Main Contents

Trump Drains The Swamp In Final Debate

Brother Nathanael Channel Videos!, BroVids

Trump Drains The Swamp In Final Debate
October 20, 2016

Watch ‘EU-Censor-Free!’ HERE!


For More See: How The Trump-Clinton Debate Was Rigged Click Here

And: US ‘False Flag’ Against Russia Puts Hillary In Click Here

For More See: Is Hillary Clinton The Anti-Christ? Click Here

And: Hillary Clinton Wants Your Guns! Click Here

And: Bad Start With Hillary Click Here

And: Why The Jews Love Hillary Click Here


Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Brother Nathanael @ October 20, 2016


  1. Brother Nathanael October 20, 2016 @ 11:14 pm

    Text –Text– Text

    Trump Drains The Swamp In Final Debate
    By Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Copyright 2016

    The stakes are high.

    If Trump gets in, he’s going to drain the swamp.

    If Hillary gets in, she’ll flood it.

    Obama dug it, filled it, and mucked it up.

    The stench could suffocate for years to come.

    [Clip: ” We are going to make America strong again. And we are going to make America great again, and it has to start now. We cannot take four more years of Barak Obama, and that’s what you get when you get her.”]

    It’s not just four more years of Obama, it’s four more worse years of the stinking swamp Obama built.

    The stakes are high and the contrasts are stark.

    Hillary wants the government to invade…

    [Clip: ” We need comprehensive background checks, need to close the on-line loophole, close the uh, gunshow loopholes.”]

    Trump wants to invade the government.

    [Clip: ” When it comes to Washington DC, it is time to drain the damn swamp. That’s why I’m proposing a package of ethics reforms to make our government honest once again. If I’m elected president, I will push for a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress.”]

    Hillary wants to kill babies…

    [Clip: ” I will defend Planned Parenthood. I will defend Roe v Wade.”]

    Trump wants to save babies.

    [Clip: ” If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby. Now you can say that that’s ok, and Hillary can say that that’s ok, but it’s not ok with me.”]

    Hillary wants war with Russia…

    [Clip: ” You’ve seen reports. Russia’s hacked in to a lot of things. China’s hacked into a lot of things. Russia even hacked into the Democratic National Committee. Maybe even some state election systems. So we’ve gotta step up our game. Make sure we are well defended, and able to take the fight to those who go after us. As president, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses. “]

    Trump wants peace with Russia.

    [Clip: ” I don’t know Putin. He said nice things about me. If we got along well, that would be good. If Russia and the United States got along well and went after ISIS, that would be good.”]

    And the biggest farce of them all is Hillary’s “pivot to Putin.”

    [Clip: ” In a speech you gave to a Brazilian bank for which you were paid $225,000, we’ve learned from the Wikileaks that you said this, and I quote: My dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders. So–”

    “Thank you.”

    ” So, that’s the question — please quiet everybody — is that your dream, open borders.”

    “You are, um, very clearly quoting from Wikileaks. And what’s really important about Wikileaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions. Then they have given that information to Wikileaks for the purpose of putting it on the internet. This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government, clearly from Putin himself.”

    “That was a great pivot off the fact that she wants open borders. Ok? How did we get onto Putin?”]

    To divert Clinton’s crimes to a fabricated tension between America and Russia, that’s how.

    It’s called taking your eye off the ball.

    Trump calls it “nuclear warming.”

    [Clip: “Don’t forget, Obama said that global warming is our biggest threat. I happen to think it’s nuclear warming. Our biggest threat is nuclear. And it’s not global warming, it’s nuclear warming. And I’ll tell you what, we’re going to work very hard on that situation, because that situation is getting more and more and more out of control. And Hillary talks tough about Russia.”]

    And she’s got a gang of neocon Jews that she’s “warming” the nuclear pot for:

    Chertoff, Kagan, Kristol, Wainstein, to name a few.

    That’s one sure sign Clinton’s a sorry choice. For what’s good for the Jews is bad for everyone else.

    If we’re really going to drain the swamp then the neocons have to go.

    They led us into failed wars abroad and body bags sent back home.

    Drain the swamp. Don’t flood it with the fleas that fouled it in the first place.

  2. Brother Nathanael October 20, 2016 @ 11:15 pm

    Watch This BRAND NEW Video Worldwide & In All EU Countries CENSOR FREE:

    “Trump Drains The Swamp In Final Debate” @

    This is my STATE-OF-THE-ART Video Platform AND I OWN It! It Bypasses ALL Jew-Censorship.

    ALL Jew-Ruled EU Countries Can NOW View ALL My Vids Without JEW-CENSORSHIP! @

  3. Brother Nathanael October 20, 2016 @ 11:17 pm


    Here’s my UPDATED Schedule of my Street Evangelism:

    (ALL Sponsored Trips!)

    Washington DC – October 11-18/HUGE Success!

    Boston – October 27-31

    San Francisco – November 3-8

    Washington DC – November 15-18

    + Please Consider Sponsoring Me To Come To YOUR City! +

    Please Help Me Financially To Continue my Street Evangelism, Videos, and Articles.

    To Donate Via PayPal CLICK:

    To Donate Via Click & Pledge CLICK:

    By Mail:

    The Brother Nathanael Foundation; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    May Christ Bless Us All!

    +Brother Nathanael @

  4. Brother Nathanael October 20, 2016 @ 11:17 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family,

    If you LIKE my Videos and Articles please help!

    To Donate Your Tax Deductible Contribution Via PayPal CLICK:

    Or Donate Your Tax Deductible Contribution Via Click & Pledge @

    By Mail: The Brother Nathanael Foundation; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    Personal Needs: (rent, expenses, food, necessities, etc)

    Brother Nathanael; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856.

    +Brother Nathanael @

    PS – ALL cash donations by mail come in safely.

    PPS All mail is forwarded from my prior mailing address in Frisco CO…but please send donations to my new address above.

  5. Leave a comment October 21, 2016 @ 12:06 am

    Hillary and Bill Clinton are liars who love power and war.

    They are pure evil with no shame or remorse. They love it so much that they marry their only daughter with the criminal Mezvinsky family.

    The father of the son-in-law Edward Mezvinsky of the Clinton’s is a convicted crook who tried to blame his fraud because of mental illness.

    If Trump can make them go to jail and pay it would be worth your vote!!

  6. B October 21, 2016 @ 2:56 am

    What is the possibility that everything that we observe in this present US presidential contest is actually a Hollywood type of well thought out and choreographed soap opera ( big lie )?

    If it is all choreographed, then what is the real problem, and also then what is the real solution?

    The problem is that it then appears that God and the characteristics of God are not present within these big lies, and we can not then release ourselves from this problem matter until we are convinced that God’s Good is present in this matter.

    So, the solution is to establish in our mind that God and God’s character is present in this matter. Then we are able to turn loose of the problem and release it to God, and not worry so much about it as we become convinced that God is present.

    Repeating the problem to ourselves over and over in our mind only increases the problem, and thus makes the problem worse.

    The solution then is to repeat faith to ourselves of how it is that God and God’s character is actually very present in this matter.

    Here are a few example solution statements to repeat: God is always perfectly honest, and never lies. God knows what information we need, and God supplies everything that we need.

    The great problem is now solved, and we can turn the problem over to God for God’s perfection to work.

  7. Zionien October 21, 2016 @ 3:15 am


    Another masterpiece +BN!

  8. Heine Goldprick October 21, 2016 @ 3:25 am

    Luciferian Crypto Trump & His Masonic Lackeys
    Will Not Be Sending Any YouKnowWhos To The Pokey
    All Those Intel Homo Schlomos Need To Be Thrown
    From The Freedom Train That Goes Clickety-Clackety
    With The Gazillionares Signin’ The Goyim Drones
    With The 666 Okey-Dokey Schmikety Schmakety

  9. paschn October 21, 2016 @ 5:45 am

    If the man is for real, best watch over him jealously, as a loving parents would their child.

    The Synagogue has, and will again, kill any “Goy” leader daring to expose them for the animals they are, or interfere with their plans for a Satanic world to symbolically rub in the face of our Creator and His Son during the Great Tribulation.

    Sewer Nation is rife with evil/treachery. Look how easily Literal “Israel” has misled so many and clouded the line between themselves and spiritual “Israel”.

    One look at the millions of misled evangelicals’ (Hagee-ites et al), maniacal groveling before “The Synagogue” shows that.

    There’s even talk that the succubus Killary has blood-of-the-synagogue flowing in her lineage, which explains volumes of her evil – and apparently the stench — of Satan?

  10. The English Man October 21, 2016 @ 6:21 am

    @All the Family

    Northern Truth Seeker 18th October.

    Excellent video by `Snordster`. Probably as relevant to Great Britain as anywhere.

  11. Shell Shocked October 21, 2016 @ 7:18 am

    So Edward Mezvinsky (First Iowa Congressional District) goes to prison, and his wife under her maiden name but still married, Marjorie Margolies, runs for Congress in a Pennsylvania district, and wins.

    I’m not up on all the details, but her political career crashed and burned when she campaigned on not raising taxes in a predominately Republican district. President Bill Clinton’s economic plan had some tax increases embedded in it and was stalled with a tie.

    Clinton called Margolies and asked her to change her vote for it, and she responded that only if it broke a tie. She did switch her vote, the Republicans were angry and waved handkerchiefs at her, and she was voted out the next election.

    There seems to be a political pattern proliferating more in recent times with these power couples (and families).

  12. Joe Cortina October 21, 2016 @ 9:07 am

    I liked your analysis and comparison.

    It was simple accurate and comprehensive enough to be understood even by by our humanoid populace of morons imbeciles and idiots who cannot wait to trash what is left of Merka – ALL at the bequest of the Jews and ALL because of our CRIMINAL IGNORANCE.

    This election will reveal many things. The depth of evil of the Godless shallow hypocrite AmeriKan people – and on a more frightening level – the fate of civilized mankind and civilization as we know it.



  13. Wallace Hamburger October 21, 2016 @ 10:38 am

    Therein lies a tiny little elephant,
    two points due East;
    as far as the Sun rises;
    there you will find the monsters of your dreams
    in Mideon.

  14. Bruce October 21, 2016 @ 11:46 am

    @Joe Cortina

    I want to share this video with you. Like yourself I am a veteran of the American armed forces; having served two years in the Marines and another 6 years in the Navy back in the seventies.

    As you look at the second half of this video, I can honestly say that at the age of 61, I could still run circles around these “fat bodies” as my senior DI in Marine Corp used to say.

    How these people even made it past military boot camp is a shame.

    Also our military has become the modern day Sodom and Gormorah. Sadly, and I say this for the sake of our once proud Republic; our military has become nothing more than a breeding ground for every libtard, politically correct program.

    I owe no apologies for posting this video. If someone does not like it, then they can pick up ther toys and go home.

    God bless

    ( )

  15. BN For President 2016 October 21, 2016 @ 12:07 pm

    Not bad idea.

  16. The Hillary and Donald Puppet Show October 21, 2016 @ 1:29 pm

    Wish it was all good but +BN provided conclusive evidence over and over that Donald is a JWO puppet. It’s not just Hillary only who is a JWO puppet –

    Trump’s Deck Of Jewish Cards

    Trump Takes The Kosher Seal

    When Trump Makes A Deal – at 3:10 of video

    Trump’s Got Plans For America – at 4:32

    Believing what politicians promise when they run for office is like Eve believing Satan when she swallowed the fruit of death. What Hillary and Donald are telling us has little if any bearing on what they will actually do.

    +BN documented the Kushner family and various other rich Jews who have Donald’s puppet strings; Donald’s daughter converting to Judaism to marry Jared Kushner, and +BN named some of the big money Jews financing Donald. See +BN’s articles linked above.

    The JWO is obsessed with keeping us in the dark about how they are using Donald to get Hillary elected. Donald is talking up the election being rigged against him to counter stories that Donald is secretly helping Hillary get elected.

    It’s no accident that Donald, the republican candidate who polled weakest against Hillary, became the republican nominee. The JWO banksters rigged it for Hillary to run against the candidate she had the best chance of beating.

    Donald has been a Democrat all his life. Donald donated lots of money to Hillary when she ran for senator of Jew York and also when Hillary ran for president in 2012.

    +BN published lots of hard facts on this site about Donald and his Jewish puppet masters which are still hard facts. Our emotions may have swayed back and forth about Donald but what +BN proved about Jewish influence over Donald is still reality.

    This election is an act. It’s rigged all right and Donald is helping Hillary rig it. Donald is claiming Hillary has it rigged so he doesn’t seem to be in on the scam. Even so, I’ll still vote for Tramp because I’m voting an all republican ticket and because the other choice is Hillary Rotten.

    The Republican Party is only about half as corrupt as the Democrat Party. The JWO hopes to discourage Christians from voting in November by using Trump as the face of the Repub Party. But I’ll vote an all Republican ticket in hopes that Republican congressmen will keep Hillary from bringing further destruction.

    As the JWO proved with their assassinations of Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, JFK – one goy opposing the Jews makes little or no difference. JWO puppets like Hillary and Donald make even less difference. As prophesied, only Jesus can save us.

  17. Irene Bonney Faulkes October 21, 2016 @ 4:25 pm

    It is somewhat obvious that the swamp is there partially due to actions of all those who knowingly or unwittingly subscribe to popular End Time views.

    There must be wars and a great one bringing on an Armageddon is the potent mover. Whatever path of mythical delusion is taken, Russia is often seen as the ogre that must unleash her might down there in the Middle East, to fulfill Scripture. Hence there is a widespread feeling that the sooner it happens the better.

    Alas, due to this inconsistency of belief with what Christ said as well as the Spirit of Christ in the prophets proclaimed, this block that would rather a war-like criminalized Hillary than a peace-loving Trump.

    Little comprehension exists to the fact that in this they contribute greatly to the bringing down of their nation and many of its churches. This is an evil that rebounds from the evil myths.

    As Peter said, ‘Judgment begins at the house of God’, one can envision the strong possibility that this will be the outcome of the misconceptions.

    Christians awake to a morn of repentance and reversal of those devil driven beliefs to the truth as it is in Christ Jesus.

    The truth regarding Russia is that she outweighs other nations in her military strength that is very advanced. Far better to have a Trump with the olive branch of peace.

    Peace with a filthy swamp to clear is the better option.

  18. debbie October 21, 2016 @ 7:36 pm

    Presidents are just figureheads. The real powers are the CFR, CIA, etc.

    Trump is a con man. He is still is a NYC liberal, lol.

    Hillary was a spy for the U.S.

  19. Stalwart October 21, 2016 @ 8:54 pm


    “Trump is a con man.”

    You very well might have smacked it right on the bulls-eye regarding Trump. However, I sure hope this turns out wrong.

    Time will tell!

  20. JC Supporter October 21, 2016 @ 9:30 pm

    In the face of such obvious, brazen corruption, there are still people who support Hillary?

    It really is disheartening, to state the bloody obvious (ala Joe Cortina above).

    Liberals or “normies” have no brains, they just repeat MSM brainwashing points and shout you down when you ask simple questions like I did to one of them: “should Americans allow themselves to be genocided”? His response was a big laugh, as if my question was stupid.

    The powers that be (Jewish) won’t allow Trump in, but they will look bad after (having already) a stolen election event.

    Will this all be a tempest in a teapot, election over, Hillary president, all goes back to normal? We will see.

  21. Terence Colledge TEM October 22, 2016 @ 6:25 am

    @Bruce to Joe Cortina

    Your video on Holy Russian Service Men & Women is more than enough to bring the Aryan outside of Russia to tears.

    Would anyone truly, West of the Urals want to take on Mankinds only hope?

    Today there is nothing Righteous or remotely Holy in the American leadership, where upon they should remember, as with the Titanic they said “God himself couldn’t sink her”~~~~~SO HE DID.

    History tells us when Great Nations fall (Ancient Egypt. Greece, Rome, and many others), recover to former glory they do not.

    History tells us also,there is a first time for everything. Though I fear nothing short of a second revolution is going to work to give back America’s Holy Christian Status.

    P.S. Bruce, would your video not make a fitting Christmas present for your maniac Milley?

  22. Ted Gorsline October 22, 2016 @ 9:21 am

    By far the biggest story of the election has been Project Veritas taping Scott Faval, Bob Creamer and Cesar Vargas (an undocumented immigrant) explain how the Democratic Party has been rigging elections for 50 years; and how convicted felon Creamer has visted the Obama/Clinton White House more than 300 times.

    And yet no story has died quicker in MSM. It looks to me like both Faval and convicted felon and Democratic party insider Creamer – are Jews but I cannot be sure.

    Creamer’s wife has a Jewish last name. One of them has changed his last name at least once, and there are allegations Faval is gay.

    I guess that is why CNN hasn’t covered the story. Got to keep polishing the turds to make them look as good as possible and deflect the conversation into ” Trump won’t accept the results if he loses” – but why should he if the voting is rigged?

  23. KathJuliane October 22, 2016 @ 10:22 am

    McClatchy: Clinton’s WikiLeaks strategy: Doubt, delay, distract

    The emails are full of potential damage for Hillary Clinton. She weighed the political implications of policies. She is close to Wall Street. Her aides gathered information to discredit a woman who’d accused her husband of rape.

    So how has she so far remained largely unscathed by the unprecedented release of hacked emails?

    It’s one part a deliberate strategy of casting doubt on the authenticity and distracting from the content of the emails, one part fatigue by Americans who already have seen tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails and one part a whole lot of luck.

    With Clinton leading in both national polls and battleground-state surveys, the Democrat is in some ways trying to run out the clock on the election.

    The WikiLeaks emails do threaten to reinforce voter doubts about Clinton’s honesty. But her strategy – refuse to confirm the authenticity of the emails, blame Russia for the hack and say little else – has so far successfully defused the impact by avoiding any talk that would keep voters looking at the content of the messages.

    Her undisciplined opponent has taken care of the rest.

    “When you start explaining, you’re in trouble,” said G. Terry Madonna, the director of the Franklin & Marshall College poll in Pennsylvania. “They are handling it the best way they can. It’s about as an effective argument you can make.”

    Clinton demonstrated her approach during this week’s final presidential debate.

    When moderator Chris Wallace asked her about a particular email, for example, she shifted to Russia and Republican opponent Donald Trump’s praise of its leader, Vladimir Putin.

    “What’s really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans,” Clinton said.

    “They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions. Then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the internet.”

    Later the same evening, Clinton ally and interim Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile used a similar approach to brush aside questions about an email suggesting she’d given Clinton a question in advance of a primary debate.

    “I have seen so many doctored emails. I have seen things that come from me at 2 in the morning that I don’t even send. There are several email addresses that I once used. This has not been verified. This is under investigation,” Brazile told Megyn Kelly of Fox News. “Go to Russia,” she added later.

    Clinton’s campaign declined to comment for this story other than to refer to its statement of the day, which is about Russia. (The campaign writes a new WikiLeaks statement each day.)

    The Obama administration has publicly accused Russia of being behind the hacks of Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta’s emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing to the public for two weeks.

    At the same time, Ecuador cut off the internet access of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who took refuge in that nation’s London embassy more than four years ago, saying it did not want to interfere in any other nation’s internal affairs.

    “In any other election this would probably not be enough,” Christopher Budzisz, the director of the Loras College Poll in Dubuque, Iowa, said of the Clinton team’s effort to turn people away from the emails.

    “In an ordinary election year it would require a candidate to spend an extraordinary amount of time.”

    But Clinton also has striven to stay out of the way as the media focused instead on salacious allegations against Trump – aided by his own eagerness to keep people talking about those stories.

    The email releases came just as attention turned to multiple women accusing Trump of sexual assault following the release of a decade-old video in which he bragged about groping women.

    “If the Trump stuff was not occurring, this (the emails) would be one of the biggest stories in presidential history,” said Scott Jennings, a Republican strategist who ran party nominee Mitt Romney’s 2012 Ohio campaign. “It’s like a great movie released the same weekend as ‘Star Wars.’ ”

    Doug Heye, a veteran Republican strategist who doesn’t support either candidate, said Trump should have quickly moved past his own controversies and left the WikiLeaks emails to do their damage. But instead, Trump has kept the sexual misconduct allegations in the news by insulting the women and challenging their stories.

    “Donald Trump has shown himself incapable of staying out of the way,” he said. “He should allow there to be space to let them get the attention they deserve.”

    Trump has spoken about the emails and issued news releases about them. On Friday, the Trump campaign’s “Crooked Hillary question of the day” was based on WikiLeaks: “Why Wouldn’t A Clinton Administration Be As Riven With Conflicts Of Interest As The Clinton Foundation?” But supporters say he has not gone far enough.

    “I wish Trump would have pushed harder on that,” said Jarrett Cathcart, 19, a Trump supporter and student at the University of Central Florida in Orlando. “I don’t know why he didn’t, because he’s been eager to do it before. I feel that was one issue she was quick to get away from.”

    At least one Republican, though, thinks any attention on the emails is a longer term mistake.

    “These leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process, and I will not indulge it,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., told ABC News. “Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us.”

    Many of the Podesta emails are complicated or mundane, not necessarily provocative reading for voters inundated with Clinton-related emails for a year.

    Others describe infighting and name-calling. Some raise questions about potential conflicts of interest between the Clinton Foundation and State Department. One said Bill and Chelsea Clinton’s “office crap” had almost driven a top foundation official to commit suicide. On Thursday, WikiLeaks released a handful of Obama’s emails. And on Twitter it threatened to hurt Hillary Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine, and Brazile.

    And the emails may never have had as much of a chance of breaking through, given how many already have been released from one source or another.

    Even before WikiLeaks, 55,000 pages of emails had been released from Clinton’s time as the nation’s top diplomat. Conservative groups and news organizations are expected to make available more emails of Clinton and her top aides.

    “I think the American people have sensory overload getting these thousands of email dumps every day,” said Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.

    “It’s just become now part of the background noise, the static that doesn’t demand that much attention. It’s just too much.”

  24. Billy Bob Thorton October 22, 2016 @ 10:53 am

    John W. Whitehead, author of A Government of Wolves, is a Judas goat to pacifism: do not listen to John Whitehead, his reasoning is as follows:


    All of these terrible things are happening to us; the United States is turning into a police state, government mission creep is growing (redundant?), etc., so you should civilly and politely protest your “situation.”


    Yeah, like that’s going to do anything against people who rig elections, extort foreign governments, and shoot protesters dead.

    The real answer is obvious, but I can’t say it here and you won’t find it anywhere, because it’s considered incitement, and that’s illegal (under US laws).

  25. KathJuliane October 22, 2016 @ 11:22 am

    Hillary’s War Crime
    Paul Craig Roberts

    Today, October 20, 2016, is the fifth anniversary of the murder of Muammar Gaddafi by forces organized and unleashed by US President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Remember the killer bitch’s performance, with gleeful laughter, on CBS “News”: “We came, we saw, he died”.

    Muammar Gaddafi was the most progressive political leader in the world. Gaddafi used Libya’s oil wealth for the benefit of the Libyan people.

    He lived in a tent, a nice tent, but not in a palace, and he did not have collections of European exotic cars or any of the other paraphernalia associated with the ruling families in Saudi Arabia and the oil emirates that are Washington’s Middle Eastern allies.

    In Libya, education, medical treatment, and electricity were free. Gasoline was practically free, selling for 14 US cents per litre. Women who gave birth were supported with cash grants and couples received cash grants upon marriage. Libya’s state bank provided loans without interest and provided free startup capital to farmers.

    Gaddafi’s independence from Washington is what brought him down. Earlier in life Gaddafi’s goal was to organize Arabs as a bloc that could withstand Western depredations.

    Frustrated, he turned to Pan-Africanism and refused to join the US Africa Command. He wanted to introduce a gold-based African currency that would free Africans from American financial hegemony.

    Gaddafi had Chinese energy companies developing Libya’s energy resources. Washington, already upset with Russian presence in the Mediterranean, was now faced with Chinese presence as well. Washington concluded that Gaddafi was playing ball with the wrong people and that he had to go.

    Washington organized mercenaries, termed them “rebels” as in Syria, and sicced them on Libya. When it became clear that Gaddafi’s forces would prevail, Washington tricked naive and gullible Russian and Chinese governments and secured a UN no-fly zone over Libya to be enforced by NATO.

    The express purpose of the no-fly zone was to prevent Gaddafi from attacking civilian targets, which he was not doing.

    The real reason was to prevent a sovereign state from using its own air space so that the Libyan Air Force could not support the troops on the ground.

    Once the gullible Russians and Chinese failed to veto the Security Council’s action, the US and NATO themselves violated the resolution by using Western air power to attack Gaddafi’s forces, thus throwing the conflict to the CIA-organized mercenaries.

    Gaddai was captured and brutally murdered. Ever since, Libya, formerly a prosperous and successful society, has been in chaos, which is where the Obama regime wanted it.

    All sorts of lies were told about Gaddafi and Libya, just as lies were told about Saddam Hussein and are told today about Syria and Russia.

    A British Parliamentary Report concluded unambigiously that the Western peoples were fed lies by their governments in order to gain acceptance for the destruction of Libya, and that Libya was destroyed because Gaddafi was regarded as an obstacle to Western hegemony.

    Note that none of the presstitutes have asked the killer bitch about her guilt under the Nuremburg laws for this war crime prepared on her watch. Note that the oligarchs who own the killer bitch and their press prostitutes intend to make this war criminal the next president of the United States.

  26. Seek The Truth October 22, 2016 @ 1:29 pm

    Bill and Hillary Clinton are stooges of the globalists and NWO communist Jews that have worked tirelessly for the past 100 years to destroy the gentiles and especially the white Christian populations of the U.S., Europe and Russia.

    They want total destruction of the U.S. so it can be integrated into the North American Union slave block of the one world government ruled by devil worshipping Jews. (U.S., Mexico and Canada).

    In the U.S., Blacks are the main proletarians they use to destroy the White middle class neighborhoods by constantly heroizing and promoting Black criminals and drug dealers in the media while demonizing, disparaging and denying White Christian males as racist.

    To a lesser extent, communists like to use perversions as promoted by the recent dancing slut on national TV known as Miley Cyrus and many other female cretins such as Madonna and Hillery, the whore of Babylon, and her filthy, demented husband and the two Black, homo, communist thugs occupying the Stink House; Barry O’Bummer and his wife.

    Trump is the lesser of 2 evils.

    He’s up to his eyeballs in Jews so much that matzo balls are coming out of his ears, but at least he expresses some need to preserve the U.S. and the Bill of Rights and to help the White Christian middle class from being besieged by all kinds of communist Jew policies.

    And, unlike Hillery and her Rothschild Jews, Trump does not want to take on the Russians and their nuclear weapons.

  27. Shell Shocked October 22, 2016 @ 6:01 pm


    You forgot her laughing at the end of it (didn’t mean that in a snide manner).

    It was an interview with a female CBS reporter in Kabul, Afghanistan.

    Here is a link to a youtube video clip, very short. Actually both were laughing throughout.

  28. KathJuliane October 22, 2016 @ 7:55 pm

    Dear Shell Shocked,

    How can I forget?

    Like some voices can shatter glass, that Clintonesque evil sadistic laugh after Qaddafi’s heinous rape and murder was broadcast around the world ruptured my eardrums, and is now permanently lasered into my brain after I first heard the gleeful shrieking back in 2011.

    Awful. Just awful. Every day I pray, “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God have mercy on me a sinner,” because I really hope I don’t have to spend eternity in hell with that womanoid.


    Sadistic Personality Disorder Criteria

    This disorder is characterized by cruel, aggressive, manipulative, and demeaning behavior directed towards others.

    Abusiveness and violence are common in the sadist’s social relationships, because the sadist lacks concern for people and derives pleasure from harming or humiliating others.

  29. MM October 23, 2016 @ 6:04 am

    @Seek the Truth

    Very good commentary.

    We must never forget that Communism=Judaism=Talmudism. The whole (collection of writings) of the Talmud, penned by unholy rabbis over thousands of years, can be summed up in one word…satanic. Satan breathed, Satan inspired and Satan emboldened.

    When the Son of God, Jesus Christ, walked this earth, he spoke harshly of their myths, fables and endless genealogies which Jewish leaders promoted over the Torah. Jesus’ justifiable outrage against their usury–banks in the temple courts.

    Demon possession rampant among the towns and villages. Read how many New Testament passages deal with Jesus/his disciples casting out demons and evil spirits!!!

    The Talmud IS the heart-beat of rabbinic Judaism and is woven into the Jewish psyche at an early age, beginning in the home and carried along in Jewish culture, school and synagogue. In one word…supremacism.

    The Talmud is cause and culprit for much of the world’s misery. Judaism took the most unholy aspects of rabbinic writings and teachings and refined and wove it into the fabric of their faith.

    The Bible tells us that Satan is the author of chaos and lies, so isn’t it only natural that Satan’s kids would carry out their father’s wishes, knowingly or not?

  30. hugo October 23, 2016 @ 10:12 am

    Apparently Trump rallies are full whereas Hilary are very small. So how can the media say Hilary is going to win?

    Here is a video showing what is going on.

    Just another example of why the M.S.M. needs to lie continuously–obviously Trump is a threat to the special interest groups/rigged system they represent.

  31. Richard Cousineau October 23, 2016 @ 11:21 am

    hello Bro. Nathanael-some months ago I sent you 50 cash and did not get the usual reply.

    Recently I sent a 20 and asked you to send me an email to let me know if you received it. No reply. I wonder if your mail is messed with or …….what?

    Hope you are very well.

    Richard Cousineau

  32. KathJuliane October 23, 2016 @ 11:53 am

    The Risks of Clinton’s Syrian ‘No-Fly Zone’

    Hillary Clinton’s scheme for a “no-fly zone” – if implemented withouth the Syrian government’s approval – would be an act of war and a risk of a nuclear showdown with Russia, says ex-Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

    By Dennis Kucinich

    The most consequential statement by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Wednesday night’s debate was her pronouncement that a no-fly zone over Syria could “save lives and hasten the end of the conflict,” that a no-fly zone would provide “safe zones on the ground” was in “the best interests of the people on the ground in Syria” and would “help us with our fight against ISIS.”

    It would do none of the above. A U.S. attempt to impose a no-fly zone in Syria would, as Secretary Clinton once cautioned a Goldman Sachs audience, “kill a lot of Syrians,” and, according to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Dunford, lead to a war with Russia.

    If the U.S. has not been invited into a country to establish a “no-fly zone” such an action is, in fact, an invasion, an act of war.

    It is abundantly clear from our dark alliance with Saudi Arabia and our conduct in support of jihadists in Syria that our current leaders have learned nothing from Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya as we prepare to plunge head-long into the abyss of a world war.

    Our international relations are built upon lies to promote regime changes, the fantasy of a unipolar world ruled by America, and a blank check for the national security state.

    As others prepare for war, we must prepare for peace. We must answer the mindless call to arms with a thoughtful, soulful call to resist the coming build-up for war.

    A new, resolute peace movement must arise, become visible and challenge those who would make war inevitable.

    We must not wait until the Inauguration to begin to build a new peace movement in America.

    Dennis Kucinich is a former congressman from Ohio and a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 and 2008.

    [This commentary originally appeared at

    Clinton Repackages Her Syrian ‘No-Fly’ Plan

    Exclusive: In a surprise twist, Hillary Clinton dramatically revised her scheme for a “no-fly zone” over Syria, presenting it as a subject for negotiation with Syria and Russia, reports Robert Parry.

    By Robert Parry

    While the major news media focused on Donald Trump’s agnostic response about whether he would respect the results of the Nov. 8 election, Hillary Clinton slipped in a little-noticed but important revision to her call for a “no-fly zone” in Syria, suggesting that it would be negotiated with Russia and Syria.

    “This would not be done just on the first day,” Clinton replied to a question about the military cost and human toll that imposing a no-fly zone would require. “This would take a lot of negotiation. And it would also take making it clear to the Russians and the Syrians that our purpose here was to provide safe zones on the ground.”

    Before Wednesday night, Clinton had left the impression that the U.S. military would unilaterally impose a “no-fly zone” on Syria, a military action that not only would violate international law but would require a major commitment of U.S. forces to destroy Syrian air defenses and to shoot down planes from the Syrian and possibly the Russian air forces.

    President Obama and the U.S. military high command have resisted pressure to implement Clinton’s suggestion because of the potential for killing large numbers of civilians and dragging the United States into a wider war, potentially a clash with nuclear-armed Russia.

    Debate moderator Chris Wallace noted, “General Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says you impose a no-fly zone, chances are you’re going to get into a war – his words — with Syria and Russia.

    “So the question I have is, if you impose a no-fly zone — first of all, how do you respond to their concerns?

    “Secondly, if you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down?”

    Breaking from her usual belligerent tone, Clinton repackaged her idea as something quite different, a diplomatic initiative to persuade the Syrian and Russian governments that they should allow the creation of a “safe zone” so Syrians fleeing the fighting could have a place to live inside Syria.

    Clinton said: “We’ve had millions of people leave Syria and those millions of people inside Syria who have been dislocated.

    “So I think we could strike a deal and make it very clear to the Russians and the Syrians that this was something that we believe was in the best interests of the people on the ground in Syria, it would help us with our fight against ISIS.”

    Whether the Syrian leadership and the Russian government would accept such a plan is doubtful, since it would amount to inviting the U.S. or NATO military to establish a beachhead inside Syria from which rebels, terrorists and other insurgents could operate beyond the reach of military retaliation.

    Distrusting Clinton

    The Syrians and the Russians are also well aware of the duplicity of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011 when she led the effort to persuade the United Nations Security Council to authorize an emergency program to protect Libyan civilians around Benghazi from an offensive by the Libyan army seeking to root out Al Qaeda-connected terror groups

    Once the Security Council agreed (with Russia abstaining rather than vetoing the plan), U.S.-coordinated airstrikes decimated the Libyan government’s forces.

    [The reason Russia abstained was the belief that it would force the Libyan rebels and the Qaddafi government to come to the table sooner to hammer out a political solution. With that, then exceeding the resolution, the Jewmerica-led NATO deceitfully pounced and took the initiative for what the did next.]

    Next, NATO military advisers began assisting the rebels on the ground, with the “humanitarian” mission quickly morphing into a “regime change” operation, with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi driven from power, captured, tortured and murdered.

    After Gaddafi’s death on Oct. 20, 2011, Clinton exulted in a TV interview, “We came; we saw; he died.”

    So, a President Clinton isn’t likely to get the benefit of the doubt again, especially since she has made clear that her desire is to see Syrian President Bashar al-Assad suffer a fate similar to Gaddafi’s.

    Clinton’s open hostility toward Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom she’s compared to Hitler, also is not likely to make Russia eager for concessions.

    But Clinton’s repackaged “no-fly zone” – as a negotiated undertaking, rather than a unilateral act of war – suggests that the Democratic presidential nominee is at least trying to present a less warmongering face to the American voters, especially to peace-oriented Democrats.

    Whether the American people have any more faith in Clinton’s words than the Syrians and Russians do is another question.

  33. AJ October 23, 2016 @ 1:24 pm

    Trump was definitely on fire in his “Gettysburg speech”.

    Did he write this himself? Hear the speech:

    Pray for his safety. Among his proposals, a “lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.”

  34. Shell Shocked October 23, 2016 @ 6:36 pm


    Guess I’ll belabor the point even though there are bigger fish to fry here. Here’s the beginning of an interview a year ago, very short. I saw the whole thing on YouTube back when it was timely, then went to CNN to watch it there. CNN had cut this whole portion I’m posting.

    Because Hillary has made herself look like a fool; I think even Jake Tapper was taken aback by it at the time even though he is probably in the tank for her (who isn’t)? She laughs at inappropriate times, maybe to deflect or maybe it’s something else.

    She laughed at Benghazi to the point the Congresswoman querying her said she didn’t think it was funny, can’t remember the context.

    She had that big smile on her face the last debate when Trump called her on Arab contributions to the Clinton Foundation, especially when Trump mentioned the way they treat women and throw gays off of roofs. He asked her why she didn’t return the donations, and she ducked that one.

    I think she’s been coached to use certain mannerisms such as a big smile, a super big smile that people only do when they are elated, picking people in the audience and pointing at them as if in recognition, clapping, bobbing her head as if in yes. That’s all I can think of but it’s all so phony.

    I don’t know what the massive DOS attack was that took out much of the East Coast internet was the other day.

    It seems they might blame Russia, whereas maybe our govt is doing it (false flag). And possibly going to do more. Or it was something else entirely. I don’t necessarily see a conspiracy or malfactors in everything.

  35. Jmom October 23, 2016 @ 9:28 pm

    Dear Brother Nathanael,

    Another great vid! I love the background!

    Do you make a distinction between Jews and Ashkenazi Jews?

    It seemed all the rage a few years ago for truthers to say Ashkenazi Jews (of Jewish religion) instead of just Jews (of Jewish race and/or religion).

    Now the distinction seems to be on the wain except for a long article that I saw on the Anonymous Facebook page about the House of Rothschild. They claimed Rothschilds are Ashkenazi.

    Thank you

  36. Zionism is Terrorism October 24, 2016 @ 2:53 am

    Congrats Bro. Nate on reaching 100k subscribers.

    I wired a (Pay-Pal) donation to your blessed Christian ministry.

    I wanted to make you aware of a couple of Zionist-trolls who are lurking in the comments sections of your YouTube videos, spreading disinformation, and attacking you personally.

    One is StrnFn9099

    He made some vile comments about you in your videos: Can Jews Be Saved? Who’s Your Favorite Anti-Semite?

    Another one is Nicole Fitzgerald

    She attacked you personally in the comments section of your video Why I Left Judaism. I hope you will ban them.

    God bless you Bro. Nate.

    I pray for you and your Christian ministry, which has brought so many lost souls to the eternal love of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

  37. Herbert October 24, 2016 @ 8:15 am

    Does anyone know if the character Grima Wormtongue in the book the Lord of the Rings meant to represent the Jew?

    I know that these things happen in literature and Tolkein was a devout Catholic with quite an insight into the spiritual world.

    Many of Wormtongue’s characteristics mirror those of the Jew. For example:

    a) He only does evil
    b) He is the hidden power behind the throne
    c) He paralyzes the government from within (by casting a spell on the ruler) and therefore destroys the nation and leaves it at the mercy of its enemies
    d) He is a traitor and represents the interests of a foreign nation

    Just wondering.

  38. Good They Call Evil October 24, 2016 @ 8:43 am

    After I became aware of the Jew World Order JWO and the Jews Media tricks, I realized that the people and institutions which the Jews Media attacks most are those people and institutions which are the most Christian.

    As God’s Word warns us – Good they call evil and evil they call good. Any high profile Christian with much power or influence or even the potential for it becomes a target for the Jews media to smear and slander, ie Tim Tebow, Michele Bachman, Maria Sharapova.

    Foxjews is usually more subtle about attacking Christians because Foxnews plays the role of being news headquarters for conservatives and Christians. Foxnews occasionally shows their true colors, like when Fox Jew Chris Wallace did the hit job on Michele Bachman who was one of the few sincere Christians in office.

    Before my blindfold slipped off, when I knew nothing about the JWO, I believed all the Jews media hype about how evil Libya’s Khadaffi and Iraq’s Hussein were. Like nearly everyone else, I swallowed the kool-aid about Jimmy Carter being incompetent because he wouldn’t go to war against Iran during the “hostage crisis.”

    Generally speaking, what the Jews’ media calls good is probably evil and what the Jews’ media calls evil is probably good. Carter, Khadaffi, and Hussein were probably the good guys instead of the bad guys, because the Jews media calls good evil.

    David Duke is another example of how the media is obsessed with calling good evil. Anyone who does his homework on Duke and thinks for himself instead of believing the Jews media lies, can easily see that Duke is a fine Christian, just about opposite how big media portrays Duke.

    Conversely, when the Jews’ media praises a person, it’s a strong sign that person is corrupt. For example, consider how big media praised Bill Clinton. The Jews media claimed wicked Willie was doing a great job with the economy, defended Clinton from charges of rape and lewd behavior, and praised Clinton at every turn.

    Now that I’m aware of these Jews’ media tactics I have to think Carter, Khadaffi, and Hussein must have been good people because the Jews media tried so hard to portray them as bad.

    Good they call evil and evil they call good, just as Jesus warned, and Judaism became a dwelling place of demons.

  39. Jeremiah October 24, 2016 @ 11:18 am

    @Good they call evil and evil they call good

    Very, very good point

    That is exactly how Satan would want it — and they are Satan’s synagogue according to Jesus in Revelations 2 & 3

    M.S.M. are definitely public enemy No 1 and its great to see someone as high profile as a Presidential candidate saying it.

  40. Ted Gorsline October 24, 2016 @ 11:18 am

    Gordon Duff has an interesting take on Wikipedia saying it and Alex Jones, Paul Watson, Assad etc. are all Mossad operatives and he develops a good argument to support his contention.

    Like he says nobody knows who wiki leaks is. It’s Israeli with help from the USA.

    Most interesting he now, for the first time, says that what Israel wants is to destroy Christianity, essentially agreeing with what Bro Nat has been saying for many many years.

    Maybe he sees that Bro Nat is a rising star and is just trying another one of those glom on journalism tricks that VT is famous for…essentially trying to grab someone else’s audience, with sweet words for a while, and then discarding them…ala Fetzer, Henderson and Chip Tatum.

    My only concern about Duff is thats he mixes good arguments with utter nonsense (Keshe power) and he knows he is doing it. I can’t imagine why?

    His take on Wiki leaks is that it is Mossad and that it is designed to undermine Russia. He also says Russian media is very naive and Mossad infiltrated and that is very obviously true. RT makes me scratch my head.

    He does offer a very good argument that Alex Jones has been anti-Russian for years and he supports it with documentation.

  41. KathJuliane October 24, 2016 @ 7:49 pm


    Hillary Clinton is Wrong: OBGYN Says Abortion is Never Necessary to Save the Life of the Mother

    A lot of false and misleading information about late-term abortions is circulating around the internet after Hillary Clinton defended them during the last presidential debate.

    Clinton, a pro-abortion Democrat, told the American public that she supports late-term and partial-birth abortions. However, she tried to gain sympathy for her radical position by implying that most of these abortions are done when a woman’s life or health is at stake or when the baby has major health problems.

    In the days after the debate, abortion advocates produced a slew of expert comments and personal stories to support Clinton’s statements.

    One of the lies they have circulated is that late-term abortions are performed only in the rarest situations when the mother or child has physical health problems. Research does not support this, and several late-term abortion practitioners have admitted that women do have late-term abortions for “purely elective” reasons.

    Dr. Lawrence Koning, an OB-GYN in Corona, California, said Clinton also is wrong about late-term abortions being necessary to save a woman’s life or health, according to Christian News Network.

    “As an OB/GYN physician for 31 years, there is no medical situation that requires aborting/killing the baby in the third trimester to ‘save the mother’s life,’” Koning wrote on social media after the debate. Just deliver the baby by C-section and the baby has 95+% survival with readily available NICU care even at 28 weeks. C-section is quicker and safer than partial birth abortion for the mother.”

    There does appear to confusion between the premature delivering of a baby via induced labor or C-section and the intentional killing of a late-term baby either in or partially outside of the womb (partial-birth abortion). Both are being called abortions, but the situations are very different.

    With the first situation, the intention is to save as many lives as possible; the other situation involves purposefully killing a life. With the current debate, some abortion advocates are taking advantage of the misunderstanding to imply that pro-lifers oppose doctors’ actions in both situations and don’t care if women die.

    In the case of induced labor, doctors are doing the best they can to save both the mother and the child. Unfortunately, sometimes the baby is too young to survive outside the womb, and only the mother’s life can be saved.

    Pro-lifers are not opposed to this procedure that some are calling an “abortion.” What pro-lifers oppose is the willful, intentional and usually brutal destruction of that baby’s life in an abortion. And it is this intentional killing method that Koning and other doctors, including former U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, said is not necessary to save lives.

    Koop, a pediatric surgeon, said: “When a woman is pregnant, her obstetrician takes on the care of two patients—the mother-to-be and the unborn baby. If, toward the end of the pregnancy complications arise that threaten the mother’s health, he will take the child by inducing labor or performing a Caesarian section.

    “His intention is still to save the life of both the mother and the baby. The baby will be premature. The baby is never willfully destroyed because the mother’s life is in danger.”

    The Association of Pro-Life Physicians also contends that doctors never have to willfully kill an unborn child in an abortion to save a woman’s life.

    “When the life of the mother is truly threatened by her pregnancy, if both lives cannot simultaneously be saved, then saving the mother’s life must be the primary aim,” according to the doctors association.

    If through our careful treatment of the mother’s illness the pre-born patient inadvertently dies or is injured, this is tragic and, if unintentional, is not unethical and is consistent with the pro-life ethic. But the intentional killing of an unborn baby by abortion is never necessary.”

    Sadly, the mainstream media often perpetuates abortion activists’ claims that women’s lives do not matter to the pro-life movement. They do. Pro-lifers want to save lives, including women and children. Both matter equally to us, and it’s equally heartbreaking when medical emergencies cause a human life, born or unborn, to die.


    19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:

    20 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, that thou mayest obey His voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto Him: for He [is] thy life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them. — Deuteronomy 30:19 – 30:20 KJV

  42. Citizenfitz October 24, 2016 @ 8:19 pm

    @Good They Call Evil:

    “Now that I’m aware of these Jews’ media tactics I have to think Carter, Khadaffi, and Hussein must have been good people because the Jews media tried so hard to portray them as bad.”

    You’re on the right track but you’ve fallen into a false dichotomy fallacy.

    The fact that the Jew stream media is attacking someone doesn’t mean they’re good; only that for some reason Jewry is unhappy with them.

    The media is presently attacking Trump 24/7; but not because he’s good. Even though Trump is up to his eyeballs in Jews, for Jews being only up to your eyeballs in them isn’t enough.

  43. KathJuliane October 24, 2016 @ 9:08 pm

    Just like his co-regressive liberal-neocon interventionists in the White House and his goddess the Hildebeast, the Jewmerican poodle, Rasmussen, blames someone one else for the Libya fustercluck which grew to Middle Eastern and African regional proportions.

    Rasmussen is also beginning to sound like a croaking bullfrog.


    Ex-NATO boss: Libya still a ‘model intervention’

    “I don’t think you can blame Hillary Clinton or NATO,” says Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Libya’s post-intervention collapse.

    Five years after an armed revolution – supported by a NATO-led air campaign – resulted in the overthrow and death of Muammar Gaddafi, Libya continues to find itself in turmoil.

    The UN-backed government finds itself under repeated threat from armed militias.

    But who is to blame?

    In this week’s Headliner, former NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen defends the air strikes on Libya that led to the toppling of Gaddafi.

    According to Rasmussen, the ensuing turmoil in Libya isn’t due to NATO’s “model intervention,” but because the “international community did not follow up politically”.

    “It was a very successful military intervention,” Rasmussen says. “I had expected … the UN to stand ready to assist the new authorities, but the UN didn’t.”

    Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s latest book is The Will to Lead: America’s Indispensable Role in the Global Fight for Freedom.


    Ok, a little change of topic. I really, really, really want one of these:

    Sputnik: This Ain’t Grandpa’s Soviet Jeep: New UAZ Patriot Competes With Luxury SUVs

    People outside Russia probably have some ingrained misconceptions about Russian-made offroad-capable vehicles, imagining rickety 40-year-old jeeps that pay no mind to driver or passenger comfort.

    Make no mistake about it – those exist too, but the UAZ Patriot, a mid-size SUV produced by Ulyanovsk Automobile Plant, is definitely not one of them.
    Read More:

    I especially like the Patriot Syria Special Edition (just a little something for the WW3 rubble):

    Russia’s Answer to Daesh Jihad-Mobiles: Deadly UAZ Patriot Jeeps

    The Russian anti-terrorist operation in Syria is about to get more ‘patriotic’.

    On Friday, the Defense Ministry confirmed that it has deployed a group of UAZ Patriot pickups equipped with Kord 12.7 mm heavy machine guns and AGS-17 grenade launchers to the war-torn country.

    The vehicles are likely to be assigned to protect humanitarian convoys.

    Read more:

  44. Wikileaks Credibile? October 24, 2016 @ 9:22 pm

    Big time Jews media programs like 60 Minutes and others have had Wikileaks head Julian Assange on TV so much that Assange has to be in bed with them.

    Birds of a feather flock together and light has no company with darkness. If Assange was the real deal, the Jews media would be crucifying him instead of glorifying him, and would never have him on TV.

    The Jews media frequently quotes Wikileaks and talks about email or other documents exposed by Wikileaks, but you don’t see the Jews media talking about the Protocols of Zion POZ nor showing videos of WTC-7 collapsing without any plane or anything flying into it.

    There is never even a whisper from Wikileaks about the Jew World Order JWO that I’ve heard. So, Wikileaks seems like a way to subvert real whistleblowers, a source of dis-info, a way to influence what we believe about hacked emails and secret materials.

    Any news source which avoids POZ, 9/11, USS Liberty, and all such JWO crime, is controlled by the JWO or else that news source is run by blind sheep with no clue. If Wikileaks exposes anything significant it’s probably by mistake.

  45. KathJuliane October 25, 2016 @ 12:43 am

    Did Russia Hack the DNC … Really?

    Posted on October 24, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog

    Obama, Clinton and the mainstream media all say that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and released emails to throw the election to Trump.

    But former CIA, State Department, and House Intelligence Committee security expert Fred Fleitz notes:

    Only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies [as Hillary Clinton had claimed].

    And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks

    “. . . are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.

    “Such activity is not new to Moscow — the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europa and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there.

    “We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

    Saying we think the hacks “are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” is far short of saying we have evidence that Russia has been responsible for the hacks.

    Maybe high-level officials would have authorized them if Russian hackers were responsible, but the DNI and DHS statement did NOT say there was evidence Russia was responsible.

    Indeed, the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker,–

    –who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – says that Russia probably would not have used a “known” hacking method to gather and then leak DNC emails to sway the election.

    Instead – if it were Russia – they probably would have used a different, covert method, so people couldn’t see their fingerprints (like the U.S. did with the Stuxnet hack).

    Moreover, Binney said that he thought the hack may have been conducted by an NSA employee who was upset at Clinton’s careless handling of America’s most sensitive intelligence.

    On the other hand, the head of the organization which leaked the emails to the press – Julian Assange of Wikileaks – not only denied that it was the Russians, but has strongly and repeatedly hinted that the hacker was a DNC insider.

    Washington’s Blog asked NSA technical director Bill Binney about these two – NSA leaker and DNC leaker – and he explained:

    Both are clear possibilities.

    Also, there could be other governments, groups or individuals that hacked into HRC [i.e. Hillary Rodham Clinton] or the DNC and had the emails.

    Now the question is who sent them to Wikileaks? It could be any one of them or as Julian [Assange] somewhat implied that it was an insider in the DNC.

    If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and “no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans”) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.

    Which suggests they don’t have proof and just want to war monger the US public into a second cold war with the Russians.

    After all, there’s lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental complex of incestuous relationships.

    We asked Binney:

    What if the intelligence community spokespeople say “we can’t reveal the evidence we have that the Russians did it, because that would reveal our sources and methods?”

    He responded:

    If you recall, a few years ago they pointed to a specific building in China that was where hacks on the US were originating.

    So, let’s see the same from the Russians. They don’t have it. That’s why they don’t show it. They want to swindle us again and again and again.

    You can not trust these intelligence agencies period. (And see this.)

    The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of Dundee, Craig Murray, wrote last week:

    “I left Julian [Assange] after midnight. He is fit, well, sharp and in good spirits.

    “WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks.

    “The claim is nonsense. Journalists are also publishing that these were obtained by “hacking” with no evidence that this was the method used to obtain them.

    [We’ll update this post with a quote from Murray as soon as we reach him.]

    Remember also that the intelligence official – DNI Director Clapper – who pushed the claim that the Russian might be behind the hack guy who started is a documented liar and political hack.

    In any event, if Russia did hack the DNC emails, what does it actually mean? Well, the former head of both the CIA and NSA said:

    “I have to admit my definition of what the Russians did [in alleging hacking the Democratic National Committee] is, unfortunately, honorable state espionage.

    “A foreign intelligence service getting the internal emails of a major political party in a major foreign adversary? Game on. That’s what we do.

    “By the way, I would not want to be in an American court of law and be forced to deny that I never did anything like that as director of the NSA.

    In other words, even if Russia was the source of the DNC emails, the U.S. has done the same exact thing.

  46. Zionien October 25, 2016 @ 3:41 am

    I don’t know for sure, but from what I have seen/heard I think Trump is the better MAN in this election!

    I get it — he has to play along with some Jews, but I think that relationship will end quickly if he makes it. After all he still needs to plan for if he doesn’t win–right?!

    But for the most part he seems to me to be a more honest and credible candidate that I feel really does have the best interests of the American people.

    I will pray very hard for Trump to be our next POTUS!

    Killary is just all about the glamour & control = a real nut job, and her family — YIKES!!!

  47. KathJuliane October 25, 2016 @ 9:50 am

    An Establishment in Panic

    Patrick J Buchanan

    Pressed by moderator Chris Wallace as to whether he would accept defeat should Hillary Clinton win the election, Donald Trump replied, “I will tell you at the time. I’ll keep you in suspense.”

    “That’s horrifying,” said Clinton, setting off a chain reaction on the post-debate panels with talking heads falling all over one another in purple-faced anger, outrage and disbelief.

    “Disqualifying!” was the cry on Clinton cable.

    “Trump Won’t Say If He Will Accept Election Results,” wailed The New York Times. “Trump Won’t Vow to Honor Results,” ran the banner in The Washington Post.

    But what do these chattering classes and establishment bulletin boards think the Donald is going to do if he falls short of 270 electoral votes?

    Lead a Coxey’s Army on Washington and burn it down as British General Robert Ross did in August 1814, while “Little Jemmy” Madison fled on horseback out the Brookeville Road?

    What explains the hysteria of the establishment?

    In a word, fear.

    The establishment is horrified at the Donald’s defiance because, deep within its soul, it fears that the people for whom Trump speaks no longer accept its political legitimacy or moral authority.

    It may rule and run the country, and may rig the system through mass immigration and a mammoth welfare state so that Middle America is never again able to elect one of its own. But that establishment, disconnected from the people it rules, senses, rightly, that it is unloved and even detested.

    Having fixed the future, the establishment finds half of the country looking upon it with the same sullen contempt that our Founding Fathers came to look upon the overlords Parliament sent to rule them.

    Establishment panic is traceable to another fear: Its ideology, its political religion, is seen by growing millions as a golden calf, a 20th-century god that has failed.

    Trump is “talking down our democracy,” said a shocked Clinton.

    After having expunged Christianity from our public life and public square, our establishment installed “democracy” as the new deity, at whose altars we should all worship. And so our schools began to teach.

    Half a millennia ago, missionaries and explorers set sail from Spain, England and France to bring Christianity to the New World.

    Today, Clintons, Obamas and Bushes send soldiers and secularist tutors to “establish democracy” among the “lesser breeds without the Law.”

    Unfortunately, the natives, once democratized, return to their roots and vote for Hezbollah, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, using democratic processes and procedures to re-establish their true God.

    And Allah is no democrat.

    By suggesting he might not accept the results of a “rigged election” Trump is committing an unpardonable sin. But this new cult, this devotion to a new holy trinity of diversity, democracy and equality, is of recent vintage and has shallow roots.

    For none of the three — diversity, equality, democracy — is to be found in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist Papers or the Pledge of Allegiance. In the pledge, we are a republic.

    When Ben Franklin, emerging from the Philadelphia convention, was asked by a woman what kind of government they had created, he answered, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

    Among many in the silent majority, Clintonian democracy is not an improvement upon the old republic; it is the corruption of it.

    Consider: Six months ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the Clinton bundler, announced that by executive action he would convert 200,000 convicted felons into eligible voters by November.

    If that is democracy, many will say, to hell with it.

    And if felons decide the electoral votes of Virginia, and Virginia decides who is our next U.S. president, are we obligated to honor that election?

    In 1824, Gen. Andrew Jackson ran first in popular and electoral votes. But, short of a majority, the matter went to the House.

    There, Speaker Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams delivered the presidency to Adams — and Adams made Clay secretary of state, putting him on the path to the presidency that had been taken by Jefferson, Madison, Monroe and Adams himself.

    Were Jackson’s people wrong to regard as a “corrupt bargain” the deal that robbed the general of the presidency?

    The establishment also recoiled in horror from Milwaukee Sheriff Dave Clarke’s declaration that it is now “torches and pitchforks time.”

    Yet, some of us recall another time, when Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote in “Points of Rebellion”:

    “We must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III. Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If it does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution.”

    Baby-boomer radicals loved it, raising their fists in defiance of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew.

    But now that it is the populist-nationalist right that is moving beyond the niceties of liberal democracy to save the America that they love, elitist enthusiasm for “revolution” seems more constrained.

    What goes around comes around.

  48. benzion kook October 25, 2016 @ 11:40 am

    “If after having elected their man (woman) or group, obedience is not rendered to the Jew control, then you speedily hear of “scandals” and ” investigations” and “impeachments” for the removal of the disobedient.

    “Usually a man with a “past” proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that compromise him.

    “It has been commonly known that the Jewish manipulation of American election campaigns has been skillfully handled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient amount of evidence to discredit him unless he followed the dictates of his Jew ‘masters.’ -Henry Ford

  49. Hoff October 25, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

    No account of the Jewish Question in Germany can be complete without some mention of the tidal wave of sexual immorality that was to engulf the country during the period of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) following World War One.

    This also happened to be the apogee of Jewish power in Germany. Every single sphere of major influence had now fallen under Jewish control.

  50. I Was a Communist for the FBI October 25, 2016 @ 12:34 pm

    TCM is showing an old propaganda movie from 1951 titled “I Was a Communist for the FBI.”

    In 1951 there were still lots of people trying to make the world aware of Jew World Order plans like those documented by the Protocols of Zion.

    As a way to control the ideas, thinking, and beliefs on Jews running Communism, the Jews media was assigned the task of blaming Communism on Russia. It’s another blame the victim game. The Bolshevik Jews assassinated the Russian czar and murdered his children and then blamed it all on white Russia.

    Over the years that followed the assassination, Stalin and his Bolshevik Jews became known as Communists and murdered many millions of Christians. The murders were carried out mostly in secret. Victims simply disappeared and were not seen again. Naturally the Jews media helped keep it all hidden or distorted.

    Shortly after the Communist-for-the-FBI movie starts there is a discussion about Communists inciting Negroes into race riots. The subtle implication is that the Communists inciting the race riots are white Russians.

    As the movie progresses there are occasional hints and innuendo implying that Jews are the victims, exactly opposite the truth which is that Jews are the perpetrators.

    Even now in 2016, about 65 years after the Communist-for-the-FBI movie was released, the Jews media is running the movie again.

    It’s propaganda to make us hate Russia and think Russia is the enemy behind the race riots and evils and that Jews are just innocent victims.

    Good they call evil and evil they call good.

  51. Ted Gorsline October 25, 2016 @ 1:06 pm

    Perhaps the most useful thing about Trump is his “if in doubt-lash out temperment”.

    If people jerk him around like Jew-owned CNN has done, he will go after them.

    He is very thin-skinned, and has enough money and contacts to determine and confront those who are sticking it in his ear.

    Touchy president Trump and the pushy Jew boys both have the right temperment to destroy one another.

    Let the cat fight begin. We can only hope for mutually assured destruction.

    America will keep ticking over. Ronald Reagan ran the White House with full blown Alzheimer’s disease for solid two years. His wife consulted with the maid and they made all the hard decisions.

    Worked out OK.

  52. KathJuliane October 25, 2016 @ 2:49 pm

    Just a little reminder, RJN Family, not to open links on suspicious emails. (LOL!)
    ~~~*~~~ John Podesta Wasn’t ‘Hacked,’ He Fell For An Email Phishing Scam

    John Podesta didn’t have his email “hacked,” he fell for a phishing scam.

    Podesta had a Gmail account. Gmail’s servers were at no point hacked into or compromised.

    Podesta’s password was not guessed in some sort of brute force attack.

    He clicked a shady link sent to him in an email and then typed his password into a phishing site.

    Read between the lines from this UPI report:

    WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) — John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, had his email hacked by Russian operatives, security researchers confirmed Thursday.

    Podesta’s Gmail account was hacked using a fake login page with a URL associated with the hacker persona Fancy Bear, which has been tied to Russian interests.

    The connection was first reported by Motherboard. Politico reported it had also confirmed with a cybersecurity firm the connection between Podesta’s hacked account and Fancy Bear.

    U.S. intelligence officials have said Fancy Bear was behind the months-long effort to hack the Democratic National Committee and other Democratic groups.

    Clinton charged in Wednesday’s debate that Russia was hacking Democrats exclusively in a bid to help sway the election.

    Fancy Bear was also behind the hack of former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s email.

    Podesta’s email was hacked using what’s known as a spear-phishing technique.

    Podesta was sent a fake link that redirected him to a site built to look exactly like his usual Gmail login, but that instead enabled the hackers to get his password and recode his email to allow them access.

    The same URL was used in all the hacking attempts of the the DNC, Powell and other Democrats.

    This is the URL the bitly link redirected him to: (see web page)

    It took him to a fake login page on “” saying “someone has your password.”

    “Someone just used your password to try to sign in to your Google account,” the phishing email said. “Google stopped this sign-in attempt. You should change your password immediately.”

    According to these reports, Podesta actually clicked the “Change Password” link on “” and gave these scammers his password.

    This is “grandma’s first day on the internet” level idiocy.

    Nonetheless, as you can see from the article above, Clinton and her cronies in the government are acting like this was some sophisticated “hack” by the “Russians.”

    Of course, they refuse to provide any evidence Russians of any sort were actually behind the phishing scam.

  53. Fancy Bear October 25, 2016 @ 4:15 pm

    Sounds like you didn’t swallow the story of Russians hacking Podesta’s email KathJ.

    If the Russians were setting up a phony fishing site they wouldn’t use a name that has the word bear in it. Bear is often used as a symbol for Russia, so Russian spies wouldn’t use the name bear.

    You know who would use the name bear – the same people who planted the ID cards of “Muslim terrorists” on top of the WTC ruins, at the Hebdo murders, etc. We were supposed to believe that the plastic “terrorist ID cards” came through the WTC destruction in immaculate condition while steel melted and walls collapsed.

    Podesta level idiocy with his computer isn’t exactly rare among JWO puppets. Former CIA director John Deutch got busted for surfing porn sites on a computer that also had top secret stuff.

  54. Brother Nathanael October 25, 2016 @ 6:41 pm

    @Richard C

    Yes, received BOTH the $50 and the recent $20.

    Many thanks dear Richard! +Brother Nathanael

  55. KathJuliane October 25, 2016 @ 10:24 pm

    @Fancy Bear (lol)

    No, I don’t buy it completely. It’s all so convenient for Hillary, Queen of Pazuzu and her kingdom of the neocon Regressives, but it’s convenient for the neocon Republicans, too, because it serves to unite both parties in their hatred and demonization of Russia.

    And you must be reading my mind, because the name “Fancy Bear” (and a companion hacker team “Cozy Bear”) simply sticks out like a sore thumb, capitalizing on the West’s centuries’ old caricature of a “bear” stereotyping of Russians.

    The Russians didn’t come up with that themselves, but they’ve come to adopt it as a party symbol.

    The Russian Bear is a widespread symbol (generally of a Eurasian brown bear) for Russia, used in cartoons, articles and dramatic plays since as early as the 16th century,and relating alike to the Russian Empire, the
    Soviet Union and the present-day Russian Federation.

    It often was and is used by Westerners, originated in British caricatures and later also used in the US, and not always in a flattering context – on occasion it was used to imply that Russia is “big, brutal and clumsy”.

    It could be Russian humor among Russian spies making fun of Westerners and their “Russian bear” fetish.

    There are other attributes to bears, such as being slow to anger and preferring to go their own way and live and let live, unless threatened. A bear signals their intentions. If they become fiercely protective, they can attack with a speed and agility that most people seldom see.

    Humans can’t outrun bears.

    I lived off the grid in the North California mountains for almost 10 years, and had several encounters with black bears, all cordial.

    A bear that is surprised while its senses are compromised, e.g. while eating, may strike out without warning (dogs do the same thing); other than that, in my experience, bear signal their intentions.

    In situations where bears are feeding on a carcass, they are concerned about other bears that may be attracted to the carcass by smell.

    If a human suddenly appears in this situation he may trigger a preconditioned attack from a bear that was expecting that the feeding situation might attract another bear.

    Bears silently stalking humans for prey is extremely rare among bears, usually when bears are extremely hungry because humans have driven their natural prey out.

    On the same hand, the English enjoyed the blood sport of bear-baiting involving the worrying or tormenting (baiting) of bears by trained dogs into the 19th century. Queen Elizabeth I enjoyed bear and bull-baiting so much that she overruled Parliament’s ban of of the blood sport on Sundays.

    Also, the United Russia Party adopted the Eurasian bear as its emblem, so “Fancy Bear” keeps the bear meme alive in the context of Putin.

    So far more likely, it’s “our” government and/or contract hackers and/or private cybersecurity contractors for the DNC trying to frame Russia in order to build up Hildebeast’s rabid, foaming at the mouth hatred for Russia by evoking the Western. Of course I’m certain that Russia has their hand in things in the way of “honorable espionage”.

    Although I don’t discount Russian intereference completely, I believe that Putin and “the power vertical” of the Kremlin, while they gather all kinds of intelligence on our candidates so they can prepare for whomever is elected, they are generally honor-bound not to interfere in other countries’ internal political affairs or take partisan sides.

    On the pragmatic end, along with re-evaluating the long Soviet history of intervention, one of the military-political lessons Putin’s Kremlin learned from the Soviet-Afghanistan was not to take ideological sides of one political party over the other, which is how they got drawn into Afghanistan to begin with.

    Therefore I believe Putin when he said that Russia was practicing strict non-involvement in the 2016 presidential race. I know that it wasn’t an endorsement of Trump when Putin said way back when, that Trump was a “flamboyant” and “colorful” person

    At the time Putin wasn’t extolling Trump as a leader when Putin said that Trump was the “absolute leader of the presidential race”, but pointing out that at the time, Trump was way far ahead of the rest of the Republican pack in the primary race. But the Western Jew-media spun it that way.

    Moreover, I entirely believe Putin when he answered this question in the Bloomberg interview a few weeks ago, denying that Russia, or at least the Russian state, was involved in the DNP hacking:

    “The other accusation you’ve faced which is, they’ve said a lot, is that people connected with Russia or backed by Russia were the people who hacked into the Democratic Party’s database. And that, you would also say that is completely untrue?”

    “No, I don’t know anything about that. You know how many hackers there are today and they perform their work in such a filigreed and precise manner and they can show their tracks anywhere and anytime.

    “It may not even be a track, they can cover their activity so that it looks like hackers operating from other territories, from other countries.

    “It’s a very difficult thing to check, maybe not even possible. Anyway, we definitely do not do this at the State level.” (0:03:57 on the Video).

    Putin is entirely correct.

    US and allied government hackers, contract cybersecurity firms and freelancers for hire could just as easily set the attacks up for the Democrat Party to make it look like Russia is doing it, at least enough to point the finger at them.

    More than anything, the motive would be the goal to elbow Trump out of the race for guilt by association with Russia, largely inflated and exaggerated by the Western media.

    Anyway, I’m on the trail of connecting some dots.

  56. Ted Gorsline November 2, 2016 @ 1:28 am has post today about Hilary’s link to pedophilia on a website called “Able Danger.

    There is an alleged discussion on what the FBI really has on Clinton plus a neat little video with israeli intelligence officer, (from the 1990s) saying that ISIS means “Israeli Secret Intelligence Service”.

    There is a great little quote in the blog saing, Bill “Clinton’s downfall was a vagina. Hillary Clinton’s downfall will be a Weiner.”

  57. Ted Gorsline November 2, 2016 @ 1:29 am


    Humans can’t outrun bears but bears can’t outrun Mr Remington or Mr Winchester.

Leave a comment