Real Money And The Jewish Dialectic
By Brother Nathanael Kapner
Karl Marx is the father of communism.
He wrote about the Hegelian dialectic—a conflict between thesis and antithesis that resolves in synthesis.
The dialectic embodies the spirit of the Jewish Talmud that what appears to be contradictory has a hidden resolution.
Keep focusing on some conflict and attention is pulled from the real solution.
Enter the Jewish capitalists, Warburg and Schiff, who funded the Communist revolution.
Bolsheviks were Jews. But isn’t there a conflict between capitalism and communism?
Not for the Jews. It’s kabuki theater for the ‘goyim’ to distract them from seeing who’s really pulling the strings. Jews manage conflicts like people breathe air.
Grasp this and you’ll stop thinking of Democrats and Republicans as two opposing parties.
What flavor of Jewish ‘dialectic’ do you want?
Control both sides of the war and you’ll always win.
Jews control money-creation too.
“Das Kapital” and “Wealth of Nations” say nothing about how money is created.
That’s the Jewish dialectic at work, hiding the real issue.
But if they do talk about money, it’s to bamboozle you.
[Clip: “As we progress through this series, you’ll learn that national currencies are really a tool used by the government and the financial sector to leach away your time and your freedom by stealing your purchasing power.”]
Look. Aristotle said that money is determined by government law, not by intrinsic value.
Sovereign governments create money by fiat backed by law. Aristotle’s word for money, “nomisma,” is derived from the word law, “nomos.”
Only fiat money can sustain an expanded society…and the Jewish money masters know this.
That’s why they promote ‘metalism’ (the false idea that money must have intrinsic value) in order to confuse you.
The way to tell the best money is to see what the Jews hate most. It’s not gold.
[Clip: “Hi everybody, this is Peter Schiff from Euro Pacific Precious Metals and I am holding in my hand the most innovative precious metals product that I’ve ever seen. I can take this, a bar of gold, and just put it here in my wallet with my other credit cards and I can close it up, put it in my pocket and I’ve got $2,500 dollars in my wallet. And, I can spend as little as $50 dollars’ worth at a time.”]
Ludicrous….I mean comical! Try giving Schiff’s little strip to the checkout lady at Krogers and just watch the expression on her face.
Now comes the ‘intrinsic’ bamboozle.
[Clip: “Here’s a $50 Federal Reserve note. Today they both have the same purchasing power. But I know that this little gram has real intrinsic value and it represents all the effort required to mine it. What about this $50? Nothing. The Fed runs them off the printing press, it doesn’t cost much, it doesn’t matter what number they put on the bill. Here’s a $100 dollar bill. There’s no real difference between the $100 and the $50, they’re the same size.”]
Oh, but it DOES matter what number they put on the bill. I’ll take a $100 any day over a $50.
This ‘intrinsic’ smokescreen is all about hiding the real money that Jewry hates: government-created fiat money.
Adam Smith, the father of Capitalism, also hid real money for the Bank of England.
He claimed that it was necessary to affix a public stamp on certain metals used to purchase goods. Yet the Bank predominantly used fiat with only a mix of metal.
Marx hardly talked about money either and when he did he had the same ‘metalist’ idea.
This is the Talmudic dialectic. The thesis is capitalism. The antithesis is communism. The synthesis is Jewish control like fiat money created by Jews lent to the government AT INTEREST.
That’s the real problem. The power of fiat in the hands of the Jews…NOT Aristotle’s “government and law.”
But here’s some good news:
Last month, Ben Dyson, founder of “Positive Money,” succeeded in opening a debate on money creation in the UK Parliament.
[Clip: “The methods of money production in society today are profoundly corrupting in ways which would matter to everyone if they were clearly understood. The essence of this debate is who should be allowed to create money, how, and at whose risk. Positive Money, a British campaign group, are campaigning for the complete nationalization of money production.”]
This is a monumental break in Jewish control right smack in the face of The Rothschild-ruled The City of London.
The Jews don’t have everything sewed up.
If we get organized, we can take the money power back.
Astoundingly, this was all pre-conceived, not simply by the express Word of God in the Bible.
The other team has been guided by centuries programatically. This suggests to me they have been in active and explicit communications with Satan for centuries if not millennia.
Why was ‘societal expansion’ viewed as a necessary and prudent way forward? They had the power already. Why expand the denominator?
I have a theory. Broadly-held wealth (prosperity) was allowed (temporarily) in order to unleash human ingenuity and technological progress. Who could argue that, today, this mass wealth effect is being gathered back in earnest?
In 2008, Main Street recapitalized Wall Street banks, for example. Wealth distribution is clearly headed back upwards. We are on the cusp of trans-humanism, arguably the terminus of undiluted human advance.
Our elite plans to live forever in the hearts of machines. Moreover they do not plan to share this ‘privilege’.
Of course the machines, not to mention God, may have plans of their own.
What are those nice Jewish boys doing at Google with all those weird black box projects?
James Galbraith (or was it Michael Hudson?) said that all economies are planned, the question is whether they are planned by the government for the people or by the capitalists for their own gain, especially the bankers who produce nothing but money for themselves and debt for everyone else.
Ellen Brown’s book The Public Bank Solution says that economic miracles take place when banks are nationalized and government controls the life-blood of the economy, credit, for the good of the nation.
PhD in economics and true populist Vladimir Putin has this down–running the country for the people.
I strikingly disagree that fiat, debt-based money is the money the Jews hate.
They invented fractional-reserve banking in northern Italy in the 15th century, and that idea was transferred to England in 1694 with the institution of the Bank of England.
In such a fiat system currency is legally created as debt and debt only via signatures on promissory notes. The bankers then controlled the issuance of a nation’s currency. The creation of such money was only held in check by the international gold standard until 1971, when Richard Nixon abrogated the Bretton Woods agreement to redeem dollars for gold at $35 per ounce.
Frankly, even a fiat money that is completely controlled by governments and not issued in this special arrangement that banks have presently with the central governments of the world would not be reassuring, given the shenanigans of a ruling political class.
Money arose as an archetype of inherent value as an exchange medium in the river basin civilizations of the world, and caused a flowering of the division of labor.
To honor fiat currency as money reveals a profound lack of understanding of the value of man’s productivity and transfers control of a society to the very unproductive money changers you rail against, Brother Nathaniel, whether those money changers are Jews, or corrupt politicians.
I’ll stick with gold or silver, or any other money that might arise spontaneously as the result of people’s efforts to exchange VALUE!
+BN did not say Jews hate fiat debt money. Just the opposite. He said Jew-issued, debt-based government fiat money is the dialectical synthesis the Jews love and promote.
What they hate and vilify is debt-free fiat money issued by governments. Do you see the difference between the two kinds of government fiat money?
+BN encourages you personally to stick with gold and silver and buy some of those little gold bars from Schiff and see if you can find any stores that think they are money. I bet you are smart enough not to fall for it. Do your deeds back your words?
Apparently you agree with +BN in opposing fractional reserve fiat. All gold standard systems have always been fractional reserve, largely fiat. Maybe you did not know that.
The few times non-fractional reserve gold standards of government money were tried ended immediately in deep recession. Apparently you don’t know this.
You appear to oppose all fiat systems. But a non-fiat system has never existed for hundreds of years.
Many people think they have solutions, but you have no historical test cases to show where your non-fractional reserve gold standard theories work. In contrast, there are a number of historical test cases where government fiat money worked well.
When we find our theories clashing with the historical facts, we change our theories to meet the facts.
No government has been on a gold standard system without fractional reserve.
You can’t stick with gold and silver except in a fantasy world. Stores don’t take it. They don’t want it. It does not facilitate commerce.
They don’t know if it’s fake. Have you bought some of those little $50 gram bars from Schiff? Have you tried to spend them? No. You know enough not to buy them and try to spend them at ordinary stores.
I am NOT looking for an argument, I seek accuracy.
The “interest free, debt free, CONstitutional” money movement has been around for a long time.
First and foremost, this movement accomplishes nothing except changing the names of our masters - You don’t like what the jews are doing to us? Think you’d like it better if the Jewish owned and controlled government would do it to us?
Understand, the problem isn’t WHO is doing it, it is WHAT they are doing, and it is the WHAT that needs our attention.
The CONstitution does not give anyone the power to create “money.” It gave the CONgress the power to COIN money, but never print or create “money” - Two impossibilities. Why? Because money is psychological and can exist only in the mind - IF you Think you have money and can get a banker to agree, then you have it?
There are only 2 monetary systems, if you know a third, please let me know:
1) BARTER - Wherein you use something - SOME THING as the money. You appear to dislike gold/silver in coin form - fine, use frozen orange juice, just use some THING.
2) CREDIT - wherein nothing - NO THING is used as the money. The system we have today, that Hitler had and Russia has - worldwide credit is debt is monetized debt is money.
Why wouldn’t you want the people to “create” the “money” they use by using the some THING they produce to serve AS THE money?
If the government created money, how much would they create? Who would decide? Who would get it? How would they get it? Smell a Jew here yet?
You advocate a CREDIT system wherein the principal doesn’t exist except in record keeping. What, pray tell, is the interest on a non-existing principal all about?
I’m your friend, and you simply haven’t grasped what it is you are saying, and you must understand these points - in a CREDIT system:
1) Governments (nor anyone else spend no money);
2) Governments collect no money, ie: “taxes” (what would you pay them with?)
3) Banks lend no money;
4) Endless wars are NOT fought for profits - why would you do anything for profit when you have the power to create money?
Think about it - Why would governments spend money when they get everything with credit?
“And, you recall, our systems works only with credit.” FRB of New York, KEEPING OUR MONEY HEALTHY.
I’m sorry, the Jews do not fear what you advocate - they’d love it and many like yourself would be their contented slave.
If you want the Jews to fear your message, start with abolishing all legal tender laws.
The beginning of a good discussion on money, but only Dennis Spain (as I recall) got to the crux of the matter: Value.
What gives money its value in the first place?
Its obviously human labor which gives money value, which is inherent in the case of precious metals but requires discipline in the case of fiat money (Money and currency are not the same thing, by the way - money is only an abstraction while currency is a tangible portion of money which facilitates a small portion of trade).
It matters what one has to do to obtain money. Working - producing something of value - is what gives money its value.
Obtaining money without working, whether central banker or politician is what steals value from money from the whole populace. Most of the terminology of economists is designed to obscure this obvious fact.
I would like to include the concept of competitive currencies.
Alongside a national currency that the government would be forced to use, the people would be free to use other currencies, free from regulation. This way the market would keep the government money honest.
With other currencies I mean anything like gold coins, casino chips, bitcoins etcetera.
I think that government created fiat money is certainly better than what we have now, but in my conscience I know that fiat money is wrong. There must be value involved as well as production / labor value.
One thing for sure, this discussion certainly throws light on the Austrian School, or Libertarian economics. I like to listen to Peter Schiff because he expresses himself clearly and even I can understand what he is saying.
However, I am steeped in Catholic social teaching, Rerum Novarum and all that stuff, and I can easily see the flaws in his reasoning.
I think that whole “free market” drivel has never ever worked at any time or place in world history.
Libertarian economics is internationalist and somewhat anarchist. They have no concern for a country’s integrity as a sovereign nation.
They certain have a strange understanding of what is the “common good” because they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the worth of the individual human with an eternal soul.
The Catholic Church has never endorsed capitalism and what we have today, crony capitalism, is just that much worse than the fundamentally wrong capitalistic philosophy. “Capitalism is state-sponsored usury.” (Heinrich Pesch, SJ) Usury, correctly defined, is a mortal sin.
P.S. Ellen Brown said there is some new international banking rule that allows banks to steal deposits and to wipe out public pension funds.
New Rules: Cyprus-style Bail-ins to Take Deposits and Pensions
At present U.S.G. deficits are funded through the purchase of Government bonds (=I.O.U.) by the PRIVATELY OWNED Federal Reserve with money they create out of THIN AIR.
The Federal Reserve then demands the taxpayer pay them interest on this fictitious loan –a whopping US$400 billion in 2010 alone–money that could have been better utilized on schools, hospitals etc. or alternatively returned to the taxpayer via tax cuts!
Therefore the solution is:
1) Nationalize money creation (i.e. the banking system) meaning we finance our own deficits with money we (NOT the banks) create out of THIN AIR. The national debt will stop growing overnight (since you cannot owe money to yourself) although inflation will still remain.
2) No compensation payable to the majority shareholders of these banking institutions since otherwise we will be rewarding swindlers.
3) All wealth accumulated by these swindlers over 150 years (through a license to create money out of THIN AIR) to be confiscated and returned to their victims — the general public. This is far preferable to the divide and conquer Marxism (now called equality) that these banking elites have historically financed and advocated for the rest of us.
The fundamental problem = giving a few private individuals a license to create money out of THIN AIR and then charging it as debt to the rest of us.
Tying the money supply into the supply of gold will just put huge profits into the hands of the same swindlers since the likelihood is they already own most of the world’s gold supply in anticipation of this development.
You offer a pretty doctrinaire recitation. The Gold Standard however would be catastrophically deflationary.
In order to compensate the vastly complex division of labor (over a planet of 7 billion people), some elastic storehouse of value has to be devised. Better that this currency be maintained and directed by a democratically answerable government than by a secretive, private consortium.
BN’s point is well-taken. There is nothing intrinsic of this Earth. Metalism is materialism and false idolatry.
However, this particular dialectic is so utterly sewn up and controlled, that I, unlike BN, give the prospects for usurpation at nil. With the current collapse in energy prices, Russia and Iran become far more vulnerable to the encircling power of Western finance.
The ravenous beast of Usury is poised to swallow the last remaining chunks of the planet. Is it possible to come to Christianity on macro-economic grounds? I’m thinking, in my case, yes!
Roughly paraphrasing Tertullian, ‘it’s because the current crisis is so counter-intuitive, that the Christian message must be true.’
In the UK the annual Government deficit or P.S.B.R. (meaning the excess of expenditure over taxes raised) was £10-20 billion maximum assuming you had a bad government (and was often in credit).
In 2008 came the banking crisis. The government recapitalized the banks using money borrowed from the banks to prevent a collapse of the banking system.
The P.S.B.R. shot up to £160 billion per year which figure analysts say cannot be paid off ever without a massive devaluation of the purchasing power of money!
This debt is currently being paid off NOT by the banks (as one would expect) but by the taxpayer through increased taxes and cuts in public services!
As a measure of their gratitude the banks continue to pay themselves huge bonuses for imaginary profits earned on their fictitious economic activity.
An ex-chancellor of the Exchequer — Nigel Lawson — told a TV station that the government should have let the banks collapse whilst guaranteeing the funds of depositors. The exact opposite is now being done in Cyprus where the banks have been kept alive by seizing the funds contained in private accounts!
The sooner we end the power of these banks by repatriating all the money they owe us the better.
It is high time these swindlers were forced to take on real jobs building something of value in exchange for money instead of being given a license to print money out of thin air.
You can’t breath it, eat it, drink it, wear it. Its value has always been set by exciting the masses over it, much like so-called celebrities.
This has always been the deceptive option to fiat money (paper or otherwise). This is Jews controlling both sides of an argument, just like controlling both sides of a debate or war - something the Jews have always been masters of.
Reflections of the past show how the financial game plan of die Juden stays the same, which is debt slavery based on usury. Die Juden have been usurers since the dawn of time.
Circa 1927 Alfred Rosenberg wrote the below in a booklet honoring Dietrich Ekhart titled, “Dietrich Ekart-A German Life.”
“The interest slavery of all folks is today nearly perfected. There is no land today that does not owe its bankers more money than earlier, but these lands already today can no loinger think about paying all the debt.
After decades of forced labor, the debt will not be less, rather greater. Dietrich Eckhart as well turned against this immoral system of sujugating all folkish self-reflection and self-determination and put his whole energy into the service of the “breaking of the interest servitude.”
When die Juden run your banking system, the more things change, the more they stay the same.
“Ponzi: Treasury Issues $1T in New Debt in 8 Weeks—To Pay Old Debt”
Most monetary reformers, including +BN, promote local currencies and mutual credit, bit coins, and private currencies like gold.
In fact these already exist and are flourishing. However all private and local currencies will always only be a tiny fraction of government currency in the world.
Government fiat currency is the oil required to make the wheels of commerce turn in a world of 6 billion people. Huge quantities of it. Without it world trade comes quickly to a screeching halt into recession and depression.
Why is government fiat money more creditworthy and desirable than gold? Because it is backed by something more valuable than gold: taxes.
There are a few people who would prefer gold over dollars, but not many, because dollars spend easily and gold does not. The gold certificates from bullion banks hardly function as money at all because no one will take them in trade.
People are not being truthful when they pretend that gold certificates are backed by real value and government fiat money is not.
Only government can raise taxes. Financial markets will always rate taxable dollars higher than gold because it is a stream of income, like a job income is security for credit cards.
I like the way you include both government issued fiat currency and local and private currencies as money. Still, it is important to understand the proportions and potentials.
Talk of metal or local currencies is fine, but the idea some of the critics of +BN’s proposal have of private or metal money actually replacing government fiat money is just gullible wishful thinking for uninformed people who have listened to too much Jewish propaganda from the metalists like Lew Rockell et all.
No such systems have existed for hundreds of years. They have no proven record in an industrial society.
For realistic seekers of a way to deprive Jews of their lock on money creation and thus everything else, the only question is, should the Jews issue government fiat money or should we?
Hi Brother Nate…thanks for enlightening us. In simple terms, we shouldn’t miss your main points.
That being our national currency should be about benefitting the nation (we the people), not diminishing then ultimately enslaving the nation, as we already are!
IMO your statement below is the crux of your argument! Also, as mentioned time and again by many, this seems to answer New Testament reference to “magik money” created by the jewish cabal.
“That’s the Jewish dialectic at work, hiding the real issue.
But if they do talk about money, it’s to bamboozle you.
[Clip: “As we progress through this series, you’ll learn that national currencies are really a tool used by the government and the financial sector to leach away your time and your freedom by stealing your purchasing power.”]
Leachining away my time and my freedom by stealing away my purchasing power.
I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m sick of the “law of diminishing returns.” The harder I work, the less I keep due to outright fraud/theft by the banking cabal at top of the strata and endless taxation at the bottom of the strata.
“If we get organized, we can take the money power back.”
There lies the difficulty. What is the best fiscal system which includes human production value? There are excellent arguments for and against gold/metals as the standard. We know that a fiat currency cannot be born out of nothing, it must have a parent.
However, if we return the balance of power to proven and honest officials guaranteed by verifiable checks and balances, this would not be as difficult.
+BN would still be one of the very best even if he didn’t understand the problem and the significance of our destructive monetary system, i.e., private central banks creating nearly all of the nation’s currency as loans PLUS INTEREST!
But the fact that he DOES UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM, AS WELL AS WHO HAS BEEN AND CONTINUES TO BE BEHIND IT, is the game winner — vis-à-vis a sound of the buzzer game winning slam dunk!
Not only does +BN grasp the history and underlying evil, WHILE CONSISTENTLY NAMING NAMES (unlike most everyone else, who still refuse to call out live human beings), he goes further. That is, he puts it on the line by unselfishly assuming a role of lonely leader.
Of course there are others too who definitely “get it”, and some are trying to spur action; e.g., the honest money movement in England through Ben Dyson’s Positive Money organization. We need more Ben Dyson energy at the grassroots in America.
If I could name one issue for the American public to zero in like a laser beam it would be the debt money/debt slavery/moneychanger catastrophe. Fix this curse, and the world will substantially improve.
Most nations and their people are poisoned by Rothschild’s money scam, and this is the most pressing and destructive issue of our time. Referencing a prior +BN video, the monetary problem and the urgency in changing the paradigm is the Mother of all Reforms. BULLS-EYE!!!
Finally, Peter Schiff and his itsy-bitsy gold chips is laughable. I hope people don’t fall for this Schiff/Austrian School Gold Standard fraud.
+BN is correct: the banking cartel and international Jewry does not like sovereign governments creating their own paper script, interest-free, for the benefit of the people.
However, they do like the Gold Standard, which I believe will turn out to be a very cruel trap, if we are conned into adopting it!
Economists have usually taught that labor gives money its value. Economists have been working to confuse people about money since the days of Adam Smith, who hated American prosperity and its successful fiat money.
The amount of labor required to dig up gold has little relation to its value. Silver takes more labor. What determines its fluctuating value is its fluctuating demand and scarcity. If the price is dropping, people won’t pay the digging cost.
One day scientists will figure out how to create gold out of lead. Or they will get vast quantities from some meteorite. It will be worth little.
Governments don’t go away. They don’t just collapse. When one fails, it is replaced by another one, maybe worse. There is no “poofing” except in Poof the Magic Dragon.
Let’s plan for government and government money to be around permanently, even if not consistently.
There are a number of would-be monetary reformers among the commenters and elsewhere who’s “reform” consists of wishing the government would just go away. Governments don’t voluntarily go away.
David Corum is deeply confused when he thinks it doesn’t matter who creates our money. This is Frankfort multicultural thinking. Don’t let the Jews program your mind.
Please be careful about your conscience. Normally the consciences of people who live in a Jewish matrix comes from the Jewish education and Jewish media. Some of your conscience obviously comes from the Church too, but it is mixed.
The conscience that is telling you that money must have intrinsic value comes from hundreds of hours of programming, not from God.
Fiat lux means Let their be light. It comes from God. Fiat comes from God. God instituted government. Government has the inherent power to issue/coin government fiat money, no matter what anyone wishes.
The question is: Will government use government created fiat money for the people or delegate it to Jewish enemies of God?
This is the crux of the issue which Brother Nathanael has been emphasizing in his excellent (and many) Monetary Reform Videos.
Your expression of being pulled equally in two opposite directions and being paralyzed with uncertainty aptly expresses the situation of millions. I sympathize with you.
As influenced by multicultural programming, many people are comfortable with the Jewish falsehood that there are excellent arguments on both sides of questions. Jews just say there are excellent arguments. But they are not excellent at all. They are stupid.
You are being educated by +BN. And yet you identify with Maloney’s line about leaching away your time and stealing your purchasing power.
A person with such internal conflicts winds up nullified and trapped just as the Jewish dialectic intends.
Look at this objectively.
Just because Mike Maloney / Peter Schiff (both assets of the Jewish dialectic) claim that fiat money is stealing your purchasing power and you don’t like that, it does not mean that gold will save your purchasing power.
Gold has always been the enemy of the common people, who have NO gold. The average person is a debtor. How is gold going to help? We were on the gold standard in the roaring 20’s. The gold standard doesn’t stop the inflation you dread at all.
Now look at +BN’s side. If we didn’t have Jew money siphoning off most of our productivity and purchasing power from money creation to money spending, we would be wealthy beyond imagination.
We live in a fabulously productive society, more than enough capacity for everyone.
It’s ridiculous to worry about inflation if wages and revenue are increasing faster than inflation. Inflation is nothing in itself. A little inflation stimulates commerce and recession caused by tight money destroying jobs.
The cause of your loss is not inflation. Its low wages and no jobs. The Jews have arranged this. Jabbering about gold is not going to fix it. Switching money creation from the Jewish bankers to us will fix it.
If you let Peter Schiff and the gold salesmen play on your fears, you could never positively and actively contribute to the winning team.
That’s why +BN apparently ended his video with Positive Money. Join Positive Money and help fix things. Their site has good videos and articles that will help you understand the details. +BN posted the links above.
I’m trying to get ready for my NYC Street Evangelism trip December 3-11 and some people have been contacting me regarding this Video and this Comments Section.
Let me chime in briefly and then go back to packing, errands, and last minute necessities.
Regarding the “gold/fiat” debate, the most famous Monetary speech in the history of America is William Jennings Bryan’s “The Cross Of Gold.”
“You shall not crucify mankind on a cross of gold,” warned Bryan with regard to the gold standard that the Jews wanted to use at that time to tighten credit and foreclose on debtor’s property.
MOST people are net debtors and easy prey for the Jews whose ultimate aim is to enslave the goyim.
PLEASE understand this. Gold salesmen shysters like Peter Schiff and Mike Maloney are distracting you from THIS issue and the REAL solution.
How is it that poor, indebted, jobless students and people struggling to pay their bills are so easily bamboozled by a BUNCH of Lew Rockwell CON ARTISTS into supporting the very “gold system” that has always been used to suppress them?
How is it that jobless students and struggling workers who have NO gold actually SUPPORT the Lew Rockwell CON ARTISTS pushing gold?
Please people, use your brains. Use your common sense. THE ISSUE is Jew control of fiat money. The solution is government control of fiat money. Their is NO in between.
This gold thing is JUST A DISTRACTION…it’s NOT going to happen. DON’T let the Lew Rockwell Jew-enabled con artists get you off track. +Brother Nathanael Kapner
Excellent BN! … precise, and right on point! Please, keep the focus going on this one dear Brother Nathanael.
It is also interesting that Adam Smith had several editions for his 1776 work “[How to Steal] The Wealth of Nations.”
The later ones were altered for the American market. As I remember it (from a few decades ago), the difference was in his renderings of the causes of the then upcoming American Revolution.
Although he used the word “capital” frequently in his text, he never defined it, except perhaps as something that “dogs fawn after” (not kidding there folks!). In his dialectic on “free trade” Smith had not yet discovered the words “Capitalist” or “Capitalism.”
Those two key words would first be discovered and defined by Smith’s successor, the “learned professor” — Karl Marx.
It may help Americans to know that “Capitalism” IS EXACTLY equal to Marxism. His three volume textbook, on capitalism as a political system, and on how to be a capitalist as an individual, remains to this day, the definitive textbook.
It is merely the extension of the fraud of Adam Smith (where “free trade” really means total lack of national sovereignty, especially as regards medium of exchange).
Marx provided the pathway for the upcoming age of perpetual war and for perpetual corporations which we are then taught to believe are the true sovereigns.
I believe that the national governments are the only ones who should issue any form of money.
History shows that many empires lasted for centuries in good economic fortunes, because they alone coined money through their respective national governments. An example of this is the Byzantine Roman Empire, in which the national government controlled many sectors of the economy.
The Republican conservative would scream bloody murder over this, but doesn’t realize that this control is not the same as classical socialist or Marxist thought.
The government of the empire kept prices down and required no bank to do so, again it sounds socialist, but one cannot pin socialism or Marxism to an empire where neither theory existed in its present form.
Also the the national government of the empire set interest rates and forbade usury. This makes both the Zionist controlled parties squirm, as neither of their handlers like the Byzantine Roman Empire, or its sound Christian money practices.
They scoff at the Byzantine Roman Empire, the continuation of Rome at Constantinople-New Rome that lasted another 1100 years, while a republic like Amerika is going to crumble, due to Zionist Jew finance capital.
And the Jews were expelled - once it were from England about 1200 AD.
They came in with William the Bastard, who brought them from their large colony in Rouen. They became expelled because they clipped the edges of the King’s silver coins.
So if they ever feel the people’s revolution coming - so fast that they have to empty their coffers and issue gold money again (Desperate Easing- DE1) , I shall be ready with scissors and polishing equipment and I hope you join the movement.
This whole debate is very confusing, with both sides of the fiat money system argument claing history on their side. I’m just curious to know why the Founding Fathers required the issuance of money be in gold and silver coinage?
Why did John Law’s experiment with fiat currency fail so miserably in France? Why is hyperinflation the norm in Zimbabwe née Rhodesia with the Mugabe government fully in charge of the fiat (non-fractional?) currency system?
Why are China and Russia hoarding gold bullion at break neck pace as the West dis hoards it’s gold reserves? Is Putin stupid?
Assuming degrees of validity to both sides of the debate I personally hold both precious metals and US and Canadian currency, just in case.
Obviously you are a person of common sense and agree with BN+ that it is OK to earn fiat money and get some bullion if you want a hedge.
The fact that people claim history is the right start, but worthless unless that history is factual and relevant.
The logic and details matter. Avoid reducing both sides to a standoff based on mere sound bytes.
The constitution limits the states to gold. The only limit for the sovereign government is to coin money and regulate the value thereof. The 1787 verb coin was a synonym for issue (like printing electronic dollars is a synonym for issuing).
Please concentrate more carefully on the verification of facts about the Founding Fathers and don’t believe false claims. Be more suspicious.
Nowhere does the Constitution require the US government to only issue money in gold and silver. When you collect your “facts” from internet jabber without double checking them, you will be building your conclusions on sand.
+BN has already explained why John Law’s fiat experiment failed. It was issued by a private bank, not the government.
Hyperinflation is not the norm in Zimbabwe. It is exceptional.
Hyperinflation is rare in the world. Eating too much salt can kill you but that does not make eating salt bad.
Inflation is normal because it is just a form of tax, which governments have the sovereign power to collect. The average worker would prefer to have income exceed inflation than to have both stagnant.
Tax is not theft, even if you hate it. Jesus was born in Bethlehem because of tax and paid the temple tax and told the Pharisees to pay tax to Caesar.
It is smart for banks and treasuries to keep some bullion. We should do it too. International trade balances can be cleared in gold. All countries have some gold and so all fiat currencies are backed by gold and other assets.
In that vague sense, all fiat currencies can be said to be gold-backed.
The Swiss have a larger proportion of gold backing than some other countries, but the Swiss just voted down a referendum to increase in the Russian direction because they understood the danger of recession caused by tying the currency to a fixed amount of gold.
But you would be quite wrong to conclude from that that governments should have a gold standard money where a preset amount of gold is payable to the bearer on demand. The Russians and Chinese are not going to fall for the stupid Austrian gold standard trap.
Putin is not so stupid that he will issue gold-standard rubles. He will just issue the ordinary gold-backed rubles, whatever that means.
Do you see the difference between gold standard (good for Jews but suicidal for governments) and gold backed (vague talk)?
All of you folks on this site and any other site just argue how you will get money to work, which type of money to use, who will control it, who will print it, etc. etc. etc.
The fact is, money is going down.
A person’s labor is what is important. Whether it be mental labor or physical labor. This labor is then traded with the rest of the laborers of the world to trade goods and services.
The problem today is you have a third party getting between the laborers, and the goods and services that they have labored to produce and distribute. They are the money-changers of the temple. The ones Jesus whipped out of the temple and told them that they had made His Father’s house a den of thieves. He was calling them thieves. Enough said about that.
In the new world that is coming, every head of a household who is physically and mentally able will have to do some sort of work to be able to take advantage of the goods and services that the other members of society have labored at. What they will be doing is trading labor.
What Brother explains, if some can get it, is the LEFT/RIGHT System is a fraud. The Jews created this matrix. It corrals, and limits. How many on this very site still are into attacking “Liberals,” or vice versa?
So should we back Jewish owned “Conservatives?”
Some will not even wake up,when Democrats/Republicans seemingly more ‘divided’ than ever unite when Israel/Jews make demands. One side competing to be more supportive than the other.
Only by thinking beyond LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE in the Jewish Prison with two opposite gates can we find liberation.
Nationalist Japan and National Socialist Germany ran amazing self financing economies, along with their minor Axis Partners, until smashed in 1945.
That was the real reason for that horrible conflict. As Ambassador Joseph P .Kennedy said: “We (Gentiles) lost WW2, and the Jews won it”.
SEE:THE JEWS KILLED JFK — YouTube.
Contemplate Brother deeply, and break the Jew thought process — Its Gentile v Jew, not LEFT/RIGHT.
Thank you Brother for all that you do. Please all, remember to keep Brother funded. The Jews rule us because they know the power of money and unity.
Gentiles, brain washed by them, into ’self-interest’, do not, and atomize themselves into greed and slavery .
The Jew created the LEFT/RIGHT system as a Left Hook, and a Right Upper cut to smash us — or in military terms — ‘A pincer movement’. This is the ‘Dialectic’ that Marx expounded upon — the Talmudic/Kabbala system pattern of GOD/SATAN as one.
Unless we break this pattern we will be running in a Jewish maze forever.
This presentation by Brother is one of his most important. Study it, and pass it please.
It works brilliantly with his: THE NATIONALIST SOLUTION TO MONEY, THE END OF SOVEREIGN AMERICA, and SATAN AT THE WAILING WALL!
Thank you for mentioning Peter Schiff. There are a lot of [”Christian”] “libertarians” that seem to be led by Jewish “libertarians” into slavery of non-nationalized monetary systems.
Some Jewish “libertarian” thinkers should be brought to light like Rothbard and Mises so that “libertarians” can pursue the truer freedom they are looking for in those instances, rather than the confusion of Jewish Austrian economics.
Thanks for pointing out that Christian libertarians often fall for the Jewish trap set by Rothbard and Mises in support of private (Jewish) banks against government issued money.
We probably agree that private banks are OK if they don’t cheat and don’t issue government money. And I hope you agree that they can’t replace government issued money.
When you say that “libertarians” can pursue the truer freedom, you seem to imply that there is a good kind of libertarian that doesn’t benefit the Jews. I seriously doubt this.
The usual definition of libertarians are those who want to reduce the power of the government. If you mean something else, you should be using a different word.
Freedom in Christ is freedom from sin, bondage to Christ. This is not libertarian. Giving money creation to national government increases its power. This is not libertarian as understood by most either.
What libertarians want is freedom from government oppression.
But what if their methods all serve the Jews and increase international government power? Jews love libertarians of all kinds because of their opposition to legitimate government regulation.
Three decades of Jewish deregulation have resulted in more regulation of all kinds except regulation of financial sector crimes. That is what deregulation means to the Jews.
And it is only national government that is weakened, not international.
The mistake of libertarians of all kinds is to underestimate the power of the international organized Jewish racket and overestimate the relative power of national government in the abstract.
They fail to see that government is oppressive primarily because it is in the hands of the Jews.
And most of all, they fail to see that national government is the only power strong enough on earth to stand up against international Jewish world government and that they should be strengthening it, not weakening it.
Libertarians help the Jews in their naivete, believing vainly that they can opt for neither of the above (national nor international power). That is why the Jews love libertarians of all kinds, because of their gullibility.
No libertarian on earth is a threat to the Jews. Libertarians are self-nullified in their wishful thinking. They have all gone right where the dialectic has herded them, thinking all the while that they are fighting for freedom.
Is libertarian even a good word? It is next to libertine, one who wishes to sin with impunity. Libertarians frequently oppose government regulation of morals. But all law is based on some religion, either God’s or one of Satan’s.
Libertarians cheer when adultery is decriminalized. More libertarians cheer when abortion is legalized and sodomy is protected.
This is the inherent direction of libertarianism. If your friends are grossly wrong, you need to change friends.
If people don’t believe this, consider what the Jews hate most.
“Nazis” are the number one villains of holocaustianity, which is Jewish erzatz Christianity. Hitler was apparently not a Christian so he is to be rejected.
But “Nazi” is just the simplified German word for “nationalist.” What Jews hate most is Christian national government.
That is why they love libertarians of all kinds, because libertarians are their allies in weakening national government.
The irony that libertarian sympathizers should try to grasp as they work free from the libertarian cocoon is that working for liberty from the front power, national government, actually works against the very liberty they seek by helping the hidden power, international Jewry.
Let’s forget libertarians and Jewish multiculturalism and instead be just old fashioned Christian nationalists.
National government needs to be restrained, but since it now lies under control of internationalists, the direct route is to deliver a lethal blow to international Jewish government by first taking back the money creation.
Maybe you agree with this line of thinking. If so great. Then just try to avoid implying that “libertarian” might be an acceptable word for those who pursue the truer freedom. Some words are so tainted they can’t be redeemed.
That’s a good post and in general I agree with it. Libertarianism poses no measurable threat to the Synagogue; and if it ever does they’ll just move in, infiltrate and corrupt it. They’ve already set it down a dead end road.
It’s the same as it ever was.
Clearly, we’re dealing with an aggressive force of astronomical cunning. I don’t mean Jews, I mean Satan - although he certainly gets a lot of mileage out of them.
Mileage that should have been God’s.
Depending on how you look at these things it’s our fortune or misfortune to live in a time when Satan is on his great march.
So, what political solution can stop him? Libertarianism? Pfffttt…. Christian Socialism? Pfffttt…. Overthrow the Jews? Pfffttt…. He’ll just switch flags.
You’re right when you say that nationalism presents a problem for the Jews… but not to Satan.
What DOES present a problem to Satan is Jesus.
And here’s where I diverge somewhat from your thesis. You speak of a “Christian National Government.” OK, but *which* brand of Christianity? There are more flavors of Christianity than there are ice creams at Baskin-Robbins. This too is a measure of Satan’s cunning.
We can be certain that any Christian nationalism under John Hagee would be a lot different than what you have in mind.
So, we find ourselves wandering around like lost sheep, in the land of wolves - with wolves for shepherds.
Nationalism is no panacea, just a counterbalance to a Zionist internationalism.
I sense a kindred soul. Hello brother.
I enjoyed your link on Google and your challenge on Christian nationalism.
It does not matter much what kind of Christian Nationalism I wish for because I am probably not going to get that particular flavor anyway.
I want to work it out in ecumenical councils as the early Church Fathers did. Personally I find the disunity in the Church to be heartbreaking. As for Zionist Christians, they will have to answer before the Lord for promoting baby murder, even if the oppose abortion. May the Lord wake them up.
The goal of Christian culture is not a prerequisite to a broader unity on monetary policy, since such right monetary policy would benefit Christians and non-Christians alike.
What matters most is what we work for. I would like to level the playing field so we have a fighting chance.
The number one best way to do that is deny the money franchise to the cheaters (see the very valuable link provided by George above).
Defeating Jews does not win the personal battle against sin for the love of Christ and our neighbors, our first goal.
But still as stewards of the Lord’s creation we want to prepare a habitation where our children can grow in the fear and admonition of the Lord.
To do that we must take dominion over government, which the Lord instituted. If we don’t protect our children and families and but send them to the wolves, we are worse than heathens.
Money is needed for commerce as air and sea are needed for transportation. If it were harnessed for us, we could put poverty behind us and work for the glory of the Lord.
There are foolish people on this site like Chestergimli who have had a vision from Satan that money is going to disappear.
Such wishful thinking people are useless for bearing fruit for the Lord in this short stay on earth. May the Lord have mercy on him and bring him to his senses. We plan for what we see, not what we wish for or imagine.
Since the time of Aristotle, thinking people have known that creation of government money belongs to society for society, not private mafias. Let’s join and organize and act on our knowledge.
I admit candidly that I have not answered your question, but that is only because I am not going to get distracted by abstracts out of my control away from the concrete step before me. I trust you will be kind and understand.
Famous Patent Lawyer, Supreme Court Lawyer, Prepared Briefs For Scopes Trial
Of the “two stage secret rapture” theory:
“It is mortifying to remember that I not only held and taught these novelties myself, but that I even enjoyed a complacent sense of superiority because thereof, and regarded with feelings of pity and contempt those who had not received the ‘new light’ and were unacquainted with this up-to-date method of ‘rightly dividing the word of truth’…
The time came… when the inconsistencies and self-contradictions of the system itself, and above all, the impossibility of reconciling its main positions with the plain statement of the Word of God, became so glaringly evident that I could not do otherwise than to renounce it” (Kingdom, pp.177,178).
Jewish fables (literally, myths) are no new thing.
Paul has plainly warned the household of faith not to give heed thereto.
He has not given us a list of those grievous heresies; but it is well known that the one that was most fondly cherished, and that constituted the gravest menace to the truth of the gospel, was the notion that the leading purpose of the mission of the coming Messiah would be the reconstitution of the Jewish nation and its elevation to the highest pinnacle of earthly dominion and glory.
For that fatuous doctrine was the cornerstone of orthodox Judaism in Paul’s day; and because of his sturdy opposition to it he was persecuted, his enemies plotted to take his life, and he was sent a prisoner to Rome. No wonder that, during the term of his imprisonment there, he wrote to Titus his plain-spoken warning against “Jewish fables.”
Such being the case, we question if there be anything in all the long history of Christianity that is more difficult to account for than the fact that that particular fable, concerning the purpose of Christ’s mission to the Jewish people, has become the central feature of a system of doctrine which, in this 20th century of our era, has found numerous and zealous advocates amongst orthodox Christians.
In view of this extraordinary phenomenon, it surely behooves those who take the Holy Scriptures for their guide and instructor in all matters of faith and doctrine, to search them with the utmost care “whether these things be so.” This present volume is the result of a painstaking investigation of that important question.
The investigation of that question leads inevitably to the subject of the Millennium; and it is believed the reader will find, in the last chapter of the present volume, something fresh upon that subject of perennial interest.
Enough at this point to say that, as the author now sees it, the great question concerning the Millennium is not When? but Where?
The Rothschild empire is estimated to be worth $500 trillion.
Considering the wars and other social turmoils they’ve created over the last 200 years, it seems about the right amount for the people of the world to rise up and seize, in exchange for their miserable skins.