Main Contents

Modern Man In A Jewish Age

Brother Nathanael Channel, BroVids

Modern Man In A Jewish Age
Copyright 2012

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!


Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation@yahoo.com
__________________________________


For More See: The Church VS The Synagogue Click Here

And: Christian Roots Of White Nations Click Here

And: All BroTube Videos Click Here


CLICK: Brother Nathanael! Street Evangelist!

Support Brother Nathanael!

Please Send Your Donation To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856

E-mail: bronathanael@yahoo.com@yahoo.com

Follow me on Facebook: 

Send this article/post as a PDF attachment to PDF | PDF Creator | PDF Converter

Brother Nathanael @ May 27, 2012

86 Comments

  1. Brother Nathanael May 27, 2012 @ 9:46 pm

    Text — Text — Text

    Modern Man In A Jewish Age
    By Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Copyright 2012

    The isolation of the soul begins with the rise of Jewish hegemony over Western Civilization.

    Prior to and even during Europe’s “emancipation of the Jews” in the 18th Century, Christian Monarchy providing stability and contentment ruled the Continent.

    It was World War I that marked the turning point in modern history whose deadly effects on modern man can still be felt today.

    With World War I’s end the great transformation of Western Society from Sovereign Kings “for the people” to Democracy—ostensibly, “in the name of the people”—that began with the French Revolution was completed.

    Four Christian Monarchies were annihilated at World War I’s end: The Habsburgs of Austria; The Romanovs of Russia; The Hohenzollerns of Germany; and south of Europe, the Kingdom of Greece.

    “Democracy”—though touted as marking the “end of history” in which no further political structure is desired—can be defined as any country ruled by Jews.

    For in a “democracy”—manipulated by propaganda and campaign funding—Jewry, which pulls the levers of the main stream media and political favors, determines democracy’s final end product: The Union of Synagogue and State.

    Now, this poses a dilemma for modern man.

    For modern man, immersed in the Jewification of his culture…useful to the Jew alone … dies a sure and certain death.

    This dilemma—the sickness of the 20th and 21st Centuries—can diagnosed as the “isolation of the soul” which finds modern man cut off from the one unique entity that historically has opposed the Jewish Imperative: The Church.

    Only one man, Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, is dedicated to restoring the Tradition of the Byzantine Christian Imperium, the “Symphonia” of Church and State, where a “Union of Synagogue and State” is forbidden.

    (It was Putin, remember, who purged Russia of the Jewish oligarchs and is reviving the Orthodox Church throughout the former, godless Soviet Union.)

    Only by a return to Sacred Monarchy and its alliance with the historic Church, fashioning a non-Judaized culture, can modern man live and breathe again.

    For in the polluted air of Jewish hegemony—with its negation of Christ’s Resurrection, and in its stead, homage before Holocaust monuments to the Jewish dead—a choking gasp for resuscitation is modern man’s last hope for survival.

  2. Brother Nathanael May 27, 2012 @ 9:53 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family -

    I mean what I say:

    “Modern man is CUT OFF from the one entity by which the “isolation of his soul” can be united to sacred corporate community, The Historic Church.”

    And I ALSO mean when I say: “The isolation of the soul begins with the rise of Jewish hegemony over Western Society.”

    Look at the ROT that JEW ‘democracy’ has brought the Western world: Sexual depravity; consumerism; the economic man; endless wars for the Jews; the INDIVIDUAL “Goy” and ON and On with ALL THE Jewish ROT that has polluted our once Christian civilization.
    —-
    ON ANOTHER NOTE

    I am at my wits end trying to figure out what I need to do to raise enough money so that I can have some breathing room regarding financial needs.

    (So very few out of tens of thousands of readers & viewers donate to me.)

    It’s the end of the month and once again I sweat it out how I can pay all the Bills.

    I have chosen NOT to advertise on Real Jew News because it “junks” up the site.

    Do any of you have any ideas what I can do to breathe freely regarding continual financial straights?

    UNTIL IDEAS COME … Please Consider Helping Me Financially To Continue:

    To Donate Using PayPal Simply CLICK: ***IT WILL WORK***

    https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=Q5ZHDE2BRW5AG

    OR: http://brothernathanaelfoundation.org/ (PayPal Button On Top Right)

    To Donate Using Click & Pledge CLICK:

    https://co.clickandpledge.com/sp/d1/default.aspx?wid=36313

    Donations By MAIL:

    The Brother Nathanael Foundation; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    PS - I am now on FaceBook! Check it out @ http://www.facebook.com/BrotherNathanael

    ALSO - Many THANKS to those who send in “cash” donations. They DO come in SECURELY and INTACT. I DID get some more “cash” donations this week. Thank You!

  3. Alice May 27, 2012 @ 11:01 pm

    Wow, brilliant reporting once again, and well-timed, as we remember all Americans who made the ultimate sacrifice fighting unnecessary Jewish wars.

    It frustrates me that most people who exalt our war veterans as American heroes don’t have the faintest clue of why these wars were really fought in the first place, and who profited from them.

    Yes, American war veterans should be honored, but in so honoring them, are we losing sight of the fact that these wars should have never been fought, and their sacrifices never been made in the first place?

  4. james-5 May 28, 2012 @ 1:17 am

    Happy is the man who cuts open the belly of the enemy and dashes their babies against the wall !–crucify them crucify them all !!

    -Bring back the ancient call from Gaza to Canada !–force the oxen’s head down and MAKE IT EAT THE GRASS !

    -As for the lilies of the field and the swallows of the air–turn them into golden shekles!

    -Work them till they die !–So are the goy condemned !

  5. Mission Impossible May 28, 2012 @ 3:34 am

    Brother Nathanael,

    I suspect there are many men watching your recent superlative videos and listening intently to the clarity and wisdom of the narratives they contain, who are finding themselves being filled with love and admiration for you.

    Of course, I mean the healthy, natural, and clean love that a normal man can have for an exemplary brother.

    In other words, there are surely grown men in your audience who, in addition to openly loving their own Fathers and filial Brothers, are also sensing that you too are worthy of a Brother’s love.

    As I have stated on a few occasions already, I am not an authentic believer in Christianity, but I do greatly respect the life and example of Jesus. And thanks in no small part to you, I now see the Orthodox Church as the only truly convincing form of Christianity left to mankind.

    While at the same time (and if this is not too confusing and contradictory) I also hold resolute sympathies and admiration for Europe’s native religious system, which today is often referred to as Asatru: a much maligned and misrepresented belief system (more ancient, incidentally, and far less complex than Hinduism!)

    Having said that, I also acknowledge (as you have often reminded) that it was a Christian Europe, where the Church was revered and listened to, which enjoyed true technological greatness, cultural pride, racial consistency, economic stability, peace, and social tranquility (in this imperfect world).

    The religiously inspired, purely Germanic, and infinitely beautiful music of Bach (e.g., Jesu, Joy of Man’s Desiring; Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott; Sheep May Safely Graze, and O Haupt voll Blut und Wunden) surely confirms the purity of this influence.

    Let us hope that in the months immediately ahead, many more of your readers will cancel all their payments and subscriptions to the products and services provided (for their own mental slavery) by the Devil’s Spawn, in favor of sending to you those Federal Reserve Notes saved … in order that they may help with your unavoidable operating expenses.

    Just as soon as I get myself on a even keel, I shall be mailing you a modest contribution.

    It is the least I can do for all your hard work, and for consistently inspiring and attracting reader comments on your article pages, of the highest quality … of a higher quality in fact than I have seen anywhere, including all the so-called major international newspapers and magazines. For quality and enlightenment, nothing beats the RJN website.

    So, appreciations again to you, and to the many regular Commentators contributing here for the generous edification of others.

    This website is indeed, truly exemplary!

  6. Wotan May 28, 2012 @ 3:45 am

    Dear Bro Nat,

    Congrats on this theme, which all too clearly and rightly is directed toward misled and confused souls on various platforms who do not understand your aims and even less those of Putin, who is marching on the sharp edge of a razor blade!

  7. Nicolae May 28, 2012 @ 3:47 am

    According to the mythology of the Yakuts who live in the northeastern extremity of Siberia, in the beginning the earth was entirely covered with water. Ai-tojon (The Supreme Being) saw a bubble from which issued a voice.

    A!-tojon asked the Voice, “Who are you? Where do you come from?”

    The Voice replied, “I am the devil. I live on the earth that is under the waters.”

    Ai-tojon says: “If that is true, bring me a bit of it.”

    The devil dived and brought up some earth. Ai-tojon took it, blessed it and then laid down on it, and rested on the waters.

    The devil tried to drown him, but the more he pulled and tugged to overturn the raft God had made of earth, the larger it grew, until to his amazement and discomfort, it covered most of the waters and became this world on which the human race lives today.

    The mythology of the Tartars of the Altai is very similar to that of the Yakuts, except that their legend says that after Erlik (the Wicked One) had brought up the first earth from the depths and the Creator fashions it into dry land, the Creator orders him to dive a second time and bring up more earth.

    Erlik determined to do what the Creator did, and brought up two lots of earth, one of which he concealed in his mouth. But it swelled in size until he had to spit it out in order to prevent his choking.

    The earth he spat out God formed into the mountains and marshes and the waste lands.

    Then the Creator told Erlik, “You are now in a state of sin. You wanted to do Me an ill turn. All men who also harbour evil thoughts shall be your people; but the good men shall be my people.

    Satan, Prince of This World by William Guy Carr

    Gen 27:40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/46566146/Who-is-Esau-Edom

  8. jake May 28, 2012 @ 5:12 am

    Why is Putin not a 9/11 truther?

  9. Wotan May 28, 2012 @ 5:44 am

    jake May 28, 2012 @ 5:12 am

    Because this would be a casus belli. The only people who need a war right now are the Jews!

  10. Marina May 28, 2012 @ 6:46 am

    Dear Jake,

    This is politics. Only a foolish politician openly says what he knows. You use diplomacy to reach your goals.

    Do you think most Russians do not know who financed and armed the foreign (mostly Arab) terrorists in Chechnya?

    When Putin started off he was surrounded with real vultures and every step he made he had to watch.

    Brother Nathanael is right. His first major move was to restore the Church. He reconciled the Russian Church abroad with the Moscow Patriarchate. A very important move.

    He then built a great cathedral in Yekatirenburg on the spot where the Tsar and his family had been brutally murdered. Then he started a massive building and re-building of churches all over Russia. 23 000 thousand churches have been built and rebuilt in Russia during his and Medvedev’s time.

    He demanded from Israel that it return what used to be the property of the Russian Church before the Revolution. And Israel returned that property.

    Putin usually acts slowly and quietly, without making to much noise. It is his opponents who usually make a lot of noise about Putin’s moves.

  11. Dau Mai May 28, 2012 @ 7:20 am

    See this youtube song clip about the Russian Royal family:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qktFsWuHzxE

    French Version
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz-OShhxLfw

    It is from the movie Anastasia, but forget about the stupid story of the movie, just concern yourself with the song clip. I added the French version because it is so much more powerful because French is the ultimate European language.

    The clip is about a girl remembering back before the fall of Christianity and the Royal Families during WWI. All the people except for the peasant girl are all ghosts, murdered by Jews. It is a memory of a better world that was destroyed.

    Europe was thrown into chaos when the Jews brought down the Church and the Royal families. Losing the Royal Families was like losing the King in chess, game over. It is like a chicken without a head, thus chaos.

    Even a bad general is better than no general, because without a general there is chaos on the field.

    Note the end where she dances with her Czar. It is a very loving scene. This clip in French represents a lot of emotions that cannot be put into words.

  12. Roger May 28, 2012 @ 7:35 am

    Brother Nathaniel,

    You said that “It was Putin, remember, who purged Russia of the Jewish oligarchs…”

    Do you have an article or video that gives more detail about this event? Also does Russia not have a Jewish-controlled central bank?

  13. bubba May 28, 2012 @ 7:40 am

    If Russia was Germany ….and Germany was Russia prior to WWI….the Bolsheviks would never have won.

    By that I mean same cultures, swap land bases.

    Germany had a bad local, set up in the jaws of a vise. Hitler probably knew the odds were he could not win the war, but made it clear they were going down fighting.

    If Germany was based in Russia, there would have been many huge tactical advantages, including weather.

    Hence, the reason why the Bolsheviks chose Russia was they could catch them off guard.

    I see Putin as sequal-ing the above…He is learning the lessons of history. By restoring the Church, he will have a focused country, spiritually, physically and mentally that will know what happened with a huge chip on it shoulders.

    Hitler laid the groundwork the game plan and the sacrifice for the next Zionist attack.

    Go Putin Go !

  14. fRED May 28, 2012 @ 7:45 am

    +Brother N has again opened the door to the mind and intellect.

    What is the ‘best” form of government? The end of history, those who spout “government by and for the people” only have to look to Greece and France and see that in the face of a fiscal meltdown, the demos demands continued “benefits” from the state.

    Socialist-Democracy, Christian–Democracy, or whatever “ocracy” you choose we are reminded that the ancient Greeks warned that true Democracy was no more than mob rule.

    Democracy cannot stand in its present form and probably never will. We must confess that we are no different in our era than the times of the Peloponnesian wars when Socrates was voted guilty of corrupting the youth and denigrating the gods of Athens. He willfully drank the hemlock, because he was a Greek.

    We hear much of constitutional guarantees, but they are worth no more than those who enacted them because they too can be changed by the Amendment process, or simply the government as a whole choosing to ignore them. Need I mention more than Bush saying the Constitution was just a “***damned pieced of paper?” What arrogance!

    I have been considering for a long time that a Constitutional monarchy is probably the best form of government. Why; because those in power have their necks on the line. With a democracy, you can only vote the scoundrels out-but no laws are changed.

    Truly the French Revolution coupled with the American Revolution signaled that the winds of historic change were occurring and as the Chinese would recognize the “Mandate of Heaven” was collapsing.

    This was not a God-driven event, but driven by a group of people behind the scenes that had a long range goal in mind.

    As more than one politician has opined, MODERN history doesn’t just happen.

    All we can do at this present moment is continue to be Watchmen on the walls and sound the alarm, and tighten our seat belts. This is going to be a rough ride.

  15. Kelly May 28, 2012 @ 9:03 am

    Brother Nathanael,

    You very deftly described democracy as “any country ruled by Jews” and went on to define it as “a union ruled by synagogue and state.”

    Your statements really struck home as yesterday I received an e-mail alert informing me that the House of Representatives just quietly passed HR 4133, which unfortunately seems to legally join the US to Israel!!! Here is the article; read it and weep:

    “HOUSE PASSES HR 4133 BINDING THE US TO ISRAEL AND THEIR WAR AGENDA

    By Susanne Posel
    Occupy Corporatism

    Without any mainstream media coverage at all, the House of Representatives passed the United States – Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (USIESC).

    The USIESC, written by Eric Cantor, claims there is a need to provide Israel with unlimited military and financial aid as a result of the disturbances caused by the Arab Spring.

    Israel will have an essentially unlimited amount of funds allocated to them through the Federal Reserve Bank. The country will also enjoy an “expanded role of NATO” that consists of an “enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises.”

    The USIESC pledges the US government’s “commitment” to assist Israel in remaining a Jewish State; as well as protection from the UN if the UN Security Council resolves to hold Israel accountable to international laws.

    The US government’s counter-terrorism unit will also aid Israel by any means.

    This USIESC asserts that “supported by the American people” the US government will “repeatedly affirm the special bond between the United States and Israel” and that the two countries have “shared values and shared interests.”

    If there were ever language to suppose that there were a merging of these two nations, the USIESC fits that bill.

    The Executive Summary of USIESC says that “the following actions to assist in the defense of Israel” are:

    (1) Provide Israel such support as may be necessary to increase development and production of joint missile defense systems, particularly such systems that defend the urgent threat posed to Israel and United States forces in the region.

    (2) Provide Israel assistance specifically for the production and procurement of the Iron Dome defense system for purposes of intercepting short-range missiles, rockets, and projectiles launched against Israel.

    (3) Provide Israel defense articles and defense services through such mechanisms as appropriate, to include air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions.

    (4) Allocate additional weaponry and munitions for the forward-deployed United States stockpile in Israel.

    (5) Provide Israel additional surplus defense articles and defense services, as appropriate, in the wake of the withdrawal of United States forces from Iraq.

    (6) Strengthen efforts to prevent weapons smuggling into Gaza pursuant to the 2005 Agreement on Movement and Access following the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and to protect against weapons smuggling and terrorist threats from the Sinai Peninsula.

    (7) Offer the Israeli Air Force additional training and exercise opportunities in the United States to compensate for Israel’s limited air space.

    (8) Expand Israel’s authority to make purchases under the Foreign Military Financing program on a commercial basis.

    (9) Seek to enhance the capabilities of the United States and Israel to address emerging common threats, increase security cooperation, and expand joint military exercises.

    (10) Encourage an expanded role for Israel within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), including an enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises.

    (11) Support extension of the long-standing loan guarantee program for Israel, recognizing Israel’s unbroken record of repaying its loans on time and in full.

    (12) Expand already-close intelligence cooperation, including satellite intelligence, with Israel.

    USIESC goes on to claim that: “Iran, (3) which has long sought to foment instability and promote extremism in the Middle East, is now seeking to (4) exploit the dramatic political transition underway in the region to undermine governments traditionally aligned with the United States and support extremist political movements in these countries.”

    On the contrary, Israel and the US have been the biggest proponents of violence toward unprovoked nations in recent times.

    The collaboration of the US, Israel and NATO, with help from CIA operatives al-Qaeda and other US funded terrorist groups, have synthesized fake revolutions (i.e. the Arab Spring) to destabilize foreign governments and force regime changes.

    To Read more:

    ( http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/05/26/house-passes-hr-4133-binding-the-us-to-israel-and-their-war-agenda/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29 )

  16. kmarie May 28, 2012 @ 10:54 am

    My Memorial Day Weekend contribution to our Brother Nathanael, Christ-loving evangelist, is in the mail.

    Well-documented information on RJN could easily be reacted to with fear or depression.

    Fear, sometimes defined as “a cry for love,” actually FEEDS the life-destroying, anti-Christ spirit which we want to resist.

    There is a saying that ONLY LOVE IS REAL. This comes from the belief that GOD IS LOVE and that God is the only ultimate source of reality.

    Anyway, “just for today,” I want to respond in LOVE rather than in fear.

    So my contribution to Brother Nathanael is in the mail.

  17. Citizenfitz May 28, 2012 @ 12:21 pm

    I’d forgotten that WWI brought down the Greek monarchy too.

    “…Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
    The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
    The best lack all conviction, while the worst
    Are full of passionate intensity….” W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming

  18. Rachel May 28, 2012 @ 12:44 pm

    On HR 4133: sample from Snordelhans artistic contributions:

    Memo to All Christians.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGgARDuVynU

    How Can so Many People be so Incredibly Blind?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzkuak7QN-A

    We Need Your Kids To Die! Please.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WGhwijWBEQ

  19. Citizenfitz May 28, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

    In memoriam, Captain Waskow

    Captain Henry Waskow was a young man from Belton, Texas His parents were German immigrants. Had they not moved to America, their famous son would likely have been fighting for Hitler….

    http://citizenfitz09.blogspot.com/

  20. The Elder of Zyklon-B May 28, 2012 @ 1:33 pm

    Brother Nathanael steps up to the plate once again and the bases are loaded. Here’s the pitch, WHACK!

    It’s out of here! Another GRAND SLAM historical video directly related to our present talmudized condition.

    How in the world does he do it? He does it with help and guidance which is out of this demonically controlled world.

    He does it by the grace, wisdom, guidance, and power of Christ The Redeemer. He still needs our help and support. These wonderful projects he comes up with take time and yes, MONEY.

    Anyone out there who cares enough to step up to the plate and lend the man a hand?

    Worth reading and hearing again and again kameraden:

    “Only by a return to Sacred Monarchy and its alliance with the historic Church, fashioning a non-Judaized culture, can modern man live and breathe again.

    For in the polluted air of Jewish hegemony—with its negation of Christ’s Resurrection, and in its stead, homage before Holocaust monuments to the Jewish dead—a choking gasp for resuscitation is modern man’s last hope for survival.”

  21. George Cook May 28, 2012 @ 1:48 pm

    Brother,

    I know how you feel. I used to get the Truth At Last newspaper and every month put out 200 copies. I would put out Truth tracts and leaflets and had to buy them and pay for the gas and risk being arrested in Easton, Md. for they put a bounty on our heads $5 for each leaflet.

    One night we started putting them out and heard tires screeching. We hadn’t put out more than 50 and the Cops got the call. We had to leave town.

    So I know about time and financially how it affects you. I just can’t understand why each reader can’t put a dollar or two in an envelope and mail it to you. Maybe they need an addressed envelope mailed to them.

  22. Carmen May 28, 2012 @ 1:56 pm

    Roger, Moscow has the Rothschild banking system. Find it on their site in the map section.

  23. Bill Massey May 28, 2012 @ 2:00 pm

    Brother,

    When the Jews want something done they kill people. They killed Czars, diplomats, mayors, Generals, and SS men and Red Cross nurses by the thousands. Not one politician has been smoked, as bad as these bastards have screwed this country the last 100 years.

    Imagine someone whacking a politician for passing the Federal Reserve? Or the countless wars or giving billions of our money to Israel? Or for voting to increase immigration to purposely make us more brown.

    Or for letting the BATF bomb the Trade Towers, Oklahoma City, murdering children in Waco and then 9/11. It just keeps getting worse and worse.

    I have emailed the FBI and told them about all the evidence they have missed. About not arresting the BATF and George Bush. I know letter writing means nothing, but if they knew millions knew they were in on 9/11 and by removing the videos from cameras and allowing Silverstein to blow up Tower Seven, then they were involved too.

    No they go after Edgar Steele and Matt Hale and frame them.

    You notice nothing on Jew media about this nuke plant about to destroy North America or the tens of thousands of deformed babies in the Middle East.

  24. Has C. May 28, 2012 @ 2:14 pm

    Dear Brother,

    Thank you for today’s Sermon. You have skillfully managed to pack many important and interconnected themes into a mere three minutes.

    The Man of today deprived of God and ruled insidiously by his worst enemies. A truly tragic plight rather than a dilemma.

    I meet and interact with disoriented, blinded wretches who desperately cling to their material possessions and maintain they are contented, even happy.

    I grew tired of trying to enlighten them (4th category). I am not as strong and determined as yourself. What or who is going to provide that ”choking gasp”?

    Could it be less than a general breakdown with inevitable interracial violence, poverty and finally – a reemergence of order based on old, time-proven values?
    ————————————————————-

    An afterthought:

    I find it difficult to believe that the Jews who totally controlled Russia for decades were somehow removed from power without extreme bloodshed.

    Aren’t these the same Jews who murdered Kennedy for attempting to tamper with their central bank? They gave up so easily? How in the world did mother Russia burn off the blood sucking leeches? It looks like a miracle.

    On the internet one can find the information that the Rothschilds own the Central Bank of Russia. Is it true? This would be a crucial piece of the Russian puzzle, right?
    http://www.blacklistednews.com/?news_id=7913.

    ————————————————————–

    Can anybody recommend a good book about the history of the Byzantine Empire? There are tons of old books at the Internet Archive on the subject:

    http://archive.org/search.php?query=Byzantine%20history%20AND%20mediatype%3Atexts

    ————————————————————–
    I am sending a contribution this week, Brother - the usual “postcard”.

  25. wolf911 May 28, 2012 @ 2:38 pm

    Putin looks like a strong man, however for a strong leader why does he allow this to happen?

    Islam in Moscow on the rampage, worse than any other European city, shivers your spine :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aihmte1DWvA

    If only it could be true, +BN, that indeed Putin would be our model, spiritually, economically and racially… but I have some doubts when I see these images.

    He could kick this vermin out in a wink if he was really a nationalist.

    I also don’t understand all those hidden tactics, if he is against Jewish oppression why turn around the point and just go for it, for a real nationalist Russia that protects its people.

    They do have the atom bomb don’t they, no to worry to meet with Qaddafi or Hitler’s fate in reprisal?

  26. Neophit May 28, 2012 @ 3:08 pm

    Russian government has also allocated 2 million USD from the state budget for the restoration of hundreds of Serbian Orthodox monasteries and churches in Kosovo damaged by Albanian/KLA (CIA funded) extremists, and from the bombing of Serbia & Montenegro/(aka Former Yugoslavia) in 1999.

    The bombing destroyed many Serbian churches/monasteries and cemeteries. However, in subsequent years, Albanian separatists in Kosovo and Metohija destroyed even more Orthodox monasteries.

    The Serbs are an Eastern Orthodox nation (like Russia), and the cultural and spiritual monuments in Kosovo are the foundation and the Jerusalem of the Serbian nation.

    Therefore, the allocation of the funds needed for reconstruction is of great importance, both in terms of relations between our countries, and in terms of the spiritual rebirth of the modern Serbian nation. The Serbs always think well of Russia, seeing it as the defender of their interests.

    In addition to direct financial assistance, Russia will send architects, engineers, designers, engineers, and art historians to Kosovo. These experts aren’t only going to assess the extent of the damage; they’re going to begin restoration work on damaged sites.

    http://oi48.tinypic.com/n3ofns.jpg

  27. Mike Johnson May 28, 2012 @ 3:17 pm

    Seeing what they did to Germany and we can’t stop it means we should just leave the country.

    We know what we should do right now, but we can’t say it.

    We can’t inform people. We can’t tell them what to do. So when the chaos starts it will be swift and certain and we will try to get the word out, but it might be useless to try when everyone is scared and the shooting starts.

  28. Bill Smith May 28, 2012 @ 3:22 pm

    @Has C. A good book to read about the holocaust is The Holocaust Made In Russia by C. W. Porter.

    In my opinion, the Jews still control the banks in Russia and the media.

    Which means Putin can and will be moot very soon. The bankers can hold back money and he can’t build anything. They can tell us in the media Putin is homosexual. Or that he has sex with prostitutes.

    The Jews in Russia don’t care about Putin. Putin should have already told us to get our missiles and troops out of their hemisphere.

  29. John Thomas May 28, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

    fRED

    A better government would be common people like farmers and carpenters serve for one year and then back to civilian life. By having many people involved in the process it sheds more light and nobody would serve one year and vote for something so destructive for their country.

    They would not want to face their peers for the next 50 years. Every four years the people fall for it. They go to vote and almost everytime vote out many incumbents if that party can be blamed for the problems. We think problem solved when in fact nothing changed.

  30. Chris Moore May 28, 2012 @ 3:44 pm

    In the following linked essay, I argue that Zionist Jews are the equivelent of Islamists, and should be compelled to Israel:

    Why Jewish Zionists don’t belong in Western civilization, and how they can be voluntarily compelled to Israel
    http://www.libertariantoday.com/2012/05/why-jewish-zionists-dont-belong-in.html

    I don’t believe that the baby (democracy) should be thrown out with the bathwater (Jewish Zionist toxins).

    I recognize not desiring that Zionist Jews be converted conflicts with certain Christian doctrine, but I honestly don’t believe the core of Zionist Judaism is capable of salvation, because it is comprised of sociopaths who could never undergo an authentic conversion, and if forced, would merely operate as subversive crypto-Jews (e.g. conversos).

    Hence, I don’t think it makes sense to even desire the presences of hard core Zionist Jews in Western civilization, because all they will do is warp Christendom.

    They now have Israel, they have no need to linger or dwell in the West, and they’re not wanted here except by other criminals, subversives and sociopaths who seek out Jewish accomplices, which is how Western civlization and democracy have been polluted…by criminal Jewry teaming with and leading other factions of broiling malcontents, sociopaths and charlatans (e.g. Communists, cultural Marxists, money-worshippers, neoliberals, neocons, Judeo-Christian Zionists, etc).

    The presences of Zionist Jewry in the West provides these others expertise, leadership, organizational models, technique, encouragement, aid and sustenance.

    Better to send the Zionists off to hash it out with the Islamists (on their own dime) so we can go about rebuilding our civilization without having to contend with Talmudic masters of subversion and treachury burrowing away from the inside out.

  31. Has C. May 28, 2012 @ 4:05 pm

    @Bill Smith May 28, 2012 @ 3:22 pm

    Yes, a great book; just documents showing the absurdity of the hoax.

  32. Has C. May 28, 2012 @ 5:59 pm

    A little off the subject.

    I recommend a very good video by Anthony Lawson:

    “Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?” (15 min.)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eptPeSmA37U

  33. Mark May 28, 2012 @ 6:11 pm

    I must take the road less traveled with regards to Monarchies. The reasons are broad but very deep.

    The idea of curtsey and bowing is annoying enough. But the utter nonsense that someone’s blood is more worthy than others is detestable on it’s face.

    And when we research these bloodlines we find some very contemptable and horrid charaters.

    And I personally have issues with the Russian Czar(s). It was Russia who threatened a blockade of California, allying himself with the criminal Abraham Lincoln.

    Thus interfering with the internal affairs of a war that had nothing to do with Russia. Or did it? What was promised Russia by blockading or attacking Confederates in California and Arizona? Hmmm. Could it have been Lincoln’s bankers?

    And what kind of out of touch Russian Monarchy could not see the swelling opposition in the Ukraine or Siberia. I’ll tell you who. A despot, thats who.

  34. Seraphim May 28, 2012 @ 6:36 pm

    Actually the real and only enemy of USrael is Russia.

    For the Talmudists “The autocrat of Russia is the Gog Magog foretold by Ezechiel” forever!

  35. Sandra May 28, 2012 @ 7:38 pm

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/12/tikkun-olam/

    Tikkun Olam*

    (Ekaterinburg, Russia, 17 July 1918)

    His mouth agape, as though still asking questions,
    the Tsar lies at the end of his long reign.
    (Blue lips almost struggle to explain,
    caught in the halfway realm of last expressions.)
    The Empress sprawls, hands crossing her stained bodice.
    Behind her rest the bayoneted heirs,
    blood in pools around their jewelled stares.
    Yurovsky stands above the heap of bodies.

    A Chekist practiced in the art of killing,
    he commends his men as gun smoke settles.
    Their trigger-fingers, though, are cocked and curled,

    their executioner eyes more than willing—
    all of them, like him, poor boys from shtetls,
    still eager to help mend the broken world.

    * Hebrew for “the mending of the world”

  36. KathJuliane May 28, 2012 @ 7:47 pm

    Dear Wotan and Has C,

    I hope you find the linked article at the very bottom of interest. Wotan, there is a side-story which even involves Kaiser Germany which you may be able to see.

    And wow, Mark, are you way off track on history.

    The Russian Navy anchored officially as fleet visitors in both San Francisco Bay and New York Harbor to deter the British and French military powers from setting anchor for an invasion, to be there if the Union forces formally requested assistance through diplomatic channels, such as for patrolling the coastal waters and such for anti-piracy and contraband interdiction. It never came to that.

    Pending certain, limited conditions which would trigger the opening of secret orders, the Russian Navy was here as also a protective measure to keep Russia’s major enemy, Britain and her navy, from destroying the Russian fleet in the turmoils ongoing overseas.

    The Union ran their own blockades against England and France, not Russia.

    And the Californians handled their own affairs regarding the Civil War, not Russia.

    California’s involvement in the American Civil War included sending gold east, recruiting volunteer combat units to replace regular forces in territories of the Western United States, maintaining and building numerous camps and fortifications, suppressing secessionist activity and securing the New Mexico Territory against the Confederacy.

    The State of California did not send its units east, but many citizens traveled east and joined the Union Army there, some of whom became famous. California’s Volunteers also conducted many operations against the native peoples within the state and in the other Western territories of the Departments of the Pacific and New Mexico.

    Following the Gold Rush California was settled primarily by Midwestern and Southern farmers, miners and businessmen. Democrats dominated the state from its foundation.

    Southern Democrats sympathetic to secession, although a minority in the state, were a majority in Southern California and Tulare County, and were in large numbers in San Joaquin, Santa Clara, Monterey, and San Francisco counties.

    California was home for powerful businessmen who played a significant role in Californian politics through their control of mines, shipping, finance, and the Republican Party but were a minority party until the secession crisis.

    In the beginning of 1861, as the secession crisis began, the secessionists in San Francisco made an attempt to separate the state and Oregon from the Union, which failed.

    Southern California, with a majority of discontented Californios and Southern secessionists, had already voted for a separate Territorial government and formed militia units, but were kept from secession after Fort Sumter and by Federal troops drawn from the frontier forts of the District of Oregon, and District of California, (primarily Fort Tejon and Fort Mojave).

    Patriotic fervor swept California after the attack on Fort Sumter, providing the manpower for Volunteer Regiments recruited mainly from the pro-Union counties in the north of the State.

    When the Democratic party split over the war, Republican supporters of Lincoln took control of the state in the September elections.

    Volunteer Regiments were sent to occupy pro-secessionist Southern California and Tulare County, leaving them generally powerless during the war itself. However some Southern Californians traveled east to join the Confederate Army, evading Union patrols and hostile Apache.

    Others remaining in the state attempted to outfit a privateer to prey on coastal shipping, and late in the war two groups of partisan rangers were formed but none were successful.

    The Russian Navy never fired any shots at Americans much less your “Confederates” in California, as the circumstances never warranted them opening their secret orders to fire on anyone.

    The orders were to be opened only in case of direct war interventions on behalf of the Confederacy by Britain and/or any European Powers.

    The Civil War was not simply an internal dispute, because England and France, and their silent partners Spain and Hapsburg Mexico either had their hand in it through their proxies in the Confederacy, and were waiting on the sidelines to pick the USA apart like vultures.

    If it wasn’t for Tzarist Russia, World War I would have erupted 70 years earlier on American soil, and America would have been dismantled between England, France and Spain and Hapsburg Mexico. One attempt by these European Powers already occured during the War of 1812 during the Jackson White House, and Russia intervened on the side of the young United States that time, too.

    Has C wrote: “Bismarck was a great statesman but not infallible. He admired Lincoln - some called Lincoln the butcher of the South. Do you?

    “His saying about the Press might have been valid in his times but would you say that it is now in “BRD” or USA?”

    Has C,

    Your hatred of Lincoln is duly noted. And like your ambivalence about being part German and part Polish, consider this…there were members of the Fancher branch of my family tree which fought on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line.

    What do I do? I legitimately qualify in strict lineal descent to join Daughters of Union Veterans of the Civil War. If the United Daughters of the Confederacy ever invited me to join, I would qualify as a collateral blood descendant of women and men who honorably served in the Army, Navy, or Civil Service of the Confederate States of America, or gave material support.

    The Civil War was very ugly, and is still a very painful subject today, particularly because of Reconstruction and its rotten “scalawags and carpetbaggers” invading from the North, and for its utter ruin, post-war chaos, criminality and anarchy. The Confederates honorably surrended, accepting all the political conditions, even the emancipation of the slaves, and yet these fine Confederate soldiers were still treated shabbily and dishonorably.

    The Confederate States got a really rotten deal after the civil war and the Reconstruction Period was in no way handled properly, particularly in not giving the Southerners a chance to rebuild their own society and have a hand in maintaining law and order. Instead, the Southerners were emasculated and humiliated with the Federal occupation.

    But Lincoln had been assassinated by then, and the theory that it was a British conspiracy involving John Wilkes Booth and the others running the Confederate underground 5th column in the North has some merit.

    Booth was a Confederate sympathizer vehement in his denunciation of the Lincoln Administration and outraged by the South’s defeat in the American Civil War. He strongly opposed the abolition of slavery in the United States and Lincoln’s proposal to extend voting rights to recently emancipated slaves.

    Booth and a group of co-conspirators originally plotted to kidnap Lincoln, but later planned to kill him, Vice President Andrew Johnson, and Secretary of State William Seward in a bid to help the Confederacy’s cause.

    Although Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia had surrendered four days earlier, Booth believed the war was not yet over because Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston’s army was still fighting the Union Army. Of the conspirators, only Booth was completely successful in carrying out his respective part of the plot.

    Seward was wounded but recovered; Lincoln died the next morning from a single gunshot wound to the back of the head.

    Here is an interesting part. *Booth’s parents, the noted British Shakespearean actor Junius Brutus Booth* and his mistress Mary Ann Holmes, came to the United States from England in June 1821. They purchased a farm in Maryland, where John Wilkes Booth was born in a four-room log house on May 10, 1838, the ninth of ten children.

    Junius Brutus Booth’s wife, Adelaide Delannoy Booth, was granted a divorce in 1851 on grounds of adultery, and Holmes legally wed John Wilkes Booth’s father on May 10, 1851, the youth’s 13th birthday.

    The missing puzzle piece of any motive behind Britain wanting to see Lincoln dead is out in the wind, unless the US-Russian Entente is factored in. Lincoln and Russia both hated Jewish Bankers and the City of London.

    Great Britain hated Russia, and Britain was ever itchy to get back some, or all of her “Colonies” which had escaped her clutches. Britain was part of the cotton trade triangle. Southern cotton was sent to the English cotton cloth mills, then traded back to the States as well as traded throughout the British Empire.

    Britain was also annoyed that Russia had ceded to the USA by treaty her claims on that plum called California and disputed claims to Oregon Territory, not to mention some of the rest of the West Coast all the way up to what was solidly Russian Alaska (until 1867).

    Britain got a hold of recent British expats or former subjects on American soil, forming an espionage network and 5th column integrated with the underground Confederates.

    I posted the below article in full several years ago in 14 parts in comments on RJN. It is chock full of little known American history, particularly the “global” aspects of the Civil War, which has been flushed down the memory hole, and the war’s place in international politics of the day.

    I knew something of this history by virtue of living in No California, studying local Orthodox California history, which at one time was also part of Russian America until 1850, when the California Republic declared independence established itself as a constitutional republic.

    Spanish, later Mexican California extended only as far as San Francisco, where the two empires met. Fort Ross on the coast of North America, now known as Sonoma County, Ca, is really “Fort Rus,” or more correctly “Krepostʹ Ross” in Russian. (No, it was not named after a mysterious person.)

    It was the hub of the southernmost Russian settlements in North America in between 1812 to 1842. It has been the subject of archaeological investigation, restoration and is a National Historic Landmark and on the National Register of Historic Places. It is part of California’s Fort Ross State Historic Park.

    The fort’s Orthodox Christian chapel was also restored by the California Historical Society.

    Fort Ross is a landmark in the history of European imperialism. The Spanish expansion went west across the Atlantic Ocean and the Russian expansion went east across Siberia and the Pacific Ocean.

    In the early nineteenth century, the two waves of expansion met on the opposite side of the world along the Pacific Coast of California, with Russia arriving from the north and Spain from the south. The United States of America arrived in 1846 from the east.

    26 days before the US Army arrived to occupy the territory, a handful of settlers in Sonoma, California revolted from Mexico, and declared the independence of the California Republic, better known as “The Bear Flag Republic.”

    It is probably one of the few bloodless wars of independence ever in known history that approached Greek comedy, and could probably have only happened in California the way it did. You kind of have to be a Californian to know what I mean.

    I’m happy to find the link still alive. It was written around 1992, just after Glasnost and Perestroika, and before the Yale School of Economic Rape, Pillage, and Plunder of the Oligarchs took off, aka Clinton’s “privitization” scheme.

    See if you can find where the Jewish/Rothschild Bankers should be inserted.

    THE US-RUSSIAN ENTENTE THAT SAVED THE UNION

    by Konstantin George

    Americans also do not know the fascinating story that is the subject of this report: the story of the Union’s alliance with the Russia of Czar Alexander II–who freed the serfs in 1861, two years before Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.

    Russia’s alliance with the United States was absolutely critical to the Union victory in the Civil War, the defeat of the British strategic design. The lessons of this fight are most relevant to the tasks facing both nations today.
    ~~~

    The American Civil War was a global political war that came–several times–within a hair’s breadth of global shooting war. The global battle lines were drawn between two international alliances: the Union and the Russian Empire, arrayed against the Confederacy in alliance with England and France–the Russell-Palmerston alliance with their tool, “Petit” Louis Napoleon (III).

    The Union’s survival and ultimate victory was achieved in part thanks to the influential “American” faction in Russia, to whose outlook Alexander II tended. This faction stuck to its guns, despite all British threats, to ensure the survival and development of the United States for the common interest of Russia and America.

    At several of the most critical junctures of the Civil War, the Lord Russell-Petit Napoleon axis was on the verge of declaring war on the Union. Each time, they were forced to weigh the consequences of a fully mobilized Russia’s declaration of war on England and France. Russia’s huge land armies were ready to roll over the Ottoman Empire and India, thus ending British political domination of an area extending in a great arc from the Balkans through the Middle East to London’s subcontinental “jewel” of India.

    Had Russia not lined up with the Union, a wavering London-dominated Bismarckian Germany, with no anti-British continental powers nearby, would have been able to swing nationalist elements in the German leadership into joining Britain and France as a junior partner.

    The fact that Russia allied with the Union and mobilized to fight if necessary, guaranteed that if a global war erupted, German national interests, which could not tolerate the elimination of the United States and Russia and a Europe under the complete domination of England and Petit Napoleon, would lawfully assert their control over German policy and move against London.

    In short, the “concert of powers” rigged game that had characterized European affairs since the Congress of Vienna would be over. The means of British political control over the continent would have exploded in the faces of Russell and Palmerston.

    The cornerstone of Britain’s operational policy, from no later than 1860 on, was to dismember both the United States and Russia. This was the prelude to enacting a “new world order,” devoid of sovereign nation states, an order centered on a British-controlled Grand Confederacy, labeled by British policymakers “The United States of Europe.”

    What was achieved during the Civil War by the two “superpowers” was the consummation of a quarter-century-long bitter struggle by factions in the United States and Russian against the London-orchestrated political machines in their respective nations.

    From 1844 to 1860, British agents of influence repeatedly sabotaged earlier potentialities for the alliance to develop. It was a quarter-century punctuated with missed opportunities and tough lessons learned, as a result of which the strategic perceptions and capacities for action of the foremost of the U.S. Whigs and their Russian counterparts were shaped and increasingly perfected.

    The foundation of U.S.-Russian collaboration was laid in the 1763-1815 period. It was the product of the political influence exerted within Russia by the networks organized by Benjamin Franklin in the Russian Academy of Science (whose leading members were followers of the tradition of technological progress established by the collaboration of Gottfried Leibniz and Peter the Great) and through the American Philosophical Society.

    In the period from 1776 to 1815, Russia twice played a crucial role in safeguarding the existence of America. During the Revolutionary War, the acceptance of Epinus’ draft of a Treaty of Armed Neutrality by Russian Premier Count Panin was not only key in thwarting Britain’s plans for building an anti-American coalition in Europe, but also marked a signal triumph by the Russian friends of Benjamin Franklin, in wresting political hegemony away from the pro-British Prince Potemkin.

    In the War or 1812, Russia, under Czar Alexander I, submitted a near-ultimatum to England to hastily conclude an honorable peace with the United States and abandon all English claims of territorial aggrandizement.

    The American negotiators were the first to confirm that only the application of Russian pressure produced the sudden volte-face in Britain’s attitude that achieved the Treaty of Ghent.

    Read: http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/russcwar.htm

  37. Kiimm May 28, 2012 @ 7:53 pm

    “The answer my friend. . . is blowin in the wind . . . the answer is blowin in the wind . . . . ”

    And, “it doesn’t take a weather man to know which way the wind blows!” :-)

  38. Stewart Davies May 28, 2012 @ 9:20 pm

    The history of the Jews is the definitive example of “the higher you are, the further you fall.”

    This applies not only to the loss of pre-eminence in the world, but also to their fall from grace. No people other than the Jews could collectively be afflicted by such corruption.

    The Jews were chosen by God to reveal the Messiah to the world.

    As it is now, it is the Jews who will introduce the Antichrist. Just as “salvation will come from the Jews”, so to will the Man of Perdition.

  39. Steven Rowlandson May 28, 2012 @ 9:29 pm

    The best form of government is a properly educated Christian monarchy that is dedicated to the task of governing, not going into debt and sets the right example for the people to follow.

    The only thing better would be the leadership of Jesus Christ himself.

    Party politics from a moral and fiscal stand point has been an abysmal failure and the work of the devil.

  40. Heinrik Von Manshtein May 28, 2012 @ 9:35 pm

    Wow Brother Nate!

    Your report could not be more timely, as the Russian people, it seems, will be called upon once again to pay a tremendous sacrifice in confronting evil, first when the Wall Street Zionist inspired NS juggernaut rolled across the Russian border on June 16 1941, the Russian People paid a tremendous price estimated 20 million dead.

    Has God Called on the Russian people to Sacrifice again? As it seem only Russia seem to be standing up to the Zionist juggernaut as it crushes humanity in every corner of the Globe.

    We have already seen the Zionist captive Nations–so called NATO–encircling Russia with Missile bases.

    Is God unfair to hand Russia this tremendous burden once again? Who are we to question God!

    Maybe we can only hope that this time victory will be swift and the sufferation not last 3 1/2 years as foretold by our brother John in the book of Revelations.

    We should all pray for Mr. Putin as he faces tremendous evil.

  41. Sandra May 28, 2012 @ 9:55 pm

    Great news!

    It looks like Brother Nathanael will be on Deanna Spingola’s RBN radio show June 14 12-1 pm est

    http://www.spingola.com/June2012.html

  42. Seraphim May 28, 2012 @ 10:17 pm

    Russia was emerging from the criminal Crimean War in which the USA was on her side.

    Noblesse oblige.

  43. Hans May 28, 2012 @ 10:23 pm

    If the mass media praises something from dawn to dusk it is worth to question it.

    When democracy is so good, why don’t you have democracy in a company ? Every company has a boss. Or in military, also no democracy there. Would be an interesting experiment to hold elections in a platoon and everybody can decide what to do.

    I mean, if every idiot is allowed to vote it ends all in chaos. Democracy is, when 10 unskilled workers tell a professor what to do.

    Or in a hospital also no democracy. The chief physician doesn’t ask the janitor, the cleaners and the nurses for their opinion when he has to do a surgery.

    Democracy simply doesn’t work.

    And finally we don’t have a democracy, we have a tightly organised plutocracy with a hierarchy of secret networks which receives orders from top to down. But from the wrong people.

    By the way has anybody noticed the startling similarity of Nicholas II in the picture above with Medwedew ? They look like doppelgangers.

  44. Paul87 May 28, 2012 @ 10:49 pm

    @Heinrik Von Manshtein

    I believe thats just a conservative figure.

    Most historians claim its at least 60-65 million deaths.

    Add in the stuff that Mao did and the figures go sky high.

    This number is much larger than the Holocaust figures, yet, little to no Americans seem to care.

    (Probably busy watching Speilburgs films or some Celebrity show.

  45. etterling May 28, 2012 @ 10:51 pm

    To Sandra:

    What an excellent lecture on History, although, I would like to make clear that Spain’s attitude toward the US was justified on precedent grounds.-

    At the beginning of the XIX Century, meanwhile Spain was fighting against the French occupation, the US, with the excuse of Spanish support of Seminole tribes, took Florida from Spain.-

    The US-UK might have had their differences, but in the matter of Spain they were in complete coziness. The war against Christian Spain lasted for several centuries, since Elizabeth the Ist, including the “enlightened” French and ending with the Spanish-American War of 1898.-

    England promoted the uprising of Spanish South American colonies, with the very natural help of the US through masonic lodges, a fact well-proven with several revered patriots initiated in Freemasonry and traveling to England to be instructed in revolutionary war.-

    Proof of that is Simon Bolivar (there is a statue of him in DC) being followed by a British Brigade commanded by O´Leary till the end of his political carrier, Francisco Miranda planning from London or San Martin taken to Lima with RN Adm. Cochrane fleet.-

    The History of the Mexican Independence — it is the History of the US State Department, from the initial Morelo uprisings till the bloody suffocation of the Cristeros in the early XX Century by a masonic Mexican Government with US support.-

    As in the previous page, you admitted to have no Christian adherence, which I respect, it is hard to understand History without the ever present, either below the surface or openly, of religious motivations.-

    The war between the Jewish Diaspora and Christianity, lasting since Jesus crucifixion till today, has had many many nations, banners, characters and declared reasons but in the underlaying, the forces were and are the same.-

    Notwithstanding the Union’s defiance of the British Empire, in the end Lincoln yielded to the influence of the powers that be, and the banking lobby had their way in the matter of money issue, which means that if Lincoln won the war was just to become Rothschild´s POW.-

  46. Alice May 29, 2012 @ 12:47 am

    On a lighter note, Brother N, I laughed at seeing a photo of Dana Bash included in this video: “Born - Dana Ruth Schwartz.”

    I wonder if her estranged husband, colleague John King, is rethinking his conversion to Judaism for a marriage that only lasted a couple of years!

  47. dobrowolski73 May 29, 2012 @ 1:04 am

    Hallo Everybody,

    Maybe our time will come - end of Israel colony abroad USA. See this:

    Japan, China to drop Dollar in June: Yen-Yuan direct trading to start

    http://www.thechinamoneyreport.com/category/rise-of-the-rmb/

    “Bi-laterial trade contracts to be moved from USD to Yuan or Yen in June.”

    “There is cause and effect in global economics. You print money without constraints and and the USD will loose it’s “exorbitant privilege” as the world’s reserve currency. We are watching this historic end of the USD currency reserve status unfold in real-time.”

    Greetings,
    Martin from Poland

  48. Steven Rowlandson May 29, 2012 @ 3:24 am

    In 1905 and 1917 the Russian people were confronted by evil imported from western Europe and Wall Street.

    This evil was cloaked in the guise of democracy and socialist reform, and shortly after shed all sham and pretense and killed many tens of millions of people.

    They also looted and plundered Russia for the benefit of the revolutionary and financial elites of the world.

    This is what Democracy, Communism and the New World Order is really all about.

    Plunder, Prison, Slavery, Mass Murder and the Corruption of public morality.

    This is what you get when you exchange government by a moral man for government by a politically correct committee.

  49. Bobby May 29, 2012 @ 3:32 am

    “Isolation of the soul”. Powerful video.

  50. walt May 29, 2012 @ 5:02 am

    Dear Bro Nate,

    Excellent work as always.

    For the beginning though, it would’ve been notable to also mention the end of the Ottoman Empire from WWI as well.

    Since, as you well know, it was very essential for Zionists in making their “state”.

  51. Marina May 29, 2012 @ 6:04 am

    Folks,

    Be careful with any Western sources reporting on any events in Russia or Belarus as well. They are very biased and hardly ever reflect any truth.

    For example, they constantly talk about demographic crisis in Russia. There is no demographic crisis in Russia at the moment.

    There WAS indeed a real CRISIS in the 90s when the drunkard Yeltsin was the country’s president but the real power was in the hands of the Jewish oligarchs. This crisis, however, has been gradually arrested. Just recently we heard good news - the population increased by one million. It may not yet be a lot but it is a real progress if we consider what was happening before.

    You will, however, never hear anything about it in the Western media.

    About Islam in Russia. There are no Muslims going on the rampage in Moscow. Moscow is not another Paris or London. If you come to Moscow or Russia illegally and you look like someone from Central Asia you keep a low profile because you will be immediately deported if the police find you have no papers.

    Russia does accept some guest workers but only from former Soviet Republics which include Central Asian countries, Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Moldova, Azerbeidjan etc. However, you have to get the right kind of visa and it is not easy to get it. You need to know the language and need to pass special tests.

    There are two groups of Muslims in Russia: native Muslims and Muslims from former Soviet Republics. The first group are Russian citizens - they have always been part of Russia. The second group are treated as foreigners. It’s difficult for them to get Russian citizenship. Most of them simply come to work and leave. Only a small number - usually well educated and open-minded ones stay in Russia.

    Russia’s native Muslims are ethnically diverse, they include: Tatars, Bashkirs in the Ural region and Chechens, peoples of Dagestan, Ingush, Karachays, Circassians and a few other groups in the Caucasus region. But in the Caucasus there are also large numbers of native Christians, usually ethnic Ossetians and Abkhazians.

    Tatars are the largest Muslim group in Russia in terms of numbers. They are also the most Russianized group. More than that - there is a large number of Orthodox Christian Tatars. You can meet someone called Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov and he will be a Tatar and a Christain and you will meet someone called Rinat Akhmetovich Islamov and he will also be a Tatar and also a Christian. There are countless numbers of churches - some of them recently built - all over Tatarstan (http://www.kazan.eparhia.ru/temples/).

    Of course in the past Russia had some conflicts with its Muslim neighbors. These Muslim neighbors could be a nuisance but they never posed a real threat to the Russian Christian culture. Russia was able to deal with them. The major blows to the Russian culture came not from Muslims but from the West, from its anti-Christian ideologies which were put into by anti-Christian Westernized, mostly Jewish, ideologues.

    If we look at the situation now, we can see that the major enemy of the Russian culture and Orthodox Christianity are not Muslims but the so-called opposition which is mostly made up of Yeltsin’s former politicians, cosmopolitans, sexual perverts, radical feminists, anarchists etc.

    Needless to say, lots of them are either Jewish or have links with Jews. All of these people hate Putin and hate the Russian Church. They look up to the West for inspiration and they are the major apostles of Cultural Marxism.

    Putin’s strategy does not involve a direct attack on the Jews for being Jews. Such a strategy would be a disaster. We only have to remember how much noise was being made in the Western media when Khodorkovsky was arrested, tried and put in prison and other oligarchs had to flee. Putin was careful not to play any “anti-Semitic” card as this would give his enemies and opponents a reason to make him into another Hitler.

    There are still rich Jews in Russia but they have to be careful. No one will put them in prison just for being Jewish but they might end up behind bars for being anti-Russian or working against Russia’s national interests. So, they have to be careful what they do with the money and what deals they make and with whom.

    At the same time Putin has been giving a lot of support to the Church and the rebirth of Christianity. Religion has made a real comeback.

    Christianity is the best remedy to cure the world from the Zionist disease.

  52. etterling May 29, 2012 @ 8:01 am

    Heinrik Von Manshtein:

    “The Wall Street inspired NS juggernaut”, has recently and by several scholars aquitted AH of the responsibility you place upon him.-

    The attack on the Soviet Union was a preemtive move, Victor Suvorov (The Icebreaker), not precisely a NS sympathizer, proves with detail Stalin’s planning to attack Germany.-

    Suvorov’s pionnering work has been followed by others in Russia, Germany, Austria and the US.-

  53. Citizenfitz May 29, 2012 @ 9:43 am

    Friends,

    I dare you to take one look at this high-tech marvel of Radio Shack leftovers, papier mache and Borden’s White Glue and then deny that Americans went to the Moon!

    http://citizenfitz09.blogspot.com/2011/04/lunartics.html

  54. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 10:18 am

    More information on Operation Barbarosssa and Victor Suvorov is in this audio:

    http://reasonradionetwork.com/20120104/the-mark-weber-report-why-hitler-struck-against-soviet-russia-in-1941

    The Mark Weber Report: Why Hitler Struck Against Soviet Russia in 1941

    Important evidence has come to light in recent decades that shatters the official, endlessly repeated view that Hitler, bent on world conquest, launched a treacherous surprise attack against a peaceful Soviet Union.

    Long-suppressed documents and other detailed evidence shows that by June 1941 Soviet dictator Stalin had built the world’s largest military machine, and had deployed an enormous strike force on the western Soviet frontier, in readiness for a massive attack against Germany that would roll on to overwhelm central and western Europe.

    Hitler’s ‘Barbarossa” attack, say a growing number of historians in Russia, Germany and other countries, was actually a preventive war to forestall an imminent Soviet strike
    ………

    All of this is based on information from Victor Suvorov who was a former high level soviet military intelligence agent who defected to the UK. He wrote “Ice Breaker” and “The Chief Culprit,” two books that basically talk about how Stalin was planning on attacking and taking over Europe after the western powers exhausted themselves. And apparently Hitler’s surprise attack on the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa) ended up preventing Stalin from taking all of Europe.

    Here’s a link to his book:

    http://www.amazon.com/Icebreaker-Who-Started-Second-World/dp/0241126223
    Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War?

    And the summary: A historian, the Soviet defector Victor Suvorov tells the story of World War II as started not by Hitler, but by Stalin. He contends that Russia’s part in starting the war was very much greater and much more sinister than has hitherto been assumed. (interesting to check out the reviews for this and the book below)

    Here’s a link to Suvorov’s other book:
    http://www.amazon.com/Chief-Culprit-Stalins-Design-Jacket/dp/1591148383

    Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II

    And the summary: Bestselling author Victor Suvorov probes newly released Soviet documents and reevaluates existing material to analyze Stalin’s strategic design to conquer Europe and the reasons behind his controversial support for Nazi Germany.

    A former Soviet army intelligence officer, the author explains that Stalin’s strategy leading up to World War II grew from Vladimir Lenin’s belief that if World War I did not ignite the worldwide Communist revolution, then a second world war would be needed to achieve it. Stalin saw Nazi Germany as the power that would fight and weaken capitalist countries so that Soviet armies could then sweep across Europe.

    Suvorov reveals how Stalin conspired with German leaders to bypass the Versailles Treaty, which forbade German rearmament, and secretly trained German engineers and officers and provided bases and factories for war. He also calls attention to the 1939 nonaggression pact between the Soviet Union and Germany that allowed Hitler to proceed with his plans to invade Poland, fomenting war in Europe.

    Suvorov debunks the theory that Stalin was duped by Hitler and that the Soviet Union was a victim of Nazi aggression. Instead, he makes the case that Stalin neither feared Hitler nor mistakenly trusted him.

    Suvorov maintains that after Germany occupied Poland, defeated France, and started to prepare for an invasion of Great Britain, Hitler’s intelligence services detected the Soviet Union’s preparations for a major war against Germany. This detection, he argues, led to Germany’s preemptive war plan and the launch of an invasion of the USSR.

    Stalin emerges from the pages of this book as a diabolical genius consumed by visions of a worldwide Communist revolution at any cost–a leader who wooed Hitler and Germany in his own effort to conquer the world.

    In contradicting traditional theories about Soviet planning, the book is certain to provoke debate among historians throughout the world.

  55. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 10:18 am

    Jim Marrs has also written about this:

    http://www.rense.com/general95/did.htm

    Did Adolf Hitler Save Europe From Communism?

  56. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 10:46 am

    Some good information on Pre-Revolution Russia can be found in this audio w/Matt Raphael Johnson:

    http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110217/the-orthodox-nationalist-matt-johnson-on-the-antipodean-hour

    Here are my notes:

    - goes into what was going on in Russia before the revolution

    - info totally reminded me of Parenti’s talk on the Assassination of Julius Caesar (same idea- leader does good stuff for the people, lots of reforms, then becomes target of bankers/oligarchy)

    -info about what was going on in Russia also fits w/what larouchies have said was going on pre- ww1 (US developed American System of Economy, which was in opposition to City of London/British free trade model; countries like Russia and Germany copied American system model, both got targeted by City of London bankers (aka “British Empire”) (US wasn’t targeted by City of London bankers in ww1 b/c they already brought us back into their sphere of control w/assassination of McKinley, putting T Roosevelt in power, and setting up Fed Reserve)

    -serfs were liberated in 1861, this led to “land hunger” (everyone wanted their own land to grow stuff on)

    -Russian czar and two Russian leaders (Sergei Witte and Stolypin) wanted to do lots of development (railroads) and reforms, wanted to start a peasant land bank; the critical part of both of these projects is that they were going to be funded by state credit and NOT loans from the banksters—and this is basically what put a target on Russia and the czar

    -at that point Russia was already in debt to Sassoon bankers in France (and didn’t want to get further into debt) (apparently pre-ww1 there was infighting between Sassoons and Rothschild bankers)

    -czar and Russian leaders were going to give peasants free seed, free land, free farm tools etc (didn’t Gaddafi also do this?); Johnson says you have to look at both reforms together—the people owning land and the development of rail system, which meant they could grow their own food on their own farms and bring it to market (fyi- term “peasant” in Russia is some sort of legal term/classification, so it doesn’t mean really poor person)

    -to soften Russia up for the kill (the “Russian” revolution financed by Schiff for $20 million), city of London bankers financed Japan in Russo-Japanese war early 1900s

    -Johnson says the combination of reforms were really the last straw for the bankers (City of London/ Rothschilds), bankers felt they had to get rid of the czar asap, otherwise they would soon have millions of small land owners in Russia, an increasingly popular czar, and an economy that was getting stronger.

    -Czar had to be taken out, Orthodox Christians were targeted (quote from Heine? “they went after the throne b/c the throne protected the altar”); Johnson said this was true, and also true for French Revolution (first time I heard that; knew freemasons were involved w/French revolution)

    -no attacks on synagogues, while all churches were pulled to the ground

    -going after the Christians had nothing to do w/their loyalty to the czar b/c they also went after group of Christians called “true believers” who weren’t loyal to czar; they were also “liquidated and sent to camps”

    - after revolution, there was lots of famine/starvation, this eventually forced Lenin to change policies—he realized that he needed to let the people own land, grow own food, set market prices or they would never get out of the famine; in doing this Lenin inadvertently ended up reinvigorating peasant class of farmers like Stolypin did w/his reforms

    -then Lenin died (thought he was poisoned? Maybe the above helping of the peasant class was reason why?), then Stalin put an end to those policies (of people owning land, growing own food—started collectivization)

    -collectivization as massive wealth transfer; needed to go after re-invigorated peasantry b/c w/owning land and growing food they became a potentially well-off segment of the population that could oppose the govt

    -info on Lazar Kaganovich being major mass murderer

  57. Wotan May 29, 2012 @ 11:04 am

    Heinrik Von Manshtein May 28, 2012 @ 9:35 pm

    Dear Heinrik,

    It is an undisputed historical fact that the stalinistic Sowjet Union was ruled by the Jews.

    Surprisingly you are now suggesting that Hitler’s Germany was also ruled by the Jews. So was the US, whose FED was (and still is) occupied by them. This would mean that the Jews had already arrived at their biblical ambition to rule the world!

    Are you capable and/or willing to explain why US Jews and the Sowjet Jews should then plan and execute an attack to annihilate their top agent in Germany, who was controlling and administering that country for them so well?

    And can you explain at which meeting or by which channels Hitler got Wall Street orders to attack the Sowjet Union? Somehow this doesn’t make sense to me, but I am sure you will explain it all!

  58. Jimmy Smith May 29, 2012 @ 11:12 am

    We don’t know what goes on behind the scenes but for someone to assume that Russia didn’t want all of Europe and this would include Germany.

    Communism was freely murdering tens of millions of people from 1917 onward. No other country had said anything when the Commies took Russia and then three more countries. Do you believe for a second that the USA, England, and France didn’t know what was going on in Eastern Europe?

    So Germany not wanting this done to their country decides to prepare for war. Now some would argue that if an organization quietly invades your country and they begin murdering millions quietly with .22 bullets on the outskirts of town, this is not war.

    So if Germany prepared for war, then they are responsible for the war. If they had sat back and just let the Commies murder millions of their countrymen, then Communism could have continued taking all European countries and murdering millions and there would not have been a world war. So Germany is responsible for the war.

    No country if ruled by their people would have gotten involved with the war. They would have let the countries fight it out. Germany could allow the Commies to murder their citizens or fight Communism.

    If Germany had invaded France or Spain, like the Commies did in Eastern Europe, there would have been a war. Why were the Commies allowed to murder people for 23 years by the tens of millions and nobody said anything?

    These Allies were told what to do by the Jews and they wanted to destroy Germany. SO they were doomed either way.

  59. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 11:17 am

    For audios of Protocols of the Elders of Zion in modern English, as well as other imporant documents, please check out:

    http://lindseynarrates.wordpress.com/2012/04/

  60. Citizenfitz May 29, 2012 @ 11:54 am

    “…when the Wall Street Zionist inspired NS juggernaut rolled across the Russian border on June 16 1941….”

    ROTFLOL! Dood! Where do you go to kindergarten?

    We’re seeing lots of this now. Seemingly savvy people who get a lot of stuff right… then suddenly go left. Alex Jones, David Icke are two who come to mind.

    The Jews hated Hitler. They still hate Hitler. Why? because he seriously upset their plans for a Communist Europe.

  61. Greg Groebner May 29, 2012 @ 12:01 pm

    What a great video and text!

    This is an important topic, even here in America.

    Maybe especially here in America, during this critical time when the externals still reflect power while the internal system decays.

    Americans [in the heartland, specifically, in my opinion] need to at least become familiar with the strengths of the sacral monarchies and their role as an intrinsic glue in Western societies – rather than only swallowing anti-monarchic propaganda that is largely anti-Christian.

    Democracies just have too many vulnerabilities that can be exploited by the unscrupulous and ruthless, like a sieve trying to hold water. Democratic forms can be a beneficial mechanism on the local level, but on a national level its primary utility is that of having a power mechanism — “the People” — that can be manipulated and corrupted more quickly and easily than they can be educated in fact and in virtue.

    Like it or not, in the West there simply is not another form of government on the national scale that supports the interests of a majority Christian people while still providing a reasonable degree of safety and security for historic minority populations.

    Read-up on the last of the Hapsburg emperors — Karl — a true saint, and now canonically recognized as such at the local level, and how a modern Christian state could exist and even thrive for centuries without disintegrating into multi-ethnic anarchy.

  62. bubba May 29, 2012 @ 1:57 pm

    For a bit of levity …..combined with great satire on the War Mongering US….I recommend this.

    Monty Python “Mr. Neutron” Sketch

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2gM_Cyt4CA

  63. Karen Toffan May 29, 2012 @ 2:12 pm

    The winner of the 2005 National Jewish Award was The Jewish Century by Yuri Slezkine and it opens with this…

    “The modern age is the Jewish Age and we are all to varying degrees Jewish”.

    O.K. and what defines this age? Isolation and unhappiness to the extent that anti-depressants are a mainstay, 160 million dead in warfare in the 20th century, inhumanity, rape of our natural resources, bad food, bad water, bad vibes.

    I could continue but you get the picture. Heaven help us.

  64. Has C. May 29, 2012 @ 3:24 pm

    Last things first:

    @ Greg Groebner

    Yes and no. Look at Switzerland. They have been doing quite well for centuries without a monarch. The Icelanders have also a long tradition of a sort of people-rule. On the other side, there has scarcely existed a more rotten and compromised institution than the British Monarchy.

    But, generally, one can hardly disagree with +BN.
    ——————————————————————–

    @Sandra

    You mentioned and linked to Jim Marrs, the propagator of the idea of Nazi takeover of America and of flying saucers. The man is, for my money, a talented gatekeeper, he is also good pals with Alex Jones. I prefer Texe Marrs.

    Speaking of gatekeepers. There has recently been a heated discussion here about Mark Weber there at IHR. In a recent Spingola show on May 16th (1st hour) yet one prominent revisionist, Friedrich Paul Berg (like many others before him) called for Weber’s resignation from IHR due to his sell-out of Holocaust revisionism.

    We have been talking about Suvorov before. Despite having had access to secret documents as a former GRU officer, he used exclusively open source memoirs of Soviet generals and other books to prove his thesis.

    An extremely talented wordsmith, Suvorov. One blemish is his utter disdain for Adolf Hitler. With great relish he describes the Führer as a raving lunatic. But who is perfect? Interestingly, the only access to Suvorov I had (via email) was through an Israeli man Misha Shauli.

    Yes, Matt Johnson says many interesting things about old Russia. One could add the desperate attempts of the Russian government to induce Jews into farming (this from Solzhenitsyn’s ”200 years together”).

    They have repeatedly been given land with machinery and animals. Whole new villages built for them! The Jews settled there never moved a little finger other than sell or eat the animals and rent the land to Russian peasants for money. No kibutz spirit there…

    By the way - the term peasant is a standard word used in translation of the Russian word krestyanin (крестьянин) signifying the class of the person.
    ________________________________________________________________________

    @Kath Juliane

    A great overview of power politics in and around the young USA, and the noble and wise foreign policy of Russia. Thank you for that. I must admit my ignorance of this aspect of newer history .

    I have never expressed any hatred towards Lincoln, which you duely, but mistakenly, noted! If I had or have any bad feelings about the man it may be because I parrotted the American libertarians. DiLorenzo’s books about Lincoln are very convincing but you have provided a broader, international perspective.
    ———————————————————————–

    Quite another subject:

    On May 25th Spingola had an interview with Karl Radl, a researcher of the Protocols. He comes to the conclusion that the document has probably been seized during the Kishnev ”pogrom” in 1903 and due to these circumstances it was difficult for the new owners to give it broad publicity.

    A very good show. Radl has just (an hour ago!) posted the first part of his new article about the subject at:

    http://tinyurl.com/protocols123 ( his website: www.semiticcontroversies.com )

  65. bubba May 29, 2012 @ 3:44 pm

    Marina May 29, 2012 @ 6:04 am

    Yes, I agree. You cannot defeat the Jews head on.

    However, God gave Goyim brains and a soul–use these spiritual WMDs.

    We have to keep in mind that the survivors of WWI and WWII will no longer be with us. they are either witnesses or have been lied to and need closure. As I posted a while aback, my parents escaped Europe after WWII …they lived it…but I know far more about it than they do.

    I am musing about holding up a sign saying ” WISH TO INTERVIEW DRESDEN HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS.”

    99.9% of Jewry would not have a clue, and would think I am Jewish or Zio Jewish.

    However, I have baited the hook, Trap is sprung….and Jewry couldn’t touch me. People get curious and then go down the pre-baited “rabbit holes.”

    I am sure “some” of the Faux Chosen were killed in Dresden…but it is a certifiable fact thousands of Goyim were murdered in the most gruesome way possible.

    In other words, not head on, but a parallel track and no Jew can touch you.

  66. Bobby May 29, 2012 @ 3:51 pm

    Jimmy, of course these nations knew what was going on in Soviet Russia.

    That is why the so-called “great” news people and investigative reporters of that time, Edward R. Murrow, William Shirer, and the rest, were such a farce in the light of what we know today.

    While focusing like a laser beam on the German government that took control in 1933, and all of its pathologies, they were quite aware of how many millions of people the Bolsheviks had murdered many years before the National Socialist seizure of power in Germany.

    Even the various European secret services knew what the Bolsheviks did. That is why so many countries in Europe at the time, didn’t object to the National Socialists at all. But returning to the “news agencies,” it certainly does seem like these American reporters and journalists were agenda driven in how they “reported.”

  67. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 3:52 pm

    Not sure if someone here or elsewhere mentioned this book, but it definitely looks like a worthwhile read (presents a viewpoint on WW2 that is suppressed)

    Onward Christian Soldiers: An American Journalist’s Dissident Look at World War II
    http://www.amazon.com/Onward-Christian-Soldiers-Journalists-Dissident/dp/0939482622

    Summary-A seasoned American observer of the European scene provides an informed, outspoken view of World War II and its origins that contrasts sharply with the familiar, official accounts.

    For 22 years Donald Day (1895-1966) was the only American journalist stationed in Europe north of Berlin.

    From Poland, Finland, Latvia, Sweden and elsewhere in northern and central Europe, he covered events as correspondent for the Chicago Tribune. His dispatches were read by millions of readers of dozens of American newspapers.

    He was also an authority on the Soviet Union. But unlike many of those who reported on Soviet affairs, he was undeceived about the true character of the Stalin regime.

    Convinced that Third Reich Germany was Europe’s only bulwark against Soviet tyranny, Day resolved actively to enlist in what he regarded as the West’s crucial struggle for survival.

    In the summer of 1944, at a time when the tide of war had already shifted decisively to the Allies, he moved to Berlin to work for German radio. From September 1944 until April 1945, he broadcast from the beleagured capital city, speaking out against President Roosevelt and America’s military-political alliance with Stalinist Russia, and the ruthless Allied war against Germany and Christian Europe.

    In this valuable memoir, Day reveals the character and thinking of an American who decided to enlist with Axis Europe. With a preface by Walter Trohan, and a foreword by Mark Weber

    Review-The Chicago Tribune’s northern Europe correspondent from 1920-40, Day used his base in Riga, Latvia to report unflinchingly on the realities of Soviet tyranny and Red subversion in the Baltic.

    Banned from entering the USSR, fired from the Tribune at the instance of the U.S. State Department, Day threw in his lot with the brave Finns and their German allies during their anti-Bolshevist crusade.

    Onward Christian Soldiers bristles with Day’s insights and reminiscences of northern Europe — Scandinavia, Germany, Poland, Danzig, Lithuania, and his beloved Latvia, Estonia, and Finland in the years between the wars.

    With an introduction by legendary Tribune correspondent Walter Trohan, Onward Christian Soldiers pulls no punches on the Jewish role in Communism and on Britain and America’s hypocrisy in posing as defenders of Christian civilization.

    Review-I strongly recommend this book as an antidote to the conventional popular histories of WWII.

    Many will find it shocking at first, but should finish it before passing judgement. One of the three clichés about war is that history is written by the victors, and this is probably more true of the Second World War than any other.

    The book paints a picture of civilisation, as Day sees it, under threat from Bolshevism, which is, in its founders and intellectual proponents, mainly a Jewish affair. We who grew up in the post-war period have been taught to believe that the Germans were antisemitic with little explanation of their motives other than some inherent fault.

    Onward Christian Soldiers suggests that there was a lengthy and involved conflict between German nationalism, the desire to unite German speakers and celebrate what they had in common, and Communism or Bolshevism which saw similarities between people because of their shared ancestry as a hindrance to uniting all peoples of the world under one ideology.

    There’s also a third review that calls this guy an anti-semite–I guess we all know what that’s about.

  68. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 5:20 pm

    Has C-

    I totally agree with you on Jim Marrs (yes, generally a shill, just like AJ) - but I at least give him credit for addressing the Suvorov information (I mainly posted it because it was a quick read and people might be familiar with his name. I kind of thought it said something that even Marrs was willing to acknowledge the Surorov info).

    And I’m very aware of the information about Mark Weber. I’ve heard all about him from Mike Piper and how he got control of IHR. I’ve also heard from Spingola about how once he got control of IHR lots of books stopped getting published. But I still link to his audios because I find them informative, well-documented and a quick listen.

    I’m new to historical revisionism and don’t have time to read millions of books on my own, so I sometimes rely on audios (like those of Mark Weber) that summarize the writings of others–and I’m assuming that others might be in a similar position (in terms of time limitations).

    I always try to fact check and compare, and I have found a lot of consistency with his info and those other others.

  69. Sandra May 29, 2012 @ 6:11 pm

    Forgot to add:

    In the Matt Johnson audio on pre-revolutionary Russia, he made a point of saying that the Czar did better by the peasants/farmers than our democratic/republican system which has obviously sold out to ConAgra, Archer Daniels Midland, etc.

    And Johnson knows what he’s talking about because he was very close to the farming community when he got his Ph.D. in history at the University of Nebraska.

  70. Seraphim May 29, 2012 @ 6:18 pm

    @Sandra,

    Since you have quoted Heine, it must be reminded that he was quoted on the wall of the Ipatiev House where the Imperial family was slaughtered.

    It goes like this:

    “Belsazar ward in selbiger Nacht
    Von seinen Knechten umgebracht.”

    It was the bold declaration of who did it and boasting about it.

  71. Has C. May 29, 2012 @ 7:31 pm

    DEAR SANDRA,

    How odd. The book you mentioned is available at the US and UK Amazon but not the German. Otherwise, most books may be bought from the same sellers through both.

    In case you don’t know them, you might want to take a look at the (admittedly, controversial) books of a once famous correspondent of the London Times, anti-Judaic, Douglas Reed about Europe just before and during WW2. Available here:

    http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Douglas_Reed_Books_pdf/Other_books_by_Douglas_Reed.html

    Not to forget the famous “Controversy of Zion” of the same author:
    http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

    A quote from the foreword to “From Smoke to Smother” (1948):

    *”Hitler I met, and watched, on a hundred occasions. He was shadowy, and as distinct from the millions he ruled as if he were of another species. I think this separateness came from the secret he carried, the secret which only an odd German in a million ever learned, then recoiling from or trying to kill the monster.

    He played a part, and the mob never knew that; it saw in him the heroic image of itself and was infatuated.

    I felt the need to laugh when I talked with him; or rather, when I listened to his rasping rodomontade, while the uneasy, worshipping Hess sat beside us.

    “In Hyde Park, I thought, the balloon of this verbosity would quickly be pricked by some sharp Cockney interjection. Today, I am less sure about an English crowd, and know I was wrong about him.”
    ————————————
    *The quote above does not reflect the opinions of this commentator.

  72. Caveman2012 May 29, 2012 @ 8:24 pm

    Dear Has C.,

    The Protocols were discovered demonstrably BEFORE the Kishnev ”pogrom” in 1903. Radl’s hypothesis must be wrong.

    The first documented edition of the Protocols is that of Georgij Butmi, which appeared in S. Petersburg already in 1901 (in Russian). It has been documented by several later editions, such as by Jouin in 1922. I have copies of part of the Butmi edition.

    The second documented edition appeared in 1903 in the journal “Snamja,” and the editor was Pavel Kruschevan.

    Only in 1905 did Sergei Nilus published his first edition of the Protocols.

  73. zane_al May 30, 2012 @ 1:49 am

    Thanks MARINA for setting the record straight about Russia and Putin. I now have a clearer picture.

    But but in the present biblical event of the Last Days, Russia and Putin will be in the side shows. The main players would be Anti-christ Israel, Gogs and Magogs (Europe and USA) - on the evil side.

    On the good side would be Christ (2nd Coming), the Mahdi (Ahmedinejad) and their army (mostly shias). All are already present on this earth. But victory for the good will take time.

    The Second Coming is here and now. Bad news is that Christ will not be appearing in Person….imagine the chaos if he is to appear in Ouadouguogou or remote Amazon…LOL

    His spirit has already descended on this earth and it is in the hearts of people like BN, Roy Tov, Norman Finkelstein and others….

    These people will fight and eventually slay the Anti-christ with their pen.

    The physical war will be fought by Ahmedinejad and his army.

    It will come to pass soon.

  74. Has C. May 30, 2012 @ 2:54 am

    Dear CAVEMAN2012

    Re: Protocols

    Up till now I thought there was only one version but the Radl said that there are more and they differ significantly. I am trying to locate the older ones (the only one translated to western languages seems to be Nilus’). Maybe you have links to the older versions?

    The “Krushevan version” was not divided into numbered protocols and, in contrast to the Nilus’, there are references to Old Testament but none to Freemasonry. Radl says it contains “ukrainisms” which suggests that an Ukrainian person has put it down.

    Searching for it I have found out that there is a whole Russian-language “protocology” (not proctology) out there with a large number of publications and treatises.

  75. Sandra May 30, 2012 @ 7:09 am

    Has C-

    Thanks for the book recommendations!

    I read Controversy of Zion years ago. I’ll have to take a look at Douglas Reed’s other books, once I finish with David Hoggan’s The Forced War.

    Also, according to Veronica Clark, the best book on post WWII Germany is Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany.

    It’s definitely avaiable at the US Amazon, but probably not the Germany’s Amazon.

    Here’s a review: http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/01/thomas-goodrichs-hellstorm/

  76. ferragut May 30, 2012 @ 9:56 am

    Spain’s Contribution to the American War for Independence @

    http://xenophongroup.com/mcjoynt/spain01.htm

  77. Has C. May 30, 2012 @ 10:51 am

    Dear Sandra,

    I have heard of this book “Hellstorm.” In the meantime I have a beautifully illustrated book “Bombenkrieg gegen Deutschland” or something similar which I bought in Munich.

    So, the theme is not forbidden to mention in Germany.

  78. bubba May 30, 2012 @ 1:42 pm

    Re the Protocols of Elders of Zion..

    I wouldn’t focus too much on the details and debates of origin, though I did also listen to the Spingola interview with Radl on the topic.

    I am more predisposed to accept them along the lines Henry Ford did, where he wasn’t pinned down, but made the quote below .

    QUOTE:
    IN an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the “Protocols of Zion” tersely and convincingly. He said: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”

    Consider the Protocols a eerily accurate playbook/manual, that is still consistent in its modern unfolding….and what group/s are using this same playbook/ manual for their self -serving agenda ?

  79. Cynthia Lauren Thorpe May 30, 2012 @ 4:44 pm

    Thank You, our Brother.

    The blessing? GOD is faithful - and I had FAITH that He’d not prove me a liar.

    You will find my (rather, His & my) donation to His Ministry on this ‘the very last day of May 31st’ out here in the Coastal Outback.

    On my knees waiting for The Messiah and lifting all up to His Throne…

    Cynthia Lauren

  80. John June 2, 2012 @ 3:04 am

    Although your videos are usually short Nate, your articles do spread with remarks like wild-fire. I have a few views I’d like to discuss here.

    The first remark I’d like to point to would be Marina’s to Jake about Russian politics. Yes Sister, Russian politicians certainly have been watched and for a long time now.

    But, I’m fairly certain Russians do have counter-surveillance operations which identify and eliminate threats to Russian nationalism, whether these threats are Arab in nature or not (of course, I’m sure there has been Arab involvement in supporting Chechen rebels - however the Russian reaction to early Chechen violence had been quite excessive - like destroying Grozny in the 1990s I believe).

    I’m also fairly certain a number of Jews continue covert operations in an attempt to destroy Russia’s identity.

    Putin’s decision to strengthen the Church by building more and restoring extant ones is a very bold and exemplary decision. I find Putin to be a very determined person who drives a very hard bargain, as opposed to a reckless and overbearing Boris Yeltsin.

  81. John June 2, 2012 @ 3:17 am

    Wolf911,

    My second response would be to your initial view. In terms of classifying Muslims, the best you can do is to recognize where Islam originated. I believe the birth-place of Islam had been Mecca.

    Because Arabs are very community and group oriented, I’m fairly certain a majority of Muslims will be that way as well. My point is that I’m fairly sure I know what you meant to express with your video.

    I too share your view that Islam in Moscow is a threat, not because of what Muslims believe, but because of how it is practiced. Until today, “real” Muslims go to mosques to pray five times a day. Not only is that very excessive, it is also very group-oriented.

    Regardless of the purpose, a very large group of any kind in one area will always be a threat. I’m pretty sure those police officers or security forces have itchy trigger fingers. I can’t imagine why they might be that way. May the Lord keep them from firing upon such a large crowd of people.

  82. John June 2, 2012 @ 3:40 am

    My third remark will be to Marina’s view about internal Russian ethnicity and the path to citizenship.

    To be frank, I’m very tired of reading the words “special appeal” from Brother Nate when he sends e-mails out. And second, what “special” tests are you referring to Marina when someone wants to undergo the path to Russian citizenship?

    Of course, naturally, if somebody is not Russian and never has been Russian, the path to citizenship will be different (namely if they aren’t racially even Caucasian in the first place). So, are you labeling those foreigners dummies? What does special mean? I’m not entirely sure what you had been trying to get at.

    In my view, if Pakistanis are responsible for detonating explosives in Jerusalem not too long ago, then any foreign influence to Russia’s sovereignty will be perceived as a threat to the Russian nation. Muslims should be very careful about how they practice their religion because it is a Christian nation after all, and I’m sure that’s what you mean to say Marina.

    At the same time, Jews should recognize the strength of the Church in Russia and should do their utmost to respect that. Jewish subversion will not bring Russia down again, and neither will the Islamic threat in terms of having such gigantic strength in numbers.

  83. Marina June 2, 2012 @ 7:10 am

    John,

    You are right, Islam was born in Mecca. More than that, the original Islam was a kind of an imitation of Judaism.

    Originally Islam was not meant to be a universal religion. It was meant to be an Arab religion. Non-Arab converts to Islam were accepted but they were still discriminated against and treated as a worse category of Muslims. For this reason there were countless rebellions against the Arabs, especially in Persia and Central Asia.

    Moreover, during the first two centuries of the Caliphate the interpretation of the Koran was very fluid, the Shariah did not yet exist. There were no Hadiths yet. More than that, there existed several different versions of the Koran which is often mentioned in Muslim history.

    Of course, Islam is different from Christianity, its origins are not universalist, it tends to be more agressive. Some authors argue that that Islam is responsible for the erosion of the Classical culture (which never really died after the decline of Rome) in Christian Europe.

    Certainly, Islam has not been very conducive to progress and change, though there have been a few exceptions such as Tatars in Russia.

    Already in the 18th century the Tatars realized they needed to reform Islam and they did reform it. The movement was called Jadidism. For this reason Volga Tatars became the most “Europeanized” Muslims of all the Muslims.

    The truth is that the current problem with Muslims is partly (if not mostly) of the West’s making. Several decades ago it was difficult to find women in hidjabs in most Muslim countries.

    To some extent the Muslim revival may have been inspired by the Revolution in Iran, but only to some extent. Shiite Islam could not rally appeal much to the majority of Muslims who happen to be Sunnis.

    Around the time of the Islamic Revolution in Iran the USA began to support the Mujahaddin in Afghanistan against the secular government there.

    Not only that, around the same time troubles started in India, in Kashmir. All kinds of Mujahhadin began to appear in Kashmir killing both Hindus and Muslims who refused to adopt the Wahhabi version of Islam. Money was coming from Saudi Arabia but military support often from the USA.

    The ideologues of the NWO ganged themselves up with one of the worst Muslim countries, the most backward, the most intolerant but also the wealthiest - Saudi Arabia, the cradle of Wahhabism. They began to use Saudi-financed fanatical mercenaries to pursue their politics. And they have been doing it quite effectively. First in Afghanistan, then Yugoslavia, Chechnya, Irak and now we have Syria.

    In the future they probably plan to use these crazy Wahhabi jihadists against Shiite Iranians.

    Yes, the first Chechen war was excessive but under the misgovernment of Yeltsin you could not expect anything good. Everything was excessive. The losses of both civilians and soldiers were indeed shocking. The second Chechen war was carried out in a more professional manner.

    I did not talk about “tests” in relation to citizenship but I talked about “tests” in relation to getting a visa to be able to work in Russia, of course, temporarily. If you want to work in Russia you should be able to communicate in Russian. Also, you should know Russian culture and Russian ways.

    There were a few cases of some Central Asians slaughtering a lamb on a balcony in Moscow. Moscow is not some kyshlak in Uzbekistan where you can slaugheter animals right in front of anyone. This behaviour did not shock only Christian Russians but also Russian Muslims living in Moscow.

    It was decided, therefore, that in the future any Central Asian who wants to come to Russia must not only demonstrate an ability to use the Russian language but must pass a test in Russian culture and traditions. And it has to be done in his country - before coming.

  84. Has C. June 2, 2012 @ 12:31 pm

    ”I agree with you here. I am ethnically Polish. If they ignore the Holocaust they are ignoring 2-2.5 million Polish deaths.”

    ”When one applies such a disrespectful and arrogant attitude in regard to the Polish issues”

    ”Expulsion of German and Eastern European deaths and Holodomar. Well guess what I know and respect these tragic events”
    ————————————————————-

    Dear Deer Mountain and Paul87,

    I recommend you the following exercise because it works for me: just before I begin to read or write an entry on a subject which is likely to make my blood boil, I say a little prayer.

    It may be easy to write ”Jews are suckers” anonymously, enjoying the privacy of your room and own PC with a good internet connection, meaning you have a job and your (and mine) belly is full.

    But somehow, when the subject of the discussion begins to dismantle or even change just a little one’s national self-perception/Selbstbild/autopercepcję/самоощущение, the blood is somehow boiling.

    Imagine a typical, nice Jew, like an acquaintance of mine, who doesn’t even know the official story of Treblinka but who KNOWS that the 6 million died and he won’t even begin to dream of considering to watch the wonderfully logical ”One third of the Holocaust” movie of Denierbud ( http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/ ).

    His blood is boiling at the mere thought that somebody questions the Holocaust. He’ll NEVER see this movie, so full of undeniable truth, just one click away! Not to speak of Denierbud’s even better, almost comical, recent “Auschwitz. Why The Gas Chambers Are A Myth” ( http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/ ).

    By the same token, your blood is boiling at the mere thought that Poland may be perceived as anything else than a chivalrous but badly victimized Central European Power.

    Even a well documented assertion that in Poland ”between 1919-1939 up to 60,000 German civilians have been murdered and millions had to flee their homes” ( http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Chronologie_antideutscher_Gewalt_von_Polen ) is extremely uncomfortable.

    Not to speak of the uncounted German victims who fled or died after the War to make place for the Poles fleeing their homes the former eastern Poland.

    No less uncomfortable for a nationally conscious German and Russian is the idea that his/hers ancestors or relatives were accessory to or murdered or persecuted Poles nad other nationalities.

    Nobody really knows how many Poles died during WW2. A statistical analysis is no less difficult than that of Jewish deaths of the time. Most archives were destroyed or stolen, many people emigrated.

    The definition itself of a Pole in a multinational state of 20 years duration is difficult. How many Poles died by German, Jewish or Russian hand is hard to assess indeed.

    In all these big historical ”events” of XX century case can be made that the real instigators were conspiring Jewish backers. But in most or all cases they had local, stupid, bribed or criminally minded elites and executioners.

    I guess it is true that some Germans, their nation crucified twice and tormented to this very day, tend to idolize the NS regime and negate the brutality of the occupation of (former) Poland together with the ”denial of Holocaust.” My blood is boiling and curdling when crimes like “Inglorious Basteerds” are being committed.

    I like to consider things on a personal level. It enlivens history.

    You know why I was lucky to be born at all? Speaking of just the period 1919-45:

    - Because my paternal family lived in a good, solid, Christian Polish-German village near Poznan where nobody would tolerate any anti-German excesses;

    - Because my maternal grandfather got stuck underway to his unit and thus avoided Katyn and later had a good sense (and money) to move with his wife and many chidren out of the apartment in Warsaw at Marszalkowska street to a summer house in July 1944 (a ”Yale” key alone is what is left from the apartment in my possession btw);

    - Because my father was too young to get drafted into Wehrmacht in 1945,

    - Because an American fighter pilot was a bad marksman and missed my father and his bicycle near Munich in 1945.

    Back to the large picture. One Elzbieta Janicka wrote a book about the ”struggle of Polish against the Jewish martyrdom” in Warsaw. Being an ethnic Pole, she fashions herself a ”virtual Jew” and castigates the “rapaciously egoistical” Polish victimhood. I have met her her – a highly unstable and misanthropic personality.
    (@ tygodnik.onet.pl/33,0,74448,twierdza_narcyzow,artykul.html ).

    MARINA has written above that: ”It is, by and large, counter-productive to argue over who did what to whom and who is to blame for this or for that while the Talmudists are fleecing everyone. Europeans need, first and foremost, unity. All these complex historical issues can be dealt with later when times are more favourable.”

    I would subscribe with both hands but there is no real unity between Rhine and Volga, or do I need new spectacles?

    Germans have already expiated any possible and impossible crimes, many times over and under duress, hence the subterranean backlash so palpable also here.

    Russians may be very busy fighting the Globalist onslaught but, knowing some, I know that they would have greatly appreciated a friendly Polish neighbour.

    I think it is unavoidable that also the Poles take their part of historical responsibility for crimes of the past and begin to stretch their hands to their neighbours, sincerely and in Christian spirit instead of expecting subterfuge and fearing for their sacred honour.

  85. Justin June 15, 2012 @ 4:40 pm

    This quote (at least to me) says alot of the Jewish destruction of our souls and “isolation” as Br. Nathanael puts it.

    “Today’s popular culture cripples and deforms the soul and hinders it from having a full and normal response to the message of Orthodoxy.”
    -Blessed Seraphim Rose

    Fr. Seraphim did a whole talk on how popular culture deforms the soul. He likened popular culture to that of the Soviet Gulag.

  86. peter hairston October 21, 2014 @ 4:56 pm

    I think I might accept small bit of advertising.

    For example — Dr. Rima who has cure for ebola and is similar to you — honest Jew.

    I think I might accept bit coin ads as it is certainly not controlled by government nor taxed.

    Good work!

Leave a comment

Please copy the string VojGq0 to the field below:


Feed