Main Contents

Alex Jones Makes NYT Headlines!

The Brother Report, Brother Nathanael Channel, BroVids

Alex Jones Makes NYT Headlines!
August 8, 2018
©

Watch On +BN’s Own Channel ‘Censor-Free!’ HERE!


___________________________________

More +BN Vids!

A Future Surveillance World Here

Dress Rehearsal For The Antichrist Here

Who’s Applauding Internet Censorship? Here

Thought Police…Prison Without Bars Here

Let’s Make 9/11 ‘Jewish Remembrance Month!’ Here

Notes From A Gas Chamber Here
___________________________________
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Donate Via GoFundMe


Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Support +BN On Patreon

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Send this article/post as a PDF attachment to PDF | PDF Creator | PDF Converter

Brother Nathanael @ August 8, 2018

82 Comments

  1. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:34 pm

    Text–Text–Text

    Alex Jones Makes NYT Headlines!

    Making Headlines on the Jewish-owned New York Times is every journalist’s dream.

    But for Alex Jones it’s all trial and tribulation.

    Citing the removal of Infowars programming from major social media, the Times jabbed Jones as a trafficker in “unfounded” conspiracy theories mired with hate speech.

    But why “unfounded?”

    Are some conspiracy theories actually “founded” on evidence?

    After all, the term “conspiracy theory” is said to be invented by the CIA so as to prevent disbelief of BigGov narrations.

    But there’s a new kid on the block: hate speech!

    [Clip: “ADL and University of California at Berkeley’s D-Lab have been working to develop a new approach to tackle online hate using the latest methods. The goal of the Online Hate Index is to help tech platforms better understand the growing amount of hate on social media and to use that information to address the problem. By combining Artificial Intelligence and machine learning and social science the Online Hate Index will ultimately uncover and identify trends and patterns in hate speech across different platforms. We’ve just completed our first phase of research, and found that the machine learning model identified hate speech accurately between 78%-85% of the time. In the next phase of our project, we will look at specific targeted populations in a more detailed manner. We’ll examine content on multiple social media sites and we’ll identify strategies to deploy the model more broadly. While there’s still a long way to go with Artificial Intelligence and machine learning based solutions, we believe the Online Hate Index will help tech companies better understand the extent of hateful content on their platforms by creating community-based definitions of hate-speech.”]

    Now, are tech giants using this ‘hate speech’ terminology to blur the distinction between legitimate opinion and actual libel?

    It sure stumped Zuckerberg.

    [Clip: “Can you define hate speech?” “Senator, I think that this is really a hard question, and, and I think it’s one of the reasons we struggle with it.” “For months, and really for years, the tech companies have been reluctant to weigh in on a lot of these controversial speech issues, but it appears after months of criticism, the tech companies have finally said in the case of Alex Jones that enough is enough.”]

    Naah.

    ‘Enough is enough’ is a violation of the entire, at large, ‘community standards,’ not the standards of a tiny coterie of cyber-censors.

    Social media should be on par with public telecommunication companies.

    They don’t decide if you’re politically correct before providing services.

    Social media should be under the same constraints—not by BigGov—but by Internet users who expect a free flow of information.

    Jones had millions of viewers. Why not account for their consent? Doesn’t their voice count, too?

    How about ‘two point three million’ of them?

    [Clip: “I represent Parkland Florida and in this discussion of social media the first thing that comes to mind for me is the savage attacks on the student survivors of Stoneman-Douglas. One of the most virulent strains of these attacks was that the students didn’t survive a school shooting, that they were crisis actors, that they were planted by some mysterious cabal to finally get Congress to do something about gun violence. And in the weeks after the shooting, Alex Jones’s YouTube channel posted a video that was seen by two point three million subscribers alleging that these were merely, ahem, that these were actors and not real students.”]

    That’s Jones’ opinion, right or wrong.

    Whacky or tacky, he should still have his say, and we’ll decide if he’s a quack.

    For with no legal definition of ‘hate speech,’ cyber-censors decide what “speech” they “hate” others to hear…while ‘conspiracy theorists,’ like Jones, become anyone going off the prescriptive grid.

    After all, Jones refused to tout the 9/11 script.

    Is there only a ‘kosher’ side of the playbook?

    [Clip: “Where were you on September 11?”

    “Uhhm, you know, uhhh, I was home. And um, and so, that particular morning, because I have light colored hair and fair skin, and an annuity to the dermatologist, my wife, God bless her, had made an appointment for me, ahhh, at the doctor.”]

    Kind of ‘iffy,’ if you ask me.

    So why not let Jones have his say even if he’s kind of ‘iffy?’

    [Clip: “Alex Jones is the Internet’s most notorious conspiracy theorist, and with his site, Infowars, he’s peddled a number of dark and bizarre conspiracy theories.” “Sandyhook, it’s got ‘inside job’ written all over it.” “Want us to cover Pizzagate, we have covered it, we are covering it, and all I know is God help us, we’re in the hands of pure evil.”]

    Don’t like what you hear? Don’t want others to hear it?

    Call it ‘dark and bizarre’ and voila! the pinky on the censorship key hits delete.

    Like the kickoff of the Reign of Terror after the French Revolution, Jones got guillotined right smack in the middle of Cyberspace Square.

    And you, Mr and Mrs Journalist—even if you write for the New York Times—might just be next.

    Isn’t it time for an alternative Internet infrastructure?

    You better believe it!

  2. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:35 pm

    Watch This NEW Video Worldwide & In All EU Countries CENSOR FREE:

    “Alex Jones Makes NYT Headlines!” @

    http://brothernathanaelchannel.com/watch_video.php?v=1282

    This is my STATE-OF-THE-ART Video Platform AND I OWN It! It Bypasses ALL Jew-Censorship.

    ALL Jew-Ruled EU Countries Can NOW View ALL My Vids Without JEW-CENSORSHIP! @

    http://brothernathanaelchannel.com/

  3. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:35 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family,

    If you like my Videos & Articles please help me continue.

    Donate by GoFundMe (User Friendly!) @

    https://www.gofundme.com/brother-nathanael-campaign

    Donate by Click and Pledge @

    https://co.clickandpledge.com/sp/d1/default.aspx?wid=40066

    Bitcoin @

    https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/f2f8f89f-cf70-4f34-9251-609ea6484ebc

    MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    God Bless Us All! +Brother Nathanael

    ALL CASH DONATIONS COME IN SAFELY

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner @
    http://www.brothernathanaelfoundation.org/pics/BNAffirm.png

  4. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:37 pm

    My Videos Are ALSO Posted Here! @

    http://brothernathanaelchannel.com/watch_video.php?v=1282
    http://brothernathanaelfoundation.org/videos
    http://brovids.com
    https://www.patreon.com/BrotherNathanael
    https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9jIUp_1533784982
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/afuDF26ON5X1/
    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6rpn5y
    https://gab.ai/brothernathanael
    https://www.unz.com/video/channel/brothernathanael/

  5. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:37 pm

    Kick Off Moves Ahead!

    GoFundMe +BN Campaign! @
    https://www.gofundme.com/brother-nathanael-campaign

    Donate Via GoFundMe

    Let’s Keep A Good Thing Going!

  6. Brother Nathanael August 8, 2018 @ 8:54 pm

    Dear All,

    You heard it yourself:

    “Isn’t it time for an alternative Internet infrastructure? You better believe it!”

    It’s in the works: The BrotherNet!

    I’m working with experienced network engineers to launch an alternative Internet infrastructure that will EXCLUDE Jews from their poisoning, their censorship, and their wicked, free-speech hating agenda.

    I just need the funding!

    Why The BrotherNet

    The BrotherNet is a long term true Internet and digital infrastructure alternative, and ultimately an Internet replacement.

    The current Internet was built on the infrastructure of telephone lines, coax cable, and fiber communication lines intended for anything but what the Internet has evolved to today.

    Coax cable, originally intended for TV was found to be effective for delivering Internet. Eventually, people stopped using coax for TV and would get TV through their Internet connection in the form of streaming.

    This is the goal of The BrotherNet. At first, the Internet will be the primary network used to grow The BrotherNet, but eventually people will primarily access what is left of the Internet through the much bigger and pervasive BrotherNet.

    The current Internet was designed to allow free flow of communication and information between people. That free flow of information is what expanded the Internet like nothing we’ve ever seen.

    However, the Internet has become poisoned with Jew censors. Jew Censors who want to stop exactly what made the Internet thrive.

    BrotherNet is the preemptive solution to a sinking ship. We could wait until the Internet cannibalizes itself into nothing more than an interactive CNN ad on endless repeat…or we could now begin construction on what will be the next big Internet transitional revolution.
    ——————————————————-
    If you’re willing to help with FUNDING, please email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  7. Citizenfitz August 8, 2018 @ 9:46 pm

    Anyone remember how the kikes and their goy toys were sanctimoniously telling us, “If you don’t like it then don’t look at it,” when people complained about the porn and violence they were pushing in the media?

    What we have here is a failure to validate.

  8. T W Huning August 8, 2018 @ 10:31 pm

    Alex made the mistake of calling out and denouncing the Turlet Paper of Record (A.O. Shulzberger, Jr.) Not naming the Jews hasn’t saved him.

    Larry Zilfershtein, just as good an actor as Elie The Weasel, never has told us the name of the doctor he saw on that fateful day of infamy; neither has he been asked to name him.

    Herr Zilfershtein knew that Building Seven was rigged for demolition, and that it’s demise would be recognized as a demolition.

    So he concocted a story saying that it was razed at his suggestion to the fire marshal. If you can’t do any better than that, get a script writer, Larry!

  9. Lugu August 8, 2018 @ 10:58 pm

    “That’s Jones’ opinion, right or wrong.

    Whacky or tacky, he should still have his say, and we’ll decide if he’s a quack.”

    And THAT is the essence of the 1st Amendment which, not surprisingly, Jewtube and JewSA hates the most.

    Very well spoken, Brother Nathanael. What a super work. God Bless you.

  10. Karl B August 9, 2018 @ 2:04 am

    That woman from the ADL looks hateful as hell.

    Oop! Was that hate speech?

  11. Cornelius August 9, 2018 @ 2:51 am

    Who’s next?

  12. Lars August 9, 2018 @ 4:36 am

    I’m pretty sure that Jones had already been censored by the Jews.

    He could blow steam on everything the cabal was doing throughout the world, but he could not mention “they who must not be named.” The so-called Jews do not care that you know what they are doing, they’re actually proud of it. But you must not say that it is Jews who are behind it all or try to stop them.

    In my own circle of acquaintances if I mention the Jews by name there is a strong reaction every time. It’s as if I dropped the F bomb in the middle of my comment.

    There was a time in the early years that Jones would lay it squarely at the feet of the International Jews and Jewish Zionists. Then he says that he got threatened by the Mossad. That is when he shut up about the real culprits.

    He is right about things a good % of the time, but he will never tell you who is behind it. “The Banksters” or the “Elite” or the “Powers That Be” or the “Shadow Gov’t”, but never, never say that it’s the Israeli Jews.

  13. Anthony Clifton August 9, 2018 @ 8:40 am

    John 8:44: What tribe are the money changers from?

    Where are the Pharisees in the first Five books of the Bible?

    ( israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/COM-3.htm )

    Why does the Synagogue of Satan cult compound in Palestine claim to be “Israel” when the blessings of Deuteronomy 28 do not accrue to the Taxpayers in the “USA” cult compound…?

    Curiously the Bad Faith “religion” of mocking and scoffing and blaspheming never tells the truth ever.

    Mass Murder for filthy lucre is not a manifestation of the First Commandment.

  14. Ed August 9, 2018 @ 9:28 am

    Banning the Fat Man — what a joke all publicity.

    Just wait, he the Trojan Horseman will be back louder than ever.

    Same goes for Saint Julian Mossange

  15. Eileen Kuch August 9, 2018 @ 10:46 am

    You nailed it perfectly, Br. Nat, the Jewish Cyber-Censors violated the 1st Amendment by deleting Alex Jones’ website “Info-Wars”, as well as denying his 2.3 million viewers their 1st Amendment rights to watch his YouTube videos.

    You’re right in stating that Alex Jones stopped identifying the culprits who were behind JFK’s assassination, the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan, and the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 after he had received a death threat from the Mossad.

    Both Bolshevik and Zionist Jews used their influence over the USG around 1905 by funding the first attempt at overthrowing the Romanov Dynasty in Russia, followed by letting in such Bolshevik leaders as Leon Trotsky.

    Jacob Schiff was the chief financier of both the failed revolution of 1905 and the successful one of 1918.

    The Bolshevik/Zionist Jews actually took over the USG with the installment of their adulterous puppet, Woodrow Wilson in 1913; that was when the Rothschild Central Bank aka “Federal Reserve” was established, followed by the unconstitutional income tax law.

    The same tribe, Brother, was behind JFK’s assassination and the 9/11 terror attacks; and now is behind the deletion of Info-Wars from the Internet. Mike S. King’s website TomatoBubble.com may be next; I read every article Mr. King posts and he isn’t afraid of calling out the tribe’s name.

    I wish you the very best in your effort to create BrotherNet to elude the evil cyber-censors and I believe the Lord Jesus will help as well.

    God bless you always.

    Eileen

  16. KathJuliane August 9, 2018 @ 11:16 am

    God bless you, dear +BN.

    You hit a homerun on this one, clean out of the ballpark.

    And it’s entirely correct that the First Amendment doesn’t cover private corporations and internal policies.

    On the other hand, it’s very astute of you to point out that in basic form social media, especially the Online Monopoly Social Media Powers function as telecommunications companies in that they don’t create or produce much of anything, but are almost entirely engaged in the digital transfer of one person’s communications to another.

    Up until past year or two, the Social Monopolies, in face of threatening lawsuits, have fought tooth and nail to confirmed the idea that they are not producers nor broadcast media, such as radio and TV companies or cable TV, but merely a vehicle for social media communications.

    They have been very vocal about not being held responsible for anyone else’s created and produced content that is transmitted through their platforms, and that any claims of libel and slander rest entirely on the creator of the content.

    It seems to me that by going after Jones, Monopoly Social Media has now openly declared that they are, in fact, responsible for Hate speech — Hate smeesh.

    Aside from “hate” being a political thought police concept, there is no legal definition for “hate” because it is impossible to legislate against an emotion and define the feeling as a crime.

    In other words, defining “hate,” an ordinary emotion found within human nature, legally as a crime is impossible. Crimes are defined by motives, intent and action. While “hate” can be a motive behind a crime, mere “hate” without a criminal action is not legally a crime in itself.

    “Hate” according to Webster’s Dictionary online is defined as:

    a : intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear, anger, or sense of injury

    b : extreme dislike or disgust : antipathy, loathing had a great hate of hard work

    c : a systematic and especially politically exploited expression of hatred * a crime motivated by bigotry and hate —often used before another noun *hate mail * an organization tracking hate groups — see also hate crime

    The closest “hate” speech (that is, “emotional speech”) can become a crime is if the speech also included any direct incitement to commit an illegal act, crime or instigate any acts of violence, and the “doctrine of fighting words”.

    Dictionary.com — Legal gives the legal definition of “fighting words”:
    “n. words intentionally directed toward another person which are so nasty and full of malice as to cause the hearer to suffer emotional distress or incite him/her to immediately retaliate physically (hit, stab, shoot, etc.)

    While such words are not an excuse or defense for a retaliatory assault and battery, if they are threatening they can form the basis for a lawsuit for assault.”
    ( legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fighting+words )

    As for direct incitement, Reference.com gives this quick answer for the ‘Brandenberg Test’ concerning the nature of direct incitement:

    “The direct incitement test, also known as the imminent lawless test or Brandenburg test, is a standard that was established in Brandenburg versus Ohio for defining the limits of inflammatory speech that advocates illegal action.

    “Under the direct incitement test, the constitutional right of free speech is no longer protected if the speaker advocates to incite imminent lawless action that is likely to produce such action.”

    So far as I know from my scant exposure to him, Alex Jones, for all of his sensationalism, deficiencies and faulty logic, his inflammatory and sometimes mean-spirited and bizarre rhetoric and opinions, his shilling for Israel etc, he has never directly incited anyone to commit a crime or instigate any acts of violence that I am aware of.

    If he ever had directly instigated violence, particularly in his Bullhorn Jones days out on the streets, the entire world would have have heard about it.

    On the other hand, the Social Monopolies, mostly headquartered in ultra-progressive San Francisco and Silcon Valley, ignore the fact that everywhere on their hosted sites, Antifa and their Marxist-Leninist revolutionary intersectional political partners of various stripes constantly directly instigate violence towards conservatives, national conservatives, Christians, Southern cultural and historical associations, which in fact has played out time and again with antifa violence on the streets.

    We are starting to see filtered through the Social Monopolies’ platforms mob behavior in public places, such as Milo getting chased out of a NY bar and Tomi Larhen having water thrown at her; violent antifa mobs planned online showing up at various legally permitted conservative and cultura protests.

    Antifa and Black Lives Matter riot while the police watch, clearly instigated to violence by their loosely confederated political action leaders.

    Attacks on and shootings of conservatives, like Steve Scalise by a Bernie supporter become common and the social media platforms prevent people from discussing it.

    Cop assassinations and officer-shot incidents by criminals during the commission of crimes have increaded across America so much since the Ferguson, MO 2014 Unrest, so much so that they just don’t make national news headlines anymore.

    But none of that is considered “hate” according to the progressives’ “community defined” (meaning the corporate community’s) understanding of the word, as in the ADL’s Online Hate Index.

    The big Monopoly Social Media sites are essentially a quasi-public corporation and utility, just as the Big Railroad Barons of the 19th century and the 20th century’s ‘Ma Bell’ — the entire national telephone network.

    The Bell System was the system of companies, led by the Bell Telephone Company and later by American Telephone & Telegraph (AT&T), which provided telephone services to much of the US and Canada from 1877 to 1984, most of that time operating as a monopoly.

    On December 31, 1983, the system was divided into some 80 independent companies by a US DOJ mandate, nearly a decade after the agency’s filing of a 1974 antitrust lawsuit.

    According to investopedia, “A quasi-public corporation is a type of corporation in the private sector that is backed by a branch of government that has a public mandate to provide a given service.

    “Most quasi-public corporations began as government agencies, but have since become separate entities.” [Or, like AT&T or Pacific Gas and Electric, were private monopolies which became quasi-public utility companies - Kj]

    “It is not uncommon to see the shares of this type of corporation trade on major stock exchanges, which allows individual investors to gain exposure to the company’s profit.

    “A quasi-public corporation is actually a variation on the public-purpose corporation. Like the public-purpose corporation, the quasi-public corporation is created to benefit the public; however, a quasi-public purpose corporation is always operated privately, but the private owners usually have partial government funding or government-chartered mission.

    While shares of this type of corporation are sold publicly, creating value and profit for shareholders is a secondary purpose to carrying out its public purpose.

    “The operations of a quasi-public corporation must usually, in some way, contribute to the comfort, convenience or welfare of the general public.

    “A few examples of quasi-public companies include telegraph and telephone companies, oil and gas, water, and electric light companies, and irrigation companies. Quasi-public corporations are often referred to as public service corporations.

    Quasi-public corporations may comprise public companies of an industrial and commercial character, nationalized companies, and companies with majority public shareholding.

    “Many consider quasi-public institutions to be political policy tools because they can, in certain cases, operate with fewer restrictions and greater cost effectiveness than normal public institutions.”

    So the Social Monopolies translated their economic power into political power, taking on government contracts, and now the government has them by the tail, making them defacto non-government organizations contracted to the US government as well.

    Not only that, Zuckerburg (who for some strange reason always looks like the Star Trek character Data’s cousin in photographs) has decided to outsource the entire hot potato “hate speech” issue to the Atlantic Council.

  17. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 1:54 pm

    BroN On Rense Radio Tonight!
    “Censorship And The BrotherNet”
    9pm Pacific Time @
    https://www.renseradio.com/

  18. KathJuliane August 9, 2018 @ 2:59 pm

    The Duran: Facebook teams up with NATO to censor news (Video)

    A new Reuters report confirms that social media censorship is taking a chilling geopolitical effect, as Facebook has been revealed as a top donor to the Atlantic Council, alongside Western governments, Gulf autocratic regimes, NATO, various branches of the US military, and a number of major defense contractors and corporations.

    In May Facebook announced that it was outsourcing much of its political “fact-checking” to the Atlantic Council, the PR arm of NATO, and more specifically, four individuals within the Atlantic Council will form a “Digital Forensic Lab (DFR Lab)” so as to help the billion dollar tech giant spot those pesky Russian election meddling trolls…

    Because God knows, Facebook simply does not have the money or know-how to hire its own team of “fact checkers,” something that a publisher platform of Facebook’s size would naturally do in house as it formulates its editorial position.

    The team of four total individuals running the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFR Lab) will be lead by a former National Security Council advisor for the last four years of the Obama administration, Graham Brookie, who is also its founder.

    RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou examine the dangerous partnership between the NATO military alliance and Facebook.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJPN1zKPi0

    Zerohedge reports…

    “This is not at all comforting: during a week that’s witnessed Alex Jones’ social media accounts taken down by Facebook, Apple, Spotify and Google, and what appears to be a growing crackdown against alternative media figures including several prominent Libertarians, notably the Ron Paul Institute director, and the Scott Horton Show, who found their Twitter accounts suspended — we learn that the Atlantic Council is directly advising Facebook on identifying and removing “foreign interference” on the popular platform.

    “While the initiative was initially revealed last May through an official Facebook media release, more details of the controversial think tank’s role have been revealed.

    “Supposedly the whole partnership is aimed at bringing more objectivity and neutrality to the process of rooting out fake accounts that pose the threat of being operated by nefarious foreign states.”

    Apparently the four person NATO team advising Facebook on flagging “propaganda” has already pushed Facebook into taking action against over two dozen “suspicious pages” flagged potential foreign actors such as Russia.

    Reuters reports…

    “Facebook is using the group to enhance its investigations of foreign interference.

    “Last week, the company said it took down 32 suspicious pages and accounts that purported to be run by leftists and minority activists. While some U.S. officials said they were likely the work of Russian agents, Facebook said it did not know for sure.”

    Pages were removed even while Facebook, under its own admission stated “it did not know for sure” if the pages were the work of “Russian agents” (whatever that even means anymore).

    WikiLeaks

    @wikileaks
    The suspiciously simultaneous censorship of Infowars by Google, Apple, Facebook came just one week after U.S. Senate intelligence committee hawk Mark Warner (D) circulated this policy paper threatening new regulation against those same media companies: https://graphics.axios.com/pdf/PlatformPolicyPaper.pdf

    1:12 PM - Aug 7, 2018

    Via Zerohedge…

    “The Facebook-Atlantic Council alliance reportedly springs from the social media giant’s finding itself desperate for outside “neutral” help after a swell of public criticism, mostly issuing from congressional leaders and prominent media pundits, for supposedly allowing Russian propaganda accounts to operate ahead of the 2016 elections.

    “And in perhaps the most chilling line of the entire report, Reuters says, “But the lab and Atlantic Council bring geopolitical expertise and allow Facebook to distance itself from sensitive pronouncements.”

    “This is ostensibly to defuse any potential conflict of interest arising as Facebook seems a bigger presence in emerging foreign markets.

    “Facebook’s chief security officer Alex Stamos recently told reporters, “Companies like ours don’t have the necessary information to evaluate the relationship between political motivations that we infer about an adversary and the political goals of a nation-state.”

    “He explained further that Facebook would collect suspicious digital evidence and submit it to “researchers and authorities”.

    “Since at least May when the relationship was first announced, the DFR Lab has been key to this process of verifying what constitutes foreign interference or nefarious state propaganda.

    “But here’s the kicker. Reuters writes of the DFR Lab’s funding in the following:

    ‘Facebook donated an undisclosed amount to the lab in May that was enough, said Graham Brookie, who runs the lab, to vault the company to the top of the Atlantic Council’s donor list, alongside the British government.

    Facebook employees said privately over the past several months that Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg wants to outsource many of the most sensitive political decisions, leaving fact-checking to media groups and geopolitics to think tanks.

    Facebook has defended the process as part of ensuring that it remains politically neutral, yet clearly the Atlantic Council itself is hardly neutral, as a quick perusal of its top donors indicates.

    Among the DFR Labs partners include UK-based Bellingcat, which has in the past claimed “proof” that Assad gassed civilians based on analyzing YouTube videos and Google Earth. And top donors include various branches of the US military, Gulf states like the UAE, and notably, NATO.

    The Atlantic Council has frequently called for things like increased military engagement in Syria, militarily confronting the “Russian threat” in Eastern Europe, and now is advocating for Ukraine and Georgia to be allowed entry into NATO while calling for general territorial expansion of the Western military alliance.

    Further it has advocated on behalf of one of its previous funders, Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and gave a “Distinguished International Leadership” award to George W. Bush, to name but a few actions of the think tank that has been given authorization to flag citizens’ Facebook pages for possible foreign influence and propaganda.

    Quite disturbingly, this is Mark Zuckerberg’s outside “geopolitical expertise” he’s been seeking.

    http://theduran.com/facebook-teams-up-with-nato-to-censor-news-video/

    ~~~*~~~

    And, chasing the white bunny around the Monopoly Social Media maze even more, particularly Facebook and it’s ties to the Atlantic Council, we get to Dmitri Alperovitch (CTO) who is one of three co-founders of the 2011 Google-funded start-up CrowdStrike in 2011 along with entrepreneur George Kurtz (CEO), Dmitri Alperovitch and Gregg Marston (CFO, retired).

    In 2012, Shawn Henry, President of CrowdStrike, who led both the FBI’s criminal and cyber Divisions, was hired to lead sister company CrowdStrike Services, Inc., which is focused on proactive and incident response services.

    CrowdStrike, a private company, was called in to handle the DNC breach and hacks (DNC is also a private non-profit corporation), and decided within one day that it was the Evil Russkis. CrowdStrike’s frequently cited findings of Russian responsibility by CrowdStrike, the DHS, DNI, and FBI, and then used in the various congressional hearings, were essentially paid for by the DNC, which contracted its services in June of 2016.

    The DNC refused to allow official forensic analysts from the FBI or other intelligence agencies to examine the DNC servers that was supposedly hacked by the Russians according to CrowdStrike. As such, there is no independent assessment of the organization’s breached servers by the FBI or any other intelligence service.

    At some point, the FBI obtained an image copy of the server(s) to examine, I believe. It’s not known if the image was directly obtained by the FBI, therefore having a documented chain of evidence, or if it was a copy handed over by DNC/CrowdStrike.

    This unvetted CrowdStrike private “intelligence” report of nothing but speculations, which blamed the Russians then became the foundation for the first intelligence report generated jointly by the FBI, DHS and the DNI in late 2016 (just three intelligence agencies; not even representing the consensus of the “intelligence community”).

    This report was deliberately headed at the top with a boxed disclaimer stating that the trio of agencies could not vouch for the 3rd party data given them by CrowdStrike, which has ties to all sorts of anti-Russia organizations and individuals, which went into their own evidence-free assessments in a major case of “confirmation bias” if there ever was one.

    Who’s to say that maybe CrowdStrike and their choice cyber partners secretly “hacked” the DNC in order to blame Russia and drum up cyber-security, intelligence, anti-hacking business for themselves. That is, CrowdStrike made unauthorized “proactive” cybersecurity stress testing and analysis by controlled hacking, malware attacks, and phishing.

    CrowdStrike, in 2016 a rising star in the cybersecurity world, was not only called in to investigate the DNC hacks, it was also an approved government contractor under the Obama administration who has had, and certainly still has, government contracts throughout the federal system for cyber-security, intelligence, investigation, and training, including once or twice for the FBI, as well as for the DOD.

    Dmitri Alperovitch is also a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council, an Russian expat, not a US citizen, and considers himself “Putin’s worst nightmare”, right alongside Bill Browder.

    I can’t confirm that Soviet-born Dmitri Alperovitch is a Jew, born in Moscow in 1980. However, Alperovitch, an old Jewish name from at least the Russian imperial era, comes from the German Alper, which is a cognate of the Abraham, according to the Guggenheimer Jewish Family Names and Their Origins: An Etymological Dictionary

    Alperovich is a very common Lithuanian, Baltic & Belorusian Jewish patronymic and surname with German origins, in which case, ol’ Dmitri is most likely an ethnic Soviet-era Jew. I wonder if he also has Israeli citizenship, too?

    In any case, Dmitri Alperovitch is a nonresident senior fellow with the Cyber Statecraft Initiative at the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security.

    The Atlantic Council describes their Cyber Statecraft Initiative:

    “Through global engagement and thought leadership, the Atlantic Council’s Cyber Statecraft Initiative focuses on international cooperation, competition, and conflict in cyberspace.

    Cyberspace is similar to many physical realms, but it truly stands apart as a unique domain. While some of the levers of statecraft that deal with cyberspace may be the same as in the real world; some may seem the same yet operate differently, and others may be completely novel.

    Cyber statecraft will be a key tool to guide policymakers through the maze of regulation in cyberspace.

    Our experience is that the education and experience of most diplomats, government executives, and military officers is far more relevant than they have been led to believe.

    Accordingly, one of the Initiative’s main areas of emphasis is to bring together the new field of cyber statecraft with traditional national security and international relations to finally make progress on the many issues vexing the US and other governments.”

    (.cybersecurityintelligence.com/atlantic-council-1281.html)

    Atlantic Council, has strong ties to Hillary Clinton, a think tank with openly anti-Russian sentiments that is also partly funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who also happened to donate at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.

    Counterpunch ran an important skeptical article in March 2017 titled: Cybersecurity Firm That Attributed DNC Hacks to Russia May Have Fabricated Russia Hacking in Ukraine.

    They point out that 2013, the Atlantic Council awarded their darling, Hillary Clinton, it’s Distinguished International Leadership Award.
    (.counterpunch.org/2017/03/23/cybersecurity-firm-that-attributed-dnc-hacks-to-russia-may-have-fabricated-russia-hacking-in-ukraine/ )

    In 2014, the Atlantic Council hosted one of several events with former Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. Yatsenuk was one of the US State Department’s pick for Kiev’s usurper government whose handler was Victoria Nuland after the Euromaidan coup which ousted President Viktor Yanukovych.

    The Chairman of Alphabet, Inc. (Google’s parent company), Eric Schmidt, was actively working to help the Hillary campaign in 2015. Eric Schmidt created and funded his stealth startup called “Groundwork” as “a major technology vendor for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, underscoring the bonds between Silicon Valley and Democratic politics,” per Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkreig in October 2015:

    “The Groundwork, according to Democratic campaign operatives and technologists, is part of efforts by Schmidt—the executive chairman of Google parent-company Alphabet—to ensure that Clinton has the engineering talent needed to win the election. And it is one of a series of quiet investments by Schmidt that recognize how modern political campaigns are run, with data analytics and digital outreach as vital ingredients that allow candidates to find, court, and turn out critical voter blocs.

    “There is also another gap in play: The shrinking distance between Google and the Democratic Party. Former Google executive Stephanie Hannon is the Clinton campaign’s chief technology officer, and a host of ex-Googlers are currently employed as high-ranking technical staff at the Obama White House. Schmidt, for his part, is one of the most powerful donors in the Democratic Party—and his influence does not stem only from his wealth, estimated by Forbes at more than $10 billion.

    “According to campaign finance disclosures, Clinton’s campaign is the Groundwork’s only political client. Its employees are mostly back-end software developers with experience at blue-chip tech firms like Netflix, Dreamhost, and Google.”
    (.libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/10/13/meet-groundwork-google-chairman-eric-schmidts-stealth-startup-working-to-make-hillary-clinton-president/ )

    Is there even any daylight between the Democrat Party and Silicon Valley anymore in what is revealing itself to be a growing collusion of tyrannical authoritarian censorship on their quest to uphold the ideals of “free speech”?

  19. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 3:36 pm

    TONIGHT!
    BroN On Rense Radio!
    “Censorship And The BrotherNet”
    9pm Pacific Time @
    https://www.renseradio.com/

  20. Steve Oz August 9, 2018 @ 4:39 pm

    Jones gets dropped from 5 platforms at the same time, really?

    That is conspiracy writ large.

  21. KathJuliane August 9, 2018 @ 4:53 pm

    RT: Digital Sherlocks: Facebook relies on govt-tied experts to track foreign meddling

    Facebook may have closer ties to Washington than previously thought.

    It’s now emerged the social media giant is relying on experts funded by branches of the US government and NATO when it comes to tracking foreign influence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDHUcu3i1kE&t

  22. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 5:42 pm

    Keep It Kicking!

    GoFundMe +BN Campaign! @
    https://www.gofundme.com/brother-nathanael-campaign

    Donate Via GoFundMe

    Let’s Keep A Good Thing Going!

  23. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 5:43 pm

    Why The BrotherNet

    The BrotherNet is a long term true Internet and digital infrastructure alternative, and ultimately an Internet replacement.

    The current Internet was built on the infrastructure of telephone lines, coax cable, and fiber communication lines intended for anything but what the Internet has evolved to today.

    Coax cable, originally intended for TV was found to be effective for delivering Internet. Eventually, people stopped using coax for TV and would get TV through their Internet connection in the form of streaming.

    This is the goal of The BrotherNet. At first, the Internet will be the primary network used to grow The BrotherNet, but eventually people will primarily access what is left of the Internet through the much bigger and pervasive BrotherNet.

    The current Internet was designed to allow free flow of communication and information between people. That free flow of information is what expanded the Internet like nothing we’ve ever seen.

    However, the Internet has become poisoned with Jew censors. Jew Censors who want to stop exactly what made the Internet thrive.

    BrotherNet is the preemptive solution to a sinking ship. We could wait until the Internet cannibalizes itself into nothing more than an interactive CNN ad on endless repeat…or we could now begin construction on what will be the next big Internet transitional revolution.
    ——————————————————-
    If you’re willing to help with FUNDING, please email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  24. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 5:46 pm

    ON THE AIR TONIGHT!
    BroN On Rense Radio!
    “Censorship And The BrotherNet”
    9pm Pacific Time @
    https://www.renseradio.com/

  25. Seek The Truth August 9, 2018 @ 7:50 pm

    What I notice about the above video clip by this unknown freaky looking woman talking about internet censorship is the diagram showing a huge red balloon called “White Rights” meaning that it’s enormous hate speech to defend European or Russian Christian heritage involving White people.

    It’s obvious that the ADL and SPLC and other Jew groups would like to put White people and especially Christians in giant outdoor starvation pens in order to prevent them from hating!

    Hasn’t that always been the goal of Judaism which is to kill off the strongest component of Christianity; namely White people. Wasn’t that the basic reason for the Jewish Bolshevik revolution in Russia.

    The darker races with lower I.Q.s will be much easier to enslave when Whites are exterminated or have been mongrelized into coffee colored dumbed down slaves. Then Jews can reign supreme as the dominant “master race” on the planet according to the Talmud.

  26. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 8:36 pm

    @Seek the truth

    The “freaky looking woman” in the ADL clip is a JEW, a CHRIST-HATING, FREE-SPEECH Hating JEW.

    Who said, “The Jews Are Our Misfortune?”
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=717

    Just an average observant man. +bn

  27. Brother Nathanael August 9, 2018 @ 8:55 pm

    Dear All,

    I need funding, I know how to turn the masses against the wicked Jews.

    I also have an Internet alternative infrastructure project ready to implement.

    Also, I am prepared to launch billboards; TV ads; and MORE.

    The wickedness of Jewry CAN be removed from public affairs, the press, and the Internet.

    JEWry’s pernicious influence CAN be erased.

    I JUST NEED THE FUNDING.

    Email me at:
    bronathanael[at]yahoo[dot]com

    Write to me at:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation
    POB 547
    Priest River ID 83856

  28. Henry Ford Was Right August 10, 2018 @ 8:18 am

    So Rothschild-ZOG Intl’ is using academia in Northern California to develop a way to find ‘hate speech’ (aka speech (((THEY)))) hate)?

    That’s the same region that gave the World uber big-brother via Jewbook, Jewoogle, and as a Neocon shyster Jew mafia fake opposition Michael ‘Savage’ (not that anyone with two brain cells to rub together believes his neocon cuck Jewish hustler arse) likes to call it ‘San Fransicko’.

    Yeah ‘Savage’ we know you spend your shekels you make via tricking the cuckservatives to live in a place full of the demographics you claim to be resisting for God, truth, and the American way being the good paytriot that you are just like Alex Jewnes.

    I guess all the coastal views, fine dining, wineries, over priced real estate, and luxury goods vendors don’t hurt you in your cause of paytriotism do they Mr. Savage (’Weiner’).

  29. Hillary August 10, 2018 @ 9:41 am

    Dostoyevsky Quote

    “A man who lies to himself is often the first to take offense. It sometimes feels very good to take offense, doesn’t it?

    And surely he knows that no one has offended him, and that he himself has invented the offense and told lies just for the beauty of it, that he has exaggerated for the sake of effect, that he has picked on a word and made a mountain out of a pea — he knows all of that, and still he is the first to take offense, he likes feeling offended, it gives him great pleasure, and thus he reaches the point of real hostility.”

  30. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 10:35 am

    Why The BrotherNet

    The BrotherNet is a long term true Internet and digital infrastructure alternative, and ultimately an Internet replacement.

    The current Internet was built on the infrastructure of telephone lines, coax cable, and fiber communication lines intended for anything but what the Internet has evolved to today.

    Coax cable, originally intended for TV was found to be effective for delivering Internet. Eventually, people stopped using coax for TV and would get TV through their Internet connection in the form of streaming.

    This is the goal of The BrotherNet. At first, the Internet will be the primary network used to grow The BrotherNet, but eventually people will primarily access what is left of the Internet through the much bigger and pervasive BrotherNet.

    The current Internet was designed to allow free flow of communication and information between people. That free flow of information is what expanded the Internet like nothing we’ve ever seen.

    However, the Internet has become poisoned with Jew censors. Jew Censors who want to stop exactly what made the Internet thrive.

    BrotherNet is the preemptive solution to a sinking ship. We could wait until the Internet cannibalizes itself into nothing more than an interactive CNN ad on endless repeat…or we could now begin construction on what will be the next big Internet transitional revolution.
    ——————————————————-
    NEED FUNDING, please email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  31. KathJuliane August 10, 2018 @ 11:18 am

    RT: American college applicant questioned about following Alex Jones’ Twitter

    Monitoring who or what people follow online is already having repercussions for one American student.

    During a college interview, the 17-year-old wasn’t asked about his educational success, but why he follows Alex Jones on Twitter - a controversial show host, recently banned by several social networks.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CA_UXG9DGQ

  32. Citizenfitz August 10, 2018 @ 11:35 am

    “For where the carcass is there the vultures will gather.” - Luke 17:37

    “(Jews) are the vultures of humanity. They are a state within a state. They are certainly not real citizens. The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of these people…. They are the master robbers of the modern age.” - Napoleon Bonaparte

    Thanks to Napoleon for helping decipher this saying of Jesus’.

  33. Eugene August 10, 2018 @ 12:40 pm

    Alex Jones should be jumping with joy that he has this attention.

    He bragged and bragged that he was or wanted to be known as the leader of the patriotic movement.

    Alex shouldn’t be missed. All his news is old stuff anyway. He’s memorized all the proper One World themes to fence his listeners in to his version of what he wants his listeners to believe.

    Alex should be glad that they picked him. He’s their first example.

  34. KathJuliane August 10, 2018 @ 1:07 pm

    Ron Paul Liberty Report: Behind The Scenes At The Twitter Purge - With Peter Van Buren and Scott Horton

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF1VeiZ6Tuw

  35. ricck lineheart August 10, 2018 @ 2:00 pm

    And Hitler did what?

    Once in the near past Americans would brag about our ‘ Freedoms ‘ and nearly always Freedom of Speech came to mind.

    But now today its only freedom of Kosher Approved Speech.

    Thank You Brother Nathanael ever so much! God Bless and keep You!

  36. Steven Rowlandson August 10, 2018 @ 2:44 pm

    @All

    Alex’s Jewish wife insurance policy is not working.

  37. Kalin August 10, 2018 @ 2:53 pm

    @All

    All of this, including the Jew push for gun control is to protect Jews in their evil conduct.

  38. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 3:03 pm

    Dear All,

    If you like my Videos please help me continue.

    Donate by GoFundMe (User Friendly!) @
    https://www.gofundme.com/brother-nathanael-campaign

    Donate by Click and Pledge @
    https://co.clickandpledge.com/sp/d1/default.aspx?wid=40066

    Bitcoin @
    https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/f2f8f89f-cf70-4f34-9251-609ea6484ebc

    MAIL: Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    ALL CASH DONATIONS COME IN SAFELY

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner @
    http://www.brothernathanaelfoundation.org/pics/BNAffirm.png

  39. Kiimm August 10, 2018 @ 7:03 pm

    Hi Dear Brother Nathanael,

    Thank you for all you do.

    Forgive me, for I have nothing to contribute except this.

    Jesus - King of King and Lord of Lords!

    God Bless all you in the world on a lovely shabbat night!

    https://youtu.be/RjEehbjbIAY
    https://youtu.be/F4vgl4ZVvc8
    https://youtu.be/dEFFF6nQZGQ

  40. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 7:18 pm

    Why The BrotherNet

    The BrotherNet is a long term true Internet and digital infrastructure alternative, and ultimately an Internet replacement.

    The current Internet was built on the infrastructure of telephone lines, coax cable, and fiber communication lines intended for anything but what the Internet has evolved to today.

    Coax cable, originally intended for TV was found to be effective for delivering Internet. Eventually, people stopped using coax for TV and would get TV through their Internet connection in the form of streaming.

    This is the goal of The BrotherNet. At first, the Internet will be the primary network used to grow The BrotherNet, but eventually people will primarily access what is left of the Internet through the much bigger and pervasive BrotherNet.

    The current Internet was designed to allow free flow of communication and information between people. That free flow of information is what expanded the Internet like nothing we’ve ever seen.

    However, the Internet has become poisoned with Jew censors. Jew Censors who want to stop exactly what made the Internet thrive.

    BrotherNet is the preemptive solution to a sinking ship. We could wait until the Internet cannibalizes itself into nothing more than an interactive CNN ad on endless repeat…or we could now begin construction on what will be the next big Internet transitional revolution.
    ——————————————————-
    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE! Please email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  41. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 7:20 pm

    BrotherNet Is A Comprehensive Solution
    To Jew Censorship

    Rolling back the oppression of free speech and free commerce on the internet by Jewry

    Phase 1A:
    The BrotherNet virtual private network, or VPN service, will provide access to the local infrastructure of the BrotherNet as well as access to the rest of the internet.

    This VPN would allow anyone with an internet connection to access the BrotherNet.

    Phase 1B:
    BrotherNet Archival Servers will manage both local websites (accessible only from within the BrotherNet network) as well as external websites that are on the conventional internet.

    BrotherNet users can flag a website or video that they think has a high likelihood of being censored and the BN Archival Servers will make a local copy permanently accessible to anyone on the BrotherNet.

    When content is inevitably censored from the internet, the BrotherNet servers will first try and load the deleted content. When the page doesn’t load from the internet, the page will be loaded anyway but from the BN Archival Servers along with a small notification at the top of the page, indicating that the page is only accessible to those on the BrotherNet.

    Phase 2:
    It will also be necessary to create an independent communication medium for phone & email. This can be done at the end of Phase 1, and can be expanded during Phase 3.

    Phase 3:
    As BrotherNet grows in size and popularity, access may be restricted to the BrotherNet servers on some ISPs. BrotherNet must then become its own ISP, providing direct physical access to the BrotherNet via cell towers, or internet cables.

    Internet access will still be possible through the BrotherNet, and censored content supplemented by the BN Archival Servers.

    Eventually, it may also be necessary to create a parallel internet backbone depending on funding and level of censorship.

    Phase 4:
    A financial transaction system will ultimately be necessary, providing access to funding and payment transfers between BrotherNet users.

    Phase 5:
    As BrotherNet grows, a legal team will be required to manage the inevitable lawsuits surrounding hosting information that is slated for removal from the internet.

    Notes: Services can be free initially to build a user base, however, at some point charging money for VPN, physical internet access, communication, and hosting will become lucrative business ventures. Creating a financial transaction company will also yield income.

    A BrotherNet ‘Constitution’ of sorts should be drafted. It would outline censorship policies, freedom of speech, and other goals.

    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE!
    Email me:

    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  42. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 7:26 pm

    BrotherNet Is A Comprehensive Solution
    Off and Running!
    $10,000 Server Just Donated To The BrotherNet Project By Former ISP Owner!

    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE! @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

    Email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  43. Brother Nathanael August 10, 2018 @ 7:36 pm

    We don’t need another Facebook. We don’t need another Youtube. Or gab.ai, or now erased vid.me, and disappeared pew.tube. We need a whole new construct.

    If your garden is riddled with pests, weeds, the ground is infertile; you don’t take your healthy seeds and plant them there. You find new land, and till that land. That’s where you plant seeds where they will grow.

    We need a new garden. We need a new internet. The people need their voice back again instead of what’s ‘Jew-Approved.’

    The BrotherNet will make this happen.

    We need discussions taking place where the outcome is not predetermined.

    Heavily censored sub-sections of polarized forums won’t move our culture forward.

    The internet was meant to be for all, but it’s become poisoned with greed and lust for power by wicked Jews. The internet is now a tool being used to oppress us by International Jewry and set people against their own neighbors.

    We must come together, stand up, fight the good fight. We can do this together. In a new garden. In a new internet infrastructure where you have your voice again.

    We can continue on where we are meant to go. The BrotherNet is the FUTURE!

    All these social media alternatives are cries for help. Signs of a sinking ship.

    Where other prototype solutions of the dying internet have failed, The BrotherNet will succeed.

    The BrotherNet is not merely an alternative to one platform of the internet, it is instead its own CONSTRUCT where ALL types of social media, video, and article platforms can exist free of the crushing force of the Jew-approved mono-narrative.

    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE! @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

    Email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Founder: BrotherNet Project

  44. Koen August 11, 2018 @ 12:46 am

    Brittan Heller, she Bibi’s daughter (she looks like him)?

    The Jews have spread their hate for mankind to every corner of the globe, they just do not speak about it openly, which does it not make it less hateful, only more cunning and more evil.

    More on sneaky Jewish tactics, see Dr. Tony Martin’s speeches here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YvOmfeey-U
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEoBYOy3tQM&t=889s

    Btw, what historic proof exists for Hebrew ancestry? If Noah is the arch ancestor of all people alive, why don’t we call ourselves, Noahites? Why is it that we only speak of Semites? Are Jews the biggest anti-Hamites and anti-Japhetites in world history?

    I am sure Brittan Heller is a Semite (whatever that means), and therefore the ADL forbids her to fight also anti-Hamitism and anti-Japhetism, since the ADL is actually the ASL: the Anti SEMITES-defamation League (of Jewish ladies/gentlemen), and yet again, Jews hide their true intentions behind a thin layer of “objectivity”.

    Btw, Alex Jones is Jewish, for your information:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2gdkQIv3kY

  45. AJ August 11, 2018 @ 2:11 am

    Fantastic video! No one else is as good as Brother Nathanael.

    I’m not a huge of fan of Alex Jones’ style, though his website is often informative.

    There are massive lawsuits waiting to be brought against the Jew-controlled press for staging these shooting events.

    Anyone who is a leader in these movements challenging the Jewish/Zionist agendas, be it Jones or Trump or anyone else needs to be more careful how they present themselves to the public. Jones’s eccentric style and Trump’s childish obnoxiousness doesn’t help.

    Putin is much more low key and shrewd in how he communicates and hence doesn’t arouse as much opposition as he might otherwise.

    And where are America’s Christian leaders?

  46. dave August 11, 2018 @ 9:05 pm

    Eyewitness onboard boat to Gaza says Israeli forces beat passengers and stole thousands of dollars, antibiotics during raid

    https://mondoweiss.net/2018/08/eyewitness-passengers-antibiotics/

  47. benzion kook August 11, 2018 @ 10:38 pm

    israhell is a dead land.

    Know this, they will be destroyed by their own evil.

  48. Lord-Pi-314 August 12, 2018 @ 10:32 am

    @Koen

    You are absolutely right. Not all Jews are bad. And not all bad people are Jews. However, the bad Jews give all the Jews a bad name, just like the bad cops give all cops a bad name. It is said that the Zionist Talmudic type of Jews is the group who makes all their plans for subjugating the people of the world and bringing about the “New World Order”.

    Many of them are motivated by revenge for how Jews have been treated around the world. And keep in mind that there are many more Zionist Christians than there are Zionist Jews.

    They are very much involved in taking over the Middle East for the oil and other mineral reserves, not to mention the opioid poppy production. And those Zionist Christians could care less about the collateral damage inflicted on the millions of suffering people who are murdered in the illegal wars perpetrated since the false flag 911 attacks.

    As Condolezza Rice was famous for saying, “if you want to make an omelet, you have to break some eggs”. And we all know now that the omelet she was referring to translates to total control of the M. E.

    It will be very interesting to see how history plays out, as these misguided miscreants try to make a Bible prophecy self-fulfilling, with phony Jews playing the parts of Abrahams descendants, and the historical record of the actual Israelites having already broken their Covenant with the “God” who supposedly went into the Real Estate Business.

    After all, they really did blow it a long time ago when they murdered the prophets and the Son of God. And decided to do Baal Worship instead of following the 10 Commandments.

    As time goes on, more and more of Jews of good conscience will distance themselves from the bad ones, and you will know them by their fruits.

  49. robertvnik August 12, 2018 @ 1:50 pm

    Nathanael.

    You have me intrigued with this talk of BrotherNet. Intrigued becaused I love the idea and have often tough about such things but at the same time I am not computer savvy.

    One thing which I often ponder on is this; free speech via any network would mean people like Christ hating Sarah Silverstein (think that’s her name) or Christ hating Satanists etc could promote their ideas freely. Now that sounds fair enough but it also includes what many would call ’sexual deviants’ and other extremes.

    Prostitutes advertising their services! Who knows what else. Then there would be porn of course. All in the name of free speech.

    How would these things be handled? My only conclusion (I’m a bit thick tho’) is that they would have to be freely allowed. Otherwise we have censorship once again.

  50. Brother Nathanael August 12, 2018 @ 4:45 pm

    @robertvnik

    Take a look again at the Phases of The BrotherNet outlined above, especially Phase 5:

    Phase 5:

    As BrotherNet grows, a legal team will be required to manage the inevitable lawsuits surrounding hosting information that is slated for removal from the internet.

    Notes: Services can be free initially to build a user base, however, at some point charging money for VPN, physical internet access, communication, and hosting will become lucrative business ventures. Creating a financial transaction company will also yield income.

    A BrotherNet ‘Constitution’ of sorts should be drafted. It would outline censorship policies, freedom of speech, and other goals.

    SEE: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

  51. KathJuliane August 12, 2018 @ 6:23 pm

    Rolling Stone: Taibbi: Beware the Slippery Slope of Facebook Censorship

    The social network is too big and broken to properly function, and these “fixes” will only create more problems

    You may have seen a story this week detailing how Facebook shut down a series of accounts.

    As noted by Politico, Facebook claimed these accounts “sought to inflame social and political tensions in the United States, and said their activity was similar — and in some cases connected — to that of Russian accounts during the 2016 election.”

    Similar? What does “similar” mean?

    The death-pit for civil liberties is usually found in a combination of fringe/unpopular people or ideas and a national security emergency.

    This is where we are with this unsettling new confab of Facebook, Congress and the Trump administration.

    Read this jarring quote from Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) about the shutting down of the “inauthentic” accounts: “Today’s disclosure is further evidence that the Kremlin continues to exploit platforms like Facebook to sow division and spread disinformation… I also expect Facebook, along with other platform companies, will continue to identify Russian troll activity and to work with Congress…”

    This was in a story in which Facebook stated that it did not know the source of all the pages. They might be Russian, or they might just be Warner’s idea of “sowing division.” Are we comfortable with that range of possibilities? Many of the banned pages look like parodies of some paranoid bureaucrat’s idea of dangerous speech.

    A page called “Black Elevation” shows a picture of Huey Newton and offers readers a job. “Aztlan Warriors” contains a meme celebrating the likes of Geronimo and Zapata, giving thanks for their service in the “the 500 year war against colonialism.”

    And a banned “Mindful Being” page shared this, which seems culled from Jack Handey’s Deep Thoughts bit:

    “We must unlearn what we have learned because a conditioned mind cannot comprehend the infinite.”

    Facebook also wiped out a “No Unite The Right 2” page, appearing to advertise a counter-rally on the upcoming anniversary of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia.

    Facebook was “helped” in its efforts to wipe out these dangerous memes by the Atlantic Council, on whose board you’ll find confidence-inspiring names like Henry Kissinger, former CIA chief Michael Hayden, former acting CIA head Michael Morell and former Bush-era Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff. (The latter is the guy who used to bring you the insane color-coded terror threat level system.)

    These people now have their hands on what is essentially a direct lever over nationwide news distribution. It’s hard to understate the potential mischief that lurks behind this union of Internet platforms and would-be government censors.

    As noted in Rolling Stone earlier this year, 70 percent of Americans get their news from just two sources, Facebook and Google. As that number rises, the power of just a few people to decide what information does and does not reach the public will amplify significantly.

    In a way, this is the other shoe dropping after last week’s much-publicized brouhaha over Infowars lunatic Alex Jones. Jones had four videos removed from YouTube and had his Facebook page banned for 30 days, though he seemed to find a way around that more or less instantly.

    These moves were celebrated across social media, because who doesn’t hate Alex Jones?

    The complainants in the Jones case included parents of Sandy Hook victims, who have legitimate beef with Jones and his conspiratorial coverage.

    The Infowars reports asserting the grieving parents were green-screen fakes were not just demonstrably false and rightfully the subject of a defamation suit, but also seemingly crossed a separate line when they published maps and addresses of family members, who experienced threats.

    When Jones and his like-minded pals cried censorship and bias, they came across as more than a little disingenuous. After all, right-wingers have consistently argued on behalf of the speech rights of big corporations.

    Conservative justices have handed down rulings using the First Amendment to hold back regulation of big tobacco and the gun industry, and to justify unlimited campaign spending. Citizens United was a crucial moment in the degradation of the First Amendment, essentially defining corporate influence as speech.

    As many pointed out last week, the Jones ban was not a legal speech issue – not exactly, anyway. No matter how often Jones yelped about “Hitler levels of censorship,” and no matter how many rambling pages he and his minions typed up in their “emergency report” on the “deep state plan to kill the First Amendment,” it didn’t change the objectively true fact their ban was not (yet) a First Amendment issue.

    The First Amendment, after all, only addresses the government’s power to restrict speech. It doesn’t address what Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter can do as private companies, enforcing their terms of service.

    So it’s true, there was no First Amendment issue with the Jones ban. But that’s the problem.

    The pre-Internet system for dealing with defamatory and libelous speech was litigation, which was pretty effective. The standard for punishment was also very high. In the 1964 Supreme Court case New York Times v. Sullivan — the bedrock case for libel law involving a public figure — the court went out of its way to make sure that complainants needed to prove reckless or knowing disregard for fact.

    Among other things, the court worried that absent such a tough legal standard, outlets would play it too safe with speech, and “make only statements which ‘steer far wider of the unlawful zone.’”

    This mostly worked. Historically there were few analogs to Infowars that got anything like wide distribution because of the financial threat, which scared publishers most of all. In order to have power to distribute widely you needed resources, but you put those resources at risk if you defamed people.

    That all changed with digital media. Way back in 1996, when mastodons roamed the earth and people used dial-up to connect to the Internet, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act. It contained the following landmark language:

    “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

    Essentially this meant that Internet providers wouldn’t be treated like news organizations. In the eyes of the law, they were less like CBS or Random House than they were bookstores or newsstands.

    The rule allowed platforms to grow exponentially without the same fear of litigation. Companies like Facebook and Google became all-powerful media distributors, and were able to profit from InfoWars-style programs without having to be liable for them.

    This led to the flowering of so much obnoxious speech that the First Amendment acquired a reputation as a racist con, and online media distributors, instead of being sued themselves as publishers, began to be viewed as potential restorers of order, beneficent censors.

    Now, at a moment of crisis and high political tension, the public seems unable to grasp the gravity of allowing the government or anyone else to use that power.

    It is already a scandal that these de facto private media regulators have secret algorithmic processes that push down some news organizations in favor of others. Witness the complaints by outlets like Alternet, Truthdig and others that big platforms have been de-emphasizing alternative sites in the name of combating “fake news.”

    But this week’s revelation is worse. When Facebook works with the government and wannabe star-chamber organizations like the Atlantic Council to delete sites on national security grounds, using secret methodology, it opens the door to nightmare possibilities that you’d find in dystopian novels.

    The sheer market power of these companies over information flow has always been the real threat. This is why breaking them up should have long ago become an urgent national priority.

    Instead, as was obvious during the Senate hearing with Mark Zuckerberg earlier this year, politicians are more interested in using than curtailing the power of these companies. The platforms, for their part, will cave rather than be regulated. The endgame here couldn’t be clearer. This is how authoritarian marriages begin, and people should be very worried.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/facebook-censor-alex-jones-705766/

  52. benzion kook August 12, 2018 @ 7:49 pm

    @All

    Re the “situation” in Turkey: Yep, Henry Ford is right again.

  53. KathJuliane August 13, 2018 @ 10:03 am

    South Front: YouTube is Censoring SF’s New 1.5-Hour Long Video “Russian Military Campaign in Syria 2015-2018″

    YouTube is censoring SouthFront’s new 1.5-hour long video “Russian Military Campaign in Syria 2015-2018“.

    This video is a detailed summary of military and political developments in Syria since the start of the Russian military operation until now. It was released by SouthFront on August 11.

    Less than 2 hours after the release, this video was placed behind an age restriction because it allegedly includes “violent or graphic content that appears to be posted in a shocking, sensational, or disrespectful manner”.

    The age-restriction clearly impacts a possible reach of the video because it does not allow people without YouTube accounts to watch it.

    More: https://southfront.org/youtube-is-censoring-sfs-new-1-5-hour-long-video-russian-military-campaign-in-syria-2015-2018/

  54. KathJuliane August 13, 2018 @ 10:15 am

    OffGuardian: The goal of propaganda is a population that polices itself…

    …or why the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn are not what they seem…

    MarkGB

    Propaganda has reached its zenith when each member of the target population thinks the same; when they are afraid to think differently.

    At this point ‘leadership’ may commit whatever atrocities it sees fit…in the certainty that the population will either not ‘see’ it, or will view the expression of criticism as a more heinous crime than the act being observed.

    This is achieved through cementing a ‘false equivalence’ in the mind of the group. Such a false equivalence is being cemented in the UK right now – the idea that criticism of Israel’s persecution of Palestinians is an act of anti-Semitism.

    The propagandist seeks to bend the ‘group mind’. Thoughts and actions consistent with the ‘narrative’ are deemed to be socially acceptable & politically correct…ones that challenge it are regarded as socially UN-acceptable & politically IN-correct.

    Overtime this is reinforced through a dynamic that exists within every human grouping, and many species of mammal – fear of disapproval. Ergo, the propagandist is employing a form of ‘crowd control’.

    When the fear of disapproval becomes so strong that one’s sense of belonging, or even physical survival, depend on adherence to the narrative…when failure to comply with it attracts immediate rebuke from other members of the group…then the population can be said to be policing itself.

    That is how ‘cults’ function, and more frequently than you might imagine…it’s how intelligence agencies and other governmental figures attempt to work through the media.

    This is what Orwell warned of in the dystopia of ‘1984’. The Party had achieved what we might call a ‘maintenance state’ for the narrative – society was policing itself.

    For example, in Oceania, children were taught to report their parents to the ‘Thought Police’ if they demonstrated any sign of disloyalty to The Party. Disloyalty was considered a ‘thought crime’:

    “Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them.

    “There is almost no kind of outrage – torture, imprisonment without trial, assassination, the bombing of civilians – which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by ‘our’ side.

    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them” — George Orwell, 1984

    This process is happening now. The false equivalence of ‘criticism of Israel’ with ‘anti-Semitism’ is being inculcated into society in general, into the Labour Party in particular, and in its sharpest manifestation, into the smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn.

    As you will already be aware (unless you’ve been trapped behind the fridge for several weeks) Corbyn is the target of a virulent campaign from a number of different directions, which have made ‘common cause’ on the accusation of anti-Semitism.

    Here, for example, are three major Jewish Newspapers, competitors of each other, who made the extraordinary decision to agree a common headline and verdict on ‘Corbyn’s Labour Party’….

    The mainstream media has not missed any opportunity to bash Corbyn either. Here’s a relatively mild headline from the Sun, who selected a comment from one of Corbyn’s backbenchers, Wes Streeting….

    There is no way that Jeremy Corbyn or the Labour Party will ever get a ‘fair crack of the whip’ on this issue.

    The narrative requires that Corbyn’s support for Palestinians goes away…if you are entertaining the possibility that there is any place for ‘rational argument’ or ‘objective reporting’ from or with the people driving this narrative…you are deluding yourself.

    This is Propaganda…this is how it’s supposed to work.

    And it is working…have you noticed how the media is utterly obsessed with talking about Corbyn’s ‘anti-Semitism’…at the expense of the underlying issue he calls attention to – Israel’s abuse of the Palestinian people?

    What then, is a person to do?

    The solution to this is not quick, and it’s not easy. However, one action that any human being can take, is to stay alert to the meaningof words and how they are structured.

    If the communication is verbal, also to the body language and vocal tonalities.Pay attention to what is really being said…and also notice what is notbeing said or skirted around…and refuse to sacrifice your truth for an easier life.

    Do not let the false equivalence stand. As Gandalf said to the Balrog on the bridge at Khazad Dum…”You shall not pass”.

    Complete article: https://off-guardian.org/2018/08/13/the-goal-of-propaganda-is-a-population-that-polices-itself/

  55. KathJuliane August 13, 2018 @ 11:04 am

    Ron Paul Liberty Report: Why Does Facebook Use NATO To Help Censor Users?

    Facebook has “hired” the Atlantic Council - a NATO, US government, and foreign funded “think tank” to determine whether posts or members are authentic or whether they are “agents of a foreign power.”

    How is it possible that US government’s directly funded entities are collaborating with corporations to decide what speech is to be prohibited?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTSU7ISg3W0&feature=em-uploademail

    ~~~*~~~

    What’s next in this “Russiagate” Delusion? Black Marias of the NewThink Police and a commissar’s knock on the door in the middle of the night?

  56. Joe Cortina August 13, 2018 @ 2:44 pm

    Greetings to Brother Nate and all the RJN viewers.

    After years and years of observing the offensive stupidity of the Average merkan moron ( useful idiots) I feel compelled to suggest a new topic to be considered by you.

    This stupidity of the “ANTI-SEMITIC” mantra has got to stop. I personally interviewed dozens of adult, apparently educated, citizens and was shocked to discover the levels of criminal ignorance. I asked an honest simple question which was NEVER answered correctly!

    “WHAT DOES THE TERM ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’ MEAN, and what defines a SEMITE? The level of ignorance was beyond stupid — it was actually offensive.

    Correct answer: An Anti-Semite is a person who has an irrational hatred of all Semitic people. A Semitic person is defined by their language. A Semite speaks a Semitic tongue.

    In ancient times there were many Semitic tribes on Earth. Today there are still several cultures who are technically Semitic - so-defined ONLY by their native tongue and absolutely nothing to do with their race or physical appearance religion or any other identity.

    So if you are anti-Semitic it means you hate a group of people that speak one of the current dozen or so Semitic langues. The largest and most prominent of these being what we tern loosely - ‘Arab’ people. The Jews speak a Semitic language ( Hebrew) and are therefore a Semitic people. Numerically - the Jew comprises only less than ONE PERCENT of the total world population of Semitic people.

    Ironically - the ONLY truly Semitic people on Earth are the Jews themselves. They intensly hate almost all ‘Arab’ people for no other reason than the fact that they are Arabs. Arab people have been terribly abused tortured beaten and murdered by the Jews. So in any event, the Arab people who have suffered under Jew sadism and terrorism have every CAUSE and every REASON to hate Jews.

    FACTS REGARDING the stupidity of this deceitful excuse for hatred.

    (1) Christ was a Semite ( His language was Aramaic and Hebrew - Semitic tongues).

    (2) Virtually ALL Arabs are Semitic people. So according to established facts, the only reason an ‘ANTI-SEMITE’ would hate these people is their LANGUAGE. According to Jews, if you are an ‘ANTI-SEMITE’ you would of course also hate our Lord.

    (3) If you are an ‘ANTI-SEMITE’ according to the Jew - your hated for him is based only on the fact that he speaks a certain language, and not that the Jews have been for centuries — liars, murderers, cheats, frauds, homosexual perverts, pedophiles, blasphemers, Christ haters, Satan worshipers, ORGAN thieves, SLAVERS, terrorists, mass murderers, war mongers, racists and perpetrators of ALL forms of greed and evil.

    (4) According to the ‘logic’ of the Jew, even if you claim to worship Christ and you hate Jews for their evil, you also, by their reasoning, must hate Jesus!

    (5) if you are Lebanese, Syrian, or Iranian or Iraqi and slandered by Jews as an ‘ANTI_SEMITE’ you must by this same reasoning also hate your mother, your father, your children and EVERY HUMAN Being ON EARTH who speak a Semitic language!

    (6) anyone that promotes this Jew deception and slander is either VERY VERY STUPID or VERY VERY EVIL - there is no middle road.

    I recently watched an interview between Press figure Helen Thomas who is a Semite of Lebanese extraction, and some mindless degenerate Jew-worshiping degenerate twit paid to mock slander and discredit her.

    The Jew-loving TV scum then asked Ms. Thomas if she was an ‘ANTI-SEMITE’. Ms Thomas then calmly handled the verbal assault on her character by stating: “OF COURSE NOT - HOW COULD I BE? I AM A SEMITE!” What a perfect put down to this scumbag filth who attempted to slander her.

    We would all like to see a program dedicated exclusively to exposing the insultingly stupid Jew mantra of deception by making our useful idiots believe such a distorted filthy Jew lie — ESPECIALLY when the ONLY ETHNICITY ON EARTH THAT is ACTUALLY and FACTUALLY ANTI-SEMITES ARE THE EVIL JEW THEMSELVES.

    I don’t know about everyone else, but I am about done with Jew lies, Jew slander, and Jew evil. This Jew-invented nonsense is an insult to the intelligence of us ALL. IT HAS TO STOP!

    Natananael, please consider a program dedicate to putting this offensive insult. I have done all the homework on stats and facts regarding the TRUE nature of this overly abused term and would gladly assist in setting the record STRAIGHT for ALL to see. It is a marvelous opportunity to put another nail in the vampire’s coffin.

    I am an ANTI-JEW BASTARD and have never actually met any Gentile who is ‘ANTI-SEMITIC’!

    LET’S TOGETHER - STOP THIS JEW DECEIT!

  57. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 5:06 pm

    GAB Seeks NEW Hosting Infrastructure

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/08/10/hate-speech-crackdown-spreads-behind-the-scenes-tech/?utm_term=.3823a29d137b

  58. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 5:38 pm

    The Mossad (JEWS with NUKES) OWNS Google & YouTube @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1296

  59. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 5:39 pm

    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

  60. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 5:56 pm

    Special Thanks To:

    “Keep Up The Good Work!”

    God BLESS You Forever!

    I’m in this think for KEEPS. +BN

  61. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 5:59 pm

    From Patrick Little on GAB:

    Patrick little @Patrick_little PRO
    4 days ago
    I’ll delete the posts, but this is a violation of our rights as Americans.

    Having to self sensor on @gab for this most likely means the vendors and service providers that gab depends on will force ever more censorship.

    Me self censoring these two posts solves no problem in the end.

    I may be in the wrong, deleting these posts, but I am making a snap judgement call. @a , we will have no rights until the jews are expelled

    https://gab.ai/Patrick_little/posts/31260008

  62. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 6:00 pm

    Here’s a comment from Patrick Little’s GAB channel that relates to my BrotherNet Project.

    https://gab.ai/Patrick_little/posts/31260008

    We see that to have true free speech we need “alt infrastructure” all the way down. Including:
    1. Hosting companies capable of handling very large clients with videos.
    2. DDOS protection companies.
    3. Domain name servers.
    4. Payment processors.
    5. Banks.
    All located in a country whose government doesn’t give a sh#t what people say and can’t be pressured by other countries.

  63. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 6:02 pm

    AN IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

  64. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 7:07 pm

    BrotherNet Is A Comprehensive Solution
    To Jew Censorship

    *Rolling back the oppression of free speech and free commerce on the internet by Jewry*

    Phase 1A:
    The BrotherNet virtual private network, or VPN service, will provide access to the local infrastructure of the BrotherNet as well as access to the rest of the internet.

    This VPN would allow anyone with an internet connection to access the BrotherNet.

    Phase 1B:
    BrotherNet Archival Servers will manage both local websites (accessible only from within the BrotherNet network) as well as external websites that are on the conventional internet.

    BrotherNet users can flag a website or video that they think has a high likelihood of being censored and the BN Archival Servers will make a local copy permanently accessible to anyone on the BrotherNet.

    When content is inevitably censored from the internet, the BrotherNet servers will first try and load the deleted content. When the page doesn’t load from the internet, the page will be loaded anyway but from the BN Archival Servers along with a small notification at the top of the page, indicating that the page is only accessible to those on the BrotherNet.

    Phase 2:
    It will also be necessary to create an independent communication medium for phone & email. This can be done at the end of Phase 1, and can be expanded during Phase 3.

    Phase 3:
    As BrotherNet grows in size and popularity, access may be restricted to the BrotherNet servers on some ISPs. BrotherNet must then become its own ISP, providing direct physical access to the BrotherNet via cell towers, or internet cables.

    Internet access will still be possible through the BrotherNet, and censored content supplemented by the BN Archival Servers.

    Eventually, it may also be necessary to create a parallel internet backbone depending on funding and level of censorship.

    Phase 4:
    A financial transaction system will ultimately be necessary, providing access to funding and payment transfers between BrotherNet users.

    Phase 5:
    As BrotherNet grows, a legal team will be required to manage the inevitable lawsuits surrounding hosting information that is slated for removal from the internet.

    Notes: Services can be free initially to build a user base, however, at some point charging money for VPN, physical internet access, communication, and hosting will become lucrative business ventures. Creating a financial transaction company will also yield income.

    A BrotherNet ‘Constitution’ of sorts should be drafted. It would outline censorship policies, freedom of speech, and other goals.

    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE!
    Email me:

    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  65. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 7:08 pm

    AN IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME! @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2288414

  66. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 7:41 pm

    WE DO NOT NEED another Facebook. Nor another Youtube.

    Nor gab.ai, nor now erased vid.me, and disappeared pew.tube.

    We need a whole new construct!

    If your garden is riddled with pests, weeds, the ground is infertile; you don’t take your healthy seeds and plant them there. You find new land, and till that land. That’s where you plant seeds where they will grow.

    We need a new garden. We need a new internet. The people need their voice back again instead of what’s ‘Jew-Approved.’

    The BrotherNet will make this happen.

    We need discussions taking place where the outcome is not predetermined.

    Heavily censored sub-sections of polarized forums won’t move our culture forward.

    The internet was meant to be for all, but it’s become poisoned with greed and lust for power by wicked Jews. The internet is now a tool being used to oppress us by International Jewry and set people against their own neighbors.

    We must come together, stand up, fight the good fight. We can do this together. In a new garden. In a new internet infrastructure where you have your voice again.

    We can continue on where we are meant to go. The BrotherNet is the FUTURE!

    All these social media alternatives are cries for help. Signs of a sinking ship.

    Where other prototype solutions of the dying internet have failed, The BrotherNet will succeed.

    The BrotherNet is not merely an alternative to one platform of the internet, it is instead its own CONSTRUCT where ALL types of social media, video, and article platforms can exist free of the crushing force of the Jew-approved mono-narrative.

    NEED FUNDING, IT’s DOABLE! @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2286365

    Email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Founder: BrotherNet Project

  67. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 7:42 pm

    Why The BrotherNet

    The BrotherNet is a long term true Internet and digital infrastructure alternative,
    and ultimately will be an Internet replacement.

    The current Internet was built on the infrastructure of telephone lines, coax cable, and fiber communication lines intended for anything but what the Internet has evolved to today.

    Coax cable, originally intended for TV was found to be effective for delivering Internet. Eventually, people stopped using coax for TV and would get TV through their Internet connection in the form of streaming.

    This is the goal of The BrotherNet. At first, the Internet will be the primary network used to grow The BrotherNet, but eventually people will primarily access what is left of the Internet through the much bigger and pervasive BrotherNet.

    The current Internet was designed to allow free flow of communication and information between people. That free flow of information is what expanded the Internet like nothing we’ve ever seen.

    However, the Internet has become poisoned with Jew censors. Jew Censors who want to stop exactly what made the Internet thrive.

    BrotherNet is the preemptive solution to a sinking ship. We could wait until the Internet cannibalizes itself into nothing more than an interactive CNN ad on endless repeat…or we could now begin construction on what will be the next big Internet transitional revolution.
    ——————————————————-
    If you’re willing to help with FUNDING, please email me:
    bronathanael[at](yahoo){dot}[com]
    Mail:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation; POB 547; Priest River ID 83856

  68. Greg Groebner August 13, 2018 @ 9:03 pm

    Well, don’t let anyone ever say that Brother Nathanael doesn’t think big!

    This BrotherNet idea is more than a little intriguing. As bold and as daunting as are these points (especially #’s 3 and 4 — physical and financial infrastructure), it’s a thing of which someone on “our side” needs to sit down and make at least a contingency plan.

    Personally, I think the financial infrastructure Phase 4 would need to be pushed up the chain all the way to the slot of Phase 2, in spite of the great difficulties this would entail. Having control of a local or niche currency can help finance the building of the physical infrastructure in later phases.

    Having a financial system in place with financial participation would also be a way to measure interest level in the BrotherNet, and thus would provide a way to prioritize where the physical infrastructures would first be built.

    A local group are having a meeting at the end of this week, and almost these same topics are on my side agenda. One addition on my agenda notes is a killer social app that ties into a “social credit” system; although I can’t figure out a good way to do this without the thing becoming an automated Orwellian nightmare, or something along the lines of the Chinese experiments in this.

    The kinds of censorship needed is where a constitution of rights (and the duties from which rights have their origin) would be necessary, as Brother Nathanael notes above.

    However, to actually implement this with software algorithms would be a heavy and never-ending project, to prevent it from becoming an all-seeing eye. (I suppose I could just copy what Google and Facebook and Youtube etc are doing, and just reverse the results.)

    I’m thinking there would need to be some sort of hierarchical “reputation”/”legitimate authority” streamlining mechanism coupled with the openness-but- inefficiencies of something like a block-chained self-auditing.

    Moreover, on Phase 4, you might be surprised in not needing to actually build all of the physical telecommunications infrastructure, as small Internet operators might be ready to jump on board.

    20 years ago, we ran a 60×60 mile wireless Internet system via a couple towers and 3 grain elevators, and would have been interested in a proposal such as the BrotherNet if the stranglehold existed then as it is beginning to exist today.

    Greg Groeber
    Committee For Mass Survival @
    http://www.masssurvival.org/

  69. Brother Nathanael August 13, 2018 @ 11:49 pm

    @Greg Groebner

    Thank you for your valuable feedback, dear Greg. You’re right; financial infrastructure may need to come sooner rather than later for The BrotherNet.

    The ‘Phases’ are categorizations of tasks and are not necessarily restricted to chronological order. Many of the phases can be tackled concurrently with proper funding and observed demand.

    For example, as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google continue weaponizing their cloud services, it may make financial and logistical sense to begin offering hybrid cloud services that serve to both The BrotherNet as well as the rest of the internet.

    Ultimately these cloud services will become strongholds of The BrotherNet, but in the interim, can protect what’s left of free speech on the internet.

    Financial services would be very similar. It is likely demand will grow exponentially–even before proper infrastructure and backup servers of The BrotherNet are deployed–for a way to move money for those not touting the proper ‘narrative.’

    I would also agree with you that most approaches to social credit will have disastrous results. China is pioneering a form of social credit mixed with their video surveillance and smartphone monitoring. We’ll see how that goes…

    Incorporating smaller ISPs would be a great option too. There are many small ISPs that would be looking for an added edge against larger name-brand ISPs. As smaller ISPs grow and cut into larger ISP profits, it’s possible even larger ISPs may reluctantly have to start offering access to The BrotherNet. But that’s a little ways down the line.

    Everywhere on the internet you see social media clones, mail clones, this clone, that clone, decentralized video platforms, and so on. Every corner of the internet is begging for a new version of whatever has gone wrong there…

    The fact is… it’s ALL gone wrong. Give the Jew an inch he’ll take the whole thing and POISON it all. All censorship is in the hands of free-speech hating Jews. Not that they care about ‘hate’ toward anyone else, they simply use ‘hate protections’ as a shield for their own criminality.

    That’s why we need so much more than just another ‘better’ app. We need a whole new internet. We NEED The BrotherNet.

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Founder of The BrotherNet Project

  70. KathJuliane August 14, 2018 @ 9:15 am

    CNET: Google is tracking Android phone location history even when the feature is disabled

    Your account’s “Web and App Activity” tracking is the real culprit.

    A graduate researcher at UC Berkeley discovered evidence that her Android phone was tracking her movements even with location history disabled, according to a report by the Associated Press, which consulted with researchers at Princeton to confirm the existence of the issue.

    Berkeley researcher K. Shankari said in a blog on a UC Berkeley website that her phone asked her to rate a recent shopping trip, despite the Location History function being disabled.

    Shankari studies commuting patterns at the university, which probably positioned her to be more aware of unusual app behavior.

    She does not mention using Google Pay to conduct any store transactions, which leaves another Google service as the likely culprit.

    Shankari hones in on Google Maps because of two notifications from that app, inviting to rate her visits (with screenshots in her blog to prove it).

    She also demonstrates that all location tracking functions are disabled on her device and in her Google account.

    Speaking to the Associated Press, Google confirmed that this behavior exists and is in fact intentional, adding, “There are a number of different ways that Google may use location to improve people’s experience, including: Location History, Web and App Activity, and through device-level Location Services.

    “We provide clear descriptions of these tools, and robust controls so people can turn them on or off, and delete their histories at any time.”

    The AP, together with Princeton, inferred correctly that “Web and App Activity” was the source of the tracking issue. When that is disabled, location tracking is legitimately turned off for your Google account.

    Unfortunately, this is kind of a nuclear option, because it also applies to all of your Google search engine activity and Google Assistant interactions.

    So when you toggle it off, Google warns you that this will make the Assistant less effective, as it relies on that data to personalize your experience.

    The company’s Google Home devices — and Lenovo’s recently launched Smart Display that competes with the Echo Show — are both driven by conversations with the Assistant, so your experiences there will also be impacted.

    However, for users of Android devices who do not want to be monitored by Google services, disabling Web and App Activity for your account may be the only way to fully disable the company’s location tracking.

    If you are logged into your account, you can go to this page and shut down the function, where you’ll also find a link at the bottom to see your other activity controls, and tools to delete your previously recorded history data.

    The takeaways

    1) Google can record the location history of your Android device even if you have all location tracking functions disabled.

    To fully prohibit location tracking, you must also disable the Web and App Activity setting for your Google Account.

    [Go to CNET for the embedded link that will take you to the Google/Chrome Web and App Activity page]

    2) Google is aware of this and indicates that these services are operating as intended.

    https://download.cnet.com/blog/download-blog/google-is-tracking-android-phone-location-history-even-when-the-feature-is-disabled/

  71. Citizenfitz August 14, 2018 @ 10:25 am

    There’s an air of desperation in these censorship tactics.

    Too many cracks now in the Jews’ “hate dam” for them to plug them all.

    Eventually the dam will burst - and as always the little Jews will pay the butcher’s bill for the sins of the big Jews.

  72. james kenny August 14, 2018 @ 11:16 am

    Ty for the notice.

    Develop your own facebook-like network (BrotherNet project) if possible.

    Get support from IHR (Institute of Historic Review) and other truth web sites.

    Brother Nathanael’s message is needed.

    I don’t understand all this other computer network, web, browsers, etc. U S GOV will try to stop it.

  73. Brother Nathanael August 14, 2018 @ 11:46 am

    @james kenny

    You wrote: “U S GOV will try to stop your BrotherNet.”

    I write back: No way. We have been in contact with some Internet lawyers who are Constitutional experts.

    There are LAWS on the books that a team of lawyers, once we get The BrotherNet off the ground, who know how to deal with government impediments.

    And besides, China, Russia, and other countries who are OUTSIDE the JEW-controlled orbit have internet connections, and as I have learned from my sources abroad, there are efforts already in the works to establish alternate internet networks by other countries.

    The BrotherNet can connect up to these easily, that is, if needed.

    +Brother Nathanael
    Founder: The BrotherNet Project @
    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1308#comment-2288417

  74. KathJuliane August 14, 2018 @ 12:33 pm

    Dmitri Orlov moved to the US as a child, and lives in the Boston area.

    He is best known for his 2011 book comparing Soviet and American collapse (he thinks America’s will be worse).

    ~~~*~~~

    ClubOrlov.com (Excerpts) Censoring Alex Jones:

    Something happened recently that made me feel like a bit of an endangered species.

    A set of transnational internet companies, including Google, Facebook, Apple and several others, all synchronously removed content belonging to infowars.com, which is run by Alex Jones.

    Such synchronicity is a sure sign of conspiracy—something that Alex Jones harps on a lot.

    I once appeared on a radio show run by Alex Jones, and he did manage to boil down what I had to say to “the USA is going to collapse like the USSR did,” which is pretty good, considering how poorly we managed to connect, having so little in common.

    He is a conservative and a libertarian whereas I think that conservatives don’t exist in the US.

    There is also the mismatch of genre between Jones and me. I am first of all an experimenter and an essayist, and to me personal experience and literary form are vitally important, while Jones is light on research and happy to work with hearsay, and is rather hackneyed and repetitive, but has the right instincts for a rabble-rouser.

    He harkens from a long American tradition of itinerant preachers spouting jeremiads, thumping the Bible and hurling fire and brimstone.

    His content is secular, but his rhetorical techniques are revivalist. He is preachy, screechy and emotional.

    There is some carnival cryer in his cultural makeup as well, and he is not above peddling some survivalist/prepper snake oil.

    That said, we share certain important similarities. Neither of us is part of the official narrative that is endlessly being hammered home by US mass media with increasingly poor results.

    Thinking Americans are just not gullible enough any more. Jones has exploited this gullibility shortfall in the general public for all it’s worth by going after every conspiracy theory out there, while I am just like you—gullible.

    Sure, a few Arab tourists armed with box cutters destroyed three steel skyscrapers by flying two aluminum planes into them. Do your own math, but that’s just 2/3 of a plane per skyscraper—ought to be enough, right?

    Jet fuel, which burns at 800° to 1500°F, melted steel columns. (Steel melts at 2750°F.) Two aluminum cans packed with kerosene, meat and luggage destroyed three steel structures.

    I find this explanation perfectly satisfactory; do you?

    If you need to know more, it’s easy to find out, but don’t wait on me because, being so gullible, I am perfectly satisfied.

    Jones and I are also different in that he is hugely popular whereas I am popular enough for me and generally lacking in worldly ambition.

    I enjoy writing, my readers enjoy what I write, and everyone is happy except the kids, because while I am writing I am not playing with them. But Jones is becoming huge—popular enough to displace mass media, which is continuously losing mind share.

    In part, that is its own fault: how long do they think they can they go on flogging the dead horses of “Russian collusion” and “Russian meddling” before people start shaking their heads and walking away?

    In part, the verbal diarrhea that we hear on CNN or read on nytimes.com is intended as a smokescreen because the truth has become toxic to the interests of those who are in charge mass media in the US.

    I will delve into this subject further on Thursday.

    The political decision to censor Jones was a sign of desperation: the verbal diarrhea is not working, and so it’s time for Plan B, which is simply to scream “Shut up!” as loudly as possible.

    Jones did not, as far as anyone can tell, violate the terms of use of any of these internet services, yet they shut him down.

    In the public discussions that preceded this event, including in the US Congress, terms such as “hate speech” and “inciting violence” were thrown about.

    These terms are defined sufficiently vaguely to make them useful for arbitrarily throwing at one’s enemies while one’s friends are granted full immunity, all in an entirely context-free, fact-free manner.

    For example, two years ago on PBS the following exchange took place between the former acting CIA director Michael Morell and Charlie Rose:

    Morell: “We need to make the Russians pay a price in Syria.”
    Rose: “We make them pay the price by killing Russians?”
    Morell: “Yeah.”

    The context and the facts are: the Russians were in Syria by official invitation from the internationally recognized Syrian government to defeat terrorists and foreign mercenaries and to reestablish Syria’s control over its sovereign territory.

    The US forces weren’t doing much of anything helpful in Syria, but whatever it was, it was illegal: they were an invading force. And here is Morrell proposing that we kill Russian troops who are fighting terrorists, just to send a message.

    If that’s not “inciting violence,” it is really difficult to imagine what would be. And yet a full two years after this outrage PBS remains on the air; what gives?

    Spurious claims of “hate speech” and “inciting violence” aside, what happened is that an order to shut down Jones was issued from Washington, DC.

    In response an impressively large group of transnational internet companies saluted and marched off to carry out the order, thereby making it perfectly obvious who they work for. And that is likely to become a big problem for them.

    First, these transnational companies are allowed to provide services around the world based on international law.

    Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defends the right to freedom of opinion and expression: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

    Jones should sue the US and the companies that censored him in the European Court of Human rights in Strasbourg, France and seek redress both against entities within the US government which issued the illegal order (to be ferreted out in the course of discovery) and against the transnational companies that carried it out.

    Second, these transnational companies operate around the world based on local law which in many cases prevents them from acting as agents of foreign governments without first registering as such.

    If Google and Facebook execute orders issued by the US government, then they are acting not as businesses but as clandestine representatives of a foreign power.

    Being recognized as such would significantly curtail these companies’ international reach, growth potential and valuations.

    And since Google, Facebook and Apple are public companies committed to the pursuit of shareholder value, it would be time for their shareholders to get involved and replace the management teams.

    After all, what would be more profitable for them: illegally conspiring with the US government while becoming pariahs and losing the world market, or scrupulously maintaining arm’s-length relationships with all governments while working to uphold international law?

    There is still the opportunity for them to defuse the whole situation: call it a mistake, restore the services, compensate Jones for lost revenue and promise to never do it again.

    http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2018/08/censoring-alex-jones.html

  75. Brother Nathanael August 14, 2018 @ 12:53 pm

    Working on NEW Vid. Hope to post tonight, latest, tomorrow…Lord willing.

    Stay tuned. +bn

    PS Special thanks to “Keep Up The Good Work”

  76. KathJuliane August 14, 2018 @ 12:56 pm

    The Future in Retrospect — US Department of State Global Engagement Center, originally established by President Obama’s fiat Executive Order in early 2016.

    I’m pondering this under-publicized fact at the same time finding out that Trump has signed the sprawling and bloated $716 billion defense bill named for John McCain, the largest defense bill in 30 years, and is ramping up war with Iran.

    “The Global Engagement Center is charged with leading the U.S. government’s efforts to counter propaganda and disinformation from international terrorist organizations and foreign countries.

    The Secretary of State established the Global Engagement Center (GEC) in April 2016 pursuant to Executive Order 13721.

    The GEC was subsequently codified into law by Congress in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which defined its mission as being to “lead, synchronize, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining United States national security interests.”

    https://www.state.gov/r/gec/

    ~~~*~~~

    Common Dreams
    Monday, December 26, 2016

    Under Cover of Christmas, Obama Establishes Controversial Anti-Propaganda Agency

    In the final hours before the Christmas holiday weekend, U.S. President Barack Obama on Friday quietly signed the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law—and buried within the $619 billion military budget (pdf) is a controversial provision that establishes a national anti-propaganda center that critics warn could be dangerous for press freedoms.

    The Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act, introduced by Republican Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, establishes the Global Engagement Center under the State Department which coordinates efforts to “recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining United Sates national security interests.”

    Further, the law authorizes grants to non-governmental agencies to help “collect and store examples in print, online, and social media, disinformation, misinformation, and propaganda” directed at the U.S. and its allies, as well as “counter efforts by foreign entities to use disinformation, misinformation, and propaganda to influence the policies and social and political stability” of the U.S. and allied nations.

    The head of the center will be appointed by the president, which likely means the first director will be chosen by President-elect Donald Trump.

    The new law comes weeks before the New York billionaire assumes the presidency, amid national outrage over the spread of fake news and what many say is foreign interference in the election, both which are accused of enabling Trump’s victory.

    Those combined forces have already contributed to the overt policing of media critical of U.S. foreign policy, such as the problematic “fake news blacklist” recently disseminated by the Washington Post.

    And for those paying attention over the holiday weekend, the creation of the a new information agency under the Propaganda Act appears to be another worrisome development.

    Michael Salamone

    @MichaelSalamone
    I hate to get your tinsel in a tangle, but Obama signed NDAA, allowing government to place propaganda while labeling anti-US news as such.

    1:24 PM - Dec 24, 2016

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/12/26/under-cover-christmas-obama-establishes-controversial-anti-propaganda-agency

    —–

    Congressional Research Service

    CRS Insight

    Global Engagement Center: Background and Issues
    August 4, 2017 (IN10744)

    PDF online at FAS: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IN10744.pdf

  77. The Leftist warrior. August 14, 2018 @ 3:28 pm

    What a bunch of garbage, allowing Alex Jones is like allowing pedophiles to have their pages….

    So,if some gays are banned from bakeries or hardware stores, the right applauds but if big companies like FB ban a conspiracy buffoon, then there is panic!?

    Alex Jones success is not based on “conspiracies” but on being a frenetic rabid anti-immigrant and pro-gun.

    And he is a danger, the idiot could destroy companies that sell juiceboxes because the Piglet from Central Texas claims that Juiceboxes turn you gay, and that will put fear on people.

    I am glad the pig was banned.

  78. KathJuliane August 14, 2018 @ 4:15 pm

    The Department of State Global Engagement Center represents the marriage of the USG with the leading pink- and red-diapered social media techno-chekists of the mega-corporate ‘Surveillance Valley’ Commissariat for Internal Affairs.

    ‘Surveillance Valley’ is comes from the title of a book - Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet, but it is certainly appropriate now.

    In the meantime, The Australian reported under the headline ‘Work with Us or Die: Zuckerberg:

    “A senior Facebook executive has privately admitted Mark Zuckerberg “doesn’t care” about publishers and warned that if they did not work with the social media giant, ‘I’ll be holding your hands with your dying business like in a ­hospice’”

    https://twitter.com/australian/status/1028767394796265472

    Facebook is vehemently denying this, at the same time somehow asserting it was taken out of context, but 5 people at this private meeting confirm what Campbell Brown, the Facebook exec had said.

    Anyway, the Global Engagement Center answers to the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, currently Heather Nauert in an acting capacity, who is also the official Department of State spokeswoman.

    The GEC is currently led by Acting Coordinator Daniel Kimmage, by all photo appearances a Jew, perhaps of Irish Jewish ancestry, having as surname the placename of Kimmage, now a southern suburb of Dublin.

    Kimmage is a career federal employee, having served in both DHS and the State Department since 2013, originally as Principal Deputy Coordinator, Center on Strategic Counterterrorism.

    ~~~*~~~

    From the US Department of State webpage:

    The Global Engagement Center is charged with leading the U.S. government’s efforts to counter propaganda and disinformation from international terrorist organizations and foreign countries.

    The Secretary of State established the Global Engagement Center (GEC) in April 2016 pursuant to Executive Order 13721.

    The GEC was subsequently codified into law by Congress in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which defined its mission as being to “lead, synchronize, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining United States national security interests.”

    The GEC operates as a forward-looking, innovative organization that can shift focus quickly to remain responsive to agile adversaries.

    The GEC leverages data science, cutting-edge advertising technologies, and top talent from the private sector. With detailees from across the interagency, the GEC coordinates messaging efforts to ensure they are streamlined and to eliminate duplication.

    The GEC plays a key role in the U.S. government’s strategy to defeat terrorist organizations and disrupt their ability to recruit new followers.

    The GEC approaches the task of undermining terrorist ideology with the understanding that the people and groups closest to the battlefield of narratives are the most effective in countering them.

    The FY 2017 NDAA expanded the GEC’s mission to include countering the adverse effects of state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation. The GEC is currently consulting widely within the U.S. government, with allied governments, non-governmental organizations, and civil society, as well as with private-sector experts about best practices in confronting state-sponsored propaganda and disinformation.

    The 2017 NDAA also provided legal authorities, including a Privacy Act authorization, which will permit the GEC to meet the rising demand from the interagency and international partners for data analytics.

    The NDAA also expanded the range of support that the GEC could provide to foreign non-governmental organizations, think tanks, and other organizations.

    Organization

    The work of the GEC is focused around four core areas: science and technology, interagency engagement, partner engagement, and content production.

    – Science & Technology: The GEC’s Science & Technology team is charged with enabling the U.S. government and its [think tank & corporate contractor] partners to increase the reach and effectiveness of their communications.

    The team conducts research on target audiences and utilizes data science techniques to measure the effectiveness of our efforts. Among other techniques, the Science & Technology team performs A/B testing and multivariate analysis to measure the effectiveness of our content distribution.

    The GEC utilizes hypothesis-driven experimentation and applies a “create-measure-learn” approach to its activities to maximize effectiveness.

    – Interagency Engagement: The GEC liaises regularly across the interagency and coordinates closely with the relevant national security departments and agencies to identify efficiencies and opportunities in the messaging and partnership space.

    The GEC’s staff includes detailees from throughout the interagency, including the Department of Defense, Intelligence Community, United States Agency for International Development, and Broadcasting Board of Governors.

    – Partner Engagement: One of the GEC’s overarching strategies is to identify, cultivate, and expand a global network of partners whose voices resonate with individuals most vulnerable to harmful propaganda.

    These partners work tirelessly to drive a wedge between susceptible audiences and those nations, groups, and terrorists seeking to influence them.

    The GEC conducts on-the-ground training sessions to enable these partners to develop their own content and disseminate it through their distribution networks. The GEC also leverages rigorous research and data science to improve tactics and techniques and inspire innovation.

    – Content Production: The GEC and its partners have established programming across multiple platforms, including social media, satellite television, radio, film, and print.

    This programming is conducted in various languages, including Arabic, Urdu, Somali, and French. These platforms allow the U.S. government and its partners to inject factual content about terrorist organizations into the information space to counter recruitment and radicalization to violence.

    They also allow us to develop and disseminate messaging on effective themes, such as exposing ISIS’s financial and governance failures; its violence against women, children, and religious minorities; and its ongoing territorial losses.

    The GEC is currently led by Acting Coordinator Daniel Kimmage.
    https://www.state.gov/r/gec/

    The ‘Surveillance Valley’ Commissariat for Internal Affairs, much of it in the hands of Silicon Valley Jews with very close ties to Israel, is entirely hooked into this GEC.

    Back in May, Acting Undersecretary Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Heather Nauert, married to Goldman Sachs managing director Scott Norby, and who wholeheartedly supports US-backed Saudi Arabia’s slaughter of Yemenis, airstrikes on school buses full of children, crowds of people at weddings and funerals, and so forth, hosted the first of the State Department’s GEC Technological Series.

    “This initiative will convene some of the country’s best technologists, academics, and civil society advocacy groups on a regular basis to identify technological solutions and to encourage stronger public-private partnerships in the fight against foreign propaganda and disinformation.”

    You can bet that all of the majors of the corporate Surveillance Valley was there.

    https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2018/05/281796.htm

    There’s quite a suspicious, cynical part of me that suspects that Alex Jones, who does have an interesting family CIA and “army special forces” background that he’s talked about over the years, may have been the willing guinea pig in the highly coordinated ‘Surveillance Valley’ Media Monopolies’ who are deeply hooked into all of the branches and agencies of the US Government and Military.

    Even if he’s not and is truly a victime, then either way, the GEC and the ‘Surveillance Valley’ Commisariat still get their data for more algorithms and social and political engineering.

  79. Brother Nathanael August 14, 2018 @ 6:42 pm

    Posting NEW Vid tonight! Hopefully in a few….+bn

  80. Kiimm August 14, 2018 @ 7:53 pm

    Thanks, Bro Nate.

    Mr(s). Jones…has a thing going on…(we know, they know, and you know and I know that it was wrong).

    Shades of the Midwest, U.S.
    https://youtu.be/n2v98PGBZH4 (just a spin).

  81. Parastas August 14, 2018 @ 8:13 pm

    Dear Brother,

    Let me give to you this link to the utterly censored documentary The Magnitsky Act — Behind the scenes, which uncovers the corruption behind the infamous “Magnitsky Act”.

    I’m sure you and your readership will enjoy this little gift

    https://d.tube/#!/v/doessteemitwork/89n1gkl9

    P.S.: the video of the Magnitsky Act documentary will be up only one week, so save it (and mirror it)

  82. Citizenfitz August 15, 2018 @ 1:03 pm

    @the leftist worrier

    So, you’re saying that people who refuse to provide services to homosexuals, e.g., fruitcakes for queer weddings, have a right to refuse?

Leave a comment

Please copy the string LIzCIl to the field below:


Feed