Trump’s UN Freak Show Featuring Haley & McMaster!
Brother Nathanael Channel, BroVids
Trump’s UN Freak Show
Featuring Haley & McMaster!
September 26, 2017 ©
MORE: Trump Fights Israel’s War On Iran Here
Who’s Pushing War With North Korea? Here
Trump’s Jews And Generals Here
An America-First Syria Policy Here
America’s Two Minutes Of Hate Here
America First Or Israel First? Here
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459
Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
Scroll Down For Comments
Brother Nathanael @ September 26, 2017
Text –Text– Text
Trump’s UN Freak Show Featuring Haley & McMaster!
By Brother Nathanael
Everyone loves a circus!
Lions, elephants, and dancing bears stir the senses.
But when DC hacks do the opening act, the freak show moves to center stage.
[Clip: “The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea. Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime. The United States is ready, willing and able…”]
Oh you better believe the US is willing to inflict mass destruction.
Just ask the people of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen.
No one, especially ‘Rocket Man,’ wants to be next.
Aware that his country was leveled by US bombs, wiping out over 20% of its population in the Korean War, Kim knows that ‘nuclear deterrence’ is the best defense.
Yet a country willing to forego nuclear weapons is still named a villain.
[Clip: “The Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy. It has turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos.”]
Sounds like America.
But Iran hasn’t waged any aggressive wars in 300 years.
Neither has it threatened the American people
(political slogans don’t count) or attacked Israel.
Yet Iran’s helping Syria destroy ISIS, something America’s loath to do.
But Trump wants to dump the Iran Nuke Deal. He’s made his ‘decision.’
[Clip: “I know what the decision is, but, but when the president reveals that, when he talks about it, he’ll place it in context of the broader approach to Iran, and what we have to do as a nation to protect our people but what we have to do with our allies and partners to really prevent Iran from continuing this very destabilizing behavior, this threat to Israel…”]
There it is…it’s about Israel.
It’s about pleasing the Jewish Lobby which has DC in a vice grip.
And the twit who shills for Israel…
[Clip: “The UN has bullied Israel for a very long time. And we’re not going to let that happen anymore.”]
…is the stupidest ring mistress of them all.
[Clip: “America’s UN Ambassador, Nikki Haley, Ambassador Haley thank you for joining us this morning. You’ve heard some of that reaction to the President’s speech yesterday, especially those words about North Korea, the people John quoted right there, the European foreign minister — the European Union’s foreign minister said ‘We never talk about destroying countries.’ How do you respond to that?”
“Well I think what you saw yesterday from the president was he was being honest.”]
Brilliant! Murderous, but honest about it!
You wouldn’t want Haley as your defense lawyer if you were ever charged with criminal behavior.
[Clip: “And on the issue of Iran, the Iran nuclear agreement, is the president prepared to break that agreement, even if our European allies say we shouldn’t?”
“I think the President’s just looking at the situation. And what he sees is that while one part of the nuclear deal is what everybody seems to talk about, the other side of US law says that Iran is actually in violation of ballistic missile testing…”]
‘US law?’ Iran obey ‘US law?’
When did Iran become the 51st State? I thought that was Israel.
We’re dealing with a real dingbat here posing as a US ambassador. No wonder America’s going down the tubes.
And let me remind this gal, Iran’s ballistic missiles are not under ‘US law,’ neither is it part of the Nuclear Deal.
Iran has the right to defend itself, especially after watching its neighbors fall victim to US aggression.
North Korea was watching too.
It’s a US freak show at the UN and beyond.
And the Ring Master?
The Jewish Lobby that whips all the DC clowns into line.
Watch This NEW Video Worldwide & In All EU Countries CENSOR FREE:
“Trump’s UN Freak Show Featuring Haley & McMaster!” @
This is my STATE-OF-THE-ART Video Platform AND I OWN It! It Bypasses ALL Jew-Censorship.
ALL Jew-Ruled EU Countries Can NOW View ALL My Vids Without JEW-CENSORSHIP! @
Dear Real Jew News Family,
If you like my Articles AND Videos please help me continue.
This is a CRUCIAL time in the world and we CAN make an IMPACT together.
Let’s keep the fight alive!
Donate by Click and Pledge @
MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856
God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael
PS Special Thanks to Raymond B (praying for you via your request)
AND:”Keep Up The Good Work!” (always praying for you…)
EXTREMELY URGENT APPEAL
VERY FEW are donating to my online ministry.
On September 5th I turned 67 years old. I am now ‘pushing 70.’
I thought by now my financial troubles would be over. They are not. They are worse than ever.
PayPISS banned me back in March. I have not recovered from this HUGE blow to my funding.
At least 100 people were donating on a “monthly recurring” basis on the PayPISS venue.
This came to an END when the Jew, Daniel Schulman, owner of PayPISS, banned me.
Only a handful resumed their monthly-recurring donations on my Click&Pledge donation venue.
Here are some of the things I have to pay for:
* Three Sophisticated Dedicated Servers; Lite Speed Software for all my Websites; Bandwidth for Comments Section; Webmaster; Computer Tech;
* Sophisticated Anti-Hacking Software; News Service Subscriptions; Multiple Domain Names to Prevent Pirating;
* Four Web Sites: Real Jew News; The Brother Nathanael Foundation; BroVids.com; The Brother Nathanael Channel, which is my own Video Platform; Leasing Adobe Video Software;
* Research Materials; Special Projects; Sophisticated Software for Video editing (monthly leasing fees); & Assistant for Producing My State-of-the-Art Videos; Legal Fees; Accountant Fees;
* PLUS, my own personal needs: Rent, food, utilities, etc. (Although I eat one vegan meal a day and live a very austere monastic life-style.)
FOR ME TO CONTINUE I’m requesting special financial assistance during this persisting crisis.
CAN SOMEONE(s) float me a loan for $5,000 or $10,000? I will arrange a 12 month repayment with a notarized IOU.
( Contact me at: bronathanael[at]yahoo[dot]com )
Click and Pledge is STILL an active Donation Venue for my ministry @
MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856
God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael
Eh, Sometimes I feel like my vote was wasted.
Great video though.
Goldtrump’s (cough, cough) U.N. speech (screed?), totally gosh, no couth at all.
All Americans (Jewmericans?) should be deeply ashamed. What a man-child!
Unfortunately, our choice was between a textbook sociopath and an emotionally immature mega narcissistic bully who lacks intellectual depth and wisdom.
My gosh…I just hope the truth gets out to the masses before Trump does anything (more) stupid.
But it won’t, the masses will suck up every bit of bull fed to them. There must be a saint or someone we can pray to to stop this insanity. ST. RITA OF CASCIA?
Buy Brother Nathanael T-Shirts, Coffee Mugs and Stickers etc,.
All profits go to the Brother Nathanael Foundation.
Boy, what a great, exceptional video yet again +BN.
Run this video on a giant screen at the U.N. H.Q.
Would make a sobering treat to those member nations.
Perhaps if the three circus members witnessed themselves, thereafter, do the logical… Hold their heads in shame!
Glad to see an article on the United Nations (UN). The UN seems to be the One World Government (OWG) prophesied to rule the world at the end time.
The UN is the official world government unlike NGOs such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, and other Jew World Order front groups. As the power and sovereignty of the USA and other nations drains away, that power flows to the UN which is being strengthened.
Zionism, Judaism, Mystery Babylon, the great whore of Revelaton, rides and guides this UN beast / government as prophesied -
Where did this Nikki Haley come from?
She is nothing more than a “Zionist Shill”!!
Brother Nathanael needs to be supported by ALL those who have a LOVE For The TRUTH that The LORD GOD has given to us in HIS WORD of TRUTH!
Yep, Americans were rather limited in their choices for the Presidential election of 2016. But as Boss Tweed famously said, “Elections? I only care about selections.”
The question in my mind is if Trump is acting out a deep state scheme himself. *Appearing* to be the media’s favorite villain - in order to better dupe his many constituents.
In any event, Him or Hellary… America is going to get what it deserves.
Catholics the world over had better prepare for what is coming as they’re going to be squarely in the sights of the Beast.
Dear Real Jew News Family,
YouTube just BANNED one of my Videos. (JewTube was initially funded by the Mossad/CIA.)
I’m working on an Appeal. (Don’t hold your breath.)
All kinds of blasphemy against Christ is allowed on JEWtube and ALL kinds of pornography.
But someone who tells the TRUTH gets BANNED for “hate speech,” a quasi-legal term JEWS invented, namely, the ADL.
I go from one discouragment to to another.
I’m broke, on the edge of debt, with VERY FEW supporting me. I’m in a deep depression to be quite frank about it.
And now with YouTube showing its teeth against TRUTH, it’s time for me to start promoting my OWN Video Platform:
Problem is, I have NO money to effectively promote it.
Donate by Click and Pledge @
By Network For Good (PayPal Friendly) @
MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856
God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael
JEWtube (YouTube) BANS Brother Nathanael’s “Riders On The Storm.”
It’s On My OWN Video Platform @
Let’s explain ”U.S.” politicians: John Kerry, grandfather Frederick A. Kerry, was born as Fritz Kohn in Horni Benesov, a town in Austria-Hungary (now Czech Silesia) and grew up in Mödling, a small town near Vienna.
Kohns wife, Ida Loewe, was born in Budapest. Both were German speaking Jews. In 1901, however, Fritz Kohn converted himself into Catholicism and changed his name to Frederick Kerry.
A Czech historian reports that Ida is a descendant of Sinai Loew, one of three older brothers of Rabbi Judah Loew (1525 - 22 August 1609), a well-known Kabbalist and Talmoedist, known as the Maharal of Prague.
this is not a exception there are many other ”U.S.” politicians from Kabbalist and Talmudist descent.
Jew Hefner left the land of the living for his eternal reward yesterday.
The Jews media, Playboy women, smut peddlers, and Hollyweird are singing his praises and pretending to be sad. Good they call evil and evil they call good, just as prophesied.
Hefner did more than anyone of his generation to destroy Christian morality and laws against perversion.
God bless you dear +BN and thanks for another terrific Video, particularly turning your laser focus on Nimrata Randhawa Haley.
Her parents are Sikhs who immigrated from the Punjab, India originally to Canada, and later to the US, where she was born in South Carolina, which makes her a first generation Indian-American.
Sikhs are mistaken for Muslims in America (sometimes tragically so) because of the Sikh turbans, but their religion is completely different from Islam. Sikhs have been here in America for at least 125 years, most of the early immigrants went to California and took up life as farmers and agricultural workers.
A peaceful people who strive to live in humility and modesty, they also do have a a warrior tradition historically tied into their religion based on defensive wars throughout their history in India.
Since the formative moments of the tradition, Sikhs have maintained a physical identity that makes them stand out in public, even in the context of South Asia.
This identity includes five articles of faith with deep spiritual meaning — kesh (unshorn hair), kanga (small comb), kara (steel bracelet), kirpan (religious article resembling a knife), and kachera (soldier-shorts) — and distinguishes someone, male or female, who has formally committed to the values of the faith by accepting initiation.
The most visible aspect of the Sikh identity is the turban, which can be worn by men and women alike. The turban was historically worn by royalty in South Asia, and the Sikh Gurus adopted this practice as a way of asserting the sovereignty and equality of all people.
For a Sikh, wearing a turban asserts a public commitment to maintaining the values and ethics of the tradition, including service, compassion, and honesty.
I’ve met few Sikhs here in California. Some are convenience store owners as well as farmers. They live modest, frugal, and virtuous lives, preferring to live a simple life in favor of devoting themselves to the spiritual.
As for the Sikh virtues of compassion, honesty, service and humility and modesty, it makes me wonder if “Nikki” is actually an adopted changling, because she is nothing like the sikhs I’ve know.
This is what happens when you have political appointee diplomats without university degrees in international relations, political science, economics, or law, or practical experience in some area of foreign relations.
Nimrata “Nikki” Rahdhawa Haley served as the 116th governor of South Carolina from January 2011 to January 2017, resigning midterm for Trump’s appointment as US Ambassador to the UN.Before her tenure as governor, Haley was a member of the South Carolina House of Representatives.
Haley has a Bachelor’s degree in accounting. She was the bookkeeper in her family’s clothing shop, later became CFO of her mother’s exotic clothing business.
A total foreign-policy novice just eight months ago, Haley’s only experience with foreign policy (of sorts) was signing the into law the despicable removal of the Confederate Flag from in the South Carolina statehouse grounds. It certainly launched her into national politics, however, shortly after manipulating and abusing people’s emotions after the Dylann Roof church shooting.
That’s the problem with double-minded political animals, though, they can change their mind on any whiff of political opportunity they get their snout to.
Haley had previously been a supporter of the flag as a symbol of Southern heritage honoring residents’ ancestors.
Nimrata’s speechwriter is Neocon Republican Jessica Gavora (Catholic Slovakian heritage), who is a much more powerful figure behind Haley than the title of “speechwriter” would let on. Gavora is a veteran GOP communicator who has worked for former Attorney General John Ashcroft and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
In the 1990s Gavora was director of programs at the New Citizenship Project, an organization which initiated the infamous and despicable Judeo-neocon Project for a New American Century
Gavora later became U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft’s chief speechwriter and was a senior policy adviser at the U.S. Department of Justice. She has written speeches for former house speaker Newt Gingrich, former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Gavora’s husband is the bloviating Neocon Jew, Jonah Goldberg, who dances to Hava Nagila while boasting about doing a stint as a prison guard in an Israeli “detention” prison where Palestinians are held for years without charges.
Goldberg is senior Editor of National Review, Zionist propagandist, and fellow at the Kaganite American Enterprise Institute — the PNAC temple of Judeo-Neocon politics.
As noted by Phil Weiss in April, Haley had become been a darling of the neocons well before she arrived at Turtle Bay.
She has very close ties (certainly as a protege) to fellow South Carolinian Sen. Lindsay Graham (and best Capitol Hill buddy, Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran McCain), long a neoconservative favorite for his staunch defense of Israel, belligerence toward Iran and Russia, and chronic interventionist instincts, especially as regards the U.S. military.
So it’s not coincidental that her most influential adviser, by all accounts, is David Glaccum (Irish neocon so far as I can tell), who served for years as Lindsey Graham’s chief counsel.
Not coincidentally, either, Nimrata Randhawa Haley is a Sheldon Adelson girl, the GOP’s and Trump’s single biggest donor.
Between May and June, 2016, Sheldon Adelson contributed $250,000 to Haley’s 527 political organization, A Great Day, funds that she used to target four Republican state senate rivals in primaries during her own state senate campaign. (Only one was successfully defeated.) Adelson was the largest contributor to her 527 group, which raised a total of $915,000.
We don’t really have a US Ambassador to the UN, it’s just that Israhell has two, one of which is permanent member of the UNSC. “It’s a new day for Israel at the United Nations.”
Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson, alongside his wife Miriam, was Trump’s biggest single campaign supporter, sending $25 million to pro-Trump Super PAC Future 45.
Earlier in the election cycle, Trump did make perfectly clear that Adelson’s financial support came with strings attached. Remember how he mocked Marco Rubio who was courting the Adelsons? In October 2015, Trump tweeted “Sheldon Adelson is looking to give big dollars to [Marco] Rubio because he feels he can mold him into the perfect little puppet. I agree!”
Trump didn’t say why Adelson wanted to use Rubio, but in 2012 Newt Gingrich said that Adelson’s “central value” is unconditional support for Israel, specifically its right-wing Likud party and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (the two reportedly experienced some kind of falling out).
I assume that the appointment of Adelson’s girl, Nimrata Haley, as US Ambassador to the UN was part of the payback for Adelson’s later financial support of Trump through donations to the Republican Party.
Adelson and Trump are long time friends, at least 30 years, ever since they were cronies in the elite gambling casino and hotel industry.
Adelson was treated as a guest of honor on Capitol Hill when Netanyahu delivered a March 2015 speech before Congress to blast the Iran deal, a rare moment in which Netanyahu directly dabbled in American partisan politics and threw into question the almost always fawning bipartisan support usually enjoyed by Israeli leaders on Capitol Hill.
In Israel, Adelson is a player directly supporting hard-right Likudnik politics. Bibsy Netanyahu’s principal financial backer, Adelson owns the pro-government daily Israel Hayom, a newspaper devoted to boosting Likud’s hard-line policy and prime minister, whose free distribution has made it Israeli’s leader.
Adelson is the patron saint of both Netanyahu and the Republican Party. Republican hopefuls have to tramp the beauty contest runway in the “Adelson Primary,” the annual meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition (100% Jewish membership) in Las Vegas — a key cattle call (mass audition) for presidential aspirants ready to please Master “Nuke Iran” Adelson.
Adelson at Yeshiva University, New York, 2013
( youtube.com/watch?v=6sCW4IasWX )
In attendance at the Adelson Primary are always a group of well-heeled Jewish Republican donors, many of whom see Adelson, who serves on the RJC’s board of directors, as a leader.
Sheldon Adelson likely did spend $100 million on the Trump Train, but funded through various Republican/Trump PACs, 527s, super-PACs, and diverted through who knows what other shadowy byways of election campaign contributions legal and not.
Jew York Times: May 13, 2016: “The casino magnate Sheldon G. Adelson told Donald J. Trump in a private meeting last week that he was willing to contribute more to help elect him than he has to any previous campaign, a sum that could exceed $100 million, according to two Republicans with direct knowledge of Mr. Adelson’s commitment.
As significant, [sic] Mr. Adelson, a billionaire based in Las Vegas, has decided that he will significantly scale back his giving to congressional Republicans and direct most of his contributions to groups dedicated to Mr. Trump’s campaign.
The two Republicans familiar with Mr. Adelson’s plans spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
Mr. Adelson’s pledge to Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, comes at an opportune time. …
Mr. Adelson plans to contribute his money to Mr. Trump. He will give the maximum allowed to Mr. Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee, but to spend the amount he contemplates would require donating through a “super PAC,” able to accept unlimited donations.” …
Adelson did donate at least $25m to Future45 Super Pac for ads attacking Hillary Clinton and backing Donald Trump – five times what he had been expected to contribute.
Trump was as good as his word, I think. Neither he personally, nor his own Make Israel (I mean America) Great Again campaign received any cash directly from Adelson, but there’s no way of knowing how much Adelson actually spent to elect Trump.
The GOP patron saint certainly had role in end around to invite Netanyahu to speak to Congress in 2015.
Anyway, Israel and Republican Jews love Nimrata. They call her Wonder Woman, a take off on the recent remake starring an Israel Jew, Gal Gadot, who served in the IDF when the Jews were blowing up Lebanon in 2006, and Hezbollah defeated them.
US envoy Haley in Jerusalem vows to defend Israel at UN
( arabnews.com/node/1111611/middle-east )
How Israelis see Haley.
Meme from Brothers Judd Blog as take off from Israeli Jewish star Gal Gadot in Wonder Woman remake of original American comic superheroine. After the movie came out, there was criticism of “white privilege” and there was some debate as to whether Gadot was “white” or not.
Forward’s exuberant Headline:
Move Over Gal Gadot! Israel Gives UN Ambassador Nikki Haley A Hero’s Reception
( forward.com/news/israel/374024/move-over-gal-gadot-israel-gives-un-ambassador-nikki-haley-a-heros-receptio/ )
How Nikki Haley Became the Darling of AIPAC and Even Trump Haters
( forward.com/news/national/366971/how-nikki-haley-became-the-darling-of-aipac-and-even-trump-haters/ )
The Israeli-American Council gives Nimrata top billing as a “Real Life Wonderwoman” and will appear at conference in November. (Take off on remake of Wonder Woman with an Israel Jewish star).
( youtube.com/watch?v=NqCMXgMZA0U )
IAC is part of the interlocking directorate of the Israeli Lobby, linked the Jewishly philanthropic Jewish Funders Network.
The Jewish Funders Network of billionaires can work in direct collaboration with the Israeli Government for ‘philanthropic’ purposes in Israel, have categories of philanthropy related investments, real estate deals, and so forth.
Trump has been a donor through the Jewish/Israeli philanthropist networks for decades, and is likely a member of the Jewish Funders Network. Certainly the Kushners and the rest of his kids and kids-in-law along with the Likud Party of Orthodox Jews in America are. Adelson is certainly a member too, along with all the rest of Jew York/Jew Jersey billionaires.
After declaring war on the UN all of this time, Netanyahu is vigorously lobbying for a seat at the United Nations Security Council, and he and Adelson are certainly expecting Nimrata to help deliver.
National Post (Canada): “Israel’s run at the Security Council has been in the works for 12 years and it will go up against Germany and Belgium for two open spots next year.
“Outreach to Africa, educational trips for foreign diplomats and a more conciliatory Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu make it clear: Israel is campaigning to overcome its acrimonious relationship with the United Nations in time to win a coveted spot on the Security Council next year.
Israel is working to rally enough votes in the 193-member General Assembly to defeat either Germany or Belgium in a three-way race for two spots on the UN’s most powerful body.”
( nationalpost.com/category/news )
There’s speculative rumors that Nimrata may be grooming to replace Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State. And she’s so ready, willing, and able to please Israel, that I wouldn’t be surprised but what she, the Wonder Woman of her Jewish backers, have an eye on a Pence-Haley 2020 ticket.
In the meantime, back in June, Adelson may be shopping for a replacement for Netanyahu, but in Israeli politics, who knows. The front-page headline of Adelson’s Israel Hayom strongly criticized Bibsy over his handling of the Temple Mount crisis, dubbing the matter “Netanyahu’s demonstration of helplessness.”
The subheading termed Israel’s response to events on the Temple Mount as “feeble and frightened.”
( haaretz.com/israel-news/1.803511 )
Another Haaretz headline blazed: Israel Abuzz Over Whether Sheldon Adelson Is Ditching Netanyahu for a New Favorite
Even more right-wing leader Naftali Bennett was seated next to the Trump campaign’s largest donor at a recent VIP dinner and is increasingly featuring in Israel Hayom
There are growing signs of Adelson transferring his affections – and finances – to Education Minister Naftali Bennett, the head of the Habayit Hayehudi party and a right-wing thorn in Netanyahu’s side with aspirations to replace him as prime minister.
Israelis are wondering whether Adelson’s patronage might be enough to boost Bennett from his current fringe position at the head of a small party to become the next leader of Israel’s nationalist right – and whether Netanyahu can survive without the political and financial backing of the Boston-born casino mogul.
Adelson has poured some $200 million into Israel Hayom, the loss-making giveaway tabloid he founded in 2007 that is now Israel’s largest-circulation newspaper – and affectionately known as the Bibiton, or “Bibi-daily.”
The paper’s role in Netanyahu’s 2009 election victory seemed so obvious his opponents called for an investigation into its funding under Israel’s election financing laws.
( haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.798593 )
So, Bibsy needs a big win, like getting a seat on the UN Security Council. What’s baffling is that Israel, a state in Southwest Asia, will be vying for the Belgian and German non-permanent seats. The UN election rules have dedicated African and Asian seats.
I guess Israel is “European” when it suits the purposes if it’s vying for one of two Western European seats. It’ll be interesting to see what the electing body, the UN General Assembly, does about this next June.
At its eighteenth session, in 1963, the Assembly decided that the non-permanent members of the Council should be elected according to the following pattern (resolution 1991 A (XVIII)):
Five from African and Asian States;
One from Eastern European States;
Two from Latin American States;
Two from Western European and other States
All of the Arab countries in orbit around the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the General Assembly will certainly vote for Israel, but according to the resolution, Israel isn’t geographically qualified to be a “West European state”.
Not only are Nimrata’s teeth too blindingly white for my sunglasses, her teeth never separate when she talks. She sounds like her jaw is wired shut and she’s talking through her teeth.
Maybe that’s so a forked tongue won’t accidentally slither out.
It’s About Time!
Giraldi - “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” @
That’s a great piece by Giraldi.
Giraldi got fired from The American Conservative after he posted his piece ‘America’s Jews Are Driving U.S. Wars’ at that site after 14 years of being a contributing writer.
I immediately cancelled my subscription with TAC when I read this.
Giraldi posted an update to the article he’d posted on Information Clearinghouse where he regularly contributes to.
By Philip Giraldi
UPDATE: September 25, 2017 - On the morning of September 21st Phil Giraldi was fired over the phone by The American Conservative, where he had been a regular contributor for fourteen years.
He was told that “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” was unacceptable.
The TAC management and board appear to have forgotten that the magazine was launched with an article by founder Pat Buchanan entitled “Whose War?” which largely made the same claims that Giraldi made about the Jewish push for another war, in that case with Iraq.
Buchanan was vilified and denounced as an anti-Semite by many of the same people who are now similarly attacking Giraldi.
I’m posting Buchanan’s 2003 zinger of an opinion piece in case The American Conservative decides to yank it, too.
A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.
The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged.
In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: “Can you assure American viewers … that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”
Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group.
People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.
Former Wall Street Journal editor Max Boot kicked off the campaign. When these “Buchananites toss around ‘neoconservative’—and cite names like Wolfowitz and Cohen—it sometimes sounds as if what they really mean is ‘Jewish conservative.’”
Yet Boot readily concedes that a passionate attachment to Israel is a “key tenet of neoconservatism.”
He also claims that the National Security Strategy of President Bush “sounds as if it could have come straight out from the pages of Commentary magazine, the neocon bible.” (For the uninitiated, Commentary, the bible in which Boot seeks divine guidance, is the monthly of the American Jewish Committee.)
David Brooks of the Weekly Standard wails that attacks based on the Israel tie have put him through personal hell: “Now I get a steady stream of anti-Semitic screeds in my e-mail, my voicemail and in my mailbox. … Anti-Semitism is alive and thriving. It’s just that its epicenter is no longer on the Buchananite Right, but on the peace-movement left.”
Washington Post columnist Robert Kagan endures his own purgatory abroad: “In London … one finds Britain’s finest minds propounding, in sophisticated language and melodious Oxbridge accents, the conspiracy theories of Pat Buchanan concerning the ‘neoconservative’ (read: Jewish) hijacking of American foreign policy.”
Lawrence Kaplan of the New Republic charges that our little magazine “has been transformed into a forum for those who contend that President Bush has become a client of … Ariel Sharon and the ‘neoconservative war party.’”
Referencing Charles Lindbergh, he accuses Paul Schroeder, Chris Matthews, Robert Novak, Georgie Anne Geyer, Jason Vest of the Nation, and Gary Hart of implying that “members of the Bush team have been doing Israel’s bidding and, by extension, exhibiting ‘dual loyalties.’” Kaplan thunders:
The real problem with such claims is not just that they are untrue. The problem is that they are toxic.
Invoking the specter of dual loyalty to mute criticism and debate amounts to more than the everyday pollution of public discourse. It is the nullification of public discourse, for how can one refute accusations grounded in ethnicity? The charges are, ipso facto, impossible to disprove. And so they are meant to be.
What is going on here? Slate’s Mickey Kaus nails it in the headline of his retort: “Lawrence Kaplan Plays the Anti-Semitic Card.”
What Kaplan, Brooks, Boot, and Kagan are doing is what the Rev. Jesse Jackson does when caught with some mammoth contribution from a Fortune 500 company he has lately accused of discriminating. He plays the race card. So, too, the neoconservatives are trying to fend off critics by assassinating their character and impugning their motives.
Indeed, it is the charge of “anti-Semitism” itself that is toxic. For this venerable slander is designed to nullify public discourse by smearing and intimidating foes and censoring and blacklisting them and any who would publish them.
Neocons say we attack them because they are Jewish. We do not. We attack them because their warmongering threatens our country, even as it finds a reliable echo in Ariel Sharon.
And this time the boys have cried “wolf” once too often. It is not working. As Kaus notes, Kaplan’s own New Republic carries Harvard professor Stanley Hoffman. In writing of the four power centers in this capital that are clamoring for war, Hoffman himself describes the fourth thus:
“And, finally, there is a loose collection of friends of Israel, who believe in the identity of interests between the Jewish state and the United States. … These analysts look on foreign policy through the lens of one dominant concern: Is it good or bad for Israel?
“Since that nation’s founding in 1948, these thinkers have never been in very good odor at the State Department, but now they are well ensconced in the Pentagon, around such strategists as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.”
“If Stanley Hoffman can say this,” asks Kaus, “why can’t Chris Matthews?” Kaus also notes that Kaplan somehow failed to mention the most devastating piece tying the neoconservatives to Sharon and his Likud Party.
In a Feb. 9 front-page article in the Washington Post, Robert Kaiser quotes a senior U.S. official as saying, “The Likudniks are really in charge now.”
Kaiser names Perle, Wolfowitz, and Feith as members of a pro-Israel network inside the administration and adds David Wurmser of the Defense Department and Elliott Abrams of the National Security Council. (Abrams is the son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, editor emeritus of Commentary, whose magazine has for decades branded critics of Israel as anti-Semites.)
Noting that Sharon repeatedly claims a “special closeness” to the Bushites, Kaiser writes, “For the first time a U.S. administration and a Likud government are pursuing nearly identical policies.” And a valid question is: how did this come to be, and while it is surely in Sharon’s interest, is it in America’s interest?
This is a time for truth. For America is about to make a momentous decision: whether to launch a series of wars in the Middle East that could ignite the Clash of Civilizations against which Harvard professor Samuel Huntington has warned, a war we believe would be a tragedy and a disaster for this Republic.
To avert this war, to answer the neocon smears, we ask that our readers review their agenda as stated in their words. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. As Al Smith used to say, “Nothing un-American can live in the sunlight.”
We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those wars and destroy the Oslo Accords.
We charge them with deliberately damaging U.S. relations with every state in the Arab world that defies Israel or supports the Palestinian people’s right to a homeland of their own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and bellicosity.
Not in our lifetimes has America been so isolated from old friends. Far worse, President Bush is being lured into a trap baited for him by these neocons that could cost him his office and cause America to forfeit years of peace won for us by the sacrifices of two generations in the Cold War.
They charge us with anti-Semitism—i.e., a hatred of Jews for their faith, heritage, or ancestry. False. The truth is, those hurling these charges harbor a “passionate attachment” to a nation not our own that causes them to subordinate the interests of their own country and to act on an assumption that, somehow, what’s good for Israel is good for America.
Who are the neoconservatives? The first generation were ex-liberals, socialists, and Trotskyites, boat-people from the McGovern revolution who rafted over to the GOP at the end of conservatism’s long march to power with Ronald Reagan in 1980.
A neoconservative, wrote Kevin Phillips back then, is more likely to be a magazine editor than a bricklayer. Today, he or she is more likely to be a resident scholar at a public policy institute such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) or one of its clones like the Center for Security Policy or the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).
As one wag writes, a neocon is more familiar with the inside of a think tank than an Abrams tank.
Almost none came out of the business world or military, and few if any came out of the Goldwater campaign. The heroes they invoke are Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Harry Truman, Martin Luther King, and Democratic Senators Henry “Scoop” Jackson (Wash.) and Pat Moynihan (N.Y.).
All are interventionists who regard Stakhanovite support of Israel as a defining characteristic of their breed. Among their luminaries are Jeane Kirkpatrick, Bill Bennett, Michael Novak, and James Q. Wilson.
Their publications include the Weekly Standard, Commentary, the New Republic, National Review, and the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. Though few in number, they wield disproportionate power through control of the conservative foundations and magazines, through their syndicated columns, and by attaching themselves to men of power.
Beating the War Drums
When the Cold War ended, these neoconservatives began casting about for a new crusade to give meaning to their lives.
On Sept. 11, their time came. They seized on that horrific atrocity to steer America’s rage into all-out war to destroy their despised enemies, the Arab and Islamic “rogue states” that have resisted U.S. hegemony and loathe Israel.
The War Party’s plan, however, had been in preparation far in advance of 9/11. And when President Bush, after defeating the Taliban, was looking for a new front in the war on terror, they put their precooked meal in front of him. Bush dug into it.
Before introducing the script-writers of America’s future wars, consider the rapid and synchronized reaction of the neocons to what happened after that fateful day.
On Sept. 12, Americans were still in shock when Bill Bennett told CNN that we were in “a struggle between good and evil,” that the Congress must declare war on “militant Islam,” and that “overwhelming force” must be used.
Bennett cited Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and China as targets for attack. Not, however, Afghanistan, the sanctuary of Osama’s terrorists. How did Bennett know which nations must be smashed before he had any idea who attacked us?
The Wall Street Journal immediately offered up a specific target list, calling for U.S. air strikes on “terrorist camps in Syria, Sudan, Libya, and Algeria, and perhaps even in parts of Egypt.” Yet, not one of Bennett’s six countries, nor one of these five, had anything to do with 9/11.
On Sept. 15, according to Bob Woodward’s Bush at War, “Paul Wolfowitz put forth military arguments to justify a U.S. attack on Iraq rather than Afghanistan.” Why Iraq? Because, Wolfowitz argued in the War Cabinet, while “attacking Afghanistan would be uncertain … Iraq was a brittle oppressive regime that might break easily. It was doable.”
On Sept. 20, forty neoconservatives sent an open letter to the White House instructing President Bush on how the war on terror must be conducted. Signed by Bennett, Podhoretz, Kirkpatrick, Perle, Kristol, and Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, the letter was an ultimatum.
To retain the signers’ support, the president was told, he must target Hezbollah for destruction, retaliate against Syria and Iran if they refuse to sever ties to Hezbollah, and overthrow Saddam. Any failure to attack Iraq, the signers warned Bush, “will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”
Here was a cabal of intellectuals telling the Commander-in-Chief, nine days after an attack on America, that if he did not follow their war plans, he would be charged with surrendering to terror. Yet, Hezbollah had nothing to do with 9/11. What had Hezbollah done? Hezbollah had humiliated Israel by driving its army out of Lebanon [in 2000].
President Bush had been warned. He was to exploit the attack of 9/11 to launch a series of wars on Arab regimes, none of which had attacked us.
All, however, were enemies of Israel. “Bibi” Netanyahu, the former Prime Minister of Israel, like some latter-day Citizen Genet, was ubiquitous on American television, calling for us to crush the “Empire of Terror.” The “Empire,” it turns out, consisted of Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, Iraq, and “the Palestinian enclave.”
Nasty as some of these regimes and groups might be, what had they done to the United States?
The War Party seemed desperate to get a Middle East war going before America had second thoughts. Tom Donnelly of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) called for an immediate invasion of Iraq. “Nor need the attack await the deployment of half a million troops. … [T]he larger challenge will be occupying Iraq after the fighting is over,” he wrote.
Donnelly was echoed by Jonah Goldberg of National Review: “The United States needs to go to war with Iraq because it needs to go to war with someone in the region and Iraq makes the most sense.”
Goldberg endorsed “the Ledeen Doctrine” of ex-Pentagon official Michael Ledeen, which Goldberg described thus:
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show we mean business.” (When the French ambassador in London, at a dinner party, asked why we should risk World War III over some “shitty little country”—meaning Israel—Goldberg’s magazine was not amused.)
Ledeen, however, is less frivolous. In The War Against the Terror Masters, he identifies the exact regimes America must destroy:
First and foremost, we must bring down the terror regimes, beginning with the Big Three: Iran, Iraq, and Syria. And then we have to come to grips with Saudi Arabia. …
Once the tyrants in Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Saudi Arabia have been brought down, we will remain engaged. …We have to ensure the fulfillment of the democratic revolution. …
Stability is an unworthy American mission, and a misleading concept to boot. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize.
Rejecting stability as “an unworthy American mission,” Ledeen goes on to define America’s authentic “historic mission”:
“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law.
“Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. … [W]e must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”
Passages like this owe more to Leon Trotsky than to Robert Taft and betray a Jacobin streak in neoconservatism that cannot be reconciled with any concept of true conservatism.
To the Weekly Standard, Ledeen’s enemies list was too restrictive. We must not only declare war on terror networks and states that harbor terrorists, said the Standard, we should launch wars on “any group or government inclined to support or sustain others like them in the future.”
Robert Kagan and William Kristol were giddy with excitement at the prospect of Armageddon. The coming war “is going to spread and engulf a number of countries. … It is going to resemble the clash of civilizations that everyone has hoped to avoid. … [I]t is possible that the demise of some ‘moderate’ Arab regimes may be just round the corner.”
Norman Podhoretz in Commentary even outdid Kristol’s Standard, rhapsodizing that we should embrace a war of civilizations, as it is George W. Bush’s mission “to fight World War IV—the war against militant Islam.”
By his count, the regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown are not confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil (Iraq, Iran, North Korea). At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and Lebanon and Libya, as well as ‘“friends” of America like the Saudi royal family and Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian Authority.
Bush must reject the “timorous counsels” of the “incorrigibly cautious Colin Powell,” wrote Podhoretz, and “find the stomach to impose a new political culture on the defeated” Islamic world. As the war against al-Qaeda required that we destroy the Taliban, Podhoretz wrote,
“We may willy-nilly find ourselves forced … to topple five or six or seven more tyrannies in the Islamic world (including that other sponsor of terrorism, Yasir Arafat’s Palestinian Authority). I can even [imagine] the turmoil of this war leading to some new species of an imperial mission for America, whose purpose would be to oversee the emergence of successor governments in the region more amenable to reform and modernization than the despotisms now in place. …
“I can also envisage the establishment of some kind of American protectorate over the oil fields of Saudi Arabia, as we more and more come to wonder why 7,000 princes should go on being permitted to exert so much leverage over us and everyone else.”
Podhoretz credits Eliot Cohen with the phrase “World War IV.” Bush was shortly thereafter seen carrying about a gift copy of Cohen’s book that celebrates civilian mastery of the military in times of war, as exhibited by such leaders as Winston Churchill and David Ben Gurion.
A list of the Middle East regimes that Podhoretz, Bennett, Ledeen, Netanyahu, and the Wall Street Journal regard as targets for destruction thus includes Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, and “militant Islam.”
Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West and Islam?
Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud.
Indeed, Sharon has been everywhere the echo of his acolytes in America. In February 2003, Sharon told a delegation of Congressmen that, after Saddam’s regime is destroyed, it is of “vital importance” that the United States disarm Iran, Syria, and Libya.
“We have a great interest in shaping the Middle East the day after” the war on Iraq, Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz told the Conference of Major American Jewish Organizations. After U.S. troops enter Baghdad, the United States must generate “political, economic, diplomatic pressure” on Tehran, Mofaz admonished the American Jews.
Are the neoconservatives concerned about a war on Iraq bringing down friendly Arab governments? Not at all. They would welcome it.
“Mubarak is no great shakes,” says Richard Perle of the President of Egypt. “Surely we can do better than Mubarak.”
Asked about the possibility that a war on Iraq—which he predicted would be a “cakewalk”—might upend governments in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, former UN ambassador Ken Adelman told Joshua Micah Marshall of Washington Monthly, “All the better if you ask me.”
On July 10, 2002, Perle invited a former aide to Lyndon LaRouche named Laurent Murawiec to address the Defense Policy Board. In a briefing that startled Henry Kissinger, Murawiec named Saudi Arabia as “the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent” of the United States.
Washington should give Riyadh an ultimatum, he said. Either you Saudis “prosecute or isolate those involved in the terror chain, including the Saudi intelligence services,” and end all propaganda against Israel, or we invade your country, seize your oil fields, and occupy Mecca.
In closing his PowerPoint presentation, Murawiec offered a “Grand Strategy for the Middle East.” “Iraq is the tactical pivot, Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot, Egypt the prize.”
Leaked reports of Murawiec’s briefing did not indicate if anyone raised the question of how the Islamic world might respond to U.S. troops tramping around the grounds of the Great Mosque.
What these neoconservatives seek is to conscript American blood to make the world safe for Israel. They want the peace of the sword imposed on Islam and American soldiers to die if necessary to impose it.
Washington Times editor at large Arnaud de Borchgrave calls this the “Bush-Sharon Doctrine.” “Washington’s ‘Likudniks,’” he writes, “have been in charge of U.S. policy in the Middle East since Bush was sworn into office.”
The neocons seek American empire, and Sharonites seek hegemony over the Middle East. The two agendas coincide precisely. And though neocons insist that it was Sept. 11 that made the case for war on Iraq and militant Islam, the origins of their war plans go back far before.
“Securing the Realm”
The principal draftsman is Richard Perle, an aide to Sen. Scoop Jackson, who, in 1970, was overheard on a federal wiretap discussing classified information from the National Security Council with the Israeli Embassy.
In Jews and American Politics, published in 1974, Stephen D. Isaacs wrote, “Richard Perle and Morris Amitay command a tiny army of Semitophiles on Capitol Hill and direct Jewish power in behalf of Jewish interests.” In 1983, the New York Times reported that Perle had taken substantial payments from an Israeli weapons manufacturer.
In 1996, with Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, Perle wrote “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” for Prime Minister Netanyahu. In it, Perle, Feith, and Wurmser urged Bibi to ditch the Oslo Accords of the assassinated Yitzak Rabin and adopt a new aggressive strategy:
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq—an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right—as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.
Jordan has challenged Syria’s regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq.
In the Perle-Feith-Wurmser strategy, Israel’s enemy remains Syria, but the road to Damascus runs through Baghdad. Their plan, which urged Israel to re-establish “the principle of preemption,” has now been imposed by Perle, Feith, Wurmser & Co. on the United States.
In his own 1997 paper, “A Strategy for Israel,” Feith pressed Israel to re-occupy “the areas under Palestinian Authority control,” though “the price in blood would be high.”
Wurmser, as a resident scholar at AEI, drafted joint war plans for Israel and the United States “to fatally strike the centers of radicalism in the Middle East. Israel and the United States should … broaden the conflict to strike fatally, not merely disarm, the centers of radicalism in the region—the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Tehran, and Gaza.
“That would establish the recognition that fighting either the United States or Israel is suicidal.”
He urged both nations to be on the lookout for a crisis, for as he wrote, “Crises can be opportunities.” Wurmser published his U.S.-Israeli war plan on Jan. 1, 2001, nine months before 9/11.
About the Perle-Feith-Wurmser cabal, author Michael Lind writes:
“The radical Zionist right to which Perle and Feith belong is small in number but it has become a significant force in Republican policy-making circles. It is a recent phenomenon, dating back to the late 1970s and 1980s, when many formerly Democratic Jewish intellectuals joined the broad Reagan coalition.
“While many of these hawks speak in public about global crusades for democracy, the chief concern of many such “neo-conservatives” is the power and reputation of Israel.
Right down the smokestack.
Perle today chairs the Defense Policy Board, Feith is an Undersecretary of Defense, and Wurmser is special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control, John Bolton, who dutifully echoes the Perle-Sharon line. According to the Israeli daily newspaper Ha’aretz, in late February,
U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials … that he has no doubt America will attack Iraq and that it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea afterwards.
On Jan. 26, 1998, President Clinton received a letter imploring him to use his State of the Union address to make removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime the “aim of American foreign policy” and to use military action because “diplomacy is failing.”
Were Clinton to do that, the signers pledged, they would “offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.” Signing the pledge were Elliott Abrams, Bill Bennett, John Bolton, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, Richard Perle, and Paul Wolfowitz. Four years before 9/11, the neocons had Baghdad on their minds.
The Wolfowitz Doctrine
In 1992, a startling document was leaked from the office of Paul Wolfowitz at the Pentagon. Barton Gellman of the Washington Post called it a “classified blueprint intended to help ‘set the nation’s direction for the next century.’”
The Wolfowitz Memo called for a permanent U.S. military presence on six continents to deter all “potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.” Containment, the victorious strategy of the Cold War, was to give way to an ambitious new strategy designed to “establish and protect a new order.”
Though the Wolfowitz Memo was denounced and dismissed in 1992, it became American policy in the 33-page National Security Strategy (NSS) issued by President Bush on Sept. 21, 2002.
Washington Post reporter Tim Reich describes it as a “watershed in U.S. foreign policy” that “reverses the fundamental principles that have guided successive Presidents for more than 50 years: containment and deterrence.”
Andrew Bacevich, a professor at Boston University, writes of the NSS that he marvels at “its fusion of breathtaking utopianism with barely disguised machtpolitik. It reads as if it were the product not of sober, ostensibly conservative Republicans but of an unlikely collaboration between Woodrow Wilson and the elder Field Marshal von Moltke.”
In confronting America’s adversaries, the paper declares, “We will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting preemptively.” It warns any nation that seeks to acquire power to rival the United States that it will be courting war with the United States:
“[T]he president has no intention of allowing any nation to catch up with the huge lead the United States has opened since the fall of the Soviet Union more than a decade ago. … Our forces will be strong enough to dissuade potential adversaries from pursuing a military buildup in hopes of surpassing or equaling the power of the United States.”
America must reconcile herself to an era of “nation-building on a grand scale, and with no exit strategy,” Robert Kagan instructs. But this Pax Americana the neocons envision bids fair to usher us into a time of what Harry Elmer Barnes called “permanent war for permanent peace.”
The Munich Card
As President Bush was warned on Sept. 20, 2001, that he will be indicted for “a decisive surrender” in the war on terror should he fail to attack Iraq, he is also on notice that pressure on Israel is forbidden.
For as the neoconservatives have played the anti-Semitic card, they will not hesitate to play the Munich card as well. A year ago, when Bush called on Sharon to pull out of the West Bank, Sharon fired back that he would not let anyone do to Israel what Neville Chamberlain had done to the Czechs.
Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy immediately backed up Ariel Sharon:
“With each passing day, Washington appears to view its principal Middle Eastern ally’s conduct as inconvenient—in much the same way London and Paris came to see Czechoslovakia’s resistance to Hitler’s offers of peace in exchange for Czech lands.”
When former U.S. NATO commander Gen. George Jouwlan said the United States may have to impose a peace on Israel and the Palestinians, he, too, faced the charge of appeasement. Wrote Gaffney,
“They would, presumably, go beyond Britain and France’s sell-out of an ally at Munich in 1938.
“The “impose a peace” school is apparently prepared to have us play the role of Hitler’s Wehrmacht as well, seizing and turning over to Yasser Arafat the contemporary Sudetenland: the West Bank and Gaza Strip and perhaps part of Jerusalem as well.”
Podhoretz agreed Sharon was right in the substance of what he said but called it politically unwise to use the Munich analogy.
President Bush is on notice: Should he pressure Israel to trade land for peace, the Oslo formula in which his father and Yitzak Rabin believed, he will, as was his father, be denounced as an anti-Semite and a Munich-style appeaser by both Israelis and their neoconservatives allies inside his own Big Tent.
Yet, if Bush cannot deliver Sharon there can be no peace. And if there is no peace in the Mideast there is no security for us, ever—for there will be no end to terror.
As most every diplomat and journalist who travels to the region will relate, America’s failure to be even-handed, our failure to rein in Sharon, our failure to condemn Israel’s excesses, and our moral complicity in Israel’s looting of Palestinian lands and denial of their right to self-determination sustains the anti-Americanism in the Islamic world in which terrorists and terrorism breed.
Let us conclude. The Israeli people are America’s friends and have a right to peace and secure borders. We should help them secure these rights. As a nation, we have made a moral commitment, endorsed by half a dozen presidents, which Americans wish to honor, not to permit these people who have suffered much to see their country overrun and destroyed. And we must honor this commitment.
But U.S. and Israeli interests are not identical. They often collide, and when they do, U.S. interests must prevail. Moreover, we do not view the Sharon regime as “America’s best friend.”
Since the time of Ben Gurion, the behavior of the Israeli regime has been Jekyll and Hyde.
In the 1950s, its intelligence service, the Mossad, had agents in Egypt blow up U.S. installations to make it appear the work of Cairo, to destroy U.S. relations with the new Nasser government.
During the Six Day War, Israel ordered repeated attacks on the undefended USS Liberty that killed 34 American sailors and wounded 171 and included the machine-gunning of life rafts. This massacre was neither investigated nor punished by the U.S. government in an act of national cravenness.
Though we have given Israel $20,000 for every Jewish citizen, Israel refuses to stop building the settlements that are the cause of the Palestinian Intifada.
Likud has dragged our good name through the mud and blood of Ramallah, ignored Bush’s requests to restrain itself, and sold U.S. weapons technology to China, including the Patriot, the Phoenix air-to-air missile, and the Lavi fighter, which is based on F-16 technology. Only direct U.S. intervention blocked Israel’s sale of our AWACS system.
Israel suborned Jonathan Pollard to loot our secrets and refuses to return the documents, which would establish whether or not they were sold to Moscow.
When Clinton tried to broker an agreement at Wye Plantation between Israel and Arafat, Bibi Netanyahu attempted to extort, as his price for signing, release of Pollard, so he could take this treasonous snake back to Israel as a national hero.
Do the Brits, our closest allies, behave like this?
Though we have said repeatedly that we admire much of what this president has done, he will not deserve re-election if he does not jettison the neoconservatives’ agenda of endless wars on the Islamic world that serve only the interests of a country other than the one he was elected to preserve and protect.
( theamericanconservative.com/articles/whose-war/ )
Dearest Brother Nathanael,
Hope this finds you well.
There is a time for every season under heaven.
Prayer and repentance is still the order of the day, not only for those who already believe but for those who still await His coming.
God Bless you richly, donation forthcoming soon I hope.
Brother Nathanael Foundation on SPLC Hate Map?
YES! We HAVE ARRIVED! God Bless us all!
We made it to “General Hate.” This is not to be confused with “Generic Hate,” which is really beneath us. What it does signify is something like “Sweeping Hate.”
That’s better, since Jew-designated “hate” is a synonym for FACTS…”Sweeping FACTS!”
Go to Hate Map, choose General Hate in menu, and it will show a green dot in Colorado. That’s BNF.
“General Hate.” LOL.
When I learned you could be banned from the UK for having an opinion, I always wanted to be banned. So far, no dice.
I’d just think, “Wow I do exist?” It’s the type of thing that would look great on a resume. LOL.
^^^ Bwahahaha @ that news
SPLC, ADL, etc- all that kind of Jew World Order pinko commie bs totally sucks.
It’s probably all just a Kabbalah trick for mind control of the masses at the end of the day.
Russia Insider: Russia Remembers Stalin’s Victims, MSM Doesn’t Utter a Word
It may interfere with their narrative that Putin is rehabilitating Stalin
Thank you for the excellent reporting. But there are Jews who oppose war, from Prof. Stephen Cohen.
Consider using Tinypass to accept payments. I found on this site, it takes PayPal and Amazon Payments, you can make monthly payments, and it seems to be anonymous: it doesn’t show who you donate to they just get the money.
Here’s an example. I don’t know how it works but your computer-tech should.
Sheesh! The Jewstream media which has *always* ignored, downplayed or even supported Stalin’s crimes, has suddenly become concerned that Putin will unleash Stalin’s ghost on a wailing world.
You can’t make this stuff up.
Brother Nate is “General Hate” at the SPLC?
Congrats on your promotion, Brother Nate!
The curses of devils say as much as the praise of angels.
NEW VID planned for tomorrow.
Help Me CONTINUE!
Donate by Click and Pledge @
MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856
God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael
Terrible news from Las Vegas yesterday.
Real? Hoax? Deep state? Mossad?
I am looking forwards to your take, Brother Nathanael.
Basil, given the Jewstream media’s propensity to lie — when the truth would serve them better — I’d remain suspicious about the LV shooting.
Might be real though I’d happily bet that at the very least the whole thing’s been grossly exaggerated - or maybe even a complete fabrication.
A good place to start would be checking YouTube for videos detailing anomalies in the delivered narrative.
Students of 911 will recognize a pattern: the Jews media seemed ready to run with this from the very start. As if they somehow knew in advance….
It’s real. As real as it gets.
Starting right after the shooting, I’ve received prayer requests from several long-time Orthodox friends in Las Vegas for all of the victims, the all of the police and emergency services personnel, and the hospitals which were overwhelmed with all of the patients.
They asked for my prayers for the injured on-duty Las Vegas Metro cops, I believe there were two.
One off-duty LVMPD cop was killed (the PD is wearing black ribbons on their badges), and prayers especially for numerous off-duty Southern California police officers, deputies and and firefighters who were also shot and injured.
I’ve just read that an Englewood, Colorado off-duty cop attending the concert was shot and is in the hospital, but should recover from non-life threatening wounds.
I’ve also received prayer requests from an Orthodox family and church in Arizona for a 19-year ol young woman of their parish who went to the concert. She was shot in the abdomen.
The bullet ricocheted inside her body and she had several major organs removed or repaired. She had two abdominal surgeries to repair her esophagus because it is separated from her stomach.
Her spleen had to be removed; her colon had to be re-sectioned, and her liver repaired. She was in critical care and still in ICU today.
The parish priest in Arizona asked an Orthodox priest in Las Vegas to go see her yesterday. After his prayers, she opened her eyes and smiled at him.
Lord have mercy on us all.
How I Got Fired - Philip Giraldi
Exposing Jewish power in America has real consequences
Two weeks ago, I wrote for Unz.com an article entitled “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars.” It sought to make several points concerning the consequences of Jewish political power vis-à-vis some aspects of U.S. foreign policy.
It noted that some individual American Jews and organizations with close ties to Israel, whom I named and identified, are greatly disproportionately represented in the government, media, foundations, think tanks and lobbying that is part and parcel of the deliberations that lead to formulation of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
Inevitably, those policies are skewed to represent Israeli interests and do serious damage to genuine American equities in the region. This tilt should not necessarily surprise anyone who has been paying attention and was noted by Nathan Glazer, among others, as long ago as 1976.
The end result of Israel centric policymaking in Washington is to produce negotiators like Dennis Ross, who consistently supported Israeli positions in peace talks, so much so that he was referred to as “Israel’s lawyer.”
It also can result in wars, which is of particular concern given the current level of hostility being generated by these same individuals and organizations relating to Iran. This group of Israel advocates is as responsible as any other body in the United States for the deaths of thousands of Americans and literally millions of mostly Muslim foreigners in unnecessary wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria.
It has also turned the U.S. into an active accomplice in the brutal suppression of the Palestinians.
That they have never expressed any remorse or regret and the fact that the deaths and suffering don’t seem to matter to them are clear indictments of the sheer inhumanity of the positions they embrace.
The claims that America’s Middle Eastern wars have been fought for Israel are not an anti-Semitic delusion.
Some observers, including former high government official Philip Zelikow, believe that Iraq was attacked by the U.S. in 2003 to protect Israel.
On April 3rd, just as the war was starting, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz headlined “The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.”
It then went on to describe how “In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in [Washington]: the belief in war against Iraq.
“That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another.”
And the deference to a Jewish proprietary interest in Middle Eastern policy produces U.S. Ambassadors to Israel who are more comfortable explaining Israeli positions than in supporting American interests.
David Friedman, the current Ambassador, spoke last week defending illegal Israeli settlements, which are contrary to official U.S. policy, arguing that they represented only 2% of the West Bank.
He did not mention that the land controlled by Israel, to include a security zone, actually represents 60% of the total area.
My suggestion for countering the overrepresentation of a special interest in policy formulation was to avoid putting Jewish government officials in that position by, insofar as possible, not giving them assignments relating to policy in the Middle East.
As I noted in my article, that was, in fact, the norm regarding Ambassadors and senior foreign service assignments to Israel prior to 1995, when Bill Clinton broke precedent by appointing Australian citizen Martin Indyk to the position.
I think, on balance, it is eminently sensible to avoid putting people in jobs where they will likely have conflicts of interest.
Another solution that I suggested for American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and find themselves in a position that considers policy for that country and its neighbors would be to recuse themselves from the deliberations, just as a judge who finds himself personally involved in a judicial proceeding might withdraw.
It would seem to me that, depending on the official’s actual relationship with Israel, it would be a clear conflict of interest to do otherwise.
The argument that such an individual could protect American interests while also having a high level of concern for a foreign nation with contrary interests is at best questionable. As George Washington observed in his farewell address,
“…a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.
“Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification…”
My article proved to be quite popular, particularly after former CIA officer Valerie Plame tweeted her approval of it and was viciously and repeatedly attacked, resulting in a string of abject apologies on her part.
As a reasonably well-known public figure, Plame attracted a torrent of negative press, in which I, as the author of the piece being tweeted, was also identified and excoriated.
In every corner of the mainstream media I was called “a well-known anti-Semite,” “a long time anti-Israel fanatic,” and, ironically, “a somewhat obscure character.”
Off topic because no conservative or Alt-right site has mentioned anything about this except for Alex Jones. I would like to hear from you on the NFL and Vegas events…
I believe that some of the Vegas events may be used to establish that it was a leftist facilitated black ops meant to take attention away from the anti-white America NFL events that will cost the cultural marxist Zionist gaming empire millions in lost revenues and in keeping us goy asleep with their Talmudic hedonistic TV nonsense…
NFL anti-white America protests = A bunch of white Christians shot to pieces at a white music country concert by enemy trained and armed scumbags. Makes sense to me. Whites lose again while rich AshkeNazi and Sephardi Jews and their Muslim employees make millions off of taking attention way from their anti-white Christian NFL, NBA, and MLB…etc.
According to much of the evidence existing within multiple articles posted across the web and media.
Much of what I stated on Vegas event is just common sense and reasoning and is just as close to the facts as one can get in this day of cultural marxist socialized treason, neoprogressive misinformation, and leftist Zionist facilitated white Christian genocide.
What are your facts and what are they based upon without parroting some web site story Sherlock?