, there is no other name. Previously in my speech before the People’s Assembly, I said that he is a political thug. He exercises this political thuggery on the largest scale. He lies to everyone, blackmails everyone. He is a hypocrite and publicly so. We are not inventing an epithet; he declares himself through his true attributes. So, I only described him

    As to the agreement, as I said a while ago, we believe that Russian involvement anywhere is in our interest, because our principles are the same and our battle is one. So, Russian involvement will certainly have positive results and we started to see a part of that. Contrary to what you said, we were happy with this summit, and we are happy with the Russian-Turkish relationship in general, contrary to what some people believe, that the Russians are appeasing the Turks. It does not matter whether the Russians are appeasing the Turks or not or whether they are playing a tactical game with them. What is important is the strategy. That is why I can say that there is no link at all between my statements and the summit.

    Journalist: Remaining with Idlib, but from a different perspective, the UN Special Envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, and in an interview with a newspaper about the situation in Idlib, described it as complicated, and I’ll mention the points he made: he called for a solution which guarantees the security of civilians. He also talked about the presence of terrorist organizations and the importance of avoiding an all-out military campaign which, in his opinion, will, far from solving the problem, have a serious humanitarian consequence. What do you think of what he said, and will the operation be postponed or stopped because of international pressure or based on Pedersen’s remarks?

    President Assad: If Pedersen has the means or the capacity to solve the problem without an all-out military operation, it will be good. Why does he not solve the problem? If he has a clear plan, we have no objection. It is very simple. He can visit Turkey and tell the Turks to convince the terrorists, or ask Turkey to separate the civilians from the militants. Let the civilians stay in one area and the militants in another. It would be even easier if he could identify who is a militant and who is not. Fighting terrorism is not achieved by theorizing, making rhetorical statements or by preaching. As for postponing, had we waited for an international decision – and by international decision I mean American, British, French and those who stand with them – we would not have liberated any region in Syria since the first days of the war. These pressures have no impact. Sometimes we factor in certain political circumstances; as I said, we give political action an opportunity so that there is no pretext, but when all these opportunities are exhausted, military action becomes necessary in order to save civilians, because I cannot save civilians when they are under the control of the militants. Western logic is an intentionally and maliciously up-side-down logic. It says that the military operation should be stopped in order to protect civilians, whilst for them the presence of civilians under the authority of terrorists constitutes a form of protection for the civilians. The opposite is actually true. The military intervention aims at protecting the civilians, by leaving civilians under the authority of terrorists you extend a service to terrorists and take part in killing civilians.

    Journalist: You are not waiting for an international decision but are you waiting for a Russian one? Can the Russians delay the beginning of the military operation? We saw earlier that military operations were stopped in Idlib, to the extent that some people said that the Russians put pressure every time to stop the operations as a result of special understandings with the Turks. Is that true?

    President Assad: “Pressure” is not the right word. We, the Russians and the Iranians are involved in the same military battle and the same political battle. We are always in talks with each other to determine the circumstances which allow for an operation to go ahead. On several occasions, we agreed on a specific timing for a certain operation, which was later postponed because of military or political developments. This dialogue is normal. There are issues we see on the internal arena, and there are issues seen by Iran on the regional arena and there are those issues seen by the Russians on the international arena. We have an integrated approach based on dialogue. In the past month, I have held five meetings with Russian and Iranian officials, so less than a week apart. Between each two meetings there were military and political developments such that what had been agreed in the first meeting was then changed or modified in the second, third and fourth meetings and the last of which was yesterday. The fast pace of developments makes it necessary sometimes to postpone operations. On the other hand, we have contacts with civilians in those areas. We really try hard to make it possible for civilians to move from those areas into our areas in order to save lives; moreover, if a political solution was possible, and sometimes we succeeded in finding such a solution, it would save the lives of Syrian soldiers, which is a priority that we should not ignore. So, there are many elements, which are difficult to go into now, which affect this decision and postpone it; it is not a matter of pressure. The Russians are as enthusiastic about fighting terrorism as we are, otherwise why would they send their fighter jets? The timing depends on dialogue.

    Journalist: But President Putin announced the end of major military operations in Syria. Would Russia be with us in Idlib? Would it take part in the military operation?

    President Assad: Russia was with us in liberating Khan Skeikhoon and its environs; announcing an end to military operations does not mean an end to fighting terrorism. Indeed, the major battles have almost finished, because most areas either surrender voluntarily or are subject to limited operations. The Khan Sheikhoon operation might look on the map as a major battle, but there was in fact a collapse on the part of the militants. So, maybe this is what was meant by the end of the major operations. Their statements that Idlib should return under the control of the Syrian state and their determination to strike at terrorism have not changed.

    Journalist: Remaining in Idlib and on the same point, because there is a lot being said about this. Concerning the terrorists in Idlib, and they are the same terrorists Pedersen talked about, how are they going to be handled? Are they going to be deported? There have been cases like this before: terrorists being deported from different regions in Syria to Idlib. Now, terrorists are in Idlib. Would the Turks accept the terrorists to be deported to Turkey, or how are they going to be dealt with?

    President Assad: If Turkey does not accept that, it is Turkey’s problem and it does not concern us. We are going to deal with them in the same way we have in the past. Some might ask: in the past there were areas to which terrorists were permitted to retreat to, but now there is no other place to which terrorists might be sent from Idlib. So, where should they go? If they do not go to Turkey, they have two options: either return to the Syrian state and resolve their issues or face war. There is no other choice, neither for us nor for them. These are the two only options.

    Journalist: Some media outlets have circulated leaks about meetings with the Turks. Is that true, on what level, and what was the outcome of those meetings, if they had taken place?

    President Assad: All those meetings were held between security officers but at different levels. Few meetings, probably two or three, were held in Kasab inside the Syrian borders or close to the joint borders, and one or more meetings were held in Russia. I do not recall the number exactly, because they took place in the space of the past two years. But there have been no real results. At least we had expected to reach a solution concerning the withdrawal agreed upon in Astana for fifteen kilometers west and north in the de-escalation zone in Idlib. It did not happen.

    Journalist: So, you confirm that there have been meetings with the Turkish side, but that was before the agreement…

    President Assad: Of course, there were tripartite meetings with Russian mediation and Russian presence. We insisted on the Russian presence because we do not trust the Turks, so that there are witnesses.

    Journalist: not bilateral meetings?

    President Assad: No, trilateral meetings.

    Journalist: Trilateral, with the Russians present? Was that before the last Russian-Turkish meeting?

    President Assad: Of course.

    Journalist: Are you prepared today to sit with the Turks after the aggression and after the agreement?

    President Assad: If you are asking me how would I feel if I, personally, had to shake hands with a person from the Erdogan group, or someone of similar leanings or who represents his ideology – I would not be honoured by such a meeting and I would feel disgusted. But we have to put our personal feelings aside when there is a national interest at stake. If a meeting would achieve results, I would say that everything done in the national interest should be done. This is the responsibility of the state. I do not expect a meeting to produce any results unless circumstances change for the Turks. And because the Erdogan-type Turks are opportunists and belong to an opportunist organization and an opportunist ideology, they will produce results according to changing circumstances, when they are under pressure, depending on their internal or external circumstances or maybe their failure in Syria. Then, they might produce results.

    Journalist: The sensitive question in this regard is: the Turks are occupiers, so if I am willing, or if I have the chance, or if I believe that I might meet the Turks, the Turks are occupiers, exactly like Israelis, so it would be possible to meet the Israelis. This is a sensitive issue, but it is being raised.

    President Assad: It was actually raised when we started these meetings: how can we meet occupiers in Afrin or other areas, even if there are not occupiers, they support terrorism; they are enemies in the national sense. The difference between them and Israel is that we do not recognize the legitimacy of its existence as a state. We don’t recognize the existence of the Israeli people. There is no Israeli people except the one that existed for several centuries BC, now they are a diaspora who came and occupied land and evicted its people. While the Turkish people exist, and they are a neighbouring people, and we have a common history, regardless of whether this history is good or bad or in between; that is irrelevant. Turkey exists as a state and it is a neighbouring state. The Alexandretta issue is different from the situation in which a people without land replace a land and a people; the comparison is not valid. Even when we negotiated with Israel in the 1990s, we did not recognize it. We negotiated in order to achieve peace. If this was achieved and the rights were returned, we would recognize it; as I said, the comparison is invalid. Turkey will continue to exist and the Turks should remain a brotherly people. Erdogan was betting at the beginning to mobilize the Turkish people behind him in order to create hostility with the Syrian people, and consequently be given a free hand. We have to be careful not to look at things in the same way. I stress again that some people, not the political forces, but within the Turkish Army and security institutions are against Erdogan. This was the reason behind our drive to meet them.

    Furthermore, and this was the subject of discussion with our Russian and Iranian friends – who said that yes, we are defending you, but in the end, you are the owners of the cause. This is true, the land is ours, and the cause is ours and so we have a duty to carry out by meeting them directly, even if we do not expect results. Maybe there will come a day when we can achieve results, particularly with changing circumstances inside Turkey, in the world and within Syria.

    Journalist: Concerning Israel, some people describe it as the absent present in the events in Syria, the greatest beneficiary of what happened in Syria. Indeed, it is more comfortable now than in any other time before in comparison with weakening Syria, Hizbollah and Iran, as analysts say.

    President Assad: It is the always-present. It has never been absent. It might be absent in terms of language, because we fight its proxies, agents, flunkies or tools, in different ways, some military some political. They are all tools serving Israel directly or through the Americans. Since the battle on the ground is with these forces, it is normal that the terminology describes these forces and not Israel. Israel is in fact a main partner in what is happening, and as an enemy state, that is expected. Will it stand by and watch? No. it will be proactive, and more effective in order to strike at Syria, the Syrian people, the Syrian homeland and everything related to Syria.

    Journalist: Benefiting practically from what happened?

    President Assad: This is self-evident. Even if we do not discuss it, it is one of our national givens in Syria.

    Journalist: After all the aggressions carried out by the Israeli enemy on Syria, we have never seen an Arab position, and the Arab League has never moved. When the Turkish aggression started, the Arab League met at the level of Foreign Ministers. The first impressions were good, and the final communique was described as positive. In return, we have not heard a statement from the Syrian state.

    President Assad: Do you recall when Syria’s membership in the Arab League was frozen? Did we issue a statement? We did not. So, if we did not issue a statement as a result of Syria’s departure from the Arab League, why would we issue one when they started discussing Syria’s return to the Arab League? I think the implications of my answer are clear for all those who want to understand. I do not think that your viewers believe that raising this issue merits more than the few sentences I have just said.

    Journalist: True. If we move to pure politics concerning the constitutional committee. What is your explanation of the criticism made by the other side to this committee, although it has been one of their demands for years?

    President Assad: Very simply, they believed that we would reject the formation of this committee, and maybe they were shocked that we were able to form it, because they used to raise obstacles and blame the Syrian government. We dealt with these obstacles in a specific diplomatic manner, not making concession on fundamental issues, but on some issues which we consider related to form. They were shocked in the end, and that is why they launched a severe attack on it. That is what happened, in brief.

    Journalist: The Syrian state made no concessions under Russian or Iranian pressure?

    President Assad: No. Had we made real concessions, they would not have attacked it. They would have praised the formation of the committee. Their attack shows that we have not made any concessions and no concessions can be made. The constitutional committee and the outcomes it might produce later would be used as a launching pad to attack and strike at the structure of the Syrian state. This is what the West has been planning for years, and we know this. That is why it was not an option to concede on fundamentals and particular stances related to Syria’s interest. There were other details which were insignificant, like the fact that they camouflaged themselves under the umbrella of the so-called moderate opposition. In many instances, they proposed names affiliated to al-Nusra Front, which we rejected because of this affiliation.

    Journalist: Terrorists?

    President Assad: They are terrorists. In the end we agreed to a number of those, which might have come as a surprise. We determined that the result would be the same regardless: the same background, the same affiliation, the same master.

    Journalist: True

    President Assad: And decision maker, and so the signal for the decision would be from the same source. So, what difference does it make?

    Journalist: Puppets, no more.

    President Assad: Exactly. We agreed. This is only an example. There are many other details, but this is what surprised them. We have not made any concession on fundamental issues.

    Journalist: Pedersen talked about meetings of the constitutional committee in Geneva saying that it would open the door to reaching a comprehensive solution to the Syrian crisis, and in his view, that solution includes holding parliamentary and presidential elections under the supervision of the United Nations and in accordance with Security Council Resolution 2254. He also talked about ensuring the participation of Syrian expatriates. Would you accept international supervision on parliamentary and presidential elections? And is this issue within the preview of this committee? And who has the right to vote, practically?

    President Assad: For him to say that this committee prepares the ground for a comprehensive solution, this is not true. It provides part of the solution, maybe. But by saying this he ignores the presence of the terrorists. A constitutional committee while the terrorists are still there will solve the problem – how? This is impossible; it is rejected. The solution starts by striking at terrorism in Syria. It starts by stopping external interference in Syria. Any Syrian-Syrian dialogue complements, contributes and plays a certain role, but it does not replace the first and second elements. I am saying this in order not to leave part of the statement as if we have agreed to it.

    If he believes that Resolution 2254 gives the authority to any party, international or otherwise, to supervise the elections, this means that they are returning to the era of the mandate. I would like to recall that the first part of the resolution refers to Syria’s sovereignty, which is expressed by the Syrian state alone and no one else. The elections that will be held will be under the supervision of the Syrian state from A to Z. If we want to invite any other party – an international body, certain states, organizations, societies, individuals or personalities, it will still be under the supervision of the Syrian state and under the sovereignty of the Syrian state. The constitutional committee has nothing to do with the elections it is only tasked with the constitution. If they believe that they will return to the days of the mandate, then that would only be in their dreams.

    Journalist: Again, on Pedersen’s statements, he said that the mere acceptance to form the constitutional committee is an implied acceptance of the other side and constitutes a joined commitment before the Syrian people to try and agree, under the auspices of the United Nations, on the constitutional arrangements for Syria. Some people objected to this implied acceptance of the other side by the committee, since it does not represent the Syrian people and is not elected by the Syrian people. What is your response to that?

    President Assad: All your questions are valid, at least from a legal perspective. First, let us identify the first party and the second; some people believe the first party is the Syrian state or the Syrian government. No, this is not the case, the first party represents the viewpoint of the Syrian government, however the Syrian government is not part of these negotiations nor of these discussions.

    Journalist: The first party is supported by the Syrian government.

    President Assad: Exactly. The government supports this party because we believe that we share the same viewpoint. They are people who belong to the same political climate of the Syrian government. This does not imply that the government is part of the negotiations. Legally, we are not a part of the constitutional committee and this does not imply the government’s recognition of any party; this issue is should be clear. So, he is referring to a side which represents the viewpoint of the Syrian government. Here we have to question: what does he mean by “implied acceptance,” what is it we are accepting?

    The first party initially accepted to be part of Sochi and to sit down with the second party in Sochi; it later accepted to set up a constitutional committee and discuss ideas regarding the constitution. Accepting to sit down with them, does not imply that we accept their nature. The first party exists in Syria, lives in Syria, belongs to all segments of the Syrian people; similarly, there is a state which has the same viewpoint, is elected by the Syrian people and enjoys the support of the majority of people. The second party is appointed by whom? It is appointed by Turkey. Why was the formation of the constitutional committee delayed? For a whole year, we have been negotiating with Turkey via the state-guarantors, Russia and Iran. The second party was not appointed by any Syrian side; a few represent the terrorists and the majority represent the states which imposed them; it is exclusively Turkey, and of course those standing in the background, the Americans and others. And there is the other party, which, as I said, represents the terrorists. So, what is it I am accepting? I accept the terrorist to be a patriot, or I accept those appointed by others, or I accept agents to be patriots. Let us speak frankly. Why should we lie and speak diplomatically? The reality is that there is a patriotic party dealing with a party which is an agent and a terrorist, its as simple as that. But in order to be diplomatic and to not anger everyone, I will call it a Syrian-Syrian dialogue, but only in terms of an identity card, passport and nationality. But as for belonging, that is a different discussion, to which we all know the answer too aside from the diplomatic discourse.

    Journalist: Pedersen considered that the launch of the work of the committee is actually a return to Geneva. Have we returned to Geneva after four years? And what about Sochi and Astana?

    President Assad: No, we have returned to Geneva only geographically, whereas politically, we are part of Sochi, and everything that is happening has its frame of reference as Sochi and is a continuation of it. There is no Geneva, it is not part of this process. The fact that the UN is represented and participates in Sochi gives it an international dimension, which is necessary; but it does not mean that Geneva undercuts Sochi. There is no Geneva.

    Journalist: Could Pedersen’s statements, all the statements we have reviewed here, aim at preempting the work of the committee, or are they completely outside the context of its work? And concerning the constitution, in particular, is what is happening a complete change of the constitution, a discussion on the constitution, or the amendment of some provisions of the constitution?

    President Assad: There will be an attempt to direct the work of the committee in a certain direction. This is for sure, and we are fully aware of this and won’t allow it. That is why everything announced outside the committee has no value; it is absolute zero, as simple as that. Therefore, we should not waste our time on such statements or give it any importance. What is the second point?

    Journalist: About the nature of the committee’s work: is it discussing the provisions of the constitution, amending some provisions or a complete change of the constitution?

    President Assad: This constitutes a large part of the discussion on setting up the constitutional committee: shall we amend the constitution or have a new constitution? Our position was that when we amend a provision of the constitution and put it to a referendum, it becomes a new constitution. So, there is no real difference between amending the constitution or having a new one, because there is nothing to define the new constitution, a completely new constitution. This is all theoretical and has no real meaning. What concerns us is that everything produced by the meetings of this committee and is in line with national interest – even if it is a new constitution from A to Z, we shall approve. And if there is an amendment of a single provision in the constitution, which is against national interest, we would oppose it. So, in order not to waste our time in such sophistry, we should focus on the implications. We are fully aware of the game they are going to play. They aim to weaken the state and transform it into a state which cannot be controlled from within and, consequently is controlled from the outside. The game is clear, as is happening in neighboring countries which we don’t need to mention. This is not going to happen; but they will try and we will not accept. This is the summary of months of future dialogue, and maybe longer, I don’t know. Of course, I mean future dialogue.

    Journalist: We discussed at length the constitutional committee and all the statements made about it. I will move to talking about the internal situation in Syria, since we are talking about attempts to influence, what matters is the internal situation. During the war years, the Syrian’s suffered from high prices, lack of production, shortage of job opportunities, many consequences of terrorism, the sanctions, and the difficult military situation over large parts of the Syrian territory. The natural outcome was a deterioration in the living conditions of Syrian families. But now, conditions on the ground militarily have improved, most of the land has returned to the control of the Syrian state. What about the living conditions? Are there signs of an improvement of this situation, or will the situation remain as it is until all Syrian territory is liberated?

    President Assad: If the cause was only due to the situation on the ground, terrorism, etc., then yes, it is better to wait. But this does not make sense. As you know, some people tend to blame everything on the security situation and whilst there is no doubt that it has a great impact, but it is not absolute. This answers the last part of the question. Do we wait? No, because if we were to wait, even if the situation on the ground changed, living conditions would not improve. Living conditions will not improve unless we move, very simply, as a state and as a society on all levels. Liberating some areas might have an impact on the economic situation if these areas were employed and integrated into the development and economic cycle in Syria.

    Journalist: Areas in which there are resources in particular.

    President Assad: There might be resources, or it might be a tourist area. Currently there is no tourism, so this area will not have an impact on the economic situation, but an agricultural area like the northern regions, this is essential; today we import some of the things which we used to export and because they are imported in a round-about way in order to circumvent the sanctions, we are paying more for them. If we take Aleppo for instance, it is the heart of Syrian industry, and with Damascus they are the centre of the Syrian economy. So, areas are different but if we liberate areas without taking the necessary measures to invigorate the economy, things will not improve. So, as a state, we need to accelerate the rebuilding of infrastructure – like restoring electricity and other utilities, and the role of state institutions, in order to facilitate the return of the productivity cycle. Here I am not referring to major industries and large projects. Even before the war, we had the view that large projects are important but they are not the solution. For a country like Syria, the strength of its economy lies in small and medium-sized enterprises. This will help invigorate the economy. The problem is that some people wait; they say that let us wait to see what happens. If we are to wait, then we should not expect to see the signs that you referred to. Are there signs? Yes, of course, there are improvements, there are industries which have emerged, workshops that have returned to work. The number of people who have returned to the country is higher than the development of the economy, and consequently some might say these improvements are intangible, this is correct. The challenge now is to integrate these people into the economic cycle. The answer to the question: (can we do it?) of course, we can. We should not say that circumstances prevent us, no; we have some laziness, we have some dependencies and sometimes we do not have the vision of how to move. And by we, I mean all of us as a society, as a state and as citizens. The state is responsible to provide the necessary conditions and the infrastructure, but it cannot open all the shops, workshops, and industries.

    Journalist: If we can, why do we not see a real response by the government to your continued directives to the ministers to deal transparently with the citizens. Why is this indifference and improvisation in the work of government institutions and the absence of any planning or a preemptive alternative, as some people say, some people who hold the government responsible directly for squandering the blood of the martyrs and the wounded and the sacrifices of the Syrians.

    President Assad: First, if we want to address government institutions, and in order to be objective, I cannot talk about them collectively; there are those ministries that are working, while there is laziness and inefficiency in others. Within ministries, there are institutions which are functioning properly and others which are not fulfilling their duties. So, if we want to talk objectively, we need to identify specific sectors in order to distinguish between them; any generalities do not properly reflect reality. In our own private discussions, we can talk in general terms – the state is not functioning, the government is not functioning etc., but I am an official and I cannot but speak in a scientific, objective and tangible manner. In reality, there are cases of negligence and there is the opposite. If I look at the positive aspects, if all the institutions are not working, where are we getting salaries from? How do students go to school? There are martyrs in the education and electricity sectors. Electricity plants were targeted and then problems solved and solutions found. Despite the difficulties due to the sanctions, we are able to provide basic commodities like oil, wheat and others. So, there is work being done. Of course, you will tell me that it is only normal for talk about pain. This is natural and I do not expect people to refer to the positives. It is human nature to talk about pain. When I am healthy, I do not talk about being in good health every day, but when I’m sick, I will talk about my illness; again, this is only natural. But in order to evaluate properly the situation we should consider all angles. As to the negatives, the challenge lies in distinguishing between causes related to the crisis and the war and causes related to our dereliction? When people criticize the state, they speak as if there is no war. Similarly, when an official speaks, they often blame everything on the war; the challenge is how to separate the two. This is what we are doing now. When we had the gasoline and diesel crisis, the problem was indeed caused by the sanctions and our ability to provide these resources. The problem is that the state itself is under sanction, so it cannot import. It imports using other channels, which I won’t divulge, to source these resources. Most of the time we succeed, but other times we do not; these latter cases are beyond our control. As for electricity, the plants and infrastructure are continuously targeted, do we hold the officials responsible for the terrorist rockets? We need to be objective about certain issues, for example we were able to reclaim some gas wells, which improved the electricity situation, but the needs of the returnees and the workshops which have reopened are much larger than the electricity we were able to restore. We need to see all these issues. So, we are able to produce, but we go back to the same question: how do we distinguish between dereliction and valid causes. This is what we should be considering, but we are not discussing the situation from this perspective. At the level of the state, we are trying to reach these results, and we have been able to reach them in relation to dereliction. Officials who do not fulfill their duties should be removed; dereliction should not be given an opportunity to continue. There is also the issue of corruption. Dereliction of duty is one thing and corruption is something else. The outcome may be the same sometimes, but here I am referring to an official who is not corrupt but is either unable to carry out their duty or does not have a clear vision. When it becomes apparent that they do not have either of these qualities, then they should leave immediately.

    Journalist: On this subject of having a clear vision, if we talk about the rate of exchange for the dollar, it is logical that during the war the exchange rate increases if not as a result of the war itself, as a result of the embargo and the economic sanctions on our country, but recently rises are incomprehensible and affect the details of the daily life. What is your explanation of this incomprehensible rise?

    President Assad: As I said some issues are self-evident, first, sanctions have an impact on state revenues in dollars or hard currency in general. This affects the exchange rate, which in turn affects prices. State revenues have also receded as a result of fewer exports and the lack of tourism; no tourists will visit a country during a war. Countries that we depend on for exports are contributing to the sanctions in one way or another. Nonetheless, we have managed to identify unofficial channels for exports, which has contributed to the inflow some hard currency. There is also the speculation game, some of which happens inside Syria and some of which happens outside; additionally, there is speculation on social media, which we get dragged into.

    The most dangerous of these factors is the psychological. When we hear that the Syrian pound has dropped, we rush to buy dollars. We believe in this way that we have saved money by turning our pounds into dollars, but as a consequence, the exchange rate drops in a severe and accelerated manner and consequently prices rise significantly; what citizens have saved by converting pounds to dollars they have lost due to higher prices. There are many aspects to this issue. Now, can the state intervene? Yes it can, but with limited revenues and tremendous demand – due to higher prices of basic commodities like wheat, oil, fuel and others, there is a trade off between exhausting dollars on speculation or spending on basic needs. If dollars are exhausted, this will mean we will have no wheat and oil; this is our reality. Our revenues are not what they used to be and as such our priorities have been on focused on arms and ammunition and squeezing what we can in order to provide the necessary weapons.

    Journalist: Are there no measures that the state can take to control the rate of the exchange?

    President Assad: Of course, there are. If you compare our situation with other countries in our region, when the dollar exchange rate is affected, you find that it increases multiple times in a matter of days. So, it is a miracle that the exchange rate, which was in the upper forties or fifties before the war, is still around s

  49. IsraHell November 1, 2019 @ 9:06 pm

    Posted on 2019/10/29

    Robert Steele: Fake Raid? Abu Mohammad Salama Killed? Did Zionists & Kurds Schlong President Donald Trump? Zionist Strike 52!

    04 Inter-State Conflict, 05 Civil War, 07 Other Atrocities, 08 Wild Cards, 09 Terrorism, 10 Transnational Crime, Corruption, Government, IO Deeds of Peace, Military, Officers Call, Peace Intelligence

    Q. Within minutes of President Donald Trump’s announcement of an alleged raid that allegedly killed an alleged ISIS leader known as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, skeptical commentary emerged. What is your summary appreciation?

    A. Let me begin by saying that people I trust tell me that the raid was very real, with helicopters flying 50 feet above the ground at 130 knots. The cost of the raid has been estimated at $30 million. What does not appear to be real are the actual location, and the alleged target.

    I am among those who denounced the fake Bin Ladens including the last one provided by the Pakistani military as a gift to help Barack Obama win re-election. We sent men to their death for political theater.

    I knew immediately that this latest alleged raid was a fake, but chose to start with a headline, “Russia says Baghdadi killing faked by US [& Israel],” credited to Gordon Duff, founding editor of Veterans Today.

    Gordon, whom I know personally, has a rich network of contacts on the ground, including Russian military commanders as well as honest Jews who despise Zionist provocations and lies. The official Russian denunciation of the raid as having never happened is a matter of record.

    To that I add the earlier reported death of Al-Baghdadi in 2015 in an Israeli hospital, and the alleged but credible aspect of al-Baghdadi being a Mossad operative and Israeli citizen named Elliot Shimon, and you have the perfect storm. I believe the Zionists and the US neo-conservative lied to President Donald Trump, faked the entire raid, faked the alleged DNA testing, and have now put the President in a terrible spot.


    Posted on 2019/11/01

    TruNews: Baghdadi Dead AGAIN? Unbelievable
    Peace Intelligence


  50. JESUS IS NEAR November 1, 2019 @ 9:07 pm

    I can’t believe it!

    I just walked through the local supermarket, making it a point to search out the infamous encircled “U”, PAREV, or “K” in a triangle.

    Just about every item I looked at was demonized with the Mark of The Beast stamp – even bottled water. Bottled water folks!

    Ha – Yea But they still just can’t seem to “kosher” a marshmallow so we still have Rocky Road ice cream that’s evil jew free :),

  51. Rick November 1, 2019 @ 9:21 pm

    Who is Behind Gun Control?

    Most U.S. Federal gun control legislation has been written, introduced, and sponsored by Jewish Congressmen and Jewish Senators.

    U.S. Federal Gun Control Legislation, 1968 – present

    1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Congressman Emanuel Celler’s House bill H.R.17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jewish Senator Thomas Dodd. America’s biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew.

    1988: Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.1523. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.

    1988: Senator Howard Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill – S.2180 – to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called “plastic guns.”

    1990: Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.

    1993: Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.653. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.

    February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Senator Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Congressman Charles Schumer.

    1994: Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.” Congressman Charles Schumer sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Senator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Charles Schumer.

    1995: Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.

    September, 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.

    1997: Senate bill S.54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senator Hatch, among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.

    January, 1999: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.

    January, 1999: Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.

    February,1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.

    February, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.

    March, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999.

    March, 1999: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.

    May, 2000: Senators Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Schumer sponsor Senate bill S.2515, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.

    January, 2001: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer sponsor Senate bill S.25, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].

    May, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer, and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban expired in September, 2004.

    October, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin, and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

    March, 2005: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.

    March, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.620, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.

    July, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1621 – Fifty-Caliber Sniper Weapons. This amendment would convert all .50 BMG firearms to NFA weapons.

    July, 2005: Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1622 – Fifty-Caliber Exclusion to S.397. This amendment would modify S.397 to allow suits when the firearm involved was a .50 caliber weapon.

    July, 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1633 – BATFE Safety Standards. This amendment allows law suits to continue/be brought if the product did not meet the safety standards as defined by the BATFE.

    July, 2005: Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1634 – ‘Sporting Use’ on Domestic Handguns. Applying ’sporting use’ clause requirements to domestic handguns could, almost completely, dry up the handgun availability in the United States.


    Emanuel Celler (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Representative from New York(1923 – 1973)

    Howard M. Metzenbaum (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from Ohio(1974, 1976 – 1995)

    Carl M. Levin (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from Michigan(1979 – present)

    Thomas P. “Tom” Lantos (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Representative from California(1981 – 2008)

    Arlen Specter (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from Pennsylvania(1981 – present)

    Charles E. “Chuck” Schumer (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from New York(1999 – present), Democratic Represenative from New York(1981-1999)

    Frank R. Lautenberg (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from New Jersey(1982 – 2001, 2003 – present)

    Barbara L. Boxer (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from California(1993 – present), Democratic Representative from California(1983 – 1993)

    Herbert H. “Herb” Kohl (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from Wisconsin(1989 – present)

    Dianne G. Feinstein (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Senator from California(1992 – present)

    Jerrold L. Nadler (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Representative from New York(1992 – present)

    Steven R. “Steve” Rothman (Ashkenazi Jew), Democratic Representative from New Jersey(1997 – present)

  52. IsraHell November 1, 2019 @ 9:27 pm

    US Army not ready to attack Russia and China

    The rash actions of the Pentagon may end in disaster. The Pentagon is developing plans for an armed invasion in Russia and China, foreign media reports.

    Specifically, we are talking about Taiwan, the Far East and the Crimea. “The American army today has the opportunity to quickly strike anywhere in the world, ” the journalists write.

    However, for some reason no one takes into account the fact that in the case of horizontal escalation (military operations in adjacent regions), it is the States that will suffer the most.

    We are talking about both military losses and economic losses. For example, in China, the United States has a huge number of branches of corporations, including the military industry, not to mention financial investments.

    Moreover, the US Army is not really ready for an attack on the Russian Federation and China.

    At the borders of countries, advanced military developments are unfolding. So the S-400 air defense system is by far the best air defense system, which will simply negate a possible air attack by the enemy.

    In the near future, the deployment of Container radar is planned. This latest-generation system is capable of capturing and tracking simultaneously up to 5,000 enemy missiles at a distance of 900 to 3,000 thousand kilometers. Such a range allows the system to be located in the interior of the country and to ensure security for neighboring countries.

    Also on October 30, a Bulava missile was successfully launched from the Prince Vladimir submarine of the Borey-A class. The submarine was underwater. This “show of strength” also shows Russia’s readiness for a possible war.

    Now in service are 4 submarines of the Borey class, which can “suddenly appear off the coast of America and inflict a crushing blow.” It is separately noted that in the event of any open military operations by the United States, the probability of a nuclear war tends to 100%.


  53. IsraHell November 1, 2019 @ 10:31 pm

    Today on TruNews we welcome Dr. Chuck Baldwin, Pastor of Liberty Fellowship church in Kalispell, Montana, to discuss the heresy of Christian Zionism and how that blasphemous and zealous doctrine, which has deceived many evangelicals, is actually uniting true believers in Jesus Christ.

    Rick Wiles, Chuck Baldwin. Air date: 10/29/2019.

  54. JESUS IS NEAR November 2, 2019 @ 11:18 am

    Hi Rick!

    I appreciate your write up! Yes – it is true!

    The jew believes ONLY they and the U.S. military fighting their wars should have the ability to posses firearms. I especially like that you included the Lautenberg Amendment MCDV!

    Most people don’t know of this law snuck through Congress hidden inside a 3K pg. Fed Appr. Bill that no one was going to vote against, and therefore no one took the time to read it. Sounds just like the jew shill Piglosi saying – “You have to pass it to see what’s inside it”!

    With the Lautenberg Amendment, many, MANY people have been federally banned from gun’s for the slightest touching, spitting, even throwing something that didn’t even hit your “spouse”, BUT the jew doesn’t stop there. He has even tried to muddy up the water to include “dating” relationships too = DESPICABLE!

    Jew ridden SCOTUS Justices RBG, Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer have even included it to mean “misplaced anger”!

    This not only effects men, but women who probably would need that firearm protection even more so than a man in most instances.

    The jew is the unravelling knot of mankind! Created by Satan himself to infect GOD ALMIGHTY’s children any way he can!

  55. KathJuliane November 2, 2019 @ 12:37 pm

    Daily Caller: ‘Do You Think That Hurts You?’: Chris Cuomo Presses Adam Schiff On Lack Of Witnesses Who Say Trump Committed A ‘Crime’

    October 31, 2019
    11:29 PM ET

    CNN anchor Chris Cuomo pressed California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff about the lack of impeachment inquiry witnesses overtly claiming that President Donald Trump committed a crime.

    The Thursday night “Cuomo Prime Time” conversation came after Timothy Morrison, White House senior director for European affairs, testified in hearings that he did not believe “anything illegal” occurred during the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

    After Schiff stated his belief that Trump considered himself “above the law” with “no accountability,” Cuomo pointed out the fact that, other than “I guess” Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony, no other witnesses seemed to consider Trump’s actions on the call illegal or an abuse of power, though many have expressed dissatisfaction in other ways.

    “Do you think that hurts you?” Cuomo asked. “Because it certainly bolsters the courage of Republicans to say, even Mr. Morrison today, ‘yeah, they all saw it for what it was but they didn’t think it was a crime.’”

    “You know, Chris, I can’t go into the substance of the testimony,” Schiff responded.

    “I wouldn’t agree with the general characterization you’ve made of it, but you’ll have the opportunity to read the transcripts very soon for yourself and decide what does the evidence show.” (RELATED: CNN’s Cuomo Eats Crow After Slamming Analyst Who Suggested Schiff Had Whistleblower Complaint In Advance)

    Despite there being “differences between the witnesses and their opinions” and “recollections,” Schiff stated that he believes there is a “consistent narrative here about what took place.” He then called on the American people to “make their own judgment” when they hear from the “witnesses directly.”

  56. KathJuliane November 2, 2019 @ 1:19 pm

    If Americans Knew: Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk Insults USS Liberty Survivors


    Charlie Kirk founded “Turning Point USA,” which claims to advocate policies associated with the conservative side of the political spectrum. Kirk recently insulted USS Liberty veterans, one of the most decorated crews in U.S. Navy history.

    Joe Meadors, a survivor of Israel’s lethal attack on the USS Liberty, writes: “I hope others in Kirk’s organization or who share his political dogma don’t share his public disdain for American servicemen whose only crime is to be victims of Israeli War Crimes.”

    October 29, 2019

    Mr. Charlie Kirk, Founder
    Turning Point USA
    4940 East Beverly Road
    Phoenix, Arizona 85044

    Dear Mr. Kirk:

    In the video above you condemned as “Conspiracy Theorists” the officers and crew of the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) who survived the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on our ship.

    Since the term is only used as a pejorative, since nothing could be further from the truth, and since your use of the term is a direct insult to the sacrifice of 34 of our shipmates, the effort of those of us who survived the attack and the suffering of the families of our fallen shipmates, I am compelled to write.

    Mr. Kirk, over 52 years ago our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” attacked us without warning and without provocation while we were steaming in international waters on a lawful mission for the United States.

    Over 52 years ago military elements belonging to our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” jammed our radios on both US Navy tactical and international maritime distress frequencies.

    Over 52 years ago unmarked aircraft belonging to our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” attacked us without warning.

    Over 52 years fighter aircraft from our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” reported the correct nationality of the USS Liberty to their headquarters only to be told to begin their attack.

    Over 52 years ago The White House ordered the Sixth Fleet to abandon us while we were still under attack by our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” and calling for help.

    Over 52 years ago attacking elements of our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East” departed the scene immediately after they ceased hostilities only to return 90 minutes later in an obvious attempt to claim they were coming to our help to drive off the forces attacking our ship.

    Over 52 years ago the Commander in Chief, US Naval Forces Europe (CINCUSNAVEUR) ADM John S. McCain, Jr., signed a qualified endorsement to a US Navy Court of Inquiry Report that his Legal Advisor, Capt. Merlin Staring, recommend he not sign since it was replete with many gross errors.

    Over 52 years ago the attack on the USS Liberty became the only attack on a US Navy ship since the end of World War II NOT to be the subject of a US government investigation. A mark that stands today despite the attacks on the USS Pueblo, USS Stark, and USS Cole all of which have been investigated by the US government. Likewise, the USS Vincennes incident and the bombing of the US Marine Barracks in Beirut have been investigated by the US government. Not so the attack on the USS Liberty.

    For over 52 years USS Liberty survivors, our families and the families of our fallen shipmates have been waiting for the announcement that the US government has finally decided to investigate the attack on the USS Liberty.

    Instead of being outraged at learning these facts about the attack on our ship as most patriotic Americans are, Mr. Kirk dismisses them as the rantings of a group of “Conspiracy Theorists.”

    These are not baseless mutterings of a group of anti-Semitic bigots. Mr. Kirk.

    These are proven facts being lived by the victims of Israeli War Crimes that were committed with the tacit approval and active participation of the United States government.

    You can read them for yourself.

    But you won’t. Said simply, you don’t give a damn about us. You don’t give a damn about the facts of the attack on our ship.

    Your concern — and the concern of your audience — is for the forces who attacked us. For those who killed 34 of our shipmates.

    34 Americans — like you.

    34 Patriotic Americans — unlike you.

    You’re in good company, Mr. Kirk.

    That is the same concern repeatedly expressed by every Member of Congress for over 52 years.

    What you will do is stand behind your microphone and insult the sacrifice of 34 Americans who were killed during the attack on the USS Liberty, the suffering of their families, and the effort of the survivors of the USS Liberty attack to ensure that attack is finally investigated by the US government.

    We’re open to an apology from you, Mr. Kirk. But only if that apology is followed by a public and ongoing effort from you and your organization to ensure the US government conducts the investigation that has been denied the attack on the USS Liberty for over 52 years.

    My email address is joe [at]

    We hope you will agree that it was improper for you to single out a military unit for condemnation simply because we were attacked by our “best friend and only ally in the Middle East.”


    Joe Meadors, USS Liberty Survivor
    Director of Operations
    USS Liberty Veterans Association
    P.O. Box 689275
    Marietta, GA 30068

    Joe Meadors was a signalman on the bridge of the USS Liberty during the attack. He and Francis Brown hauled up a second American Flag after the steaming colors were shot down early in the air attack. That flag can be seen here. Meadors was on the bridge throughout the attack and was one of several eyewitnesses to the machine-gunning of the life rafts.

    Kirk’s “information” about Israel comes from two short trips he took to Israel that were sponsored by Israel.

  57. Citizenfitz November 2, 2019 @ 8:09 pm

    @KJ, regarding Turning Point USA:

    The letter from Joe Meadors to TPUSA’s president, Charlie Kirk was very illustrative of the situation in America 2019.

    Anyone with an IQ in triple digits can unravel the tangle of lies that have surrounded the USS Liberty incident in a short afternoon. But, by definition, half the public is below average in intelligence. And THOSE are the ones Jewry focuses on.

    Nothing resembling justice for the USS Liberty sailors will happen in this life. The great perverter of justice and his people are running the show.

    Looking at TPUSA’s funding and organization one sees the name Bernie Marcus. Marcus is Jewish. The billionaire co-founder and former CEO of Home Depot. Home Depot is a proud sponsor of The Gay Games and other queer initiatives.

    TPUSA may be a false front operation of Jewry, to discredit conservatives. It may be a judas goat operation – to lead conservatives down dead end roads. Like the Tea Party. Maybe it’s both… or more.

    Whatever the case may be, whenever you hear someone crying “conspiracy theory” you can be 100% certain that in some form they’re in the pay of the Tribe.

  58. Humpty-dumpty November 3, 2019 @ 1:00 pm

    Wars for Israel, Mass Immigration, Sodomy: Republican Boy-Wonder Charlie Kirk Gives the People What They Want

    Some info on this fake conservative organization T.P.U.S.A.

  59. The Elder of Zyklon-B November 3, 2019 @ 1:26 pm

    TUPSA MAY be false front?

    No doubt about it Citizenfitz.

    Congressman Dan Crenshaw is Going to be at Texas A&M with TPUSA on Monday November 4th. No problem there keeping those forever gung-ho Aggies on board for more wars for Israhell and Lucifer’s chosen ones.

    These kosher clowns are there to suck in the gullible youth who call themselves “conservatives” and keep them firmly with the corral of talmudic mind management. Can’t afford to let them be subjected to truth from the likes of Kapner’s work.

    TPUSA is bound to show up sometime as well at a Southern Baptist convention I would think.

    I heard it again this morning in yet one more rural Baptist synagogue….I mean church.

    More Cyrus Scofield dipensational, rapture ranger BS which all Baptist preachers must be required to regurgitate in order to be ordained water boys for Zionist Jewry.

    It is pure apostasy. Brother Nathanael was right when he said that these evangelical preachers don’t know Holy Writ.

  60. KathJuliane November 3, 2019 @ 2:03 pm

    Everything is going just fine in the United Vassal States of Israel … Land of the Thieves And Home of the Knaves.


    American Herald Tribune: Phil Giraldi: Protesting Israel Is a “Hate Crime” in U.S. Universities

    President Trump’s Education Department now says that protesting Israel is a “hate crime.”

    Incredibly many colleges and universities are bowing to pressure to limit activities of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement.

    American Herald Tribune: Phil Giraldi: Killing Julian Assange: Justice Denied When Exposing Official Wrongdoing

    The hideous treatment of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange continues and many observers are citing his case as being symptomatic of developing “police state” tendencies in both the United States and in Europe, where rule of law is being subordinated to political expediency.


    American Herald Tribune: Joe Emersberger: Max Blumenthal Arrest Exposes Hypocrisy of Western Media and ‘Human Rights’ NGOs

    Grayzone editor Max Blumenthal, a prominent journalistic critic of US policy toward Venezuela, was arrested by DC police on Friday, October 25, in connection with a protest at the Venezuelan embassy, and held incommunicado. But if you rely on corporate media, or even leading “press freedom” groups, you haven’t heard about this troubling encroachment on freedom of the press.

  61. rule of war November 3, 2019 @ 8:15 pm


    Kikes would like nothing more than for the “nations,” Arabia and Persia, Russia, China and America to annihilate each other, so that they, the “self-chosen,” can “inherit” what they, according to their Talmud, claim is their god-given patrimony.

  62. B November 4, 2019 @ 1:03 am

    Let’s help Israel to honor the Holocaust by renaming it the Holycost.

    The question should be asked, why Israel and the Jews are so attached to the Holycost, and also the question should be asked, how it is that Israel would never have come under today’s Jewish Zionst control without the Holycost.

    Most Jews and most people are not aware that the Zionists were only a small minority of all the Jews before 1933, because the Jews were doing very well, and most Jews considered the Zionist goals ridiculous.

    Before 1933 the Zionsts could not motivate enough Jews to want to stay in the land of today’s Israel, in order for the Jews to ever take over the total control of Israel.

    Before 1933 Israel was a barren land with no infrastructure.

    It was the 1933 Zionist sponsored Jewish declared war against Germany by a worldwide boycott, and the later Transfer Agreement with Germany, that first brought infrastructure to Israel.

    It was the Holycost that caused the majority of all the Jews to be Zionist.

  63. CHRIST IS NEAR November 4, 2019 @ 8:12 pm

    Maybe we can look at this from a wider perspective.

    It’s my little rant, but – It’s been over 70+ years since the holoco$t “occurred.” I find it strange that if some wish to remove themselves from pain – why do they continue to relive it?

    It’s losing so much traction nowadays anyway.

    Like their shame of slavery that the jews LOVE to pin on us – ANY of us. Heck, I wasn’t even alive back then, OR for the holoco$t, yet we must all be reminded on a daily that this must NEVER be repeated.

    What do they mean – like more than once a day. People DON’T care. You CAN’T force people to care. They have their own minds.

    Blackface, which was used for comical reasons in late 1800’s, now it’s a “law” that musn’t be broken. Does that include face camo like we use in the Army?

    NO – It as is the holoco$t, a jew PUSHED reminder to continue the pain/suffering/embarrassment – then shame & the merry goes round, all the while the sinister worms chuckle – They have to!

    That’s their motivator – their lot in life – laughing. Ever notice how the majority of libby worms/jews ALWAYS smile — always.

    Does the jew want to destroy CHRISTIANITY in the world? YES – but not all of it. They must leave enough to keep reminding us that they are “their” god’s chosen ones. All These stupid ideas are wastes of life/time/money.

    It won’t sustain itself. But that’s where the millennial yidiots philosopher are fare game.

    He who builds their houses on the sand have only a short time to enjoy them. Ones who build their strife/life on lies has only invested in a failing future. They slip further down the well to Hell.

  64. Brother Nathanael November 4, 2019 @ 9:26 pm

    New Vid tomorrow!

    Hope to post in afternoon. Stay tuned! +bn

  65. Brother Nathanael November 4, 2019 @ 9:56 pm

    Rand Paul At Ttump Rally –
    ‘Media, Do Your Job & Print The Name Of Whistleblower’

  66. CHRIST IS NEAR November 5, 2019 @ 7:37 pm

    Adonde el “Whistleblower”? :/

    Will be sending some sheckles later in the week +BN.

  67. kristi bentz November 20, 2019 @ 1:57 pm

    Hey Brother,

    You have lost your ability to read the times.

    This is ALL planned “opposition.” Really? Do you think Americans really influence the “vote”?

    Ha! Trump is the “king” of the Jews. He does whatever he is told.

    In order to get him re-elected, the Democratic Party has to be totally decimated or at the very least, so villainized not even a loyal Democrat would vote for the Democratic nominee or given a choice of nominees not even a monkey would vote for.

    They are now trying to paint the Democratic Party as anti-Semites, controlled opposition.

    Wow, I didn’t think you would be duped by the apostate Jews.

    Guess I was wrong! I know, you won’t post this…but at least you read it.

Leave a comment