Main Contents

Layers Of Jewish Power

Brother Nathanael Channel Videos!, BroVids

Layers Of Jewish Power
April 12, 2016 ©

Watch ‘EU-Censor-Free!’ HERE!


For More See: Real Money And The Jewish Dialectic Click Here

And: The Jews Who Own The Media Click Here

And: Secrets Of Jewish Money Control Click Here

And: What If Jews Ran America? Click Here

And: Fed’s Fischer: Bail-Ins Coming For Your Cash Click Here

And: Nationalist Solution To Money Click Here

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, PO Box 547, Priest River ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com

Scroll Down For Comments

Brother Nathanael @ April 11, 2016


  1. Brother Nathanael April 11, 2016 @ 8:49 pm

    Text –Text– Text

    Layers Of Jewish Power
    By Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Copyright 2016

    Layers Of Jewish Power

    They overlap and interweave with each other.

    Sometimes they seem to be in opposition.

    But the layers of Jewish power, a multi-sided force, merge into one uniform power bloc.

    Don’t be fooled when they don’t act in unison.

    Jews in the media have their own agenda, especially if they’re dual citizens of Israel and the US.

    Whose side are they on anyways?

    [Clip: “Now Jeffrey, I want to stick on the Republican side. Donald Trump got some praise from Vladimir Putin this week which he seemed to like.”
    “Yes, he did, and I’ve been thinking about this all-all week. I can’t recall a similar experience in which the leading candidate for one of the major parties is praising, and receiving praise, from a-a-a former KGB, I mean, he’s a former KGB official who’s the despot running an adversarial country, Russia.”]

    Why of course it’s “adversarial” for Jews like Goldberg who fear the growing authority of The Church in Russia. For where the Orthodox Church is strong, Jewish power grows weaker.

    And too bad for Goldberg that Putin was just a KGB functionary in East Germany with nothing to do but fill out reports.

    Yes, it’s true, plenty of Jews in the media don’t like Trump, they’re mostly left-leaning Democrats, who at times pose as Republicans.

    But some high-rolling Jews don’t tout the script.

    [Clip: “You told me you agree with some of the things that Donald Trump has said, You disagree with some of the things he has said. Are you endorsing him for president?”
    “Yeah, I am. I’m, I think that we need in this country, I’m sort of being an activist in the country now. I think it’s this sort of a no brainah. You can’t keep it going the way it is. We’re dysfunctional…”]

    No dysfunction at AIPAC, the most powerful Lobby in the world.

    They disprove the notion that all Jews hate Trump.

    For some 18,000 Jews last month gave Trump fervent cheers and standing ovations.

    [Clip: “I came here to speak to you about where I stand on the future of American relations with our strategic ally, our unbreakable friendship, and our cultural brother, the only democracy in the Middle East, the State of Israel. (Applause!) Thank you. My number one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran. (Standing Ovation!)]

    But there’s another layer of Jewish power that plays its cards very close to its chest.

    They don’t dabble in political quarrels. They don’t get wound up over election debates.

    They don’t have to since they control America’s money and care not who makes its laws, or who promises the sky on campaign stumps.

    Stone-face Jews at the Fed keep their cool. They can kill off a country, and a president in a minute by manipulating interest rates and currency valuations.

    I mean, with the power to print money, loan it to the government, and charge interest on it, then the Constitution, which confers that power on Congress, becomes a scrap of paper.

    That’s power my friends, power at the top that no president has.

    Trump can’t come close. They’ve got him covered, not his back, but subtle pressure can do great things.

    It’s all about making America great again, isn’t it?

    They say blondes have more fun…and only their hairdressers know for sure.

    Same with America.

    Layers of Jewish power can do ‘great’ things…and only the Jews at the top know for sure.

  2. Brother Nathanael April 11, 2016 @ 8:50 pm

    Watch This NEW Video Worldwide & In All EU Countries CENSOR FREE:

    “Layers Of Jewish Power” @

    This is my STATE-OF-THE-ART Video Platform AND I OWN It! It Bypasses ALL Jew-Censorship.

    ALL Jew-Ruled EU Countries Can NOW View ALL My Vids Without JEW-CENSORSHIP! @

  3. Brother Nathanael April 11, 2016 @ 8:51 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family,

    If you like my Videos AND Articles, PLEASE help me financially to continue.

    (I am really struggling financially with very few donations coming in for my online ministry.)

    To Donate Your Tax Deductible Contribution Via PayPal CLICK:

    Or Donate Your Tax Deductible Contribution Via Click & Pledge @

    By Mail:

    TO: The Brother Nathanael Foundation; PO Box 547; Priest River ID; 83856.

    Personal Needs: (Moving Expenses, food, necessities etc)

    Brother Nathanael; PO Box 547; Priest River ID 83856.

    PS – ALL cash donations by mail come in safely. Many thanks to those who send cash.

    +Brother Nathanael @

  4. Brother Nathanael April 11, 2016 @ 8:52 pm

    Brother Nathanael At The AIPAC Conference

    +Brother Nathanael at AIPAC!

    +Brother Nathanael at AIPAC!

    +Brother Nathanael at AIPAC!

  5. Brother Nathanael April 11, 2016 @ 8:59 pm

    Dear Real Jew News Family!

    Well, here I am at my NEW (And Improved!) living quarters.

    I now live in Priest River Idaho and I am finally getting the quiet and peace I need.

    Thanks to your support, donations, and prayers, I finally have relief from my previously difficult situation.

    My new hosts are really fine people who have been ever so accommodating. Now I can better focus on my Vids, Articles, and Street Evangelism.

    I’ll have my belongings tomorrow and I plan on doing a Video soon here in this beautiful environment complete with majestic mountains as a natural backdrop.

    Thank you all for your prayers and support!

    +Brother Nathanael

    My NEW Mailing Address:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation/Brother Nathanael (Kapner)
    PO Box 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    (I will STILL be using my Frisco CO PO Box for the entire year with my mail being forwarded to my new POB: Box 547, Priest River, Idaho 83856)

  6. KathJuliane April 11, 2016 @ 10:40 pm

    Absolutely terrific Video, dear +BN, and excellent description of Jewish power being a multi-level force.

    Jewish power isn’t hierarchical, at least in they way we think of it, it’s multi-faceted, and different facets will show depending on the need of the Tribe.

    Jews are neither conservative or liberal. Their sole concern is what’s good for the Jews.

    If it means putting on conservative or liberal jackets, belonging to the Republican or Democratic Party, then that’s what they’ll do in order to accomplish what’s good for the Jews.

    Somewhere around 81% of Jews are Democrats, but if the Republican Party turned out to be better for the Jews, you’d see a major leap in party switching.

    “Good for Jews?” is all Jews care about. They cannot be loyal to any nation but Israel by definition.

    They will not tolerate a restoration of a genuine, principled “America First” grassroots conservative movement, the growlings which we hear in the Trump phenomenon.

    And neither will the complicit neocon Republicans and Democrats, and their Wall Street cronies.

    Is Trump wittingly or unwittingly playing the steam valve for the slowly rising voices of discontent over failed American policies and disasterous military adventures?

    I hope you don’t mind, but I’m reposting a previous comment.

    Trump’s idea of “America First” is that his administration would prevent other nations from taking advantage of the United States.

    He likes the sound of it, and “America First” gets a lot of cheers.

    I do appreciate the fact that Trump is bringing up some of the issues that Pat Buchanan, an Old Right Republican himself (derisively called a “paleoconservative”), brought up in the 1990’s Clinton Era about the terrible trade deals, the loss of manufacturing jobs, factories going abroad, the real wages of Americans stagnating and falling, and illegal immigration. At the same, time, Trump disavowed Buchanan back around 2000.

    I also appreciate the fact that Trump has shaken up the Lucian Republican Party presidential nomination business dominated and controlled by the neocon oligarch establishment “moderate” Republicans since the 1950s, and changed the dynamic of public discourse.

    The Donald has not truly articulated any points resembling historical Old Right Conservative America First anti-war, non-interventionist principles, exemplified in the 1930s, 1940s, and early 1950s by the wing’s leader, Senator Robert A Taft of Ohio, and the conservative wing of anti-war Taft Republicans and allied equally conservative Southern Democrats.

    The Old Right was going up against the war hawk neoconservative and allied Democrat New Deal FDR supporters, Henry Luce American imperialists and internationalists, which became particularly crucial in the run up years leading to WWII.

    Senator Taft, in his lifetime dubbed “Mr. Republican” and the epitome of historical Old Right conservatism was a student of the thought of the Founding Fathers, firmly believed in upholding the Constitutional order, the rule of law, and was an outspoken critic of the Nuremberg Military Tribunals after WWII.

    For an excellent overview of “Taft Republicanism” read:

    The Republican Road Not Taken: The Foreign Policy Vision of Robert A. Taft


    Republican congressional leader Robert A. Taft articulated a non-interventionist foreign-policy vision sharply at odds with the internationalism of Truman and Eisenhower.

    Although derided as ostrich-like, Taft was prescient on several points, such as the structural weakness of the United Nations and the propping up of repressive regimes that would result from U.S. interventionism.

    In April of 1941, after the Lend-Lease Act was passed over America First objections, Colonel Charles A Lindbergh — the most famous face of US non-interventionism and the America First Committee — spoke to a Manhattan rally, laying out the America First take on the global situation and the related the national defense considerations of the USA.

    Lindbergh became a prominent member of the “America First” Committee, a group of business leaders and others who believed that the Roosevelt administration was maneuvering to bring the nation into World War II on the side of England.

    In Lindberg’s view, England was losing the war and it was too late to fix that. He believed the US shouldn’t fight a war it couldn’t win, helping England was depleting America’s defenses, and the US was better off alone:

    “[The America First policy] is based upon the belief that the security of a nation lies in the strength and character of its own people.

    “It recommends the maintenance of armed forces sufficient to defend this hemisphere from attack by any combination of foreign powers.

    “It demands faith in an independent American destiny. This is the policy of the America First Committee today.

    “It is a policy not of isolation, but of independence; not of defeat, but of courage.

    “It is a policy that led this nation to success during the most trying years of our history, and it is a policy that will lead us to success again.

    “We have weakened ourselves for many months, and still worse, we have divided our own people by this dabbling in Europe’s wars.

    “While we should have been concentrating on American defense we have been forced to argue over foreign quarrels.

    “We must turn our eyes and our faith back to our own country before it is too late. And when we do this, a different vista opens before us.

    “Practically every difficulty we would face in invading Europe becomes an asset to us in defending America.”

    In Col. Lindbergh’s Des Moines Speech on September 11, 1941 (interesting date), this speech was met with outrage in many quarters.

    Lindbergh publicly revealed his views about Jews, whom he correctly faulted, along with the British and the FDR administration, for pushing America toward war. He criticized the Jews’ political hold on the FDR administration, and for manipulating the narrative through what he saw as their control of the media.

    That autumn, Luce’s TIME demonized the America First Committee in a cover story as having “touched the pitch of anti-Semitism, and its fingers were tarred.”

    As “America First” was flogged for these views under the clamor of organized Jewry, Henry Robinson Luce and the war hawk FDR-New Deal Neocon Republicans, more moderate non-interventionists dropped out of the committee, despite its protestations that it was not an anti-Semitic group and that it was looking out for the interests of American Jews.

    Henry Robinson Luce, publishing magnate of influential TIME & LIFE magazines, was the US imperialist who coined the term “The American Century” in his then famous 1941 editorial in LIFE Magazine. The term was coined by Luce to describe what he thought the role of the United States would be and should be during the 20th century.

    Luce, the son of a missionary, born in China, with a fundamentalist, messianic visionary role for America, in a February 17, 1941 Life magazine editorial urged the United States to forsake isolationism for a missionary’s role, acting as the world’s Good Samaritan and spreading democracy.

    He called upon the US to enter World War II to defend democratic values:

    “Throughout the 17th century and the 18th century and the 19th century, this continent teemed with manifold projects and magnificent purposes. Above them all and weaving them all together into the most exciting flag of all the world and of all history was the triumphal purpose of freedom.

    “It is in this spirit that all of us are called, each to his own measure of capacity, and each in the widest horizon of his vision, to create the first great American Century.”
    ( )

    According to David Harvey, author of The New Imperialism, Luce believed “the power conferred was global and universal rather than territorially specific, so Luce preferred to talk of an American century rather than an empire.”

    In the same article he called upon United States “to exert upon the world the full impact of our influence, for such purposes as we see fit and by such means as we see fit.”

    Up against the combined power of Jewish lobbies, liberal interventionists, internationalists and warhawks pushing to enter the war, with fewer tactics left at its disposal to keep our country out of war, America First asked President Roosevelt to submit to Congress a declaration of war, for an up or down vote.

    The gambit never had a chance to pan out. The attack on Pearl Harbor of Dec. 7, 1941, removed the possibility of isolation. America was at war, like it or not.

    And we know how FDR and his administration “let it happen on purpose” to have a pretext “day of infamy” to enter the war.

    Telegraph UK: Pearl Harbour memo shows US warned of Japanese attack

    On the 70th anniversary of Pearl Harbour, the attack that propelled America into the Second World War, a declassified memo shows that Japanese surprise attack was expected.
    ( )

    Sober-minded Americans must genuinely counter the “American Century” conceit still plaguing us from Henry R. Luce’s Life magazine editorial of February 17, 1941.

    The popular dynamics of “America First” are there, evidenced first by the Ron Paul presidential campaigns of 2008 and again in 2012. Ron Paul is of the Taft Republican school.

    Luce’s pre-war jingoistic “American Century” proclamation, in his immodestly named Life magazine, contributed to a post-war sense of New World entitlement.

    The rise of Zionist Jew Power and popular “Judeo-Christian” American Zionism during the ’60s finally paved the way for the “New American Century” of the Neocon Right during the Clinton “humanitarian interventionist” 1990s, which +BN has correctly titled, “The Jewamerican Century”, culminating in the mostly Jewish Neocon “Project for a New American Century” which became the formal foreign policy of the Bush Administration.

    Luce’s conceit encouraged Americans to think of ourselves as God’s policemen to the world and entrenched it into foreign policy, and to obsess about our right not only to whatever our rapidly expanding middle-class incomes could buy, but also to what politicians could hand out via federal, state, and local taxes—and a massive deficit-spending spree.

    “American exceptionalism” is a slogan used in many ways. With long-abandoned modesty of the American Fathers and Founders of the American Republic it once described an exemplar nation following the American Enlightenment to a world of tyrannical monarchies and empires, setting an example for indigenous movements for liberal democracy and free markets.

    The American Enlightenment is a period of intellectual ferment in the thirteen American colonies in the period 1714–1818, which led to the American Revolution, and the creation of the American Republic.

    Influenced by the 18th-century European Enlightenment and its own native American philosophy, the American Enlightenment applied scientific reasoning to politics, science, and religion, promoted religious tolerance, and restored literature, the arts, and music as important disciplines and professions worthy of study in colleges.

    One of the most important principles of the American Enlightenment was the establishment of compulsory public primary education for everyone, and the establishment of institutions of higher learning accessible to many.

    The “new-model” American style colleges of King’s College New York (now Columbia University), and the College of Philadelphia (now Penn) were founded, Yale College and the College of William & Mary were reformed, and a non-denominational moral philosophy replaced theology in many college curricula.

    Even Puritan colleges such as the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University) and Harvard University reformed their curricula to include natural philosophy (science), modern astronomy, and mathematics.

    Among the foremost representatives of the American Enlightenment were presidents of colleges: Puritan religious leaders Jonathan Edwards, Thomas Clap, and Ezra Stiles, and Anglican moral philosophers Samuel Johnson and William Smith.

    The leading American Enlightenment political thinkers were John Adams, James Madison, George Mason, James Wilson, and Alexander Hamilton, and polymaths Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson.

    Leading scientists included Benjamin Franklin for his work on electricity, William Smith for his organization and observations of the Transit of Venus, Jared Eliot for his work in metallurgy and agriculture, the astronomer David Rittenhouse in astronomy, math, and instruments, Benjamin Rush in medical science, Charles Willson Peale in natural history, and Cadwallader Colden for his work in botany and town sanitation.

    Colden’s daughter, Jane Colden, was the first female botanist working in America.

    The formation of the Russia-America friendship entente, perhaps the most unlikely an odd-couple diplomatic, political, economic, trade and cultural friendship between two countries ever in the history of the world which endured for almost a century was laid down in this era, commencing with US trade relations established with Empress Catherine I shortly after the War of Independence.

    In 1809, President James Madison appointed the Presbyterian Puritan and John Quincy Adams, son of Founding Father John Adams, as the first United States Minister to Russia. He spent nearly five years in St. Petersburg, with his wife, Louisa Adams, became a close friend to Tsar Alexander I and his family, and became favorites of the royal court.

    In 1812, Adams reported to Washington the news of Napoleon’s invasion of Russia and Napoleon’s subsequent failure in his Russian campaign.

    In 1814, Adams was recalled from Russia to serve as the chief negotiator for the Treaty of Ghent, ending the War of 1812 between Great Britain and the United States, and in which Tsar Alexander I played no small part in defending the new American Republic from the imperial designs of Britain to regain her lost colonies, and held the other European crowned heads at bay.

    Adams then remained in London as Minister to the Court of St. James’s, a position first held by his father.

    “Whenever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will be America’s heart, her benedictions and her prayers. But she does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy.

    “She is the wellwisher to freedom and independence for all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.

    “She well knows that by once enlisting other banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extridition, in all wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom….

    “She might become the dictress of the world but would no longer be ruler of her own spirit….Americans should not go abroad to slay dragons they do not understand in the name of spreading democracy.”–John Quincy Adams As Secretary of State under James Monroe administration.

    This, in a nutshell, is what made America “exceptional” at the time, and for much of the 19th century, until the US began to get an avaricious and greedy taste for imperial adventures, starting with “regime change” in Hawaii.

    Through much of the 19th century, imperial powers were vying for financial dominance in China, most notably France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Japan, Russia and, of course, the USA. The U.S. began to worry that their financial interests were in jeopardy. So, the U.S. Secretary of State, John Hay, contacted the nations involved and asked for an agreement that all these powers have equal access to China.

    This became known as the Open Door Policy to China. The only party that was not included in the international Open Door Policy was the Chinese. A group of Chinese nationalists, the Righteous Harmony Society, fed up with foreign imperialists and Christianity encroaching on their homeland, began to grow.

    Although the Open Door notes served American purposes, the imperialist powers in China perceived little benefit for themselves in endorsing a request that they pursue a policy of self-denial in areas under their control.

    The United States was offering them nothing in return.

    On the other hand, the Americans were not challenging the existence of spheres of influence or interests they considered vital. No country saw any point in insulting Washington by rejecting Hay’s request. Most replies were evasive and qualified, as each nation protected its particular interests, but all, in effect, endorsed Hay’s principles.

    Hays’ notes were the ideal means for the administration to satisfy pressures from those who sought the expansion of American economic interests and from romantic nationalists eager to see the United States play a larger role in world affairs—without risking an overseas involvement that would lack broader public support.

    He and McKinley announced that American interests in China had been safeguarded. They were convinced also that they had contributed to the preservation of the Chinese empire.The months that followed Hay’s notes were not marked by reforms leading to the modernization of China’s government or society.

    At the time of the American initiative in 1899, opponents of reform, led by Cixi, the empress dowager, were in control in Beijing. She and her supporters were channeling unrest in North China into an anti-foreign resistance movement led by men known as the Boxers—a loose amalgam of martial arts and invulnerability ritual societies who opposed the foreign encroachments and the spread of Christianity.

    The destruction of missionary properties and murder of Chinese Christians intensified and could not be ignored. The United States joined several European nations in demanding that the Chinese government put an end to the outrages, but to no avail. To the magic powers allegedly possessed by the Boxers, Cixi added the modern weapons of the imperial army.

    She called the Boxers to Beijing and ordered the massacre of all foreigners, including the diplomatic community. The legation quarter became an embattled fortress, subject to incessant attack, cut off from outside contacts.

    The war with Spain had brought American troops to the Philippines and suppression of a Filipino insurrection had required their continued presence in East Asia. With the lives of American diplomats, businessmen, and missionaries endangered in China, the McKinley administration had both the resources and the will to protect its people and their interests against the Chinese.

    Several thousand Americans were among the troops that ultimately defeated the Boxers and lifted the siege of the legation. Long before they reached Beijing, however, Hay had sent off a second round of Open Door notes.

    As the Boxer War began, Hay feared the collapse and dismemberment of China. It seemed likely that the European Powers generally and the Russians in particular would find Chinese provocations sufficient to justify further encroachments on Chinese sovereignty.

    Once the foreign armies fought their way to Beijing, they would not be removed easily—and it might prove very difficult to protect American interests.

    In July 1900, Hay sent off a circular message expressing concern for the preservation of Chinese sovereignty, the “territorial and administrative entity” of China. Hoping to contain the war to North China, Hay defined the situation as a state of virtual anarchy in which power and responsibility rested with local authorities.

    The McKinley administration worked with high-ranking Chinese officials who controlled southern and central provinces, suppressed the Boxers and protected foreigners and their property. Together they established the myth that the Boxers were acting spontaneously, rebelling against the Chinese government as well as attacking foreigners.

    Thus the war could be limited in area and intensity and the possible partition of China forestalled.

    And this is how the American road to hell became paved with the best of imperial intentions, and how, in the words of John Q Adams, America became no longer the ruler of her own spirit for the sake of craving world power.

    But now most often, “American exceptionalism” is employed by warmongers and nation builders to justify the projection of Jewmerican hard power, especially for the sake of that crappy, vicious, morally vacuous little Jewish “democracy” in the Middle East.

    The myth of “American exceptionalism” has been distorted and sorely abused by many presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, George W. Bush.

    The latest of which was Barack Obama who parroted Bilious and Hildebeast Clintons arrogant anointment of America as “the indispensable nation,” and the next president, whoever it might be, won’t be changing the script.

    “Make America Great Again” sounds an awful lot like a Trumpian twist on “American exceptionalism.” What about “Make America Good Again” instead?

    Trump is not an isolationist or non-interventionist. His new “America First” foreign policy model just sounds good to him, it means what he wants it to mean, apparently without thought as to the political history and struggles that goes with “America First”.
    ( )

    The most recent near revival of Old Right American First anti-war conservatism was ushered in by Ron Paul and the Tea Party until it was hijacked by the “moderate” hawk establishment neocon Jews and Republicans as the Tea Party Patriots, Inc.

    Dumpf sees most US allies as weak at best and free-riders at worst. He denounces alliances and institutions that he says constrain US action and cost the taxpayer too much money. He doesn’t want to scrap the NATO military alliance—he just thinks France, Germany and others should pay more of NATO’s bills.

    Trump is just peachy with NATO, has not said anything about dissolving the Atlantic Treaty or pulling out of NATO. He just wants the NATO countries to pay more out of their own national budgets for US defense.

    Trump’s attitude toward South Korea and Japan shows that he considers no US partnership sacred—unless he’s speaking to Netanyahu and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

    A few weeks ago, Trump declared that he would remain “neutral” in negotiations between Israel and Palestinians, despite blaming the Palestinians to start with. Overlooked is the fact that he stated he merely wanted to put on the appearance of being neutral in order to clinch a deal.

    Even in this pretense of “neutrality”, Trump spectacularly backpedaled at AIPAC’s annual policy conference on March 20 using a teleprompter speech which +BN documented was written by his Zionist son-in-law Jared Kushner, a scion of Netanyahu’s Likud Party West.

    The US spends nearly $6 billion in foreign military financing, more than half of which goes just to Israel with big increases on the horizon, all authorized spending by a Jew-loving, Israel-worshipping Congress.

    This doesn’t count what goes to Tel Aviv in the way of government dark money and other indirect expenditures, such as for the Israeli weapons industry, scientific research, and internet technology; and charitable contributions by Judeo-Christian and Jewish Zionist organizations.

    Trump won’t change anything in the way of Israel policy, and he’s employing the best in the way of neocon and Jewish Muslim-hater propagandists as advisors and consultants.

    And truth be told, Jewmerican support for Israel was never really in question—72 percent of Americans view Israel favorably.
    ( )

    Trump’s a populist, after all.

  7. olivier April 12, 2016 @ 1:16 am

    Of course, bringing back America First and supporting Jews or AIPAC at the same time is not compatible.

    Trump will have to choose between patriotism and Jews’ politics.

  8. Irene Bonney Faulkes April 12, 2016 @ 3:39 am

    Truly said and surely, he who holds the purse has the power.

    The Jews not only have the U.S.A. in their clutches, i.e. those at the top in particular, but the whole world and right now, especially Europe.

    The power is Satanic. It is Anti-Christ. These ones are the embodiment of the fallen evil Watchers.

    Their cunning, deceit, rapacity, robbery, murders and stealing of identities as well as of a nation’s wealth, are of pagan Babylon.

    Is it in their personal interest to have a Great America?

    Or is it Doomsday?

    None of us know.

    Our Brother is now in a beautiful place among the mountains.

    Now is a good time to be breathing the heavenly atmosphere of the mountains of His presence.

    The enemies are down the mountains in the lower realms seeking to devour but fellowship in the purity up higher, will overcome the darkness of those downhill opponents.

    Victory is thus assured.

  9. Pete Parra April 12, 2016 @ 6:55 am

    God Bless u Brother!

    I found an interesting website, that perhaps you may have encountered, which is

    The website speaks about what you are talking how the neocon Jews are doing too.

  10. Ft. Nolan April 12, 2016 @ 7:36 am

    Location, location, location… Priest River makes for a longer roadtrip compared to Frisco, nonetheless, it is worth the added time getting there.

    Your video here was on YT less than thirty minutes, receiving 450 views (!!!) plus numerous comments. You must be doing something right Brother Nate. We wait anxiously for your next installments.

    For those interested in looking for something very Pro-Trump, check out “Intellectual Froglegs” on YT (JoeDanMedia) and its attendant website. Joe Dan Gorman makes some very impressive cases against the entrenched establishment and its stranglehold on We The People.

  11. Patrick J. O'Brien April 12, 2016 @ 8:05 am

    Dear KathJuliane,

    Beautiful article. Just beautiful. Like Brother Nathanael.


  12. Citizenfitz April 12, 2016 @ 10:09 am

    Well, that’s just like the Jews, isn’t it?

    Create the KGB one day… then damn you for being a KGB agent the next.

  13. Santiago Ramirez April 12, 2016 @ 11:43 am

    Jews hate everything and everyone to the point Jews are incapable of true love, compassion or joy.

    Jews are also incapable of sublime arts and thoughts.

    Jews hate themselves to the point of feeling proud of having become a self destructive human group.

    Everything in Judaism looks to be meticulously planned and well organized under the guidance of evil principles to reach evil goals.

    No other human organization has proven so evil than the Jewish one gangs.

  14. paschn April 12, 2016 @ 11:54 am

    Israel, in addition to being a true nuclear rogue nation equal to Sewer Nation, is NOT a democracy.

    As I had feared, Trump is just another member of the Judas Class.

    There’s only one way out: Secede from this foul, rancid “thing” called the United States. Kill it before it kills the world and hands it to “the Synagogue”.

  15. Ya April 12, 2016 @ 12:10 pm

    Donald the King of New York plays his card
    Pretending he understands why life is hard
    Saying the slogans the fools think are true
    Pretending he thinks just like her, him & you

    Wall against Mexicans, no jobs for the Chink
    Troops out of danger, like duh, do-ya-think?
    Trillions for war he pretends he’d stop spend-in
    But AIPAC ovations means the fix is still all-in

    Daughter’s a Jew, so’s his son and grand-kids
    Daddy was shabbos-goy, his biz was with Yids
    Steeped in the stew… kosher as a clown can be
    He’s pledged to send Jerusalem the US Embassy

    So go ahead and HOPE for a CHANGE, whoop-de-do!
    You swallowed that stinker in 2008, yes… YOU!
    This clown says “this” and “that” and the other
    But once he’s elected the USA won’t recover

    Your choice is quite clear, what to do & why
    Either stand up and do it, or just get ready to cry
    For President there’s a procedure, if the Jews do you hate
    Use the “write-in” on the ballot, and vote for Brother Nate!

  16. Citizenfitz April 12, 2016 @ 12:45 pm

    A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Europe

    Britain: When traveling in Britain be careful when using public transportation – *stay in the same seat*. Changing seats in Britain is viewed as evidence of a crime.

    Always check what is permissible speech in France, Germany, Austria etc, before opening your mouth.

    British authorities don’t know what’s going on! They’re not sure of their own laws and will throw you in jail while jabbering endlessly about whether you have committed a crime or not.

    A surefire way out of any strife is to apologize to the local Jewish community. A donation will be expected.

    France: When traveling through France always remember to keep your mouth shut about certain aspects of history.

    Permitted words do include, “proof… there’s… no… Hitler… six… million… killed… Jews….” But be extremely careful how you put them together.

    The French are excitable folks! Make sure your math is impeccable: 6,000,000 – 1 = 3 to five years in France.

    A sure fire way out of trouble is to apologize to the local Jewish community. A donation will be expected.

    BeNeLux: The best way to travel through these countries is on tip toes with your head on a swivel.

    Speak only in whispers – even with close friends in their living rooms. Always have someone watching your back.

    You may feel as if you’re being watched. You are! So be discreet.

    Don’t give the police any idea you have doubts about certain aspects of history.

    A sure fire way for getting out of trouble is to apologize to the local Jewish community. A donation will be expected.

    Austria: See Germany below.

    Germany: The best way to travel through Germany is at 500 miles an hour, at 35,000 feet, with a paper bag over your head and your lips sewed shut.

    Get in and get out as fast as you can.

    DO NOT THINK! Thinking is a crime in Germany.

    Don’t let anyone observe facial expressions that tell them you’re thinking as you will be reported and followed. Never use vocabulizations like umm… err.. or, ahhhh…. They’re dead giveaways that you’re thinking.

    German authorities dislike thinkers and throw them, and their lawyers too, into prison. And do not use words like “truth”, “integrity” or “justice” at your thought crimes trial as this will only anger them even more. Such language is not permitted in Germany.

    If you do find yourself in trouble, just say: “Hitler holocausted… gassed… electrocuted… made soap outta… barbecued…lampshaded… boiled in oil… nuked… raped… six million Jews!”.

    This will favorably impress the judge and shorten your prison sentence. But ya gotta’ say it with a straight face. Good luck with that!

    A sure fire way outta any strife is to apologize to the local Jewish community.

    A donation will be expected….

  17. Robert April 12, 2016 @ 12:50 pm

    They have canceled the election in Colorado and given it to Cruz.

    If they are deathly afraid of Trump, who pledges support for Israel, then there is absolutely no hope in this political system whatsoever.

    Scrap the whole think out of your mind!

    There is only one hope!!!!

    And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. Daniel 2:44

    It is time to wake up and give God all of the glory!

  18. Citizenfitz April 12, 2016 @ 1:06 pm

    “The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered, they lack many of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence.

    They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.”

    -H.L. Menken

  19. Ya April 12, 2016 @ 1:48 pm

    Cruz is a Cuban they say, maybe so
    But blood in his veins seems to be Hebrew flow
    Could it be that this jerk is just Crypto as Hell?
    Bet on it big-time, before Jew-time will tell

    Bernie the Jew pretends he’s just really a Pole
    Of course this Commie thinks we just want the dole
    But push comes to shove and Ol’ Bern’s stripes will show
    They’re horizontal & blue with a Hexagram in tow

    Hill-Billary they call it, this Beast from the past
    When Jews bark their orders she does their will fast
    Jew ancestors, yes… like Albright that witch
    Can find them convenient, to prove Tribal itch

    Oh when will we have a real Christian to lead
    This Country built up by great word and good deed
    Perot or Buchanan or Lucky Lindy we need
    No more these Jews with their lying and greed

    We’re at War dear America, with the Devil’s own spawn
    We’re at War whether you like it, but not like Red Dawn
    Wake up now or see the last chance for peace fade
    The Jew wants Dominion, so choose slavery or blade

  20. Eileen K. April 12, 2016 @ 1:50 pm


    Yes, KJ, you made brilliant points on Jewry, and I agree 100%.

    Last night I began reading Mike S. King’s book – THE BAD WAR – and found paragraphs on the America First Committee and Charles Lindbergh, which you’ve posted.

    You also mentioned Henry Robinson Luce, a missionary who avidly supported FDR’s push for war. Mike mentions him – as well as Robert A. Taft – in his book.

    I assume you already have a copy; the points you made on Taft, Lindbergh and Henry R. Luce are also in THE BAD WAR.

    Your insight into Jewry’s agenda are, indeed, spot on; and, Br. Nathanael’s is as well. You’re right up to his level when it comes to the JWO.

    It’s great to read a critique that’s sensible, knowledgeable and right to the point, without emotional baggage clouding the narrative. Thank you.

  21. James Woroble Jr April 12, 2016 @ 2:20 pm


    I am very pleased and greatly relieved that your living situation has resolved itself in such a positive manner.

  22. Eileen K. April 12, 2016 @ 3:19 pm

    @Br. Nathanael

    I’m so happy that you’re finally settled in your new location at Priest River, Idaho, Br. Nat. Even that name sounds peaceful and quiet; and your articles also reflect the peace and quiet you’re now experiencing.

    Your hosts deserve all the Lord’s blessings for opening the doors to their spacious home to you. As you’ve already experienced, not many people are that generous as to open the doors to their homes to a stranger (even an Orthodox Christian monk such as you).

    Re: Jewry’s evil agenda of destroying nations and their sovereignty through their One World Govt, you nailed it brilliantly. I haven’t seen this layering that you included in this article on any other website.

    You had mentioned a number of times that as a Jew who converted to Orthodox Christianity and became a monk, you know how Jews think and how they operate.

    I agree; it takes a Jew – even one that’s converted to Christianity – to know the intricacies of how Jews operate.

    Their concern is, does any plan and/or policy benefit their Tribe. They regard all non-Jews as cattle, to be either enslaved or exterminated.

    Their goal has been, for centuries, total world domination. They created both the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations, through which to rule the entire planet. They’re behind the UN’s Agenda 21 – now 2030 – an agenda for exterminating 90% of the world’s population, bringing it down to 500,000.

    The Jews, as you’ve said several times, want to reduce the world’s population to 500,000 – a manageable number for them to control.

    They use their layering process to deceive the Gentiles into complacency; but in their hubris, they’ve failed to notice that the Gentile world is waking up to their evil agenda .. the cancellation of the erection of an Arch to Baal (or Satan) scheduled to take place in New York’s Time Square, due to strong protests from Christians .. is an example of this wakening.

    I’m very happy that you don’t have to worry about paying rent anymore, since your hosts have given you the room and house privileges rent free. I wish you the best in your new digs, Br. Nat; and, don’t forget to take a little time to take in the beautiful scenery and take some photos.

    God bless you always,


  23. KathJuliane April 12, 2016 @ 3:27 pm

    Jeff Goldberg: “Yes, he did, and I’ve been thinking about this all-all week.

    “I can’t recall a similar experience in which the leading candidate for one of the major parties is praising, and receiving praise, from a-a-a former KGB, I mean, he’s a former KGB official who’s the despot running an adversarial country, Russia.”

    Oh, the horror! The horror! That’s as bad as being a Cherman Natzy™, eh? Jeffrey Mark Goldberg, you sadistic, amoral, crypto-Kahanist, you.

    It’s sometimes fascinating reading when relatively rare Left Zionist Jews with a higher moral ethical calling, spill the beans on Right Zionist Jews (even if they call them “Nazis”), particularly calling out the chameleon-like American-Israeli Goldberg, who has been described as a neoconservative, a liberal, a Zionist and a critic of Israel.

    Some Wiki notes: Goldberg was born in Brooklyn, New York, the son of Ellen and Daniel Goldberg, and raised in suburban Malverne.

    He attended the University of Pennsylvania, where he was editor-in-chief of The Daily Pennsylvanian.

    While at Penn he worked at the Hillel kitchen serving lunch to students. He left college to move to Israel, where he served in the Israeli Defense Forces as a prison guard during the First Intifada at Ketziot, a prison camp set up to hold Palestinian rebels.

    He later returned to the United States to resume his journalism career.

    Goldberg began his career at The Washington Post, where he was a police reporter.

    While in Israel, he worked as a columnist for The Jerusalem Post, and upon his return to the US served as the New York bureau chief of The Forward, a contributing editor at New York magazine, and a contributing writer at The New York Times Magazine.

    Thanks, Wiki

    From S.H.A.M.E. (Shame the Hacks Who Abuse Media Ethics):

    The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg Was a Follower of Jewish Rightwing Terrorist Meir Kahane

    By Yasha Levine

    On August 15, 2012, in West Jerusalem, a small group of Palestinian teenagers was attacked by a mob of Israeli youths.

    The New York Times described it as an “attempted lynching.”

    The Israelis, who had apparently planned on lynching someone that night, set their sights on a couple of Palestinian kids hanging out at a busy city square, chased one of them down and then beat him until his heart had stopped.

    His name was Jamal Julani, a 17-year-old resident of East Jerusalem. He only survived because a medical student happened to be on the scene and was able to resuscitate him in time. The beating took place in full view of hundreds of people, who stood by and watched without intervening.

    According to an eye witness in account in The Jerusalem Post, “People who tried to resuscitate the Arab were mocked by the crowd of Jewish youths.”

    But The Atlantic’s Jeffery Goldberg wouldn’t have any of it. He downplayed the seriousness of the attack, and went after a New York Times reporter for implying that the lynching was a sign of systemic racism in Israel.

    He then tried to whitewash the violence and then excused it by pinning the attack on poor, uneducated Arab Jews:

    “This sort of thing isn’t actually that new.

    “As someone who covered the funeral procession of Meir Kahane, the racist rabbi assassinated in New York more than 20 years ago, I can attest to the fact that Jewish hooligans, mainly from Jerusalem’s poorest neighborhoods (and many who are descendants of Jews who fled, or were expelled, from Arab countries), will periodically set themselves upon innocent Arabs.

    “They did it at the funeral, and in subsequent incidents.”

    Goldberg packed in a lot of evil lies into that one small paragraph.

    First, there’s his sleazy insinuation that Arab Jews are somehow solely responsible for the violence against Palestinians, a disgusting expression of Ashkenazi racism that blames darker-skinned Sephardic Jews for all the ills of Israeli society. [ 1 ]

    Then there’s his suggestion that the brutal beating of Julani was somehow understandable or even justified because the Israeli kids doing the beating were “mainly … descendants of Jews who fled, or were expelled, from Arab countries.” Meaning that the lynched Palestinian kid had only had his own Arab brothers to blame for what happened to him.

    But the juiciest lie is in what Goldberg left out…Goldberg boasts about coming face-to-face with Jewish hooligans while covering the funeral of the ultra-rightwing anti-Arab rabbi Meir Kahne, as if to give readers the impression that his familiarity with Jewish anti-Arab extremism comes from his experience working as a journalist in Israel.

    But it’s a bit more complicated than that. Goldberg’s connection to anti-Arab extremism is deeper and much more personal.

    Fact is, Goldberg self-consciously dodged having to tell his readers the truth. That is: he was himself a one-time die-hard follower and believer in Kahane’s racist rightwing extremist ideas. Goldberg might condemn their anti-Palestinian violence today and call it “appalling,” but he would have been openly supporting and cheering it on when he was the same age as the Israeli thugs who lynched Julani.

    Goldberg has been trying to play the role of liberal Zionist lately, and clearly doesn’t like bringing up his ultra-rightwing past.

    But he had no problem describing his childhood conversion to Kahane’s violent anti-Arab ideology in his 2008 memoir Prisoners—the thing to remember is that Kahane founded the Jewish Defense League (JDL), which the FBI and the State Department have classified as a terrorist organization, no different than al-Qaida.

    Here’s how he describes it:

    And soon enough I came across the writings of Meir Kahane, on a high shelf, and it was Kahane who provided a not un-Panther-like but specifically Semitic model of self-defense. Kahane was the Brooklyn rabbi who founded the Jewish Defense League in 1968 to shake Jews out of their fatalistic and feminized passivity.

    He argued, infamously, in favor of the bat, the bomb, and the gun. (“Every Jew a .22,” he said, to the shame and horror of the Manhattan Jewish elite and to the secret joy of every beaten-down Jewboy in the tristate area.) . . .

    But for a time he held all the answers for me. In the locker room, I was a kike, but in the sanctuary of the library, I was a revolutionary kike, one of Kahane’s chayas, a beast, a street-fighting Jew. What exactly did Kahane inspire in the the geeky “beaten-down Jewboy” from Long Island to fantasize about being part of Kahane’s yarmulke-wearing brownshirt goon squad?

    “FYI: The chayas were the paramilitary arm of the Jewish Defense League first deployed by Kahane to square off against inner city blacks and “frighten the anti-Semite to the roots of his soul.” [ 2 ]

    Well, at the time of young Goldberg became “fascinated” with the teachings of Meir Kahane, the rightwing orthodox rabbi had moved from Brooklyn to Israel and was calling for the mass ethnic cleansing and “slaughter” (in Kahane’s own words) of all Arabs living in Israel and the Occupied Territories.

    In 1980, Kahane was arrested in Israel “on charges that he planned armed terrorist attacks on West Bank Arabs to avenge the killing of Jews in the occupied territory,” reported UPI on May 1980. The report noted that the “New York-born rabbi and some followers had organized an armed underground against Arabs in the West Bank town of Hebron.”

    Later, in 1988, Kahane’s political party would be banned in Israel for espousing racism—no easy feat in Israel’s racist culture—and he was barred from taking his seat in the Israeli Knesset.

    In 1990, after spending nearly two decades agitating for the violent ethnic cleansing of all non-Jews from Israel, Kahane was whacked in Manhattan by an Egyptian man.

    Four years later, a Kahane follower would finally carry out the rabbi’s plan for Hebron and massacred 29 unarmed Palestinians in a mosque, cutting them down with a machine gun as they prayed.

    Kahane developed his violent rightwing politics while still in America, using the Jewish Defense League and its chaya brownshirts squads to terrorize inner city blacks, Muslims and Soviet officials on U.S. soil.

    In 1971 Kahane was convicted of manufacturing firebombs in New York. The next year, JDL was suspected of firebombing the offices of a promotor Sol Hurok in New York to protest his booking of Soviet artists for U.S. tours.

    The bomb didn’t stop the tours, but it did manage to kill young woman. In 1973, Kahane kept pressing his followers to keep trying to carry out a successful assassination, writing in a letter: “if we can’t get someone to shoot a Russian diplomat (anyone), we are Jewish pigs and deserve what we get.”

    The Southern Poverty Law Center described Kahane’s JDL as a hate group “that preaches a radical form of anti-Arab Jewish nationalism” targeting Muslims, diplomats, critics, and even Jews it deems “not Jewish enough.”

    JDL was implicated in a number of bombing attacks on Soviet and Arab office properties on U.S. soil, leading the FBI and the U.S. State Department to classify the JDL as a “right-wing terrorist group.”

    Kahane never served any time in the U.S. probably because of his close ties to various intelligence services.

    According to False Prophet: Rabbi Meir Kahane : From FBI Informant to Knesset Member, Kahane worked as a FBI informant starting from the early 1960s and throughout his career enjoyed the backing of Mossad and ultra-rightwing factions political factions.

    But the man clearly got out of hand even for his spook handlers. Eventually, the FBI, Israel and even the U.S. State Department labeled the JDL a “terrorist organization.”

    But Kahane didn’t mind the terrorist label; he aspired to it. In a 1972 Playboy interview, Kahane admitted that there was not much difference between him and Nazi white supremacists:

    PLAYBOY: “Then the only difference between you and, say, the American Nazi Party is that they’re wrong and you’re right?”

    KAHANE: “I can’t put it better than that.”

    How long did Goldberg’s fascination with Kahane last?

    In Prisoners, Goldberg writes that he became disillusioned “later in life” when he “would come to know Kahane personally.” Later in life? How much later?

    Goldberg said that he had “grown disenchanted” with Kahane’s ideas by the time he went to college in the 1980s, but admitted that he still couldn’t help being drawn to the bearded Zionist warrior: “in a speech he gave to hundreds of students—most of whom were properly liberal and predisposed to loathe him—he laid out what he saw as the hypocrisy of Jewish life in America in an unapologetic, ribald, and revolutionary way, and we surrendered momentarily to his charisma.”

    How old was Goldberg when Kahane no longer “held all the answers for me”?

    This old?

    And Goldberg was still sweet on Kahane in 1990, when the rabbi was shot by an assassin.

    He recalls attending the funeral in Jerusalem and watching in disgust as Kahane’s supporters ran around screaming “Death to the Arabs!” and beating any Palestinian they came across: “Kahane would have been proud of his mourners, and he would have called the Jewish soldiers who beat them back kapos and quislings. There was no space in my heart for such a man.”

    Yet he quickly added that “when [Kahane’s] grandsons asked me what I remembered of him, I answered, ‘He had very profound thoughts,’ which was true.” That doesn’t sound like disenchantment. More like Goldberg’s in denial about his true feelings.

    So the question is: Why the sudden shyness? Why did you boast about covering Kahane’s funeral without ever noting that you was once a follower? It didn’t seem to bother in 2008, when you published his book. So why should it now?

    So come on, Jeffrey, why not relax and let your inner brownshirt chaya hang loose? Like you did in this 2006 New Yorker interview about your experience working as a jailor in Israel’s largest detention camp for Palestinian political prisoners: [ 3 ]

    “It was hopelessly exotic for me. I mean, I’m from the South Shore of Long Island, and then all of a sudden I’m in the Negev Desert, by the Egyptian border, as a prison guard in what’s probably the largest prison in the Middle East, guarding the future leaders of Palestine. It was pretty exciting.”

    Yasha Levine is a co-founder of the S.H.A.M.E. Project.


    1. Hell, you don’t have to be an expert on Israeli-Palestinian clusterfuck to realize that Arab Jews can’t be blamed for anti-Palestinian violence. After all, what’s one “attempted lynching” of a Palestinian kid in West Jerusalem, compared to, say, the systematic bombing of a civilian population in Gaza with phosphorous bombs?

    2. From Kahane’s The Story of the Jewish Defense League:

    One of the things we had done in our efforts to obtain well-trained, strong, and tough Jews for effective action against Jew-haters was to create a special group of fighters which we named the Chaya Squad. The word chaya in Hebrew means “beast,” and we wanted to develop Jewish “beasts” or “animals” who would frighten the anti-Semite to the roots of his soul.

    They served an invaluable function in the changing of the Jewish image in America. . . . It was a thing of joy to find a big, strong Jewish youngster band train him to defend Jewish honor, bodies, and property.

    It was an even more satisfying thing to watch so many of the Chayas go into battle with their yarmulkes on their heads. . . . the yarmulke had come to mean something special for them. It shouted out: “I am a Jew and, Jew-hater, as you get beaten I want you to know that a Jew is doing it.”

    It was repayment for the cutting off of Jewish beards while Nazi soldiers laughed.”

    3. In the early 1990s, Goldberg served as a prison guard at Ktzi’ot, Israel’s largest detention camp for Palestinian political prisoners. The prison has long been criticized for its inhumane conditions, including frequent beatings, lack of drinking water and forced labor.

    Among the hundreds of books forbidden to prisoners at Ktzi’ot have been The Lord of the Rings and Hamlet.

    In Prisoners, Goldberg described a scene from Ktzi’ot in which his friend repeatedly hit a Palestinian prisoner in the head with a with a heavy, sharp-edged army radio, beating him to a bloody pulp, a beating that Goldberg “deduced was prompted by something [the prisoner] said.”

    Goldberg admits that he lied to cover up the crime: “I found another military policeman, and handed off the wobbling prisoner, who was by now bleeding on me. ‘He fell,’ I lied.”

    SHAME Publishes Profile on Jeffrey Goldberg: Prison Camp Guard, War Booster & Israeli Apartheid Apologist

    That Jeff Goldberg! Why, he was (is) a-a-a Kahanist!

  24. Kalin April 12, 2016 @ 3:51 pm

    Well, it’s probably just that the JewSA falls.

    After all the raping, pillageing and slaughtering that we’ve done around the world the last 118 years, it seems quite unjust if it doesn’t come back to us.

  25. Zionien April 12, 2016 @ 4:25 pm

    The Evils of Jewry is really a self-identifying past time/hobbie for the demented sadistic/sociopathetic self glorifying Jew.

    They are The Synagogue Of Satan!

  26. KathJuliane April 12, 2016 @ 7:38 pm

    @Eileen K.

    I was raised in a 1950s-1960s California Taft Republican family (branches of my mother’s side of the family goes back to 1600’s Colonial America) although my Greek American father was a conservative Taft Labor Democrat, making my family an extension of the “Old Right” America-First movement, which included conservative Democrats, mainly from the South.

    So, I remembered somewhat the political dinner talk of my parents and grandparents, who went through WWII as anti-New Deal, anti-war America Firsters, when they sometimes rehashed the era.

    Then when Pearl Harbor occurred, members on both sides (and sexes) of my family did their patriotic duty, enlisting in the Army and the Navy. And they rehashed the homefront politics of the war as well.

    Before I was born, my mother joined the Women’s Auxilliary Corps (WAC); one of my aunts who had a pilot’s license was accepted as a pilot for the Women’s Auxilliary Ferrying Squadron (WAFS), which was later merged in 1943 with the Women’s Flying Training Detachment (WFTD) to create the paramilitary aviation organization, the Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP).

    No, I don’t have Mike King’s book.

    But, Mike King is an example of the fact that there’s considerable renewed interest growing in Taft Republicanism among conservative, anti-war, enlightened nationalist political thinkers, such as Buchanan and Justin Raimondo of who has for years promoted Senator Taftand his political principles, and keeps the America First Committee close to his political heart.

    Raimondo’s 2010 article “Antiwar Republican” inspired me to delve back into my stubborn, weedy, political roots and that of my family, and those war and post-war eras in American history that I was born into, and which shaped my own political views.

    If nothing else on the American political scene, as much as I don’t care for The Donald and his “Make Trump Great Again” campaign, I have to appreciate how he’s acting something like the fireman’s axe being used to vent the roof of a house on fire in US politics, particularly inside the Republican Party among the common people.

    Maybe, just maybe, we can save the American house with what he, the mischievous contrarian, has opened up in the public sphere.

    The neocon, war-mongering Eastern Establishment wing of the GOP has had a lock on the Republican Party since the 1940s, but Trump, by accident or design, is waking people, and in many cases, long slumbering memories, up.

    The grassroots Republicans who are responding to Trump, especially in the Midwest who are in their 40s, 50s, 60s, and older, are responding to loud echoes from the conservative grassroots political culture which is historically that of the late great senator from Ohio, Robert Alphonso Taft, “Mr. Republican” and his political principles.

    Raimondo: Nationalism and Its Discontents: The Meaning of Trump (excerpt)

    The return of dreaded “isolationism” is cause for celebration

    “Wright’s characterization of Trump’s attitude toward Putin as an “embrace” is a typical ploy by the War Party, which always portrays a non-belligerent stance as a love affair: what Trump actually said, however, is that “I could get along with Putin” – a definite no-no in Washington, where the new cold war is raging on both sides of the aisle.

    Contrast this with the position taken by most of the other GOP candidates, such as Christie, Rubio, and Bush, who proudly proclaim they’d confront Russian planes in the skies over Syria, risking World War III.

    Examining Trump’s foreign policy pronouncements over the years – the GOP frontrunner wonders why we are stationing 28,000 troops in South Korea, complains that we’re defending Japan while they slap tariffs on our products, and says we have no business stationing tens of thousands of soldiers in Europe, which can damn well take care of itself – Wright trots out the hate figures interventionists love to excoriate.

    Trump is like Robert A. Taft, who didn’t want us to join NATO: he’s like Charles Lindbergh, a leader of the anti-interventionist America First Committee, a particular hate-figure of the interventionist-neocon foreign policy Establishment.

    And, of course, Trump is an “isolationist,” because he’s sick of coddling our shiftless “allies” while they rip us off and laugh at us behind our back, all the while huddling under the protective wingspan of the American eagle.

    All of this is no doubt reassuring to Wright’s Qatari paymasters, who have a lot to lose if Trump should win the White House and present them with a bill for services rendered.

    But in reading Wright’s list of Trumpist foreign policy heresies, one can’t help but think that the average American would agree with each and every one of The Donald’s complaints about the profligate paternalism involved in maintaining this precious “international order” Wright would have us enforce for free.

    He maintains that “those alliances also work to America’s benefit by providing it with prepositioned forces and regional stability. It would actually cost more to station troops in the United States and have to deploy them overseas in a crisis.”

    But his rationale is a classic example of circular reasoning: he assumes it is our sacred duty to intervene everywhere.

    A “crisis,” for him, is the possibility that the Emir of Qatar will lose his throne, or that the Saudis will one day be confronted with the consequences of their inveterate barbarism.

    Ordinary Americans – i.e. Trump supporters – would consider that turn of events a comeuppance waiting to happen.

    “Tax these wealthy nations,” says Trump, “not America” – a prospect that no doubt horrifies Wright and his foreign sponsors, but delights Americans to no end. Which is precisely why Trumpian nationalism has such resonance this election season.

    In Wright’s view, Trump is not only unduly rude to our alleged “friends,” he is far too friendly to our alleged enemies, i.e. Russia and China.

    Wright admits, parenthetically, that these two pose no threat to the American homeland, but rather to “the US-led order,” i.e. the albatross of our global empire, where – as the Old Right writer Garet Garrett put it – “everything goes out and nothing comes in.”

    Yet Trump’s personal shortcomings are beside the point. The lesson to be taken from this episode is the centrality of foreign policy in the political life of our country.

    The doggedness with which the internationalists are attacking Trump, the nature of their criticisms, and the viciousness of their tactics is an indication of how hard it will be to dislodge them – just as Trump’s popularity shows how eager Americans are to hear someone tell them that we don’t have to continue being the policeman of the world, and that we’re paying through the nose for something that doesn’t benefit us in the least (although it does benefit outfits like the Brookings Institution, which takes in millions from its foreign sponsors).

    No matter how inconsistent and even obnoxious Trump may be – and his crazy plan to deport millions of undocumented immigrants is certainly a noxious fantasy that will never happen no matter who is elected – it would be a mistake to dismiss him as a random anomaly, or as a “fascist” demagogue as some of the more brainless libertarians have done.

    The meaning of Trumpism is that Americans want to rid themselves of the burden of empire: Wright is right about that.

    Trump’s rise augurs a seismic shift in the foreign policy debate in this country, marking the end of the interventionist consensus that dominates both parties.

    And it certainly means the final defeat and humiliation of the neoconservatives, who are busy spewing vitriol at him and his “plebeian” supporters. And that alone is worth whatever price we have to pay for the triumph of Trump.

    For the neocons are the very core of the War Party: their demise as a politically effective force inside the GOP is an event that every person who wants a more peaceful world has been longing for and should celebrate.

    Mr. Antiwar Republican

    By JUSTIN RAIMONDO • March 1, 2010 (excerpt)

    Taft, though not temperamentally a radical, made no bones about his opinion of the New Dealers.

    Many of them, he declared in a radio debate, “have no concern whatever for individual freedom. They are collectivists, like Marx and Lenin and Mussolini. They believe in planned economy; that the government should regulate every detail of industrial and commercial and agricultural life.”

    The New Deal represented a “policy which inevitably leads to bankruptcy and inflation of the currency” and “will not only make the poor people poorer, but it is likely to force a socialism which will utterly deprive them of individual freedom.”

    Those were fighting words that very few in the cowed Republican opposition were willing to speak, although they may have believed them—or feared them—in their hearts.

    Taft rallied the GOP remnants and the beleaguered American Right under the banner of liberty and responsibility at a time when the headwinds of collectivism were blowing mightily from every direction.

    Around him he gathered a movement, which today is known as the Old Right—as distinguished from the “New” Right of William F. Buckley Jr. and National Review, which inherited from Taft and his confrères the mantle of opposition but did little to honor it.

    That movement is now virtually unknown or chiefly remembered by its enemies, who continue to smear it with the ignorant epithets coined by the New Dealers and their propaganda machine.

    Conservatives without historical memory would seem to be a contradiction in terms, yet that is the situation in which we find ourselves some 70 years after Taft’s heyday.

    Conservatives seem to have forgotten their past, which is a pity because the history of their movement is rich with lessons for today, as illustrated by this modest little book.

    As Kirk shows in detailing Taft’s career as leader of the party’s conservative wing, RINO’s have always been with us: “The ‘liberal,’ or anti-Taft, element of the Republican party … acted upon the assumption that the New Deal was irrevocable.”

    While the party rank-and-file might find That Man in the White House detestable and his policies execrable, they insisted that a more accommodating public face was the key to victory at the polls.

    They lost consistently and miserably. Landon, Willkie, and Dewey—they were all defeated betting that principled opposition to Roosevelt’s revolution was incompatible with electoral success.

    Three times the party’s Eastern Establishment blocked Taft from getting the GOP’s presidential nomination.

    It wasn’t until Eisenhower that the moderates scored a victory, but it was the triumph of a popular military commander rather than the party. As Kirk points out, the GOP “steadily declined while Eisenhower held office—declined in Congress, and in state and local elections” and was reduced to a minority in the 1954 congressional contest.

    The decline continued into the 1958 elections, when the party’s congressional caucus shrank to what it had been during the Roosevelt years.

    When Taft died in 1953, one newspaper obituary gave voice to the despair that gripped the Old Right as it faced the smug complacency of the Eisenhower years: “Yes, Bob is gone, and there is no one to take his place,” wrote the publisher of the New Bedford Standard-Times.

    “This alone is a tragedy comparable to the passing of Lincoln. But with Bob Taft goes the Republican Party. In its place is a faceless, slinking thing, bearing only the name Republican, a name indeed which President Eisenhower hardly has mentioned since he was elected under its label.”

    Taft’s entry onto the national scene came too late to stop the collectivist tide on the home front but just in time to oppose FDR’s rush to war.

    Here is where the contemporary “conservative” reader will be shocked to discover that his intellectual and political ancestors held foreign-policy views so far removed from the Bismarckian nationalism of Fox News and the Weekly Standard crowd that the distance can only be measured in light years.

    These views are routinely derided as isolationist, but Taft’s position, as Kirk shows, could today be fairly described as realist: “In international affairs, Taft declared, the New Dealers forever tilted, like so many Quixotes, against windmills. Their objects never well defined even in their own minds, they talked of perpetual peace and the ‘Four Freedoms’; they dreamed of a universal democratic order on the American model; they conjured up stereotypes of nations, and sought to make alliances with—or wars upon—those deceptive simulacra.”

    In describing the past, Kirk seems to have predicted our dreary future.

    Only this time, it is Republicans who are carrying the banner of a “universal democratic order on the American model.”

    And as for conjuring up stereotypes, what else helped motivate the neoconservative crusade to “transform” the Middle East?

    This next is well worth the read, and it gives me hope, along with the movements building on the political scene, that the Old Right (including Southern Democrats) and America First Committee will rise again:


    The Legacy of the America First Committee

    For as long as the cold war lasted, the history of the conservative movement before about 1955 – the history of what I call the Old Right – was for the most part ignored: when they talked about it at all, historians of both the left and the right invariably dismissed it as too politically incorrect to be discussed, let alone taken seriously.

    But the conservative response to the New Deal and the looming prospect of war produced a powerful and very well-organized movement whose active adherents numbered in the millions – and who almost saved our Republic from taking a giant step on the road to Empire.

    The Old Right was a coalition of conservative businessmen, progressive Republicans in Congress; and disillusioned liberals who were alarmed by the militaristic and corporatist direction the New Deal was taking.

    All of these elements had their grievances against FDR – the court-packing controversy, the fascist-style of the National Recovery Act, the massive and unprecedented centralization of power in Washington – but they all came together in the great antiwar movement of the late 1930s, the America First Committee.

    This new antiwar coalition – made up of disaffected liberals, conservative nationalists, Midwestern progressives, and a few scattered libertarians – faced opposition from two powerful groups.

    First there were what Selig Adler calls “the spiritual heirs of Theodore Roosevelt,” who, “in league with the generals and admirals, fought for large military budgets.”

    These Eastern internationalist Republicans, epitomized by Wendell Wilkie, made sure that the GOP would fail to provide any real critique of FDR’s warmongering foreign policy.

    Secondly, there was opposition from the Left, not only from the White House and the dominant Roosevelt wing of the Democratic party, but from the Communists and their fellow travelers, who accounted for a small but influential and increasingly vocal minority. These were really the shock troops of the War Party, who did the dirty work and the hand-to-hand fighting in the battle for hearts and minds.

    It is no exaggeration to say that, during the heyday of the Popular Front, an entire mini-industry grew up around the Communist-inspired campaign to link the anti-interventionist movement – and specifically the America First Committee – to the Nazis.

    This was the strategy of Roosevelt and his far-left allies, as the battle for the soul of a nation commenced, and it is why the great America First leader and writer John T. Flynn called them “The Smear Bund” in a pamphlet of the same name.

    I want to turn, now, to another aspect of this subject, and that is the question of why the America First movement failed in spite of its popular support.

    The majority of the American people didn’t want war: the elites wanted war, and they got it. Why? There were three main reasons for the defeat of the non-interventionists, three areas of weakness in a movement which otherwise had the resources and the level of organization to win.

    The first reason for their failure is that America First failed to even mount a credible effort to take over the Republican party.

    The analysis of the Midwestern progressives – that the “war trust,” an Anglophilic cabal of bankers and mandarins of high finance, was behind the war drive – was vividly dramatized by the victory of Wendell Wilkie at the 1939 Republican national convention, when Wall Street packed the convention with their bought-and-paid-for delegates.

    The defeat of the antiwar Senator Robert A. Taft meant that the America Firsters had lost their last chance to take the White House and cut off the head of the interventionist monster.

    Americans still wanted to stay out of the war, if it was at all possible, but there was no way for them to express this politically, faced as they were with two internationalist candidates.

    The America First Committee, at one of its last national committee meetings before Pearl Harbor, had planned to enter candidates in the upcoming primary elections of both parties, but the turn toward electoral politics came too late.

    The second reason for the failure of America First was that they failed to guard the “back door” to war. Even if the AFC had turned to electoral politics earlier, the method by which Roosevelt finally dragged us, kicking and screaming, into the conflict was a strategy the AFC was woefully unprepared for.

    That strategy entailed provoking the Japanese into attacking the United States in response to an American economic blockade.

    As Wayne G. Cole, the author of the first and only history of the America First movement, points out: “Isolationism took shape as Americans looked across the Atlantic toward Europe: those patterns blurred a bit when they looked westward across the Pacific toward Hawaii, the Philippines, Japan, and China.”

    The third major reason for the failure of the America First Committee was that the isolationists fell victim to the Smear Bund and government repression.

    The campaign against the isolationist movement, coordinated out of the White House and conducted by a plethora of government agencies and private groups working in tandem, was an exercise in character assassination unparalleled in the history of this country.

    At the head of the Smear Bund was the President himself, who did not lose any opportunity to link the AFC with the Nazis and their agents in America.

    Before Pearl Harbor, this campaign was conducted by the professional smear artists, such as John Roy Carlson, the newspaper columnist Walter Winchell, the pro-communist front groups, such as the “Friends of Democracy,” along with the interventionist organizations such as William Allen White’s committee and the Fight for Freedom group.

    Supplementing these efforts were covert operations carried out by British intelligence against the AFC and designed to aid the interventionists.

    The President was eager to get something on the AFC, and he badgered J. Edgar Hoover to investigate the committee’s income in an attempt to link them to the Nazis. FBI agents infiltrated the AFC, attended meetings, examined Committee records, and came up with nothing – much to the President’s chagrin.

    The lesson of history is there to be learned, if and when we are ready and willing to learn it.

    The AFC was smeared relentlessly by the opposition, and yet its chief spokesman and most famous partisan, Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh, was allowed to make a widely publicized address in which he singled out “the Jews” as one of the main organized groups pushing us into war.

    John T. Flynn was outraged, he had done it without anyone vetting the speech in advance, and Norman Thomas quit the committee as a result: the interventionists, for their part, were delighted, and they took full advantage of the opening provided by Lindbergh. The AFC was smeared as being pro-Nazi, and its effectiveness considerably reduced.

    If we can learn from the mistakes of the past, we can build for the future.

    For the legacy of America First is our legacy: it is the heritage of all those who see war as the health of the state, and our policy of global intervention as the main obstacle to the restoration of our old Republic.

    We must know where we’ve been so that we know where we are going: and that is why any study of the AFC is not just an interesting bit of history, but a subject we must master in order to make sense out of what is happening today.

  27. B April 12, 2016 @ 11:03 pm

    The web address just below gives a very long list of all of the locations of the Jewish Holocaust Business Industry in the USA.

    Many or possibly all of these locations are financed by different combinations of Federal, State, and Local governments.

    Possibly a good attorney could bring about a successful class action Supreme Court lawsuit against all of these locations together at one time, because these locations violate laws of government sponsored and government financed partiality in presenting only one narrow viewpoint of the Jewish Holocaust story.

    All of these locations are very irrationally hostile to ever presenting any other different reasonable viewpoints about this Jewish Holocaust story.

  28. Supplement warehouse April 13, 2016 @ 8:49 am

    I hope Trumps brings down the house.

    He is the last fighter out there politically, I believe.

  29. IRONKRAFT April 13, 2016 @ 9:39 am

    With the utmost respect, and as a reader myself, of this excellent site, and similar ones, readers are surely partaking in futile gestures, are they not?

    My reason for this thinking, is that if we wait, pray, and respond accurately enough, God, through his Son, Jesus, will destroy the enemies of truth.

    Why then, do we, and Brother Nathanael, concern ourselves over Jewish rule, when all we need to do, is not wind ourselves up, write angrily, and worry about such evil?

    Failing any worthwhile answer, there is only one task left for us… create a collection of well-trained people, and remove the snake’s head, permanently.

  30. Irene Bonney Faulkes April 13, 2016 @ 4:10 pm

    To Ironkraft:

    As for winding ourselves up – even Jesus overturned the tables of the money changers and with a whip drove the Pharisaic Money Changers, those Jews then (always serving Mammon in enormous greed), out of the Temple.

    We are passionate about driving the present day Jews out of the true temple of the Lord, which does include many believers who are carried away by the delusions, doctrines of demons and witchcraft, springing from that Jewish source of Kabbalism.

    Scientists say now Obama hypnotized the public. Surely that was the case but it was a hypnosis of Satanism.

    The public is being subjected to this all of the time from the news media, politicians and the money lords. The same has occurred with a multitude of Seminarians, Pastors and all of the millions of their deceived followers.

    Yes, it is time men and women of God did become stirred up. The answer for us is spiritual. It involves repentance by many of the above.

    This could be assured if a body of enough people over there, did humbly pray to their God, once the scales have been removed from their eyes. Then their could be hope for many of the remainder – but not all will listen.

    God will answer but maybe not in the way we would hope. ‘Righteousness exalts a nation but sin is a reproach to any people’. The nation is not following righteousness. Its sin is its reproach.

    Even the sin of its leaders in lying continuously as at this night, on CNN, a framed situation is being presented.

    Two Russian SU24 jets did fly low over an American warship but all has not been told. It had to have been because its ‘stealth’ did not work.

    Such an incident did occur a few months back in the Black Sea and although not then totally informing the public, news came out that all of the instruments on the warship were blacked out.

    Russia has done demonstrations of superior technology to the world. She does not desire war as she is demonstrating and neither do millions of our Western people. Why the lies? That is not righteousness.

    As for writing angrily, I do most certainly agree. ‘A soft answer turns away wrath’ and anger does not befit a child of God let alone any of His active servants.

    Someone has to endeavor to enlighten all of these millions, probably about 80 million, of said to be believers in Christ around the world. They are deceived into refusal as to a knowledge of what He said.

    The Apostles Paul and Peter gave severe warning against listening to the Jewish myths of their day, and these have been taken up by the Western Christians of today.

    Jesus Christ Himself called them ‘A den of vipers; children of their father the Devil’. Those words continue to resonate across the centuries to become a loud warning shout.

    Yes, Jesus shouts as He did indeed shout out in John 7:38,39. On that occasion it was a call to ‘Come and drink’.

    It would be blessing to those of the Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Charismatics and Fundamentals who would listen to both of His cries.

    Be warned and then be ‘filled with the Spirit’.

    As to how God will determine to act in judgment against this nation and all others that disobey Him, that is in His hands. ‘Time’, Jesus said ‘is the Father’s’. His will prevails in His time.

    Therefore all of these baseless conjectures, doctrines, imaginations, prophecies around many churches should be thrown out of their windows and from their websites.

    In the final analysis, we do not know the time of any future event.

    We should be following truth, praying, living righteously both personally and nationally according as to what each individual can do. We are to looking heavenwards all of the time.

  31. Irene Bonney Faulkes April 13, 2016 @ 5:30 pm

    A ‘Stop Press’ could be this.

    In Washington D.C., five hundred citizens were arrested for demonstrating for Democracy.

    One hundred of them were older people. ‘The hoary head’ is to be honored and not imprisoned on a Communistic note.

    Is this the freedom loving Republic?

    The four year old is be subjected to sex education. Children have been taught how to commit homosexuality.

    The whoredom and paganism of the Kabbala and Babylonian religions is part and parcel of every-day life.

    From the nation’s capital there are Presidential Candidates who feature as being a Lesbian Criminal, a Jewish Communist, the third, an evil rake and exploiter of women with sex, a liar.

    Of another the ‘Jewish Insider: has this to say:

    ‘Brad Kastan, a prominent Jewish leader in Columbus, Ohio, spoke with Jewish Insider about his relationship with and support of Republican presidential candidate John Kasich.

    ‘In a phone conversation with Jewish Insider on Wednesday, Kastan, a money manager and veteran in the financial services industry, said he and Kasich have been friends since they met at Ohio State University in the ’70s, and that he’s helped Kasich with every campaign since the governor’s successful 1982 run for Congress.

    ”In fact, Kastan said, many of Kasich’s relationships with major Jewish families (Meltons, Schottensteins, Wexners, Ratners, etc.) go back to that 1982 run, in which he defeated incumbent Democrat (and Jew) Bob Shamansky.’

    This leaves Trump friend of Adelsen, the fifth and last.

    Brother Nathanael’s video and comment point out Trump’s popularity with a very large number among the Jews at AIPAC. ‘I love Israel’ – despite its crimes and robberies, stolen identities.

    Who among them will stand for righteousness?

    Listen, you Right Wing Evangelical/Christian Zionists, not one.

  32. Solutions April 13, 2016 @ 6:18 pm


    That site should be copied for reference in case the haters of humanity take it down for wanting to keep their insidious operations more secretive.

  33. Brother Nathanael April 13, 2016 @ 9:59 pm


    All is going as planned.

    My belongings and computer, (and Video equipment), arrived yesterday at my new residence in Priest River Idaho.

    I hope to have everything up and running (still unpacking, perhaps forever!) soon with a brand new Video in a brand new setting. (It’s breathtaking.)

    I’m in a forested setting complete with large pines, firs, as well as aspens in the mountains surrounding this area.

    Once I get settled (whew!) I plan on really ramping up my ministry BOTH online and on the Streets of America with my Street Evangelism. (I have a DC trip in the planning stages for mid-May.)

    Thank you all for your prayers and support!

    +Brother Nathanael
    PO Box 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    PS ALL my mail is being forwarded from Frisco CO for an entire year.

  34. Brother Nathanael April 13, 2016 @ 10:14 pm

    As Regards This Current Video: “Layers Of Jewish Power.”

    I still see bloggers like David Duke, Daily Stormer, etc, touting the deception that ALL Jews are against Trump.

    This simply is NOT true, Jews are TOO crafty for that kind of static tactic.

    Jews deal in devilish layers of “good cop, bad cop” when dealing with anyone they wish to control.

    Now here’s a “layer within a layer” of Jewish power.

    The Wall Street Journal and Fox are owned by the same Jew-bought (Jew-on-his-mother’s side) Rupert Murdoch. (He’s up to his eyeballs in Jew financing of his operations.)

    WSJ trashes Trump while Fox News bolsters him. O’Reilly and Hannity give him good press. Yet, Fox interweaves bolstering with trashing.

    Take CNN whose principal shareholder is dual-citizen of Israel/US, the Jew, Aviv Novo.

    In the opening months CNN leaned toward benign features on Trump. In the past couple of months however it got nasty. Then all of a sudden Anderson Cooper does a “town hall” with Trump which was super-benign and super friendly toward Trump.

    Yes, some will argue, favoring Trump on TV is good business as Trump is a big draw and ratings go up and advertising pours in.

    Yet, (here’s where “inner layers” kicks in), the Jews are showing Trump that they can manipulate and engineer “opinions” and “narrations” about him as they please.

    Just watch.

    Once Trump’s campaign promises are translated into possible actions if he makes it to prez, then the Jew press will plaster him with so much trashing that he’ll be forced to alter his actions, that is, if he really does follow through on his promises.

    +Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Former Jew, Now Orthodox Christian
    I know how Jews work, Duke doesn’t.

  35. Brother Nathanael April 13, 2016 @ 10:53 pm

    MORE On “Jewish Layers”

    I was in front of the AIPAC Conference as it took place last month and at the Verizon Center when Donald Trump gave his speech to 17,000 Jews.


    Also in front of the Conference was a “Dump Trump” protest organized by some leftist Jews with their obnoxious children shouting at the top of their little jew lungs, “Dump Trump!” “Dump Trump!”

    It was a tiny protest, and quite frankly, totally insignificant.

    After all the hacks finished their groveling (including Trump) the Jews began pouring out. They had big, pleased smiles on their faces.

    One AIPAC insider (who took a liking to me) told me, “Trump said exactly what the crowd wanted to hear. He read his speech like a script.”

    AND a “script” it was. His Jew son-in-law, Jared Kushner, of the New Jersey Kushner Real Estate political bloc, WROTE Trump’s script and daddy-in-law touted it VERBATIM.

    I was also told that the anti-Trump rabbis who were planning on getting up from their seats and walking out on Trump engaged in “negotiations” with AIPAC leaders who in turn “negotiated” with Trump.

    The rabbis for the most part, (only one or two got up), stayed seated for the whole performance.

    Now, what did Trump concede to? A sterling speech that would please even the most hardline Zionist?

    An agreement to say that on his first day of his presidency he would move the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem?

    An agreement to say that on his first day, (blah, blah, blah,) he would tear up the Iran deal?

    And agreement to say that the “eternal bond” between Israel and America would see “no daylight?”

    ALL of the above AND more. If Trump becomes prez he’s going to do whatever AIPAC Jews tell him to (and his Jew son-in-law will write the script) and by this, keep the Jew-bought Congress from blackmailing him. +BN

  36. Irene Bonney Faulkes April 14, 2016 @ 12:03 am

    Dear Brother, wonderful things are happening for you for which we are glad and give thanks to God.

    Would that the millions out there would see your videos, read your articles and hear your preaching on the streets.

    There was another person from the U.S.A., a Charismatic, who did hold a cross as he went around the world preaching. I myself heard him in Brisbane, Australia.

    You, however, are an Orthodox Christian.

    Orthodox Christianity goes way back to the first century to Jerusalem, and the Orthodox Churches formed afterwards, have continued in many countries to this day.

    They have known the enmity of the Jews over the centuries. You today, have experienced that the Russian Orthodox Church renounces what the Evangelicals acclaim Jews to be. They are true to the Bible in this.

    All in those early churches were recipients of much tribulation and maryrdoms from the Masoretic Jews and other branches.

    The Masoretic Jews have given the West, that willingly receive them to this day, a contaminated Hebrew text for the Old Testament, used by the British in the King James Bible.

    They began working of their manuscripts around A.D.87. They particularly did not want the Christians spreading a gospel of God manifest in the flesh.

    Our New Testaments likewise bear traces of their interference in some form.

    Let me hasten to say that our Bibles have been sufficient in a glorious way to bring many to salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ with a certain knowledge of truth. I thank God for every part of our Bibles and honor it as the Word of God.

    Nevertheless, the Orthodox Churches have in the main kept the Septuagint Greek of the Old Testament as it had been translated by 72 outstanding Jewish scholars in Alexandria around 200 B.C.

    This was the Bible that the Judeans used, that Jesus quoted and also the Apostles. It was the Old Testament generally read around those periods.

    The Orthodox Churches now have provided this in a great measure for our Western benefit and our scholars are perusing manuscripts and giving us translations. There already has been the Septuagint from the Ancient Orthodox Church (Greek) by their scholars.

    The Orthodox Churches, having been close to Jews at the beginning of Christianity, have been more aware than we have of their terrible intrusion.

    We are indebted to those Churches, the Greek, Syrian, Coptic, Armenian, Serbian, Arabian, Ethiopian, Slavic, Roman and Russian – and any I have missed.

    We Western Christians whose Christianity has followed a different line, should be made aware of this Eastern following of many believers in Christ.

    I have found that the notes at the bottom of each page of the Septuagint of the Orthodox Study Bible are exquisite in their grace and truth – although on a few points I would differ.

    In my view those comments throughout the whole Bible they present far exceed any comments I have read in quite a few of our Western Bibles. And I am sure this is a true judgment.

    Then there are other lost and forgotten books of our Bibles and surely the Jews have been at the back of our not having had access to such. This has been to the detriment of ourselves personally and the whole Western Church.

    Our traditions differ. Our liturgies are dissimilar. They have certain forms of service but then again so do we.

    In all of our combined churches there are to be discovered true believers in the Lord Jesus Christ.

  37. Irene Bonney Faulkes April 14, 2016 @ 12:21 am


    Apparently I got it wrong about the ship. It was close to Kaliningrad Russia. The point was that they should not have been there, 70 miles off. U.S.A. was provoking the Great Bear, who did not respond in a military action that could set off a war.

    There was an American ship a while back, around the Black Sea, whose technology was silenced because the Russian fighter flew there.

    Sorry, dear Brother. But we become so disgusted at the news media here as we see so many lies and misrepresentations about Putin and Russia – even in our own Australia that follows Fox of course, Murdoch having been born Australian.

    I just got it somewhat wrong this time, a rare occurrence. Please forgive me.

  38. Chestergimli April 14, 2016 @ 7:54 am

    When voters elect someone they generally do so upon what a candidate says he/she will do.

    How many of them have followed through? This of course includes the Jews.

    John Kennedy turned on them when he became elected. Just maybe Mr. Trump will do the same to the Jews. And I don’t think the Jews will dare take him out.

    In Kennedy’s time, most U.S. citizens were mild mannered. Not so today. All he has to do is get on the TV and say that our problems are the creation of the Jews.

    That they were behind the killing of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and 9/11. Then if they knock him off, a bunch of dead Jews.

  39. Seek The Truth April 14, 2016 @ 8:12 am

    Can any of you Jews out there answer this question?

    Why was the Federal Reserve Act, the Personal Income Tax Act and the Anti-Defamation League all founded in 1913 about the exact time as the brutal Communist revolution in Russia financed by Jews in New York City?

    Could it be that there is more than one way to “skin a cat”? Instead of using brute force as in Russia, to gently seize control of the monetary system and suppress any criticism of it as another way to enslave people to the Communist Jew ruling elite.

    Do any of you Communist-Zionist-Babylonian Jews want to reveal your 2,500 year old enslaving hand to the Gentiles?

  40. BN For President 2016 April 14, 2016 @ 10:57 am


    Thanks for the great posts.

    Suffice it to say, George Washington, if alive today, would say, “it looks like America took a wrong turn somewhere. Didn’t anybody read my farewell speech?”

  41. Koen April 14, 2016 @ 10:57 am

    Blonds have more fun in getting extinct I guess.

    Luckily not only the Jews know in this era of internet.

    The stupid manipulated gentiles are waking up and face the reality of living under Jewish fascist dictators.

  42. KathJuliane April 14, 2016 @ 12:03 pm

    I’ve been to a number of Blue Angel and Thunderbird air shows, and it seems to me, at times they were much closer to the deck and and the audience than these SU-24s were on their training flights(?).

    Still, very impressive. Notice that the crew weren’t unduly excited, either, which says to me that the SU-24s weren’t in dangerous proximity on approach.

    Russia Insider: Russian Jets Feint a Strafing Run on a US Destroyer.

    Americans Feint Shock and Horror (Video)

    We’re inclined to believe the US Navy is nowhere near as shocked as it’s pretending to be

    Yay. Gotta love fake manufactured horror.

    Russians do a dry strafing run on a US destroyer in the Baltic (as in the sea that Russia’s second city and the old capital of Saint Petersburg lies on) and American military pretends this is such a horrific thing that it makes CNN.

    To demonstrate just how out of order the Russians supposedly were the US Navy did its best impersonation of a 12-year-old girl and took to Youtube and Twitter to cry about it.

    The media took over from there so that the story is now making the rounds – in a high-pitched tone meant to evoke horror an outrage.

    The video shows a pair of Su-24 bombers making an overflight of the US ship at a very low attitude, indicating the planes may have approached the ship undetected by radar. Which may have been a problem for the guided missile destroyer if the jets were carrying anti-ship missiles and there was a war.

    It’s not exactly a friendly act but let’s get a little context here.

    Right now the US is talking up flooding Syria with anti-aircraft weapons to help kill Russian pilots. The US has also decided to deploy an armored brigade to Russia’s border 200 kilometres from downtown Saint Petersburg.

    Weeks ago NATO supreme allied commander wanted to fly spy planes over Russian territory.

    These are just some of the latest ways in which US is showing it thinks of Russia as something like an enemy.

    So what exactly is it that makes the Russian’s reaction other than completely expected?

    Perhaps the Russians thought the US missile destroyer was dangerously close to their second capital?

    I’ve read some claims that the SU24’s buzzed as close as 30 feet from the USS Donald Cook.

    From the stills on USNavy Twitter, one shot, and probably all, looks like it was taken with a telephoto lens, which will foreshorten distances.

    Here are some stills from USNavy Twitter.

    One shot makes the SU24 look like it brushed the bridge with a whisker, but it’s an optical illusion of the telephoto lens.

    All of the passes were in international waters, at standoff distances, and none overflew the ship. I seriously doubt that the SU24 was even as close as 30 feet from the ship.

    Otherwise, surely the camera would have clearly recorded the Russian pilots giving a little salute, waving, if not exhibiting the single-digit universal greeting, to the crew.

    By the way, the USS Donald Cook is the same ship that was in the Black Sea in April, 2014 when an SU24 buzzed it as well, so maybe with her in the Baltic, the Russians just decided to say howdy.

  43. KathJuliane April 14, 2016 @ 1:12 pm

    Some bright news from Syria:

    Ghalawanji: 1.7 million displaced Syrian citizens returned to their areas

    Damascus, SANA – Deputy Prime Minister for Services Affairs, Local Administration Minister Omar Ghalawanji stressed the importance of unifying and coordinating efforts in relief works with the International organization for Immigration (IOM).

    During his meeting with head of the IOM William Lacy Swing and the accompanying delegation, Ghalawanji added that the government is exerting great efforts to bring citizens back to their cities and towns after Syrian Arab Army restores security and stability to these areas.

    Ghalawanji pointed out that about 1.7 million citizens have returned to their original areas of residence after the government repaired and restored infrastructure and public facilities in these areas.

    He noted that the government is still overseeing more than 500 temporary housing centers and providing their occupants’ basic needs, as well as launching new projects for makeshift housing centers in Damascus Countryside and Homs, each of which contains 2,000 residences and are funded entirely by the government.

    Ghalawanji talked about “My Project” program launched by the government in cooperation with the Syria Trust for Development, which aims at giving small loans to needy families to secure their needs and enhance local economies.

    The Minister also reviewed the mechanics of the work performed by the Higher Committee for Relief which he chairs, and the measurements taken to facilitate the access of humanitarian and food convoys to all areas, particularly areas besieged by terrorist organizations.

    Ghalawanji said that the government provided the necessary facilitations for UN agencies and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in cooperation with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC), noting that since the beginning of 2016, 150 joint convoys entered 37 areas which are difficult to reach, which benefited around one million citizens.

    [He added] that tens of billions of Syrian Pounds were paid in compensation to citizens whose homes and shops were damaged with full funding from the Syrian government, in addition to spending more than SYP 35 billion for the restoration and rehabilitation of public facilities.

    He said that the government began making zoning plans a number of areas in the provinces as models for reconstruction projects in the next stage, adding that preparations are under way for a comprehensive project to restore life to the Old City in Homs in cooperation with a number of international organizations.

    In turn, Swing said that his visit to Syria aims at observing the work of the Higher Committee for Relief, as well as assessing the needs on the ground, and discussing mechanisms for enhancing cooperation between the Committee and the IOM.


    President Assad was asked by Western media “After five years of war, what is left of Syria?”

    The Lion of Syria replied, “The people.”


    Citizens vote in People’s Assembly elections in various areas
    ( )

    Vice President al-Attar: Parliamentary elections a memorable event for all Syrians

    Damascus, SANA – Vice President Dr. Najah al-Attar affirmed on Wednesday that the parliamentary elections are a memorable event held in high regard by all Syrians.

    In a statement after casting her vote, al-Attar said that President Bashar al-Assad’s national and genuine stance is to make the Syrians choose candidates who represent them in the best way and work to achieve the Syrians’ goals.

    “We hope that those who bear the nation’s massage and who work to serve their homeland and people will win in the elections,” Dr. al-Attar added.

    The parliamentary elections are very important for the stability of Syria, according to Moscow.

    By the way, Dr. Najah al-Attar is Sunni Muslim woman, and has been Syria’s VP since 2006. She was born in 1933. Her father was among the first Arab nationalist leaders who took part in the 1925-1927 Syrian revolt against the French Mandate of Syria.

    She studied at the University of Damascus, graduating in 1954, and obtained a PhD in Arabic literature from the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom in 1958. She also received a number of certificates then in international relations and in literary and art criticism.


    Dr. Attar is an accomplished translator and started teaching in high schools within Damascus after her return from Scotland, then worked in the Department of Translation of the Syrian Ministry of Culture.

    In 1976, she was appointed as Minister of Culture, serving in that post until 2000. On 23 March 2006, she was appointed as Vice President.

    Thanks Wiki. Now this is what a dignified, well-educated and -travelled career stateswoman acts and speaks like, not some amoral, shrieking, cackling, harpy of a womanoid corporate whore of Jewdom like the Hildebeast.


    Vote casting in People’s Assembly elections were so successful that it was extended five hours due to massive turnout

    Must read: President al-Assad and Mrs. al-Assad vote in People’s Assembly elections (and Syrians use paper ballots, too):

    In a statement to the media as he left the voting center, President al-Assad said “the Syrian people are engaged in a war that has been going on for five years, through which terrorism managed to shed innocent blood and destroy much infrastructure, but it failed in achieving the primary goal it was assigned, which is destroying the principle structure in Syria, meaning the social structure of the national identity.”

    “The Syrian people have been aware during the past years of that point, which is why we saw the citizens’ enthusiasm to participate in all previous constitutional requirements whether they were the presidential elections or the legislative elections.

    “And this is what we see today as well with the wide-scale participation by all elements of society, particularly in the matter of running for the elections, as this year saw an unprecedented number compared to any parliamentary elections in Syria throughout the past decades,” President al-Assad added.

    Russian combat engineers from the International Mine Action Centre of the Russian Armed Forces have cleared about 3000 bombs in 180 hectares (444 acres) from Palmyra, according to Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu.

    Russia’s armed forces have deployed a field hospital to Palmyra. “It’s fitted out with the most advanced medical equipment to operate autonomously for 30 days. If necessary, both the Syrian military and local citizens returning back home can address to that medical installation,” Shoigu said.

  44. Zionien April 14, 2016 @ 3:10 pm

    I’m so happy for you BN+!

    @Seek The Truth – Don’t forget the Loeb shipping Co. 🙁

  45. Patrick J. O'Brien April 14, 2016 @ 3:34 pm

    Dear YA,

    Let me be the first to nominate you for the 2016 Nobel Prize in Poetry.

    God Bless.


  46. KathJuliane April 14, 2016 @ 4:03 pm

    @YA & Patrick J. O’Brian

    I second that nomination!

    God bless you, and God bless us, everyone.

  47. B April 14, 2016 @ 6:53 pm

    Is the separation of Talmud and State included within the laws involving the separation of Church and State in the USA?

    Are there instances where the separation of Talmud and State does not exist in the USA?

  48. Ted Gorsline April 15, 2016 @ 12:55 am

    It is astonishing that Americans are not allowed to know who the names of the shareholders (the people not smoke and mirror corporations) who have the right to counterfeit and print their money.

    That is about as sick as it gets.

  49. KathJuliane April 15, 2016 @ 8:49 am

    What a enlightened nationalist Democratic Republic with a president who lives to serve his people looks like without “Layers of Jewish Power” and its nasty, suckered tentacles everywhere into everything.


    Syria Elections 2016: US-NATO’s Failed Attempt to Deny the Will of the Syrian People – Vanessa Beeley-21 Century Wire

    Yesterday Parliamentary elections were held in Syria. 7000 polling booths were opened across the country. 11,341 candidates were proposed from across Syria with 250 to be elected to Parliament, including a number of female candidates.

    [Around 3,500 candidates competed after more than 7,000 others dropped out. When in US bi-partisan controlled political history has there ever been 3500 candidates running for 535 seats in Congress at the same time? Clearly, Syrians are far more aware of and involved in their national politics than Americans are.

    Especially so after the adoption by popular referendum of the revised Syrian Constitution back in 2012, which abolished the old Article 8 which entrenched the power of the Ba’ath. The new Article 8 reads: “The political system is based on the principle of political pluralism, and rule is only obtained and exercised democratically through voting.”]

    Candidates were spread out as follows: 988 in Damascus, 817 in Damascus countryside, Aleppo 1437, in Aleppo regions 1048, In Idleb 386, in Homs 1800, Hama 700, Lattakia 1653, Tartous 634, Deir Ezzor 311, Hasaka 546, Raqqa 197, Daraa 321, Sweida 263 and in Quneitra 240

    Voting centres opened at 7.30 am and were obliged to extend their sessions by five hours to accommodate the high turn out of voters.

    Some of the women candidates in Syrian Parliamentary elections.

    [Go to link. Not a shrieking, cackling, womanoid harpie among the classy and polished bunch. A number of candidates are young women. And while a number of the women wear the hijab [veil], there are candidates who don’t, representing a religious cross-section of Syria’s people.]

    “The voting centers include over 2,000 centers in Damascus, 17 in Deir Ezzor, 1,047 in Lattakia, 661 in Homs, 347 in Sweida, 741 in Hama, 368 in Hasaka, 816 in Tartous, and 347 in Sweida are receiving voters.

    It should be noted that voting centers were opened in Damascus, Damascus Countryside, Hama, Lattakia, Aleppo, Tartous, Hasaka, and Deir Ezzor to receive voters staying in these provinces who are originally from other areas, namely the provinces of Idleb, Raqqa, Aleppo, Deir Ezzor, and Daraa.” ~ SANA

    So contrary to spurious claims from western governments and media, efforts were made to open the voting to all Syrian civilians including those who have fled terrorists held areas.

    We must also bear in mind that over 90% of IDPs [Internally displaced persons] have fled to Government controlled areas, thus further discrediting claims that these elections are non representative.

    For a full photo report on the Syrian elections: Peoples Assembly Elections 2016

    On an equally positive note, of course ignored in the western and gulf media, 1.7 million of these internally displaced refugees have been able to return home thanks not only to the SAA liberation of whole swathes of Syrian villages and towns from US NATO terrorist occupation but also due to the Syrian Governments laudable efforts to rebuild and restore infrastructure in these areas.

    Small government loans are being given to impoverished families to enable them to re-establish their lives torn apart by the illegal war of aggression that has been waged against Syria by the US, NATO, GCC and Israel for the last five years.

    It is guaranteed that none of these initiatives will be reported in the mainstream media, including the Syrian Higher Committee for Relief’s efforts to facilitate the delivery of Humanitarian aid to the remaining terrorist held civilian areas in Syria.

    As Professor Tim Anderson [who is in Syria to observe the elections as indeed he was in 2014] said:

    “Syrian democracy needs no outside approval. Repeated outside demands that ‘Assad must go’, or that a Washington-approved executive ‘transition government’ be formed, have become meaningless, since the military tide turned in the embattled country’s favour.”

    The Syrian elections proceeded according to the Syrian constitution and law. We see this being enforced in Aleppo for example where it was decided that violations of the voting process had taken place and a re-election was called for.

    UNSC [Security Council] resolution 2254 stated clearly that Syria’s future is in the hands of the Syrians and the Syrians are proving that they are doing just that with little fuss but a lot of enthusiasm and determination to deny foreign intervention in their sovereign affairs.

    The Syrian “Dictator” goes to Vote

    [Notice how paper ballots are used, voters go into a voting booth, come out with a sealed paper ballot, it is dropped into the sealed ballot box, and a fingerprint is used to authenticate the single vote of a registered voter.

    Except for how a person secretly voted on the ballot itself, every step is open to public view.]

    Now lets have a look at the President that western governments and their media minions would have us believe to be a bloodthirsty, butchering dictator as he and his wife Asma head for the polling booths with no security in sight.

    [He and the First Lady certainly drove their own car (or walked) to their neighborhood voting station.]

    ( )

    Compare this if you will, to the protests being held across Britain demanding that David Cameron aka “Dodgy Dave” resign over the Panama papers scandal, the subsequent police clamp down and the manhandling of protestors.

    Perhaps even more laughable in the face of the UK Government’s own deteriorating human rights record at home and abroad, is their statement on the Syrian elections:

    Britain said Damascus’ decision to go ahead with the elections in the war-torn nation, where hundreds of thousands cannot take part, shows “how divorced (the government) is from reality.”

    With homelessness and child poverty reaching Victorian levels in Britain, legal cases pending for criminal arms sales to the genocidal Saudi coalition conducting wholesale slaughter of Yemeni civilians, and recent reports on the British government clandestine assassination programmes, one would be justified in saying the British government has not only divorced itself from reality but from Humanity in every feasible way.

    “Reprieve highlights the fact that Britain conspired in a US-inspired Kill List soon after 9/11. It says quite categorically that “Starting in 2002, working closely with the Americans, Britain had played a leading role in the euphemistic Joint Prioritized Effective List.

    “As with Yemen, the JPEL Kill List was not even limited to a war zone – it spanned over into Pakistan, which was an ally, not an enemy at war.”

    “What this effectively means is that not only has Britain brought back the death penalty it has done so without public or parliamentary consultation, and carried out these deadly deeds regularly without even a basic trial.” ~ Britain’s Secret Assassination Programme
    ( )

    France takes the hippocritic oath.

    France has also hit the deck with cries of illegitimacy regarding the Syrian elections.

    “The idea that there could be elections is not just provocative but totally unrealistic. It would be proof that there are no negotiations or discussions [in Geneva].”~ Francois Hollande

    This statement comes from the man who crossed an executioners palm with silver to secure a multi billion dollar arms deal with Qatar.

    In this photo [see website] Hollande is presenting France’s most prestigious award, the Legion D’Honneur to Saudi interior minister, Muhammed Bin Nayef.

    Bin Nayef is personally responsible for choosing who of the many prisoners in Saudi jails is eligible for execution or crucifixion without trial and usually on trumped up charges.

    So one is once more justified to ask, which leg is Hollande standing on when he denigrates Syrian elections while commending one of the world’s most renowned terrorists on his efforts to combat…terrorism.

    The award for hypocrisy goes to..

    US State Department spokesperson Mark Toner said that the US “would view those elections as not legitimate in the sense that they don’t represent… the will of the Syrian people.

    “So, to hold parliamentary elections now, given the current circumstances, given the current conditions in the country, we believe is at best premature and not representative of the Syrian people,” Toner said.

    Early last week Toner said that “a political process that reflects the desires and will of the Syrian people is what should ultimately decide the future leadership and the future government of Syria.” ~ RT

    Here is the answer of the Syrian people to Mr Toner’s comments:

    Mohammed Ali of Press TV reports from Damascus


    The US, NATO, GCC and Israeli agenda has careered into the brick wall of Syrian resistance, integrity and unity.

    The will of the Syrian people is being listened to by the Syrian government.

    Ideologically and spiritually the Syrian people believe in their political and military victory. The Syrian people have said “no” time and time again to foreign intervention.

    They have endured crippling economic sanctions, invasions by proxy terrorist armies, occupation by mass murderers funded and armed by the US and NATO alliance but their resilience will ensure their self determination against all odds.

    To achieve their objectives in Syria, the US and NATO are reliant upon mercenaries, terrorists, rapists and felons who have no vested interest in victory other than lining their own pockets with drugs and oil revenue.

    The US and NATO agenda in Syria has no basis in law or even sound ideology, it is based upon pure greed and power sustained by corruption and inhumanity.

    It shall fail and Syria will emerge unbowed, stronger and ultimately victorious.

    The Syrian people have redrawn the geopolitical map with strength of will alone. This is the will you should be respecting Mr Toner, there is no other.

    “The Syrian people are engaged in a war that has been going on for five years, through which terrorism managed to shed innocent blood and destroy much infrastructure, but it failed in achieving the primary goal it was assigned, which is destroying the principle structure in Syria, meaning the social structure of the national identity.” ~ President Bashar al Assad.

    ( )

    Notice all the women wearing hijabs in some of the crowd photos, while a minority are bare-headed. What can this mean? Repressed women? Not in Syria.

    The majority Syrian population is Sunni, so the traditional Sunni women wear hijabs. But the younger Sunni women also make it a Syrian cultural-political statement, and that’s why there’s so many.

    Some of the younger women wear hijab, but also wear jeans or pants rather than skirts and dresses. This little noticed fact certainly proves the Manichean lie that the Syrian war was a sectarian war of Sunni vs Shia/Alawi/Druze/Christian, or else why would there be so many Sunni women visibly voting (the Sunni men are also voting of course)?

    And the women do so fashionably, having different styles, and they share styles on social media, and the internet carries a well-established hijab fashion industry.

    Hijab is an Arabic word, not a Mooooslim word, and can also means modest clothing, separation of women in the public sphere, or the veil between man and God. Traditional Arab Christian women like many other Orthodox Christian women are in “hijab”, too, but in different styles from that of Muslims.

    Traditional Orthodoxy, such as in some churches in America and at monasteries when women are permitted to make pilgrimages, require women to dress modestly in long clothing with only hands and face exposed. Orthodox Christian nuns everywhere are in “hijab”. Muslims originally acquired their head-covering and face-veiling traditions from the Roman Orthodox Christian as well as the women of Persia.

    Most people think of the veil solely in terms of Islam, but it is much older. It originated from ancient Indo-European cultures, such as the Hittites, Greeks, Romans and Persians. It was also practiced by the Assyrians and Babylonians.

    Women in medieval Europe dressed more like women in the Muslim world than is generally realized. It was customary, especially for married women, for them to cover their hair with various kinds of headdresses.

    Paintings of urban women in western Europe often show everything covered except the face and hands. It was common to drape the neck and even sometimes the lower face in a wimple. This became part of the classic nun’s garb world-wide that represents the most conservative style of female dress in the Christian world.

    Growing up in an Episcopal church, I remember having to wear a lace veil–Kj

  50. KathJuliane April 15, 2016 @ 9:53 am

    This is clearly a case of Kettle pointing his finger at Pot.

    However, David Ben-Gurion’s observations of into the inherently murderous streak of Jewry historically, and especially modern Israeli Jews, to be tremendously interesting.

    Remember, Jeffrey Goldberg, wearing the clothing of a left Zionist today, was devoted to the murderous thug Kahane, and found his experience as a prison guard over incarcerated Palestinians to be “exotic.”


    Richard Edmondson: Jewish Murderers and What to Do About Them: A Suggestion from David Ben-Gurion

    Recently Sen. Patrick Leahy and ten other members of Congress sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry expressing concern over possible extrajudicial executions by Israeli forces of four Palestinians named in an Amnesty International report.

    The signatories to the letter cite “allegations of gross violations of human rights” (in both Israel and Egypt) and request Kerry to look into the matter with a view toward determining whether a cutoff of US military assistance might be mandated as required under the Leahy Law.

    The letter was dated February 17 but wasn’t made public until late March after a video went viral showing Israeli soldier Elior Azaria firing a gunshot at point blank range into the head of a Palestinian who had been wounded and lay on a street practically motionless.

    What that video clearly shows is an act of murder, but the charges against Azaria have been reduced to manslaughter, and some say even that is nothing more than public relations.

    The video comes at a time when approximately 200 Palestinians have been killed in what the Israelis in most instances have alleged to be stabbing attacks, but in a number of these cases witnesses have refuted the official version of events, and there have been numerous allegations of knives being planted on or near bodies.

    Moreover, the killings didn’t start with the outbreak of the latest intifada.

    In July of last year, Jewish settlers threw petrol bombs into a Palestinian home, killing three members of the Dawabsha family, including an 18-month-old baby, and a few months after that a video surfaced showing Jewish radicals celebrating the attack while stabbing the baby’s photo.

    Four people are presently facing charges in the Dawabsha case, though only one has officially been charged with murder, and even if he is convicted, it’s doubtful he will face more than a couple of years in prison.

    Moreover, the arson attack on the Dawabsha home wasn’t the first time Jews in Israel burned someone to death.

    In the summer of 2014, Jewish settlers kidnapped [and murdered] 16-year-old Muhammad Abu Khdeir off the street and set him on fire after forcing him to swallow gasoline.

    It would require a diseased mind to do that to anyone, much less a 16-year-old kid who had done nothing to harm the attackers.

    Clearly there is a problem in Israel with murderers running rampant, but this is nothing new. It has been a problem ever since the the Jewish state has been in existence–something recognized by no less than David Ben-Gurion.

    Moreover, Ben-Gurion put forth a proposal for stemming the tide of butchery, though actually his solution was not that novel or new.

    Simply put, he advocated imposing the death penalty.

    Only this, he reasoned, would deter Jews from the gratuitous killing of Arabs. The former prime minister’s thoughts on the matter were expressed in a cabinet meeting in 1951, and were the subject of a recent article in Haaretz.

    “I’m not the justice minister, I’m not the police minister and I don’t know all criminal acts committed here, but as defense minister I know some of the crimes, and I must say the situation is frightening in two areas: 1) acts of murder and 2) acts of rape,” he said.

    Ben-Gurion at the time was serving simultaneously as prime minister and as defense minister, and the subject up for discussion that day was whether or not to abolish the death penalty–a statute still left on the books from the years of the British mandate.

    Most of those present were in favor of abolishing it. Ben-Gurion and a few others were opposed.

    “In general, those who have guns use them,” Ben-Gurion asserted, adding that some Israelis “think Jews are people but Arabs aren’t, so you can do anything to them.

    “And some think it’s a mitzvah to kill Arabs, and that everything the government says against murdering Arabs isn’t serious, that it’s just a pretense that killing Arabs is forbidden, but in fact, it’s a blessing because there will be fewer Arabs here. As long as they think that, the murders won’t stop.”

    Ben-Gurion said he, too, would prefer fewer Arabs, but not at the price of murder.

    “Abolishing the death penalty will increase bloodshed,” he warned, especially between Jews and Arabs. “Soon, we won’t be able to show our faces to the world. Jews meet an Arab and murder him.”

    Keep in mind Ben-Gurion’s comment about the “mitzvah to kill Arabs” and the Israelis who regard Arabs as less than human.

    One who sided with Ben-Gurion on the death penalty debate was Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett, but for the latter it was a complete reversal from a previous position he had taken on the issue.

    When the capital punishment issue first had come up in 1949, Sharett had been in favor of abolishing it. But by 1951, Sharett had had a complete change of heart.

    “With great regret I’ve become convinced that abolishing the death penalty is inconceivable,” he announced, noting that even countries “which are immeasurably more humane than we are – I’ve spent years there and I live here – maintain the death penalty.”

    The main reason for his U-turn, however, was “the crimes that have happened and are happening week after week, especially in the army,” including some that weren’t public knowledge.

    Sociopaths might not be deterred by the death penalty, Sharett admitted, “but that Jewish chap who kills two Arabs he met on the road, I’m not willing to say, without trying it first, that he’s a killer by nature and won’t fear the death penalty.”

    Some Jews, Sharett said, think “every Arab is a dog, a wild dog that it’s a mitzvah to kill.”

    And “to save them from killing human beings, it’s a mitzvah to have the death penalty here. As long as we don’t have it, these murders will continue, and we’ll be held accountable, and it will create moral corruption here…”

    Once again we have a reference to Jews regarding Arabs as subhuman, and note also Sharett’s comment about “sociopaths” as well as his remark about countries “which are immeasurably more humane than we are.”

    It is as if Sharett is conceding that Jews by nature are not especially humane–you could almost read that into the quote.

    In any event, the death penalty in Israel was officially abolished in 1954.

    The world just a few days ago marked the 68th anniversary of the Deir Yassin Massacre.

    On April 9, 1948 members of the Ergun and Stern Gang terrorist groups invaded the village of Deir Yassin at about 3 a.m. and began slaughtering its inhabitants.

    When they met with resistance from the villagers, they put out a call for help to the Haganah (which later became known as the “Israeli Defense Forces”), which indeed responded to the call. By the time it was over, some 250-360 Palestinians lay dead.

    And Deir Yassin has been repeated in one form or another down through the years, including in Gaza which seems to get a thunderous torrent of murder and mayhem unleashed upon it every other year or so.

    It is kind of ironic that Sharett and Ben-Gurion, as we can see now, shared at least one thing in common with Adolph Hitler–all three advocated the death penalty for Jews.

    [Sadly, Holocaustianity infects everyone’s thinking, if they don’t delve for authentic and accurate history. Hitler is the boogeyman because he wanted to expel Jewry.

    There was never a death penalty for Jews as Jews unless they committed a capital crime.

    So far as I know, no death penalty was ever enacted for race-mixing after the Nuremberg Laws came into effect, although there were harsh prison and penitentiary punishments, despite the stance of hard-core NS demanding the death penalty for extreme cases proposed in early draft legislation.]

    The reason I invoke Hitler’s name is because history, and particularly Jewish history, has a tendency to run in cycles (109 expulsions since the year 250 A.D.), and Israel’s ability to flaunt its barbaric behavior, while at the same time continuing to receive support from Western politicians, simply underscores in people’s minds the extent to which Jews hold power over them.

    Politicians such as Hillary Clinton may think they’re doing a service to American Jews by pandering to AIPAC and pledging their eternal fealty to Israel, but in reality they may be accomplishing just the opposite.

    A good many of America’s problems right now are attributable to bankers and media owners, and the fact that Jews dominate in both industries (“and so what if we do?” wrote one rather famously) is not being lost on increasing numbers of people.

    In other words, the anger is spreading outward. It is no longer confined simply to “Israel” or its “lobbies.” It is spreading outward–to encompass Jews in general.

    You don’t see it so much in public spaces, but on the Internet it is plainly visible. And probably for this reason the Department of Homeland Security has awarded more than 90 percent of its grants to Jewish organizations–a gesture which may increase security at a few synagogues and community centers but which will also have a tendency to stoke the public anger even further.

    For this and other reasons, it might be well, for those with the capability of thinking rationally, to actually go ahead and invoke the Leahy Law at this time and cut off military aid to Israel.

    Doing so would act as an escape valve; it would help defuse some of the public anger.

    And for whatever it’s worth, I think David Ben-Gurion would approve, for it might well impress upon the Israelis that there are consequences to actions–something they don’t presently seem to understand.

    Invoking the Leahy Law would have other bonuses as well. A cutoff of military aid would reduce Israel’s ability to wreak havoc in the Middle East, and reducing its capacity for creating havoc will make for a saner world than we have at present.

    It will not, of course, cleanse the collective Jewish psyche of its supremacist tendencies, its murderous urges, or its inclinations to view others as subhuman.

    How that may ever be achieved, I do not know. It may well require an act of God.

  51. Hoff April 15, 2016 @ 12:39 pm

    ”The New York Times covered the issue extensively — 145 articles in 1915 alone by one count — with headlines like “Appeal to Turkey to Stop Massacres.”

    The Times described the actions against the Armenians as “systematic,” “authorized, and “organized by the government.”

    The American ambassador, Henry Morganthau Sr., was also outspoken.

    In his memoirs, the ambassador would write: “When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well, and in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact.””

  52. Hoff April 15, 2016 @ 12:45 pm

    All well Dear +BN?

  53. Hoff April 15, 2016 @ 12:46 pm

    The Greek genocide, part of which is known as the Pontic genocide, was the systematic ethnic cleansing of the Christian Ottoman Greek population from its historic homeland in Anatolia during World War I and its aftermath (1914–22).[1]

    It was instigated by the government of the Ottoman Empire against the Greek population of the Empire and it included massacres, forced deportations involving death marches, summary expulsions, arbitrary execution, and the destruction of Christian Orthodox cultural, historical, and religious monuments.[2]

    According to various sources, several hundred thousand Ottoman Greeks died during this period.[3”

  54. Brother Nathanael April 15, 2016 @ 4:04 pm


    All is well, just trying to get a Video text and format ready to film soon. (Still haven’t set up my computer and video venues yet, still working on borrowed lap top.)

    Will give expanded Update later tonight. +bn

  55. Seek The Truth April 15, 2016 @ 4:57 pm

    This is a message for all you JFK assassination conspiracy theorists especially the ones that are planning to write books.

    Please try to ignore the 35,000 pound pachyderm sitting in the middle of the room. He wants you to pretend he’s not there!

    Don’t ever use the phrase “Israeli Mossad”. Instead, use the phrases “Khazarian mafia”, “Italian-Sicilian mafia”, “CIA rogues”, “Johnson oil men”, “Cuban exiles”, “Bush crime cabal” etc.

    That way you don’t have to worry about getting JFKed if you start becoming too nosy and start sticking your nose up his ear!

  56. Brother Nathanael April 15, 2016 @ 8:52 pm

    My MOVE To New LocationUpdate!

    Well here I am in my new location, Priest River, Idaho.

    I am living in a picturesque lot of 12 acres of green, fertile soil, and tall pines and firs.

    My sense is that I’m at the precipice of new beginnings, new possibilities, and new horizons.

    I’m in a safe place now where solitude and quiet is begetting a calm spirit that will lead to clarity and good decision making.

    This, coupled with the medicine of patience, will lead to success in my divinely-appointed mission.

    Am I being presumptuous? I think not.

    The proud have forged lies against me but it is Christ’s holy will that I seek.

    “In the multitude of counselors there is safety,” said the wise Solomon.

    I have sought out (as well as those Christ has led to cross my path), wise counselors so as to ascertain what God’s will is for my life regarding my calling.

    All to a man (and to a woman) have affirmed most assuredly that I have been called to this ministry, both online and especially on the Streets.

    Ironically, those who say I “must cease and desist” are either laypeople or some former-evangelical Orthodox priests. They constantly badger the Bishops of my Church to put a gag in my mouth and send me back to the monastery.

    Yet those who ARE in monasteries, including monks and hiermonks, are emphatic that I MUST CONTINUE my public ministry.

    That said, be assured that every step I take, every move I make, is being watched over and guided by trustworthy Spiritual advisers and the Holy Spirit Himself.

    I don’t make a move without them.

    +Brother Nathanael @

    My NEW Mailing Address:
    Brother Nathanael Foundation/Brother Nathanael (Kapner)
    PO Box 547
    Priest River ID 83856

    (I will STILL be using my Frisco CO PO Box for the entire year with my mail being forwarded to my new POB: Box 547, Priest River, Idaho 83856)

  57. hugo April 16, 2016 @ 7:01 am

    The KEY LAYER OF THEIR POWER is the ability to create money out of THIN AIR.

    Money is only meant to be a medium of exchange. Instead of exchanging one cow for 2 sheep you exchange currency.

    It follows that currency should be created by the government and in order to retain its value should be proportional to the value of GDP and should only be expanded in proportion to economic growth.

    Instead we have granted a group of private individuals a license to create this medium of exchange out of THIN AIR and pass it onto the rest of us as INTEREST PAYING DEBT.

    In the case of individuals there is full capital repayment plus interest whereas in the case of government there is no capital repayment and interest is perpetual.

    So whilst the rest of us must produce goods (e.g. cars) and services to earn money these swindlers just create it out of THIN AIR. Nice one!

    Can you imagine how much power you would accumulate over a period of 200 years if someone gave you a license to do this?

    It should come as no surprise then to learn that 30% of the of the US money supply is created by the PRIVATELY OWNED Federal Reserve with the other 70% created via the scam known as fractional reserve banking.

    So you can see why Jewish oligarchs politically support any agenda that creates government deficits (e.g. endless wars for Israel/societal collapse via cultural Marxism/big spending social programs to repair the societal collapse they cause)—-since the resulting deficits will be funded with money created out of THIN AIR but repaid by the rest of us with money earned through the production of real goods and services!

    The only solution is (1) end this system and (2) trace and confiscate all wealth related to these people going back 200 years. If you do not do (2) then you leave them with sufficient wealth/power to bring back the old system.

  58. Matt Wayne April 17, 2016 @ 8:56 am

    The Jews, the great prostitute that sits over the peoples, multitudes, nations and languages, and with whom the kings of the earth commit adultery. Rev. 17-18. Ezekiel 16, 23.

    The Jews have gained this control through, among other things, their racial solidarity, and by rarely breaking ranks. By fraud and deceit.

    Yet the Jews seek to paint all white people or white nations that want to hold to their white Christian country as evil racist.

    The Jews fearing the only people that can stop their ultimate plan. This should be apparent to the simplest of minds.

    The Jews may or may not be successful in their plight to subjugate and genocide the white nations, but in the end Jesus Christ, the Rock not made by human hands, will crush the Jews, and there’ll be nothing left of the the Jews.

  59. paz querciosimino April 21, 2016 @ 11:45 am

    In Him, With Him, Through Him.

    We love you.

    Money is in the mail.

    “If you wish to transform society, transform yourself.” — Saint Francis of Assisi

  60. Hoff April 24, 2016 @ 5:16 pm

    Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett, and the book banned for promoting “miscegenation” in Israel.

    At the same time, the organized Jewish lobby in America and Europe —which fanatically supports Israel—demands of Europeans that they accept miscegenation and mixed marriages in order not to be “racist.”

  61. csng May 1, 2016 @ 12:36 pm

    Brother Nat,

    Do you think China will change sides to the Jews instead of the alliance with Russia?

    Reasons are China is an atheist Nation and loves money. For the love of money are evil.

    The Chinese have the ace card and whoeverside the country backs will dominate.

    Please comment, Bro Nat.


Leave a comment