If Putin’s A ‘Killer,’ America’s A Butcher
By Brother Nathanael Kapner
Here we go again.
Jewmerica needs a demon to hate a thousand miles away.
And Bill O’Reilly is simply a pawn in Jewry’s game.
[Clip: “Do you respect Putin?
“I do respect him.”
“Do you? Why?”
“I respect a lot of people, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to get along with him. He’s a leader of his country, I say it’s better to get along with Russia than not. Will I get along with him? I have no idea.”
“But he’s a killer though. Putin’s a killer.”
“There are a lot of killers. We got a lot of killers. What, do you think our country is so innocent? Do you think our country’s so innocent?”
“I don’t know of any government leaders that are killers.”]
I do. Start with Obama.
Taking orders from a host of neocon Jews, not only did Obama kill Libyans but killed a country with the highest standard of living in Africa.
Libyans who enjoyed subsidies for health, housing, and education from Gadhafi are now swimming in rafts to Italy.
What about Syria, where Christians, Muslims, and even Jews lived peaceably?
But with Kristol, Kagan, and Ross pushing regime change by enabling al-Nusra and Isis, a hundred thousand civilians died at their bloody armchair hands.
Obama and the entire neocon gang should be hanged by The Hague as callous butchers.
The proof is there. But Putin’s a ‘killer?’ Who did he kill?
Bought by Norman Braman’s Jewish bucks, pretty boy Rubio can’t find any proof in the pudding.
[Clip: “Is Vladimir Putin a war criminal?”
“I would not use that term.”
“Uh, Mr Tillerson, do you believe that, uhhm, Vladimir Putin and his cronies are responsible for ordering the murder of countless dissidents, journalists, and political opponents?”
“I do not have sufficient information to make that claim.”]
Neither does Rubio. But who needs proof when playing to the Jews?
Another shill, Mitch McConnell, to please his Jewish backers like Stephen Schwarzman, called Putin a thug.
[Clip: “Are you comfortable with the President of the United States seeming to equate US actions with those of Putin’s authoritarian regime?”
“Well look. Putin’s a former KGB, uh agent. He’s a thug.”]
If admired by his peers abroad and lauded at home, if Putin’s a thug then McConnell’s a chump.
What hack—whether Rubio or McConnell—has the guts to tell it like it is?
[Clip: “Just look at the situation in the Middle East and Northern Africa already mentioned by the previous speaker. Of course, political and social problems have been piling up for a long time in this region, and people there wanted change. But what was the actual outcome? Aggressive intervention instead of reforms rashly destroyed government institutions and the local way of life. Instead of democracy and progress, there is now violence, poverty, social disasters and total disregard for human rights, including even the right to life.
I’m urged to ask those who created this situation: do you at least realize now what you’ve done?
But I’m afraid that this question will remain unanswered, because they have never abandoned their policy, which is based on arrogance, exceptionalism, and impunity.”]
And “exceptionalism” keeps bombing away.
[Clip: “I’m trying to imagine your response if president Obama had defended the murderous reign of Putin by saying, ‘you think our country’s so innocent?’”
“Well look, I’m not going to critique the president’s every utterance but I do think America’s exceptional, America is different, aah, we don’t operate in any way the way the Russians do.”]
Right. Russia fights terrorists, America arms them.
And why does Tapper tout the Jewish lie that Putin’s reign is “murderous?”
Putin is hated by Jewry for reviving Symphony of Church and State in Russia where Jews have no power.
And for expanding Russia’s influence that reaches all the way to Israel with military bases up against their border.
Too close for comfort…especially with Putin demanding that international law be enforced against Israel’s theft of Palestinian property.
But that’s okay with the chumps who shill for Israel.
But Jewish bucks thrown to DC hacks covers a multitude of sins.
Right now there are only 2 real leaders who are protectors of Christians around the World. Putin and Trump.
You see what the Jews are doing to both of them with obstruction and sanctions…Most Jews because of their hatred of God are willing to support Muslims rather then Christians…There is no doubt, the Jews at the end will fail.
I am sorry to have to say this, but I look at the history of America and I see a war-mongering, killer nation from day one. She followed in the footsteps of her mother, that stately lady who ruled the seas - England, land of some of my forbears.
This had never been my opinion, until researching its past and present history.
The past few Presidents alone, basically have been killers. As for Trump, he is yet unproven.
One thinks of the massacres in for instance, the Philippines. Yes, I know we owe a debt to the U.S. for her great assistance in the war against Japan. We were thankful but our Aussie soldiers proved themselves as heroes and pulled their weight in gold.
The true stories of the wars in the Middle East of late years, against Iraq, Syria, Libya and to this day those continuing elsewhere show the killer instinct of the nation’s leaders at least. Are the ordinary people pacifists?
Look at the drones, being sent in to kill all and sundry, including innocent women and children. Has Putin ever done this?
Most decidedly not.
An honest appraisal of the news from CNN, Fox and including the BBC, shows rank dishonesty. It has been obvious for at least four years that there was a continuous tirade of lies against Putin and Russia.
Even Australia was caught up in the dishonesty of its journalists who either were what one would call ignorant or unethical.
The great plan to run the world by certain Jews, and may I say obviously not all others are guilty, is devised to not only blacken the name of Russia and its President but to eliminate both.
The US is not only Butcher but Undertaker, Grave-Robber and Necrophiliac, preparing the death, taking the spoils, and continuing to f*** the countries it has destroyed for its ruler and king anti-Christian, satanic Zion!
If a president signs off on orders for drone strikes to kill a boogeyman and his kids in a sovereign country, that we are not at war with does that make him a murderer? His signature implies responsibility. The blood of the innocent people killed will be on his hands.
It is truly exceptional, I Agee, we are also exceptionally fat and stupid, but as a country we should not advertise this so blatantly.
“We have plenty of our own killers too”, “drain the swamp”, “crooked Hillary” “FAKE news” etc. These phrases are entering common parlance worldwide now that they are being uttered by a President.
It will take a massive effort to get us out of this Judaeo-Marxist slime which is now so entrenched in our nations–but it seems to be happening.
In Europe there is some sort of reaction building up against the current world order and the traitors who represent it.
And you would be surprised how many ordinary people understand the talking points of a website like this one.
President Assad himself is not critical of the US ban on Muslim countries saying it was an issue of state sovereignty and that these terrorists are now all over Europe because of its lack of restrictions. Unlikely to see this on CNN.
And the Iranian president himself has said that Trump gave a very honest description of US government presumably referring to the moment of reckoning speech that focused on the antics of the N.W.O./J.W.O.
I get angry every time I watch BN’s videos showing little “punks” like Rubio and “noodle-mouth” McConnell spewing their garbage.
How did these losers become our so-called “leaders” or “representatives”?
Who could look and watch these fools and then actually vote for them? Morons! That’s right! Only morons vote for these people and parade them around like they are somebodies. They are nobodies.
The United States hasn’t won a war since WW2. And how much did they win when 80% of the war was fought on the Eastern front (Russia)?
Continuous wars. Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya (funded), Syria (funded), and Iran (funded Iraq). Let’s not forget funding Iraq against Iran and then eventually attacking Iraq who they funded.
The troops have always died in vain because every war was for Ashkenazi Jew power and control.
They’ve been killing off the whites in all their wars for decades and even centuries. Even after all your dying in vain for them, they still spit in your face telling you working-class whites should be replaced (little Jew-boy nothing Billy Kristol).
We should learn from the past wars where we had no idea at that time who was really behind it. Now we know, so we are stupid to keep fighting for them. We are stupid to continually die in vain for the Jew elite and their wars.
Swamp Politics: Out With the Old Alligators, in With the New Crocodiles.
Crocodiles are generally considered to be much more aggressive and dangerous than alligators.
The largest species are responsible for many human fatalities.
Iran Hawks Take the White House
Inspired by fringe theories about Islamic civilization, Michael Flynn is leading Trump down a dangerous path.
By PHILIP GIRALDI • February 9, 2017
The United States is adding new sanctions on Iran over that country’s alleged misdeeds, and nearly all of those allegations are either out-and-out lies or half-truths.
It has a familiar ring to it, as demonizing Tehran has been rather more the norm than not since 1979, a phenomenon that has included fabricated claims that the Iranians killed American soldiers after the U.S.’s armed interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This time around, the administration focused on the perfectly legal Iranian test of a non-nuclear-capable, medium-range ballistic missile and the reported attack on what was initially claimed to be a U.S. warship by allegedly Iranian-backed Yemeni Houthi fighters. The ship was later revealed to be a Saudi frigate.
Donald Trump’s national-security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, “officially” put Iran “on notice” while declaring that “The Trump Administration will no longer tolerate Iran’s provocations that threaten our interests. The days of turning a blind eye to Iran’s hostile and belligerent actions toward the United States and the world community are over.”
Ignoring the fact that Iran cannot actually threaten the United States or any genuine vital national interests, the warning and follow-up action from the White House also contradict Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to avoid yet another war in the Middle East, which appears to have escaped Flynn’s notice.
The increase in tension and the lack of any diplomatic dialogue mean that an actual shooting war might now be a “false flag,” false intelligence report, or accidental naval encounter away.
If it all sounds like a reprise of the baseless allegations and intentionally unproductive negotiations that led to the catastrophic Iraq War, it should.
What “belligerent actions against the United States” Flynn was referring to, generally speaking, were not completely clear, but that lack of precision may have been intentional, to permit instant vilification of anything Tehran attempts to do to counter the hostility coming out of Washington.
Hating Iran has a considerable pedigree. I must confess to being of a generation in the federal government, like Flynn and others, where saying something derogatory about Iran was in the DNA, welcomed by all and sundry.
I nursed a personal and specific grudge relating to the mullahs, as an Iranian government agent tried to kill me in Turkey in the 1980s.
But more often the animosity was generic, sometimes expressed humorously at CIA Station staff meetings.
I recall how one fellow officer who was undercover at a consular office would positively gloat as he described how many Iranian visa applicants he had turned down in the past week and everyone would bang their fists on the conference table, signifying their approval.
Of course, we all felt fully justified in our Iranophobia due to the 1979-80 embassy hostage crisis, which was still very fresh in our minds.
But my rancor toward Iran has long since faded. I have Iranian friends and have come around to the view that Iran has much more been sinned against than sinned in its relationship with the United States.
With the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in July 2015, I even began to believe that the two nations might well be able to resume something like normal diplomatic relations, which would benefit everyone involved.
Alas, such hopes appear to be scuppered by a recent wave of Iran hysteria that bids fair to eclipse the Russian panic that has consumed the media and chattering class during the past six months.
I should have seen it coming. In December 2015, I was present at a conference in Moscow where General Flynn explained his concept of 21st-century geo-economic-political strategy.
At least I think that was what he was talking about, though one can understand the frustration of the interviewer, Sophie Shevdernadze, as she tried to get him to explain what he meant during a largely incoherent presentation.
At the time I knew little about Flynn and his views, but I was particularly taken aback by a random shot he took at the Iranians, stating very clearly that they were responsible for “fueling four proxy wars in the Middle East.” He was presumably referring to Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Yemen.
The audience, which included a number of international journalists and genuine foreign-policy experts, became somewhat restless and began to mutter.
I was standing in the back of the room and witnessed Flynn’s son, Michael G. Flynn, responding to the expressions of disbelief, waving his arms around and shouting “Right! Right! Check the intel!”
Two minutes later, the elder Flynn returned to the theme, mentioning the “terrible nuclear deal with Iran.”
Now, I am accustomed to hearing nasty things about Iran, but they usually come from Israeli partisans who persist in falsely describing the Iranians as a global threat.
It is in their interest to do so, and many pliable American politicians and media talking heads have picked up the refrain, so much so that a U.S. attack on Iran would likely be endorsed overwhelmingly by Congress and applauded in the media.
But I believed that Flynn was not particularly in with that group, consisting largely of neoconservatives, and his disdain for Iran seemed to be at least somewhat sincere in that it appeared to be rooted in his own experience as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
But I was wrong and should have paid more attention to the people Flynn was talking to.
Sources of Flynn’s Worldview
A long-time foe of Iran, Michael Ledeen believed that invading the country should have been the first priority in 2003 rather than Iraq.
He believes that “everything traces back to Tehran” and that Iran manipulates both sides of the Shi’ite-Sunni conflict, leading reviewer Peter Beinart to note that his “effort to lay virtually every attack by Muslims against Americans at Tehran’s feet takes him into rather bizarre territory.”
Even as Flynn was speaking in Moscow he was collaborating with Ledeen [neocon Jew & Zionist-Kj] on a book called The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies, which appeared in July 2016.
The book has two basic premises. First, the entire “civilized world” is engaged in a life-and-death struggle with a perverted form of Islam that has produced the phenomenon referred to as “radical Islamic terrorism,” a phrase that may have been embraced by the Trump administration largely thanks to Flynn.
Flynn insists on the tag including the Islamic part because of his belief that the Muslim religion is itself intrinsic to the very nature of the conflict.
In fact, he prefers to call Islam a political ideology rather than a religion and even describes it as a political ideology that has “metastasized” into “malignant cancer.” He once tweeted that “Fear of Muslims is RATIONAL,” linking to a false claim that Islam wants 80 percent of humanity enslaved or exterminated.
Second, Ledeen’s book views Iran as both the source and lynchpin of the massive disorder prevailing in the Middle East, with tentacles reaching throughout the region and beyond.
It is itself a radical Islamic regime that uses terror as a weapon, a state sponsor of terrorism according to the State Department, and it also is an ally of movements like ISIS and the various al-Qaeda affiliates that it only pretends to be fighting.
Flynn and Ledeen also assert that Iran is intent on developing a nuclear weapon and has a secret program to do so in spite of the 2015 agreement.
It would use such a weapon to threaten Israel and other U.S. interests in the Middle East and beyond, and is simultaneously developing ballistic missiles that could be used to deliver the weapons on target.
In addition to Ledeen, Flynn’s conspiratorial mindset goes back further, to his days with DIA, where he was well known for what his staff referred to as “Flynn facts,” things he would say that were demonstrably untrue.
He once insisted that three-quarters of all new cell phones were bought by Africans and maintained that Iran has killed more Americans than al-Qaeda.
Few dared to disagree. When he took over DIA, Flynn said to his senior staff that everyone needed to know was that he was always right. His subordinates would only be right when their views became the same as his.
DIA Director Flynn considered the Benghazi attack in September 2012 to be an incident in the global war against Islam.
His initial reaction was to “prove” Iranian involvement, and he pressured his analysts to come up with the evidence, including shouting at them when they couldn’t support his conclusions. He told the analysts that Benghazi was a “black swan” event that needed more creative analysis to unravel.
Later, in testimony before the House of Representatives in June 2015, Flynn stated that Iran represents a clear and present danger to the region, and eventually to the world.
Iran’s stated desire to destroy Israel is very real. Iran has not once contributed to the greater good of the security of the region. Nor has Iran contributed to the protection of security for the people of the region.
Instead, and for decades, they have contributed to the severe insecurity and instability of the region, especially the sub-region of the Levant surrounding Israel. … It is clear that the nuclear deal is not a permanent fix but merely a placeholder.
Flynn was eventually fired from DIA over his hardline views, in part because of his demonization of Iran and Islam. It would be easy to suggest that Flynn has only a tenuous grasp on what is really going on in the Middle East.
Consider his assertion that Shi’ite Iran is in league with groups like al-Qaeda—which consider Shi’a to be a heresy and are willing to kill its followers on that basis alone.
But the situation is actually much more dangerous than the usual Washington groupthink: Flynn and Ledeen have constructed a narrative in which the world is at war with a great evil and Iran is the central player on the enemy side.
It is a viewpoint that is, unfortunately, shared at least in part by the new secretaries of defense and state and endorsed by many in Congress.
This has consequently developed into a new sensibility about U.S. national security that is apparently driving the Trump administration’s responses to Iranian behavior.
The Danger of Escalation
Iran certainly exhibits assertive behavior regionally. But much of its maneuvering is defensive in nature; it is surrounded by a sea of enemies, most of whom are better armed and funded than it is.
The nuclear agreement with Iran has considerably delayed any possible development of a nuclear weapon and is in everyone’s interest. It is not plausibly a delaying tactic to acquire a weapon somewhere down the road, as Flynn and Ledeen would have us believe.
Iran will be a very tough nut to crack if Flynn has his way and the Trump White House employs military force. Iran is roughly the same size as Alaska and has three times the population of Iraq, and the Iranian people have a strong national identity.
They would fight hard, and using their sophisticated Russian-provided air defenses and Chinese missiles they could inflict major damage on U.S. air and naval units in the Persian Gulf region. They would also be able to unleash limited but nevertheless lethal terrorist resources.
It would not be a “cakewalk,” and even if there were a military victory of some sorts, the world would be left with yet another power vacuum in the heart of Asia.
I believe that Flynn is a dangerous man, possibly even mentally unhinged on some issues.
He thinks that the United States has the preemptive right to tell countries in the Middle East what is acceptable and what is not and is willing to exercise various repressive measures to compel good behavior. Iran, as a designated “problem state,” is consequently not allowed to act in support of its own national-security interests.
Flynn justifies his hostility by claiming that Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and instability, which is a self-serving lie.
Absent diplomacy to resolve differences, the only interaction with Tehran from Washington has become the threat of economic sanctions backed up by military force. As Iran responds in kind this will become an escalatory cycle with no easy way out.
A better policy would allow Iran to diversify naturally without a constant stream of provocations that only serve to embolden hardliners. Iran’s young people, the majority of the population, are very pro-Western and even pro-American in their cultural affinities and sentiments.
The Iranian population is closely tied to a large Iranian diaspora, with an estimated 1.5 million Iranians living in the U.S. alone.
Threats of military action will strengthen the grip of the government in Tehran, producing hard responses and piling threat upon threat that will ultimately lead nowhere.
Hopefully some adults in the White House cabinet room will at some to point tell Michael Flynn that it is time to sit down and listen to the facts.
Second, remove the worst of the Jews from civil society and place them in Christian re-education interment centers.
This need not mean removing civil liberties from all Jews, a la National Socialist Germany. But all Jews who have violated domestic and international laws would be forced into internment centers or prisons and undergo harsh Christian re-education.
The general Jewish population would be able to live freely within society (provided they have not broken any laws) though would have to bear the burden of having the Jewish stigma. They would also generally be forbidden from holding positions of prominence in the media, finance, politics, education or anywhere they would stir up trouble.
Also, to hell with the “separation of Church and state”. We should Christianize all American laws so that Christian morals and ethics are explicitly written into a new and updated Constitution. Talmudic Judaism would be outlawed entirely for it is not even a real religion in any sense to begin with.
If Jews are following Jewish law, what’s the problem?
It’s within Jewish law to torture whole families. It’s within Jewish law to start wars. It’s within Jewish law to deceive the public. And if you’re an anti-Semite you’re not even a goyim any more you are a criminal in Jewish law.
The thing is, why would anyone believe God could support something so evil as Jewish law?
Jews even torture young children. God supports the Jews?
Here is another example of the Judaeo-Marxist divide and rule strategy– White v Black (called “racism”), Christian v Muslim (called “war on terror” or “clash of civilizations”), man v woman (called “feminism”), rich v poor (called “Bolshevism/socialism/liberalism”) etc.
If the information on the above named Neocon is accurate & truthful I can just imagine how the Founding Fathers would have dealt with him.
“Ledeen was a founding member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and he served on the JINSA Board of Advisors. In 2003, the Washington Post alleged that he was consulted by Karl Rove, George W. Bush’s closest advisor, as his main international affairs adviser.”
“Michael Ledeen had been accused of being involved in the forgery which claimed that Saddam Hussein had bought yellowcake in Niger.”
“Writing in The Nation, a left-wing magazine, Jack Huberman, who describes Ledeen as “the most influential and unabashed warmonger of our time,” attributes these quotes to Ledeen:
* “the level of casualties (in Iraq) is secondary”
* “we are a warlike people (Americans)…we love war”
* “Change - above all violent change - is the essence of human history”
* “the only way to achieve peace is through total war”
* “The purpose of total war is to permanently force your will onto another people”
* “Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business”
Michael Ledeen is a very nasty piece of work in Jewish neocon circles.
He is nucking futz like many Jewish neocons. Please excuse my keyboard’s dyslexia.
Ledeen always preferred to move in the shadows avoiding much publicity. He’s a major backer and signer of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) which became official WH neocon foreign policy under Gw Bush, kicking off with the US-Coalition of the Willing Patsies.
“American Century” was neo-con publishing magnate Henry Luce’s euphemism for pursuing the American Empire, US global hegemony, back in 1941.
Luce, whose parents were evangelical missionaries in China, is certainly the grandfather of the neocon “American Exceptionalism” messianic political philosophy which is parroted endlessly by neocon Republicans, and constantly fed by the evangelical Judeo-Christian right and their hybrid Calvinistic Prosperity Gospel ad nauseum.
He was reluctant to use the word “empire”, however, for US global hegemony, which George HW Busch called the New World Order, and which John McCain let slip which +BN caught in a clip of a Senate hearing.
The site, Old American Century, a PNAC watchdog during the G W Bush era, is something of an archive now but well worth going through for its research and solid documentation, does confirm as plausible hearsay Ledeen’s “crappy nation” quote:
Jonah Jacob Goldberg [Another nasty Israel loyalist necon Jew and propagandist now Senior Editor at the National Review], Ledeen’s colleague at National Review magazine, coined the term “Ledeen Doctrine” in a 2002 column.
“This tongue-in-cheek “doctrine” is usually summarized as “Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business,” which Goldberg remembered Ledeen saying in an early 1990s speech.”
In his own words for National Review, Jonah Goldberg: Baghdad Delenda Est, Part Two (excerpt)
So how does all this, or the humble attempt at a history lesson of my last column, justify tearing down the Baghdad regime? Well, I’ve long been an admirer of, if not a full-fledged subscriber to, what I call the “Ledeen Doctrine.”
I’m not sure my friend Michael Ledeen will thank me for ascribing authorship to him and he may have only been semi-serious when he crafted it, but here is the bedrock tenet of the Ledeen Doctrine in more or less his own words:
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.”
That’s at least how I remember Michael phrasing it at a speech at the American Enterprise Institute about a decade ago (Ledeen is one of the most entertaining public speakers I’ve ever heard, by the way).
Saddam Hussein deserved to be overthrown by the United States at the end of the Gulf War, and it does not seem to me that a statute of limitations has expired on that verdict.
Jude Wanniski’s protestations notwithstanding, the near-universal consensus among experts is that Saddam Hussein gassed the Kurds.
Ledeen: “If we just let our own vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to be clever and piece together clever diplomatic solutions to this thing, but just wage a total war against these tyrants, I think we will do very well and our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”
– Michael Ledeen October 29, 2001, (speaking on a panel discussion at the American Enterprise Institute)
Transcript (interestingly, the Archive.com bots stopped tracking this page from AEI in December of 2016. AEI is a major mostly Jewish think-tank in the interlocking machinery of neocon think-tanks and various Jewish civil society organizations ):
I forgot to mention that Ledeen co-wrote with Michael Flynn, both Israel-firsters and arch Iran haters and Muslim baiters, big in neocon fear-mongering: The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies.
We can win the “global war against “radical Islam” in large part by stopping attacking Arab and Muslim nations directly or through proxy wars, and stopping selling weapons to to Israel and Saudi Arabia to name two.
Clearly, there’s a great disconnect in Flynn and Ledeen’s minds and the rest of the neocon ilk, that in terms of cause and effect.
If the American Century Empire of the 20th century, and its successor New Jewmerican Century Empire of the 21st century continually wage perpetual warfare on peoples, currently the Arab and Muslim countries since 1953, then understandably people become resentful at having their countries smashed up, and just may be a little “ungrateful” (new neocon buzzword) and hold a grudge as a consequence.
The US is the bully that stands painfully grinding onto the smaller guy’s foot, and then gets offended because he gets rudely pushed off.
Here in America, we have 2-3 million Muslims, nominal and devout of different schools and Islamic denominations, most of them loyal American citizens, out of 324 million people.
Many of them are 2nd, 3rd, even 4th generation from different national origins, or else the homegrown black national separatists Nation of Islam, and a not insignificant number of converts.
American Arabs and Muslims do not have in American civil society the Israel-loyalist political machinery of a loosely centralized, interlocking directorate of the Israel lobby groups, synagogue communities, think tanks, Zionist, corporate, religious, and civil society organizations that the Jews do — in aggregate amounting to 100s in the US if not thousands, and spanning the globe as a a giant transnational nation within a nation.
It’s going to be a very, very long time before there are enough Muslims in the US who wish to overthrow the gubbermint and install “Sharia” in place of the Constitution.
In the meantime, Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative wrote: Flynn’s Warped Worldview and Trump’s Foreign Policy you and RJN family ought to read.
Larison is an Orthodox Christian, an anti-interventionist “paleoconservative” and foreign policy analyst (a polymath and an ordained Orthodox deacon). He has a PhD in Byzantine history which means he knows considerably more about the people of the Middle East and the ways of the world than Flynn does.
Excerpt from Flynn’s Warped Worldview (Dec 2016):
Flynn has been one of Trump’s top advisers throughout the campaign, so if he is selected this is probably the least surprising choice Trump will make.
There is no question in my mind that this is a bad choice. Having Flynn in this position means that Trump’s foreign policy is going to be shaped to a large extent by someone with very dangerous views.
I have talked a bit about Flynn’s disturbing worldview before, and I mentioned it again in my remarks on the relationship with Russia on Tuesday, but I think it merits reviewing again.
The biggest red flag is the book he co-authored with Michael Ledeen. The fact that he would work with Ledeen is damning enough by itself, and the content of the book shows just how delusional and hard-line Flynn is.
One reviewer summed up the book’s thesis this way:
Michael Flynn, who served as Obama’s second Defense Intelligence Agency director, takes the opposite view.
“Field of Fight,” a new book Flynn co-wrote with historian Michael Ledeen, argues that America is up against a global alliance between radical jihadis and anti-American nation states like Russia, Cuba and North Korea.
They say this war will last at least a generation. And they say it will require outside ground forces to go after al Qaeda and the Islamic State as well as a sustained information campaign to discredit the ideology of radical Islam.
It can’t be stressed enough that this is a deranged view of the threats to the U.S. Nothing could be more foolish or dangerous than believing in this non-existent “global alliance,” which lumps together disparate and competing states and groups and treats them all as part of the same threat.
This not only grossly exaggerates the threats to the U.S., but it also distorts our understanding of the threats that do exist by absurdly linking them to one another.
Needless to say, this view insists on endless U.S. entanglement in the affairs of predominantly Muslim countries for decades to come, and it requires increased hostility toward both Russia and Iran (among others).
Your in depth analysis does expose very sinister puppet masters.
The ideal way to deal with such wickedness would be a Executive Order from The Donald to round up such ultra demonic demons, Waffen-SS style with fixed bayonets.
Since for the time being it be Pie in the Sky, we can only watch & wait on Trumps navigation through the swamp (since he doesn’t appear to be draining it.)
So far Trump has displayed a combination of adroit deftness & dexterity.
For America to even have a chance to become “Great Again” left wing democrat sociopaths will require neutralizing, Trump does seem to recognise this.
When on the eve of the POTUS election I spoke of American Patriots’ duty to vote for Trump, believe me I was very mindful of Trump’s utterances on Iran and Israehell though this being secondary to keeping HeLLary out. (My attitude to a severe problem is We Jump That Hurdle When We Come To It.)
Well,thanks to Flynn & co. that “hurdle” is in sight.
With a promising start (to a National Patriot) I just can’t see The Donald doing a G.W.Bush & embroiling the US in another cataclysmic Middle East war.
I have no idea if Trump is the right guy for the job, but I was struck by the strange fact that Holywood’s best known actors jumped in to attack him with monosyllabic mud slinging.
Robert De Niro is the best example. I googled him and see he was jewed out of $82 million by a New York art dealer.
Then I googled “Robert De Niro French prostitution ring” and see he is involved with one.
According to internet gossip the ring involves underage girls and you have to wonder 1) If Diniro slipped into the role of a child molester in his movie “Taxicab” because the role came easily to him; and 2) having lost his shirt to an art dealer, if his Hollywood masters told him to cash in his chips by criticizing Trump, if he ever wanted to work in that town again?
Come to think of it Jesus threw the moeny changers out of the temple, the usurious banking system 2,000 years ago and today all Bro Nat is asking is to once again throw the jews, the Rotschilds and their Jewish allies, out of the userious banking system.
The Trump team is filled with intrigue and a unique dynamic of players.
I’ve never been more fascinated with an administration than now.
Keep your eye on “shining star” Stephen Miller (and pray that he and Kushner are not kindred spirits at the end of the day).
No doubt Brother Nathanael can elaborate. Meanwhile, I read that the first lady’s heritage may function as a bridge between the U.S. and Russia no? really? :-))
I’m sure the good “bad-Vlad” secretly can’t wait to meet them! RT reports that he was open to the idea of such a meeting occurring in the Slovenian capital of Ljubljana, Melania’s birthplace (to quote).
P.S. one thing for sure, breathing a huge sigh of relief that The Donald nixed warmongering neocon rat, Elliott Abrams a foothold into the State Dept. and for all the right reasons.
Thank you, Lord!!
p.s. humble donation soon next week I think, Dear Brother Nathanael. God Bless!
Haaretz: From Sleepovers to Speaking Fees: NYT Profile Reveals Netanyahu’s Close Ties to the Kushners
Netanyahu’s relationship with Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner goes way back.
His father featured alongside Adelson and Ron Lauder on a list of potential donors Netanyahu compiled in 2007.
As a member of a prominent American Jewish family, it is no surprise that U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner won’t be meeting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the first time when the Israeli leader arrives in Washington D.C. on Wednesday.
But an exhaustive profile of the Kushner-Netanyahu connection in Sunday’s New York Times reveals new details of the extent and depth of the acquaintance between the two men, who will sit in the Oval Office on February 15 to discuss peace in the Middle East.
It turns out that Netanyahu spent the night in Kushner’s bed when he was a guest in the Kushner home on a trip to the United States before becoming prime minister.
Jared, a teenager at the time, bunked in the basement for the night.
The profile also recalled how, later, at age 17, Kushner listened to Netanyahu’s address the “March of the Living” at the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematorium in 1998, during his first stint as prime minister.
The sleepover wasn’t the only time Netanyahu paid his respects to the Kushner clan.
The article detailed a visit in which he “shared a tabbouleh lunch,” visited Jared Kushner’s father Charles at his office and played soccer at one of the Jewish day schools bearing the Kushner family name with Joshua Kushner, Jared’s younger brother.
Over the course of the campaign and through the transition, the woes of Charles Kushner were extensively reported – the feud between Kushner and his extended family regarding misuse of family company funds that led him to commit tax fraud, illegal contributions and suborning a witness.
This landed him a two-year prison sentence, of which he served 14 months.
What was less widely known, the Times revealed, was that when Murray Kushner, Charles’ brother, filed a suit against him, part of the misuse of funds included paying hundreds of thousands of speaking fees to Netanyahu.
More evidence of a close Kushner-Netanyahu connection is the fact that Charles Kushner was placed highly on a leaked list of billionaires and millionaires – both Israelis and foreigners – Netanyahu compiled as potential donors in 2007.
The names were organized into four categories as to who was most likely to contribute. Kushner was high on the list alongside names like Sheldon Adelson and Ron Lauder.
Donald Trump also appeared on the list, but he, unlike Kushner, was ranked in the fourth category – the least likely to give.
The profile scrutinized Jared’s deep “personal and religious” ties with Israel, his education at day schools where “the West Bank was often referred to by its biblical names, Judea and Samaria, a practice that emphasizes Jewish claims to the land” and his family’s donations to West Bank settlements.
It contrasts his connection with Israel and Netanyahu with the fact that he has little familiarity with the wider Arab world and there is no evidence as to whether he has spent any time in Palestinian towns or cities.
This has led to skepticism over his knowledge and impartiality as he tries to “craft a strategy to recruit Sunni Muslim countries that oppose Iran to help foster an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement.”
For Kushner, Israel Policy May Be Shaped by the Personal
Though Mr. Kushner has visited Israel since childhood, and more recently to do business, he is little known there.
He holds strong views about the state of Israel, but he has not been outspoken about them, save for editorials in The New York Observer, the newspaper he owned. His thinking on matters like settlements is not well understood.
“Israel wasn’t a political discussion for him; it was his family, his life, his people,” said Hirschy Zarchi, rabbi at the Chabad House at Harvard, where Mr. Kushner was an undergraduate.
Rather than diplomatic experience, Mr. Kushner has ties to Israel that are personal and religious. His visit to Auschwitz was stark, but its themes were not new to him.
His grandmother survived the Holocaust by crawling through a homemade tunnel in Poland. His grandfather escaped the massacres by hiding in a hole for years.
An Orthodox Jew, Mr. Kushner was instructed to protect Israel, remember the genocide and assure the survival of the Jewish people, those close to him say.
He was educated at Jewish schools where second graders were expected to draw maps of Israel from memory and the West Bank was often referred to by its biblical names, Judea and Samaria, a practice that emphasizes Jewish claims to the land.
His family used its real estate fortune to donate millions of dollars to American Jewish and Israeli hospitals, schools and other institutions, including a few in settlements, according to public records.
In his classes, Palestinians were regarded at a distance, in part as security threats who committed acts of terrorism — including one that killed a sister of a classmate of Mr. Kushner’s.
When Mr. Trump ran for president, his son-in-law’s stances on Israel helped shape the campaign.
Mr. Kushner helped script a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and consulted with Netanyahu officials behind the scenes.
When he brought the candidate and the prime minister together for a meeting, his father, Charles Kushner, was invited to join them.
Thanks in part to the younger Mr. Kushner, Mr. Netanyahu will arrive at a White House that has already adopted many of the prime minister’s perspectives on the region.
Now Mr. Kushner is helping Mr. Trump and Mr. Netanyahu craft a strategy to recruit Sunni Muslim countries that oppose Iran to help foster an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement.
The approach is a long shot: Negotiations are dead. The Israeli right is pushing for more settlement in the West Bank as talk among Palestinians turns to a single state in which they have equal rights.
Mustafa Barghouti, a Palestinian leader who was involved in peace talks both with Israelis and internally, said Palestinians were skeptical of Mr. Kushner, and Mr. Trump’s team generally, seeing them as close only to the Israeli side.
As part of its philanthropy, Mr. Kushner’s family has made donations to the Beit El settlement, which Mr. Barghouti finds particularly worrisome.
The Zionist Jews are masters of deceit. Now the Jews have almost everyone, especially Christians and conservatives, thinking that Trump should have the power to “ban immigrants from Muslim nations.”
The Zionist Jews used 9/11 to lure almost everyone into wanting war with the Mid-East nations which the Jews media portrayed as being responsible for 9/11.
Nothing big happens in politics unless it’s planned. Divide and Conquer Politics has 2 sides, Democrats and Republicans. The Dems and jews media pretend to oppose Trump while the Repubs and Foxjews pretend to support Trump. It’s portrayed as one side vs the other side.
Whatever their reason, the Jews are working 24/7 to shape public opinion about Trump. Conservative minds are being molded to think Trump needs the power to ban immigration; that nobody should be able to stop him from it.
Like the Jews used 9/11 to incite the Mid-East wars, the Jews are probably using the immigration madness to achieve a desired outcome.
If the Jews can brainwash conservatives into believing Trump is the real deal, then lots of Jewish politics can be sold that nobody would buy under a President Hillary.
It appears that many of his fellows distrust Jared.
What will happen in the near future?
There is one certainty. As this year is 2017, with the 7 number featuring in the Gematria as one of the important numbers. something of great significance for Jewry will occur.
Already, their bosom pals cite and teach throughout U.S.A. and Germany among other nations a ‘Biblical’? significance.
They promulgate the ’sevens’ such as: 1917 of the Balfour Declaration; November 1947 when the U.N. confirmed the British Mandate; June 1967 in the capture of the Old City of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount; 1987 the first Palestinian uprising; 2007 Israeli Jets destroyed the nascent nuclear reactor and so on.
Little does the world and most Christians comprehend that this fixation on numerology is from the Gematria that is included in the Kabbalah.
It does not exist in the Bible we know in the West. Its origin is to be discovered in those books they follow. Let there come an awareness that they teach falsely and deceitfully ‘It is in the Bible’.
There are numbers throughout the Bible naturally. However, the numbers are never connected with the Occult, Witchcraft, Sorcery or Black Magic as is revealed in the books they blindly obey in the worship of Satanism and their gods. These are indeed, the ‘Serpent People’.
A war against Iran or Russia or both could be a consummation of some of their plans. The U.S.A. would be of necessity a major player but incited turmoil raging nation wide could be a conceived gain for them in some way.
The ‘Raging Lion’ who is all devious, deceitful, beguiling and subtle, is doubtless filling the minds of this Elite with hostile intentions and operations aimed at the downfall of all and sundry among the Goyim.
Ruling the world is an imperative of this, the world’s and the Christians’ greatest enemy.
It is not the threat of Islam but something far greater and more deeply entrenched.
It is political in its base, endeavoring to seize control everywhere and over all others who still remain after fearsome wars and attacks in every sphere of life, to eliminate much of the population.
This was existent in the times of Christ.
They envisioned in their messianic hopes that the Messiah would establish an earthly kingdom and deliver them from the Romans.
His Kingdom would encompass the earth, from shore to shore and forever, was the theme.
This view has intensified even though the Messiah did come and reveal through manifestations of His power and then death and resurrection, that He was that One.
Sadly, many Christians have been caught in the honeyed doctrines they have imposed where ever they have been agile enough to gain an entrance. Such are manifold.
Millions of those ones entrapped, have been beguiled unknowingly. Among them are those who do obey and follow Christ zealously, being disciples in other matters. I have had personal acquaintance with multitudes who do. The Lord Jesus alone is the One who knows and judges the thoughts and actions of all.
The nation had crucified and rejected Christ. Little did they realize they had crucified the Lord of Glory who had come in fulfillment of the promise to Abram, ‘That in you all the nations of the world will be blessed’. Jesus Christ was the Promised Seed to fulfill all Messianic hopes.
The people of the ‘book, Kabbalah’ are evident in nations and governments world-wide. They remain and will do so forever until their end that will surely eventuate as Paul wrote:
‘… the Jews. They do not please God and are haters (or enemies, adversaries or contrary) to all men’. God’s wrath was pronounced upon them.
There will be an end to these, who act with all the wisdom and subtlety of the vipers Jesus proclaimed them to be.
Activist Post: CIA Publicly Honors Massive Terrorist State — Proving Whose Side They’re On
[Hint: It’s Israel’s Secret Best Friend Who Came In From the Arabian Sands]
By Claire Bernish
In a move that would make Orwell spin in his grave, the CIA presented to the heir to the throne in Saudi Arabia — one of the biggest sponsors of terrorism on the planet — an award for ‘counter-terrorism.’
Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo traveled to Saudi Arabia to award Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef the George Tenet Medal in recognition of his “excellent intelligence performance, in the domain of counter-terrorism and his unbound contribution to realise world security and peace.”
In a statement paraphrased by Arab News, “the crown prince said the award represents international recognition of the Kingdom’s anti terrorism efforts under the directives of King Salman.”
The irony of any Saudi winning an award for combating terrorism is staggering — particularly given revelations found last year in emails leaked by WikiLeaks showing the U.S. political establishment has been well aware Saudi Arabia funds and supports the Islamic State.
“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Hillary Clinton wrote to John Podesta in an email dated August 17, 2014.
This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.
Perhaps bin Nayef couldn’t have been better poised to win this award from the CIA, given its namesake’s role in the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq — two failed military endeavors undertaken due to fabricated and false claims. Tenet served
According to Al Jazeera,
“Bin Nayef, 57, has been interior minister since 2012 and has years of experience in intelligence work.
“He oversaw a crackdown on al-Qaeda, a group that killed security officers and foreigners in the kingdom between 2003 and 2007.”
Bin Nayef vowed Saudi Arabia would continue to fight terrorism, and noted the Kingdom has thwarted a number of terrorist attacks, even against ally nations — though he didn’t elaborate on the nature of these alleged attacks.
“We are surrounded by areas of conflict, and we were the first affected by terrorism from various sources, but we are equipped to combat terror in any place and under any circumstances,” the crown prince claimed.
“The Kingdom has been keen to combat terrorism based on its conviction that terrorism has no identity and no religion, and from its belief that the terrorists are committing these acts stemming from their deviant ideologies and evil thought,” bin Nayef asserted. “All negative religious, political and social ideologies that use religion as a tool throughout human history, do not reflect the absolute truth about religion.”
While his statement certainly sounds legitimate, for the crown prince to dismiss Saudi Arabia’s support for the world’s enemy number one, Islamic State terrorists — not to mention the Kingdom’s horrendous human rights record, thanks to Wahhabist Islam — is the epitome of hypocrisy.
Hypocritical, but not surprising — and certainly far from shocking on the part of the of the CIA.
If the United States government were actually fighting the terrorism it claims to be, Saudi Arabia should not have received a dime of support in funds or arms once its ties to the Islamic State became common knowledge among the political powers-that-be. Of course, Washington already ignores the exacting human rights abuses the Saudis commit against their own people under a twisted amalgamation of monarchy, government, and religion.
Nevertheless, the pantomiming continues — the U.S. pretends to fight terrorism while arming and funding terrorists, and the Saudis do the same — each turning blind eyes to the other’s indiscretion and hypocrisy.
As bin Nayef stated,
Combating terrorism requires a joint international effort at all levels; financially, intellectually, militarily and through the media.
This should be coordinated and conducted in accordance with the UN’s covenants and laws including particularly the principle of sovereign equality.
Riyadh had grown somewhat disillusioned with the administration of former President Barack Obama, which appeared hesitant to engage in the Syrian civil war.
Relations chilled further upon a highly-criticized international deal to lift sanctions on Iran, which agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons — a deal Pompeo has denounced.
All hypocrisy on terrorism apparently aside, Bin Nayef seemed optimistic about the future shared goals of the two nations, saying,
Our relationship with the United States is historical and will continue to succeed.
Defense Priorities (conservative non-interventionist; war powers belong to Congress; promote a foreign policy that includes a greater reluctance to assert military force):
DID AMERICA MISS THE BIG PICTURE IN TRUMP’S YEMEN RAID?
By Bonnie Kristian
President Trump promised real change in U.S. foreign policy, and in at least one clear regard he has already delivered: Where President Obama spent six years waging covert drone warfare in Yemen and nearly two years quietly supporting brutal Saudi intervention in the Gulf state’s civil war, Trump drew national outrage to this heretofore ignored conflict in nine days flat.
He did so by ordering a commando raid to take out a leader of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
When the dust cleared, one American soldier and more than a dozen civilians were dead.
Among those killed was 8-year-old Nawar al-Awlaki, a little girl [and U.S. citizen] who had the misfortune to be born to al Qaeda propagandist and U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, whom the Obama administration killed by drone strikes along with one of his other children back in 2011.
Americans’ new attention to U.S. intervention in Yemen is rightly focused on these details, especially the tragic and preventable deaths. But if we only notice the particulars of this strike, we run the risk of missing an alarming bigger picture:
**This raid marked the first time the United States has put boots on the ground in combat in the Yemeni civil war, and those American soldiers were sent into the line of fire without constitutionally-required authorization from Congress.
[First time that the public knows of, anyway.]
If that seems like a pedantic consideration, I assure you it is not. This is a major new development in a military intervention launched by the Obama White House without public discussion or a declaration of war.
Obama started U.S. involvement in Yemen secretly and illegally, and to escalate to ground war—to putting U.S. troops in harm’s way—without so much as a go-ahead from Congress would be a serious mistake.
While it is true that AQAP is clearly linked to the Al Qaeda organization responsible for 9/11, and thus targeting them under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) is more plausible than most of the uses the AUMF sees these days, remember that Obama’s intervention in Yemen extends well beyond Al Qaeda.
Our primary focus is the Yemeni civil war, which has no real connection to the terms of 16-year-old AUMF. (Even targeting AQAP without fresh congressional authorization is arguably a stretch: It first became active in 2009, eight years after 9/11. How could Congress authorize war against an organization that did not yet exist?)
The American public deserves the opportunity to debate whether we want a new war waged in our name and funded by our money; and our military at the very least deserves a commander-in-chief who follows basic guidelines from our Constitution before risking their lives on another country’s behalf.
Congressional authorization is not too much to ask, and it is not a frivolous request.
It can serve as a valuable check on executive power—the very sort of abuse Trump says he intends to fix—bridling rash decisions from the White House and better tailoring U.S. foreign policy to defending America’s vital national interests.
That note of caution is especially important in Yemen, where there are no direct U.S. interests at stake.
On the contrary, what we find in Yemen is a convoluted mess, in which Washington is supporting a Saudi-led coalition that is credibly accused of war crimes, whose cause the United States aids more to mollify an increasingly inconvenient ally than to gain any clear advantage for ourselves.
Worse yet, as ordinary Yemenis starve to death thanks to Saudi blockade-induced famine, AQAP—the ruthless Al Qaeda affiliate Trump’s raid was meant to combat—is flourishing thanks to the power vacuum the civil war has produced.
The war, and thus that vacuum, is unquestionably prolonged by Saudi interference, which in turn is made possible by U.S. support.
In short, not only is U.S. intervention in Yemen not defending any American interests, it is counter-productively fostering the very terrorists Washington seeks to suppress.
Now that Americans are paying attention to Yemen, this should be our demand: If the White House wants to maintain this odious Obama project with no apparent value to U.S. security, it must make its case to Congress and the nation.
And if Congress will not declare war, then President Trump can and must extract American troops and end our military support for Saudi Arabia’s intervention in Yemen before this recent raid becomes one in a litany of unnecessary risks offering much to lose and little to gain.
Trump Keeps Obama’s Top Gay Rights Envoy at State Department
The move is stunning LGBT activists and is expected to anger evangelicals.
The Trump administration has decided to keep President Barack Obama’s top advocate for gay rights issues at the State Department in defiance of Christian groups who called for his immediate expulsion, Foreign Policy has learned.
Randy Berry, the Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons, is continuing “in his role under the current administration,” a State Department spokesperson said on Monday.
The move marks the latest surprise decision by President Donald Trump on gay rights as he juggles the agenda of his staunchly conservative cabinet and top aides, and his cosmopolitan, New York-bred daughter Ivanka and son-in-law Jared Kushner.
“This is really surprising to me,” Ross Murray, the director of programs at GLAAD, a pro-LGBT group, told FP. “I don’t think I can applaud it until I see what his mandate becomes in this administration.”
“But Berry has been really effective in that job,” he said.
Berry, an openly gay career Foreign Service officer whom conservative groups have derided as Obama’s “top gay activist,” became the first person to hold the position in February 2015.
In December, Tony Perkins, the head of the conservative Family Research Council, implored Trump to launch a major purge of pro-LGBT diplomats inside Foggy Bottom. “The incoming administration needs to make clear that these liberal policies will be reversed and the ‘activists’ within the State Department promoting them will be ferreted out,” he said.
The special envoy position was created during the Obama years to fight back against the discrimination of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people around the globe.
Conservative groups have called the office an attempt to “entrench the LGBTI agenda” into the United States government, and accuse it of browbeating countries opposed to gay-friendly school textbooks and same-sex marriage.
Berry repeatedly stressed that his goal was to convince foreign governments to stop violence against gays and lesbians rather than pressure every nation to allow same-sex marriage. “He was mindful not to be heavy-handed or overly colonial,” said Murray, who mentioned his work in countries with less tolerance for LGBT people, such as Uganda and Nigeria.
On Jan. 20, in one of the Obama administration’s final acts, it also named Berry deputy assistant secretary to the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Conservative groups blasted that decision as an 11th-hour move to place an LGBT-friendly diplomat in a position that has influence over U.S. policies at the United Nations.
The State Department spokesperson said Berry maintains his duties in both roles in the Trump administration.
The spokesperson declined to say why Berry wasn’t reassigned or dismissed last month when a slew of other political and career officials were booted by Trump loyalists.
A recently updated State Department organizational chart shows continued vacancies in positions opposed by Republicans on ideological grounds, such as the Special Envoy for Climate Change, a position previously filled by Jonathan Pershing. But Berry’s name and position remain intact.
It remains unclear if Berry could survive a concerted revolt by conservative activists opposed to his position.
In recent weeks, Trump has shown himself capable of surprising the LGBT community even as it wages opposition campaigns to oppose his cabinet appointments such as Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.
Earlier this month, Kushner and Ivanka Trump, who have a track record of supporting gay rights, worked to torpedo a draft executive order that would have overturned Obama’s regulations strengthening LGBT rights for federal contracting jobs, according to Politico.
Trump’s secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, pushed the Boy Scouts of America to be open to gay rights when he served as national president from 2010 to 2011. In 2013, while he served on the executive board of the Scouts, it rescinded the ban on gay scouts.
During his confirmation hearing, Tillerson declined to say whether “gay rights are human rights.”
The Family Research Council did not respond to a request for comment.
Fighting Hezbollah Tops Agenda of Netanyahu-Trump Meeting
Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is preparing to raise the issue of fighting Hezbollah during his upcoming meeting with the US President Donald Trump, according to Israeli media outlets which added that Tel Aviv aims at paralyzing the party financially.
Netanyahu will demand that Us administration imposes crippling sanctions on Iran in order to let it reconsider its support to Hezbollah, the Zionist reports added.
Maariv newspaper mentioned that the Hezbollah major military threat to ‘Israel’ will be also discussed during the meeting, as the Netanyahu wants Washington to conclude a deal with Russia to exclude Iran and Hezbollah from the Syrian formula.
The reports noted that the Zionists are frustrated with the Russian statements about Hezbollah anti-terror role, calling on Moscow to build an alliance with Washington because “granting Iran a major role in Syria endangers the Israeli entity.”
I have said this all along — that if Trump continues (and I see no reason why he wouldn’t) selling out America’s ‘greatness’ to IsraHell’s miserableness, it will impede any conciliation with Russia whose effective activities routing Isis in Syria is in collaboration with Iran and Hezbollah.
Netanyahu knows this and being the devil he is (playing to Trump’s ‘macho guy’ bent) plans on using the ‘Iran-Hezbollah’ card to continue Jewmerica’s isolation of Russia, a MAJOR player in the much-feared by Jewry: the Axis of Resistance of Iran, Syria, and Lebanon’s military entity Hezbollah. +BN
Who gave the USSR nuclear weapons in very short time?
Morris Cohen – an American, “Thanks to Cohen, designers of the Soviet atomic bomb got piles of technical documentation straight from the secret laboratory in Los Alamos,” the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda said.
Morris and his wife, Lona, served eight years in prison, less than half of their sentences before being released in a prisoner swap with the Soviet Union. He died without revealing the name of the American scientist who helped pass vital information about the United States atomic bomb project.
Klaus Fuchs – the German-born British theoretical physicist who worked with the British delegation at Los Alamos during the Manhattan Project.
After Fuchs’ confession, there was a trial that lasted less than 90 minutes, Lord Goddard sentenced him to fourteen years’ imprisonment, the maximum for violating the Official Secrets Act. He escaped the charge of espionage because of the lack of independent evidence and because, at the time of his activities, the Soviet Union was not an enemy of Great Britain.
In December 1950 he was stripped of his British citizenship. He was released on June 23, 1959, after serving nine years and four months of his sentence at Wakefield prison. He was allowed to emigrate to Dresden, then in the German Democratic Republic.
Harry Gold – an American, confessed to acting as a courier for Greenglass and Fuchs. He was sentenced in 1951 to thirty years imprisonment. He was paroled in May 1966, after serving just over half of his sentence.
David Greenglass – an American machinist at Los Alamos during the Manhattan Project. Greenglass confessed that he gave crude schematics of lab experiments to the Russians during World War II.
Some aspects of his testimony against his sister and brother-in-law (the Rosenbergs, see below) are now thought to have been fabricated in an effort to keep his own wife, Ruth, from prosecution. Greenglass was sentenced to 15 years in prison, served 10 years, and later reunited with his wife.
Theodore Hall – an American, the youngest physicist at Los Alamos who gave a detailed description of the Fat Man plutonium bomb, and of several processes for purifying plutonium, to Soviet intelligence.
His identity as a spy was not revealed until very late in the 20th century. He was never tried for his espionage work, though he admitted to it in later years to reporters and to his family.
George Koval – the American-born son of a Belorussian emigrant family that returned to the Soviet Union where he was inducted into the Red Army and recruited into the GRU intelligence service. He infiltrated the US Army and became a radiation health officer in the Special Engineering Detachment.
Acting under the code name Delmar he obtained information from Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Dayton Project about the Urchin detonator used on the Fat Man plutonium bomb. His work was not known to the west until he was posthumously recognized as a hero of the Russian Federation by Vladimir Putin in 2007.
Irving Lerner – an American film director, he was caught photographing the cyclotron at the University of California, Berkeley in 1944. After the war he was blacklisted.
Alan Nunn May – a British citizen, he was one of the first Soviet spies uncovered during the Cold War. He worked on the Manhattan Project and was betrayed by a Soviet defector in Canada.
His was uncovered in 1946 and it led the United States to restrict the sharing of atomic secrets with Britain. On May 1, 1946, he was sentenced to ten years hard labour. He was released in 1952, after serving six and a half years.
Ethel and Julius Rosenberg – Americans who were involved in coordinating and recruiting an espionage network that included Ethel’s brother, David Greenglass.
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were tried for conspiracy to commit espionage, since the prosecution seemed to feel that there was not enough evidence to convict on espionage. Treason charges were not applicable, since the United States and the Soviet Union were allies at the time.
The Rosenbergs denied all the charges but were convicted in a trial in which the prosecutor Roy Cohn said he was in daily secret contact with the judge, Irving Kaufman. Despite an international movement demanding clemency, and appeals to President Dwight D. Eisenhower by leading European intellectuals and the Pope, the Rosenbergs were executed at the height of the Korean War.
President Eisenhower wrote to his son, serving in Korea, that if he spared Ethel (presumably for the sake of her children), then the Soviets would simply recruit their spies from among women.
Saville Sax – an American, acted as the courier for Klaus Fuchs and Theodore Hall.
Morton Sobell – the American engineer tried and convicted along with the Rosenbergs who was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment, but released in 1969, after serving 17 years and 9 months.
After proclaiming his innocence for over half a century, Sobell admitted spying for the Soviets, and implicated Julius Rosenberg, in an interview with the New York Times published on September 11, 2008.
It’s almost looks like their is planning in a nuclear standoff between the west and the east will these horrible weapons come to use?
Remember the elite has nuclear proof bunkers and information when the situation escalates.
National Day of Jewish Action For Refugees - Doing all they can to make Jewmerica look like Sweden.
The organized Jewish community, led by organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League and HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society), is planning a large-scale “National Day of Jewish Action” to protest President Trump’s immigration proposals.
All you little boys with all your little toys.
Your minds control the world.
You jump round from pole to pole yet never glimpse your soul.
“For the indignation of the LORD is upon all nations, and his fury upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood.”
Seriously folks. Its not the what’s being done but the brazen audacity at which it does.
Lets all stop wasting our time talking any more.
Either the military gets involved right now, not tomorrow, or next month, or its OVER. Maybe its time for the people that have to take reign of a lawless country under Jewish control.
Go door to door if they have to and launch em like Putin did. Every single one of them.
The military has 2 choices — either die over a fake war with Russia, or do the same here but at least protecting your family. Your choice! Turn the turrets and re-read your oath. You havent won a war since the 40s. Time to turn that loosing steak around on one that’s for a good cause.
The fact that Podesta and his gang of creeps still havent seen handcuffs should have foreshadowed.
Trump could have nipped this in the bud by ordering arrests immediately but he didn’t. And please, nobody tell me one needs more time for for evidence or investigation.
During WWII the Germans proposed the “Madagascar Plan” as a solution which would have removed most of the Jews from Europe and relocated them to the island of Madagascar. The plan of course fell through amid all the chaos of WWII.
The leading powers of the world such as Russia, USA, China, etc. should at some future time band together and propose a similar plan on a global scale where the majority of the world’s Jews are relocated to an island such as Madagascar.
There they would live in exile and undergo rigorous Christian re-education to adopt Christian codes of ethics. This could be run similar to any military boot camp and Jews would undergo intensive de-Judaization.
Zionism was promoted partly as providing a “homeland” for Jews where they could have a Jewish nation and culture separate from Christian society. But all this has done is encouraged the Jews to continue on as an elite group and continue their Jewish supremacy.